Black Hole Apocalypse FULL SPECIAL (2018) | NOVA | PBS America
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 гру 2024
- Join astrophysicist and novelist Janna Levin on a mind-blowing voyage to the frontiers of black hole science, which is shining new light on the most powerful and mysterious objects in the universe.
First Broadcast Date: January 10, 2018
About PBS America:
Welcome to PBS America, a British TV channel from America’s public service broadcaster, PBS, showcasing award-winning American history, science, current affairs, plus arts and culture shows alongside the works of living legend Ken Burns, output is all hand-picked by a British team.
Get More PBS America:
Website: www.pbsamerica...
Twitter: / pbsamerica
Facebook: / pbsamerica
Instagram: / pbsintheuk
Please, BRING US MORE, MORE, MORE of this !!!! We learn fast+are HUNGRY FOR MORE....
The Borg have spoken
This is not fluff. Janna is an enormous asset and contributor to science. She is a great communicator and makes very difficult science understandable to everyone. She is a treasure of humanity.
Bit tiresome and cringeworthy to listen after while though. 'Supermassives' 🙄
How many females can one cram into a documentary? Surprised they didn't put wigs on all the guys working on the JWST. Decent doc (albeit several years old, much of this info is dated) but contrived.
The thing I don't like is the dramatics... it's really not necessary "failure, could mark their lives... forever" ooOOoo. Like come on. Just give us facts and info without the crap around it.
@@cosdell2166 A black hole is densely compacted particles, how does that become another galaxy? It's all just science fictions.
@nuntana2 you don't like women?? There is plenty of men in this doc so what is your actual problem with it? You want more women and men in wigs?
@@Qaor yup this truly is a murican doc… they dont know how to make anything else unfortunaterly. Everything has to be entertainment.
I am speechless...what an enormous effort to produce a documentary of such splendor. How you can keep this degree of excellence going for such a long time, is utterly mind blowing. There are no words that can show my appreciation...thank you ALL.
Haha seriously!?!?
You're welcome.
م۔😢ک😢😢😢😢😢😢مملکثثثثثثثثث😢ججککل
ڈ ممکن کمنک۔ککککک۔۔۔للللل۔۔ل۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔لککککلکککک۔مکککککککلکککککککککلکککککککککککککمککممکککککمکککککمکککمککمکککککککمککک۔ممننن۔۔۔۔۔ل۔۔۔۔۔۔۔کک۔کلکللللل۔ل۔لللکککم کنمممممککککمکمکمککککمکککککککککککککککککمک۔ککککمککککن۔۔۔ہہ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔کم۔لکک۔نل۔ٓ۔لل۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ل۔ک۔۔ل۔۔ک۔۔۔لککک۔کل۔کککلککک کک کککک کک۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔سکککککک کک ککککککککککککککککککککککککککککککککککککمکککک ک کک کککککلک۔ل
ک ک ک ک ک ک کک ک۔ ک ککک ک۔ ک۔ کک ک ک کک کککک کککککک کککککککک کککک ک کک کککک کککککک کککک۔ کککمککک کک۔ ڈکک
🫡🫡🫡🫡🤨🤨🫡🤨>....
It's the same formula used over & over with the same old CGI. What are you talking about.
I can't get enough of this kind of wisdom. Called science. You know that strange thing creating, cars, cell phones and moon rockets.
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
thats not proper science. todays science degenerated into tech inventions
You do realise the every single thing mentioned in this about black holes is all speculation & theary. Nobody has ever seen or or actually knows what is going on with black holes.
And science fiction.
one of the best documentary. I like the scene when she says "Forget about it" while going into the blackhole
I was struck by the water vortex going down the plug hole of that bathtub. If gravity pulls nebulae in 3D to condense matter under its own mass, yet matter has an ecliptic plane spin axis (force in 2D) what process is this energy displacement translated, mutable by? I'm seeing planarity bifurcation here.
Why people are having an itch in their minds complaining about a subject matter which is already complicated to explain yet this documentary chose a presentation, which is easy on the eyes and pleasing to engage my mind to enjoy it along the way. I admire PBS they have a unique way of presenting documentaries and on UA-cam at least allowing free access for anyone to enjoy. So with all due respect why complaining and comparing!! A fan and an admirer from Pakistan.
They're known as wankers ,
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
I've been watching Nova since the 90's and it is A-1 science content.
I agree with you bro .
@@hollaadieewaldfeee What ever are you babbling on about? Suggest start at the very basics--read some standard astrophysics and math theory and also get your prose in order. You are ranting about tripe.
This doc is quite nicely done, but is a bit heavy on the feminist angle.
The graphical explanation in this overview is superb !!! ... and very captivating. THANKS
An outstanding documentary. Superb quality. Many questions asked. Many answered scientifically or mathematically. This is the BEST EVIDENCE of Power of God. How everything obits left to right. How everything stays in its place.
God? Which one do you believe in?
Best documentar about the universe. So well explained. - Superb.
I show this to my grade 9 science students every year! Great video.
A really fascinating, understanding Master Pice ! Thank you all and Greetings from rainin' Germany
From their formation to their gravitational influence on surrounding matter, blackholes are indeed cosmic wonders.
Amazing documentary! Thank you PBS for making such a video. This totally helped me ease my mind from the constant bullshit that we are thrown at by content creators these days.
Janna! Aren't you lovely and the documentary is brilliant also. You blew my mind with a subject made simple.
Loved it! Thanks a lot. Such great explanations from the ones involved in developing what they are explaining is very enriching.
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
what happen with all that stuff lands inside
In eternity of eternities the earth Will be swallowed by a black hoole.
@@gregk3246 Crushed down to almost nothingness
Just a single context for everything and it could be monumental for a meaning.
the video was excellent, see the information on these amazing wonder makes you get goosebump.
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
@@hollaadieewaldfeee
Hey who ever u r u don’t need to give 2 page paragraph on the statement I documented. Yes I understand this is all theory.
U need understand that some people just enjoy the video.
If ur a physicist or a scientist or a professor tone it down. If u accomplish ur field of education help people don’t bully.
great presentation here. So informative. Thank you for keeping my interest so strong. Grateful to PBS
Hahahahahhaa
@@yaasinmAre you ok ? Want me to call someone for you ?
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
NICE work. Also love you for being the namesake of my lifemate for 50 years,
What PBS America ? 😂
I’ve been enjoying this documentary the last few nights. Incredibly enjoyable and informative! Janna Levin is a fantastic host! Great job PBS!
same, watching this for days for nap :D
It’s trash
@@chrisstevens-xq2vb Is your name Jack Hoff ?
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
I love falling asleep to this one, but my favourite is "Everything you need to know about black holes:"
ua-cam.com/video/0mGxjd_ZM2s/v-deo.html&pp=ygUtZXZlcnl0aGluZyB5b3UgbmVlZCB0byBrbm93IGFib3V0IGJsYWNrIGhvbGVz
enjoy
Why is the background music soooo loud?
Brilliant documentary. Absolutely stunning. Thank you!
Yes, but if science really wants a breakthrough, tell us what is not possible.
Damn! The universe is terrifyingly beautiful.
Wow ... after couple of years I got this :-) I love this.
How do they make the graphics for shows like this?
The whole problem with Newtonian physics and all that Einstein business is that everyone know that our planet is flat!
Of course I'm joking, its a great show you guys made. It is complicated stuff, very well explained.
Well done!
I swear I wish I had these docos when I was young back in the 80’s. I would haves been glued to the crt screen. And with what I learned I could have been a space scientist’s assistants’s coffee boy/runner…. Instead of a bum barrista working at Starbucks…..
I could have been contender 😂😂😂
Well at least your company has star in its name so you kinda reached the stars 👍
@@garyk1334 O yeah.... I didn't see that one. So you see how dumb I became now.. I could've been a contender and as a Bar tender as well.
@@LOKEY-NL you huff n bluff n pretend I’m smart when I’m actually not??
Nah unfortunately I’ll always be limited to be a Bar tender… 🤣🤣
Nothing wrong with that cause I get to meet and see and go out a lot of chicks which these nuclear scientists wouldn’t!! 😎😎
@@LOKEY-NL thanks 😊, same to you n ur family.
Btw girls really dig smart intelligent n witty guys much more than rich guys.
I’m average looks but can fish many fish 🎣!!
@@Alan-meganHi Yogi,
Don't sell yourself short! I have had 2 careers 1. A Registered Nurse for 20 years. 2. A Coast Guard Officer for 24 years. Get your ass back to school and choose something out of your comfort zone for me it's Nuclear Physics!!! I still have dyslexic issues with mathematics so I am unable to do the calculations but I do understand the concepts…. Take a risk what do have to lose? Except maybe a new career…
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
John S Ehrhart RN,
EOD/HAZMAT SPECIALIST
U.S. Coast Guard Retired
What is the stuff the jets coming out of a black I hole
Such an engaging and informative video perfectly balanced!
How would a death of a human be if swallowed by a black hole? Painful? Too fast to feel anything? Would it be like the implosion when under the ocean at a very deep distance from the top?
Which fuel does your spaceship use?
Please forgive my ignorance, but, if a star is circling a black hole every 6 days, why doesn’t the black hole swallows it already? How long does it take?
If a star (or anything else) is in a stable orbit around a black hole it can remain that way indefinitely. It's no different from, say, the moon orbiting the Earth. The detectable gravitational waves discussed in the documentary arise when black holes or neutron stars are in declining orbits around each other and their angular velocity reaches ludicrous speeds as they approach directly prior to collision. Or, in other words, you have two very, VERY heavy objects moving very, VERY fast.
Good stuff. Always a fan of NOVA and this type of stuff is why. :)
The Republican Party and PBS!
And for the Republicans, PBS is an expense, a cost.
As a result, the Budget allocated to PBS is usually reduced.
Fantastic production and presantation.
Thank you PBS.
very good presentation 🙂😎😎 looking forward to more
I've got a question for all, what came first energy or matter?
Hope I get an answer for this.. 14:54 does that mean earth is gonna fall for the curve of sun fabric space time liens some how !!!
I literally grew up on PBS and now i can't wait to show this to my future kids 🥰🥰🥰 if it entertains me i can only imagine a kid 😎
What about my kids?? :)
The real deal: ua-cam.com/video/mINsiT70OHE/v-deo.htmlsi=JW-A1-cTS6gsJyms
Love the way they present it... i just love it.. and really we all are not black holes experts here... true to God i felt it when the gravitational wave hit the LIGO.. xx❤️
Thanks for posting.
How does a gravitational wave travel at the speed of light. Isnt that impossible?
@allendunn1596: The sped of light only applies to something that has mass. Light is massless (photons) and so are gravity waves so they are not affected by the "speed limit".
No. Light in a vacuum travels at what is effectively the 'maximum speed limit' for the observable universe. That is only possible for things with no mass, which include both light and gravitational waves.
41:02 I love that necklace! Awesome. ❤👍
how old is this video? 10 years, more?
Can't be 10 years as ligo experiment shown was 2015
First aired in 2018
I don't care. This is good stuff.
Knowledge is a wonderful thing. While it's not our ultimate, it's what we have, to the best of our gained understanding. Yes it may change, it will change, but these are wonderful times. Just enjoy. " No beginning, no end" to me it sounds like eternity, which I'm a great fan of. Rightly or wrongly.
Videos like this and programs like Nova are why it’s critical that PBS remains active and properly funded to ensure education and wonder are attainable for all ❤
I finally got what the “black hole” actually is and what is lurking in it’s center - the tax payers money - an enormous hard labor and expectations for improved quality of life eventually is “spaghettified” into a “intellectual satisfaction of solving a “problem”” 45:22. We passed the event horizon … there is no way back …
Video is nice. Finally we saw a black hole and supermassive black hole and its a true find
I don’t think people in here realize what a great topic this is
I'm not a scientist, so I'm a bit lost. Are the enormous gas clouds entering or exiting the massive black holes?
Collapsing to form and then entering - ‘being eaten’.
Very enjoyable. Thank You.
What happened to the original host of Nova?
Great presentation, easy to digest.
PBS is very informative.
The way they carry the show is amazing.
Excellent Content.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
i learned nothing i already knew lol. all that was said is that they dont know what it is and its gravity. wow
@@sllll7457 Is your name Jack Hoff ?
I have a question; if one fell into a black hole and somehow survived, would you ever actually reach the singularity? Doesn't the gravitational well become deeper as the black hole gains mass?
Yes. Black holes are not all that mysterious really. The mythical part of their existence stems from a quirk, or perhaps failure, of our mathematical description of them. You understand what a Neutron star is, right ? one teaspoon of matter from a Neutron star is many many of tons of mass, and naturally they have insane gravitational fields. All a black hole is, is a concentration of mass large enough that it bends space time to prevent anything from leaving it. It doesn't "crush" things out of existence, they simply get stripped down and added to the overall mass, thus they increase in volume slowly after absorbing millions of solar masses. Saying that their gravity is infinite is wrong, it is a failure of our math, a more appropriate description would be to say they are at "absolute maximum" gravitational force, and that all they can do is grow in size as they absorb more mass. But make no mistake, all that mass is still in there.
We may one day come across Neutron stars or similar entities that are just below the transition phase whereby they stop being able to emit radiation directly from the mass itself, we may get to witness the actual transition from being able to radiate energy to mass being just high enough that they change into the non radiative black state, we could learn a lot from witnessing such a transition.
You assume that something like a Singularity (Infinite Density) actually is "a thing" that could be "encountered" or "reached". Black Hole has a finite Mass, why would it be "gaining" mass? Theoretically the Singularity at its centre has infinite Density, but anything "infinite" in relation to real world objects is theoretical, worse, - hypothetical LOL. Or did you mean it's "gaining mass" as in gaining YOUR mass? Hypothetically, - all that you were, - the information about you would exist in a 2-Dimensional format (particularly if you happen to be Timmer, Susskind or Hooft) encoded on the "surface" of the Black Hole (which is Event Horizon). I'm not entirely sure if this "conversion" is survivable though. But perhaps there is a way it could be gathered again in order to re-create you in 3-D. For instance if you took the Semiclassical Gravity approach, there may yet be hope 😝 physics.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/PhysicsAtMIT_2023_Engelhardt_Feature.pdf#:~:text=The%20black%20hole%20information%20paradox%20is%20a%20conflict%20between%20two,are%20in%20principle%2C%20though%20not
Hi Mike, The quick answer is not for a very long time. As you get nearer to the core or singularity so the gravity will get greater and as the gravity gets greater so the time will get slower due to time dilation. You may well still be on your journey to the core for Billions of years.
Interesting aside, because of time distortion, you would see the end of the universe.
Time dilation is always only relative to others. Time will always seem normal to you, since your perception"speed" also changes with the time dilation. It might take you 10 billion years to reach the event horizon, but to you it might only seem like seconds.
About the singularity:
It is not really a "place" you can visit. The singularity is basically the "future" of anything that passes the event horizon. So once you pass it, you no longer move through space, you move through time. That is also the reason why you cannot escape a black hole. You would need to move backwards through time, not space.
That aside, except for very very large black holes, you would probably be dead before crossing the event horizon. The tidal forces are extreme. Gravity can change in order of magnitudes over a few centmeters. Also the temperature is an issue. Accretion disks reach temperatures of a few hundred million kelvin.
I just had an epifany about why galaxies are "flat". It made no sense to me in a 3D world why most orbits and galaxies are mostly planar. The thought of it would point to a more spheric model, but at the speeds things are turning it makes sense that you end up with matter compressing towards the equator of a sphere. Mind blown.
Flot video.
Det føles som om, at Kosmos er en stor levende organisme, præcis som vi mennesker.
so cool - thanks for educating me!
So x rays are faster in time by a constante of light time. Wich means we can measure life in light with x Ray response beams or optical hyper beam. A beam made of time and gold and Silver.
So IA is with Silver and gold. That means it has a life of about twice the light normal wich is in humans 4b times or from 3 times to millions.
Can light travel without gravity?
ok were is now and which way is it moving?????
Gravity is not a force it is a description of moving space toward matter. Gravity is the manipulation of space as it accelerates towards matter. Acceleration and gravity are identical as far as force is concerned. It's obvious that space is accelerating toward mass at a continuous rate. The matter that exists within this stream of space is pulled in the streams direction. The consumption of space is what allows matter to exist.
WOW i understand the situation clearly!! Its so amazing that the waves reach's us!!!😮 SUPER MIND BLOWING
😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮 *speechless .. il deffo be looking up abit more often. WOW 🎉😮 deffo must watch 😮
I watched whole documentary and blew my mind,imagine next generation when they come to enter the black hole 😮
I love Science and Scientists ❤
As you should 🧬❤ 28:28
Absolutely amazing!!!
Now I realize that this movie was produced before the James Webb Space Telescope was launched. How much further have we progressed since then? There is already significant doubt surrounding the Big Bang theory and the estimated age of the universe.
The idea of a black hole at the center of each galaxy doesn’t seem strange to me. Our solar system has the sun at its center, around which the planets revolve. Could black holes play a similar role, acting as gravitational anchors that keep galaxies structured and stable? Just a thought.
And that also becomes a description of everything when it could be written in a single sentence.
You almost want to TRAVEL UP THERE...much more interesting than here on earth !!
"A good comparison I heard from my science teacher way back when was that; somewhere out there is a grain of sand that has your name on it... go find it.
Really put things in perspective…"
Great documentary thank you
Why so short
Wonderful documentary! From the great mind that envisioned them, makes it a outstanding master piece of knowledge. Wish you can update it with the images of the black hole initiative! Thanks so much from Mexico!
Meh it’s pseudoscience big time
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
1:27:30 every galaxy have supermassive black hole in its centre even without black hole galaxy cannot form.Black holes play the role gravity in galaxy which makes galaxy structure and stars are bound together because of black hole
Edit: Like our sun for our solar system
I believe that someday we would unravel the mysteries of the Blackhole
FIrst time i love to watch science channel
Weirdo
I seemed to be able to keep up with this one much better. It was great. I usually get lost (In space, as it were).
So what would have happened if this wave hit let's say a week or two before this detector went online, would we never know it existed as it had passed two weeks earlier??
Fantastic upload. Clear and articulate narration. Wonderful visuals. What an absolute treat.
Cheers PBS. Hope you all have a lovely Christmas.🤶 🤶
ua-cam.com/video/mINsiT70OHE/v-deo.htmlsi=ZQ1U8uHutibe0L0E
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
😀sú to moje srdcovky nadšená som ich tajomstvom milujem PLUTO❤
If gravity is not interaction between objects, how it travels in space-time? It sounds like space-time is a medium with which objects interact instead with each other. It's a vicious circle. The explanation of the phenomena rises equally unexplained question.
I got experience surrounding items like cars, ball, table, spoon raise up by themself without gravity for about 10sec and later dropped to the ground
I have Rush Faewell to kings Cignus x-1 playing in the background while looking at this documentory, mgestic.
it is an old Video, but my question is always if i see movies of Black Holes... Gravity pulls from every side? isnt it? why is this curve of spacetime just in one direction? dont Should this happen in every direction? But we have a Point in every Star/Planet/BH... I understand that Poles and Magnetic Fields forming this Discs of Matter, Build this rings of Matter, Fire and all is spinning around because of the Spin, the Object have. But Gravitywaves are running tru Cosmos like the waves on Water after a stone splash in to. Why they didnt spread out in EVERY Direction? And is this just a Lucky Hit or is it unavoidable that we "feel" this Gravitywaves (with LIGO) and why they didnt slow down? At least if they hit an Object? Btw, i am German, try to follow english conversation - but i am sure i didnt catch all. With love and sending Hugs tru the Universe....!
So if you start wearing size 10 boots instead of the normal size 9. You know you have been spagettified..
"What black hole? Oh that one, ouch.. 😅
Great presentation Miss Levin!
PBS..👍
I have a real stupid question. Does black holes eject dark matter as it sucks every thing up?
Black Hole is a stupid idea.
Black holls, message video 📷📸, very nice 👍🙂 from France kannan.
Brilliantly presented. Thank you
Even the birth of a supermassive blackhole began with two small particles being like, "hey, let's live together." There's something poetic about that. 😊
what will happen if you are in the black hole?
It's a star.
I'm amazed by how they calculate the distance to the black hole, that was my greatest wonder.
Einstein claims a relative observation and interpretation! Reduces this claim practically to just one of the observations, phenomenons, effects: velocity („relative velocity“; and acceleration), and neglects that all other observations, phenomenons, effects, are relative to each other as well. This fails (or succeeds;-) by reducing the at least two (relative) observations by reducing the observers to only one! Without taking into account its already made mutual observations! A catastrophic methodological mistake!
From here, from his beginning of the formation of "relativity-theses", from the first step, every following thesis and equation is unscientific and nonsensical!
Again: A catastrophic methodological mistake! NO science! NO scientific "Relativity Theories"! NONsens!
> 100 years of relativity nonsens and millions over millions of "physicists" and "mathematicians" who have not become aware of this crap and will not, who BELIEVE in BigBangs, wormholes, dark matters and so on;-)
... A little methodological criticism and criticism of the development, history of "theory"-)
Everything happening in universe is needed for planet earth
Really a stomach full of material...
I munched each minute of the video...very informative and interesting...❤keep it up
Show us more REAL madness, chaos that happens in other galaxies...please ...Thanxxx PBS !!! G r e a t
so interstellar weather? the evolution of the expansion and contraption of spacetime within and between galaxies.
So basically, since everything in the universe can be simplified to space and time, a black hole is a place where space is compressed more than the outside. That is what causes the difference.
what will happen if we where near in a black hole?
It's a star.
@23:08
"The term 'Black Hole' actually originates in India, it was the name of an infamous prison in Calcutta"
That's got to be one of the most asinine attributions ever made. I reckon she was trolling.
A prison may well have already had such a moniker (although I wouldn't be surprised if that's not corroborated), but that doesn't mean it inspired any future instances.
That also just so happens to be the name I've been using for Tyrone's receptacle for so long he'd slap me for giving away our ages if I dared say. But my point is I didn't get that name from some Indian Prison, nor was it inspired by an infinitely dense physical anomaly. I created that name myself, before I ever heard of either, because of...... entirely different reasons is all you need to know!
You got a racism issue.
Can we hitch a ride on gravitational waves?
Very interesting documentary, indeed !! 🤓