Bishop Barron did not help me on my way to my thinking procreation gift role or to my identity in need of having faith in union. This is because as not consenting in uncertainty of his belief to be joined in a consecrated marriage, celibate vowed to man in Christ or male female vowed to God. Hence, he did not, as he could not, keep in uncertainty of his belief on 20 July 2022 in his dialogue with Lex Fridman on "Christianity and the Catholic Church" the inseparability and qualitative equality of thinking role and having faith identity. Later he did keep this on 20 December 2023 on an immediate reference point of Pope Francis' consecrated celibate marriage on 18 December 2023 authorising the document, Fiducia Supplicans of his Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith that kept this inseparability and qualitative equality. This not keeping on 20 July 2022 by Bishop Barron was by his asserting consecrated celibate marriage is "a higher way of love" to consecrated male female marriage at You Tube podcast time 51: 34. Pope Francis on 17 June 2021 did so consent in the matters of his Vatican state embezzled by ten of its citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu, procreation role gift charity donations and the Italian Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill as an unacceptable risk of fraud on his identity in need of union. In both cases on Pope Francis' consecrated marriage exercising on 17 June 2021 an absolute power of authorisation of respectively criminal indictments in his Vatican state court and a protest note to the Italian government, these embezzlers were convicted in his Vatican state court on 18 December 2023 and this bill was defeated in the Italian Parliament on 27 October 2021.
I read the Early Church Fathers and the Didache. Although they're not Scripture, it's very relevant to our times. I'm evangelical protestant, but I use the Catholic Encyclopedia and Bishop Barron's sermons every week. I don't dare tell my fellow Protestants, because they would kick me out of church and tell me I'm "unsaved".
@@tjseaney_nope I enjoy Catholic and Orthodox prayers and other tools . Catholic leaders keep me Protestant. See when you study actual history of the Western Catholic Church you see the absurdity of the idea on Jesus having one Church
Thank you very much. You’re very helpful in focusing on certain things that Bishop Barron has said. I have listened to him for years because I happen to be Catholic. The Bible is where it all comes together. Each denomination tends to put a slant based on their individual thinking. But going back to the early church is very helpful because they weren’t distracted by what we are distracted by today. I’ve always thought that things are deeper and higher than what we just see. You see the ocean when you’re standing at the beach. But if you dive down under, you’ll see a lot more when you get deeper. Also, when you’re standing at the beach, you can look up at the stars in the night sky. But if you go up into the heavens, and you get close to the stars, and if you look through telescopes, you’ll see something much higher and more intense. So you can see the exterior basic part of these things, and you can go deeper or higher. And so it’s your choice. Because when you go deeper and higher, you can absorb more and understand more and probably love more. Thank you so much for sharing God! You are a breath of fresh air, because you don’t differentiate people you go straight to the truth, and to the word, and the understanding that you’re getting from the Holy Spirit. Most people say oh well, I’m not going to listen to that person because… Well, maybe we should just listen to everybody a little bit and take what we want and leave the rest. That is a slogan of the 12 step program people grow and change when they don’t automatically cancel things out. God bless you thank you again.
I have just learn that the way I was reading the Bible is like Origen and Bishop Barron (but not with their depth, of course). I'm glad to be in good company 🙂
While I had heard the name Origen mentioned as an early Church Father, I basically know nothing about him. Because I think Bishop Barron is one of the most effective preachers of our time, I will have more of an interest now in reading and learning about Origen since he had such an influence on him.
Bishop Barron, is great. Another person you will hear him quote often is ST. THOMAS AQUINAS. Some Protestant seminaries stopped teaching him, since many ended up becoming Catholic.
In error by groomed family members in their roles purported presumed objectively "effective" since not subjectively 'affective' given effect and affect are inseparable and qualitatively equal.
to amp, Origen was a consecrated celibate married by vows to man in Christ keeping in uncertainty of his belief its inseparability and qualitative equality with consecrated male female marriage vowed to God. Bishop Barron is not a consecrated celibate and must rely on his associating together with such keeping as he only came to associating with on 20 December 2023 with the consecrated celibate marriage of Pope Francis authorising Fiducia Supplicans, DDF, 18 December 2023.
In all charity, after reading some of the comments, truth is truth. If Origen had truth, it is to be celebrated. If he had some advanced theological opinions that were later unsettling to the magisterium, so be it. We need to seek the beauty, truth, and goodness in the efforts of our teachers who took the risk of being misunderstood or making a blunder. We cannot disregard an entire corpus of work because of some later work or hopeful speculation. Follow sound teaching and consider the hope that is before all people, that we will be forever with our God.
to Jerry Czarski the origin of 3CAD Origen's in uncertainty believing is his consent to be joined in consecrated celibate marriage in keeping in uncertainty of his belief in present moment real presence its inseparability and qualitative equality with consecrated male female marriage vowed to God as not kept by the Byzantine Emperor Justinian in the 6CAD. This was in Justinian not keeping inseparability and qualitative equality of justice thinking and charity being in uncertainty of his belief in his asserting as certain that truth is truth.
The only way the word becomes alive is to listen to the Holy Spirit in whatever form that may be. Even the devil unknowingly sometimes may speak the truth. They who have ears to hear may they hear and they who have eyes to see may they see.
Wish our priests in France would turn to the early fathers. Problem is Origen was not canonized because of conflicts that erupted 300 years after his death concerning his doctrines, so he suffers the stigma of heresy until today.
It doesn’t matter if someone is canonized in my opinion. I am a mid 70 year old very devoted Catholic and on fire. Holy spirit filled Christian. There are many saints in heaven that are not canonized. So start reading those that aren’t because they might have some amazing things to tell you. It’s the Holy Spirit. And yes, the canonized are fine but there’s plenty more out there.
to MichaelGmusic, until Pope Francis from 2013 keeping in uncertainty of his belief the inseparability and qualitative equality of his thinking gift and his having faith need on the reference point through very few, but including Origen, of this keeping by Mary at Lk 1:29-45 and Mt1:24.
From my understanding, he was anathematized. The distinction to be made is that you don’t have to believe his false doctrine to appreciate his approach to scripture. It would be similar to liking Aristotle for his contributions to philosophy and also to theology. Aristotle wasn’t a Catholic and you can appreciate his approach. Hope that helps.
@@tjseaney_ Thanks. I just wanted to know if the Catholic Church had restored him. I will read something by him, I don´t really have any prejudices even if the writer is not a christian like Plato or Aristotle. And he seems interesting
Bishop Barron’s Sunday Sermons himself on that he wasn’t very literal. He did explain that in more detail. He knows there are some people not in heaven. He’s not an idiot he’s extremely intelligent actually. But he realized that he hit a button with some people however, he wants to believe that most people go to heaven, don’t we all?
@@oliverclark5604 word's only words nothing substantial at all. What is the logos of God. Can you define it and it's difference to the Greek philosophical concept.of logos.
Origen is not a Father of the Church. Origen was a good man who went to certain extremes hence he has never held the title of a Father of the Church. Modernists, like the Bishop, usurp him in order to give Sacred Scripture a merely "poetic" twist and to justify their "reasonable hope that hell" is empty nonsense. This error know as apokatastasis is nothing more than pantheism in Christian clothes.
He’s a good decent guy. He’s highly intellectual… He and Jordan Peterson are friends. They’re very similar. Neither of them loves themselves. They love others and they use their intellect to share.
Thank you very much. You’re very helpful in focusing on certain things that Bishop Barron has said. I have listened to him for years because I happen to be Catholic. The Bible is where it all comes together. Each denomination tends to put a slant based on their individual thinking. But going back to the early church is very helpful because they weren’t distracted by what we are distracted by today. I’ve always thought that things are deeper and higher than what we just see. You see the ocean when you’re standing at the beach. But if you dive down under, you’ll see a lot more when you get deeper. Also, when you’re standing at the beach, you can look up at the stars in the night sky. But if you go up into the heavens, and you get close to the stars, and if you look through telescopes, you’ll see something much higher and more intense. So you can see the exterior basic part of these things, and you can go deeper or higher. And so it’s your choice. Because when you go deeper and higher, you can absorb more and understand more and probably love more. Thank you so much for sharing God! You are a breath of fresh air, because you don’t differentiate people you go straight to the truth, and to the word, and the understanding that you’re getting from the Holy Spirit. Most people say oh well, I’m not going to listen to that person because… Well, maybe we should just listen to everybody a little bit and take what we want and leave the rest. That is a slogan of the 12 step program people grow and change when they don’t automatically cancel things out. God bless you thank you again.
One cannot "be Catholic" as an identity in need of union. Instead, one can do catholicism as a procreation gift role. This groomed inversion is for economic advantage by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud for families of the groomers who are 'familyist' family members in diseased identities grooming their psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members with this occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, economic advantage with an inducement of falsely purported "higher vocation" status of, or association with consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ to consecrated male female marriage vowed to God.
Bishop Barron helped me very much on my way to faith.
I just got baptized this year.
Bishop Barron did not help me on my way to my thinking procreation gift role or to my identity in need of having faith in union.
This is because as not consenting in uncertainty of his belief to be joined in a consecrated marriage, celibate vowed to man in Christ or male female vowed to God.
Hence, he did not, as he could not, keep in uncertainty of his belief on 20 July 2022 in his dialogue with Lex Fridman on "Christianity and the Catholic Church" the inseparability and qualitative equality of thinking role and having faith identity.
Later he did keep this on 20 December 2023 on an immediate reference point of Pope Francis' consecrated celibate marriage on 18 December 2023 authorising the document, Fiducia Supplicans of his Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith that kept this inseparability and qualitative equality.
This not keeping on 20 July 2022 by Bishop Barron was by his asserting consecrated celibate marriage is "a higher way of love" to consecrated male female marriage at You Tube podcast time 51: 34.
Pope Francis on 17 June 2021 did so consent in the matters of his Vatican state embezzled by ten of its citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu, procreation role gift charity donations and the Italian Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill as an unacceptable risk of fraud on his identity in need of union.
In both cases on Pope Francis' consecrated marriage exercising on 17 June 2021 an absolute power of authorisation of respectively criminal indictments in his Vatican state court and a protest note to the Italian government, these embezzlers were convicted in his Vatican state court on 18 December 2023 and this bill was defeated in the Italian Parliament on 27 October 2021.
I read the Early Church Fathers and the Didache. Although they're not Scripture, it's very relevant to our times.
I'm evangelical protestant, but I use the Catholic Encyclopedia and Bishop Barron's sermons every week.
I don't dare tell my fellow Protestants, because they would kick me out of church and tell me I'm "unsaved".
Ever think about being Catholic?
Might be time to find another Church 👍
@@tjseaney_nope I enjoy Catholic and Orthodox prayers and other tools . Catholic leaders keep me Protestant. See when you study actual history of the Western Catholic Church you see the absurdity of the idea on Jesus having one Church
@@tjseaney_nope Cardinal Cupuch at the DNC was a great example of how most non Catholic see your Church. Void of Jesus
@@dallasbrat81 So are you saying there shouldn't be one church? And everyone should be part of their "own" church?
God Bless Bishop Barron!
TJ Seaney, great video keep it up
Thanks, will do!
Amen.
Thank you very much. You’re very helpful in focusing on certain things that Bishop Barron has said.
I have listened to him for years because I happen to be Catholic.
The Bible is where it all comes together.
Each denomination tends to put a slant based on their individual thinking.
But going back to the early church is very helpful because they weren’t distracted by what we are distracted by today.
I’ve always thought that things are deeper and higher than what we just see.
You see the ocean when you’re standing at the beach. But if you dive down under, you’ll see a lot more when you get deeper.
Also, when you’re standing at the beach, you can look up at the stars in the night sky.
But if you go up into the heavens, and you get close to the stars, and if you look through telescopes, you’ll see something much higher and more intense.
So you can see the exterior basic part of these things, and you can go deeper or higher.
And so it’s your choice. Because when you go deeper and higher, you can absorb more and understand more and probably love more.
Thank you so much for sharing God!
You are a breath of fresh air, because you don’t differentiate people you go straight to the truth, and to the word, and the understanding that you’re getting from the Holy Spirit.
Most people say oh well, I’m not going to listen to that person because… Well, maybe we should just listen to everybody a little bit and take what we want and leave the rest.
That is a slogan of the 12 step program people grow and change when they don’t automatically cancel things out.
God bless you thank you again.
joolz, yes, the AA 12 Steps keeps in uncertainty of belief the inseparability and qualitative equality of thinking doing and having faith being.
I have just learn that the way I was reading the Bible is like Origen and Bishop Barron (but not with their depth, of course). I'm glad to be in good company 🙂
Barron contradicts Origen and both are in error.
While I had heard the name Origen mentioned as an early Church Father, I basically know nothing about him. Because I think Bishop Barron is one of the most effective preachers of our time, I will have more of an interest now in reading and learning about Origen since he had such an influence on him.
Bishop Barron, is great. Another person you will hear him quote often is ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.
Some Protestant seminaries stopped teaching him, since many ended up becoming Catholic.
He was canonized as he took Jesus' words to "cut off" the body parts that trouble you, a little TOO literally, yes you get it
Beware what you read, you might become a catholic, quite a good idea, I believe.
In error by groomed family members in their roles purported presumed objectively "effective" since not subjectively 'affective' given effect and affect are inseparable and qualitatively equal.
to amp, Origen was a consecrated celibate married by vows to man in Christ keeping in uncertainty of his belief its inseparability and qualitative equality with consecrated male female marriage vowed to God.
Bishop Barron is not a consecrated celibate and must rely on his associating together with such keeping as he only came to associating with on 20 December 2023 with the consecrated celibate marriage of Pope Francis authorising Fiducia Supplicans, DDF, 18 December 2023.
In all charity, after reading some of the comments, truth is truth. If Origen had truth, it is to be celebrated. If he had some advanced theological opinions that were later unsettling to the magisterium, so be it. We need to seek the beauty, truth, and goodness in the efforts of our teachers who took the risk of being misunderstood or making a blunder. We cannot disregard an entire corpus of work because of some later work or hopeful speculation. Follow sound teaching and consider the hope that is before all people, that we will be forever with our God.
to Jerry Czarski the origin of 3CAD Origen's in uncertainty believing is his consent to be joined in consecrated celibate marriage in keeping in uncertainty of his belief in present moment real presence its inseparability and qualitative equality with consecrated male female marriage vowed to God as not kept by the Byzantine Emperor Justinian in the 6CAD.
This was in Justinian not keeping inseparability and qualitative equality of justice thinking and charity being in uncertainty of his belief in his asserting as certain that truth is truth.
The only way the word becomes alive is to listen to the Holy Spirit in whatever form that may be. Even the devil unknowingly sometimes may speak the truth. They who have ears to hear may they hear and they who have eyes to see may they see.
Totally agree.
Wish our priests in France would turn to the early fathers. Problem is Origen was not canonized because of conflicts that erupted 300 years after his death concerning his doctrines, so he suffers the stigma of heresy until today.
It doesn’t matter if someone is canonized in my opinion. I am a mid 70 year old very devoted Catholic and on fire. Holy spirit filled Christian. There are many saints in heaven that are not canonized. So start reading those that aren’t because they might have some amazing things to tell you. It’s the Holy Spirit. And yes, the canonized are fine but there’s plenty more out there.
to MichaelGmusic, until Pope Francis from 2013 keeping in uncertainty of his belief the inseparability and qualitative equality of his thinking gift and his having faith need on the reference point through very few, but including Origen, of this keeping by Mary at Lk 1:29-45 and Mt1:24.
But when the fullness of time had come God sent forth his Son … Gal 4:4 … I am the Lord in its time I will hasten it Isaiah 60:22b
Wasn´t Origen anathemized because of his doctrine of apokastasis? Or has the Catholic Church lifted that anathema? I hope so.
From my understanding, he was anathematized. The distinction to be made is that you don’t have to believe his false doctrine to appreciate his approach to scripture. It would be similar to liking Aristotle for his contributions to philosophy and also to theology. Aristotle wasn’t a Catholic and you can appreciate his approach. Hope that helps.
@@tjseaney_ Thanks. I just wanted to know if the Catholic Church had restored him. I will read something by him, I don´t really have any prejudices even if the writer is not a christian like Plato or Aristotle. And he seems interesting
I don’t interpret scripture at all, I think scripture interprets me 😂
Bishop Baron has declared no one will go to hell. This is why Origen is not canonized he believed that falsehood. Interesting
Bishop Barron’s Sunday Sermons himself on that he wasn’t very literal. He did explain that in more detail. He knows there are some people not in heaven. He’s not an idiot he’s extremely intelligent actually. But he realized that he hit a button with some people however, he wants to believe that most people go to heaven, don’t we all?
Revelation of the theological assumptions. Its the transformation of our hearts or inclinations is paramount.
Am sceptical about revelation from church fathers very close to gnosis not the logos kind.
Plural thinking and singular heart in keeping in uncertainty of belief their inseparability and qualitative equality.
@@oliverclark5604 definitely simplicity is not your Forte
@@frederickanderson1860 Humble simplicity keeps in uncertainty. Proud Forte separates.
@@oliverclark5604 word's only words nothing substantial at all. What is the logos of God. Can you define it and it's difference to the Greek philosophical concept.of logos.
Check out a video called “modernism” by bishop sanborn.
Origen is not a Father of the Church. Origen was a good man who went to certain extremes hence he has never held the title of a Father of the Church. Modernists, like the Bishop, usurp him in order to give Sacred Scripture a merely "poetic" twist and to justify their "reasonable hope that hell" is empty nonsense. This error know as apokatastasis is nothing more than pantheism in Christian clothes.
Origen was not a “Doctor” of the church bit he was one of the “Fathers” …. Origen was not canonized a saint because he mutilated his own body.
This man loves himself complete opposite of the simple beauty of Jesus
He’s a good decent guy. He’s highly intellectual… He and Jordan Peterson are friends. They’re very similar. Neither of them loves themselves. They love others and they use their intellect to share.
Thank you very much. You’re very helpful in focusing on certain things that Bishop Barron has said.
I have listened to him for years because I happen to be Catholic.
The Bible is where it all comes together.
Each denomination tends to put a slant based on their individual thinking.
But going back to the early church is very helpful because they weren’t distracted by what we are distracted by today.
I’ve always thought that things are deeper and higher than what we just see.
You see the ocean when you’re standing at the beach. But if you dive down under, you’ll see a lot more when you get deeper.
Also, when you’re standing at the beach, you can look up at the stars in the night sky.
But if you go up into the heavens, and you get close to the stars, and if you look through telescopes, you’ll see something much higher and more intense.
So you can see the exterior basic part of these things, and you can go deeper or higher.
And so it’s your choice. Because when you go deeper and higher, you can absorb more and understand more and probably love more.
Thank you so much for sharing God!
You are a breath of fresh air, because you don’t differentiate people you go straight to the truth, and to the word, and the understanding that you’re getting from the Holy Spirit.
Most people say oh well, I’m not going to listen to that person because… Well, maybe we should just listen to everybody a little bit and take what we want and leave the rest.
That is a slogan of the 12 step program people grow and change when they don’t automatically cancel things out.
God bless you thank you again.
One cannot "be Catholic" as an identity in need of union. Instead, one can do catholicism as a procreation gift role.
This groomed inversion is for economic advantage by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud for families of the groomers who are 'familyist' family members in diseased identities grooming their psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members with this occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, economic advantage with an inducement of falsely purported "higher vocation" status of, or association with consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ to consecrated male female marriage vowed to God.