Get concentrated knowledge from books into 15 minutes summaries by signing up at www.blinkist.com/sciencephile to get unlimited access for 1 week to try it out!
There's no way he just said "oh and your consciousness could collapse the entire universe by just being aware of it" and then said "now let's get into the actually deep stuff"
@@mnoypoiuyt65r4w8 Basically What he is trying to say is that the universe does not “allow” an observer( Humans) to see the fabric of reality, because if we understood how the universe functioned fundamentally then we would have the ability to manipulate reality which would give us the power to destroy the universe. However, going back to “allow”, the universe is not allowing or stopping any action, it is simply impossible for consciousness to be aware of those concepts now or forever.
oh boy i can’t wait to major in quantum chicken nuggets Update: I just got accepted into a PhD program for experimental physics (my thesis will be quantum chicken NUGGES)
In the physics community, if you're looking for a more in depth explanation of these topics we typically recommend something called a 4 year Bachelor's degree (hopefully that's "much longer" enough for you.
The observer effect is exactly like when your computer doesn't work until someone comes to check it out to fix it and it somehow magically fixed itself :')
Just to clear up know that "observing" doesn't mean to just look at it. Observing something like an electron requires us to hit it with some sort of wavelength. It literally interferes. It's not like the universe knows when you're peeking at it.
Well I spoke with Universe this morning and he said that he absolutely knows when we peek at it. And that he’s going to be keeping a real close watch on you in particular in the future.
I like to think of multi universe theory like someone looking down a mirrors facing each other, the further it goes down the more things look slightly different. If you go far enough the possibilities are quite literally endless because each instance sparks another.
The joke has always been on us. We are arrogant enough to believe we can tame nature. That's pretty damn funny. Nature doesn't care if we succeed or fail or that we even exist. Once we understand that better we will have tough decisions to finally make instead of passing the buck.
Correction for a very common misunderstanding, OBSERVING in quantum mechanics means INTERACTING with the object, it's not the fact that there is a CONSCIOUS OBSERVER LOOKING at the wave that makes it collapse, but the fact that there is PHYSICAL STUFF INTERACTING WITH IT, in this case photons.
Yeah, I kinda forgot about that... It's REALLY weird how things behave weirdly, but when you say "okay, then show me how you do it!" It will just go "Nah". It's almost like when you do something really hard or weird, and you keep doing it, and when you say "HEY MA, LOOK WHAT I CAN DO!" suddenly, you keep failing. And when you give up and she goes back, you try again and you naik it again.
The Observer Effect always makes me feel incredibly unsettled because that implies that somehow the universe can tell that something is being observed enough for it's behavior to change. There are so many layers to that onion and I want to peel back exactly none of them because I'm terrified of what I'll find.
"observing" in the context of QM isn't what it means in casual conversation, it means that something is directly interacting with the particle. It doesn't just "feel" that a conscious observer is looking at it, but instead it's just affected by the photon we have to "throw" at it in order to "see" it
Observer effect is just saying in order to observe something, photons have to be thrown at them, right. But photons carry energy (e = mc'2 ) so therefore particles fall out of their superposition, or their state/location is adjusted due to the energy gained, thus humans cannot truly observe something in its natural state
That's not how it's actually work i believe. I recommend watch sabine hossenfelder video for better understanding, the title is "consciousness and quantum mechanics"
I recognized it as well and immediately had an existential crisis in the first intervention but I guess that's what happens on this channel anyways so it fits the theme :D
Note how the usual background tune becomes more unclear and static the more you go down. That to not just at end but through out the video. Applaud for the details man.
If you haven’t checked it out, look up everywhere at the end of time. Interesting stuff and depending on the person it will make you a certain level of sad
There’s one thing that was left out that might be at the deepest level. It’s called “Penrose-Hameroff theory of quantum consciousness.” And it really gets interesting the more you look into it and think about what we know of our university/reality.
And that floor is made of virtual particles appearing every trillion Nano second making string, so the floor is actually made of 11 dimensional strings in a 2d way.
Yo, got chills from that quantum suicide thing because that's a thought I've had. Everyone who dies just wakes up in a universe where they survived. I had also wondered to what extent the splitting timelines goes. Crazy stuff.
Shit I thought about that while playing Undertale earlier and was like “what if I’m god and Frisk is just a normal kid confused as hell as to why they’re coming back?” Could be in another universe I suppose
There is no difference between your consciousness and other consciousnesses. What you perceive as "my mind, my continuity of experience" is an illusion. You've drawn a box around that which there is no reason to. You do not go to a timeline where you survive. You can still die from your perspective. Your "box" is fake and is not privileged.
Tbh the "One Electron Universe" theory sounds extremely interesting to me. What if the cycle of the universe in a big circle where after the time everything starts to decay the electron travels back in time to start the whole cycle again? Like that one episode from Futurama where they travel so far into the future they eventually witness the creation of the universe. Twice. So the universe doesn't start from nothing because there already was something there that wasn't there in the beginning.
@@perk-3028 how could there be only one electron there is no way superposition could allow all the atoms in the entire universe to have only one electron
@@gugancapuzzi1855 for me the album was literally almost like that one aspect of yourself that you would never want to accept and to say that its a freaky album is pretty much an horrifyingly damned understatement on my part
So what I've learned is that quantum physics is essentially the universe's magic hat-trick book and every time one tries to observe it closely, the universe effectively just puts it's hands over the words and gives you the stink eye till you look away.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 I mean unless you have demonstrable proof you can't really claim it to be false. Just like we can't say it's true unless we find genuine proof of it. As it stands it's still a scientific theory, neither true or false until we find further answers.
And the bible was convincing because people didn't understand where we came from. Give it a few years will you. We didn't do this shit for more than 100 years and you're already clinging on to an unfalsifiable hypothesis.
Perhaps when the engine was built, the creators did not predict us getting to the stage of being able to observe things such as a single electron, so now they are frantically trying to make an update before we find exploits and bugs to do with it
That would take a massive amount of coding and energy to do, since you'd have to make every individual particle and code what it does, how it interacts, and making it vanish.
@@watchmychannelorelse My point has nothing to do with the code/amount of work required to do anything. I'm only pointing out that it's an extremely common practice in programming to show/enable things in fragments depending on the context. For example, when you're on the page of this video - your computer doesn't download every other video on youtube, it only downloads the one you're currently on.
I just love his explanation of the observer effect; it's like the universe is interacting with us, and choosing to say "fuck off!" while we try to uncover its secrets!
@@ArtamisBot not only the coolest, but also one of the most mind bending ones. In what way could just our observation literally change the behaviour of a particle. Its absolutely crazy and ever since ive heard of this experiment i cant see things the same anymore
incase you're wondering, here's a list of the EATEOT songs he used: A1 - It's Just a Burning Memory A4 - Childishly Fresh Eyes D5 - The Way Ahead Feels Lonely E2 - And Heart Breaks E5 - To The Minimal Great Hidden F7 - Libet's Delay H1 - Post Awareness Confusions L1 - Advanced Plague Entanglements [unknown stage 6 track]
I actually have a theory regarding quantum tunneling and dark energy: What's outside of our universe is no different than what we call a vacuum within. Like blowing a bubble, you can make the bubble as big as you want by adding more air, but the air is no different than the air outside of the bubble, there's just a confined space. Imagine that the universe is just a bubble in the void that has allowed particles to come within reach of each other to create objects like stars and such. Just like a bubble, adding more of what's outside to the inside will make the bubble bigger, and since our universe is expanding clearly something is being added. My theory is that "dark energy" is something that originates outside of our universe, and through quantum tunneling makes it's way into our universe without breaking the seal, and since the universe is big, there's a lot of dark energy that can seep in, and as the universe gets bigger, there will be more and more opportunities for dark energy to quantum tunnel in. This creates the exponential growth.
“If a tree falls in the woods, but there is no one around to hear it, does it still make a sound?” Schrodinger: “It makes a sound and no sound until observed”
Fun fact, one of the songs used in this video is called “A burning memory”, it originates from a 6 hour long album called “Everywhere at the End of Time” by The Caretaker (I think). 1:02 is where a part of the song plays (I think almost all songs in this are made by The Caretaker)
Actually the One-Electron thing may be an interesting interpretation to Heisenberg's uncertainty. What if not only position and momentum are superpositioned, but also time, or even maybe only time is the one that is uncertain? Imagine a particle has time superposition, that would mean that it has diferent "states of time" at the same moment, and that when observed, the universe will chose a random moment in time to manifest. So, the Universe will chose an "A moment" in which the particle has momentum and positions values, or a "B moment" with different values and so on. Its like having a bunch of photographies of different moments in time in your hand and picking up one with your eyes closed.
There actually is an uncertainty relation involving time, except time and energy are the conjugate variables instead of position and momentum. It basically means that quantum states that exist for only a short time can’t have a well defined energy. It should be noted also that that’s not where superposition arises from in quantum mechanics. It has more to do with solutions to the Schrodinger equation, which guides the dynamics of qm
@@taymorrison I think it is important to note that the time-energy uncertainty is not analgous to other types of uncertainties, such as the Heisenberg uncertainty. Long story short, physical observables are mathematically represented by operators, eg. A & B. If A & B commutes, that is [A, B] = AB-BA = 0, then it is possible to find common eigenstates of the state (Not necessarily a wavefunction!). If, however, [A, B] doesn't equal zero, an uncertainty relation will arise. This is not physics, just pure math. The heisenberg uncertainty principle is given by the canonical commutation relation of [Q, P] = -ih/2pi, with Q being a position operator and P the momentum operator. Key note being, that both Q and P represents dynamical variables, i.e. measurebale characteristics of the system at any given time. BUT - time is NOT a dynamical variable (At least not in a non-relatistic theory such as QM). You can't just go out and measure the "time" of a given particle, as you might Q and P. Time is the independent variable of which the dynamical observables are functions. The time associated in the Time-Energy uncertainty is a change in time (DeltaT). This DeltaT is the time it takes for the system to change substantially, or more precisely: The amount of time it takes the expectation value of an operator to change by one standard deviation. And this is entirely dependent on the observable you decide to... well observe. It could be Energy, but it might as well be position, momentum or any other physical observable. So - point being that the Energy-Time uncertainty does not tell us about some fundamental property of states (or particles, if you will), as the Heisenberg uncertainty does, but simply manifests as a consequence of time being the independent variable that all oberservables is a function of.
damn didn't realize yall were actually smart while im over here thinking that eventually we'll just abuse virtual particles and zero-point energy like hell and be matter manipulating *literal gods*
11:09 actually there will never be 0% chance of surviving. Even the death of the Universe because of entropy have a small chance of not happening with the quantum tunneling
@@dioptre, and worst of all, “quantum immortality” doesn’t mean “quantum good health”. I mean, you could theoretically still live with brain damage and without your limbs in a scenario with nuclear war or something
Is it like this? You have cancer. You are supposed to die in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Dead. You are dead. Your family members watched you die. But, wait, your still alive? Nobody watched you die? Due to the chances of you surviving are above 0, you are alive, but everyone watched you die, but also see you alive. In another universe, you are dead. They watched you die. In this universe you are alive and Nobody watched you die. This continues for all eternity until your chances of survival are 0? Idk if I got the concept right but I think of it in this way
*In this video the explanation of the observer effect is simple in comparison with others.I actually learned a great amount of hard topics(basic)in just a 11 minutes video.Thanks*
4:43 I already learned that in school but the way you explained it just made me laugh about the weirdness that we just accepted in school because our teacher told us to
@@imbored5879 *how can idiotic 1 brain cell goes "i know everything guys, i understand everything" Think person think. Is that what u mean?.... Yes, its annoying to hear that from them.
@@imbored5879 scientists know everything about the many worlds interpretation, they made it up themselves without any proof, it's not even a scientific theory. im not sure what you're talking about
I know of one thing deeper down the iceberg. Basically, every virtual particle that falls into a black hole can also be represented by a wave. Its wavelength is the width of its event horizon, and that means that the larger a black hole is, the less energy it loses since light with longer wavelengths has less energy. Since black holes lose their mass in discrete steps (whenever a virtual particle falls in), eventually they reach a mass where a particle with a wavelength of its event horizon would have to have more energy than the black hole itself. Therefore, the black hole stops losing mass and instead remains in existence, without interacting with any other matter in the universe other than with gravity. Kinda like dark matter, don't you think...?
@@piethedye3948 It's extremely important to understand that virtual particles are just that, virtual. They're mathematical artefacts, not actual existing things. Nothing really falls in to the black hole. I realise it's necessary to simplify things to dummies like us, but I was hoping the video would have mentioned this small detail.
As a child I remember asking dear old Pa about quantum mechanics once. He said, "Son, quantum objects are like a woman. They get weird when you watch them and can be both particles (as all physical beings) and waves (when they're yelling at you)." Pa was a little old fashioned.
Gotta say I still liked the old voice more. For some reason - despite it being more robotic - it carried more humor and for some reason it actually appeared less monotone, even though this voice is supposed to be less monotone and more human. Also I think the old voice was more fitting as the channel is called Sciencephile the *_AI_* and the original voice was definitely more AI like and therefore (imo at least) more fitting for the channel name. But that's just my 2 cents.
UA-cam demonetized channels that use robotic voices so he had to adapt the voice to be more human. Unfortunate side effect because he puts in effort in his videos unlike the many channels that just robot read reddit threads for a quick buck.
@@johnfranklin2288 Ah damn well if it's not possible it's not possible :/ I mean i still watch(ed) his videos cause they're well made :3 It's just that I liked the old voice more but yeah. Thanks UA-cam 😒
It represents his transition from a learning AI to an AI that has already studied human interactions and has manufactured a new "common" voice that makes us become more familiar with it. Skynet is evolving really fast.
I love when people rant at me about “wAvE pArTiClE dUaLiTy” somehow allowing themselves to do magic with “intentions” and “manifesting” because of some leap in logic that makes them think nature is conscious and somehow cares to change its properties for them. And they somehow think making this information as loudly announced as possible is the best way to go about things
2:05 It always makes me laugh when people use Schrodinger's Cat to explain Quantum Superposition. Schrodinger himself was very against the idea of superposition and the point of his thought experiment was to prove how ridiculous the idea was (The cat being both dead and alive).
Why does it make you laugh? Schrödinger didn't like it because he didn't believe in it. But he was wrong and the cat paradox is spot on correct. Are you laughing because you wrongly thought the cat paradox was incorrect? If so, I'm laughing back at ya.
Get concentrated knowledge from books into 15 minutes summaries by signing up at www.blinkist.com/sciencephile to get unlimited access for 1 week to try it out!
Kk
The voice .. does not match
Hello daddy! I know I couldn't meet your expectations in learning science. But I am good in history.. and I also have your old voice!
@@Ceylanicus not daddy, is mamma
@@b9318 I am son
There's no way he just said "oh and your consciousness could collapse the entire universe by just being aware of it" and then said "now let's get into the actually deep stuff"
Chim
someone explain this one to me, this ones a doozy.
@@mnoypoiuyt65r4w8 tard here, maybe it’s like “you’re now aware that you’re breathing”
@@mnoypoiuyt65r4w8 Basically What he is trying to say is that the universe does not “allow” an observer( Humans) to see the fabric of reality, because if we understood how the universe functioned fundamentally then we would have the ability to manipulate reality which would give us the power to destroy the universe. However, going back to “allow”, the universe is not allowing or stopping any action, it is simply impossible for consciousness to be aware of those concepts now or forever.
@@justingopaul2018 until i was born
oh boy i can’t wait to major in quantum chicken nuggets
Update: I just got accepted into a PhD program for experimental physics (my thesis will be quantum chicken NUGGES)
Nugges*
Quantum gender studies.
PaTRiAcHY IN INFINITE UNIVERSISES..REEEEEEEEEEE
The nuggets exist in a superposition of being eaten and not eaten.
Somewhere in the infinite parallel universes where another "me" uncover all the secrets of the universe. 🤯
There's a probability that if you don't observe it fast enough it will become a chicken niggets
I want a much longer video that accurately explains these concepts in depth.
This usually is the beginning of a deep dive into the internet meanders
try scienceclic english, their videos on this stuff are super good
@@kero6296 i watch them too :)
In the physics community, if you're looking for a more in depth explanation of these topics we typically recommend something called a 4 year Bachelor's degree (hopefully that's "much longer" enough for you.
@@jimmypizza9854 ok jimmy boy
The observer effect is exactly like when your computer doesn't work until someone comes to check it out to fix it and it somehow magically fixed itself :')
underrated comment
"so what type of scientist are you?"
"..."
"... a quantum chicken nuggeter"
The chicken is both plain AND dipped into sauce until you eat it and collapse the taste function!
I ruined the 299 likes to 300 likes :)
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
@@Phy-zix k so what is related to the comment?
@galaxy laser
Do check it class 12 physics lectures
Everybody be gangsta until Sciencephile starts playing Everywhere At The End Of Time
@@oneofthecancor
*starts to develop dementia
hello mortals
@@oneofthecancor holy shit
I really love how that album has slipped into mainstream.
superdeterminism?
Just to clear up know that "observing" doesn't mean to just look at it. Observing something like an electron requires us to hit it with some sort of wavelength. It literally interferes. It's not like the universe knows when you're peeking at it.
OHhhhhhh that makes more sense.
Well I spoke with Universe this morning and he said that he absolutely knows when we peek at it. And that he’s going to be keeping a real close watch on you in particular in the future.
I like to think of multi universe theory like someone looking down a mirrors facing each other, the further it goes down the more things look slightly different. If you go far enough the possibilities are quite literally endless because each instance sparks another.
Jokes on us, this is at the very top of the iceberg and the rest is stuff we yet don’t understand or can not even comprehend.
Possibly
Its not like we really understand these things either
The joke has always been on us. We are arrogant enough to believe we can tame nature. That's pretty damn funny. Nature doesn't care if we succeed or fail or that we even exist. Once we understand that better we will have tough decisions to finally make instead of passing the buck.
@@LordofSyn we are not different from nature, we also come from the same nature...we are a part of it...
@@LordofSyn so maybe nature is also arrogant...
Correction for a very common misunderstanding, OBSERVING in quantum mechanics means INTERACTING with the object, it's not the fact that there is a CONSCIOUS OBSERVER LOOKING at the wave that makes it collapse, but the fact that there is PHYSICAL STUFF INTERACTING WITH IT, in this case photons.
👌🏻
Need to pin this comment
He did mention that in the video
Thanks a lot, I thought it was weird and was gonna look it up..
Yes this is important. Speed of information is symmetrical to speed of light at maximum because it must travel through a medium.
Yeah, I kinda forgot about that... It's REALLY weird how things behave weirdly, but when you say "okay, then show me how you do it!" It will just go "Nah".
It's almost like when you do something really hard or weird, and you keep doing it, and when you say "HEY MA, LOOK WHAT I CAN DO!" suddenly, you keep failing. And when you give up and she goes back, you try again and you naik it again.
The Observer Effect always makes me feel incredibly unsettled because that implies that somehow the universe can tell that something is being observed enough for it's behavior to change. There are so many layers to that onion and I want to peel back exactly none of them because I'm terrified of what I'll find.
"observing" in the context of QM isn't what it means in casual conversation, it means that something is directly interacting with the particle. It doesn't just "feel" that a conscious observer is looking at it, but instead it's just affected by the photon we have to "throw" at it in order to "see" it
S tier troll
Observer effect is just saying in order to observe something, photons have to be thrown at them, right. But photons carry energy (e = mc'2 ) so therefore particles fall out of their superposition, or their state/location is adjusted due to the energy gained, thus humans cannot truly observe something in its natural state
That's not how it's actually work i believe.
I recommend watch sabine hossenfelder video for better understanding, the title is "consciousness and quantum mechanics"
That's just god being shy
Sciencephile the AI: "Hello mortals"
Me: * watches 10:42 *
Me:
"Well well well..."
"I am uncountable parallel universes ahead of you!"
lol nice one
Really funny 😂😂
So long, and thanks for all the fish.
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
Me: Oh boy another video finally!
Everyone at the end of time: plays
Me: oh
ua-cam.com/channels/MKi8s-KYYlL4TyjtHzZHIw.html
I recognized it as well and immediately had an existential crisis in the first intervention
but I guess that's what happens on this channel anyways so it fits the theme :D
mood
IKR, was waiting waiting waiting
I wonder why he used it
0:51 i love how there is a ghost leaviathin just chilling there
3:01 heisenberg from breaking bad. he said it.
the one who knocks
"Hello mortals" never gets old
But Mortals do tho😳
ua-cam.com/channels/MKi8s-KYYlL4TyjtHzZHIw.html
History keeps getting old and young at the same time ua-cam.com/video/4NyohpZtBbc/v-deo.html
@@Yellow.1844 😳😳😳
It's scary
Note how the usual background tune becomes more unclear and static the more you go down. That to not just at end but through out the video. Applaud for the details man.
It’s not the usual background tune, it’s segments from Everywhere at the End of Time. (The degradation is part of it, it’s not added on in this video)
It's about dementia
If you haven’t checked it out, look up everywhere at the end of time. Interesting stuff and depending on the person it will make you a certain level of sad
@@diedie865 *4x as long
Reminds me of the music in the ending of the shining.
4:32 "no no no " 🤣 i died welp this too funny
There’s one thing that was left out that might be at the deepest level. It’s called “Penrose-Hameroff theory of quantum consciousness.” And it really gets interesting the more you look into it and think about what we know of our university/reality.
Ah yes, the Floor is made out of floor
I wanna collapse reality
I wish i could know everything in the universe
And that floor is made of virtual particles appearing every trillion Nano second making string, so the floor is actually made of 11 dimensional strings in a 2d way.
The floor is made out of everything, and also not
The floor is both the floor and the ceiling until observed
Yo, got chills from that quantum suicide thing because that's a thought I've had. Everyone who dies just wakes up in a universe where they survived. I had also wondered to what extent the splitting timelines goes. Crazy stuff.
Shit I thought about that while playing Undertale earlier and was like “what if I’m god and Frisk is just a normal kid confused as hell as to why they’re coming back?” Could be in another universe I suppose
Hey you, you finally awake
@@Sexoooo skyrim moment
so what happens when u age
There is no difference between your consciousness and other consciousnesses. What you perceive as "my mind, my continuity of experience" is an illusion. You've drawn a box around that which there is no reason to. You do not go to a timeline where you survive. You can still die from your perspective. Your "box" is fake and is not privileged.
Tbh the "One Electron Universe" theory sounds extremely interesting to me.
What if the cycle of the universe in a big circle where after the time everything starts to decay the electron travels back in time to start the whole cycle again?
Like that one episode from Futurama where they travel so far into the future they eventually witness the creation of the universe. Twice.
So the universe doesn't start from nothing because there already was something there that wasn't there in the beginning.
Eternal recurrence.
9:23 ok that actually got me lol
Hello mortals
Sciencephile is the only being that can say this where people are happy about it
Hello DDDE.
@@DeeFeeCee Hello DFC.
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
@@MC-ur6qv Hiya, weeb of the Dragon Ball variety!
I mean I wouldn't be mad if someone called me mortal
OOGA BOOGA BOOGA
switched with the many worlds theory
@@ryscalwis4460 it really doesn't matters but its an interpretation, not a theory
spooky stuff
@Isaac MacKinnon it’s a theory that all the electrons in the universe are the same single electron
@@perk-3028 how could there be only one electron there is no way superposition could allow all the atoms in the entire universe to have only one electron
I love your sense of humor in dark places. Just explained how consciousness breaks reality. Then compared strings to "big dog" beautiful
7:19 I got an ad as soon as he said “shu”
The use of Everywhere at the end of time was a great decision for looking at the iceberg slowly destroying your mind.
Yeah but it freaked me out, that album is scary on a deep level
@@gugancapuzzi1855 for me the album was literally almost like that one aspect of yourself that you would never want to accept and to say that its a freaky album is pretty much an horrifyingly damned understatement on my part
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
i’m so glad i wasn’t the only one who picked up on that
So what I've learned is that quantum physics is essentially the universe's magic hat-trick book and every time one tries to observe it closely, the universe effectively just puts it's hands over the words and gives you the stink eye till you look away.
Sounds right to me, can’t understand the universe till it slips up in some way
OK, but the idea of consciousness collapsing quantum states? PUT IT OUT OF YOUR MIND. It's not true.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 I mean unless you have demonstrable proof you can't really claim it to be false. Just like we can't say it's true unless we find genuine proof of it. As it stands it's still a scientific theory, neither true or false until we find further answers.
@@souventudubanned Actually I stated the opposite of what you claim.
@@thegrandt604 "scientific theory" implies that it has significant evidence supporting it. It is a hypothesis.
Sciencephile the AI isn’t real, no way he can hurt you
Sciencephile the AI: 8:37
Just love how the music becomes sinister as we move down the iceberg. Great stuff
The Observer Effect is just there to reduce lag
True
Your brain manipulates time to reduce lag already. Look it up.
I like how he narrates the videos himself but makes it sound mechanical. Really sells the smart robot schtick
he uses a text to speech generator
It's text to speech 💀
@@sawc.ma.bals. yea I might've been drunk when I wrote that.
@@stormanimations5422 you really sell what then. Come on. Say it. #ФЕДФЕД
The Observer Effect is an extremely convincing argument for us living in a program: The engine doesn't render the object until the players observe it.
No
And the bible was convincing because people didn't understand where we came from. Give it a few years will you. We didn't do this shit for more than 100 years and you're already clinging on to an unfalsifiable hypothesis.
Perhaps when the engine was built, the creators did not predict us getting to the stage of being able to observe things such as a single electron, so now they are frantically trying to make an update before we find exploits and bugs to do with it
That would take a massive amount of coding and energy to do, since you'd have to make every individual particle and code what it does, how it interacts, and making it vanish.
@@watchmychannelorelse My point has nothing to do with the code/amount of work required to do anything.
I'm only pointing out that it's an extremely common practice in programming to show/enable things in fragments depending on the context.
For example, when you're on the page of this video - your computer doesn't download every other video on youtube, it only downloads the one you're currently on.
I just love his explanation of the observer effect; it's like the universe is interacting with us, and choosing to say "fuck off!" while we try to uncover its secrets!
A specialist of "Science" and "Memes", best teacher anyone would love
Try Historyphile the DH too. Same style videos, with the AI voice, but about history.
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
id like to hear more about that electron one, thats one i legit never heard about and sounds like good vid meterial
ye im winning
That's Ydse , Youngs Double Slit Experiment
ua-cam.com/video/9dqtW9MslFk/v-deo.html this video is about exactly that
It's easily the coolest one on this list...
@@ArtamisBot not only the coolest, but also one of the most mind bending ones. In what way could just our observation literally change the behaviour of a particle. Its absolutely crazy and ever since ive heard of this experiment i cant see things the same anymore
incase you're wondering, here's a list of the EATEOT songs he used:
A1 - It's Just a Burning Memory
A4 - Childishly Fresh Eyes
D5 - The Way Ahead Feels Lonely
E2 - And Heart Breaks
E5 - To The Minimal Great Hidden
F7 - Libet's Delay
H1 - Post Awareness Confusions
L1 - Advanced Plague Entanglements
[unknown stage 6 track]
Perfect timing. Right as the video said “and now to the deep stuff” an ad played saying “how many subscriptions are you paying for”
I was expecting a normal ice Berg video but eateot started playing and hit me like a bus
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
Everywhere at the end of time, amazing
At this point, this has become a meme
@@marcusaasjensen yea
@@marcusaasjensen
Always has been
hmmmm....
I noticed that sound as well, something familiar... or is it? can't think straight
6:50 had me rolling🤣🤣
I love how the ominous music came along as soon as string theory came up
“I bet you have never- MEET YOUR PILLOW” ad placement is on point
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
I actually have a theory regarding quantum tunneling and dark energy: What's outside of our universe is no different than what we call a vacuum within. Like blowing a bubble, you can make the bubble as big as you want by adding more air, but the air is no different than the air outside of the bubble, there's just a confined space. Imagine that the universe is just a bubble in the void that has allowed particles to come within reach of each other to create objects like stars and such. Just like a bubble, adding more of what's outside to the inside will make the bubble bigger, and since our universe is expanding clearly something is being added. My theory is that "dark energy" is something that originates outside of our universe, and through quantum tunneling makes it's way into our universe without breaking the seal, and since the universe is big, there's a lot of dark energy that can seep in, and as the universe gets bigger, there will be more and more opportunities for dark energy to quantum tunnel in. This creates the exponential growth.
There really isn't an "outside" though.
@@aekaralagonisi If the universe is not infinite, there is an outside, since there is space beyond the edge
@@iammatthew4797 except if there isn't
@@jazzman7842 damn bro that's revolutionary
@@banter2143 ikr im such a genius
Your use of the dementia track is so subtle but so awesome. That s#1t is scary bro. Great content!
10:50 so that's why I survived six days without drinking water
“If a tree falls in the woods, but there is no one around to hear it, does it still make a sound?”
Schrodinger: “It makes a sound and no sound until observed”
This is actually a good solution to that question
@@helloworld9064 Interesting. Maybe this observe thing is used by the Gods to keep our simulation from lagging hahhhaha.
So by installing cameras and observing satellite we are making it lag makes sense
It does make a sound but we won't hear it
"If you're fallen in a forest and there's nobody around,
Do you ever really crush or even make a sound?"
😃
I got chills when I heard everywhere at the end of time
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
I love how the music changes the deeper down you go
Fun fact, one of the songs used in this video is called “A burning memory”, it originates from a 6 hour long album called “Everywhere at the End of Time” by The Caretaker (I think).
1:02 is where a part of the song plays (I think almost all songs in this are made by The Caretaker)
Hmm... less people have seen my videos.. even less know that I exist.. but not for very long.
You got my sub! I watched your videos, and they are a nice rio-off of sciencephile.. and I love them. Please create more soon
Yoo it’s his kid SCIENCEPHILE NOTICE HIM
@@parithyagaorg2472 Historyphile the DH got my sub too.
Sciencephile looks like a brain and Historyphile is a hand
@@creativename773
The eldest son
Actually the One-Electron thing may be an interesting interpretation to Heisenberg's uncertainty. What if not only position and momentum are superpositioned, but also time, or even maybe only time is the one that is uncertain?
Imagine a particle has time superposition, that would mean that it has diferent "states of time" at the same moment, and that when observed, the universe will chose a random moment in time to manifest. So, the Universe will chose an "A moment" in which the particle has momentum and positions values, or a "B moment" with different values and so on.
Its like having a bunch of photographies of different moments in time in your hand and picking up one with your eyes closed.
There actually is an uncertainty relation involving time, except time and energy are the conjugate variables instead of position and momentum. It basically means that quantum states that exist for only a short time can’t have a well defined energy.
It should be noted also that that’s not where superposition arises from in quantum mechanics. It has more to do with solutions to the Schrodinger equation, which guides the dynamics of qm
@@taymorrison I think it is important to note that the time-energy uncertainty is not analgous to other types of uncertainties, such as the Heisenberg uncertainty. Long story short, physical observables are mathematically represented by operators, eg. A & B. If A & B commutes, that is [A, B] = AB-BA = 0, then it is possible to find common eigenstates of the state (Not necessarily a wavefunction!). If, however, [A, B] doesn't equal zero, an uncertainty relation will arise. This is not physics, just pure math. The heisenberg uncertainty principle is given by the canonical commutation relation of [Q, P] = -ih/2pi, with Q being a position operator and P the momentum operator. Key note being, that both Q and P represents dynamical variables, i.e. measurebale characteristics of the system at any given time.
BUT - time is NOT a dynamical variable (At least not in a non-relatistic theory such as QM). You can't just go out and measure the "time" of a given particle, as you might Q and P. Time is the independent variable of which the dynamical observables are functions. The time associated in the Time-Energy uncertainty is a change in time (DeltaT). This DeltaT is the time it takes for the system to change substantially, or more precisely: The amount of time it takes the expectation value of an operator to change by one standard deviation. And this is entirely dependent on the observable you decide to... well observe. It could be Energy, but it might as well be position, momentum or any other physical observable. So - point being that the Energy-Time uncertainty does not tell us about some fundamental property of states (or particles, if you will), as the Heisenberg uncertainty does, but simply manifests as a consequence of time being the independent variable that all oberservables is a function of.
HEISENBERG FROM BREAKING BAD
damn didn't realize yall were actually smart while im over here thinking that eventually we'll just abuse virtual particles and zero-point energy like hell and be matter manipulating *literal gods*
@@doodlebro. same i got dizzy tryna read that
The only one I didn't know about was the One-Electron universe
8:58 my thoughts when I try to sleep
You're not the AI we deserve but the one we need
Some topics a few layers lower: Bose-Einstein condensates, Vacuum Energy and the Quantum Eraser.
BECs are relatively basic concepts in Quantum statistical mechanics, sonoluminscence on the otherhand...
don't einstein like hate quantum theory?
@ayy lmao vacuum energy is just energy of anything else
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
@@beaclaster Not hate. For his time, it was super hard to grasp mathematically...and to be fair, it still is.
4:28 this shit is so funny, its like the universe is playing a prank against scientists
6:59 ok, then why not communicate using frequency of these changes?
I love how they used The Caretaker - Everything at the End of Time for the Quantum Physics knowledge iceberg.
11:09 actually there will never be 0% chance of surviving. Even the death of the Universe because of entropy have a small chance of not happening with the quantum tunneling
_ohfucc_
oh fucc, that means i will never die
@@dioptre, and worst of all, “quantum immortality” doesn’t mean “quantum good health”. I mean, you could theoretically still live with brain damage and without your limbs in a scenario with nuclear war or something
@@user-wh5se3cb2y ohhhhhhhhh
man. ohhhhhhh god. ohhhhhh no i want to forget reading this.
Is it like this?
You have cancer. You are supposed to die in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
Dead.
You are dead. Your family members watched you die.
But, wait, your still alive?
Nobody watched you die? Due to the chances of you surviving are above 0, you are alive, but everyone watched you die, but also see you alive.
In another universe, you are dead. They watched you die. In this universe you are alive and Nobody watched you die. This continues for all eternity until your chances of survival are 0? Idk if I got the concept right but I think of it in this way
This channel is criminally underrated
That ad placement was *chef’s kiss*
*In this video the explanation of the observer effect is simple in comparison with others.I actually learned a great amount of hard topics(basic)in just a 11 minutes video.Thanks*
11:20 “I bet you have never heard of …”
Heard of what!?
Thanks blinkist for sponsoring the video
"Your consciousness can collapse reality once you become aware of it" Yes I too enjoy tryptamines
“Measurement” not consciousness
1:57 that gameplay was straight heat
I appreciate the deteriorating dementia music as you go deeper down the iceberg, it’s a nice touch.
i went backwards, the first thing i ever learned about quantum phisics by myself was the quantum suicide. now im slowly reaching the top
11:08 OH BOY!SCIENCE PROVING MY DELUISIONS RIGHT
I still shocked you dont have 1m subs yet. Your videos are amazing and nicely explained. I recommended your channel to my friends who love science.
Great now I'm going to have quantum dementia
_I don't remember anything in different universes_
*It's just a burning electron*
i remember taking my biology class and being like "wait wtf why is there quantum physics in my biology"
4:43 I already learned that in school but the way you explained it just made me laugh about the weirdness that we just accepted in school because our teacher told us to
IVE BEEN WAITING SO LONG
don't know why the many worlds interpretation is so far down, seems pretty well known to me, heck i think vsauce made a vid on it like 6 years ago
I think the ranking was more about weirdness than obscurity.
People talk about it but while even scientists don't understand it how can idiotic 1 brain cell I know everything guys understand think person think
@@imbored5879 *how can idiotic 1 brain cell goes "i know everything guys, i understand everything" Think person think. Is that what u mean?....
Yes, its annoying to hear that from them.
@@imbored5879 scientists know everything about the many worlds interpretation, they made it up themselves without any proof, it's not even a scientific theory. im not sure what you're talking about
explains everything much better than copenhagen in my opinion,i find copenhagen much more weird.
6:07 I’m 99% sure that’s a Jojo reference
that is 100% a Jojo reference
Gyro, Gyro, Gyro Zeppeli, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh
Genuinely been trying to understand Wave-Partical duality for 4 years and I finally get it. Thank you also wtaf
Is this what people mean by “if a tree falls down without anyone seeing it, will it make sound?”
sure it will, if someone is nearby... but we dont know if it would when no one is there to listen...
That saying basically talked quantum physic before quantum physic was a thing...
philosophically speaking, we can't know
quantum speaking, it would be in a superposition
@@MattJDylan Yes lol
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
I need the next part
I need it
we need it.
Love your videos by the way, been watching for a year or so now. Good Work
That was the smoothest transition into an ad that ive ever seen.
great stuff mate, i love the style and the info is as detailed as you can get int the time .....giant thumbs up and sub :D
I know of one thing deeper down the iceberg. Basically, every virtual particle that falls into a black hole can also be represented by a wave. Its wavelength is the width of its event horizon, and that means that the larger a black hole is, the less energy it loses since light with longer wavelengths has less energy. Since black holes lose their mass in discrete steps (whenever a virtual particle falls in), eventually they reach a mass where a particle with a wavelength of its event horizon would have to have more energy than the black hole itself. Therefore, the black hole stops losing mass and instead remains in existence, without interacting with any other matter in the universe other than with gravity. Kinda like dark matter, don't you think...?
also how does hawking radiation work? wouldnt the particle that falls in counteract the particle that didnt?
@@piethedye3948 check some more videos with more details they explain
PBS spacetime did a video a month ago that said what if dark matter is just black holes
@@piethedye3948 It's extremely important to understand that virtual particles are just that, virtual. They're mathematical artefacts, not actual existing things. Nothing really falls in to the black hole.
I realise it's necessary to simplify things to dummies like us, but I was hoping the video would have mentioned this small detail.
ua-cam.com/video/YxOhfipFk0Y/v-deo.html
Quantum mechanics lectures
Me: Casually watches UA-cam
Skynet: Right level two take it or leave it
Me: Knew all ones except one electron universe
I heard of the quantum suicide. I've honestly been scared of that being a possibility.
So in short the observer effect is like how theres no food in your fridge until your mum looks
Quantum Burgers do sound like a good career path to study 😂
As a child I remember asking dear old Pa about quantum mechanics once.
He said, "Son, quantum objects are like a woman. They get weird when you watch them and can be both particles (as all physical beings) and waves (when they're yelling at you)."
Pa was a little old fashioned.
Looool
Based Pa
Gotta say I still liked the old voice more. For some reason - despite it being more robotic - it carried more humor and for some reason it actually appeared less monotone, even though this voice is supposed to be less monotone and more human.
Also I think the old voice was more fitting as the channel is called Sciencephile the *_AI_* and the original voice was definitely more AI like and therefore (imo at least) more fitting for the channel name.
But that's just my 2 cents.
this. this right here.
UA-cam demonetized channels that use robotic voices so he had to adapt the voice to be more human. Unfortunate side effect because he puts in effort in his videos unlike the many channels that just robot read reddit threads for a quick buck.
He already explained why he had to stop using the old voice.
@@johnfranklin2288 Ah damn well if it's not possible it's not possible :/
I mean i still watch(ed) his videos cause they're well made :3
It's just that I liked the old voice more but yeah. Thanks UA-cam 😒
It represents his transition from a learning AI to an AI that has already studied human interactions and has manufactured a new "common" voice that makes us become more familiar with it. Skynet is evolving really fast.
I'm in a superposition of using Blinkist or not using Blinkist
But by shooting a sponsor at me,I collapsed into not using Blinkist, unfortunately
Particle being observed by a scientist
Giornio Giovana: "Kore ga.. Golden Experience.. Requiem da"
0:39 hey i have the same sweater as that kid.
10:20 cue pannenkoek
Hear me out Tj """"Henry"""" Yoshi
ah yes, quantum chicken nuggets
well ill have some quantum french fries and a crispy quantum chicken burger
I love when people rant at me about “wAvE pArTiClE dUaLiTy” somehow allowing themselves to do magic with “intentions” and “manifesting” because of some leap in logic that makes them think nature is conscious and somehow cares to change its properties for them. And they somehow think making this information as loudly announced as possible is the best way to go about things
“Hello mortals” is now my favorite sound
2:05 It always makes me laugh when people use Schrodinger's Cat to explain Quantum Superposition. Schrodinger himself was very against the idea of superposition and the point of his thought experiment was to prove how ridiculous the idea was (The cat being both dead and alive).
@ayy lmao Mission failed successfully
Why does it make you laugh? Schrödinger didn't like it because he didn't believe in it. But he was wrong and the cat paradox is spot on correct. Are you laughing because you wrongly thought the cat paradox was incorrect? If so, I'm laughing back at ya.
I loved when the circus song came on for Quantum healing
(Btw it's called "Entry of the Gladiators")