WLVRN Sand and Mud Test, what happened!?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 58

  • @ChrisPBakin
    @ChrisPBakin 7 місяців тому +11

    Glad to see DT is as excited about the WLVRN as the fanbase is! Looks awesome, I agree with the guy that said getting this rifle out to Garand Thumb and InrangeTV. More WLVRN content is always a plus

  • @humanbass
    @humanbass 7 місяців тому +22

    That is actually impressive, didnt spare the ejection port.

  • @richiev74100
    @richiev74100 7 місяців тому +17

    That's insane. I want an FDE 308 WLVRN

  • @corps101
    @corps101 7 місяців тому +6

    That was a Really impressive demo; but I’d agree with the other commenters. We need some 3rd party testers doing similar torture tests.
    Still though, this video is more than enough for me to want to buy a wlvrn.
    Two things you guys still need to figure out is a) handguard lockup and b) 300 blk in the micron kit . Those two things would elevate the system considerably

  • @xrpbelieverxrpbeliever5093
    @xrpbelieverxrpbeliever5093 7 місяців тому +7

    I'm impressed.

  • @stepancermak8914
    @stepancermak8914 7 місяців тому +5

    That is something, did not expect its gonna work after that mud completly covers it....not sure if any other gun would work like this

  • @jts0221
    @jts0221 7 місяців тому +5

    Man I want one of these..... big project at work right now and when its done I am due for a bonus; which is a funny way to spell WLVRN

  • @xenomorphelv4265
    @xenomorphelv4265 6 місяців тому +2

    Seeing how easy debris and dust can enter from the brass ejection port and prevent the BCG to correctly be into battery, I think a classic dust cover would improve a lot the sealing factor on the wolverine. I don't know why they didn't add one.

  • @Stryker2279
    @Stryker2279 7 місяців тому +36

    This is a nice video, but I think you'll get a lot more reach if inrangeTV did it as well. Send them a wlvrn to play with 🥺🥺🥺

    • @IscariottActual
      @IscariottActual 7 місяців тому +3

      I cannot understand this company's marketing plan. They do their own reviews lol

    • @elterga6224
      @elterga6224 7 місяців тому +6

      @@IscariottActualit’s not a review, it’s advertising

    • @DesertTechUT
      @DesertTechUT  7 місяців тому +8

      Thanks for the tip

    • @methodsocratic
      @methodsocratic 7 місяців тому +4

      @@DesertTechUTdunno if it’s in the works or not, but would love to see inRange, Forgotten Weapons & Papa Thumb dirty up & shoot & review the WLVRN, considering how impactful their reviews were on the MDR/MDRX.

    • @davidchappelle3212
      @davidchappelle3212 7 місяців тому +2

      @@DesertTechUTagreed inrangetv is how I originally heard about the mdr

  • @ericbergfield6451
    @ericbergfield6451 2 місяці тому

    Good test, I ordered a WLVRN & am looking forward to using it exclusively with the micron conversion kit

    • @nafnaf0
      @nafnaf0 18 днів тому +1

      If you get one, please do a review on it

    • @ericbergfield6451
      @ericbergfield6451 18 днів тому

      @nafnaf0 I got my WLVRN Micron last month, & I freaking love it. Using it with PTR's 5.56 Ti suppressor, & it makes me question why I own any PCC's 😍

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 7 місяців тому +6

    Awesome 😎

  • @spartan7042
    @spartan7042 6 місяців тому +1

    Very impressive, I'd like to see more testing on this.

  • @Captain_Mace
    @Captain_Mace 7 місяців тому +2

    This is very impressive! I do have a question though, I have an MDRX and I'd love to get a WLVRN but do I have to buy the firearm all over again, or is there an "upgrade" package I can purchase?

    • @DesertTechUT
      @DesertTechUT  7 місяців тому +2

      This is a new rifle with all new reengineered internals.

    • @iaia5368
      @iaia5368 5 місяців тому

      ​@@DesertTechUT Obviously because this gun is garbage, a scam. Terrible durability problems and extremely low reliability. Do you need competent engineers to design a gun? Just stop saving and pay me 10 thousand dollars a month and I'll do the job, noobs. Even an AR-15 with a bullPup kit does better than these weapons from this psychopath from DT.

  • @ALegitimateYoutuber
    @ALegitimateYoutuber 7 місяців тому +7

    but was that mud certified by inrange for genuine mud testing

    • @elterga6224
      @elterga6224 7 місяців тому +1

      Utah mud is pretty sticky and thick, I guarantee it’s a good indicator if a gun can power through it.

    • @RogueSanta
      @RogueSanta 7 місяців тому

      "Is that mud bonafide?"

  • @outis7080
    @outis7080 7 місяців тому +5

    Will the WLVRN Micron be able to take 300 Blackout unlike the MDR?

    • @GiveMeYoSammich
      @GiveMeYoSammich 7 місяців тому +2

      They're still working on adapting the 300 blk round to the wlvryn system. But they did confirm it's coming in a year or so if everything goes to plan

    • @outis7080
      @outis7080 7 місяців тому +3

      @@GiveMeYoSammich But will it come in the Micron form of the WLVRN? There wasn't a 300 Blackout MDRX Micron due to the gas block being too far forward, dwell time issues I presume. I wonder if Desert Tech has managed to deal with this issue. A 300 Blackout Micron would make an amazing suppressor host. With the right can, it could be as short as a collapsed MP5SD but with far superior terminal effects.

    • @GiveMeYoSammich
      @GiveMeYoSammich 7 місяців тому +3

      @@outis7080 I hear you there, just from asethics, the gas block looks the same but I hope they're able to get 300 on this platform.

    • @nlmaster9811
      @nlmaster9811 7 місяців тому +4

      @@outis7080 It caused there to not be enough pressure to cycle the firearm. one of the things they mentioned in the WLVRN updates was the it takes significantly less pressure to cycle, so fingers crossed.

  • @dvazquez5652
    @dvazquez5652 7 місяців тому +3

    Do a Quattro mag compatible WVLRN

    • @adriangriffith42
      @adriangriffith42 7 місяців тому +1

      That would most likely need to re-engineered and, I believe dedicated 5.56. I love the idea of a bullpup that takes the quattro 15, but it'd a different model altogether.

  • @raphaelhanna8345
    @raphaelhanna8345 2 дні тому

    Out of curiosity how much does the Micron variant of the WLVRN weigh?

  • @LBRS2nd
    @LBRS2nd 7 місяців тому +2

    Are you planning any 6Arc magic in the near future?

    • @ChazHaze-mx2dx
      @ChazHaze-mx2dx 7 місяців тому +3

      Es tactical will probably be making barrels if they dont already. Check them out!

  • @WarpathActual
    @WarpathActual 7 місяців тому +3

    Is a .277 conversion in the works?

    • @Odinforever2000
      @Odinforever2000 7 місяців тому +1

      Why? Genuinely curious

    • @blaeshoflen8663
      @blaeshoflen8663 7 місяців тому +3

      Standard “low pressure” 277 cant even keep up with 7mm-08 and is only marginally better that 308 depending on what you’re doing. So I also ask, why? Biggest cartridge I could see them coming out with next is 8.6 or one of the ARCs.

    • @WarpathActual
      @WarpathActual 7 місяців тому +4

      @@blaeshoflen8663With only 1 Mil of drop at 700 yards out of a 13.5” barrel, even “low pressure” training rounds out of .277 vastly outperforms.308.
      The benefits of running a short action that performs like that, out of such a short barrel should be obvious for a bullpup.

    • @Chemo735
      @Chemo735 7 місяців тому +1

      @@blaeshoflen8663Because of non-standard, full power .277 Sig, maybe?

    • @nlmaster9811
      @nlmaster9811 7 місяців тому

      @@Odinforever2000the military is switching to it, within the next decade or so it’ll start becoming the standard.

  • @timothy705
    @timothy705 7 місяців тому +1

    I wonder if the gun would’ve avoided either of those stove pipes on the adverse gas setting. Very impressive nonetheless. A good AR might have a slight advantage due to a dust cover that opens outward and gas blowing out of the bolt carrier but this is as good as in’ve ever seen on a piston gun.
    In real life if you drop your gun in the mud you’d have to be in an incredibly FUBAR situation to not take a moment to dig it out of the ejection port with your finger before firing.

  • @MatthewC176
    @MatthewC176 7 місяців тому +2

    Why are y’all allergic to gen 3 pmags?

    • @xenomorphelv4265
      @xenomorphelv4265 6 місяців тому

      gen 3 pmag is only usefull for hk416D and older variants that had non standard magwel geometry..

    • @MatthewC176
      @MatthewC176 6 місяців тому

      @@xenomorphelv4265 they’re also far superior in every way to gen 2 pmags
      Stronger, more reliable, better materials, enhanced features, etc etc

  • @unrar1
    @unrar1 7 місяців тому

    That camera man wanted the gun to fail so hard 😂

  • @invaderjoshua6280
    @invaderjoshua6280 27 днів тому +1

    It failed the mud test. You had to manually remove mud before you could get it to function. Every AR AK and SCAR/APC Bullpup mud test I've seen they never manually remove mud beforehand and call it a win.

    • @DesertTechUT
      @DesertTechUT  27 днів тому

      LOL, you will need to watch in-range mud tests more often, every AK fails miserably. In addition every mud test you have seen didn't have a sand test conducted multiple times prior to the mud test. The WLVRN had absolute phenomenal performance!

  • @JimYeats
    @JimYeats 6 місяців тому +1

    Your naming scheme is about as good as HUXWRX suppressors. Long live the Wolvern.

  • @simpleman6542
    @simpleman6542 17 днів тому

    Cool…

  • @ugatobekittenme
    @ugatobekittenme 7 місяців тому +1

    You spelled Triple wrong (and spelled Wolverine wrong) ☝️🤓

  • @simmack17
    @simmack17 3 місяці тому

    Beautiful