When it comes to messing with "Mother Nature" it can be a horrible experience if things don't go as natural as a woman having her own womb to carry and naturing the baby. Things can get difficult and since this is a temporary procedure, one has to be careful about considering acquiring a womb like this. Also, the complication of the law, and the stability of the couple intentions if things don't go as expected. Too many options of what could go wrong is for many not ideal.
This a bad idea. Every day someone comes up with another stupid way to destroy mother nature. Messing with nature can only lead to eventual disaster. I keep feeling there are insidious set pushing buttons and working towards an insidious agenda.
What about women who might have lost their womb 🤔 this is hope for them. Babies don't receive "love and bonding" in the womb, that's something the adults do for the child. I just think you shouldn't see it as "insane" or be negative and try to see the beneficial side and positive of it
@@kimsrurallife8775 people are always wondering about human trafficking and missing persons. You know there’s some creep out there who figured out they can breed their own victims and traffic them nobody would ever know.
Society already screwed because of a certain gender social movement in the 50s, this will help remedy the problems caused by that stupid social experiment.
This was done before back in 1900's by man called Dr. Martin Couney( He wasn't really a doctor) He built a premature baby unit with incubators for the babies, that was supposed to mimic the mothers womb he had nurses there to attend the needs of the babies, thire was controversy over it because it was on Coney Island where there was amusement park built. This was seen as an exhibition, it did so well prominent doctors who had delivered premature babies entrusted him and his work, apparently he saved 90% of all babies whereas the hospitals where losing 90% of theirs so made sense. The parents of these babies never had to pay healthcare as this was all taken care of with admission fees from the public this paid for the running of a hospital and the care of the babies and he was even able to pay the nurses too...... I would be happy for humanity to have something like this but in a more secluded and healthier place. But I'm telling you now the top 1%ers the way shit is going right now, they definitely won't be happy if their plan is to cull the population of the world 😡
@@evgeniynagornyak1150 want programme was that because what I heard was it wasn't an experiment, he genuinely wanted to do good and he did, and if wasn't for self reasons either and.... I didn't agree with the location of the premature maternity hospital, that's what I'll call it , if it hadn't been for the location it wouldn't have gained so much controversy, but he proved everyone of those opposed wrong.... And he was credited by well renowned pediatric doctors , and maternity hospitals because he was able to do what they couldn't do , so I think maybe you have your information mixed up, yes I know there have been cruel horrific experiments carried out on humanity, but this story I refer wasn't an experiment, it was a way to save premature babies, so the 90% of premature babies were not surviving in hospitals after birth. Dr. Martin Couney, turn that number on its head and saved exactly the same percentage of premature babies.
I find this really sick, there is no emotional connection between mother and child. Make a joke about it, but get serious, this is crazy scienctists experimenting. I have two beautiful daughters, and wouldn't part with those wonderful memories of carrying, and delivering them. It wasn't all smooth sailing either.
And what about the beneficial bacteria from the mother's microbiome that the baby gets when it passes through the vaginal canal? Even C-section babies get this beneficial bacteria because there is a special cloth that is put in the mother's vaginal canal that absorbs the microbiome. After they remove the baby he is wiped down with this cloth.
it can be seen as dystopic if you believe this would "replace women" but in the case of premature births it could be life saving, and prevent serious health issues from developing, I think it's a good thing overall, we just have to be careful with how we implement it
I'm sure there will be side effects that we won't know about until they do their research and make it public sometime in the future. Just like evey other artifical thing man has made.
How many babies can you get out of one egg? I believe in humans there has been born eight, but of course out of restrictions of the womb. For food industry this could be a revolution.
The 'privacy' shroud should be removable so nurses and/or technicians can visually inspect the compartment in case anything is going wrong inside. Sensors can only detect so much.
Ungodly and downright riduculous ..its not everyones right to have a child its a blessing .and part of the bond is carrying baby in your own body .....mengale still alive from grave it seems
What? They believe in putting the needs of a premature child before the desires of the adults to see them through the artificial womb? It almost sounds like it goes against "my body, my choice". Also, put the babies in their own rooms where the parents can come to visit and attach some sort of sound system where the baby's can hear the mom's vitals and the father talking when they're away via Bluetooth. Then it'd be perfect. It sickens me how many premature babies born before the limit aren't taken care of even though they come out alive and fighting.
People are so smart they are stupid. What about the relationship between the mother and the uterus? There is a neurological connection between a mother and her unborn child. The in utero baby is not just a sack of meat. My wife loved to sing. Often when she would stop the baby would kick my wife to get her to sing again. The emotional relationship between a mother and the man and wife's baby is shared. Babies in the uterus can recognize voices. ... Humans are not lizards.
Once humans can generate living creatures without a mother, that is when spliced life forms emerge in our society. Ai and artificial wombs is the doorway to hybrid everything including humans. Mixing humans with insects, reptiles, birds, or synthetic DNA codes. ... Total Dystopian Society type of stuff.
The first thing you need to thing is then why are we aborting millions of babies? If we are to save them this is hypocritical and deceptive.... first we kill yet know save why isn’t anyone thinking anymore with critical process. Whoa to those who call evil good and good evil.
@@markjohnson157 Nothing can replace women. For these to work a women's egg and a sperm must be combined in order for the process to even be close to starting.
@@ap_7 well I was thinking as far back as the 1900s but yeah if in 40 years we have this much maybe well finally have canned coochie or genetically engineered cat girls in another 40
I think it could be useful. Just imagine having a biological child of your own without having to be pregnant ! No post-partum depression, no strectch marks, no weight gain, no pain, no low libido, just the joy of having a child. I think that it would be so much less stressful and easier to process for the couple. What do you think ?
@@Tickefect Why is that ? To me, it would be like adopting a child, except that you are adopting your own. Parents who adopt their children do not love them less than the ones who have them naturally.
I just saw this on the BBC. Initially I got excited about the idea that I could possibly have another baby without having to go through a pregnancy - if they begin to allow this as a service for the general public (ie, freeze your eggs and sperm and use an artificial womb at your convenience). But no one is talking about the consequences of a baby growing in one of these VS inside its mother where it feels the rhythm of her movement and the sound of her voice (as well as the voices of the father and siblings if there were any). And what about the hormones released by the mother in response to her environment and how those might affect (positively and negatively) in the baby in the womb? I think as an alternative to the humidicrib, it's fantastic, but it won't rival a real womb, not like this anyway.
I just heard about something similar to this on the radio as well so I looked it up. From what I understand the the idea is to try and save premature babies. The technology, for growing a baby from an embryo to full term, is not there yet. I was thinking the same things as you as far as the implications of a baby growing outside of it’s mother. I think in the case of premature babies that did spend time growing inside it’s mother, this would be a much better alternative to what they do now. I’m not sure how I feel about the idea of people being able to grow their babies in an artificial womb from scratch, it weirds me out a bit. On a side note, You have a beautiful voice!
@@emilymoynihan3963 Oh thanks :) Yes, this kind of technology is a wonderful thing. I jumped ahead of myself and saw where it would lead and saw the convenience of being able to grow your family without having to do the hard miles of pregnancy and birth, but we won't know the consequences of that till it happens. The thought also crossed my mind of how we are playing nature and preventing natural selection from filtering out the weakest, but we already do that anyway with c-sections. I had 3 c-sections so possibly none of my beautiful children would be here if it weren't for medical intervention. I guess you just have to embrace the technology in the end!
Its miracle for me.....I have no uterus ...due to this reason my husband want divorce ..... This is very helpful for me but now not possible this yr....
Fun fact : These all things were present in Mahabharat era 5000 years ago !! Kauravas were born outside of their mother’s womb!! The past is rewinding!!
You Religious followers... Will never understand... How Any scientific evolution happened ... You go find in your religious books...which is always false... You Bigots...😅
@@KSealedvsK Fun fact, ancient texts show that the Lord flooded the earth mostly because women were drinking tonics (like our modern pills) to avoid birth, and is one of the main reasons of the "evil" that is largely unmentioned in the modern translated texts.
@@asclepius4855 You ignorant atheist bigots, all ancient texts from all cultures point to a previous civilization that was more advanced than what we are now, wiped out by God and other cataclysms. Macro evolution still has yet to be proven other than by abrupt cosmic events.
@@Eighteenxray oh I believe it....There are many events covered up by governments, to disguise any existence of God. Another good one is the giant (Nephilim) skeleton remains found across the world. With two rows of molars for teeth, during a time when the earth was plentiful with vegetation. None displayed for public to view. Skeletal remains discovered, and locked away....
I was an early baby and my Mum would have loved this option if it was available back then and maybe I would be healthier now if it had of been. Healthier early babies in the future ❤️
If I had a child prematurely I would not allow anyone to take it to an incubator or an artificial womb, if a child is born prematurely then I will let god decide (1/2)
This was No Dream ages before at the time of Kauravas were born.Vyas , a hermit created vsuch environment and grown 101kauravas from embroyos. are we deciphering old Vedas knowledge from INDIA.🇮🇳❤️
@@digitallocations1423 Yes. Why? Because I know it’s 1) Not natural and 2) it will have disastrous effects for everything short of the environment. I hate to break it too too you chief but my world doesn’t revolve around the environment. It’s important, yes. But so is everything else.
THIS IS EVIL. OUR HEAVENLY FATHER CREATED LIFE. These SCIENTISTS ARE TRYING TO BE GOD AND THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN, THERE IS ONLY ONE LIVING GOD, THEY WILL BE JUDGED ON JESUS RETURN WHICH IS NOT FAR OFF.
Is it just me or does anybody else have a sense of perversion with this?? Like if its to prolonguebthe time in the womb for premies I get it but to start from beginning to end in a rubber belly...where's the bond? The connection? Thats where love comes from..without the bond and connection I fear we will loose love on the way...the first person a child (all of us that are alive today) falls in love with or learns love from is their mother...through primitive attachment..I dont think we should fuck with that. Were gonna have a lot of psychopaths on our ✋
I absolutely agree with you on this one, good for premature babies yes, but otherwise HELL NO! This is not ethical and we humans should know where to draw the line.
heads up: the love left the building with jfk and jimmy hendrix. all we have left is spite and paranoia. best grow kids in a rubber ball then keep them separated from this toxic society as long as possible
DOES THE CRACKHEAD or meth head mother smoking crack/meth/drinking/smoking cigarettes and even wh*ring while pregnant also have a loving bond with her chld?!?🥴 And what about the pregnant woman who is pregnant living with a man who is physically or even verbally and or EMOTIONALLY abusive to the woman don't you think that affects the child in a negative way?!? Also, why is it up to women to bond with the child because it's in their womb, the child is not in the man's womb yet many fathers still have a strong bond with their children....so ur comment does not make sense
human hybrid babies, next half human half animal, just like the old times, greeks and egyptians . that we think is mythology. you know them, those things
no how? you make absolutely no sense. artificial wombs can make babies which are like normal human beings and they cant just magically erase pain and emotions from them.
This is not a good idea because since the baby is physically removed from his mother in this mechanical way, soul will disapate out of the body and will grow up to be a psychopath.
Comment section is just showing human nature. "Oh, finally a way to get rid of [thing/person/group/etc]!" But we really should to be talking instead on how this can give couples (whether a man-man, woman-man, or women-woman relasionship) the chance to have a family if medical risks/inability to have kids for whatever reason/and rather not/can't adopt would prevent them from doing so. This technology could one day allow rape victims or accidental mother unable to provide a good, mentally and physically healthy home environment another way to seperate themselves from the child without the emotional impact and burden of aborting or having to go through hours-long labor before hearing their baby's cry before giving them up for adoption TL,DR: When new technology comes to light, can we please look at what said technology can do for everyone (in this case rape victims and accidental mothers' mental and physical health) versus as a potential weapon against something/someone/anything in general? P.s. sorry for any spelling/grammatical errors. I'm super tired rn!
I agree all the way but the craziest things said about this technology in hopes to replace feminism and SJWs came from these psychopathic MGTOWs I rather want to live to see the between balance of humanism and technology as virtue not some insane agenda to destroy.
@@CyberKid-1995 It's sad these MGTOW feel so emasculated by a woman's ability to carry a child. Like any kind of woman in any position of power freaks them out, they really think they're a persecuted underclass
@@FirstnameLastname-hq5rd No, MGTOW's just want feminism to understand that they have to appreciate men and all the stuff we do as innovators but you know what they do instead? They get family courts to turn against us and all of this biased shit. I'm honestly tired of this because feminism is spreading more and more and men are forgetting their morals year by year. By 2050 men are gonna be kissing women asses like they're queens.
4 роки тому
@@FirstnameLastname-hq5rd Lol nobody cares about that shit, you ignoramus.
@ No they really do. They really hate that women can have children and they see it as a kind of power. 'Fuck You''s comment above yours proves my point. "Future is sexbot+ Arti wombs +arti eggs" Lmao
@TheAstrius Why would men be in control? You think rich women would be prohibited from this technology? You can also create sperm from stem cells. Why would expensive technology be used to create "black market babies"? It's easier to pay poor people for theirs.
Mary Ganser Nope. This is for premature babies, forcing a woman to carry a baby and give birth at 30 weeks is still as fucked up as forcing her to carry it full term. Even if the technology evolves to the point it could safely gestate an embryo from 4 weeks, that should still be a choice. No one should be forced to bring life into the world.
@TheAstrius I'm sure plenty of rich women would prefer to do this than endure all the suffering that comes with pregnancy and birth, if we're talking about artificially growing a child from conception. But yeah I can see why some especially rich men would want a child/an heir but not a wife. I don't agree with the last part. Adoption can be just as beautiful as creating a child from scratch. I genuinely don't understand how some people say they couldn't love a baby that wasn't theirs biologically
You're taking me enjoyment of having a baby from a lot of people God did not create for machines to make babies we are humans we're the ones that are supposed to reproduce and make babies this is an abomination that's disgraceful 😡
This is nothing but the next level of artificial intelligence. By replacing the fundamental principles of life, birth and thought, there is little need for the human experience.
That's Dutch actually, the segment appears to me to be made by Omroep Brabant (public broadcasting channel/network for one of the southern provinces). The TUeCursor channel on youtube must refer to "technische universiteit Eindhoven", literal translation: "technical university Eindhoven". Those are universities that have a more practical/engineering focus than the "normal" ones.
@@sheillaen2nothing said here is in conclusion and you might have misunderstood me. God does provide knowledge and wisdom. With thet we can do good or bad. They are already Advantages with IFV and others technologies developed Forming a womb will also have many benefits to those with difficulties. I'm my mind I thought if this technology misused will not be a good thing e.g of women stopped carrying babies in wombs and go to shops to by one. May be I had more negative on my mind than good to come. I also think as humans we have a choice to do good or bad and I hope this technology will only bring sunshine to those in need of them.
-The children of 2030: "Were you born of an artificial uterus? Hahaha eeww!"
-The children of 2130: "Were you born of a woman? Hahaha eeww!"
it would be more like 2130: "Were you born of a woman? agh...."
2130? More 2040.
Most children will still be born from women. It's just that gays, old, and infertile couples will use AWT technologies.
No more children support
@@domenicocoviello446 Emm... let's be more realistic here.
When it comes to messing with "Mother Nature" it can be a horrible experience if things don't go as natural as a woman having her own womb to carry and naturing the baby. Things can get difficult and since this is a temporary procedure, one has to be careful about considering acquiring a womb like this. Also, the complication of the law, and the stability of the couple intentions if things don't go as expected. Too many options of what could go wrong is for many not ideal.
They are messing with The Heavenly Father and they will answer to HIM.❤
What they want is the womb WITHOUT NEEDING THE WOMAN THAT NORMALLY WOULD SURROUND AND SUSTAIN SAID WOMB.
@@Sheila-o3wYour heavenly father shouldn't make people infertile or have pregnancy complications then.
YES ABSOLUTELY IT'S EVIL.@@Sheila-o3w
I've read enough dystopian novels to know this is a bad idea. 😳
This a bad idea. Every day someone comes up with another stupid way to destroy mother nature.
Messing with nature can only lead to eventual disaster. I keep feeling there are insidious set pushing buttons and working towards an insidious agenda.
That’s some matrix shit hahaha
I think it’s a good idea. If we could also engineer them to be smarter and more stronger that’d be better.
This absolutely insane! Babies receive things like love, bonding etc. That they can't get in a fake womb!
Its not love but nutrient, temperature , hormones...etc when they are in the womb love and bonding are required after the birth.
What about women who might have lost their womb 🤔 this is hope for them.
Babies don't receive "love and bonding" in the womb, that's something the adults do for the child.
I just think you shouldn't see it as "insane" or be negative and try to see the beneficial side and positive of it
You really don't know much do you @@anandisrocking007
@@acidicsoul4978are you mental?
@@moorshound3243 I can tell you someone with anger issues. I gave my opinion without being disrespectful. If you don't like it, go tell your mother
In a world where no one would even think of abusing this option it would have been a great idea.
EXACTLY!!!
Anyone with money would.
If they have this ability then there is no doubt they can engineer super soldier children
One day you can grow your own army in your own basement
You can. You just can’t tell nobody lol
They already are
@@kimsrurallife8775 people are always wondering about human trafficking and missing persons. You know there’s some creep out there who figured out they can breed their own victims and traffic them nobody would ever know.
hahahahap
Stormtroopers eh
That won't end in a happy ending as everyone may think...
Society already screwed because of a certain gender social movement in the 50s, this will help remedy the problems caused by that stupid social experiment.
Nope it sure won't 😢
This was done before back in 1900's by man called Dr. Martin Couney( He wasn't really a doctor) He built a premature baby unit with incubators for the babies, that was supposed to mimic the mothers womb he had nurses there to attend the needs of the babies, thire was controversy over it because it was on Coney Island where there was amusement park built. This was seen as an exhibition, it did so well prominent doctors who had delivered premature babies entrusted him and his work, apparently he saved 90% of all babies whereas the hospitals where losing 90% of theirs so made sense. The parents of these babies never had to pay healthcare as this was all taken care of with admission fees from the public this paid for the running of a hospital and the care of the babies and he was even able to pay the nurses too...... I would be happy for humanity to have something like this but in a more secluded and healthier place. But I'm telling you now the top 1%ers the way shit is going right now, they definitely won't be happy if their plan is to cull the population of the world 😡
I watched that programme with photos
Sad, experiments on humans.
@@evgeniynagornyak1150 want programme was that because what I heard was it wasn't an experiment, he genuinely wanted to do good and he did, and if wasn't for self reasons either and.... I didn't agree with the location of the premature maternity hospital, that's what I'll call it , if it hadn't been for the location it wouldn't have gained so much controversy, but he proved everyone of those opposed wrong.... And he was credited by well renowned pediatric doctors , and maternity hospitals because he was able to do what they couldn't do , so I think maybe you have your information mixed up, yes I know there have been cruel horrific experiments carried out on humanity, but this story I refer wasn't an experiment, it was a way to save premature babies, so the 90% of premature babies were not surviving in hospitals after birth. Dr. Martin Couney, turn that number on its head and saved exactly the same percentage of premature babies.
@@damienhyland5951source?
I find this really sick, there is no emotional connection between mother and child.
Make a joke about it, but get serious, this is crazy scienctists experimenting.
I have two beautiful daughters, and wouldn't part with those wonderful memories of carrying, and delivering them.
It wasn't all smooth sailing either.
Nightmare meaning anyone can just buy babies for crime it’s actually scary
Crazy world we live in; one side is killing babies and the other is growing Frankenstein's.
This is the price you people pay for being gynocentric.
And what about the beneficial bacteria from the mother's microbiome that the baby gets when it passes through the vaginal canal? Even C-section babies get this beneficial bacteria because there is a special cloth that is put in the mother's vaginal canal that absorbs the microbiome. After they remove the baby he is wiped down with this cloth.
Do they have a soul? It's not a blessing from above it's like a human who invented them😢
lol
you are delusional
Without human invention and progress in medicine many more mothers and babies would have complications at birth (and death)
God have mercy on this lost world I pray this never happen
it can be seen as dystopic if you believe this would "replace women" but in the case of premature births it could be life saving, and prevent serious health issues from developing, I think it's a good thing overall, we just have to be careful with how we implement it
Luckily humans always use technology responsibly. 🙄
With the amount of women hating comments I’ve seen around this topic, I am not very optimistic about this.
this should NOT be allowed . AT ALL.
Cope it will happen.
Its INSANE
I'm sure there will be side effects that we won't know about until they do their research and make it public sometime in the future. Just like evey other artifical thing man has made.
tbh this is the only truly moral path forward for those who are against abortion.
How many babies can you get out of one egg? I believe in humans there has been born eight, but of course out of restrictions of the womb. For food industry this could be a revolution.
It could replace women also
We can currently create eggs from skin cells. The biochemical environment of the womb is the last limiting factor that science has not yet replicated.
we should pull a promised neverland
@@lostforevermore7150 no i dont think so women are not baby making machines
@@snowflake4087 for the most part that is their primary function as humans.
It won't work for the same reasons that a woman in an irreversible coma on life support can't carry a child.
And child not connected emotionally to mother
The 'privacy' shroud should be removable so nurses and/or technicians can visually inspect the compartment in case anything is going wrong inside. Sensors can only detect so much.
Dystopian Nightmare! That is just horrifying.
Ungodly and downright riduculous ..its not everyones right to have a child its a blessing .and part of the bond is carrying baby in your own body .....mengale still alive from grave it seems
Welcome to the matrix people buckle up.👀
What? They believe in putting the needs of a premature child before the desires of the adults to see them through the artificial womb? It almost sounds like it goes against "my body, my choice". Also, put the babies in their own rooms where the parents can come to visit and attach some sort of sound system where the baby's can hear the mom's vitals and the father talking when they're away via Bluetooth. Then it'd be perfect. It sickens me how many premature babies born before the limit aren't taken care of even though they come out alive and fighting.
People are so smart they are stupid. What about the relationship between the mother and the uterus? There is a neurological connection between a mother and her unborn child. The in utero baby is not just a sack of meat. My wife loved to sing. Often when she would stop the baby would kick my wife to get her to sing again. The emotional relationship between a mother and the man and wife's baby is shared. Babies in the uterus can recognize voices. ... Humans are not lizards.
No weight gain, no stretch marks, no labour - none of the complications that make birth horrendous. This is a great breakthrough
Once humans can generate living creatures without a mother, that is when spliced life forms emerge in our society. Ai and artificial wombs is the doorway to hybrid everything including humans. Mixing humans with insects, reptiles, birds, or synthetic DNA codes. ... Total Dystopian Society type of stuff.
@@wft15 people get fat without pregnancy so your point is invalid..
@@psam8277 people can get fat without pregnancy, yes! But pregnancy also makes you fat, so it is valid. What a stupid comment 🙄
Breastfeeding is still essential for the immune system to develop
To be able to save a child is wonderful no matter how.
I never understand how dudes don’t care about abortion but as soon as a pregnant person dies or has a miscarriage it’s no longer a clump of cells
@@vikzn1607 True they are just lying to themselves that abortion is not killing if they think this is saving lives.
The first thing you need to thing is then why are we aborting millions of babies? If we are to save them this is hypocritical and deceptive.... first we kill yet know save why isn’t anyone thinking anymore with critical process. Whoa to those who call evil good and good evil.
Would this replace a woman in the future
@@markjohnson157 Nothing can replace women. For these to work a women's egg and a sperm must be combined in order for the process to even be close to starting.
Factory babies lacking human connections...
@Shruti Tripathy end of the women(feminists)...
@@sarkarkondattam You mean bach bazi ? 😂🤣
in the last 100 years humanity has progressed so far imagine another 100 years
More like how humanity has progressed the last 40 years.
@@ap_7 well I was thinking as far back as the 1900s but yeah if in 40 years we have this much maybe well finally have canned coochie or genetically engineered cat girls in another 40
@@ashplattsii1fan92 Too far bro
I think it could be useful. Just imagine having a biological child of your own without having to be pregnant ! No post-partum depression, no strectch marks, no weight gain, no pain, no low libido, just the joy of having a child. I think that it would be so much less stressful and easier to process for the couple. What do you think ?
Sonds good
The joy won‘t be the same
@@Tickefect Why is that ? To me, it would be like adopting a child, except that you are adopting your own. Parents who adopt their children do not love them less than the ones who have them naturally.
@@Tickefect it would be
Being pregnant was the best experience I ever had!
I just saw this on the BBC. Initially I got excited about the idea that I could possibly have another baby without having to go through a pregnancy - if they begin to allow this as a service for the general public (ie, freeze your eggs and sperm and use an artificial womb at your convenience). But no one is talking about the consequences of a baby growing in one of these VS inside its mother where it feels the rhythm of her movement and the sound of her voice (as well as the voices of the father and siblings if there were any). And what about the hormones released by the mother in response to her environment and how those might affect (positively and negatively) in the baby in the womb? I think as an alternative to the humidicrib, it's fantastic, but it won't rival a real womb, not like this anyway.
I just heard about something similar to this on the radio as well so I looked it up. From what I understand the the idea is to try and save premature babies. The technology, for growing a baby from an embryo to full term, is not there yet. I was thinking the same things as you as far as the implications of a baby growing outside of it’s mother. I think in the case of premature babies that did spend time growing inside it’s mother, this would be a much better alternative to what they do now. I’m not sure how I feel about the idea of people being able to grow their babies in an artificial womb from scratch, it weirds me out a bit.
On a side note, You have a beautiful voice!
@@emilymoynihan3963 Oh thanks :) Yes, this kind of technology is a wonderful thing. I jumped ahead of myself and saw where it would lead and saw the convenience of being able to grow your family without having to do the hard miles of pregnancy and birth, but we won't know the consequences of that till it happens. The thought also crossed my mind of how we are playing nature and preventing natural selection from filtering out the weakest, but we already do that anyway with c-sections. I had 3 c-sections so possibly none of my beautiful children would be here if it weren't for medical intervention. I guess you just have to embrace the technology in the end!
Well of course people are going to think about things like that to by using radio sound or creating movement
@@ZgermanGuy. That will help as much as the virtual world helps the rest of us I guess.. better than nothing.
@@cocosilkworm agree better than letting premature babies die. It will have to be seen what effects it will have on newborn in the future
Ultimately world can free itself from women..... 😆😆
Its miracle for me.....I have no uterus ...due to this reason my husband want divorce ..... This is very helpful for me but now not possible this yr....
Fun fact : These all things were present in Mahabharat era 5000 years ago !! Kauravas were born outside of their mother’s womb!! The past is rewinding!!
Fun Fact- God flooded the earth, & Noah’s ark was used roughly around that time as well.
You Religious followers... Will never understand...
How Any scientific evolution happened ...
You go find in your religious books...which is always false...
You Bigots...😅
@@KSealedvsK Fun fact, ancient texts show that the Lord flooded the earth mostly because women were drinking tonics (like our modern pills) to avoid birth, and is one of the main reasons of the "evil" that is largely unmentioned in the modern translated texts.
@@asclepius4855 You ignorant atheist bigots, all ancient texts from all cultures point to a previous civilization that was more advanced than what we are now, wiped out by God and other cataclysms. Macro evolution still has yet to be proven other than by abrupt cosmic events.
@@Eighteenxray oh I believe it....There are many events covered up by governments, to disguise any existence of God.
Another good one is the giant (Nephilim) skeleton remains found across the world. With two rows of molars for teeth, during a time when the earth was plentiful with vegetation. None displayed for public to view. Skeletal remains discovered, and locked away....
Nightmare
GURL PREACH XD!!!
no
I was an early baby and my Mum would have loved this option if it was available back then and maybe I would be healthier now if it had of been. Healthier early babies in the future ❤️
Have you watched the ending of the Matrix?
This should only be done with babies with the aforementioned problems
The vast majority of humans shouldn't use this dystopian method
Weirdo
Oh please 🙏 I was a 8 month old baby and I'm so sick now just waiting for the END😂❤
Wrong. Its a dream. Humans always use if or but. Understandable. Reality is opposite.
soulless vessels are what demons need to get a foot hold on this dimension of reality
scizoid take
One can only imagine the level of manipulation that would take place!!
The matrix.... Human farming...
The book a Brave New World.
This is some craziness.
Wow! Looks like something from Alien!
A ball formation seems great... however you must have a window to see the child to ensure your eyes are watching the child not just the read-outs!
If I had a child prematurely I would not allow anyone to take it to an incubator or an artificial womb, if a child is born prematurely then I will let god decide (1/2)
What happens to the child, for in my mind, if a child is not to live, then it shall not live (2/2)
If god is responsible for everything then he blessed us with medical intervention to save our babies. Idiot
@@XXSAZILLAYT yeah totally
This was No Dream ages before at the time of Kauravas were born.Vyas , a hermit created vsuch environment and grown 101kauravas from embroyos. are we deciphering old Vedas knowledge from INDIA.🇮🇳❤️
Its not cutting something in to 100 parts and put in to ghee pots.. Stfu
Most probably done From totipotent stem cells
Of embryo
I how human recreate This Tech again so that
Some great genes aren't lost
But kaurav ki history dekh kar lagta hai ki aisa birth unke liye lucky nahi raha😂
The one main thing they forget entirely is the maternal connection. That is an essential part of the growth of a child (animal).
Agreed.
Absolute bs..
This is great for men
Amen
@Kroasan no you dont do your reseach
If women refuses to give eggs, can a man propose cancelling the sperm bank, too
@Kroasan Japan scientists already discover the male skin cell to produce egg.
Even better for women, pregnancy is horrific
What in the SCI FI
and before the fall no one would draw a line in the sand so no one could find the edged and they fell.
If this is allowed to be reported, then my assumption would be this has been in practice a long time
Full ectogenesis will be a dream!
Agreed. Imagine never having to fear population decline or over-population. Premature births. Etc.
Can't wait!
@@rainbowsixODST
Do you honestly fear those things?
@@digitallocations1423 Yes. Why? Because I know it’s 1) Not natural and 2) it will have disastrous effects for everything short of the environment. I hate to break it too too you chief but my world doesn’t revolve around the environment. It’s important, yes. But so is everything else.
@@rainbowsixODST well it does, if the environment stops being habitable people will die, so it is probably the most important thing
THIS IS EVIL. OUR HEAVENLY FATHER CREATED LIFE.
These SCIENTISTS ARE TRYING TO BE GOD AND THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN, THERE IS ONLY ONE LIVING GOD, THEY WILL BE JUDGED ON JESUS RETURN WHICH IS NOT FAR OFF.
Raised by wolf here we come.. jokes aside this can help a lot of prematures and so on
Don't incubators work anymore?
This will breed weakness into humanity. People that can't make children can make children. Restore the sacredness of the living womb.
Yeah but too many people don’t get it
Men replacing women
Only rich will get... Mulfuntion womb they scrap the baby with womb... This another murder
Is it just me or does anybody else have a sense of perversion with this?? Like if its to prolonguebthe time in the womb for premies I get it but to start from beginning to end in a rubber belly...where's the bond? The connection? Thats where love comes from..without the bond and connection I fear we will loose love on the way...the first person a child (all of us that are alive today) falls in love with or learns love from is their mother...through primitive attachment..I dont think we should fuck with that. Were gonna have a lot of psychopaths on our ✋
I absolutely agree with you on this one, good for premature babies yes, but otherwise HELL NO! This is not ethical and we humans should know where to draw the line.
heads up: the love left the building with jfk and jimmy hendrix. all we have left is spite and paranoia. best grow kids in a rubber ball then keep them separated from this toxic society as long as possible
DOES THE CRACKHEAD or meth head mother smoking crack/meth/drinking/smoking cigarettes and even wh*ring while pregnant also have a loving bond with her chld?!?🥴
And what about the pregnant woman who is pregnant living with a man who is physically or even verbally and or EMOTIONALLY abusive to the woman don't you think that affects the child in a negative way?!?
Also, why is it up to women to bond with the child because it's in their womb, the child is not in the man's womb yet many fathers still have a strong bond with their children....so ur comment does not make sense
I agree.
human hybrid babies, next half human half animal, just like the old times, greeks and egyptians . that we think is mythology. you know them, those things
That would be quite the plot twist 💀 History does repeat itself doesn’t it?
Imagine electricity blows out what would happen to the babies in these artificial wombs🥺
Most important comment
Bakc up generator
👆 what the last guy said.
Back up generators, built in battery packs, etc. Lots of options. So don’t worry.
@Decanon he prob not
No need to worry! The cloned embryos will be able to develop nicely in these. After birth, all you have to do is chip them and that's it!
So you can create one that doesn’t feel pain or emotions
no how? you make absolutely no sense. artificial wombs can make babies which are like normal human beings and they cant just magically erase pain and emotions from them.
This is amazing and I support it! Also, we should make a nutrition patch. You get all your daily nutrients through skin absorption vs ingestion.
Yeah let's just not be human anymore. No pregnancy, no food, what are they going to take away next? And what will that make us evolve into?
Right, remove as many things that make us human as possible
This is not a good idea because since the baby is physically removed from his mother in this mechanical way, soul will disapate out of the body and will grow up to be a psychopath.
based on what?
Based on the function of the mechanical universe in the aqueous aethers of space.@@yeetman4953
You do know that God has created all things. And what you are doing goes against God.. not good to do this...
Comment section is just showing human nature. "Oh, finally a way to get rid of [thing/person/group/etc]!"
But we really should to be talking instead on how this can give couples (whether a man-man, woman-man, or women-woman relasionship) the chance to have a family if medical risks/inability to have kids for whatever reason/and rather not/can't adopt would prevent them from doing so.
This technology could one day allow rape victims or accidental mother unable to provide a good, mentally and physically healthy home environment another way to seperate themselves from the child without the emotional impact and burden of aborting or having to go through hours-long labor before hearing their baby's cry before giving them up for adoption
TL,DR: When new technology comes to light, can we please look at what said technology can do for everyone (in this case rape victims and accidental mothers' mental and physical health) versus as a potential weapon against something/someone/anything in general?
P.s. sorry for any spelling/grammatical errors. I'm super tired rn!
I agree all the way but the craziest things said about this technology in hopes to replace feminism and SJWs came from these psychopathic MGTOWs
I rather want to live to see the between balance of humanism and technology as virtue not some insane agenda to destroy.
@@CyberKid-1995 It's sad these MGTOW feel so emasculated by a woman's ability to carry a child. Like any kind of woman in any position of power freaks them out, they really think they're a persecuted underclass
@@FirstnameLastname-hq5rd No, MGTOW's just want feminism to understand that they have to appreciate men and all the stuff we do as innovators but you know what they do instead? They get family courts to turn against us and all of this biased shit. I'm honestly tired of this because feminism is spreading more and more and men are forgetting their morals year by year. By 2050 men are gonna be kissing women asses like they're queens.
@@FirstnameLastname-hq5rd Lol nobody cares about that shit, you ignoramus.
@ No they really do. They really hate that women can have children and they see it as a kind of power. 'Fuck You''s comment above yours proves my point. "Future is sexbot+ Arti wombs +arti eggs" Lmao
This will hopefully lead to the end of Roe v Wade:)
It would still be prohibitively expensive for the vast majority of mothers.
@TheAstrius Why would men be in control? You think rich women would be prohibited from this technology? You can also create sperm from stem cells. Why would expensive technology be used to create "black market babies"? It's easier to pay poor people for theirs.
Mary Ganser Nope. This is for premature babies, forcing a woman to carry a baby and give birth at 30 weeks is still as fucked up as forcing her to carry it full term. Even if the technology evolves to the point it could safely gestate an embryo from 4 weeks, that should still be a choice. No one should be forced to bring life into the world.
@TheAstrius I'm sure plenty of rich women would prefer to do this than endure all the suffering that comes with pregnancy and birth, if we're talking about artificially growing a child from conception. But yeah I can see why some especially rich men would want a child/an heir but not a wife.
I don't agree with the last part. Adoption can be just as beautiful as creating a child from scratch. I genuinely don't understand how some people say they couldn't love a baby that wasn't theirs biologically
After it the artificial womb develops men will erase women from the face of Earth,as they are just dead weight now.
But this ain’t right
how do you pronounce his name? professor Guid Oei
This is like something from a horror movie
You're taking me enjoyment of having a baby from a lot of people God did not create for machines to make babies we are humans we're the ones that are supposed to reproduce and make babies this is an abomination that's disgraceful 😡
This is nothing but the next level of artificial intelligence. By replacing the fundamental principles of life, birth and thought, there is little need for the human experience.
Them explaining it in German doesn't make it any more comforting.
That's Dutch actually, the segment appears to me to be made by Omroep Brabant (public broadcasting channel/network for one of the southern provinces). The TUeCursor channel on youtube must refer to "technische universiteit Eindhoven", literal translation: "technical university Eindhoven". Those are universities that have a more practical/engineering focus than the "normal" ones.
Can't wait for it
same here
Basically Aldous Huxley's idea in "Brave New World"
We can NOT be that a supersize that this eventually happening.
Disturbing dystopian scenario unless it solve the declining fertility rate
Okay this just like the movie Replica with K.O'Reeves😱
This is nightmare for humanity,though the devil will make it looks better than God's creation
Billion dollar question: But why tho?
No child support money anymore ..
"In the year 2525"..... much sooner.
Keep playing God. Youll see
One day scientists will surely get success. Best wishes from our side.
This is some Frankenstein level stuff going on here.
I am an atheist who will support any religious group that is against this.
May The Son of Man come swiftly to save mankind from today's evils..
Doctor:Were you born Vaginal or Artificial
Patient:Artificial
Doctor: Yep cloned and chipped as well
Patient huh?
🤣😆🤣😆😅😃🤣 way to go
@Lia Khan i didnt think nothing like that were good
@Lia Khan you too amen
It looks it can make a chimera
When will be available artificial womb because my 2 premature babies dead ,I wait for this technology
Nightmare !!!!
Absolutely horrific.
no more child support
Creepy.
For premature babies it s okay but for baby farming it is no no no
Thats why there is a government. Im sure in the future they could regulate this.
The problem is that the population of western countries is collapsing so that might actually be our only option.
That That's when God is going to intervene and say enough is a nough.
Oh please!! If God wanted to stop this... he would have stop so many so called "evil" things that camr before. Like IVF, IUI, or even cloning.
@@sheillaen2 Gurl quit it with your anti Christian debocle I mean there's social media for that...
@@sheillaen2 and don't blame it on God we all make choices its just whether or not they were good
@@sheillaen2nothing said here is in conclusion and you might have misunderstood me. God does provide knowledge and wisdom. With thet we can do good or bad. They are already Advantages with IFV and others technologies developed Forming a womb will also have many benefits to those with difficulties. I'm my mind I thought if this technology misused will not be a good thing e.g of women stopped carrying babies in wombs and go to shops to by one. May be I had more negative on my mind than good to come. I also think as humans we have a choice to do good or bad and I hope this technology will only bring sunshine to those in need of them.
Soulless. They are creating soulless people. This is an abomination
Why????? 🤔
They better be I want to have children but I don't want to put up with the baby's momma
What do you want children for?
Energiebesparend, gaat goed werken op wiebelstroom .
Heb je straks goede longen om stikstof op te snuiven.
Well this is horrifying ....
this well help many children once its perfected.