For the topic of FIFA, is not that the world tell us that the World Cup is for men, very disappointed on Kah Mun answered on this.. there was a video where BBK recently interview the two champion from Women Global Esports Games, the champion said that the women are biologically not competitive or even interested to competitive sport. There is more factor to support this, firstly men is realistically biologically stronger to women.. We did not build the gender inequality from beginning, it is in our hormones. Take for example, Women athletes are known to be less strong and powerful than equally trained men. What this means? Does it means that women's sport are more less attractive or boring to people? Technically yes but not really, see the cases of Battle of the Sexes where Serena Williams Lost to 203rd-Ranked Man in Tennis... but why Serena Williams has more viewership compare to men tennis? Because in this age, we have taken gender to priority instead of factually admiring and recognizing the skill of a person. But still is women's sport that bad compare to men? No... look at Gymnastics, dancing, ballet or more... why women are dominated in these sports rather than men? Factually looking at the fact that these sports require flexibility, body awareness, balance or even Aesthetic Appeal which women are much more better than men! In the end, the gender inequality is more about us men more than women, don't try to compare men's sport to women's sport or the other way. It is just not fair plus people might take my comment as sexism but seriously I'm the entirely of opposite of that, as my background I have a single mom who take care of the family financially, and the keeping the house stable independently, she like the definition of true feminism. On the other hand, i have my useless dad where he never contribute to the family and gamble all the money away. But let's get the fact right, go to a construction site and u know what i mean, not all women is like my mom, independent, strong, hardworking and smart. And not all men is like my father where pretty much not doing anything for the family, irresponsible. But the number is always right no matter what in the future or past, the number will always be more strong men than strong women, vice versa, there will be more irresponsible men than irresponsible women. So gender has always been equal, it's more depend on a person, no matter what gender. This is a man's world, But it will be nothing without a woman or a girl.
Well said. Another strong point, which is sad to hear but that’s reality. For example, like football or basketball tournaments, men always get paid more, more views, more sponsor. Becoz they’re really just better. They get that much pay becoz they got many supports, many eyeballs. NBA is an example. Besides, WNBA always got support from NBA SUPERSTARS, but WNBA still didn’t get as much eyeballs from others, no views mean not much money earn, which also means that they couldn’t get the salary like the NBA players. The amount of female and male are more or less equal what, women could have just support WNBA and boycott NBA so the gender equality can be achieved. But sadly, the reality isn’t work that way. That’s just cruel, sad and real factual. The world is not fair since it exist, if not there wouldn’t be thousands or millions of men in past thousands years died for helping the emperor of the era to build the China Great Wall or the Pyramid in Egypt. Humans body isn’t equal as well, we designed to be unequal, left lung is just smaller than right lung. Many and many, there is also many inequality to men. I agree smth should be fight by them to get a better circumstances for them, but definitely not asking too much equality.
I think you still didn't get the point she wish to brings out. What she meant is, the world always focus on the men. So whenever you mention about World Cup, you will only think about the man's world cup and didn't relate on the female ones. Other example is when we mention about police we will relate to man and nurse to woman. This is call stereotype. And this is the message she tries to brings out has nothing to do with how your personal family experience.
@@ievonntey3700always focus on men? This person literally just make a point about the Serena Williams situation and what you just gonna past through that? Are you sure you’re understand his statement as well?
@@YZZ505 bro. The example is not about sports. Nor is it about strength blablabla. It's about stereotypes. We should never relate any sports/career/role to any gender. Eg. Man can be nurses, female can be police, man can be full time househusband and woman can be the provider. Her question was simple, did USA won World Cup. The host answered it wrong and hence showed that the first thing host relates the World Cup to is the male World Cup. So what US male team was stronger than their female team? Does that make it lesser for the female team as a football player? That's the whole point. Some male has better flexibility than some females and some females are stronger than some male. And this is why we don't want to have any stereotypes so that everyone won't be judged in doing everything they like.
@@ievonntey3700 I am all for equality for opportunity. But to be fair, the example of FIFA World Cup is a very bad example imho. Because the FIFA World Cup is for the men's team, while the counterpartfor the women's team is called the FIFA Women's World Cup. I will also answer the same if she asked me the question of "Has the USA ever won the World Cup?" but if she asked me whether the USA won a FIFA Women's World Cup, then I would say yes. I am not denying that this world was built upon the patriarchy concept generally, yes it is, and we have to look for ways to tackle this issue and bring upon the equality of opportunity. I am just trying to point out the flaw of this particular example 😂.
As a graduate engineer, my first interview (in a SME) specially mentioned about why they have considered to hire me (female) where I will deal with people mostly is male. That is such a weird statement for them to mention where when something has become a norm people don’t usually raise it out in a proud manner. Another incident that happened before is the internship company (MNC) that I attended hired a female (me) and male (actually my course mate) at the same time. My course mate told me that during the interview they actually requested him to travel to sites from time to time where they never mention this to me (we both actually shared job scopes). I genuinely don’t know is this really a problem but it indeed made me felt uneasy. Btw, thanks wabikong for such meaningful video. I really love CIA series and this is actually my first UA-cam comment on Msia originated channel. Keep on going! xx
I actually beg to differ. At least for the tech industry. Maybe its true for the case of SMEs. But for MNCs, its actually common that female resumes get pushed to the top of the stack and get interviews easily. And if it boils down to two choice (male or female) with two similar qualifications and experience, the female would definitely get it. This is probably to push diversity hires and try to balance the male-female ratios. There's actually huge incentives on being a female in tech during schooling and working days. You'll have exclusive women in tech events, special bursaries/scholarship just for women (there are actually many including govt /company/university sponsered ones) while being applicable to every other open scholarships/bursaries. You do not even need to like programming or scripting to be a working as a female in tech. Something I've personally seen, might not apply to be true with an anecdotal score of 7 females I know in school. 5 of them went on to do non technical work (Product managers, Sales manager etc in tech companies), 1 switched to UI/UX and the last is doing technical work (devops). You obviously don't see these opportunities for males in other female-dominated jobs. Males in HR, Marketing, education, healthcare don't have these special men minority opportunities that tries to balance the ratios. In fact, here's a paradox that's supported by statistics. The more gender equality a country has, the lower rate of woman in STEM fields. In oppressed countries where gender equality isnt that good (Iran/Saudi Arabia), STEM courses are actually dominated by females. I suspect its due to the perception that STEM allows them to be in a better position financially? But in a country where you give freedom of choice, expression and to be whatever you or can want, most females tend to not choose STEM.
i think not everything can be gender equlity like what jiawen said the football competition, nobody actually knows american female national team won world cup 2 times. But for this issue, jiawen should question why nobody knows instead of just directly point this is designed for man. From the aspect of physically, man is more competitive in this sport which means it more entertained to watch. When a lot of people find it is more interesting to watch man football match instead of woman, then a lot of financial players will more willing to sponsor more to man competitions or leagues because this can gain public attention and eventually bring benefits to them. Gender equality environment is not for every sport, but some surely able to do it like e-sport, chess etc. For woman only coaches, i really like this idea but should consider decrease the number of coaches because most of the time the woman only coaches wouldnt pack. I myself use mrt almost everyday, peak hour is not joke, the whole coaches is very pack except woman only coaches. This leads to a very weird scene or phenomena where all the men pack like a sardine can and when you see the woman only coaches, its not even filled up and left many empty spaces. Im not against this idea and i also feel that its necessary to have woman only coaches, but is it necessary to have that much of woman only coaches where most of time it just half empty?
That’s the point, why men football is more well known is because it is more entertaining to watch, why the hell everything similar to this have to link to gender equality? Is this the reason why women’s football is not well known? This is not a rational discussion, is clearly throwing bullshit
@@d8y8220she’s just using 1 example of how capitalism is shaping the society. Like how sports is for men, modelling is for women, STEM is for men, nursing is for women. Though it’s true that it’s created based on strengths of genders, but the unwanted effects is the negative bias against the other gender. Like “all” men are less emotional, less caring, women are less serious and less professional.
Agreed with the points that not all sports should goes into the discussion of gender equality. In today sports, both male and female sports are competitive and entertaining. The only thing difference is the audience acceptance and response, whereby this is their rights to choose their preferences for sports. Same goes to the huge gap differences in game ticket or winning prize of different sports like badminton vs tennis. Hence, the lesser attention given to female sports are due to society preferences and lesser financial players are interested to invest to the market. This issue reflects on the pay of the male vs female players as well.
The concept of fostering equality of opportunity is undeniably commendable, as it strives to ensure that every individual, regardless of background or circumstance, has an equitable chance to pursue their aspirations and fulfill their potential. However, advocating for equality of outcome raises valid concerns, as it entails an impractical and potentially detrimental endeavor, undermining merit-based incentives that drive productivity and progress in society.
@@Hirotara Bro, I suggest you to look up the two terms "equality of opportunity" and "equality of outcome". People can claim they support gender equality but which kind of equality? You seem to mock this bro above, but your TLDR for him fail to reflect even a cent of what he said
@@Hirotara Lots of people have the misconception view on feminist movement. Feminism is a spectrum that there is no single set of characteristics to define it. At one end, could be extreme (Misandry) while at the other end (traditional roles). Most women are in the middle ground but conflicted by the unconscious education and cultural influence of the current patriarchy societies. Same as men rights groups, which is a spectrum. Some can go to the extreme right (Incels, Misogyny) while the other end. Most of them are in the middle. The confusion still lies in the privilege status in the patriarchy societies, which leads to lots of blind-spots and unwilling to surrender the benefits of being privileged. If all the people have the equality mindset, the society will be different than what we experience, although we can only imagine how will be, but unable to really know how it is.
What aunty said the wage paid to men is higher than women that isn’t true. The wage is calculated based on how much profit you can bring to a firm and of course, your capabilities to work for your employer
@TJ chun 如果您说女性没有去争蓝领的位置。其实是有但马来西亚所有的雇主都不请女性。如果您去看各大华文报纸及各大网站招聘都写着：送货员，男性。园艺工人，男性。像我们是个女性，想要当园艺工人时就看到招聘广告只请男性，也是很😡。当您去看Rapid巴士其实有很多女性司机，当您去看Grab,Lalamove的Rider其实也有很多女性啊！。
首先明白什么是gender equality vs feminism。平安年代，唱说男女平等，女性车厢，ladies day / night；不用到战争年代已经歌唱女性小孩优先逃离，男的保卫国家，天天说男要gentleman，累活苦劳扛东西男性包办，不要小气计较。Gender equality 不是buffet，只拿你喜欢的。不然是feminism priorities。
Exactly her point. It’s World Cup and women’s World Cup, NBA and WNBA. Why not MNBA, or Men’s World Cup. Like tennis, there’s no Grand slam and Women’s grand slam, it’s just grand slam. Or MMA, or even olympics.
@@jiawei0917 The sport with true gender equality is men's sport because there's no gender requirements and people is looking for the best sport person regardless of genders, that's why it's just world cup not men world cup. The truth is in reality there won't be equal between men and women. That's why people create a women category specifically only for women so that women can have opportunities to participate in the sport.
@@jiawei0917 lol i thought there is already WNBA just woman themself also don't wanna watch it that why it's not valued as the NBA? so you wan sponsor to invest a low roi league just because it's gender equality ??? so how about miss world situation with Mr world? at the end it still depend on which have the higher viewer and roi return. If you expected a mix league do you think it's a fair fight for women? this topic doesn't even should consider as a gender equality topic at all
这个说到底还是在说女权.....there isn't any gender equality in discussion The main plot was discussed about how women was neglected in society Yet they seems to forget, the bleed is also on mens side I mean 还没结婚的我不知道啦，结婚的，我问一下男生到底吐了多少身家出来cover?真的能很equal ？ 既然大家撕开了说，我们也不想一定要因为男生所以约会一定我们要给钱，但是真的可以做到平等？这个社会有真正意义上看到我们的苦？？ 平等讲是很容易啊，但撕开来说，我们何时平等过？连教育平等都不可能为前题的我们 ....真的经得起撕开来说？
I would say dowries are discussable with the partners' family, I think it's pretty much just a "意思" rather than an obligation nowadays. Hmm...maybe it's more about finding a partner who does have similar ideals with you? Like for paying meals, I think it's pretty common among English-educated Chinese to spilt the bills. Maybe it has a relation to Western exposure?
Wow, Msia’s first gender topic! Glad that we are still pretty enlightened about this matter. The west is collapsing over this unimportant matter. Nevertheless, men and women are never equal. The faster we accept this fact, the faster our society can move on PS: The Indonesian girl has fallen into the trap of feminism unfortunately, thinking that men & women are equal
Hmm... calling gender equality an "unimportant matter" Have you considered how important/beneficial gender equality is to both sides? If men does not need to be the sole breadwinner of the family, women can help with the financial burden of the family while men can also help with the burden of household chores, including child rearing. This is just a very very basic thing that is asked of. I personally think gender equality is more about trying to gain a better life for all men and women, I don't think it necessarily means to get the "exact same rights". But as how there are many facets to all things, there will be those who are on "the extremes". Some just want basic fair rights, while there are also those with ideas we find it hard to agree with.
@@OdyLoveMusic I appreciate your argument. Totally do. Much better than what most western feminist would put forth their logic on the matter. I understand where you're coming from where both male and female help each other with their biological defined roles in a nuclear family. Totally understand that standpoint. However, men and women are never equal. And the more we expect the other gender to perform what was not primarily their biological role, the more we fall into the trap of gender equality or feminism. Males are born to be hunters and to provide for the family while females are born to nurture and take care of the family from within. To put it simply, males are suppose to earn and make a living for the family and females are to nurture and grow the family Fastforward to 2024, we are now in a position that our roles in a family have been so blurred, that we are now even arguing about stuff like "what is a man" or "what is a woman". It's just pretty sad
The sources of inequality in our nation stem from extremist politicians, the influence of "Asian" culture and traditions, and the presence of Islamic Syaria Law. A potential avenue for addressing this issue could involve reconsidering the adherence to Syaria Law and adopting a more secular approach, fostering a more inclusive and equitable society.
@@dango529 这位男士你好，虽然你这整篇回复充满了各种语病和逻辑错误，看得我很不爽（不好意思职业病发作），但我还是认真读完了，以下是我分三次给你的回复。：） 你说女权的目的从名字中就预示了它的终点，虽然不知道你是怎么看得到它的“终点”的，但我觉得你对女权主义好像有很多的误解。女权主义不仅仅是为了女性，而是为了所有性别的平等。虽然名字中包含“女”，但它的核心是反对任何形式的性别歧视，无论针对男性还是女性。其终极目标是消除性别不公，建立一个更加平等和公正的社会。将女权主义视为仅仅是为女性争取权利而忽略其对整体性别平等的贡献，是对其本质的片面理解。 关于历史和社会因素的讨论，你认为这些因素不应被列入考量，因为男性在历史上通过战争等方式争取到了当前的社会地位。但你好像不知道这种观点直接忽略了历史和社会结构对性别角色的影响。历史上的性别角色分工并不是自然而然的结果，而是受各种社会、经济和文化因素的影响。现代社会应该反思和纠正这些历史不公，而不是继续沿用这些偏见来合理化当前的性别不平等。历史上，女性被排除在许多领域之外，正是因为这些排除，才导致了今天的性别不平等。承认和修正这些历史因素是实现真正平等的重要一步，这才是我们说的女权和性别平权。 你提到两性在职场、体育等领域有本质区别，我也不否认，但前提是我们需要明确女权运动的核心目标是什么。女权并不是要求男女在每个方面都做到完全一样，而是要在各自的特点和优势的基础上，争取平等的机会和资源。体能上的差异并不是女权的关注点，请你搞清楚一点，两性平权强调的是机会的平等，而不是能力的同等.比如在工作场所中，女权倡导的是女性应当在招聘、晋升、薪酬等方面享有与男性同等的机会，而不是要求女性必须在体力劳动上与男性竞争, This is so basic bro但显然你并不清楚。同样在体育领域，女权倡导的是对女性运动员的支持和宣传，应当与男性运动员相当，而不是因为观赏性不同就给予不同的资源分配。
不大认同World Cup default setting 的观点， 在Sport上面说到Gymnastic, by norms 都会认为是女生居多的运动。说到world design default setting, 这个是基于产品或服务的话题，生产商也肯定会选择利益最大化和最合适的方式去设计产品。For example 市场上几乎不会看到有男性美甲这个商业赛道吧。
嘉文的point 完全和女性没关系。可悲 1，没人知道女生world cup 是market 的问题，不是女性的问题。（打个比喻吧，你们知道的男onlyfans 赚会比女生onlyfans 多吗） 2，piano key 发明家是 Cristofori, 男生，当然他自己设计的东西 是适合他自己（男生）。 3，在职场上，没有女上司吗？没有女老板吗？为什么当女性在上班遇上问题就觉得是女性问题呢？而真的不是能力上的问题？ 4，男生遇到的 性侵犯，家暴 少 的原因是男生多数默默承受，是statistically 少,而不是真的比女性少，告上女生家暴成功有几个？可悲是当男生遇到 性侵犯或者家暴都默默承受原因是因为人们多数会取笑而不是 支持。 5，你真的不可以吧你自己的遭遇 就以为是每个人都是这样，你家人有问题，不并代表每个家庭是那么有问题。我妈妈做家庭主妇很开心，爸爸也很负责任，各有各的责任都做得很好，而没有分你我该做什么。 6，你的知识认知的确 不般配做主播的，多数男生也是来看你的腿，你应该也知道，比如你开始会打扮你也知道这个是advantage，毕竟如果你今天再丑一点应该是没有观众的，说以平等一路来不在于男女，而这世界几乎不存在 完美相待的公平。 7. 我不是觉得对女生公平不重要，but dont put individual problams as world wide matters. the world was never fair and never will be. please look at the worst and poor country , try to explain to them you want to have equality in all spectrum. 有什么想要fight back 的观点欢迎comment。我不介意帮你摆回现实。
是个很好的争论题，for me 我是觉得马来西亚还好算是公平，有些比较极端的那些是个人主义以及某某影响照成的，XX比较恐怖点马来西亚真的算很好了，但有些事是的确对女生不公平那女权主义者出来棒说那是对的事情，但有些没意义的事情那都要拿出来说就不大对，我觉得男权女权都好，先看事情再发声才是对的做法而不是什么事情not make sence都要出声那就真的有点XX，没有绝对的对和错
still waiting for Ceddy and Vicky Anime Crossover in Wabikong, it can be Wabikong's multiverse haha , also just a suggestion, what if interview Ceddy & Kah Mun together, would that spark more interesting topic :P
kah mun very logical & smart one. her ability to explain her view clearly with evidences is excellent. I support kah mun and feminism also. women's rights still have a lot of space to develop, gender inequality still exists, men are overestimated overall. in almost every country, the populations of both female/male are quite the same, however the parliment members are mostly men in so many nations including malaysia. women's voices and women's rights must be acknowledged better
Which evidences was clear and excellent ? And why men are overestimate ? When you said that, isn’t that you’re strongly look down on men hard earn achievement instead ? Which part of inequality between men and women in this modern days ? And women is able to join the Parlimen but why was it less ? Why women never go try ? Purely just curious bout your unexplain statement t
If women can give enough capabilities focus in political mind rational working in physics practical subjects in long-term, they can take over the handle to make decisions for citizens and families.. If You're emotion biased person, tend to attractive on emotion subjects... don't ruined the world with Your narrative.. Responsibilities not a funniest games things, don't kill people with Your blind eye..
Did u think that woman right or patriarchy exist? In the monetary system, a lot of thing is unfair. We got low income group, middle income and top income. All this is unequally society. We never achieve equality for both. The right comes from wrong, is within the system of morality. To me, achieving equally if we all have basic needs, no poverty..
其实在大马社会，女权主义这个东西是被扭曲的。
我很常会听到，女生要有自己的权力。 同一时间里，也是她们每天口里挂着“你是男生，你付钱是应该的，你是男生，你应该做的” 这不叫女权主义，这叫take for granted. 打着女权的借口来利用人。
你有能力你也可以做像男人做的事，这才叫男女平等。 如果你每天说女人有能力，却一直说这不是女人该做的。你只是合理化这社会，女人是弱式群体。就像古代，的想法没什么差别
@@deep_extremes4686 都被烂用
非常认同
不懂为什么wabikong要找这种人来合作
最恶心就是这种"女权自助餐" a.k.a "feminist buffet"
只选择利己的女权
我敢說，大多數女生看到你的comment 多數是滑走，因為說出她們的心聲😂
嘉雯真的是馬來西亞UA-cam界的寶藏，她的論點很強，也可以扭轉或引導主持人的想法，而且兼具娛樂性。
我支持女權，但蠻抗拒現代激進扭曲式的女權份子，這種女權份子往往從弱勢變成霸凌。
嘉雯，我就覺得平衡得很好，也非常接近我的想法。女權不應該是和男性對立，也不應該流於形式的表面，應該要真心認為男女是平等的，這關係才會慢慢平衡。
简称极端的叫厌男
但有时最反女权的往往是女的
@@heyooyooheyyyoyo 英文名叫Karen
@@heyooyooheyyyoyo 比比皆是，Johnny Depp當時在Me Too時期被風向直接定罪，最後Amber謊言被揭穿，男生才得到清白。
真正的女權本來就是提倡男女平等，它並不是要拉低男生，而是說男生有的權利女生也有。
我是一位中年阿姨，我越来越喜欢看年轻人做的影片，喜欢听年轻人说的观念，觉得你们真的太棒了，很有自己的想法，赞！想不到影片里的AUNTY 那么的开放思想，少见。
不管是男性或者是女性都會性別歧視，這影片都是探討女性多一点，男性其实也很可怜一下，比如：被性骚扰/侵犯上新闻，comment 都是笑男生noob,react 😂,而女性上新聞下面都是😡幹施害者，男性的就是笑受害者
如果男生做不到“社会”以为男生肯定做得到的东西也是会被笑，我不是patriarchy，我纯粹是觉得男女平等很重要，社会不止要关心女性也要关心男性，peace😊
Tealive please sponsor wabikong @hao8158
其实你说得很对，这也是feminist在说着的东西。然后你一点都不男权，因为就是因为在男权主义下，才会有对各性别的stereotype 而如果男性不符合，其实受到的歧视比女性更多
对的，因为这个男权主义主导的社会总在各种方面地把男性设定为、认为是上位者，女性为下位者，一有男性处在下位或者喜欢做“被tag为下位者（女生）的事情“（eg.被性骚扰，哭泣，喜欢粉色，喜欢化妆, etc），这个主义下挺多男性就觉得自己这个群体面子名誉(?)被侮辱或者害怕自己被拉下水变成下为者又或者是踩低这些他们觉得比自己下位的男性来彰显自己多么”男子气（上位者）“， 都是feminist在讨论的议题（至于为什么倡导男女平等但又是叫feminist欢迎各位可以去google更多了解下feminist哦）
@@qq-ec2sk 因为如果没有feminist，现在女性还没有投票权，还只能拿着与男性一半的薪资。而且女权一直主张性别平权，而大男子主义则是一切性别不平等的根源。
@@ievonntey3700 那么所以现在不需要了呀。有一样的新资，一样有投票权了
must raise editor's pay, makes everything so much beytter and funnier
For the topic of FIFA, is not that the world tell us that the World Cup is for men, very disappointed on Kah Mun answered on this.. there was a video where BBK recently interview the two champion from Women Global Esports Games, the champion said that the women are biologically not competitive or even interested to competitive sport. There is more factor to support this, firstly men is realistically biologically stronger to women.. We did not build the gender inequality from beginning, it is in our hormones. Take for example, Women athletes are known to be less strong and powerful than equally trained men. What this means? Does it means that women's sport are more less attractive or boring to people? Technically yes but not really, see the cases of Battle of the Sexes where Serena Williams Lost to 203rd-Ranked Man in Tennis... but why Serena Williams has more viewership compare to men tennis? Because in this age, we have taken gender to priority instead of factually admiring and recognizing the skill of a person. But still is women's sport that bad compare to men? No... look at Gymnastics, dancing, ballet or more... why women are dominated in these sports rather than men? Factually looking at the fact that these sports require flexibility, body awareness, balance or even Aesthetic Appeal which women are much more better than men! In the end, the gender inequality is more about us men more than women, don't try to compare men's sport to women's sport or the other way. It is just not fair plus people might take my comment as sexism but seriously I'm the entirely of opposite of that, as my background I have a single mom who take care of the family financially, and the keeping the house stable independently, she like the definition of true feminism. On the other hand, i have my useless dad where he never contribute to the family and gamble all the money away. But let's get the fact right, go to a construction site and u know what i mean, not all women is like my mom, independent, strong, hardworking and smart. And not all men is like my father where pretty much not doing anything for the family, irresponsible. But the number is always right no matter what in the future or past, the number will always be more strong men than strong women, vice versa, there will be more irresponsible men than irresponsible women. So gender has always been equal, it's more depend on a person, no matter what gender. This is a man's world, But it will be nothing without a woman or a girl.
Well said. Another strong point, which is sad to hear but that’s reality. For example, like football or basketball tournaments, men always get paid more, more views, more sponsor. Becoz they’re really just better. They get that much pay becoz they got many supports, many eyeballs. NBA is an example. Besides, WNBA always got support from NBA SUPERSTARS, but WNBA still didn’t get as much eyeballs from others, no views mean not much money earn, which also means that they couldn’t get the salary like the NBA players. The amount of female and male are more or less equal what, women could have just support WNBA and boycott NBA so the gender equality can be achieved. But sadly, the reality isn’t work that way. That’s just cruel, sad and real factual. The world is not fair since it exist, if not there wouldn’t be thousands or millions of men in past thousands years died for helping the emperor of the era to build the China Great Wall or the Pyramid in Egypt. Humans body isn’t equal as well, we designed to be unequal, left lung is just smaller than right lung. Many and many, there is also many inequality to men. I agree smth should be fight by them to get a better circumstances for them, but definitely not asking too much equality.
I think you still didn't get the point she wish to brings out. What she meant is, the world always focus on the men. So whenever you mention about World Cup, you will only think about the man's world cup and didn't relate on the female ones. Other example is when we mention about police we will relate to man and nurse to woman. This is call stereotype. And this is the message she tries to brings out has nothing to do with how your personal family experience.
@@ievonntey3700always focus on men? This person literally just make a point about the Serena Williams situation and what you just gonna past through that? Are you sure you’re understand his statement as well?
@@YZZ505 bro. The example is not about sports. Nor is it about strength blablabla. It's about stereotypes. We should never relate any sports/career/role to any gender. Eg. Man can be nurses, female can be police, man can be full time househusband and woman can be the provider.
Her question was simple, did USA won World Cup. The host answered it wrong and hence showed that the first thing host relates the World Cup to is the male World Cup. So what US male team was stronger than their female team? Does that make it lesser for the female team as a football player? That's the whole point.
Some male has better flexibility than some females and some females are stronger than some male. And this is why we don't want to have any stereotypes so that everyone won't be judged in doing everything they like.
@@ievonntey3700 I am all for equality for opportunity.
But to be fair, the example of FIFA World Cup is a very bad example imho. Because the FIFA World Cup is for the men's team, while the counterpartfor the women's team is called the FIFA Women's World Cup. I will also answer the same if she asked me the question of "Has the USA ever won the World Cup?" but if she asked me whether the USA won a FIFA Women's World Cup, then I would say yes.
I am not denying that this world was built upon the patriarchy concept generally, yes it is, and we have to look for ways to tackle this issue and bring upon the equality of opportunity. I am just trying to point out the flaw of this particular example 😂.
男女平等，谈何容易。
人丑性骚扰，人帅新高潮，现在的女人都喜欢在上面的OK。
在亚洲
永远只有女方会要求男方暴富，
永远家里经济有问题就是怪男方。
夫妻一起出来工作，男方要负担家里
女方的钱自己花。
离婚后还要赡养费，男人的跟谁拿。
在马来，跟女方吃饭不帮她们买单就是不gentle。
在英国，每次出吃饭都是男人买单，这会让女人感觉是不是看不起女人。
两公婆都是AA
女人会，毕业后找人嫁了，想要老公给每个月有5千块可以消费，但男人不会。
应该要提倡的是平等而不是男权女权 因为一些事情发生时在男生女生之间也有不同结果 男生多数会被嘲笑 女生会被安慰 或者女生打着男生应该这样应该那样其实这就有点不平衡了 没有什么是应该只是男生愿意付出 或者在一段感情出现问题时女生说"我把青春付出给谁谁谁" 其实男生也付出了那段时间+金钱啊只是比较可惜，可能这段两个人理念不和分开呢不应该说成只有自己付出 情侣之间的节日通常男生付出的都会比女生多包括订餐厅，礼物，鲜花，转钱要"520"或"1314"之类的可能还有电影票爆米花等等 一些女生会觉得这些是应该的但一些女生会用眼睛看到男生爱她的付出 如果女生能看在眼里并感恩，男生基本不会要求回报礼物什么的因为是真心付出 但有些女生还会觉得礼物少或者一次要比一次好不然就代表没有之前爱 这样真的很扭曲
另外一种情况就是现在其实越来越多职业是女生优先了这样其实也不平衡啊 应该平等 也有很多比如女生看帅哥叫欣赏 男生也没有做什么只是normal看美女就被叫变态 不然就是某些事情有争执时一些女生会说"我是女生你就不能让着我吗" erm..... (这只是一些例子)
所以应该提倡"平等主意"不是说极力提倡女权不好，因为极端份子会把它利用成"女拳" 比如她们想要的东西就"女拳女拳女拳"如果情况对她们不利她们就"我是女生你琢磨要跟我计较"这对男生难道不是霸凌
malaysia 大多的女生思想很扭曲
一邊享受傳統社會的父權思想
一邊又享受男女平權
男生不以為意也要反省
哇，我一直在找你这说法，怎么没人留言的，我做第一个，那些女生看了只会忽略
我有留言不要女权自助餐/田园女权，但是应该在很下面了所以你没看到😂
不可否认的是无论男女都在传统父权思想的教育和环境长大，马来西亚在这方面也很落后（政策方面就已经很不friendly了，比如马来西亚女生和外国男生结婚孩子的国籍问题）,也是最近这些年才开始，直到现在也没什么人讨论这个话题，不可能一夜之间要大家从旧思想换去100%的男女平等的思维，尤其女性还是父权主义的下位者（没有说男生不是受害者的意思哈，但是女生generally 在旧思想的背景下牺牲太多），我们能做的是时刻反省自己有沒有无意识间享受思想交替的好处和意识到周围男女不平等的事情和为此发声❤
Btw要说的话，其实也有很多男生思想扭曲啊，一边享受传统父权思想一边又说现在是男女平等（eg. 约会甚至婚后生活费AA制，老婆出去工作回来还要做家务可是老公不愿意承担家务，生了孩子默认老婆照顾教育孩子男方不愿意照顾孩子等等的问题），森林大了什么样的人都有，我们更应该多讨论这些课题和发声
@@rest8657 姐姐，當我們討論一件事情，無論是直觀感受還是數據論述，說的是大部分，majority cases，如果硬扯全部個案，探討的意義何在
邏輯清晰，不要跳針
在古代或几十年前讨论 gender equality 就是为女权争取某些东西是合理的，不过，到了今天 2024，还在把 gender equality 和女权画上等号那本身就不是 gender equality 了，因为 gender 包括的是男和女，不能什么事情说到 gender equality 就是女性该享有什么特权还是女性应该争取什么；那男性呢？难道男性不是 gender 的一种？
我个人认为，现在不应该继续 gender equality 的口号了，反而是更全面的 Human rights - 人权，还有就是 mutual respect - 互相尊重；无论你是男，是女，还是变性，都应该得到一样的基本待遇和机会，都应该尊重每个性别的优势和劣势。现今社会，女性在经济能力上是比男性更有优势的，所以男主外，女主内这类传统思想需要被遗忘。而对于女性专属车型或停车场，这是对女性在体能上的劣势的一种尊重和理解，而不该被标为女权或 gender equality 的争取方向。
至于新通过的性骚扰条例，我相信这条例不会是争对女性的保护而已，应该也是适用于男性被性骚扰的情况的。
女性车厢是保护女性不被性骚扰，而男性车厢应该是保护男性不会被诬赖性骚扰，保护的原因不同不应该成为男性不需要被保护的理由
把男性当做是潜在的性骚扰犯罪分子本身就是个很大的问题
意想不到的collab 😍
真的意想不到！
我觉得大众对女权主义都有误解，以为女权主义要fight的是女性>男性。但是事实上，女权主义fight的其实是性别平权。很多女权主义学者的paper上都有提到男权主义下最被欺负的不是女性而是不符合男权主义标榜的男性。很欣慰很多评论都有提到男性也有不平等待遇的时候（产假etc），因为在你们的潜意识下，你们也是很在意性别平权的。所以就让我们一起支持性别平权，取代男权主义这个破旧的社会体系吧。
3:01 哦，问题的设置中的對比明顯指出他們對性别平等的概念有明显的误解...
@@theplaylistpsycho 就是咯，搞到很像是你支持男生还是女生的感觉😅
这正是混淆的部分，既然这些以女权自居的人主张的其实平权，为何要主张女权呢，倘若如此同样本意是平权的人却主张自己是男权的话，同样也很不对劲啊。
而且现代女权主义之所以会被贴上许多负面的标签，正是因为有许多女生是为了剥削男生而主张女权，口中说着女权等于平权，实际行动却是剥削男性的极端女权。
所以为了不混淆大家，也不让那些打着女权或男权头衔去剥削打压对方的行为，我建议我们应该纠正让一切实际上是主张equality的，就以平权自居，而不是女权或男权。
@@JeusAlprime108 其实这关系到另一个比较哲学的理念了，也就是平等和公平的区别 Equality vs Equity（去google image search一下平等和公平的区别， 你就会知道为什么这两个是不一样了哦），这就好比国家会更帮助弱势群体和贫困人士，而不是富人也享有和前者一样的津贴，男女这两个称长期以来的不平等，加上其实目前在还没达到男女相对平等的阶段来说，会更多的资源帮助被打压的女性但也同时主张男女平等为男性（男生被性骚扰，化妆）发声并不冲突，当然森林大了什么鸟都有，我们做好自己就好了
如果男女都遇到问题，不是性别问题，而是个人遭遇，所以根本不需要男女主义。是公平待遇。你遇到的问题不是每个女生遇到。而那些遇到的男生问题不是每个男生遇到。而你们需要女权问题的，是应该反思个人行为和素质。
嘉雯你的audience不只是男生ok？！我太喜欢嘉雯讲这些女性topic了！！
扭曲topic？
真的不想看到这些左胶把女性霸权带进马来西亚
没事，个人发表意见而已，抛开她是网红，就只是个普通的小妹妹而已。也不是什么博士，没什么好说的。她说的只是她的观点，根据她的发言你就知道女权的洗脑是多么成功了。
wabikong 都想挖角 kahmun😂 lucas 对kahmun 好点哦！她真的很棒，而且kahmun的女粉应该占多数啦！那些奇奇怪怪的uncle不算粉丝😅
感觉在Lucas那边kahmun可以学到更多主持或其他专业的东西，但在wbk这里反而更像是kahmun更能轻易就带领他们，所以kahmun还要收敛一下自己的主持引导的能力，因此还是在Lucas那边，kahmun比较能放开来谈，不怕旁边的主持被自己overshined的尴尬情况。
As a graduate engineer, my first interview (in a SME) specially mentioned about why they have considered to hire me (female) where I will deal with people mostly is male. That is such a weird statement for them to mention where when something has become a norm people don’t usually raise it out in a proud manner. Another incident that happened before is the internship company (MNC) that I attended hired a female (me) and male (actually my course mate) at the same time. My course mate told me that during the interview they actually requested him to travel to sites from time to time where they never mention this to me (we both actually shared job scopes). I genuinely don’t know is this really a problem but it indeed made me felt uneasy.
Btw, thanks wabikong for such meaningful video. I really love CIA series and this is actually my first UA-cam comment on Msia originated channel. Keep on going! xx
I actually beg to differ. At least for the tech industry. Maybe its true for the case of SMEs. But for MNCs, its actually common that female resumes get pushed to the top of the stack and get interviews easily. And if it boils down to two choice (male or female) with two similar qualifications and experience, the female would definitely get it. This is probably to push diversity hires and try to balance the male-female ratios.
There's actually huge incentives on being a female in tech during schooling and working days. You'll have exclusive women in tech events, special bursaries/scholarship just for women (there are actually many including govt /company/university sponsered ones) while being applicable to every other open scholarships/bursaries. You do not even need to like programming or scripting to be a working as a female in tech. Something I've personally seen, might not apply to be true with an anecdotal score of 7 females I know in school. 5 of them went on to do non technical work (Product managers, Sales manager etc in tech companies), 1 switched to UI/UX and the last is doing technical work (devops).
You obviously don't see these opportunities for males in other female-dominated jobs. Males in HR, Marketing, education, healthcare don't have these special men minority opportunities that tries to balance the ratios.
In fact, here's a paradox that's supported by statistics. The more gender equality a country has, the lower rate of woman in STEM fields. In oppressed countries where gender equality isnt that good (Iran/Saudi Arabia), STEM courses are actually dominated by females. I suspect its due to the perception that STEM allows them to be in a better position financially? But in a country where you give freedom of choice, expression and to be whatever you or can want, most females tend to not choose STEM.
越来越喜欢嘉文。有才，勇敢，尊重自己同时也尊重他人。太喜欢你了❤。
我是一个还未变性的变性人。我在马来这里因为文化的关系，我受了许多无人能比的歧视和压力。 让我来告诉你们怎么样的性别歧视。我应该算得上最有经验吧。
第一，但我的身份不被识破时候。。打扫工人，Guard都会很礼貌的称呼“boss”,”sir”,甚至有些女生也会生称”老板”。 一但身份被识破马上换了一个词，叫“kakak “, “miss”, 一些女的就叫“姐”。 我心想。。哇。。 原来女生地位这么微弱，这么被歧视的，让我打开眼界。（前提，当然我不是为了这些好处而想变性，我要解释因为我被这个文化给了我大大的误会而造成我极大的伤害，我的伤害来自“我被误会了”。）
我认为自己是与一般女生不同，是我从小就这样。我并不是一个有知识的人，当时我根本不懂什么是男权，女权主义。完全不懂男生和女生身份可以大有不同。也没有想过要拿什么好处，所以变性。基本我这类身份的人是最累最痛苦的，还有什么好处可以拿，有时可能会被认为和动物一样级别的人。信心微弱，更不用说向喜欢的人表白。好了，回到性别歧视。。
第二，我无端端被我的造型刻板印而被针对。拿一个例子，我想要上一个课程，然后在课程里有台湾人，马来西亚人，中国人，基本上哪里的男士非常排挤我（当时只有中国，台湾男士。也不是全部男士都这样）。我加他为好友因为我要交功课给那位导师，他拒绝加我。在课堂上，我主动聊天的时候，有个男生顶撞我，就意识到要告诉我我是没有权利说话的人。从此以后我就安静上课到结束。也不敢发问题。顺利毕业就好。而中国女生有时也会稍微说一些不尊重的话。我很无奈，在没办法之下，安静听课。
第三，我基本上已经和任何人失去连接，因为我感觉到自己并不受欢迎。只会让其他人辛苦。所有我选择抽离人群。然后自己过好自己的生活就好，自己逛逛街，自己吃吃东西这样，结果连轻松吃下东西都辛苦。我在买食物的时候，那个大叔突然大大声在我面前喊说：“小姐！ 要什么！” 。然后我心想，哇你的语气要告诉我说你好像很歧视女生。。很看不起女生的感觉，然后我再看看他两旁都是女生。。老婆女儿。。心想这些女生们都没有为女生不公平而出声。。也难怪大叔的无礼可以到这个地步
第四，我加入了一个慈善机构举办的跑步，热爱运动的我，平时都有健身。身体健壮。自己的体力不比一般男人差。很多人说男人女人体力不能相比，其实女人如果要认真练起体力来说，我不觉得会很差。但我在跑步时，自然以本身体力，自然跑起步相对比较快。然后听到一位女士对着男士说“看，连一位aunty 都快过你”。 然后我心里又想，哇。。这番话很歧视老女人，女人叻。。最无奈的是女士自己其实也是女人🤣。无语又无奈。😵💫唯有继续跑吧。
还有遇到不卖食物给我的乡村uncle. 不变性能带来许多麻烦，不单不能做回自己，还要遭受歧视，排挤。这只是其中一部分，还有很多其他非常过分的对待不能一一说明，不然会很长。
一个人天生有能力有错吗？ 我会埋冤自己为什么我的能力要放在女人的身体上，更糟糕的是为什么要在马来西亚这个落后又保守的地方受尽苦头呢。但我没有怨天怨地，抬头苦面对自己说再苦也是命中注定的一条命。好好活下去，再加上来自贫穷家庭。有苦自己懂，有泪自己察。希望自己努力赚多点钱，可以有足够钱去一个懂得尊重人权的国家生活。不期望有朋友，只希望拥有基本尊重，选择过一个自己想要的生活
本人觉得你太敏感而且没有对普通百姓的谅解
第一，外观而言在这个中性打扮，各种性别不明的社会你要一个对男女有鲜明主观的人怎么去辨别你的性别？还有boss只是个对男性比较情切的称呼，朋友间也叫boss这只是当地习俗，不包含你说的社会地位的考量。Sir/madam (miss)这里就体现了男方不管什么身份都是sir, 而出于对女性的礼貌（敏感的玻璃心）都会区分, 然而你却觉得这是对你的不平等？？？叫你kakak，miss是显得你年轻点。我都是一律叫美女，不管老少。（但是还是会有些女人觉得我在调戏她？？我就莫名奇妙）你的问题你自己也知道，敏感，自卑，知识不高（你自己说的）我就当你见识不多吧
第二，这个我不便说什么。有太多可能性了，如果是17-25岁之间的男性大多是直男，不成熟，更不会考虑别人的感受，也可能是你的性格问题。所以不好说。但是对于女生也会对你不尊重，我不负责任大胆猜测问题可能出在你的身上。
第三，更加证实了问题是您自身的敏感。小贩uncle大多数嗓门都很大，见怪不怪啊。。。。。和歧视女性什么关系？？
第四，在相同条件下男性身体素质比女性强这个是科学证实的，对于那个人的发言可能不是很恰当但是他是在激将他的朋友，主目的也不是要贬低女性。。。。就只是你敏感。
第五，我觉得马来西亚不开放但也不保守，但是对于你要去别的国家体验，我双手支持。你需要的不是尊重，你需要的是开开眼界。祝您早日康复。
i think not everything can be gender equlity like what jiawen said the football competition, nobody actually knows american female national team won world cup 2 times. But for this issue, jiawen should question why nobody knows instead of just directly point this is designed for man. From the aspect of physically, man is more competitive in this sport which means it more entertained to watch. When a lot of people find it is more interesting to watch man football match instead of woman, then a lot of financial players will more willing to sponsor more to man competitions or leagues because this can gain public attention and eventually bring benefits to them. Gender equality environment is not for every sport, but some surely able to do it like e-sport, chess etc. For woman only coaches, i really like this idea but should consider decrease the number of coaches because most of the time the woman only coaches wouldnt pack. I myself use mrt almost everyday, peak hour is not joke, the whole coaches is very pack except woman only coaches. This leads to a very weird scene or phenomena where all the men pack like a sardine can and when you see the woman only coaches, its not even filled up and left many empty spaces. Im not against this idea and i also feel that its necessary to have woman only coaches, but is it necessary to have that much of woman only coaches where most of time it just half empty?
That’s the point, why men football is more well known is because it is more entertaining to watch, why the hell everything similar to this have to link to gender equality? Is this the reason why women’s football is not well known? This is not a rational discussion, is clearly throwing bullshit
@@d8y8220she’s just using 1 example of how capitalism is shaping the society. Like how sports is for men, modelling is for women, STEM is for men, nursing is for women. Though it’s true that it’s created based on strengths of genders, but the unwanted effects is the negative bias against the other gender.
Like “all” men are less emotional, less caring, women are less serious and less professional.
Agreed with the points that not all sports should goes into the discussion of gender equality. In today sports, both male and female sports are competitive and entertaining. The only thing difference is the audience acceptance and response, whereby this is their rights to choose their preferences for sports. Same goes to the huge gap differences in game ticket or winning prize of different sports like badminton vs tennis. Hence, the lesser attention given to female sports are due to society preferences and lesser financial players are interested to invest to the market. This issue reflects on the pay of the male vs female players as well.
The concept of fostering equality of opportunity is undeniably commendable, as it strives to ensure that every individual, regardless of background or circumstance, has an equitable chance to pursue their aspirations and fulfill their potential. However, advocating for equality of outcome raises valid concerns, as it entails an impractical and potentially detrimental endeavor, undermining merit-based incentives that drive productivity and progress in society.
@@Hirotara Bro, I suggest you to look up the two terms "equality of opportunity" and "equality of outcome". People can claim they support gender equality but which kind of equality? You seem to mock this bro above, but your TLDR for him fail to reflect even a cent of what he said
@@Hirotara Lots of people have the misconception view on feminist movement. Feminism is a spectrum that there is no single set of characteristics to define it. At one end, could be extreme (Misandry) while at the other end (traditional roles). Most women are in the middle ground but conflicted by the unconscious education and cultural influence of the current patriarchy societies.
Same as men rights groups, which is a spectrum. Some can go to the extreme right (Incels, Misogyny) while the other end. Most of them are in the middle. The confusion still lies in the privilege status in the patriarchy societies, which leads to lots of blind-spots and unwilling to surrender the benefits of being privileged.
If all the people have the equality mindset, the society will be different than what we experience, although we can only imagine how will be, but unable to really know how it is.
@@ahantu another commendable argument. I hope u are a Malaysian. It goes to show how clear-headed we are about the issue.
mrt4个宝箱，女生有2个。结果每次男生的满了，结果女的一大推位原因就是一半的女生做普通的。我们男生也不敢坐女的然后你就会发现很搞笑的现象车子有位子可是人不能坐因为是“女性包厢”。我是蛮反对的，这样做会害我们很多男生做不到位子。竟然要这样做，为何很多女生还是可以一起做普通包厢，而且如果是情侣怎么办要坐在男生还是女生的位子。我曾经看过一个情侣被迫分开就因为这个专属女生座位。这跟看电影分男女一样很奇怪？这不是男女平等吧，这是制造麻烦罢了，干嘛越做越保守。你以为你这样做会降低犯罪率咩，那些变态跟容易锁定目标咯。我看到很多男生眼睛偶然会往下那个女性包厢原因可能不是想强奸还是性骚扰而是是dulan一推空位子不可以坐的无奈。妈的影片里面访问的都是没坐过mrt的男生不然就是受益的女生当然同意，有经历过这个痛苦的男生肯定不接受有位子还要傻傻站1个小时。
我觉得这种女性包厢的解决方法是个非常敷衍的解决方法。就好像人民吵物价太高钱不够用政府发subsidy一样。如果不从根解决，这种表面性的解决方法能解决多少问题？那当然对于遇到问题的人来说就是有好过没有咯，暂时性解决问题咯
其实女性包厢也有男的
嘉雯完全不提这事, 可见得女权对她洗脑的程度. 考虑到男性吗?
男女要完全平等是不可能的 自然法则上的生理构造本来就不一样
What aunty said the wage paid to men is higher than women that isn’t true. The wage is calculated based on how much profit you can bring to a firm and of course, your capabilities to work for your employer
But I think the argument lies with women can bring profit/contributions to the company too, so why are they "paid lower"?
这女权主义是我越来越不能接受的东西 单单拿这集来说就好了 几乎全部都是叫男生如何改变 却没有人叫女生改变 女生在享有着和男生平等权利的当儿 却不想拿着男生以前到现在的责任
dating时 只要男的不买单 基本上95%是bye bye了
多少女生会想和没车没房的男生在一起？
多少女生喜欢矮过自己的人?
多少女生喜欢赚少过自己的人？
说到运动 为什么FIFA World Cup关注度那么高？就是因为给多数人来说 很刺激啊 有多少人甚至多少女性会去看女性足球杯？又有多少女性可以说出出名的女足球员？
如果男女能平等 那么为什么在运动界 男变女的变性人 不能在女性运动比赛？因为成年男性肌肉量都多女性很多啊
老师 媒体业 会计师 护士 等等行业 都是女性占多数 没人提 却变相看那些女性不怎么有兴趣的行业 然后做比较
模特儿行业 女性薪水比男性多10倍 没人要检讨下吗？
那些粗工抬抬杠杠 3D工作都多数是男性 女权怎么不帮忙分担却找白领功来实践女权主义呢？？？？
大学生女性占60%以上 女权看都不看 拿回美国现象来study, 70年代 男性大学生60%以上 女性少过40% 当时的女权一直说不公平 想在已经terbalik了 而且比例越差越大 女权继续静静 我们马来西亚在这方面几乎一模一样
再看看小学中学 你们应该会看到 多数女生成绩都好过男性 其实你们有没有想过这个问题？用生理角度来看 女性在理论课上是比男生强的 + 女性本来就早过男生发育 是先天优势 而男生是晚发育 + 在实体行动的课程是强过女生 在晚发育+课程多数是理论课的情况 对男生是极大的劣势 对女生是极大的优势 女权倒是发发生啊
在说说MRT女性车厢 女性可以使用100%的车厢 而男性却只有75% 请问这就是所谓的男女平等了？而且以我在电台听到的 男性女性总性骚扰比例是1:1
拿KTM女性车厢问题来说说 高峰时期 6节车厢 2节女性专用 女性车厢却是空空如也 而其它4节却挤爆 女性去普通车厢 = 女性权益 男性去女性车厢 = 不可理喻 + 兄弟，你会红
总结：
女性占优势 = 没问题
女性占劣势 = 我们必须改变男性来适应我们 而且男性的责任我们不想扛
女性想要和男性一样的权利也请你们拿着和男性一样的责任 别只往白领争 去蓝领争争看啊
男女本身就不能做比较 男性能做的东西 女性未必能 女性能做的东西 男性未必能 为什么像这种女权却偏偏要好像拿水和食物那样来比较 比看谁比较重要？hello 两个都重要 各种function都不同 hello
看了那么多留言，就你的最真实
这种左胶政治正确害死人的，你看欧美你就知道了
@TJ chun 如果您说女性没有去争蓝领的位置。其实是有但马来西亚所有的雇主都不请女性。如果您去看各大华文报纸及各大网站招聘都写着：送货员，男性。园艺工人，男性。像我们是个女性，想要当园艺工人时就看到招聘广告只请男性，也是很😡。当您去看Rapid巴士其实有很多女性司机，当您去看Grab,Lalamove的Rider其实也有很多女性啊！。
@@weiweichong4937 没办法 想要把这些fact slap在那些女权脸上 他们对我而言只是机会主义者 想要好的却不想拿不好的 神是她们 鬼也是她们
破防惹哦 🥵🥵
哎！看了很多留言：大家都认为女性专用车厢是属于女权主义，女性专用停车场对于男生说也是性别不平等。大家好像忘记了自己的国家是伊斯兰世俗国的国情。女性专用车厢是要符合伊斯兰教义因为在伊斯兰教义中是未婚男女不可以接触。至于女性专用停车场是要方便孕妇，不要让孕妇走得太远而流或突然生产。这些都是要避免陌生人因紧急情况而处于尴尬情况因为购物中心的保安人员都是男性。🙄
那么你问问自己为什么没有女人愿意当保安？而且嘉宾强调的是女性被骚扰所以需要特别待遇。男性就可以被骚扰吗？别一张嘴喊着平等同时又同时又要求特别待遇。扭曲的女权根本是虚伪
嘉雯讲话真的很有智慧！我也赞同嘉雯的看法
有点恐怖，那个点是智慧
首先明白什么是gender equality vs feminism。平安年代，唱说男女平等，女性车厢，ladies day / night；不用到战争年代已经歌唱女性小孩优先逃离，男的保卫国家，天天说男要gentleman，累活苦劳扛东西男性包办，不要小气计较。Gender equality 不是buffet，只拿你喜欢的。不然是feminism priorities。
The Indonesian student speaks very well.
最重要还是男女平等课题，不管种族不同，什么一大堆
Women's world cup is forgettable, even women themselves don't watch, so it is by default when you say world cup, it is men's world cup
Exactly her point. It’s World Cup and women’s World Cup, NBA and WNBA. Why not MNBA, or Men’s World Cup.
Like tennis, there’s no Grand slam and Women’s grand slam, it’s just grand slam. Or MMA, or even olympics.
@@jiawei0917 So renaming it Men's world cup or Men's watever will solve the problem of low viewership? lololololol
@@jiawei0917 The sport with true gender equality is men's sport because there's no gender requirements and people is looking for the best sport person regardless of genders, that's why it's just world cup not men world cup.
The truth is in reality there won't be equal between men and women. That's why people create a women category specifically only for women so that women can have opportunities to participate in the sport.
@@jiawei0917 lol i thought there is already WNBA just woman themself also don't wanna watch it that why it's not valued as the NBA? so you wan sponsor to invest a low roi league just because it's gender equality ??? so how about miss world situation with Mr world? at the end it still depend on which have the higher viewer and roi return. If you expected a mix league do you think it's a fair fight for women? this topic doesn't even should consider as a gender equality topic at all
mrt女生車廂和女生停車位，是提供了特別待遇給了女生群體。
如果當初專屬女性的車廂和車位是爲了保護女性被男生性騷擾，那麽有沒有數據顯示因爲有了專屬，性騷擾的案件就降低了？
如果是降低了，下一步是怎樣？增加更多的女性專屬空間？
這個政策根本不是在解決問題，只是把問題隔離，暫時掩蓋起來。
也因爲有特別的待遇，這個政策根本不是男女平等。
停車場你們付一樣的停車費，但是他們有專屬的車位，男生們就要停更加遠的地方，化更長時間來找停車位。
对
@SkyLee 女性停车位是给予孕妇因为上天只给女性怀孕但不给男生怀孕。😊
@@visHan8 那麼停車位可以是專屬給孕婦，如殘障人士停車位那樣。
不是女性專屬。
用女性權利來包裝來得到特權，這個舉動就不是男女平等了。
正如馬來人特權，短期看在幫助馬來人，長期只是會製造更多問題和令受優待的人渴望更多優待的惡性循環。
2:13 哇老嘉雯讲要超越，你放lucas的ig😂😂
恶意的男权主义打压女权的小证据？
我覺得男女平等在馬來西亞真的還好，也一直在進步， 馬來西亞現在的問題是宗教極端者在壓縮其他宗教信仰者的自由
整个影片比较有内容的是 女性车厢这一块内容罢了。我觉得女性车厢设计就是为了让有需要的女性（怀孕，生理期身体不舒服等能够坐）去乘搭公共交通，而不是为了预防 性骚扰。
男女平等应该更多是体现在都有公平机会，例如说应聘一个岗位，不应该以女性会怀孕等这种借口来阻止她们发展机会。但我不希望不要矫枉过正啦，就是好像在任何场合都要男女平等这样。男女平等讲求的是男女合作，不是仇视男性 拿以前的价值观来punish现在的男性要为以前历史其他男生偿还 这我就不能接受啦
当一个男人被女人欺负，家暴时社会给的论语是女人打男人会有几伤？但如果被家暴时男人还手就被社会定论：那个男人打女人哦。要男女平等的话就不管男女，先动手的就错。
女性车厢有個明顯的缺點，只要踏過MRT上班都會發覺高峰时段時女性车厢的载客量遠遠不如普通車廂
把話講說實在點，就是說女性根本不願意最优化地善用被給予的車廂 - 如果這點不存在，相信沒人會反對這對策。
@@theplaylistpsycho 我是觉得有需求的人坐女性车厢是没问题的
kahmun got triggered with a male sport which males supports deeply, but where is the female supporters in female sports?
这个说到底还是在说女权.....there isn't any gender equality in discussion
The main plot was discussed about how women was neglected in society
Yet they seems to forget, the bleed is also on mens side
I mean 还没结婚的我不知道啦，结婚的，我问一下男生到底吐了多少身家出来cover?真的能很equal ？
既然大家撕开了说，我们也不想一定要因为男生所以约会一定我们要给钱，但是真的可以做到平等？这个社会有真正意义上看到我们的苦？？
平等讲是很容易啊，但撕开来说，我们何时平等过？连教育平等都不可能为前题的我们 ....真的经得起撕开来说？
I would say dowries are discussable with the partners' family, I think it's pretty much just a "意思" rather than an obligation nowadays.
Hmm...maybe it's more about finding a partner who does have similar ideals with you? Like for paying meals, I think it's pretty common among English-educated Chinese to spilt the bills. Maybe it has a relation to Western exposure?
Wow, Msia’s first gender topic! Glad that we are still pretty enlightened about this matter. The west is collapsing over this unimportant matter. Nevertheless, men and women are never equal. The faster we accept this fact, the faster our society can move on
PS: The Indonesian girl has fallen into the trap of feminism unfortunately, thinking that men & women are equal
Hmm... calling gender equality an "unimportant matter"
Have you considered how important/beneficial gender equality is to both sides? If men does not need to be the sole breadwinner of the family, women can help with the financial burden of the family while men can also help with the burden of household chores, including child rearing. This is just a very very basic thing that is asked of.
I personally think gender equality is more about trying to gain a better life for all men and women, I don't think it necessarily means to get the "exact same rights". But as how there are many facets to all things, there will be those who are on "the extremes". Some just want basic fair rights, while there are also those with ideas we find it hard to agree with.
@@OdyLoveMusic I appreciate your argument. Totally do. Much better than what most western feminist would put forth their logic on the matter. I understand where you're coming from where both male and female help each other with their biological defined roles in a nuclear family. Totally understand that standpoint.
However, men and women are never equal. And the more we expect the other gender to perform what was not primarily their biological role, the more we fall into the trap of gender equality or feminism. Males are born to be hunters and to provide for the family while females are born to nurture and take care of the family from within. To put it simply, males are suppose to earn and make a living for the family and females are to nurture and grow the family
Fastforward to 2024, we are now in a position that our roles in a family have been so blurred, that we are now even arguing about stuff like "what is a man" or "what is a woman". It's just pretty sad
If Kah Mun is really a feminist then why is she so silent about the women in Gaza???
the tealive sponsor part sibeh funny leh, sai cannot swallow LOL. also aunty is the best interviewee on this episode hehe
女权重要但不是给女生谋取利益利用的口号，有利益时就说女权，没利益时就说自己只是一个柔弱的女人💁😂。
最无解为什么总是会拿运动来比较性别 难道真的没更好的例子吗？以我的见解 运动是以关注力以及人气来做衡量标准 谁收视越高他就是大赢家 看男生足球的比例肯定远远高出女生 原因我想大家有所而知 这与性别毫无关联 拿网球做另一个比较吧 为何女网球的关注力一直都那么的受欢迎 难道是观众故意选择性差别待遇足球吗？还是因为网球收买了观众？这是你想带出来的意思吗？
赞同，我是女的。。。我觉得用运动来讲女权本身很荒谬。。。难道要全世界要为了女生把球改小吗？就像女模特儿的薪水比男模特高， 哪男生平权呢？因为女生和男生都喜欢不同东西， 女生也有看world cup但更多喜欢看时尚明星。。。
同意，去tag她来看，理性一点分析
所以女权的形象为什么会那么负面就是这样
這樣子啊，那建構維持社會正常行序的大部分基層工作如維護電力修路建築開車運輸送貨消防员等等太多例子都需要大量體力勞力跟觀注力的工作，为何極高比例都是男的在做？ 談男女平等，根本BS ，劝你好好看清现实不要被西方文化跟烂媒體给洗女權主義脑
真的， 要这么说那世界小姐也是比世界先生出名啊没看她们要讲。 这个社会有很多双标，女的做没事男的就犯大忌了，这她们不说。 如果要真的平等就一切都平等，就像很多女生觉得约会就是男的请客是固然的，如果男的不请就被批评了, 这不也是不平等的。😶我也赞成平等，but是正真意义上的平等 但这不可能因为生理本就不一样还不如就各自在各自有利的环境发展呢。 男生性侵的数据少就因为男生都不报案，报了还要被嘲笑可能还被反告 谁报哦 很多女生被瞪就觉得性侵了，but 男生不会？就现在的法律性侵也就保护女生？
男女平等，不把体格体能放在考虑或争取的范围很make sense啊！
P S. 后制做的很棒👍🏻👍🏻
如果不能把体格能考虑争取范围，hormones 也应该不可以是吗，还是你觉得可以的就是可以，你觉得不可以的就是不可以。希望不要把怀胎10个月的故事也 讲出来哦
@@qq-ec2sk generally, 男女体格有天渊之别，你难道不知道？你是外星人？体育项目分男女组，电竞棋类歌艺乐器没分男女组。很难懂？
我不过是在关于体格这方面发表小小意见，并没有在advocate 任何事情，更没有在怼任何人。请不要滥用社交媒体，把自己的怨恨发泄在别人身上。善哉，善哉！😇😇😇
The sources of inequality in our nation stem from extremist politicians, the influence of "Asian" culture and traditions, and the presence of Islamic Syaria Law. A potential avenue for addressing this issue could involve reconsidering the adherence to Syaria Law and adopting a more secular approach, fostering a more inclusive and equitable society.
女权就是个伪命题，他所说的足球男生的比赛观赏性高于女生足球，受到的关注高于女生足球也是市场决定的结果。毕竟大部分女生都不喜欢看足球，尤其是早期，难道强迫男生去看自己不喜欢的女生足球这就是平等？为何不说芭蕾舞，钢管舞，肚皮舞的男生受到的关注低于女生，而且很多学芭蕾舞的男生还要被人骂臭阿瓜。如果抛开性别，一个歌手自己红不起来，他怪这世界对他不公平同样的道理
女权并不是伪命题，它强调的是在各个领域追求平等和公正的机会。对于足球的观赏性问题，确实，目前男子足球的比赛观赏性和关注度较高，但这并不是因为女性足球运动员的能力不足，而是历史和社会因素造成的。长久以来，女子足球缺乏与男子足球同等的支持和曝光，这直接影响了其市场发展。例如，直到最近几年，女子世界杯才逐渐获得更多的关注和支持。相比之下，男子足球在全球范围内得到了大量的媒体报道和商业赞助，这自然为其市场发展提供了巨大的助力。
关于芭蕾舞、钢管舞、肚皮舞等表演形式，确实男性受到的关注较少，但这同样是性别刻板印象和社会偏见的结果。男性从事这些领域也面临不公平的待遇和嘲笑，这表明性别偏见对两性都有负面影响。女权运动并不仅仅关注女性的权利，而是反对所有形式的性别歧视和不公正。
好心你啦，将一个歌手的成功与否与性别问题相比很白目也很不恰当。一个歌手的成功更多取决于个人才能、市场需求和运气，而性别平等问题涉及的是系统性和结构性的不公正。女性在职场、体育和其他领域面临的挑战，不仅仅是因为个人能力问题，而是因为长期存在的性别偏见和社会不公平。
强迫男性观看女子足球并不是女权的目的。女权运动追求的是为女性争取与男性同等的资源和机会，让女性在公平的环境中展示她们的才能和潜力。通过增加对女子足球的支持和宣传，可以吸引更多的观众和赞助，从而逐渐改变市场格局，实现真正的平等。相反，否认这些问题的存在，只会继续加深性别不平等，阻碍社会的全面进步。
总之，女权运动不仅仅是为了女性，更是为了消除所有形式的性别不公，推动一个更加平等和公正的社会。忽视这些问题，简单地将其归结为市场选择或个人能力问题，是对性别不平等的漠视和否认。
@@yummymax7103 平权尚可以一论，女权的目的名字里已经预示了她的终点。历史和社会因素这个不能被列入考量因为如果你要把它放进来说，那战争时代男性是主角，现在女性说的男性社会地位高于女性这一说也是男性在历史长河中争取回来的功劳，所以女性本来就应该承认男人的社会地位？这不符合现在的逻辑吧？
再者两性在职场，体育和其他领域上有本质上的区别，只是你愿不愿意看见。比方说女生生理上就是会有那几天影响到她，又或者是普遍不会去搬砖等体力活。体育上也有区别跳水女性观赏性好很多，同样的女性羽毛球主打拉吊，男性这是暴力扣杀（当然不排除少数怪物）。这些都会影响观赏性，一些是姿态，一些是技巧，一些是力量。如此说来男性喜欢男足是因为相比女足男足更具爆发力，何以见得女足就是缺乏支持和曝光而不是市场趋势呢？没人说女性运动员能力不足啊，但至少你要同等资源你得拿出个同等盈利啊。。以你现在的逻辑就是我达不到业绩考勤是因为历史因素，你先给我同等资源，我再给你冲业绩一个说法。逻辑是你先体现价值再去索取回报吧，不是吗？
女权目的是争取与男性同等的资源和机会，那相对的你也要女足能赚取相对的收入啊。。。。。你以为足联都是做慈善的吗？而且百分比来说女足为俱乐部赚取的兑换率还比普遍男足高。为什么伟大的足球健将比利能成为一代佳话靠的不是什么黑人弱势群体的发声而是他的才华，以一人之力为黑人在足坛争取一席之地，而反而来到女性这就要靠什么女权来打压男性呢，抱怨什么历史因素??比方说，乒乓球大魔王就好，也是女性，但是也得到很多男性的崇拜因为他以怪物的身体素质碾压部分男性好手，虽然她的打法也很接近男性就是了。
何为真正的平等？女的上战场拼搏，去工地搬砖，男的去产房生产？？？这世界只有平衡，不存在平等，女权就是强行打压男性取得女性地位的存在，好比说女性车厢减少了男性可用的空间，这公平？比起理想中的两性对等那还倒不如把所有差别数据化，比如工作态度，考情，社交能力，销售能力，社会信誉这些给数据化实现透明的个人数据让社会去决定你的地位还比较容易且公正。。。。
再说滥用女权的趋势比真平权女性的呼声更高好吗，女权就是一个类似宗教的武器，一念天堂一念地狱，而历史证明了把这种力量交到人类手中往往结局就是悲剧。给你一个例子sweet baby inc 这类打着女权标杆来勒索男性市场的产物也是女权的附属品，而我至今没有听说任何所谓的真女权来抨击并做出实际的反抗。如此说来女权就只是保护女权，哪来什么平等地位一说，根本就没看到男人们的委屈，一味的打压？
@@dango529 这位男士你好，虽然你这整篇回复充满了各种语病和逻辑错误，看得我很不爽（不好意思职业病发作），但我还是认真读完了，以下是我分三次给你的回复。：）
你说女权的目的从名字中就预示了它的终点，虽然不知道你是怎么看得到它的“终点”的，但我觉得你对女权主义好像有很多的误解。女权主义不仅仅是为了女性，而是为了所有性别的平等。虽然名字中包含“女”，但它的核心是反对任何形式的性别歧视，无论针对男性还是女性。其终极目标是消除性别不公，建立一个更加平等和公正的社会。将女权主义视为仅仅是为女性争取权利而忽略其对整体性别平等的贡献，是对其本质的片面理解。
关于历史和社会因素的讨论，你认为这些因素不应被列入考量，因为男性在历史上通过战争等方式争取到了当前的社会地位。但你好像不知道这种观点直接忽略了历史和社会结构对性别角色的影响。历史上的性别角色分工并不是自然而然的结果，而是受各种社会、经济和文化因素的影响。现代社会应该反思和纠正这些历史不公，而不是继续沿用这些偏见来合理化当前的性别不平等。历史上，女性被排除在许多领域之外，正是因为这些排除，才导致了今天的性别不平等。承认和修正这些历史因素是实现真正平等的重要一步，这才是我们说的女权和性别平权。
你提到两性在职场、体育等领域有本质区别，我也不否认，但前提是我们需要明确女权运动的核心目标是什么。女权并不是要求男女在每个方面都做到完全一样，而是要在各自的特点和优势的基础上，争取平等的机会和资源。体能上的差异并不是女权的关注点，请你搞清楚一点，两性平权强调的是机会的平等，而不是能力的同等.比如在工作场所中，女权倡导的是女性应当在招聘、晋升、薪酬等方面享有与男性同等的机会，而不是要求女性必须在体力劳动上与男性竞争, This is so basic bro但显然你并不清楚。同样在体育领域，女权倡导的是对女性运动员的支持和宣传，应当与男性运动员相当，而不是因为观赏性不同就给予不同的资源分配。
@@dango529 还有，男性足球之所以更具市场吸引力，很大程度上是因为历史上对男足的投资和支持远超女足。这种资源的不平等导致了今天的市场格局，这是无可否认的因素，而不是简单的市场选择或观众偏好，更不是什么“男性喜欢男足是因为男足更具爆发力”。你说女足只是因为市场趋势而不是缺乏支持和曝光？那你知道吗，历史上想参与足球的女性曾多次受到禁止和限制。例如，1921年，英格兰足球协会（FA）禁止女性在会员俱乐部的球场上踢球，这一禁令持续了50年，直到1971年才被解除女足长期以来缺乏与男足同等的资源和曝光，正是因为这一点，女足的市场吸引力才无法与男足相比。长期以来，男足获得了显著更多的财政支持。在20世纪初期，欧洲各国纷纷建立职业男足联赛，吸引了大量投资和观众。而女足直到20世纪末和21世纪初才开始逐渐获得类似的投资。男足比赛一直是主流媒体关注的焦点。20世纪以来，男足比赛在报纸、广播和电视中得到广泛报道，而女足比赛则被忽视。举个例子，男足世界杯自1930年首次举办以来，每届比赛都吸引了全球的关注和报道，而女足世界杯直到1991年才首次举办。男足历来获得的财政投入显著高于女足。以国际足联（FIFA）为例，男足世界杯的奖金远远高于女足世界杯。2018年男足世界杯的总奖金为4亿美元，而2019年女足世界杯的总奖金仅为3000万美元。男足在全球范围内也享有更多和更好的训练设施和场地。许多女足球队直到最近才开始享受到与男足相当的基础设施。
历史上对男足的投资和支持远超女足，这种资源的不平等才导致了今天的市场格局。这不仅仅是简单的市场选择或观众偏好的结果，ridiculous bro,这是长期以来历史和社会因素共同作用的结果。下次想反驳人请先去了解历史背景或是相关的基本知识，谢谢。正如你提到的业绩考核问题，如果一个员工长期得不到资源和机会，他很难在短时间内表现出色。对女足的支持和投资，是为了给女足创造公平的竞争环境，而不是在一开始就要求其与男足相同的盈利能力，懂？“逻辑是你先体现价值再去索取回报吧，不是吗？”你很直接的忽略了资源和机会的不平等对价值体现的影响。在一个公平的环境中，每个人都应该有机会展示自己的才能，获得应有的回报。而在一个长期不公平的环境中，那些被剥夺资源和机会的人很难体现出他们的真实价值。因此先给予公平的机会和资源，然后再评估其表现，才是真正的公平。
此外，你说女足为俱乐部赚取的兑换率更高，这正是因为女足在资源不足的情况下，仍然能够展现出高效的价值。如果给予女足与男足同等的支持，其潜力和市场吸引力必将进一步提高。足联确实不是做慈善的啊，但它作为市场主体，应该认识到对女足的投资是长期的战略投资。通过增加对女足的支持，不仅可以推动体育的整体发展，还可以开拓新的市场，吸引更多的观众和赞助商。女足的成功不仅带来直接的经济回报，还可以提升品牌价值，增加球迷的忠诚度和整体市场的多样性。但我前面也已经说了，男足在历史上获得了更多的投资和支持，这些投资包括训练设施、教练资源、媒体曝光等，这些资源帮助男足建立了广泛的市场基础和观众群体。女足由于历史上的资源不足，在市场上自然处于劣势。你提到Pele? 拜托一下啦，比较Pele和女足运动员的成功也需要考虑到多种因素，而不仅仅是个人才能。Pele的成功不仅归功于个人才能，他能成功并推动黑人运动员在足球界的地位，也得益于他所处时代的媒体宣传和足球在全球的普及，他并不是在资源匮乏的情况下取得成功，请搞清楚。我没有在抱怨历史因素啊，你在那边什么“女性要靠女权打压男性”啊？别太搞笑了大哥，急什么你？我只是在阐述事实啊。
@@dango529 还有，男性足球之所以更具市场吸引力，很大程度上是因为历史上对男足的投资和支持远超女足。这种资源的不平等导致了今天的市场格局，这是无可否认的因素，而不是简单的市场选择或观众偏好，更不是什么“男性喜欢男足是因为男足更具爆发力”。你说女足只是因为市场趋势而不是缺乏支持和曝光？那你知道吗，历史上想参与足球的女性曾多次受到禁止和限制。例如，1921年，英格兰足球协会（FA）禁止女性在会员俱乐部的球场上踢球，这一禁令持续了50年，直到1971年才被解除女足长期以来缺乏与男足同等的资源和曝光，正是因为这一点，女足的市场吸引力才无法与男足相比。长期以来，男足获得了显著更多的财政支持。在20世纪初期，欧洲各国纷纷建立职业男足联赛，吸引了大量投资和观众。而女足直到20世纪末和21世纪初才开始逐渐获得类似的投资。男足比赛一直是主流媒体关注的焦点。20世纪以来，男足比赛在报纸、广播和电视中得到广泛报道，而女足比赛则被忽视。举个例子，男足世界杯自1930年首次举办以来，每届比赛都吸引了全球的关注和报道，而女足世界杯直到1991年才首次举办。男足历来获得的财政投入显著高于女足。以国际足联（FIFA）为例，男足世界杯的奖金远远高于女足世界杯。2018年男足世界杯的总奖金为4亿美元，而2019年女足世界杯的总奖金仅为3000万美元。男足在全球范围内也享有更多和更好的训练设施和场地。许多女足球队直到最近才开始享受到与男足相当的基础设施。
历史上对男足的投资和支持远超女足，这种资源的不平等才导致了今天的市场格局。这不仅仅是简单的市场选择或观众偏好的结果，ridiculous bro,这是长期以来历史和社会因素共同作用的结果。下次想反驳人请先去了解历史背景或是相关的基本知识，谢谢。正如你提到的业绩考核问题，如果一个员工长期得不到资源和机会，他很难在短时间内表现出色。对女足的支持和投资，是为了给女足创造公平的竞争环境，而不是在一开始就要求其与男足相同的盈利能力，懂？“逻辑是你先体现价值再去索取回报吧，不是吗？”你很直接的忽略了资源和机会的不平等对价值体现的影响。在一个公平的环境中，每个人都应该有机会展示自己的才能，获得应有的回报。而在一个长期不公平的环境中，那些被剥夺资源和机会的人很难体现出他们的真实价值。因此先给予公平的机会和资源，然后再评估其表现，才是真正的公平。
此外，你提到女足为俱乐部赚取的兑换率更高，这正是因为女足在资源不足的情况下，仍然能够展现出高效的价值。如果给予女足与男足同等的支持，其潜力和市场吸引力必将进一步提高。足联确实不是做慈善的啊，但它作为市场主体，应该认识到对女足的投资是长期的战略投资。通过增加对女足的支持，不仅可以推动体育的整体发展，还可以开拓新的市场，吸引更多的观众和赞助商。女足的成功不仅带来直接的经济回报，还可以提升品牌价值，增加球迷的忠诚度和整体市场的多样性。但我前面也已经说了，男足在历史上获得了更多的投资和支持，这些投资包括训练设施、教练资源、媒体曝光等，这些资源帮助男足建立了广泛的市场基础和观众群体。女足由于历史上的资源不足，在市场上自然处于劣势。你提到Pele? 拜托一下啦，比较Pele和女足运动员的成功也需要考虑到多种因素，而不仅仅是个人才能。Pele的成功不仅归功于个人才能，他能成功并推动黑人运动员在足球界的地位，也得益于他所处时代的媒体宣传和足球在全球的普及，他并不是在资源匮乏的情况下取得成功，请搞清楚。我没有在抱怨历史因素啊，你在那边什么“女性要靠女权打压男性”啊？别太搞笑了大哥，急什么你？我只是在阐述事实啊。
1. "这个世界是以男性的角度来设计的"
这句话本身就自相矛盾，因为它有个隐藏前提，就是这个世界就是男人设计的，而这个前提本身就歧视女性。
2. 如果说到世界杯就想到男子组，就是歧视女性，
那说到护士就想到女护士，是不是歧视男人呢？
这时候肯定又有人说了，就是父权主义让社会出现这类刻板印象。
所以结论是，不管怎么说都是父权主义的错
不大认同World Cup default setting 的观点， 在Sport上面说到Gymnastic, by norms 都会认为是女生居多的运动。说到world design default setting, 这个是基于产品或服务的话题，生产商也肯定会选择利益最大化和最合适的方式去设计产品。For example 市场上几乎不会看到有男性美甲这个商业赛道吧。
嘉文的point 完全和女性没关系。可悲
1，没人知道女生world cup 是market 的问题，不是女性的问题。（打个比喻吧，你们知道的男onlyfans 赚会比女生onlyfans 多吗）
2，piano key 发明家是 Cristofori, 男生，当然他自己设计的东西 是适合他自己（男生）。
3，在职场上，没有女上司吗？没有女老板吗？为什么当女性在上班遇上问题就觉得是女性问题呢？而真的不是能力上的问题？
4，男生遇到的 性侵犯，家暴 少 的原因是男生多数默默承受，是statistically 少,而不是真的比女性少，告上女生家暴成功有几个？可悲是当男生遇到 性侵犯或者家暴都默默承受原因是因为人们多数会取笑而不是 支持。
5，你真的不可以吧你自己的遭遇 就以为是每个人都是这样，你家人有问题，不并代表每个家庭是那么有问题。我妈妈做家庭主妇很开心，爸爸也很负责任，各有各的责任都做得很好，而没有分你我该做什么。
6，你的知识认知的确 不般配做主播的，多数男生也是来看你的腿，你应该也知道，比如你开始会打扮你也知道这个是advantage，毕竟如果你今天再丑一点应该是没有观众的，说以平等一路来不在于男女，而这世界几乎不存在 完美相待的公平。
7. 我不是觉得对女生公平不重要，but dont put individual problams as world wide matters. the world was never fair and never will be. please look at the worst and poor country , try to explain to them you want to have equality in all spectrum.
有什么想要fight back 的观点欢迎comment。我不介意帮你摆回现实。
男onlyfans赚比较多原因是什么？同性恋比较有钱？
@@tcs2996 sorry，i meant 有男onlyfans 赚比女onlyfans 多吗？
@@tcs2996 What he means is that earning ratio for woman in onlyfans are higher due to the market, rather than gender problem.
@@tcs2996 他是在问问题 问大众男的还是女的onlyfns赚更多 答案是女的 而且多很多 纯属supply demand问题 可是比如说某行业男性赚更多例如足球篮球 女性就会把矛头指向都是男权主义所带来的后果 而不是归咎于supply demand问题 嘉雯如果像她自己说的 SPM 10个11个A的人 那她对我而言就是有智商 没智慧的人罢了
based opinion
I Want the Ang Pao
Can You Just Give Me Plz
Wtf
荒谬
1. 同工不同酬，是因为女生生理上，就是随时可能怀孕（私事），而造成上不了班（公事）。你一个风险比较高的个体，人家当然愿意给的少一点。同理的你去银行贷款，你的欠款风险比较大利息就是比较高，你不去讲歧视你？
2. 运动类，足球本来就是男生受众比较大。你去看时尚设计，不都是女生居多？
3. 讲辩论，男的本来就是理性，逻辑顺利能力就是比较强。女的是很会吵架，但很多就是在无理取闹，真要专业的辩论差远了
4. 讲世界上很多东西都是设计给男生的，你去看外国人的椅子就是比较高，因为他们体格就是大。设计给外国女生的东西你一个亚洲女生也觉得大，那也是在歧视女生？
5. 讲到男生做家务做饭就开口叫好，讲男生不应该因为是男生所以被逼要付钱，就直接skip话题。可笑
如今的女权都是在吃自助餐罢了
按照嘉文的女性车厢逻辑，是不是也可以说女性主权是多余的？或许我们只需要一个组织来解决不平等就足够了。而且，每次把女权和男权运动拿来比较，有点让我反感。这样的比较可能让人觉得提问者更倾向于性别歧视。运动本来就是依赖热度来吸引资金，不能要求每个人都必须了解女性的运动就算他们没兴趣，否则就被指责为女性歧视。。
男女平等的看法我觉得已经越来越倾向女性了。就不说体能吧，因为这是天生男生比较壮，不应该把体能来衡量男女平等。我给个例子：单亲家庭援助～政府通常只会发给单亲妈妈，所以单亲爸爸只好靠自己因为他是男人所以可以忽略不计。是的，单亲爸爸个案不多但是不是就应该被忽略？女司机专用车位我看不到有对女性什么实际上的帮助因为那个车位不过是在普通车位的旁边，这样真的可以避免女性被侵犯？男性是不会被打劫？
@raymonding 女士专用车厢是提供便利给予孕妇及符合我国伊斯兰国情。
连钢琴都能被扯到性别平等。
那我也可以说piccolo（短笛）太小，男生没办法好好用，是不是要把短笛加大啊？那不好意思短笛加大就变成长笛（flute）了，这两者根本就是不同的乐器。
当然钢琴也一样，不同尺寸会生产不同的音质。
乐器本来不应该有性别之分，况且也有很多专业的女性钢琴演奏家啊。
有些小孩子还不是一样把钢琴表演得好好的吗？按照嘉雯的逻辑钢琴的发明是不是也是小孩歧视？
自己弹不好钢琴不要责怪发明钢琴的人性别歧视。
嘉雯真的是很典型的女权主义者。
所以现在离婚的话，是不是男方不一定要给女方赡养费/被分家产？
甚至如果女方是在家里的收入来源的话，男方可以向女方要赡养费/分家产?
毕竟男方牺牲自己的事业在家里照顾家务/孩子？
Yes! I agree with aunty!!!
女性专用车厢，是在歧视男性，矮化女性。
如果有一天，一群人被分成A、B两组，然后A组被“保护”起来，原因是“避免被B组欺负”，你是B组的一员的话，你会怎样想？
同样的，为什么A组要被保护？只有弱势群体，才需要被特别保护。谁会在石头上面贴张“小心易碎”的标签？所以，你觉得A组人员，是弱势？
女嘉宾说，爸爸假假不会折衣，是男生的Trap。但一开始女主持人说side parking的时候，她笑得很开心... 在她的视角里，男人做就是Trap，女人做就是“这不关性别的事...”。
其实亚洲华裔女权一开口，直接问她“结婚时男人要不要给娉金？”，如果她说不用，那才可以继续谈她的伟论。如果她说要，或者稍微迟疑一下才回答，不用理她说什么“伟论”，可以直接close topic了。
平等？！平等个毛线
我是中立。。我向来都觉得女人不用男友给钱的
女人不给男友钱，但是中立？ 你懂中立吗。你这个是便向。
@@qq-ec2sk 我說的是女人不用男友給錢。。意思是AA。。不算中立吗？🤔 男女平等啊
好的我get 错，你没毛病@@MG-ch7ip
@@qq-ec2sk 哈哈哈 没事🤣
看了很多评论 只能说还有很漫长的路要走
現在的女權要的是自助餐，這個要那個也要但是去當兵就不要了。
理性一点bro, 女权运动并不是在追求“自助餐”式的选择，而是致力于实现性别平等，确保女性在各个领域获得公平的机会、权利和待遇。事实上，许多国家已经允许并欢迎女性参军, 例如美国、以色列和许多欧洲国家都有大量的女性军人，她们在各种军事岗位上表现出色。争取性别平等并不意味着女性拒绝承担与男性相同的责任，而是要确保在所有领域，包括军事领域，女性能够获得公平的机会和资源。性别平等的实现需要在不同领域采取不同的措施，女性在争取平等的教育机会、同工同酬和反对性别暴力等方面的诉求并非是要求特权，而是基本的人权和公正。将女权运动片面地描述为“自助餐”式的选择，是对女性贡献和努力的不公正评价。
Right moment of FF7 OST. Thumbs up.
不用说远，说近的啦。关于EPF家庭主妇可享有津贴，反之家庭主夫却没什么动静、又或者不了了之。难道家庭主夫是不应该的？
平等不到的啦，男的有的女的没有，女的有男的没有平等？男生如果吃软饭都被笑死咯😅😅😅
是个很好的争论题，for me 我是觉得马来西亚还好算是公平，有些比较极端的那些是个人主义以及某某影响照成的，XX比较恐怖点马来西亚真的算很好了，但有些事是的确对女生不公平那女权主义者出来棒说那是对的事情，但有些没意义的事情那都要拿出来说就不大对，我觉得男权女权都好，先看事情再发声才是对的做法而不是什么事情not make sence都要出声那就真的有点XX，没有绝对的对和错
我左手挖着鼻孔，右手留言Wabikong：
求Tealive赞助Wabikong！！！
一碗Penang laksa配Tealive，我说这才是life！😏
(gyfook)
在家里老婆凶一下，看老公敢不敢出声？XD
中肯🤣
辩论女王，我只认可嘉雯你，脑数又转得快，说得又凖确又有条例，让对方想反迫都没法反迫！
still waiting for Ceddy and Vicky Anime Crossover in Wabikong, it can be Wabikong's multiverse haha , also just a suggestion, what if interview Ceddy & Kah Mun together, would that spark more interesting topic :P
说句实际的，这世界不可能平等的。很多事情性别一换就很严重，比如说女孩子拍帅哥发上网找ig很多人都会支持帮忙找，性别一换就变态了。你要跟我讲什么男的没胆去拿，直接去拿就要变成sexual harrashment被别人背后说到乱😂😂
其实有时不是不要坐女性包厢，是刚好到的位置很远，怕关门来不及上mrt所以就随便了。。。
“”一个笑话“” 如果性骚扰判很重，然后女权很霸道，车晃一下，摸到或接触到，她们会喊性骚扰。然后，男生通常会选择直接打女生，因为打架判三个月，性骚扰判三年。各位女权的勇士，我们来切磋一下吗？哈哈
谢谢提醒🤣🤣🤣
So kah mun keep avoiding the topic she has bf anot … means she is attached liao 😂😂 if single she will have admit lol
一直以为之前Tealive就sponsor了才放奶茶在那边😂
我想问一个问题，为什么女性车厢要放在中间？
如果我要过去对面,我要下车绕过去,还是走过去。
真的！！！！！又不可以踏进去
kah mun very logical & smart one. her ability to explain her view clearly with evidences is excellent. I support kah mun and feminism also. women's rights still have a lot of space to develop, gender inequality still exists, men are overestimated overall. in almost every country, the populations of both female/male are quite the same, however the parliment members are mostly men in so many nations including malaysia. women's voices and women's rights must be acknowledged better
Which evidences was clear and excellent ? And why men are overestimate ? When you said that, isn’t that you’re strongly look down on men hard earn achievement instead ? Which part of inequality between men and women in this modern days ? And women is able to join the Parlimen but why was it less ? Why women never go try ? Purely just curious bout your unexplain statement t
那我算什麼？
我們的小家，我賺比較多，家務又是我全包
家裡採購又是我
不认同嘉雯自认为女权主义者因为她还要想结婚生子。😅因为女性在传统思维里是必须一定要保持贞洁及结婚生孩子，这点就是男女不平等的代表。如果谁自认是女性主义者，就要学习吴则天及西方女性为自己而活，而不是被传宗接代的思维绑住。第2：女性一出世早就被造物者制造不平等因为造物者只让女性可以怀孕，为什么不让男性的器官也能怀孕生孩子呢？像海马那样可以生孩子。第3：就是因造物者制造物者制造女性必须怀孕而造成了女性体质虚弱，使到当时的男人都会认为女性拖累者。所以无论在政治上，商业上都以男性的角度。例如女性保险费比男性贵很多即使女性在世界的数据上长寿过男生但却没有女性国会议员出来反抗。而且那些自称女性主义的国会议员过后还不是被传统的道德观念绑着：结婚生孩子照顾孩子。🙄😵💫🤐如果要做真正的女性主义者，男性可以有小三小四，女性应该也要有。😅😂
其实想针对你的第1点来说，女性主义的终极目标就是要释放女性的枷锁，让女生拥有自由选择自己的人生。但是现在却变成结婚生孩子就不是女权，这难道不是套在现代女性身上的另一种枷锁吗？选择单身是女权，选择结婚生孩子也是女权呀。女生就要支持女生，千万不要本末倒置了姐妹 ❤
I don't have Instagram. But I drink Instant coffee. That red hong bao looks very nice. Can I have some from Wabikong?
突然發現嘉雯跟導演長得有點像🤣
其實男生也會受歧視，尤其弱勢男性或者男同志。也有一些遇過渣男或家庭破裂也或者單親媽媽出生女生歧視男生。
Bernice and sai is boyfriend girlfriend?
大男人都是被媽媽帶大的。性別平等是沒有feminist or lgbtq等labels的，沒有特權由能力決定。
马上Like Comment & Subscribe ❤
来支持嘉文的👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
I’m from kl and agree that Penang food is so much better ❤
虽说平等，但实际一点都没有
先说说本人的立场微偏向男方。
性骚扰，强奸问题，提高教育水平和人民素质，加大惩罚力度就好了（不管男女）。女性车厢，女性泊车位都好，多多少少都影响了男性，虽然几乎微不足道但还是不公平（积少成多）。当然用下半身思考的人还是会有，抓去严刑（如果之后发现被诬陷那么诬陷那方也抓去酷刑）被冤枉这回事不能很好避免，所以出门在外各自小心（包括男性，别入了心机女的圈套）
职场方面，男女方谁去承担家庭收入得看谁赚得多，如果需要双方都出去讨生活那就不要生，生孩子成本越来越高，教不好只会生出下一代社会问题。
婚姻方面，彩礼对比要几个孩子（相当于买孩子），如果决定不需要下一代那就不需要彩礼。回娘家一年回一方，天天回也行，在大马人手一辆车。当然如此直白难免像交易，但是现在的气象不就是那么现实吗，既然现实就大方点。男女婚前都做身体检查，婚前协议，一切摊开来讲，像交易一样。
本人也想浅浅讨论一下男女工资不平等的现象，其实取决于很多方面的考虑，因为我们没有绝对的衡量工具，业绩考察所以难以定义。比方说聘请promoter很多时候会争对性别，比方说游戏直播，OF，大多数女性有着压倒性的成绩，原因，懂的都懂（男性市场为主），请搬砖的都会偏向男性。抛开岗位和职业专长，女孩每个月来例假，马来人的礼拜，这些都是特殊群体的刚需，所以如果我是老板当然是选个没这些刚需的群体，利益最大化，风险最低考量，不存在歧视和霸凌，纯属性价比考量。如果今天我们有一套很完善的衡量体系，那么聘请，租聘，信誉这些东西得以数据化，那么就不会有那么多的歧视，主观意识。但是社会主观就是个人主观这又会有衍生的问题，这里就不考量了。
群体为什么是群体因为都有各自不同的特征，而在资本主义面前当然会歧视某些群体，好比说残障人士，女性，回族，同性恋。（如果你说有些残疾人士效率比一般人好，那只是个别案例）
回到影片，female world cup来说根本不会有人去关注，因为男性看的是男足，至于为什么女足没人看那就要问女子群体或是市场了，这没什么可以拿来参考的。就好像大多数人不会主动去看男生OF（有些市场就是比较小众）。
嘉雯说的要形式一样根本不可能，那你怎么去弥补男士对战争，建筑，和其他需要男性的方面的贡献?女性的福利多多少少占用了男性本因拥有的权力，这些怎么去弥补? default setting是因为以前的习性，就好像你说的钢琴就好, 这要回溯到发明钢琴的人是男性，自然是男性出发点，所以你想表达的是什么？如果不服你可以问问看为什么姨妈巾没有男款的。。。。。至于为什么现在女性设计不普遍，那就要求广大女性群体发挥力量去发明更多东西了。
只能说在本人的观点上她的论点还有很多漏洞可以去补足。
女性男性本质上的区别就是不同，而我们应该做的是意识到我们的不平等，互相弥补。对于践踏另一方的加害方给予惩罚就好。相对于平等本人更相信平衡，如果一件事情达不到平衡那它的终点就是悲剧。拜金的就去整型钓金龟（反正大部分男人好色）但是就不要奢求对方的忠诚了。世道坎坷，社会风气不好，坏人当道，除了提升自己，坚守自己的道德，出淤泥而不染，传播正能量之外别无他法。
关于女权或是两性平权问题你真的别再到处留言了，真的暴露智商
Michelle's restaurant's lady boss in the house! Hooray!
Tealive please sponsor Wabikong!!!!!
#Tealive is my favourite
Tealive please sponsor Wabikong!!!
If women can give enough capabilities focus in political mind rational working in physics practical subjects in long-term, they can take over the handle to make decisions for citizens and families..
If You're emotion biased person, tend to attractive on emotion subjects...
don't ruined the world with Your narrative..
Responsibilities not a funniest games things, don't kill people with Your blind eye..
嘉雯不能看太多，会越看她越吸引（嘉雯就答，请关注我的作品）
Tealive please sponsor wabikong 😂😂😂 #tealive
這個影片在討論性別平權，但 15:32預設被採訪的男生和女生是異性戀，問他們要不要在一起。我對這個企劃實在非常失望，檯面上說平等，卻毫無沒有性別平權意識
马来西亚政府不支持同性恋
不好意思让你失望了，下次别看了😂
喜欢这集
我不完全赞同women coach这个政策。如果说这个政策是为了防范女性被骚扰的问题，我觉得这个政策是治标不治本。回到来一个国家的骚扰问题越多也意味着他国的治安不是很好&教育上也出现问题等等。如果一个国家治安好的话，其实都不用women coach来解决这个问题。举个例子，新加坡🇸🇬的治安很好，所以他们不用在地铁or public transport上安排women coach。如果一直延续用这个政策，我相信这个政策以后一定会有依赖性及性别不平等的问题。若这个政策只是暂时性使用我觉得没问题，但长期使用我觉得不是明智之举。
我觉得bbk有嘉雯好幸运
希望马来西亚有多一点像嘉雯这样的youtuber
Heh < Ms Lau what do u mena on that Ha mee?
女权主义 双从标准
Did u think that woman right or patriarchy exist? In the monetary system, a lot of thing is unfair. We got low income group, middle income and top income. All this is unequally society. We never achieve equality for both. The right comes from wrong, is within the system of morality. To me, achieving equally if we all have basic needs, no poverty..
Tealive please sponsor Wabikong!!!!!
#Tealive the best
2:14 等下，怎么从观众福利变虚假引流了？😂😂😂