Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Sony 18-105mm vs Sony Kit Lens
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 сер 2024
- Sony 18-105 on Amazon: amzn.to/2hGVB5V
Sony 16-50 on Amazon: amzn.to/2hGFpSq
Use this link to support the channel [for free!] when you shop on Amazon!: amzn.to/2Iqli4p
M Y G E A R :
Cameras -
📷 WHAT I USE TO RECORD: geni.us/qEib
📷 BACKUP CAMERA: geni.us/eWBG
📷 BEST STARTER/BUDGET CAMERA: geni.us/Ujn1TC3
📷 BEST FULL FRAME FOR THE $$$: geni.us/8PxAj
Lenses -
❤️ MY #1 MOST RECOMMENDED LENS: geni.us/BbGlnB
❤️ BEST PORTRAIT LENS: geni.us/bvwq
❤️ BEST ULTRAWIDE LENS: geni.us/ARXj
❤️ BEST DO-EVERYTHING LENS: geni.us/dDLwY
❤️ WHAT I FILM MY VIDEOS WITH: geni.us/ojGKI
❤️ MY FAVORITE CHEAP/MANUAL LENS: geni.us/cQoztp
Accessories -
🔋🔋 CAMERA BATTERIES: geni.us/TXaeo3B
🎤 AUDIO RECORDER: geni.us/L5dejj
🎤 MICROPHONE: geni.us/O8UzW
⚙️ BEST CHEAP TRIPOD: geni.us/4uf5
⚙️ BEST GIMBAL: geni.us/iYiy
⚙️ SD CARD: geni.us/7BhUrBj
🛒 SHOPPING ON AMAZON? geni.us/yn7t0 (Paid Amazon Link)
🌍 OUTSIDE OF THE US? USE THIS LINK: geni.us/ezoD (Paid Amazon Link)
🎦 MY E-MOUNT PAGE: www.amazon.com...
👧🏼 MY WIFE'S UA-cam: goo.gl/P7D5RW
🖼️ INSTAGRAM: / arthur213
DISCLOSURES:
I participate in the Amazon Affiliates Program, where I earn a small commission if you decide to purchase an item at no cost to you.
I participant in the B&H Affiliates Program, an affiliate advertising program in which I earn commissions by linking to bhphoto.com at no cost to you.
You're the only vlogger who actually recommends the kit lens and you've convinced me to stick with it until I'm a better shooter. Thanks for your insights!
Thanks for all of your videos, makes picking out lens easier than expected. While watching this video and realized you're filming at Okinawa at Jusco. Brings back so much memory back in the days of my beloved Corps. Have a good one.
I had several of Sony Zeiss + G lenses, and kept the 18-105. Love it on my a6300 as a single lens set up.
How it goes regarding stabilization only on lens? Happy?
Thanks for this. You've convinced me that I don't need the 18-105.
I'm sticking with my trusty kit lens and fast primes.
This video proves that the photograph is the most important for the picture's quality.
Correction, a beautiful wife is the most important for the picture's quality.
Vince Patrick, yes its better to stick with kit lens. I have both. if you are a fan of big lenses then buy it else not much difference in picture quality.
@@sb39f3 there is
Ordered the 18-105 from Amazon with my A6400 and the lens was recorgnized by camera. Zoom did nit work and it was just a mess. I sent it back and just reordered same lens from B&H. Waiting to receive this week and we’ll see if this just a single issue or the lens is just crap
arthur i love your all reviews and im going to buy sony 18-105 lens and its not a small different in kit lens and 18-105 its huge different dear. 18-105 is very great lens then kit lens. for me this is THE ONE LENS that sony a series cameras. and this lens can take my UA-cam channel videography to next level. thanks for your good reviews. love you from punjab india.
I'm considering using this lens to replace my 16-50 power zoom, I like the performance along with its versatility. Also, thank you so much for doing all these reviews and videos about the Sony A6000 and accessories!! I love my A6000 and I have been needing a reliable, comprehensive place where I can seek out more information about the A6000, you're awesome! Keep doing what you're doing!!
Can you please do a review on the 16-35 f2.8 Vs the kit lens?
you've got the kit lens and the g lens, what about the g spot?
I love my 18-105. In fact I updated my camera body, sold off alpha mount lenses, and bought new lenses just to have access to this 18-105. I kept finding that there was a gap between my 16-50 and my 70-200 and all too often I wanted to shoot in that gap. Having the lens go all the way out to 105 is great. The lens isn't very heavy either. Attached to my a6500 it makes a great carry around package. This lens serves me about 80-90% of the time. It isn't my sharpest lens but for day to day use it is sharp enough.
I have the kit lens too and use it. The main thing about the kit lens is how small it is. With the kit lens attached to my a6500 it becomes a pocket camera. I can literally slip it into my jacket pocket. The kit lens image quality isn't as good as the 18-105 and of course the zoom range is less but as a run and gun lens it is fine.
I have both of these lenses and they are both great. I also have the 1.8 35mm, brilliant... Also have the 70-200mm f4. With these lenses you can do anything.
The 18-105 F4 G is a little bit sharper to me
and the DxOMark reference score also stated
Just watching this now and yes I agree with you...............so buying the G lens
Thank you for the review. It would add value to take photos for the side by side at the cameras best settings. I get why you synch the settings but realistic side by sides will show photographers potential differences in real shooting.
@Arthur R 18-105 or 18-135 which is better for Photography, Videography, Sharpness, portraits, street photography and Have Better Image quality ?
kindly review about sony 55-210 lens..
thanks :)
You are doing absolutely great videos, don't stop. could you please compare the bokeh from the 18-105 and 35mm 1.8?
Greetings from France
And compare the sharpness too, thanks.
Yes, good idea. There is quite a bit of difference. The more i use the 35mm, the more I like it. It is by far my favorite lens that I have used.
Oh really? As in, themore you use it compared to others? Interesting because I imagine you have used so many lenses...!
I just have the kitlens and a canonFD 50mm 1.8 not super sharp. In the kitlens I love going 20mm for wideangle, but instead of getting the prime 20mm sharper, my money is better spent on the 35mm? will slightly change my photos style, I like that challenge. thanks!
hi man, congratulations for having such a gorgeous wife, (Bless her). I have the chance for a Sigma 30mm 1.4 C for 244$. should I go for it or pay more for the Sony 35? I have a6000 BTW.
I was almost convinced that I would buy 18-105. But now looking for 55-210 lens for extra reach... as my 16-50 kit lens produces almost same quality image in that focal range...
Thanks for your video. :)
Great as always. Can you compare 18-105 vs 16-70 Z vs kit lens?
want to know too
Thanks so much for this review!!! Your comparison kit lens vs 16mm f2.8 review also really helped. I mostly shoot video on the a6300, with sigma primes and although the lenses are great for photography, I've found major issues with auto focus breathing on 19mm and 30mm and wasn't sure what I should do....... After seeing your reviews, I thought I'd ignore the pixel peepers and I went out and bought this lens. I've been shooting on a gimbal mostly at 16mm with this new lens and I'm really happy with the results! Phase detection auto focus and OSS are awesome! So much for such a low price! Again many thanks TECHNOLOGY MAFIA, you're a legend!!!
I believe you have the best reviews from any other i have seen... Thanks and kind regards...
Thanks Oddiraju . I bought the Neewer 35mm f1.7 manual focus lens. I am happy with it. and also it was affordable. I also bought the Sony 55-210mm zoom lens as I needed greater reach. Happy with the zoom lens too.
Great video! I really enjoy your camera channel and this is a lense review I was graving for!
How does the g lense perform for portrait in the 70mm-100mm range? Could you extend the review in that direction, also comparing with the 50mmf1.8?
I have a A6300 and E PZ 18-105 F4 G for shooting video.
Works perfect and I love to play with it!
Nice video and I subscribed :-P
Sigma 16mm f1.4 vs sony E 18-105 G please.
My budget not allow me to buy both lenses, can’t decide which one should I buy.
Greeting from indonesia.
Terimakasih
Finally bought 18-105G. Awesome lens!
Great vid. I'd like to see a comparison of that 18-105 vs Zeiss 16-70.
I did it and the 18/105 clearly wins it. I could send you the testfotos of both lenses.
I'm Vincent I have both and the Zeiss is much sharper
TheGreatGandalf09 Zeiss is much sharper than the G any day
Studat Zeiß has huge differences in the series. In my case the Zeiss is much blurrier than the Sony especially at open aperture f4. I send it to Sony and they said it is in the tolerance of the 16/70. On the other hand my Sony 18/105 is very sharp and defeats the Zeiss in the direct test. In many forums the Zeiss is discussed due to this great variation of quality with the 16/70. Maybe you have one of the better ones.
Studat that's not what i saw. In portrait, it was slightly better zoomed up. But it bleeds when you zoom up on trees to blue sky. It made lines better on his video of a tennis court. Slightly better coloring on grass. But a jerky full zoom, which was an issue.
I didn't see a 300.00 difference for Zeiss myself, and neither did this guy here.
Now, what about very low light? No one has reviewed them side by in very low light...that's why I wanted the Zeiss, myself, but it's GOT to hold up in low light, not bleed colors and not hitch in video. Inexcusable for a thousand $$ German lens.
I have Sony A6000 and I love to capture nature (mountain, river, etc), city or maybe landscape. what is the best lens for my camera? do I need the 18-105mm lens or...?
Great compare and thanks for show another side of 18-105, I plan to buy it but i have to more consider about it
im going for 18105 sony lens its best for my you tube videos
Just bought this lens (18-105) after your review for my 6300 - cannot wait to try it out properly!
Not sure how I came upon your channel...but you really provide an excellent comparison and very unbiased review. Thanks for helping me make some future decisions, the immediate one of purchasing the 18-105, having had great luck so far with the 16-50. Whereas I have a few friends that highly recommended the 16-70, I needed more reach for event photography.
Had the 18-105 for many years.Hope one day Sony makes this exact lens with better quality optics.
Nice balanced comparision u have done between these two lens...
Thanks for the comparison. I found it really useful, as I wondered myself whether to buy a 18-105 G Lens as I wish myself a lens with some tele, good aperature and a good quality of photos..
But this video made me a little more satisfied with my 16-50 Kit, as my budget is not that huge at all..
Well, this video tricked you...
There is a big difference
love this video carnt wait for my a6000 at Christmas 😊
Awesome! Merry Christmas!
Kallam Gainer I'm getting it too. I can't wait either. What photos are you trying to take photos of. I mainly want to do night/astrophotography
Same hear becuse I do alot of urbex and sport photography
a6000 is awesome! You won't regret it! Make sure you do the firmware update and get an SDXC card for the high bitrate video.
What dose the firmware update do ??
great video as always!
but, i notice the difference that make 18-105mm worth the price. if you check the center point, sure, they both are comparably sharp. but, moving to the side of the image, the 18-105mm is sharper (see the image with A&W sign, you'll notice it as well)
well, your comparison shows that 16-50mm is no slouch ... i dunno, but i think i prefer the 16-50mm color right off the camera. more warm looking images.
thanks!! going to make my purchase with the kit lens! it's no garbage as everyone else says (except photo/video show, and a couple of other youtube channel that recommend the kit lens)
You are right, it is surprisingly not bad. I expected the kit lens to perform much worse, but it did well.
Thanks sir
Awesome video! The kit lens seems hard to beat for general use. Think I would use the extra cash towards a couple of primes...
I actually see on my iPad in the 1080p setting a huge difference. The 16-50 was the reason I returned my a5100. I wanted something compact so a good small lens was a must. So I'm sticking with my RX100 for now which was superior to the a5100+1650 combo. I'm not saying the a5100 is worse, the kit lens made it worse.
Arthur, I've been getting schooled on gear and lenses for my a6400. I am using the 16-50 kit for video but I like to shoot my son in sports. I'm looking at this lens, the sigma 24-105 from sigma or maybe I just should have gotten the 18-135 kit? Thanks and good work on the progress of your videos.
Maybe wait for the new 70-350mm.
@@ArthurR thanks dude. Keep it up.
I think the 55-210mm could keep me satisfied for $75/ used as well...??
Arthur....Iam from India.... great comparison...I recently purchased an A6400 SONY with kit lens ..Thanks a lot for ur videos...Looking forward for more ....
Great video, thank you. I have an A6000 and an A7ii both with kit lenses and they both give good results. Else where on the net people don't like this lens but your review was very informative and just what I needed to know. Nice to see your channel is growing and your wife is involved as well.
Been watching your videos over the past week or so as I have recently purchased an A6000, was hoping to get my canon lenses to work, bought the sigma adaptor, sadly, very slow on the A6000. However, I have been considering this lens, and think I might purchase, thank you so much for all your info.
I literally bought this lens an hour before your review. Tomorrow will be my first day shooting with it. I just checked the weather and of coarse there is a 60% chance of showers at Disney.
How's the lens holding up ?
It would be nice if you compared the sharpness on both lenses wide open and stopped down at 1:1 both in the corners and centers. That's what I'm most curious about personally.
Okinawa!!!! I was watching this video randomly and I was like wait.... that scene looks familiar...its Mihama!!
I settled for the Zeiss 16-70mm f4 instead of this. It was way too large. The only issue I had with the Zeiss I'd the f4. The kit zoom lens is kind of soft all around. The rating is not so great with the reviewers. Got myself a Sigma 30mm f1.4 for indoor instead of the power zoom.
Good choice with the Sigma, that is an awesome lens. I have yet to test the zeiss. How do you like it?
TechnologyMafia the Zeiss 16-70mm is great. It's much more versatile than the 18-105mm. I'm not a pro nor have both lens to compare, but I would think the Zeiss would outperform the Sony. It's a bit more expensive as well. It's a little soft at the short end and the far end wide open, I'm sure it's the same with most of the zoom lens. Now I'm debating between the Sony 20mm f2.8 or the Sigma 19mm f2.8. One is small and one has better IQ.
Please, please please do a test of 18-105 f4 on your A7 in only full frame mode in regards to sharpness(chart), bokeh & distortion(will require manual correction in Lightroom)
I was sketchy about the kit lens but I’ve been stopping down and I’ve been getting really sharp images ,, still considering the 18 - 105 and a 70-200 on my apcs
I love your review, all are very insightful and precise. I am planning to buy Sigma 16 mm F1.4 lens for multipurpose use (indoor, landscape and bit portrait) since its very sharp and perform well in low light and produce good blurring effect at 1.4F. I bit confused with Sony 18-105 F4, got one used 18-105 F4 in lesser price than Sigma. Could you please suggest me which one will be more beneficial?
The Sigma 16mm will be a much sharper lens. It will not give you the versatility to zoom in 105mm though. With the Sigma you have to zoom with your feet. Personally, I like primes more than zoom lenses because of their size and sharpness.
@@ArthurR go for sigma 30mm1.4
Hi, Your videos are very useful. I have Sony Alpha mark 3 which kind of lens is bette to buy. I like sharper photos with focused backround. Thats mean I like to my photo the backround is sharp too. Thanks.
Just noticing you're in Okinawa haha. I'm currently here. I saw the Ferris wheel and was like "is that American village?" haha awesome.
Sony APS-C general purpose zoom upgrades are a frustrating category, mostly because the kit lens is so great. I use the hell out of the kit lens - its a featherweight, focuses great and never takes a bad picture. The upgrade options are always an unexciting compromise in size, cost, and/or quality.
Wow. Thanks for not over-hyping the g lens. Everyone else seems to give it their highest recommendation. Those side by side photos were basically identical! I might still go for it just to consolidate my kit. Thanks for the review!
This video is 3 years old... The 18-105 has got many updates.. so now the lens is much sharper en better then the kit lens.
@@wiardvdberg Hey, thanks for the info. I ended up buying it awhile back and it's by far my favorite lens of all time! I'm very happy with the image quality and the range is incredible.
@@JohnDennery Haha very nice man!
@@wiardvdberg what do you mean by updating the lens ? do you mean software or the manufacturing process ?
The first major lens purchase i intend to make after i finish saving and buy a camera is the 18-105, facts!
Excellent video, just bought this lens. Also bought the Pentax 50mm f1,4 on your recommendation, very happy with both.Do you have any videos on the types of filters you would use with these lenses,especially a polarizer? Thank you,enjoy your work.
Good video. I have the Sony a6000 with kit 16-50. I am thinking have a little more zoom. What are you recommend to buy? The Sony 18-105 or keep the kit and buy the lens 55-210? Thanks!
Truxo if you use your camera for video buy the 18-105
18-105 nice for all around lens.
Thanks man, you convinced me that I don't need this big lens. However, something that I cannot ignore regarding the 16-50 is the build quality.. The internal barrel wobbles so much while extended, the toggle looks like it's about to fall off, quite horrible tbh, and this step motor sound... Not even the 16-70 mm Zeiss lens seems to have good quality, you may be lucky or you may not, while buying that one..
Love your comparison videos. Just bought the 18-105, waiting to get it. You are lucky to have such a great model for your shots! I have to use my cat as my model. But someday, cat Calendar! Ka Ching!
Sony finally gave us exactly what you were asking for in your review with the 24-70 f/2.8 GM. The only problem is it costs $2,000 ....
..For you maybe
@@roddywhite4161 It's a problem for "prosumers." It's obviously not an issue if you're a pro / commercial photographer -- though why would a pro / commercial photographer be shooting on an asp-c sensor in the first place.
Please compare 16-70 f4 zeiss vs 18-105 f4 vs kit
wonderful video and I appreciate for your detailed comparison between two Lenses. Thanks alots.
I'm saving all your videos offline so I can catch up with your liiiife happy holidays from Rwanda 🇷🇼 keep up the good work!!
Again, nice comparison!!
Great video comparison!! I'm an avid traveler. I can't seem to find a nice size camera bag that can fit my a6000 with the 18-105mm attached to it. I would like a decent size bag where i can put in and take out easily while on the go. Do you have one that you use or can recommend? Thanks!
www.ebay.com/itm/Manfrotto-NX-Shoulder-Bag-III-for-CSC-Camera-GRAY-NEXT-Collection-14L-MB-NX-SB-/273138636588
Thanks for this review, I needed something wider than the kit lens with my new A7 II, but no one has the 18-105 in stock here in the U.K. so I'll keep hunting around for a few months.
You live in Oki! I was there for 2 years. Great vids btw.
Great video, When the new 18-105mm comes please compare with kit lens. thanks
Thanks for doing these comparisons with the kit lens. Kit lens for life.
Great video! 18-105 will be my next purchase when my budget allows.
How it goes the stabilization on video with that A6000?
Thanks, great info. Now I know I don't have much use for this lens with my needs.
hi
sony sel 18-105mm f4 vs canon 24-105mm f4 l ?
Hi sir pls reply for me
Which lens is best for photography and videography
18-105 f4 sony
Or
Tamron 18-300 f 3.5-6.3
Would love to have you post about options in adapters to mount older lenses. That is something that brought me to switch to the Sony line, but it seems like there is a vast variety of adapters and options available. Can you help out with this please?
Your video was very helpful. I'm going to be starting my own show on UA-cam and I just bought the a 6500 which will be my primary camera. Would you recommend this lens for my One Stop Shop or is there another lens you can recommend? That constant aperture is very appealing
Great review! Can you do a comparison of the 18-105 and 35f1.8 prime lens. I've been eyeing the 35mm as replacement for my a5100's kit lens but after seeing your video, I'm seriously considering the 18-105 as it seems versatile enough to be an all-around lens.
vanquisher23, got both lenses. hard to just pick one. but if you're budget strapped and don't mind the extra size then get only the 18-105 as the range and versitility makes it fun. the 35/1.8 is great and better IQ of course, but at times a I want the wider angle or the telezoom. but the 35 is more compact of course and is very usable as a walk around. you can shoot one handed easily. the 18-105 get heavy after awhile to shoot one handed.
You cannot beat the 35 f1.8 for image quality: it comes out with very shallow DOF and the focus is super fast. And for low light, you cannot beat this lens. I use the 18-105 for events where I can't move fast enough to get to where I need to be. The image quality is really good but not excellent.
I started with the 35 f1.8 for a year and only got the 18-105 for the reason above.
hi can you drop some light on comparison between sony 18-200 or 18-105mm IQ. It will be mostly used for travel n street photography. Also can we use digital zoom after 105 range to compensate the reach of 200mm.
18-105 Sony lens oh
Tamran 17-70 which one is the better?
If you can do a comparison between 18-105 and 16-70. 16-70 is smaller in size. I had both but not at the same time. 18-105 is cheaper than 16-70, but 16-70 is much smaller and lighter in weight.
please do the Sony 18-105g f4 comparison with Zeis 16-70z f4, which is better? is there any more sharp zoom lens?
great video, just wondering if the image quality is about the same with the kit lens wouldn't that make the 55-210 become more value for money?
Can you compare this 18-105 with the 55-210 in terms of the sharpness?
Thanks for the review. That lens is really much larger than the kit 16-50 (at least 4 x larger). My main concern with the 18-105 it just just does not look right on a a6300 series camera (front heavy too?).
Haha yes, and when you add the lens hood to the end, it looks like you are a sports photographer :) It is a large lens, but not outrageous.
Great video, been waiting for the 18-105mm. Now, when are you going to review the Fujinon 14.5-45mm T2.0 Premier?
If anyone wants to donate funds for me to purchase it, i will do it!
Hello, I am considering the 18-105, I’m especially interested in the wide open performance at the long end, in the range from 85 to 105mm. Would you be so kind to share a couple of raw images taken wide open at the long end? Two pictures that in your opinion show the maximum potential of the lens. I would be awesome if you could,
Great video Arthur, thank you so much it really helped me a lot. Although I have a question If you were to go to Mongolia for filmmaking locals living in tents, hunting with eagles, riding horses. What would be your lens choice for APS-C camera? Sigma 30mm f/1.4 + sony e 18-105mm f/4 or something else? maybe only sigma 24-70mm f/2.8?
Hey, I'm an amateur photographer considering this camera. Is the kit lens decent enough to use for landscapes? If not, I can just use my wide angle bridge camera for that stuff.
Hello! A6300 with kit lens or A6000 with 18-105 f/4 is better for videos? Thanks
Ordered the 18-105 from Amazon with my A6400 and the lens was not recorgnized by camera. Zoom did not work and it was just a mess. I sent it back and just reordered same lens from B&H. Waiting to receive this week and we’ll see if this just an isolated issue or the lens is crap
Any update on that? did it work?
TM, I am enjoying your video reports emmensely.
I am a newbie and bought an a6500 for the coming Eclipse, with the 18-105 & 70-300.
This last lens is rather special from my recent tests with the sun and moon, hand held.
I would like to know what software you use for your side-by-side reviews.
TIA. Brad
What camera are you using for this video? Very clean.
Do you have any suggestions for an upgrade from the kit lens without breaking the bank?
Nice review, you hit all my questions. Thanks
Para grabar videos, me recomiendas comprar el 18-105 si dispongo del 16-50 del kit?
Hey! thanks for the video. Im between buying this lens or some primes like the sigmas 19-30-60mm. I shoot primary landscapes and some travel photography at cities, what you recommend the most? Thanks
thanks for all ur videos.. I am newbie; u saved me few bucks by convincing me to go for Sony a6k instead of a DSLR.. would it be possible for u to do a video on 55-210 zoom lens or suggest me if there is any other better zoom lens?
Hi I am bit confused between 18-105 vs 55-210 which is best in terms of quality of pictures?
Hi , I'm not a phtographer, just a beginner & love to shot nature or anythings ...last year august 2019 I bought a Sony Mirrorless a6000 ...now I'm planning to buy len & the store recommend either Sony len Sel 18-135 , Sel 18-105 , Sel 18-200 or Sel 55-210 ...my choice is Sony Sel 18-135 , is this a heavy len ? Pls advice me ...waiting for your reply ....thk you.....12/11/2020
wait, what about *sharpness?* How do they compare?
Is it good enough to bring the 18-105 , 35 , 50 for a wedding shoot
Yes, although you will probably use the 50 the most if it is an outdoor wedding.
I have sony zve10 & sigma 30mm 1.4 & my purpose is to make videography & photography can you please suggest is there is any lenses that i need to buy ?