I'm still surprised that no news outlet (as far as I've seen) has gotten permission to use Reed Timmers amazing footage of that Greenfield multi vortex tornado.
@@dominusanuli3595 Nah this tornado was no mere "Dead Man Walking". Had such wild multiple-vortex structure in Reed's Footage.. the whole funnel being interwoven with subvortices making it look like a giant oversized Twizzler. As far as my knowledge goes, one of the most unique Tornadoes ever recorded, with likely nothing similar in appearance ever even seen before.
*Fujita, and technically it's the Enhanced Fujita scale now. They are also ranked based on the damage they left behind, which this one didn't hit Greenfield at it's full force, otherwise, there would have been much MUCH worse damage.
@@drlard_ lol at my auto correct. I like Fujitsu Scale better now. Yes everyone knows how the scale works. My whole point is we now can measure exactly how strong the winds are in a tornado which is what the point of the scale was to begin with. Just because more peoples homes weren’t destroyed doesn’t mean the rating shouldn’t be an F5. Use the new knowledge to be more accurate in conjunction with the damage indicators.
@@PhilipWe we all know that. Do you not understand what my point is. The scale is outdated. You don’t need damage indicators to measure wind speed anymore. We know the exact wind speeds. Which was the whole purpose of the fujita scale to begin with.
@@rosewetzel8284 since the scale is based on damage caused, the rating varies a lot. There's some general markers they use to kind of dilneate categories, but the difference between 4 and 5 is mainly the damage caused to structures. If it didn't hit as many structures, it's going to have an overall "lower" impact on the rating, despite some of the other things that tell us this was definitely worthy of a higher rating.
Oklahoma 1999 was F5 with confirmed 300+ if they had proper equipment, I bet that Jarrell 1997 was also 300+ ( regardless slowmover or not ). Besides this EF scale should be thrown away as far as those cars never found after Jarrell monster.
@@delzermitch Even though you're getting the "260MPH" estimate from the old Fujita scale, it still sounds about right. I just don't see the Jarrell F5 being 300+MPH.. otherwise it would've caused a *lot* more utter destruction with it's painfully-slow 20MPH travel speed. Not to say that it wasn't a complete beast.. as it left a trench as deep as 16 inches. If you're looking for potential unrecognized 300+MPH tornadoes, then you 'ought to look at some of the 'Nadoes from the 4/27/2011 Super Outbreak. Specifically the Smithville and Philadelphia EF5's.. which were the 2 biggest monsters that day and left behind simply *unholy* levels of damage. Smithville EF5 "granulating" a funeral home and tearing apart the welds on a metal pipe being carred on a truck, and the Philadelphia EF5 setting the record *2-foot* deep trench in the ground made of _hard clay._
Yes, and some of these tornadoes have questionable wind speed estimates. For example, the Smithville EF5 Tornado supposedly had winds of 205 mph, but it did Jarrell levels of damage while moving around 60mph. That is insane! No way a tornado with 205 mph winds can do that level of damage while moving at 60 mph. It'd have to have had winds of 300+ do cause that level of damage so quickly. That's just one example too.
1:02 "On the ground for more than a mile..." Trust major news outlets to always get the important details wrong. That of course would be exceedingly unimpressive for a large tornado, since the longest lived can go more than 100 miles. It is also completely wrong. This tornado was on the ground for 43 miles. I thought maybe they mixed up their data and the tornado was a mile wide, but it actually wasn't, more like 3/4 of a mile. Although, on second though, it was on the ground for "more than" a mile, lol
The EF scale needs an upgrade, a revision, or at least an accompanying wind scale. I argue this with the 2013 El-Reno tornado because, despite the winds of that tornado exceeding 320mph, it was only rated an EF3 because it smashed an outhouse as it was forming. If those winds hit Oklahoma City, with that size, it would have earned EF5 in an instant. But because it tracked mostly over open fields, it was given a VERY misleading rating. There needs to be a scale rating wind speeds alongside the typical EF scale, which only logs damage so people don't assume that, because a tornado is only rated EF3, the winds aren't capable of far greater damage. Damage is purely an environmental factor, people may get the wrong idea and think that, because this tornado only did EF2 damage, the winds must not have been anything to worry about. Keep the EF damage scale but PLEASE add a wind speed scale. The more information the public knows, the better they can prepare.
The rating for a tornado isn't based upon actual wind speeds, but the damage that they leave behind. A tornado can have 300MPH wind speeds, but if that wind speed doesn't impact a structure that's built well enough, weakens before hitting well-built structures or doesn't impact any structure at all, then the rating wouldn't be EF5.
Stupidly called it an ef4? You’re the one being stupid. It is an ef4. It’s not based on windspeed but on damage the tornado did. If you’re not a structural engineer who visited greenfield to rate the damage then you shouldn’t talk about it in this way.
@@dsb225Well he’s not wrong. The NWS rates the damage. Not based on wind speeds And also the 300 mph winds was ONLY found about 160 feet above the ground, so it’s likely the winds were much lower at the bottom. Perhaps 190 or 170
If those tornadoes had F5 strength on the original scale then would be rated EF4 or lower on the EF scale. That doesn’t mean that increased number of EF5s.
@@cyndlehick9777 Only to other people. We mean nothing at the end of the day. We haven't been around for even half a percentage of the universes creation. Sucks to accept it but its true.
I live about an hour away from that community. The thing that amazed me when I first saw the video was how it turned everything it touched into confetti. No big chunks. Everything was ground down. It was amazing. Lived in tornado Alley all my life but if these little tornadoes can do that kind of damage. I don't know if hiding in the basement is going to be enough.
I can't imagine how much worse it would've been if that tornado hit Greenfield when it was at top speed. It looked so monstrous and terrifying when it was tearing through those open fields before it hit the town
For a tornado strong as Greenfield with winds of 309-318 mph (497-512 km/h), Victoria police officers are very likely get sucked up by the tornado, and send them flying around the vortex.
@@evanguillory5046 True, but when he was referring to “that” he means the powerfulness that it has. It had wind speeds of over 300mph and so did the May 3rd tornado, plus it was a mile wide.
We will see things we once thought impossible. Magnetosphere is getting weaker. More energy coming in and it affects everything. Lookup suspicious observers.
That was a F5 or EF5. I'm from Kansas I've seen damage like that as well as storms like that. The past decade or so NWS has been underrating ALOT of storms. Maybe for insurance purposes... SMH 😞
the EF scale estimates the ground wind speeds by observing damage any twister leaves behind. It may have had wind speeds in excess of 300 miles per hour, but the damage it left behind was able to confirm the tornado had wind speeds of at least 185 miles per hour, earning it an EF4 rating.
Seems to be a High End EF4 based on damage. You usually need 2 EF5 indicators to prove the tornado could constantly produce that level of damage. Hence, the forbidden rating.
Pleeeeease......Reed Timmer got not only the same data but actual video from multiple ground angles and drone footage that follows the tornado that is WAAAY UP CLOSE! Sorry Wurman😢😢😢
I'm wondering why he's not sold rights or given permission to any news outlet to show his footage. You gotta be crazy to not want that footage aired on your network if you're covering that twister.
@@itsicandy dude, I watched it livestreamed for free on UA-cam. Then rewatched it, and shared it, on his UA-cam channel. He makes his money from the science he actually collects and sells to university or lectures about. Unlike Wurman who leaches off the taxpayer grants. Timmer did in one year what Wurman tried to do in over 10 years and millions of dollars...get ground level radar data of a tornado AND vertical radar data from inside the tornado.
@@itsicandy Because Reed Timmer is not a sell-out to the misinformed media. Not only he makes more money doing what he does now, but he doesn't have the many executives, media advertisements, and the media hosts and anchors jumping up and down his throat.
That tornado went over our house but it was forming must have waited till up at greenfield to drop down as it was forming near corydon Iowa the winds were so strong even without it touching down
And yet the April 27 2011 EF5s were clearly stronger than both of these, despite no official recording and a laughable estimated max wind speed of 210 mph.
the EF scale estimates the ground wind speeds by observing damage any twister leaves behind. It may have had wind speeds in excess of 300 miles per hour, but the damage it left behind was able to confirm the tornado had wind speeds of at least 185 miles per hour, earning it an EF4 rating.
Umm, ef4? Do they not know thier own scales? 300+ mph is ef5, and probably the strongest or close to it in the world....and they say ef4...omg, how d can you be.
@@michaelstrahan2.0 according to the fujita scale, any tornado with winds exceeding 200 mph is a ef(5) had to put quotations around that so your da can see. And you can look that shyt up too..its easy, we have internet....dont reply back. I dont like ignorant people talking to me.
There should be more emphasis on the fact this was measured by radar and not by calculating eg. the force to break a foot of concrete and 2 pieces of rebar. Also I do wonder if they figured in the trench it dug by the windmills. That's a lot of dirt to move.
These storms are real, they produce real damage and cause real fatalities & injuries.....and yet many will flock to the theater to be 'entertained by twister movies' SMH. Why?
Nah but ofc they gave it EF-4 with 185 mph winds cuz nothing was actually capable of showing any EF-5 damage indicators, also the 300 mph winds were further up in the tornado instead of on the ground therefore it can't be that powerful
@kirby456 The only caveat is it had a forward velocity of 70kms an hour. Pretty fast moving for a tornado that size, had it traveled at a traditionally expected speed the damage would've been way more severe.
Voice of God you guys need to film yourself and take more footage and make a miniseries or something at least document it and get paid bigger bucks for the danger you're in
It’s not always about the size, it’s about strength. and what gets to annoy me is how they always focus on damages then wind speeds so I’m rating that a F5 for sure.
Minimise of production in 2025 all countries are if decided this years minimise next year's production if nature's desparation behaviours as or its increases as summer is for example
One of the videos about this tornado looked exceptional, seeing close-ups and aerial views, and the color had a deep tone. I thought it was the best tornado video I've seen, until I saw a comment wondering how a drone could operate next to a tornado.
Thinking it’s fake is just stupid. Reed timmer was driving next to it and a drone was in the sky. You could clearly see the same tornado being filmed and the drone was far enough from the tornado to not be thrown around.
on the original scale it went up to F12 they actually recorded 318mph winds for the greensfiled tornado technically making it the worlds first f6 on the original scale so it’s actually possible
@@keetguyForecasts are 90% accurate 48 hours out. Predictions for a zoned in area are very specific and accurate. You are worse than the Dunning Kruger Effect.
Lol, that tornado reading technology was old when the movie twister came out, that was a loooong time ago, the6 have learned zero since the first movie, they just keep repeating how their "instruments" read wind speed...that's all...nothing new learned in decades...
The tribulation is coming....give your heart ❤️ to Jesus...though the earth be removed and the mountains carried into the midst of the sea... there is a place of peace through The Savior. If you confess with your mouth and believe that He is Lord , you will be saved. Jesus, the name above all other names.
Where did Allah's punishment and destruction come from? It is arrogance and aggression. Look at what you are doing in Gazza. Many of those before you were destroyed by Allah. but you dont know
This is the tornado that hit my town, PEOPLE DIED AND YOUR OUT HERE WITH YOUR FREE PALESTINE?! pathetic get your priorities straight in life, do something useful
Do you know who the Romans were? What you're talking about happened over two thousand years ago on the other side of the ocean. Why do you think it applies to you? The prophecies happened already, and the Latin language is considered to be a dead language. Wow, the people who crucified Jesus of Nazareth, and you think it's about you.
Let’s just hope this is a one time thing. Though I did see a documentary that explained how tornados maybe getting stronger and moving more towards the north from the observed shifting of the jet stream and a few other stuff. Which may or may not have been caused by climate changes. 🫠
Have you heard of Canadian winters? Here's a video taken along Lake Erie the day before Christmas last year. If you go to the end of the point on the left you can see Buffalo across the lake. You can see there is no snow, no ice, no wind and I'm riding a bicycle without a winter coat. 34 seconds. ua-cam.com/video/-_Lert0qjhk/v-deo.html
I live about an hour away from that community. The thing that amazed me when I first saw the video was how it turned everything it touched into confetti. No big chunks. Everything was ground down. It was amazing. Lived in tornado Alley all my life but if these little tornadoes can do that kind of damage. I don't know if hiding in the basement is going to be enough.
I'm still surprised that no news outlet (as far as I've seen) has gotten permission to use Reed Timmers amazing footage of that Greenfield multi vortex tornado.
Reed has a strong distaste for mainstream media these days due to previous experience working with them
DeAd MaN wAlKiNg
IIRC, it has some language that would need to be bleeped out.
@@dominusanuli3595 Nah this tornado was no mere "Dead Man Walking". Had such wild multiple-vortex structure in Reed's Footage.. the whole funnel being interwoven with subvortices making it look like a giant oversized Twizzler.
As far as my knowledge goes, one of the most unique Tornadoes ever recorded, with likely nothing similar in appearance ever even seen before.
The Fujitsu scale needs another refresh to keep up with technology. This is an EF5 level tornado and we all know it.
*Fujita, and technically it's the Enhanced Fujita scale now. They are also ranked based on the damage they left behind, which this one didn't hit Greenfield at it's full force, otherwise, there would have been much MUCH worse damage.
@@drlard_ lol at my auto correct. I like Fujitsu Scale better now. Yes everyone knows how the scale works. My whole point is we now can measure exactly how strong the winds are in a tornado which is what the point of the scale was to begin with. Just because more peoples homes weren’t destroyed doesn’t mean the rating shouldn’t be an F5. Use the new knowledge to be more accurate in conjunction with the damage indicators.
Agreed. This was the last straw. The EF5 drought is just a bunch of crap anyway.
It’s not an ef5. It didn’t cause enough damage…
@@PhilipWe we all know that. Do you not understand what my point is. The scale is outdated. You don’t need damage indicators to measure wind speed anymore. We know the exact wind speeds. Which was the whole purpose of the fujita scale to begin with.
This tornado lofted debris into the air over 40,000 feet, and threw a truck like 300 yards, which is absolutely insane.
That's higher than an airplane flys. Crazy stuff!!
So they’re still certain that this tornado was an EF4 and not an EF5?
@@rosewetzel8284 since the scale is based on damage caused, the rating varies a lot. There's some general markers they use to kind of dilneate categories, but the difference between 4 and 5 is mainly the damage caused to structures. If it didn't hit as many structures, it's going to have an overall "lower" impact on the rating, despite some of the other things that tell us this was definitely worthy of a higher rating.
That's probably the craziest statistic I've ever seen
Point: EF4s only flip or throw cars, EF5s can throw cars hundreds of yards. This tornado threw a car hundreds of yards away
Downright scary. Sad for the loss of life and homes.
Wow.. Josh is unrecognizable from when I remember seeing him chasing.
I thought the same thing. Only his voice is recognizable lol
Too many burger kings
300 mph wind speed Sounds an awful lot like like an f5 to me
Oklahoma 1999 was F5 with confirmed 300+ if they had proper equipment, I bet that Jarrell 1997 was also 300+ ( regardless slowmover or not ). Besides this EF scale should be thrown away as far as those cars never found after Jarrell monster.
Plus those were likely 300 on the ground, this one wasn't.
Bridge creek moore in 1999 was one, the other one was El Reno 2013, jarrell 1997 was around 260 mph
@@delzermitch Even though you're getting the "260MPH" estimate from the old Fujita scale, it still sounds about right.
I just don't see the Jarrell F5 being 300+MPH.. otherwise it would've caused a *lot* more utter destruction with it's painfully-slow 20MPH travel speed. Not to say that it wasn't a complete beast.. as it left a trench as deep as 16 inches.
If you're looking for potential unrecognized 300+MPH tornadoes, then you 'ought to look at some of the 'Nadoes from the 4/27/2011 Super Outbreak. Specifically the Smithville and Philadelphia EF5's.. which were the 2 biggest monsters that day and left behind simply *unholy* levels of damage. Smithville EF5 "granulating" a funeral home and tearing apart the welds on a metal pipe being carred on a truck, and the Philadelphia EF5 setting the record *2-foot* deep trench in the ground made of _hard clay._
@@delzermitchJarrells tornado wind speed is unknown. 260 mph isn't actual speed, it's just the point where F5 level begins.
Yes, and some of these tornadoes have questionable wind speed estimates. For example, the Smithville EF5 Tornado supposedly had winds of 205 mph, but it did Jarrell levels of damage while moving around 60mph. That is insane! No way a tornado with 205 mph winds can do that level of damage while moving at 60 mph. It'd have to have had winds of 300+ do cause that level of damage so quickly. That's just one example too.
1:02 "On the ground for more than a mile..." Trust major news outlets to always get the important details wrong. That of course would be exceedingly unimpressive for a large tornado, since the longest lived can go more than 100 miles. It is also completely wrong. This tornado was on the ground for 43 miles. I thought maybe they mixed up their data and the tornado was a mile wide, but it actually wasn't, more like 3/4 of a mile. Although, on second though, it was on the ground for "more than" a mile, lol
You mean the greenfield EF4 tornado was 0.9 miles wide, yes it was initially 3/4 of a mile wide but rated EF3.
The EF scale needs an upgrade, a revision, or at least an accompanying wind scale.
I argue this with the 2013 El-Reno tornado because, despite the winds of that tornado exceeding 320mph, it was only rated an EF3 because it smashed an outhouse as it was forming. If those winds hit Oklahoma City, with that size, it would have earned EF5 in an instant. But because it tracked mostly over open fields, it was given a VERY misleading rating.
There needs to be a scale rating wind speeds alongside the typical EF scale, which only logs damage so people don't assume that, because a tornado is only rated EF3, the winds aren't capable of far greater damage.
Damage is purely an environmental factor, people may get the wrong idea and think that, because this tornado only did EF2 damage, the winds must not have been anything to worry about.
Keep the EF damage scale but PLEASE add a wind speed scale.
The more information the public knows, the better they can prepare.
Wouldn’t that put it in EF5 territory?
yes
The rating for a tornado isn't based upon actual wind speeds, but the damage that they leave behind. A tornado can have 300MPH wind speeds, but if that wind speed doesn't impact a structure that's built well enough, weakens before hitting well-built structures or doesn't impact any structure at all, then the rating wouldn't be EF5.
EF5 tornados are usually more wide. A wider tornado has the potential to cause more damage.
See that’s the thing. It moved twice as fast as a typical tornado. If it were to move at typical speed there would definitely had been EF5 damage.
@@shadetree1175no
I told people it was a EF 5 but they stupidly called it a EF 4 🤦🏿♂️
Stupidly called it an ef4? You’re the one being stupid. It is an ef4. It’s not based on windspeed but on damage the tornado did. If you’re not a structural engineer who visited greenfield to rate the damage then you shouldn’t talk about it in this way.
You can't have a tornado be rated Ef5 without the damage to confirm it.
@@gamingwitharlen2267 if you say so
@@dsb225Well he’s not wrong. The NWS rates the damage. Not based on wind speeds And also the 300 mph winds was ONLY found about 160 feet above the ground, so it’s likely the winds were much lower at the bottom. Perhaps 190 or 170
@@dsb225therefore since the wind on the ground was either 190 or 170. That tornado gets a ef4
BRO THATS A EF5!!
Feels like the NWS just doesn’t want to give tornadoes EF5 anymore, kinda stupid.
If those tornadoes had F5 strength on the original scale then would be rated EF4 or lower on the EF scale. That doesn’t mean that increased number of EF5s.
So sorry for the death of those people smh
The Earth's way of shaking off it's fleas
@@Xane_Dragonit’s not hard to be respectful. People are more than fleas.
@@cyndlehick9777 Only to other people. We mean nothing at the end of the day. We haven't been around for even half a percentage of the universes creation. Sucks to accept it but its true.
I live about an hour away from that community. The thing that amazed me when I first saw the video was how it turned everything it touched into confetti. No big chunks. Everything was ground down. It was amazing. Lived in tornado Alley all my life but if these little tornadoes can do that kind of damage. I don't know if hiding in the basement is going to be enough.
I don't really need the first two presenters to repeat the title for me, and only add that 300 MPH is fast.
I can't imagine how much worse it would've been if that tornado hit Greenfield when it was at top speed. It looked so monstrous and terrifying when it was tearing through those open fields before it hit the town
For a tornado strong as Greenfield with winds of 309-318 mph (497-512 km/h), Victoria police officers are very likely get sucked up by the tornado, and send them flying around the vortex.
Imagine that at a mile wide...
May 3rd 1999 tornado:
@@ShreddedRipcord May 31st 2013 Tornado:
@@evanguillory5046 True, but when he was referring to “that” he means the powerfulness that it has. It had wind speeds of over 300mph and so did the May 3rd tornado, plus it was a mile wide.
@@evanguillory5046 The May 20 tornado in Oklahoma did not have wind speeds that powerful, but actually had more damage than both those tornados
@@ShreddedRipcord I put the 31st and it was reffing to the El Reno tornado that was 2.6 miles wide and had estimated wind speeds of above 300 mph
We’re gonna need an ef6 category for this type of tornado
We will see things we once thought impossible. Magnetosphere is getting weaker. More energy coming in and it affects everything. Lookup suspicious observers.
EF's a damage scale. There's no EF6 because you can't measure something higher than "complete devastation" (which is your EF5)
@@htewingEF6 is “Incocievable damage”
EF5 is “Incredible damage”
It was an ef4. Not even an ef5. And an ef6 rating doesn’t exist and it’s not necessary.
Greenfield got pureéd. And the tornado was roping out as well, that's nuts
That was a F5 or EF5. I'm from Kansas I've seen damage like that as well as storms like that. The past decade or so NWS has been underrating ALOT of storms. Maybe for insurance purposes... SMH 😞
the EF scale estimates the ground wind speeds by observing damage any twister leaves behind. It may have had wind speeds in excess of 300 miles per hour, but the damage it left behind was able to confirm the tornado had wind speeds of at least 185 miles per hour, earning it an EF4 rating.
Always love hearing from a self-appointed expert!
Do you work for nws and are you a structural engineer who visited greenfield? I don’t think so. It was an ef4 tornado.
@@Animus-255
The Ef scale still has a history of underestimating the windspeeds of tornados.
You can't have a tornado be rated Ef5 without the damage to confirm it.
OMG, my dear Animals must to be suffering …again and again… oh Lord, please, bless and protect them!!!!!!!
That's an F5. EF4? That's F3 strength
Seems to be a High End EF4 based on damage. You usually need 2 EF5 indicators to prove the tornado could constantly produce that level of damage. Hence, the forbidden rating.
300MPH Holy crap
Pleeeeease......Reed Timmer got not only the same data but actual video from multiple ground angles and drone footage that follows the tornado that is WAAAY UP CLOSE! Sorry Wurman😢😢😢
I'm wondering why he's not sold rights or given permission to any news outlet to show his footage. You gotta be crazy to not want that footage aired on your network if you're covering that twister.
@@itsicandy dude, I watched it livestreamed for free on UA-cam. Then rewatched it, and shared it, on his UA-cam channel. He makes his money from the science he actually collects and sells to university or lectures about. Unlike Wurman who leaches off the taxpayer grants. Timmer did in one year what Wurman tried to do in over 10 years and millions of dollars...get ground level radar data of a tornado AND vertical radar data from inside the tornado.
@@itsicandy Because Reed Timmer is not a sell-out to the misinformed media.
Not only he makes more money doing what he does now, but he doesn't have the many executives, media advertisements, and the media hosts and anchors jumping up and down his throat.
That’s an ef5 whoever rated that is dead wrong.
Suggest that only one tornado with winds of 300 mph occur every between eight and fifteen years.
That tornado went over our house but it was forming must have waited till up at greenfield to drop down as it was forming near corydon Iowa the winds were so strong even without it touching down
Strongest tornado (recorded officially) since the 1999 Moore tornado.
And yet the April 27 2011 EF5s were clearly stronger than both of these, despite no official recording and a laughable estimated max wind speed of 210 mph.
@@Trahzy 210 mph is EF4, and EF5 is 260 mph.
@@MaximumFainstein Uh, no lol.
@@Trahzy oh yes it is based on original wind speed, the EF scale is based on damage.
@@Trahzy In fact the Hackleburg, AL and Smithvile, MS tornadoes are too weak, because they were not observed by mobile radar.
300 M.P.H. that's a Big #
💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💔
The miracles of geoengineering 😂
EF 4 ?? But it had 300 mph winds ! Wouldn’t that make it an ef5 ? 🤷🏽
the EF scale estimates the ground wind speeds by observing damage any twister leaves behind. It may have had wind speeds in excess of 300 miles per hour, but the damage it left behind was able to confirm the tornado had wind speeds of at least 185 miles per hour, earning it an EF4 rating.
You can't have a tornado be rated Ef5 without the damage to confirm it.
@@Animus-255 It just couldn't physically cause Ef5 damage, but the winds were most likely at Ef5 strength.
160 feet in the air, not on the ground. The proof is the damage, look at damage from tornadoes that had 250+ on the ground. This was 185 max.
All the solar panels and windmills are making the weather worse 😅
How?
@@kimmccarthy7747 They certainly aren’t making things better,as promised
HAARP
1:01 🎉
so where's the capture, i didnt see any capture
"Reed Timmer" on UA-cam has incredible footage of this tornado
@@thejman3489 yeah well this video should change its title then because there is not such capture
300+ mph winds, and it's only an EF-4? I don't think so. You might want to rethink this one.
The 300+ mph winds weren't on the ground though. Proof is in the damage.
Yeap 300 mph winds can be rated lower than EF5.
Victorian Police officers should be going inside this tornado.
That is unfortunate. :/
I pray they rebuild
Umm, ef4? Do they not know thier own scales? 300+ mph is ef5, and probably the strongest or close to it in the world....and they say ef4...omg, how d can you be.
The EF scale factors in wind speed as well as based on the severity of the damage tornadoes cause.
@@michaelstrahan2.0 according to the fujita scale, any tornado with winds exceeding 200 mph is a ef(5) had to put quotations around that so your da can see. And you can look that shyt up too..its easy, we have internet....dont reply back. I dont like ignorant people talking to me.
@@legopotter8295 The Fujita scale and Enhanced Fujita scale is a DAMAGE scale, not a wind scale. The tornado did not produce EF5 damage.
@@legopotter8295 The Fujita scale isn't used anymore, the Ef scale uses damage to estimate tornado windspeed.
@@legopotter8295 ef scale is rated with damage…
There should be more emphasis on the fact this was measured by radar and not by calculating eg. the force to break a foot of concrete and 2 pieces of rebar. Also I do wonder if they figured in the trench it dug by the windmills. That's a lot of dirt to move.
Grad students with new radar acting like this was piedmont or bridge creek. Sorry for the victims regardless.
Mr. Tornado is very hungry. Read a book
THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN NAUGHTY TO ME
Reed Timmer is light years ahead of these propagandists.
les informations mr prisedant
These storms are real, they produce real damage and cause real fatalities & injuries.....and yet many will flock to the theater to be 'entertained by twister movies' SMH. Why?
Because the movies aren't real?
Nah but ofc they gave it EF-4 with 185 mph winds cuz nothing was actually capable of showing any EF-5 damage indicators, also the 300 mph winds were further up in the tornado instead of on the ground therefore it can't be that powerful
How much further up? Like what? 100 feet? 100 feet isn't much
@@alexcarter2461 true, honestly idk, could've been 300 feet
@kirby456 The only caveat is it had a forward velocity of 70kms an hour. Pretty fast moving for a tornado that size, had it traveled at a traditionally expected speed the damage would've been way more severe.
natural disasters are happening in every country with higher frequencies 😞
Mother Africa is Very mad 💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨
That scientist resembles Helen Hunt!
Voice of God you guys need to film yourself and take more footage and make a miniseries or something at least document it and get paid bigger bucks for the danger you're in
It’s not always about the size, it’s about strength. and what gets to annoy me is how they always focus on damages then wind speeds so I’m rating that a F5 for sure.
TWISTER 👀
?
This devastating news will create lot of opportunities for research construction police media hospitality jobs.
Minimise of production in 2025 all countries are if decided this years minimise next year's production if nature's desparation behaviours as or its increases as summer is for example
One of the videos about this tornado looked exceptional, seeing close-ups and aerial views, and the color had a deep tone. I thought it was the best tornado video I've seen, until I saw a comment wondering how a drone could operate next to a tornado.
I didn't hear anything about or drone or see any drone footage, so...?
@@vintagelady1 This was the drone footage, courtesy of storm chaser Reed Timmer ua-cam.com/video/o_kms2m5V-Q/v-deo.html
That footage wasn't fake, it was real. I think the drone was just far enough not to be sucked into the tornado
Thinking it’s fake is just stupid. Reed timmer was driving next to it and a drone was in the sky. You could clearly see the same tornado being filmed and the drone was far enough from the tornado to not be thrown around.
We need an EF6 on the scale.
Why? This isn't the first 300 mph tornado. And this one didn't even have 300 mph on the ground.
that was a ef6 tornado
Hypothetically impossible!
on the original scale it went up to F12 they actually recorded 318mph winds for the greensfiled tornado technically making it the worlds first f6 on the original scale so it’s actually possible
No such thing
EF6 tornadoes do not exist.
300 mile pre wind for a tornado would make new level ef6
😂🫢🤣♟️✌️
❤
We've been studying these things for 80 years. You would think we'd have them figured out by now.
We did figure them out they are tornadoes
What do you propose we do?
You know the amount of knowledge has been gained? The more we predict the worse the general public gets! You think scientists are negligent?
@@keetguyForecasts are 90% accurate 48 hours out. Predictions for a zoned in area are very specific and accurate. You are worse than the Dunning Kruger Effect.
You can't imagine the knowledge gained over the past several decades. Just making excuses for your ignorance.
📖📜💭
Looks like GAZA
Thank yo green team for helping to create storms ravaging the world. You guys rule.
COME OUT JESUS AND FACE YOUR "PEOPLE" THAT I CREATED IN THY FLESH
Lol, that tornado reading technology was old when the movie twister came out, that was a loooong time ago, the6 have learned zero since the first movie, they just keep repeating how their "instruments" read wind speed...that's all...nothing new learned in decades...
Just stop making sin
Horrible. Direct that tornader to Washington D.C?
🙏🏽🙌🏽👏🏽
The tribulation is coming....give your heart ❤️ to Jesus...though the earth be removed and the mountains carried into the midst of the sea... there is a place of peace through The Savior. If you confess with your mouth and believe that He is Lord , you will be saved. Jesus, the name above all other names.
Why does god hate religious types? The really bad natural disasters, floods, pestilence seem to happen in religious areas.
We don’t believe In that stuff round these parts mista take it some where else thank ya kindly
Duh we know it was very fast and very strong.
lol what's your point?
@@bormz7191"duh" of course 😂😂
People like me who geek out over tornado stats get off on this. You don’t get it, it’s ok.
It's to bad none of these people were warned that they were living in what the rest of the world calls "Tornado Alley".
Try to be less stupid.
Many people do not have the means to move.
And they still build their homes with wooden lolipop sticks and plasterboard.
@@AlfieDoug that’s mostly because it might get destroyed in the near future again. Just keeping the cost low.
Ef1 levels tbh. Childs play.
Where did Allah's punishment and destruction come from? It is arrogance and aggression. Look at what you are doing in Gazza. Many of those before you were destroyed by Allah. but you dont know
Right! 300 MPH! Relax... none of this $hit is True!
Must stay in denial so to never take responsibility
Mocking victims! You are a coward
It actually is true, Search up “Bridge Creek - Moore tornado 1999” This is another tornado on that level.
Keep living in your own world. It’ll be better for the rest of us.
@@PhilipWe Uncle Amos said he read your posts...and said he must get back to his Naked Yoga Class.
Trump is on his way with paper towels
Just can’t get him off your mind can you? Poor thing…
@@dsz2448 at least tRump lost the election
@@Michael_Beanflip This comment didn't age well!
Agenda 21
?
Hawww😂 it’s already 2024 🤷🏼
@@andrew30m United Nations agenda for the 21st century.
This kind of disaster was caused by Evangelical.
H.A.A.R.P.
Just nature
BS excuse. When is it and when is it not and how can you tell the difference?
@@philmabarak5421 H.A.A.R.P. & cloudseeding is used daily in all countries
Weather has not been natural since world war 1
There probably isn’t a conspiracy theory you don’t believe, chemtrails, plandemic, HAARP, flat earth
@@volcanicforming The most Bs thing I have ever heard. Why would the government hurt it's self.
Hollywood? Okay... Relax... none of this $hit is True!
U ready for fun? okay...Relax... none of this $hit is True!
weathermodification24/7
Free palestine❤
This is the tornado that hit my town, PEOPLE DIED AND YOUR OUT HERE WITH YOUR FREE PALESTINE?! pathetic get your priorities straight in life, do something useful
🏳️🌈SIN CONSEQUENCES 🏳️🌈
ROMANS CHAPTER 1 VERSES 25/32.
↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️
ISAIAH CHAPTER 24.⏱️👈
JOHN 3:16👈
2 PETER CHAPTER 3⏱️👈
GALATIANS CHAPTER 6 VERSE 7.👈
Do you know who the Romans were? What you're talking about happened over two thousand years ago on the other side of the ocean. Why do you think it applies to you? The prophecies happened already, and the Latin language is considered to be a dead language. Wow, the people who crucified Jesus of Nazareth, and you think it's about you.
Why does the reporter look like Jennifer Connelly
PRAYER'S,... BLESSINGS,.. AND CONDOLENCES TO EVERYONE WHO HAS BEEN AFFECTED BY THIS DEVASTATION. 🌹🫂😢💕🙏
Let’s just hope this is a one time thing. Though I did see a documentary that explained how tornados maybe getting stronger and moving more towards the north from the observed shifting of the jet stream and a few other stuff.
Which may or may not have been caused by climate changes. 🫠
Have you heard of Canadian winters? Here's a video taken along Lake Erie the day before Christmas last year. If you go to the end of the point on the left you can see Buffalo across the lake. You can see there is no snow, no ice, no wind and I'm riding a bicycle without a winter coat. 34 seconds. ua-cam.com/video/-_Lert0qjhk/v-deo.html
Unfortunately this is not a one time thing. Tornadoes will definitely hit and destroy another city in the future.
This is the 3rd one to be recorded 300 though.
🙏🎯🌍🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
The world 🌍 has changed
**Nam myoho rengekyo**
🙏 Pray 🌍 peace 🕊️ be safe
_______//
X2 Thai**
⚠️Sh._sa//
I live about an hour away from that community. The thing that amazed me when I first saw the video was how it turned everything it touched into confetti. No big chunks. Everything was ground down. It was amazing. Lived in tornado Alley all my life but if these little tornadoes can do that kind of damage. I don't know if hiding in the basement is going to be enough.