Sony 18-105 F4 Review - If You Could Only Have ONE Lens...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лип 2024
  • ★ The Sony 18-105 F4 G OSS Review ★ If you could only have ONE lens, which lens would it be and why? For me, having a zoom with a constant aperture that can cover me from a decently wide range to a reasonable telephoto range and still give me great quality would be the dream. The closest thing I've been able to find so far is this lens. The Sony 18-105 F4.
    Buy This Lens (affiliate link) - geni.us/Dunna18105
    ★ VitalHouse (Video Sponsor/Channel Partner) ★ - Amazing Vegan Protein Packed Meal Replacement Shakes! Yes, I actually drink these and I LOVE THEM!!
    geni.us/DunnaVitalHouse
    #dunnadidit #sonyalpha #sp
    QUICK LINKS
    □ I GET MY MUSIC FROM THE FOLLOWING AMAZING SERVICES:
    ● MUSICBED: bit.ly/musicbed01
    ● EPIDEMIC SOUND: bit.ly/dunnaepidemicsound
    ● ARTLIST: bit.ly/dunnaartlist
    □ FULL GEAR LIST: kit.co/dunnadidit
    □ LIGHTROOM PRESET PACK: www.dunnadidit.com/store
    □ SIGN UP FOR MY NOTIFICATION SQUAD: www.dunnadidit.com/notificatio...
    SOCIAL
    □ IG: / dunnadidit
    □ TWITTER: / dunnadidit
    □ FACEBOOK: / dunnadidit
    □ WEB: www.dunnadidit.com
    GEAR I USE
    -Cameras-
    □ Main Camera - Sony a7iii: geni.us/dunnasonya7iii
    □ B Camera - Sony a6400:geni.us/dunnaa6400
    □ Spare Batteries & Charger for a7iii:geni.us/a7iiibatteries
    □ Spare Batteries & Charger for a6400: geni.us/dunna6500batteries
    -Lenses-
    □ Sigma 16mm F1.4: geni.us/Dunna16mm
    □ Sony 18-105 F4: geni.us/Dunna18105
    □ Sony 16-35 F4: geni.us/dunnasony1635f4
    □ Sigma 30mm F1.4: geni.us/dunna30mm
    □ Sigma 56mm F1.4: geni.us/dunnasigma56
    -Lighting-
    □ Big Main Light - Aputure 120dii: geni.us/dunna120dii
    □ Softbox for Main Light - Aputure Light Dome ii: geni.us/lightdomeii
    □ Less Expensive Light - Falconeyes SO48td: geni.us/dunnaso48td
    □ Even Cheaper/Smaller Light - Falconeyes SO28td: geni.us/dunnaedgelitled01
    □ Big Light Stand - Neewer C-Stand: geni.us/dunnacstand
    □ Small Light Stand - Neewer Light stand: geni.us/dunnalightstand
    □ Cute TINY Light: geni.us/dunnalittleled
    -Audio-
    □ My Main Microphone - Deity Vmic D3Pro: geni.us/dunnad3pro
    □ Backup (cheaper) version - Deity Vmic D3: geni.us/deityvmicd3
    □ Wireless Lav Setup - Deity Connect: geni.us/dietyconnect
    □ Portable recorder - Roland R-07: geni.us/dunnar07
    -Other Stuff-
    □ Daily Camera Backpack - WANDRD PRVKE Backpack: geni.us/DUNNAPRVKE31
    □ Main Tripod - 3 Legged Thing Punks Brian: geni.us/3ltpunksbrian
    □ Cheaper Tripod - Neewer Carbon Fibre: geni.us/dunnatripod
    □ SUPER FAST External Drive: geni.us/DunnaSSD
    Professional inquires please email: contact@dunnadidit.com
    Disclaimer: Most of the purchase links in this description are affiliate links.
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~
    Please watch: "Which Lens Is The Best Choice For YOU? Tamron 70-180 vs Sony 70-200 f4 Review."
    • Head-to-Head Lens Comp...
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @dunnadidit
    @dunnadidit  6 років тому +73

    I should really ask you guys how to pronounce your Instagram handles... 😅😅 Sorry!

    • @Abdulisbasith
      @Abdulisbasith 6 років тому +2

      Dunna Did It 😂

    • @jawaher4655
      @jawaher4655 6 років тому +3

      Dunna Did It You are one of the first people who actually pronounced my name right 😆

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      WHAT! NO WAY!! I thought I had totally failed on that for sure!!

    • @PerEinarL
      @PerEinarL 6 років тому +2

      Even Norwegians have a huge problem to pronounce my name😬

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +5

      Per - Yeah I probably would have just given up if you had asked a question for this video. “This other person also asked a question 😂”

  • @jackofblades6736
    @jackofblades6736 6 років тому +1350

    1mm to 1000mm f0.95

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +216

      Perfect! Pancake lens too right?

    • @jackofblades6736
      @jackofblades6736 6 років тому +101

      Dunna Did It psssshhhh. Needs to be thicc like a 70-200 to look professional.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +64

      Tru tru... dress to impress right?

    • @naughtyskweet6
      @naughtyskweet6 5 років тому +21

      @@jackofblades6736 lol! Gotta look professional. Hilarious

    • @KevinZJR
      @KevinZJR 5 років тому +45

      Here you go, weighs at 50kg.

  • @_Isaacchan
    @_Isaacchan 3 роки тому +109

    I really like how he still reply’s to us even if the video is 2 years old!! Such a good UA-camr 👍

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +36

      I’m tryin!

    • @VastCNC
      @VastCNC 3 роки тому +2

      Respect

    • @godsinbox
      @godsinbox 2 роки тому +2

      Im over 50 years old, and nobody ever listens to me.

  • @lukasdraheim4873
    @lukasdraheim4873 6 років тому +14

    Hi Dunna, thanks for creating this video for us! You also used a lot of movement and titles and video examples in this video so it was entertaining and informative at the same time, amazing job done here! And I have to say I truly appreciate all the lenghts you went to to show the strengths and weaknesses of the lens, use cases and comparisons. Most UA-camrs just state the obvious facts that everyone knows, but you introduced new aspects, gave your honest opinion and convinced me of the quality of this lens! I will definitely buy the 18-105 now!
    Keep going with your videos, I'm sure many people also appreciate the time and effort you put into these high quality videos and more and more people will come to your channel right for that!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Wow thank you for those kind words! I’m so glad that you enjoy my videos and find them helpful! Thanks for asking a question!! When you get around to picking up the lens I hope you really enjoy it!

  • @beaverbreweryminsk5392
    @beaverbreweryminsk5392 5 років тому +2

    Man, you helped me BIG TIME with your words about extension and rebalancing the gimbal. I watched so many videos but you were the only one paying attention to this! Thank you so much!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      That’s so great to hear! Let me know if you have any more questions!

    • @beaverbreweryminsk5392
      @beaverbreweryminsk5392 5 років тому +1

      Your videos have all the answers for my questions, right on point. Really happy to find your channel, it's fun, easy to watch and so INFORMATIVE.
      You deserve a lot bigger audience

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      Thanks so much!! I’m so glad you think so!

  • @davva360
    @davva360 5 років тому +43

    I have the following: 10-18mm F4 / 18-105mm F4 / 70-200mm F4 / 50mm F1.8. I agree with you, the 18-105mm is the one I use the most by far. It is such a great lens for shooting in a wide variety of situations. The other lenses I have are great too but only in the right situation. I take mainly still images but I still like having constant F4 so that I do not have to compromise on my settings because I want to zoom in.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +2

      That’s great to hear! It really is a great lens!

    • @iwangmail
      @iwangmail 5 років тому +2

      Lens 18-105 f.4 and 35mm f1.8 is best for me.

    • @paulgochoa
      @paulgochoa Рік тому

      Compared to the 50 1.8, is it really more noisy and less sharp?

  • @darksideemt
    @darksideemt 6 років тому +16

    This has always been my most wanted lens since I got my a6000 and watching this vid hasn't helped that...lol. Great info as always. Hope the van situation got fixed.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      I’m so glad this was helpful! Thanks for watching!
      Mo (the van) is in the shop now being taken care of 😞 poor girl!

  • @bricemoula4116
    @bricemoula4116 5 років тому +2

    this is really helping, full of good advices, examples, and you answered to all my questions ! thanks man 😃

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      My pleasure! Thanks so much for watching!

  • @mw599
    @mw599 4 роки тому

    Dunna, thanks so much! You helped me decide on getting this lens and also the A6400. Really helpful content bro!

  • @nostaljeck
    @nostaljeck 6 років тому +3

    loving your videos man! very informative!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Thanks so much Jeck! I’m happy you find them helpful!

  • @matthewbrown6537
    @matthewbrown6537 6 років тому +11

    I own the 18-105 and the 50 f1.8 as well as a few vintage lenses (a Minolta 135 f/2.8 Rokkor and a Helios 58 f/2). I use the 18-105 almost all the time, unless I’m taking portraits or I’m in low light. It’s a great lens especially for the A6300 because of the OSS.

  • @ethanHat
    @ethanHat 6 років тому +1

    That was a great review! You really have a great skill in explaining things! Thanks!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      Thanks so much Ethan! I’m glad you enjoyed it!

  • @ChrisTowerzTV
    @ChrisTowerzTV 2 роки тому

    Awesome video! The various examples of video and photos in different scenarios put the video over the top for me. Excellent content and very informative. Thanks! Subbed!

  • @GoProTuto
    @GoProTuto 6 років тому +56

    All people talk about the crazy sharpness they can have with crazy lens.... But for the moment I have only the kit lens (16-50) and it's an awesome lens, I took some crazy photos with ! But I think I will be the 18-105mm because it's more versatile than the kit lens. And I you think it's more sharp than the kit lens, it will be perfect !
    Thank you again for your video, big thumb up from france ;)

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +13

      People definitely don’t give the kit lens enough credit. It’s still a good lens. I think this 18-105 is the perfect upgrade though. For a bit more versatility and a bit better quality!
      Thanks for watching and greetings from Canada!

    • @HAlariousInc
      @HAlariousInc 4 роки тому +1

      Photographie & Vidéo The 16-50 is incredibly soft. Once you finally upgrade and start using lenses like the 24-105 then you’ll see a huge difference

    • @liceafilms
      @liceafilms 4 роки тому

      TRNDSTTRS yeah that’s over a grand for a lens when most people’s cameras don’t even cost that much. Chill out

    • @chrisschoenfeld4414
      @chrisschoenfeld4414 4 роки тому +2

      The kit lens is fantastic - its ridiculously small and light, performs well, has OSS, and takes outstanding pictures. Its the poster child for what the APS-C is supposed to be. Love your kit lens that's why its the kit lens.

  • @mariofranciscoreyeshernand2482
    @mariofranciscoreyeshernand2482 2 роки тому

    it's just what i need🔥
    I love your content, especially that you show a lot of examples
    Greetings from Mexico🇲🇽

  • @redtees1
    @redtees1 3 роки тому +1

    Mine just arrived today! Thank you for the great review!

  • @SyifaAdriana
    @SyifaAdriana 6 років тому +16

    Hi man! Thanks for the thorough review especially knowing that you’ve been using it for a good year. I am currently using both Sigma 16mm & 30mm on a6500 for travel vlogging. To be honest when backpacking around, I wouldnt really change my lens since it’s not so versatile. As much as I am loving the sharpness of prime lens, I am really thinking of selling both for 18-105mm. At the end, as a budget traveler I feel like versatility does matter and I only want to carry one lens. What would be your suggestion since you have all three lenses?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      I totally hear what you’re saying Syifa! I carry around all three all the time and my backpack gets pretty cumbersome(I always carry too much stuff) as far as other suggestions... what kind of images do you take? And is it mostly video or photo?

    • @SyifaAdriana
      @SyifaAdriana 6 років тому +2

      Dunna Did It thank you for your quick reply! Only for videography I dont do any photography other than for thumbnail LOL...

    • @JunaidKureshi
      @JunaidKureshi 6 років тому +1

      Syifa Adriana you have same arsenal of lenses as me, im not impressed with 18-105, its not very sharp and not very good indoors, prime lenses are awesome

    • @SyifaAdriana
      @SyifaAdriana 6 років тому +1

      Junaid Kureshi Thanks for the insight Junaid! That’s definitely my concern about 18-105 re sharpness. But can’t have the perfect world can we LOL

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Then to be honest I’d say the 18-105 is your best choice! There are a couple other lenses that might be a good choice if you did primarily photography, but this thing was made for video!

  • @MrJASoch
    @MrJASoch 5 років тому +7

    My budget was pretty tight when I bought my a7iii so this was the first lens I bought. Love the variety I get from this lens. I think it’s a solid choice and will hold me off for a while.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому

      That’s great! I’ve been thinking about an a7iii but would probably have to live with my apsc lenses for a while, so it’s good to hear they do the trick!

  • @etravix
    @etravix 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks for a good and honest review. Definitely helped with my decision to buy it.

  • @gedheaton1415
    @gedheaton1415 5 років тому +1

    great review and very well presented, A1,subbed,liked and more importantly Thank you.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      Thank you so much for the kind comment and for subscribing! I’m so glad you liked it!

  • @christopherpackart
    @christopherpackart 5 років тому +7

    I was looking at getting the A6400 and foregoing the kit lens and get this for general photography and then some Sigma primes for video.
    I have the 18-135mm for my Canon but the f/5.6 at the end kills me sometimes when it starts to get darker just after sunset.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +2

      Everything you just said(except the a6400, I have the 6500) is exactly what I have and I highly recommend it!!

    • @bartoszkowalczk7362
      @bartoszkowalczk7362 Рік тому +1

      You said 6000, 6300 and 6500 is it bad for 6400 ?

  • @camerondejesus948
    @camerondejesus948 4 роки тому +3

    About to buy this for my 6400. Can’t wait!

  • @doublerfanatic5641
    @doublerfanatic5641 5 років тому +2

    Absolutely useful for me to make my decision if I want to buy a lens that suits all occassions, thanks a lot Dunna.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      My pleasure! Thanks for watching!!

  • @TheAmerykanka
    @TheAmerykanka 3 роки тому +1

    Super helpful! Thank you for making this video

  • @FAT8893
    @FAT8893 4 роки тому +8

    It's hard to believe that I still didn't find any lens with constant or fixed aperture that provides that much of a focal length range. This lens may be more than six years old now, but boy this is my all time favourite lens. Once I've seen any brand come up with similar product like this Sony lens, I definitely wouldn't bother selling it.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  4 роки тому

      Yeah it still holds up for sure!

  • @reimonandisuwa
    @reimonandisuwa 6 років тому +19

    got this lens as my first (except the kit), been using it ever since most of the time for nearly everything.
    always my lens recommendation to anyone ask me which lens to buy for sony aps-c

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +4

      Awesome!! Love it!

    • @gioortiz8459
      @gioortiz8459 3 роки тому +1

      I was thinking about going with the sigma 16 f1.4 for my first lens other than my kit lens. But now I kinda want the zoom capability, what’s the difference in quality between the sigma and this 18-105?

    • @carloenix
      @carloenix 3 роки тому +1

      @@gioortiz8459 same man!!! That's what I was thinking, too!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Y’all should keep an eye out for the tamron 17-70 f2.8 coming out soon. It might make me change my mind on this one

    • @carloenix
      @carloenix 3 роки тому

      @@dunnadidit Awesome, I’ll surely check this one out!

  • @nickkruger9566
    @nickkruger9566 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for this video! Great info and great lens.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      No problem Nick! Thanks so much for watching!!

  • @forthefamilyuk
    @forthefamilyuk 10 місяців тому

    Wow. Been watching your videos for nearly half a year now and stumbled across this one.
    Your videos have really levelled up from 5 years ago. Well done! I notice the background noise in this video, and in comparison your most recent ones are silent.
    Any advice on how you improved your sound from then until now?

  • @lvminh
    @lvminh 5 років тому +8

    Well I also have this one in my ‘lineup‘ but I was a bit disappointed of its still image quality. If there’s only one lens I can carry for my aps-c, I would say it’s Sigma 16mm f1.4
    Thanks for sharing the video. Your videos have always been informative & fun!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      Thanks for sharing Maxwell!!

  • @EmmanuelOkorie
    @EmmanuelOkorie 6 років тому +6

    That's a tough one... I have owned this lens for at least a couple of years now and it has been pretty superb for me. Recently used it to shoot a wedding video and to take pictures of the guests at the wedding. While I had my Sigma 16mm lens with me, I wasn't tempted to use it. I always get consistent good results with the lens to be honest. Would be good if Sony released a f2.8 constant aperture version of this lens. I would be snapping it up asap....
    Thanks for the great video as well....

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      I totally agree! It would be nice to have f2.8 for sure but it still does a pretty darn good job :)

  • @zlatarum1967
    @zlatarum1967 5 років тому +2

    Good presentation body. I just bought it... Makes all its money !!! Thanks a lot !

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      Great to hear! Hope you like it!

  • @mellemel5
    @mellemel5 5 років тому +1

    Awesome video. I plan on using it mainly for portrait shots. Sneaker pictures mostly. Just subscribed.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      That’s awesome! So glad you enjoyed the video!

  • @ryanmacalandag5279
    @ryanmacalandag5279 6 років тому +15

    I just recently purchased this lens used for cheap. I needed this as main lens for events. If ever I needed b-roll, I can just quickly change into my Sigma 30mm 1.4 or 50mm. But for most shots, this thing does a great job.
    Love the review! Binge watching right now. 😎

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +3

      Sounds pretty close to my kit Ryan! Great minds think alike!
      Thanks for bingeing! Hope you enjoy!

    • @wabbitpoop
      @wabbitpoop 4 роки тому

      What's a good used price?

    • @shamusic04
      @shamusic04 4 роки тому

      Where did you buy it used from ?

  • @CodgerCam
    @CodgerCam 6 років тому +2

    Agree, I have had this lens for a couple years and it is my walk about lens. At f4 it is not a great event lens as auto focus will hunt in low light. If you have had this lens for a bit, there is a lens firmware update that seemed to me to improve it performance on the a6500 that I shoot with.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Great insight Eric! I totally agree!

  • @colezimmerman
    @colezimmerman 6 років тому +1

    Great video👌🏼 definitely want to purchase this lens!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Thanks Cole! Link is in the description lol 😉

  • @NicksFort
    @NicksFort 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the review! How do you like the power zoom feature? I saw a sample from another video and I was like..."damn, now I can be like Wes Anderson!" Is the power zoom smooth for video? Is it easy to ease into and out of?

  • @JonniArmani
    @JonniArmani 5 років тому +4

    This is a fantastic lens I use this on my Sony a 7R2 for not only video but I also get 18 megapixel sized images for photography so it’s really very versatile. Nice review,)

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      That’s so awesome! I’ve often wondered about apsc lenses on the a7rii and a7riii

  • @rondub
    @rondub 6 років тому +4

    I use the Sony 18-135mm most of the time. It's only flaw in my opinion is low light shooting but I don't really take that many photos where there's not enough light.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      I think the only thing that is stopping me from switching to the 18-135 is the changing aperture. If they had made it constant f4... game over.

  • @Pepepowah
    @Pepepowah 5 років тому +1

    Your grading is gorgeous. Just subbed!

  • @MatassaMedia
    @MatassaMedia 6 років тому +1

    DOPE! Thanks for releasing this video. I recently sold my SEL50F18 since I wasn’t using it at all these days, and picked up the Sigma 16mm 1.4 since I am planning on doing lots of interior/real estate videos. However, I will definitely be investing in this lens once I start doing more event videos.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Thanks for watching!! I love the 16mm too! This is a great compliment for sure!

  • @johndonaldson5126
    @johndonaldson5126 5 років тому +35

    I voted big time with my dollars to have this lens. It, like your situation, is on my camera 80% of the time.
    I had alpha mount cameras and lenses. I really like my alpha mount Sony 16-50 f2.8 and Sigma 70-200 f2.8 (my favorite lens overall) but the gap between 50mm and 70mm seemed to be what I needed very often. The closest thing to this 18-105 in the alpha mount just didn't work for me. So I ended up selling most of my alpha mount lenses and two camera bodies to switch to an a6500 and a set of e mount lenses earlier this year. I still have an alpha mount Sony A77 and the 16-50 and 70-200. Those lenses didn't work well on the e mount adapter. But after the dust settled I'm so pleased with the a6500 and the 18-105.
    Yes the 18-105 isn't as sharp as the wonderful other lenses, but it's sharp enough for me and I'm fussy about sharpness. The range is great and if I want to I can use Clear Image Zoom to extend the range. I'm not big into video and people say the powered zoom is for video. I use the power zoom a lot to frame still shots. It zooms silently. It isn't too heavy. I really like this lens. I wish it was an f2.8 but it would likely be much larger and way more expensive.
    I have the 16-50 kit lens too and use it regularly. It isn't the greatest lens but it is so small it turns my a6500 into a convenient pocket camera. Again with Clear Image Zoom I can get out to 100mm with it.
    My f2.8 20mm was probably a waste of money. I bought it as a pancake but it isn't that much smaller than the kit lens.
    The sharpest lens I have is the f1.8 35mm but it is too limiting for most run and gun days, although it is great for indoor shots where there is movement in the subject like indoor sports.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +2

      Thanks for the input John! We definitely see eye to eye on this one!!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      I think that would be a great combo! 18-105 for run and gun and the 35 for more planned stuff!

  • @FathoniYasir
    @FathoniYasir 6 років тому +5

    The only zoom lens i have for my 6300, completing my glass besides 35mm and fe 85

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      That’s a fantastic sounding kit!

  • @SebastianValensi
    @SebastianValensi 5 років тому +1

    dude what a review!!! awesome brother, thanks!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      Thank you so much Sebastian!

  • @rannokasemaa8709
    @rannokasemaa8709 5 років тому +1

    Super helpful! Thanks, mate!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      My pleasure! Thanks for watching!!

  • @chamodmalalathunga6920
    @chamodmalalathunga6920 5 років тому +17

    When compared to kit lens how this lens perform in both wide & zoom (18mm & 50mm)?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +8

      My experience is that it’s better than the kit all around, but not a HUGE difference.

    • @saurabhcent211
      @saurabhcent211 3 роки тому +1

      It's very good. Better than the kit lens.

  • @richarddzisiewski7197
    @richarddzisiewski7197 5 років тому +3

    Ive just bought a fs5 with this lens and you've just confirmed everything ...nice piece. thx

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      That’s awesome! Thanks for watching!

  • @creativejuicewithoutpulp
    @creativejuicewithoutpulp 3 роки тому

    Great review! thank you so much

  • @marsshotgun
    @marsshotgun 4 роки тому +1

    Super helpful video man thanks alot!

  • @Carolyne_games
    @Carolyne_games 5 років тому +3

    I’d probably prefer the 18-135 over this one for the smaller size, less weight, and wider range. Did try the 18-105 in store though, quality is definitely top notch!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      I totally hear you, the big winner for this one for me is the constant f4. But it’s a trade off for sure!

  • @roaldeuller
    @roaldeuller 5 років тому +10

    For the Sony a6000 series I would happy with a faster version of the kit lens, say a 16-70 f2.8. I know there is the Zeiss 16-70 f4 but the reviews on that are very iffy plus it costs almost $1000. Surely someone can do better? (I'd even settle for a 16-50 or 16-55 f2.8). [edit] I should say that the small form factor is a big deal for me, which is my main objection to the 18-105. Plus I prefer wider at the low end than long reach.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +2

      I hear you 100%. I wouldn’t hold your breath though. I would even love to see a bit of a less expensive 16-35 f2.8. The only one is the master and it’s like $3000(CAD) and it’s a big lens! I’m going to be doing a comparison between the 16-70 and the 18-105 soon. The 16-70 is nice and small but I hear what you’re saying about the reviews. It’s not the sharpest lens for sure (still better than the kit lens though I suppose).

    • @bloodmoney88
      @bloodmoney88 3 роки тому

      sony zies 16-70, rocks. Buy it on special or from a second hand exchange. I bought it on special (30% off xmas deal) I'm stoked with it... I also have the sony 90mmG so know that level of sharpness. The 16-70, being less sharp than the 90 et al (marginally), gives a slight softness that I like. I bought the 90 for portraits, and macro of course, but for portraits I'll often switch to the zies. So per the video, if I had only one choice I'd sell the gear for heroin.

    •  2 роки тому

      Your wishes have been heard. There is the amazing 16-55 mm F2.8 G lens.

  • @Tinsen1974
    @Tinsen1974 5 років тому +1

    thx dunna! great video, nice guy. good job!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      Thanks so much Don! I appreciate it!

  • @resonatemusicstudio
    @resonatemusicstudio 6 років тому +2

    Love this lens! Its taken so many nice photos at our recitals and events!!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      It’s definitely my go to for that! Quick picture of the whole stage with the performer... zoom in, quick picture of them playing close up. BAM!

  • @acousticguitarfan55
    @acousticguitarfan55 5 років тому +6

    Great review! I have the a6000 and this lens is perfect for it. I also have a Sony FE 70-200 mm constant aperture 4.0 which translates out to 105-300 on an cropped sensor so I've got the complete focal range of 18 to 300 covered! For the money I think this lens is a great investment paired with the FE 70-200. It's all I need!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      That sounds like a fantastic combo!!

  • @GallaghersGrub
    @GallaghersGrub 6 років тому +10

    I chose the new 18-135 over the 18-105 for it's lighter weight, smaller size and longer range. Both solid choices though.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Nice! I really need to get one of these 18-135 to try. Are you shooting photography mostly or any video?

    • @GallaghersGrub
      @GallaghersGrub 6 років тому +2

      Dunna Did It I mostly use it walking for photos. Great at Sporting events (MLB baseball) when I need up close shots of family, zoomed in shots of players, and wide angle shots of the stadium

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +3

      Nice! It’s supposed to be super sharp!

    • @GallaghersGrub
      @GallaghersGrub 6 років тому +3

      Well, it's not Sigma 16 f1.4 sharp. But for a zoom, it gets the job done.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Haha I totally hear you there!

  • @sks146
    @sks146 9 місяців тому

    Can we use this kens for video?

  • @journeygraph7111
    @journeygraph7111 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks for this video, your recommendations, your effort in sharing your helpful thoughts about this lens. Just got myself a 18-105 mm. God bless you :)

  • @angelofnyxx
    @angelofnyxx 6 років тому +7

    Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 by far the best lens I have ever paired with the a6500. With the mc-11 adapter that sigma has made specifically for it, you usually get about 90% auto focus speed compared to a native lens, which in my opinion is fantastic. Also can’t beat the 1.8 bokeh compared to the f/4

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      Ahhh I want this so bad!!

    • @Cr8tiveDre
      @Cr8tiveDre 6 років тому +3

      I would agree with having the sigma 18-35 but that setup is so big I only use it to record video for youtube in my office. I rather the Sony 35 1.8 or the sigma 30 for there size and sharpness. Plus I find that the adapter drains battery when the camera is off

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      Very interesting points! I’ve been super interested in the 18-35. Those are good things to keep in mind

    • @angelofnyxx
      @angelofnyxx 6 років тому +2

      The Broke Consumer it’s nothing compared to a Canon 1DMX1 w/ 24-70 on it, with Sony we are being spoiled already. Also, being able to punch in and out is incredibly crucial and I have found that in my experience it can be the difference between a great shot and an okay shot. And I use a grip on my camera so battery isn’t such an issue to me.

    • @BigBoss-gb4cx
      @BigBoss-gb4cx 5 років тому +3

      Yeah, but honestly using f1.8 for portraits is kind of too much: if you focus on the eyes you lost focus on other parts of the face.

  • @TheTicker
    @TheTicker 6 років тому +3

    What did you film on during the talking head shots while holding the camera kit you’re talking about?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +4

      Sigma 30mm f1.4 😁 on of my favorites. I have a review on that too! ua-cam.com/video/89NLu539MCU/v-deo.html

    • @TheTicker
      @TheTicker 6 років тому +3

      Thanks for the quick reply. Currently shooting with the GH5, though thinking about moving to Sony.
      Side note, hate that UA-cam made me reload the video on mobile to see your reply. *shakes fists*

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +5

      As much as I highly recommend moving to Sony 😉😉 I should mention that sigma makes an M4/3 Mount version of that 30mm as well and people seem to love it! But switch to Sony anyway haha.
      And yeah I know what you mean about the reload thing. Then you spend 3 minutes trying to figure out where you were in the video so you can pick up.

  • @JohnIndiveri
    @JohnIndiveri 6 років тому +1

    Dunna! Damn man, I just got the sigma 30, now you're tempting me on this! Gah! Great, informative vid as always man!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      Haha! I guess the word “influencer” is a bit too true hey? 😉

    • @JohnIndiveri
      @JohnIndiveri 6 років тому +1

      Dunna Did It haha I'd say so! Not a bad thing 🤙

  • @PassionCentreCanada
    @PassionCentreCanada 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the review, I just got this lens for video

  • @JunaidKureshi
    @JunaidKureshi 6 років тому +4

    Great review, i wish this lens was f2.2 i guess no one making any of these, if that was the case i would have choose this over sigma 30 & 16

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      Yeah me too! I have all three of those and they all serve their purpose for sure. It would be nice to see something with this range with a bit better aperture though... my 30 and 16 might collect some dust if that was the case haha

    • @amrokas
      @amrokas 3 роки тому

      What? This lens is at most 15% better than a 16-50 kit lens. There is nothing about this lens I could call quality. While simga 30mm's sharpness at f2.8 can cut your eyes.

  • @darkizzz07
    @darkizzz07 6 років тому +4

    Well I have rn canon 77d and 24-105mm 4L II usm and it's my "go to" I know that's bad that I have but it's budget and good

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +3

      I don’t think that’s bad at all! Whatever gets the job done best and works within your budget is the PERFECT choice!

  • @Louis.DeGuzman
    @Louis.DeGuzman 4 роки тому +1

    Gotta love how you inserted the 𝗩𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 ad! ♥️ 1:17

  • @TheHallberger
    @TheHallberger 3 роки тому

    0:53 that cage looks sooooo good!! 😍

  • @marlinahboo9906
    @marlinahboo9906 5 років тому +3

    Do I need the adapter for this lens to use with a A7RII?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +3

      Nope! But you will have to use it in crop mode.

  • @AlbertoMendoza
    @AlbertoMendoza 6 років тому +9

    18-105 is definitely my favorite for an all around lens for my 6300

  • @vd_a6169
    @vd_a6169 6 років тому +2

    awesome! I'm waiting for this to come in the mail and this video really reinforced my decision. I'm also waiting on the Sony 35mm 1.8 for low light, do touch think these 2 lens covers a good range of shots for video? thanks man love the vid

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      This is going to be a great combo for you! I think you’re going to really enjoy both!

    • @thiagout
      @thiagout 5 років тому +1

      Those two are exactly what I got to use on my a6300. I'm really happy with both of them!

    • @LinaForrestal
      @LinaForrestal 5 років тому

      the sony 35mm 1.8 is the first lens I bought for my a6300! it's SOLID AF. its my go to when I know I need to nail a shot!

  • @Julian-yk1sx
    @Julian-yk1sx 3 роки тому +1

    New subscriber here. Thanks for the video. Used your link and so I'm getting this and the 16 1.4. I can't wait to use them. I have the a6400 so I need all things a6400 related.

  • @patrickc8740
    @patrickc8740 5 років тому +4

    I always tell people when they are picking out lenses to think what they would use them for, what situations, how close is the subject, is it large or small, etc. For example, how useful is a long range telephoto in close quarters. Or, how useful is a super wide angle at a baseball game. Sure, arguably you still could get interesting photos depending what shot you’re going for. I heard one photographer once say, “zoom lenses for day, fixed primes for night,” and i always thought that was a fairly solid idea. I find myself in so many situations always thinking “DAMN, if only I had one more stop of light!” So I tend to lean towards primes, haha.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      Absolutely love this! Thanks for sharing!

  • @RiseHigh
    @RiseHigh 6 років тому +3

    Oh yeah it's massive! Even more on an apsc body.. But til i really love having 24 / 35 / 50 / 70 prime Lens quality in one Lens, i don't know what to get.. Of course for UA-cam talking stuff it's too much, but for client work for events / weddings it's an insane Lens to have i guess!

  • @shadostorm8375
    @shadostorm8375 3 роки тому +2

    Fantastic review bro. I would like to get this too for my A6400

  • @adrielt
    @adrielt 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for the video you made me decide to buy this. Was suppose to buy the new Tamron 17-70mm but it is out of my budget. Still this new lens of mine is way better than the kit lens 16-50mm. I like the bokeh I get when I zoom in. And for some reason I noticed the micro jitters when shooting 4k w/my a6400 is gone. It was so bad before. Thanks again

  • @Hugo19ist
    @Hugo19ist 6 років тому +7

    I have the Sony 6500 and the Sony 18-105 F4 for about 2 months and I love it, I use it for car photography and videos and is amazing.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      That’s great Hugo! I just took that same combination on a trip and it was great!!

    • @forneverarrow
      @forneverarrow Рік тому

      I couldn’t agree more with the title! The 18-105mm f4 G is permanently mounted on my a6000. I am shooting 90% of the time in urban environments (street photography and cityscapes) and the versatility of this lens lefts nothing to be desired. It ticks all the three of my must have boxes: build quality, fast and accurate focus mechanism and constant aperture.
      And a tip: the image quality can be superb at infinity only by MF. I thought that this lens was pretty soft for far subjects (like landscapes or cityscapes) but after some experimentation with MF I managed to shoot images that rivals my other Zeiss prime lenses! While for closer focus distances or portraits the AF is 100% accurate, to infinity struggles heavily and this is maybe a reason for the inconsistent score on various reviews in terms of sharpness. But, no, this lens is very sharp if you can achieve correct focus (I have very high keeper rate with MF, is very smooth in this lens).

  • @sarahlujan
    @sarahlujan 4 роки тому +11

    Sony, give this guy money. I think I'm buying this lens just because I fell in love with him. [SWOON]

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  4 роки тому +1

      Haha thanks! Feel free to use those affiliate links in the description! 😉

    • @Lizzzzzzy921
      @Lizzzzzzy921 10 місяців тому

      @@dunnadiditdamn bro you better be in them DMs with legendary fizz I don't think I have ever seen a girl flirting with any Sony tube douchers

  • @DOTA2OnlineTV
    @DOTA2OnlineTV 3 роки тому

    Just ordered now from JB Hifi... gona pick it up by Monday ... super excited :D just subs in ur channel... great informative video :D

  • @Transformaster
    @Transformaster Рік тому +2

    Just scored this lens on ebay open box for 370 dollars and got it today. Things a BEAST

  • @lukasz4505
    @lukasz4505 4 роки тому +3

    I really wanted the Sony E 16-55mm 2.8 G for the amazing quality that it produces, it’s the price that is as you said, “arm and a leg.” I’m looking to have this as a versatile travel lense for travels, some landscape. Would you recommend this for landscape photography?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  4 роки тому

      It would definitely be a great option for both landscape and for an all-around lens. Obviously pretty expensive but it’s a solid lens.

    • @lukasz4505
      @lukasz4505 4 роки тому +2

      @@dunnadidit I meant to ask if the 18-105 would be a good choice/alternative. I've seen some vloggers use it for their travel, just wanted to see if it's good for landscapes as well. I also have a sigma 1.4 16mm as my secondary lense.
      Just putting it out there, love the channel it's always the go to when I need some photography questions answered thanks for that!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  4 роки тому +1

      I love the 18-105. I used it almost exclusively when travelling. F2.8 would be nice but not necessary outside most of the time.

  • @andyevansoccasionalrandomn4498
    @andyevansoccasionalrandomn4498 6 років тому +6

    Dunna, great video. One lens...so tough. I thought my Zeiss 16-70 f4 would be my one and only but the f4....I'm really enjoying the Sigma 16mm f14 and just recently received the Sigma 30mm f14 for my birthday. I'm going to go out on limb here and say that if i had to choose one it would be the 30mm. I think the length is workable, i.e. if you want closer to the subject then move closer, and further, move further, also the f14 is beast mode! #instagramnotificationsquad get some!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      WOOOOOOO! LOVE MY #INSTAGRAMNITIFICATIONSQUAD !!! Yeah the 30 is a close second for me for sure. That thing is a beast for sure. I really wanna try that 16-70 though!

    • @gioortiz8459
      @gioortiz8459 3 роки тому

      Other than price is there any reason why I might wanna go with the 30 instead of 16? Been thinking about purchasing the 16 and im just hoping it’s the right decision lol

    • @Raymont99
      @Raymont99 3 роки тому

      @@gioortiz8459 kinda depends on what you wanna do. Architecture and Landscape -> 16 mm | Portrait and stuff like that -> 30mm

  • @LoveGetsSweeterWeddingVideos
    @LoveGetsSweeterWeddingVideos 5 років тому +2

    Super helpful actually. I'm going to hire this lens and see if I prefer all primes or if this would be a handy zoom to have! The f4 was putting me off as I shoot weddings and family sessions so may need some better low light capabilities...

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +2

      Yeah the only issue I have with it is the low light performance but it’s not as bad as you’d think!

  • @Cdinkha86
    @Cdinkha86 4 роки тому

    Great video! Would you recommend this lens for travel photography (landscape, portrait, etc,.)

  • @maxlarenas
    @maxlarenas 6 років тому +3

    This was my only one lens for 6 months with my A6500 and it was awesome worth for value considering this is a 2013 ish lens

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Totally agreed! I rocked this one for quite some time! Literally 70% of my videos were filmed with this lens.

    • @BigBoss-gb4cx
      @BigBoss-gb4cx 5 років тому

      What do you use instead of it now?

  • @SorrenAveria
    @SorrenAveria 4 роки тому +3

    Will the 18-105mm remember the focal length when I turn off my camera and turn it on again?

  • @KW-fy9it
    @KW-fy9it Рік тому

    Thank you for a great video review

  • @syafiraffi8424
    @syafiraffi8424 3 роки тому

    Awesome review for this lens!

  • @obiecolumbus1568
    @obiecolumbus1568 6 років тому +4

    Dunna, is this lens the equivalent of the Canon 18-135mm?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      Similar. Sony also has an 18-135 that’s newer and super sharp but has a changing aperture. I think that might be more similar.

    • @Princeton_James
      @Princeton_James 4 роки тому +1

      @@dunnadidit do you think the Sony 18-135 is better than the Sony 18-105?

    • @burrito_san
      @burrito_san 4 роки тому

      Dunna Did It I am also curious about this

    • @longphung1499
      @longphung1499 4 роки тому

      @@dunnadidit Could you make a video about Sony 18-135?

  • @twiceviceasnice
    @twiceviceasnice 5 років тому +4

    Sigma 18-35 + canon 50 1.8 stm + sigma mc-11 and 18-105 f4

  • @georgeholliday123
    @georgeholliday123 6 років тому +1

    Love how much your channel has blown up man!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      George!!! So good to see you in the comments section! Thank you so much dude! I really wanna see that incredible music bus of yours some day!

    • @georgeholliday123
      @georgeholliday123 6 років тому +1

      Dunna Did It really hope you can do !! I’ll have it in the states some day. Let me know if you’re ever in Europe and we’ll make it work!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      Definitely! And let me know if you ever end up in Canada with it too 😁

  • @bismillahfoodsecrets2671
    @bismillahfoodsecrets2671 4 роки тому +1

    Greetings from Alberta Canada 🇨🇦, Great convincing review , I am gonna buy one of these lens

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  4 роки тому

      Greetings back at you from Edmonton!

  • @EricMakingWaves
    @EricMakingWaves 4 роки тому +4

    I basically hate the way everyone does every video review ever. But I like this one. You don't seem like a sell-out douche. And I can appreciate that.

  • @iBoredization
    @iBoredization 5 років тому +5

    i had the 18105g before. Sold it and got myself the 1670z instead. The 18105 was just heavy

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      How do you like the 16-70?

    • @GRJCLyon
      @GRJCLyon 4 роки тому +3

      The 18-105 literally weighs nothing. If people think that’s heavy they need to do some push ups or something. Throw a 70-200 g2 lens on a body then let’s talk heavy.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  4 роки тому

      Haha yeah it’s really not a heavy lens

  • @brandenedge223
    @brandenedge223 2 роки тому +1

    Dunna your videos are awesome! Super genuine and insightful! Just subbed! Hey for an a6000 In (2022) dated I know but on a budget lol… do you think this Sony 18-105 or the new sigma 18-50? I would get the sigma but the oss and reach of the Sony makes me question it! Mainly for video ! Thanks man!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  2 роки тому

      Oss makes me want to say 18-105 I think

  • @mikeseps
    @mikeseps 2 роки тому +2

    Oh look, I'm back here. Contemplating swapping out my 16-55 f/2.8 for this lens. Why? Because the added reach (almost double) is becoming more of a thing as I'm getting more into sports photography / videography (disc golf, mostly). Thanks, Dunna, you're a continuing source of knowledge for so many of us.

  • @hyongminlee8881
    @hyongminlee8881 6 років тому +3

    Sigma 16mm! Because I shoot my dog and need to be up close and wide! Also clear optical zoom helps

  • @mohsin_sait
    @mohsin_sait 6 років тому +3

    Looks like a good one.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +2

      It’s a banger for surrrrreeeeee!!! (Sorry, too much coffee)

    • @mohsin_sait
      @mohsin_sait 6 років тому +1

      Dunna Did I'd be that excited if I had one too, with or without coffee.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  6 років тому +1

      Haha so true 😉

  • @mithun6669
    @mithun6669 4 роки тому

    Good presentation 👏 one question with app you using for editing which shown here 🤔 is it light room?

  • @samuelxu5222
    @samuelxu5222 4 роки тому +1

    considering purchasing a7r4 recently! think it might be a good lens for both still and video since 4k in a7r iv is in super35 crop mode, and the 26mp crop mode is good enough. is it a good choice, paired with the fe20mm 1.8g? fairly good video though

  • @stevekdigitalworx
    @stevekdigitalworx 5 років тому +3

    I've now binge watched 4 of your reviews, so now I feel comfortable asking my question. I'm brand new to photography beyond point/shoots and my phone. So new I haven't even bought the camera yet (Doing that on Friday). I had already decided that I was getting the 18-105 for my versatile lens, so this video just solidified that decision. Where I'm in purchase paralysis is, I was planning on buying the Sigma 30/1.4 or the 16/1.4 lens. I asked on a FB group what they thought and all I got was it depends on what I like to shoot. I don't have a camera yet... I don't know what I like to shoot. So, as a novice should I stay with only the 18-105, or to add on to your statement in this review, if you could only have TWO lenses, what would they be? Would the 30mm be redundant (except for the better low light performance)? Would the 16mm be a better choice for wide angle shots, again because of the low light performance, or is the 18mm of the 18-105 "good enough" for a beginner?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +3

      Ok... here’s two things...
      1. If it was me - I would do the 18-105 and the 30mm f1.4.
      2. Here’s what I suggest. Get your camera with the 18-105. And then go shoot a whoooolllleeee bunch! If you find yourself at the wide end at 18mm quite often after shooting a bunch, get the 16mm. If you find yourself zooming in a bit, maybe the 30mm. Find out what you are going to shoot most with the versatile lens. And then get a sharper, faster lens at that focal length!
      Hope that helps!

    • @stevekdigitalworx
      @stevekdigitalworx 5 років тому +1

      @@dunnadidit why the 30mm over the 16mm? As far as shooting a bunch to see what I like, I was hoping to take this whole kit (and kaboodle) on my trip to the coast of Spain in a month. I'm kind of in a unique situation that won't allow me to even have my hands on the camera until I'm in Spain (I can DM you on IG if your want to know more).
      Here's what I'm envisioning shooting most at least for this vacation: skyline from charter boat; various buildings; my wife in front of various scenery; my wife indoors; museum stuff indoors.
      I know I could get away with the 18-105 for virtually all of that, but I worry about low light situations, especially in museums and restaurants.

    • @stevekdigitalworx
      @stevekdigitalworx 5 років тому +1

      @@dunnadidit oh, and thank you for answering so quickly.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +2

      I just find the 30mm more useful for what I shoot, but honestly it’s very close with the 16mm. Sounds like the 16mm might actually be better for what you’re looking for!

    • @stevekdigitalworx
      @stevekdigitalworx 5 років тому +2

      @@dunnadidit Thank you! I think I will go with the 16mm. From your reviews and everybody else on the Tube, 16mm just seems so much fun to shoot with. And it gives me something else to buy later! ("Honey, I need this 30mm! Dunna Said So!")

  • @GregorPQ
    @GregorPQ 5 років тому +9

    Only lens on APSC: 85/1.4

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +3

      That’s it? No wide angles?

    • @GregorPQ
      @GregorPQ 5 років тому +4

      If I absolutely have to use wide angles I do but else I use the 85, also for video:
      www.flickr.com/photos/gregorpq/albums/72157662457661246
      ua-cam.com/video/DH4O6OTepe4/v-deo.html
      I also just finished a whole wedding film just with the 85.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      That’s awesome!

    • @yohanngabriel1362
      @yohanngabriel1362 4 роки тому

      which brand? Samyang?

    • @kwenamt2151
      @kwenamt2151 4 роки тому +1

      @@yohanngabriel1362 Sony. The GM85/f1.4 is dynamite in small packaging.

  • @mifune111
    @mifune111 4 роки тому

    Hey Dunna! great videos! I wonder if there is a way to see what focal lenght you are using since ther is no marks on the lens body.

  • @armanrespicio3622
    @armanrespicio3622 5 років тому +1

    the crazy squirrel got you man :) thanks for the review. it helps a lot. God bless!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  5 років тому +1

      Lol! That darn squirrel! 🐿