Very informative. I have read Tony Joseph's articles in 'The Hindu'. Genetic studies throw a lot of light on history. I would like to hear about how Buddhism was driven away from India. Was Shankaracharya casteist? Can someone enlighten me on these?
Remember corona times and then relate it to untouchability, then you will not see anything wrong with that, in 2020 we are not able to handle the pandemic, then think about what would be the situation at these times, so untouchability came from these Mahamaris and not from varna or caste, dont confuse people of India.
ask the presenter(communist) couple of questions from the discussion after the interview :D :D he looked extremely interested in the concepts right?? lol KERALA needs to celebrate their history beyond "Thomas the Apostle" arrival in KERALA. As for Devdutt he assumes a lot of things as well based on textual evidence he finds about history at the same time acknowledging the biased writers or translators of those times. Funny he also mentions ORAL traditions of ancient India through the lineages and draws his conclusions only from the written texts he finds. There is no authority who can confirm in this age and time what was history before the archeological records even if you don't consider the biased writers/translators of those texts.
Devdutt is spinning a fine yarn. Srilanka as ravana kingdom is already spoken about much earlier than chola kings and Kamba Ramayana. Kula sekara azhwar sings தென்இலங்கை கோன் முடிகள் சிந்துவித்தாய் செம்பொன்சேர்”. He is much before Kamban. Appar the saiva saint who lived in 7 century AD during Pallava time identified ravana with srilanka clearly - surely pallavas did not invade lanka - sixth thirumurai, 39 pathikam and song 10. ஒருசுடராய் உலகேழு மானான் கண்டாய் ஓங்காரத் துட்பொருளாய் நின்றான் கண்டாய் விரிசுடராய் விளங்கொளியாய் நின்றான் கண்டாய் விழவொலியும் வேள்வொலியு மானான் கண்டாய் இருசுடர்மீ தோடா இலங்கைக் கோனை யீடழிய இருபதுதோ ளிறுத்தான் கண்டாய் மருசுடரின் மாணிக்கக் குன்று கண்டாய் மழபாடி மன்னு மணாளன் றானே Devdutt needs to deepen his knowledge instead of imposing western theories of a non unified india and that south identified lanka with ravana only by 10 century . He is unfortunately a half baked and fraud scholar even if his conceptual leaps are very interesting sometimes
Such a marvelous discussion! As always, thank you The Hindu and Mr Pattanaik. May this country be one of wisdom again.
Wonderful conversation, very much worthy knowledge
So insightful!!😮
❤Thank you! Meaningful and memorable. Grateful that it's preserved on UA-cam with CC and TRANSCRIPT.
Wonderful discussion and hope many listen to this with an open mind to learn newer perspectives
Always a pleasure listening to Devdutt! Thank you for the video:)
Excellent information
Woahh!! Such an eye-opener conversation
यह विद्वान अकेले भगवा चरमपंथियों को अपनी नानी याद दिला देता हैं।
देवदत्त जी, में आप को प्रणाम करता हूं। 🙏
I agree.
Very informative.
I have read Tony Joseph's articles in 'The Hindu'. Genetic studies throw a lot of light on history.
I would like to hear about how Buddhism was driven away from India.
Was Shankaracharya casteist? Can someone enlighten me on these?
My myth about Devdutt has been busted today. Mythology can make as much sense if we try to understand it with an open mind and scientifically.
What is the myth about him ?
@@AjitJoshi686 that he understands what he is taling about ;)
Gau mutra drinker spotted
I am eternally grateful for british and especially macaulay for empowering me with English education and scientific knowledge.
Remember corona times and then relate it to untouchability, then you will not see anything wrong with that, in 2020 we are not able to handle the pandemic, then think about what would be the situation at these times, so untouchability came from these Mahamaris and not from varna or caste, dont confuse people of India.
If Ramayana was only in North, then what is Ramasethu
Nice interview
❤❤❤
ask the presenter(communist) couple of questions from the discussion after the interview :D :D he looked extremely interested in the concepts right?? lol KERALA needs to celebrate their history beyond "Thomas the Apostle" arrival in KERALA. As for Devdutt he assumes a lot of things as well based on textual evidence he finds about history at the same time acknowledging the biased writers or translators of those times. Funny he also mentions ORAL traditions of ancient India through the lineages and draws his conclusions only from the written texts he finds. There is no authority who can confirm in this age and time what was history before the archeological records even if you don't consider the biased writers/translators of those texts.
Me after 2 fat joint 😂
मूर्ख को वेद भी विष होता हैं। मैं भगवान से तेरे अकाल की विकास के लिए प्रार्थना करता हूं।
@@yj9032 Macaulay ke dalay!
Patnaik should have Z+ security.
Thanks god im not a Hindhu
Can you explain??
I suppose you must be a pedoworshiper😅
Thank god you are even bad with spelling and grammar.
Same brother. Dodged a bullet even before I was born.
@@metalfootsoldier699 do you know why and how your ancestors converted??
Devdutt is spinning a fine yarn. Srilanka as ravana kingdom is already spoken about much earlier than chola kings and Kamba Ramayana. Kula sekara azhwar sings தென்இலங்கை கோன் முடிகள் சிந்துவித்தாய் செம்பொன்சேர்”. He is much before Kamban. Appar the saiva saint who lived in 7 century AD during Pallava time identified ravana with srilanka clearly - surely pallavas did not invade lanka - sixth thirumurai, 39 pathikam and song 10. ஒருசுடராய் உலகேழு மானான் கண்டாய்
ஓங்காரத் துட்பொருளாய் நின்றான் கண்டாய்
விரிசுடராய் விளங்கொளியாய் நின்றான் கண்டாய்
விழவொலியும் வேள்வொலியு மானான் கண்டாய்
இருசுடர்மீ தோடா இலங்கைக் கோனை
யீடழிய இருபதுதோ ளிறுத்தான் கண்டாய்
மருசுடரின் மாணிக்கக் குன்று கண்டாய்
மழபாடி மன்னு மணாளன் றானே Devdutt needs to deepen his knowledge instead of imposing western theories of a non unified india and that south identified lanka with ravana only by 10 century . He is unfortunately a half baked and fraud scholar even if his conceptual leaps are very interesting sometimes
Excellent information