Gnome Warlock the community is the most toxic of any other. I just came across a hank squad with 3 overleveled phantoms in catacombs. People like that are who killed the game
You've never played for honor on PC then. also, you're invading..its kinda up to them how they want to play so either invade reds, don't invade, or get good enough to not worry about gank squads, gravity is still op, that's a bug they haven't fixed so.... also hank squad sells humanity and humanity accessories so idk why you hate them...
"base game" that's BS tho; you needed all the DLC to get the upgrade; if you didn't you had to pay. source: have base game since release; didn't buy DLCs cause game was shit; I didn't get the upgrade
@@hmaster24 just correcting facts; couldn't care less about the upgrade lmfao; I couldn't be arsed playing the original; an updated form wouldn't change my views on it haha; but yeah nah; just wanted to correct that misinformation. gonna have to give bethesda less credit than they deserve; anyone giving bethesda undeserved credit; you know I'm bound to be around to rip it away
I know this is a joke but... That quite literally *is* a big reason why a lot of bugs aren't fixed... It's because the community has come to view them as "features." Anytime there's a remaster or remake of anything, whether it be a movie, or game, or what have you, the creators have to walk a very precarious tightrope of trying to revamp the product, but not changing it so much that it alienates fans of the original. Inevitably, there will always be a large chunk of people that cry because "It's not like the original!" and therefore will shit on it for that. Despite anything being a bug, changing it from the original is what will make people complain. And then there's videos such as this one, that shit on it for not being different enough. It's a situation that the creators are damned if they do, and damned if they don't. Take note of like any remake of any classic movie ever, and there's a very high chance people just automatically shit on it, regardless of how it actually is. The same effect is happening with remasters and remakes, like Dark Souls: Remastered and Warcraft: Reforged. It's virtually a coin toss whether any fanbase will accept a remaster/make of anything.
@@user-vf3cb7vk8z "They half-way fixed this one thing that really had little to do with your comment or anything really so this entirely disproves you." Jesus...
@@user-vf3cb7vk8z They didn't actually go in and specifically fix that bug. The way the bug was created was a side effect of something else they fixed, and the bug just got took with it. Yes, they "half way" fixed it because they didn't mean to actually do that, it just was a coincidence; And it's theoretically still possible if you get it absolutely frame perfect, but humanly implausible.
@@user-vf3cb7vk8z I quite literally never mentioned the word "speedrunners," or any variation thereof, until this very sentence. So I don't know why you think I'm saying they're "pandering to speedrunners." I was making a general statement about the community as a whole that would share that sentiment, not just speedrunners. Maybe go back and read, and actually take a moment to think about what's being said before you just go spewing out random replies.
Csúb - Az Űrmedve I think there was copyright issues so they cant (or i'd be too much work), but theres a ps3 emulator in the works so that's the best your going to get.
You still didn't deserve to pay a high retail value for it though. At most, you should've paid $25-30 USD for a release day copy. $40 is reserved for a very good remastered like Halo Anniversary.
Or play Switch for free on desktop. How long does it take to drop a #2? DS1 is free on desktop also. $25 for a digital copy game? Lol. $40? Dear lord..
@@DaBonkinator If it's not on disc, then it's worthless to the consumer. Digital games = freeware. Digital games are even easier to share than physical. Consider it a donation to the less fortunate who can't throw money around due the high cost of basic needs. The beauty of digital file sharing.
@@maxmazza2987for me the cheapest one would be 500 hundred moneys lmao i live in a porr country for context it is much more in count to make a time travel machine.
@@Tasorius Blame Bandai Namco, not From. From had literally nothing to do with this "remaster". Bandai Namco paid a Chinese company (Virtuos) to do this "remaster".
@@Tasorius because from software doesn't control it's store pages Bandai Namco does because they're the publisher. That's just common knowledge and common sense.
@@Capnsensible80 There was no real reason not to just hide it, instead of removing it completely... It's nothing less than sacrilege... I'm also a bit worried about the next time I have to switch to a different computer or something, that it will become impossible to re-install it. I have it on an external hard drive, but I don't know how that works...
It’s sad that at least for the pc version of this it could have been a patch and instead the people that owned the game have to pay $20 for it it’s $40 for console which is not worth it in the slightest
Stop chatting shit the lot of you. You fucking PC gamer's think everything shouls be given to you for free. I'm now 105 hrs into the game on PS4 pro and it's a brilliant game. I played Demon Souls nearly 9 years ago and bought Dark souls 1 day of release on PS3. And for £28 for a PS4 game that I've put over 100 hrs and still haven't finished as I'm going for the plat it's money well spent. Why don't you lot actually go out and buy and play some of these games before you comment and something you know fuck all about. And before the PC virgins start saying "PC master race" or "console peasant" I have a PS4 pro Nintendo switch a macbook pro and a Gaming PC. And trust me it costs more money being a gamer on console. And this gen I've bought most of the new releases on PS4 as the line up has been brilliant. And I got sick of the constant stream of buggy broken games being ported over to PC. Anyways by looks of it this Dark Souls release was a console remaster and honestly don't know why PC gamer's would of bought it as the PC version a few years back had a improvement in graphics back then. And all the logic "o I should get the game for free as I own it already" does that include me also as I own it on PS3 or what about the players who own it on 360. If everybody had that line of though there wouldn't be any money coming in to pay for these game. And with videos and most of these comment it's going to put From off making remaster of Demon Souls and make the online alive again. so stop Moaning everybody wow you getting DS1 for $20 with better frame rate graphics dedicated servers and increased online numbers in co-op. So how about support From Software with the hopes they will make a remaster of Demon Souls. And before you reply to what I said look for somebody that has a lets play of the last gen version before later patches and compare somewhere like Blighttown.
Demon's Souls remake definitely needed the quality of life changes that later Souls games added. The AI was also terrible and the bosses underwhelmed, for the most part. The developers could have made it more of a challenge.
very true, ive only played the remaster. and i find it very clunky and boring. im so into the lore and have watched hour to two hour long videos about the lore. but its just so boring to me. but i fuckin loved demons souls on ps5
@@vladymartinez1232 Good question. I never said i gave a shit, but if you wanna play online then you have to get the remaster, because i've yet to find a working crack for any illegitimate versions.
As someone who has only played the remastered version, I didn't know that descending a ladder wasn't supposed to be so bumpy. I just assumed that it was supposed to be like that, as the Chosen Undead was hitting every rung to control their fall.
Interestingly, there are cloth physics on armor... ON THE ENEMIES. Look at the silver knight cape, it has physics, but when the player wears the armor, it doesn't. I don't know how they could mess up this badly
"They added a bonfire next to Vamos" that's only a good thing once you have the lord vessel. If you sit on that God forsaken bonfire, without the lordvessel, I'm so sorry. Its almost im-fucking possible to get out. Almost.
Just deleted a character the other day after getting drunk and making this mistake the night before. I know how to make it out, and I've done it a fair few times before, but it's so aggravating that I'd rather just start over half the time. Lol
I shit you not I was in a call with my friends and sat at this bonfire, thought it would be an easy way out right? Spent the next 6 fucking hours trying to escape, spending 2 finding a strategy to avoid those skeleton wheel looking fuckers, I accidentally Killed pinwheel then left and arrived back at firelink. Never want to do that again😅
You guys are exaggerating the climb out. I mean its supposed to be a challenging climb but it's completely doable. Even if you sit at tomb of the giants bonfire and then realize you can't beat the level yet, the climb out isn't that bad.
@@innerface. yes as! Implement changes to the HUD and menus so they'll match more towards the style and convenience of 3. Still be the same game as 1, but how cool would it be to go to the bonfire and see a preview of each area before fast-travelling?
@Onigiri Otaku i love Bloodborne but the menus were annoying and while a good game doesnt feel like a souls game, still great. but lets be real its not Bloodborne Kart so it doesnt matter
15:38 that's entirely intentional. Vamos doesn't have flesh or vocal chords so he doesn't speak normally. He's either using magic or he is literally vibrating bones to produce sound.
to think 3 years later, this lad makes a mod that fixes the game and adds so much more content after calling it trash and getting the obligatory "alright, then do better" response... ....and he did
@@tostadorafuriosa69 he wanted to make a multiplayer mod on old halo maps with custom maps, so when he was making content for the mod he went and fixed everything that was wrong with it. Check his recent vids
@@angelosd2 yeah then the server inferno runs ip banned all of my accounts because i said FF14 is for fat chicks, that "enward" was 90% of my vocab, and "sup my gravelords" and they thought i was a neonazi based on that. none of the rules were broken btw. I wasnt warned. they just.... dont like any form of humor in #general chat. literally didnt ban evade. didnt have the chance. I originally thought only my main was effected. but nope. 1 button press cascaded through everything i own from alts to vpns.
If I were to play this, I would play it offline. I’ve learned enough from Dark Souls 3’s High Wall of Lothric that people will go through the entire game to be able to ruin your experience.
I see where you're coming from but really rather than multiplayer the only 2 points of being in human form is to boost your bonfires or if you want to do the PVE invasions where one of the AI will invade you but then again that's just my opinion and everyone has their own opinions
@@jconley2795 yea its wack, he was also using the mask of the son and the gravelord sword. I was only level 5 tho :( that means this dude grinded thru the catacombs just to troll low level players.
@@jconley2795 yea its wack, he was also using the mask of the son and the gravelord sword. I was only level 5 tho :( that means this dude grinded thru the catacombs just to troll low level players.
Piriph oh that’s wha I’ve been worry about. I wanna play the full dark souls series after I’ve finished BloodBorne. And I wanted to know if it would be okay to buy the remaster because it would be my first time.
I hate how companies do this. Rerelease the same game, do fuck all, maybe add a bit of lighting, then throw it out there and expect people to buy it claiming it is remastered when it isn't. I am not wholly against remasters if they are done right, and there plenty of good examples of it being done right. I just hate these lazy asshats that throw out the word remaster without actually remastering anything.
If you apply new shaders, textures and set it up to 60fps 1080p, yes, you can. A remaster needs only to be in visual terms by definition. A good one? Nope
I feel loke no-one is more qualified to criticize DSR than Inferno, considering he single handedly fixed all of the bugs and rebalanced the game. This man is a coding god.
Now that the Demon Souls remake happened, I honestly wouldn't be upset at all if they decided to do a Dark Souls remake, where they gave it the love and effort it deserves. I would not mind buying the game again, if they did that.
@shortythecat As far as I am concerned if you completely change the art style of a game and change all the music it isn't demon's souls anymore. Miyazaki and From also was not involved so I don't care for it.
@shortythecat DeS remake is fucking amazing, and this is coming from a person who bought their PS3 because of DeS. The only downside is that they didn't actually add the cut content which defeats the purpose of a remake imo
@@JKSmith-qs2ii I love that all you fuckers are complaining that DS1 was the same game, but here you are saying DeS isn't valid because they changed the way it looks. You people.
It'd be nice to play a version of Dark Souls II where literally walking works properly and the lighting engine is in the game. You could do a pretty drastic remaster with little complaints since the community shits on it so hard already.
Boggles the mind how the same company that released Scholar of The First Sin released DSR. At least Dark Souls 2 finally does something better than the original! Great ass video btw
I don't think they did. Scholar was made by From and I think it is a good remaster. I might be the only one who thinks that, but still. DSR was made by QLOC. A company known for ...under average... remasters.
Ds2 was broken on the ps4 for the first year. Weapons would brake after only a few hits making it unplayable. So ds2 was far from perfect, now it's patched it plays wonderfully but it didn't at first.
Something in common with DSR and Scholar was that at some point things they promised was suppose to be a patch in the future, instead they ended up selling the game back to its customers with the minimal improvements. What I liked about Scholar was that it changed enemy placements, for veterans it just spices things up a bit (though I didn't understand why there was so many petrified people all around Drangleic randomly). I liked what they did with Scholar, incorporating the DLC's a bit better so you had to find keys around the world rather than just being given to you because you bought them. DSR I find rather insulting, least DS2 to Scholar there was noticeable differences in areas (lighting and effects predominantly from what I remember) but shown from the vid anyways I can't tell apart the original to remaster really
The ash lake music doesn't seem to have been a bug, it only happens the first time you go there, I think it was done that way to add atmosphere, since the music starts playing when you look at the sky and witness the grandeur!
"Walking down a hill can kill you." That happened to me once at that exact location 12:55. I was so confused, thought I might have been unknowingly poisoned, and it led to at least ten more attempts at that frustrating location. I think it was maybe my second attempt. I wonder if some asshole at From put that bug in there because he thought it was funny.
12:13 I think Ornstein's charging attack is probably a recycled move from The False King in Demon's Souls. I remember the EXACT same glitch happening with his charge. haha
There are several typos in the video. That one is not only not the first instance of a typo, but it's not even the first instance of that specific typo. What's worse is that every instance in the video where the word "too" is supposed to be displayed, it is misspelled as "to."
Rudy Leon Dark Souls 2 in general is the weakest of the trilogy in my opinion. It’s not a bad game by any means but I just enjoyed DS1 and DS3 way more. But some love it so give it a shot. Scholar in particular is extremely long if you complete all the DLC
I remember a time when Remaster meant to re-master a game. The devs have the chance to go back and improve the game that they made. Then companies started to remaster games that have only been out for like a year for double the money. And then they just started to Improve the Graphics. And now their just releasing the same game but worse.
TBF it's not the dev's that do this it's the publishers. It's not common for the devs of the original game to work on remasters of their older games. Remasters for the most part or outsourced to smaller studios.
@@jameson7276 Meh, not really much point. Pirated games tend not to work with mods and technically besides the mods, remastered IS better in every respect (to my knowledge, i got into souls after the remaster was released. Not only that I cant find a decent download link for it.
@@tannerteddo when companies make remasters of old games, a lot of things happen: it gets a lot of publicity (more people interested = more money), it attracts customers that only want high quality games and that do not want to suffer with garbage graphics (= more money), the fact that they are making a remaster allows them to charge extra money regardless of whether or not they deserve it (less effort = more money) even if they didn’t raise the price, the game would still have more sales than the original.
I agree. The original bonfire seemed more mystical. And it made sense from a lore perspective. But it’s only present in dark souls 1 so they probably wanted to have some continuity with the other games.
Can't forget the "Nitto stuck on geometry" issue where he will literally be unable to walk away from his spawn location unless you kite him further into his boss room... Also Pinwheel is still treated like a boss.... So that's still broken (joke)
@@elcotonex9016 I didnt know it was a glitch i thought it was just a fucking broken move, i have a love hate relationship with O&S, its so fun if the RNG works, otherwise you get ganked by the broken charges of both O&S or just fucked by smoughs awful hit box, or they both just stick to each other and do nothing. But if RNG serves you well and they split up a bit and come in and out to attack its an incredible fight
the result depends on how steep the hill is, how hard the ground is, if there's anything that could be tripped over, and if the ground is wet enough for you to slip.
Why are you comparing real life physics in a game where you have to jump into an abyss and not sustain damage because of a spooky magic ring to kill 4 ghostly assholes?
This glitch actually happened to me once. I was running down the stairs to the Ariamis painting and suddenly died, very confused as to how since i wasn't invaded and i went from full hp to dead.
Ffs, this video is just over 6 years old and that 'counter argument' against QoL still irritates me because people are STILL using it to this day for EVERYTHING. If QoL makes the game easier, than the difficulty was from jank and poor design, not genuine challenge. So it should be fixed so that players get a better experience overall, even if it comes at the cost of 'game no hard no more'.
I think its hilarious that people think DS:R was marketed towards people who played DS3 but didn't play the original... When my copy of DS3 for the XBONE came with a *free code for DS1.*
Simply put, its the pricing and removing DS PTD Edition. I knew it would be some textures, framerate fixes and bug fixes. But $20 for existing owners? Its ludicrous. CD Projekt Red released Witcher 1 and 2 Enhanced editions which added proper bug fixes, cleaned up animations, new gear, new quests, new characters, new difficulties and this was all free for people who had already bought the earlier versions. To be fair, these weren't complete engine swaps, that is likely why DSR is so expensive. That and Bandai feeling they can milk their braindead Souls fan base. If they went all out and fixed Lost Izalith, Bed of Chaos, added improved rolling, cloth physics, restored some cut content and maybe even some new stuff, then people would be a lot happier with the game and price. As it stands, you're getting fleeced.
If they fixed Lost Izalith, Bed of Chaos, restored cut content and/or added new stuff it would make the game a remake instead of a remaster, which in my honest opinion would be worth the full $40 price tag even for existing owners of DS PTD, myself included. Though in it's current state it's nothing but a cash grab for PC players.
FromSoft did not develop the Remaster. QLOC did not have the rights (nor would I want a third party making significant changes to the base game) to add any assets to the game.
Let's be clear: Bandai was right that they can milk the Souls fan base. Remember, DS3 came out 3 years ago. People are thirsty for new Dark Souls so DS:R was easy money. I wouldn't be surprised if they did Bloodborne Remastered (now for PC and Xbone) in a year or two.
If I could summarize this into a few sentences: “You see this. This is garbage. So I shall now devote my own soul to making a true remaster, by making this as cursed as physically possible.”
Not really. He means that now, all the invaders are either giantdads, or another variation of low level, but using a +5 chaos weapon with HR getting one shot lagstabs. No-one is trying to be unique or have fun. It's just "look, I'm a twink build" and that's it
And that's the problem with this remaster. All of the veterans know exactly what is op, what min/max to do whereas in a new souls release, everyone is experimenting. A lot of people are here to just wreck new players, but by doing so, will kill the game. Because why would a new player stick around when an invader is just going to one shot them with a +5 chaos HR lagstab and then taunt them because they're a twink pvp build and the host isn't.
All of us right? thats why im pvping at 130 with an optimized build like the majority of vets from the first game. I swear this guys fan base just complains and cries about everything. Im remembering why i unsubbed.
People are far too easy on mistakes FromSoft make. Yes, pretty much every souls game is objectively a great game, far above most of its peers, but that doesn't mean we can't call out mistakes and call out bad decisions. Nothing is perfect, we can't get things to be perfect unless we say what is wrong.
It is a bug and it is pretty funny. People just like to think they're all high and mighty when they nit pick games and list little bugs that don't matter at all.
To be honest, seeing the changes they've made, this seems more like something they should just release as a patch for the original rather than a $40 game... pretty much the only reason I would get this is because the original crashes every 2 minutes on my PC, but that was something THEY SHOULD HAVE FIXED YEARS AGO AND IT SHOULDN'T BE SOMETHING WE HAVE TO PAY FOR
Doctorzzim (1: sorry for my bad english 2: sorry for the big comment) I am crazy I would said it in their face. Shurely, they've done a good work in some aspects of the game like remaking the effects of spells, but there's a Lot of things that they SHOULD have done and you know that, more... Important things you know? Things that we really needed, things that we really ASKED FOR. They didn't fixed MOSTLY of the bugs (actually they fixed the "small" bugs, the big fucking messy bugs like chain backstabs or the Pricilla's corruption bug are still there) + the new bugs, game mecanics are still broken, and it somehow looks even worse than the original at "some" parts. They should have improved the original game and added new features, they haven't done a real good job in none. The "mecanics" they added like the "coop scaling" doesn't work properly. They had ALL the time in the world and seems like their job is at half.
Doctorzzim The port thing is just a joke :v and why do you defend so much this clearly bad remaster? It's because the GAME is good? Yes, Dark Souls is great, but not this remaster, definitelly not worth of 40 Bucks (or in my case 180 Bucks... Yeah, Brazil sucks dick)
@@erehh9817 But the joke was about the fact that they are selling it again without actually doing much, and charging too much for it. But I wouldn't have cared about that for a second if they didn't remove Prepare to Die from Steam, and even kept the Prepare to Die page and put the remaster file there... They could even have done the thing Bethesda did, where they hid the original Skyrim on steam, but it was still possible to buy it, because they didn't remove it... (It also helped that I got the new version of Skyrim for free because I owned the original, and that it was actually an improvement that didn't take anything away from the game). A company doing worse than Bethesda in that way really says something...
@@energyzerchanell I guess Bethesda saw my comment and realized that someone thought another company was scummier than then, so they couldn't stand it... Because last time I clicked the "find more DLC" button (the only way to find it before, unless you has the link), it was still there, but now it wasn't. Skyrim Special Edition is good though, and not trash, unlike the Dark Souls remaster turd. I don't think anything good is going come from that company anymore anyways, because like Bethesda, they seem to be simplifying things, and someone said there won't be another Dark Souls...
What a time to be alive when a mod you made for OG Dark Souls: Prepare to Die - vis a vi your most recent video - is better than Dark Souls: Remastered and revitalized the online portion. Why the fuck.... doesn't FROMSOFT hire you?
Why would they? He did a bunch of work for free and not even a fifth of the player base of DSRe is going to download some fan made bullshit when they didn't have a problem with what From gave them.
@@NottherealLucifer *fan made quality content when they didn't have a problem with the bullshit From gave them I know I'm a year late, but I fixed it for you.
I'm actually really enjoying the remaster, but mostly for the co-op with the revitalized community. Co-op in the original was a bit disappointing (especially in recent years because very few people were playing). But now there is no shortage of people willing to drop their signs or pick up yours.
I actually never did any of the pvp covenants in the original, so I decided to try out being a forest invader. Put on my ring, took 20 minutes to actually get summoned, and was greeted by a full 2 summon gank squad, just standing around the invasion point. What a great community.
The reason most people weren’t great at the pvp is because anyone playing through normally instead of twinking is already at a disadvantage... still can be fun though when you run into someone who you semi match with...
Ah the Ornstein charge bug. Happens to me so often that it takes most of the fun out of the fight. All of a sudden I'm just hit by a guy that teleports
That's a bug? I thought it was just one of his moves? That damn fast charge fucked me over in so many O&S fights. Every time I tried to attack smough ornstein would just zoom from across the room and hit me.
Do you think this game should be free for PC players that bought the prior game and it's dlc on Steam? Skyrim SE did this, I think From/Bamco should do the same.
If they truly "remastered" DS, like how InfernoPlus compared Halo 2 to Halo 2 Anniversary, I would be okay with paying some money for it. That is obviously, NOT, the case here.
Not a remaster, not a re-make, just a re-release. Also Red Faction Guerrilla is getting remastered and it's free for owners of the old version, thanks From Soft...
Why are you thanking FromSoft? They didn't release (That would be Bandai) the remaster or make it (QLOC). They are focused on Armored Core Reboot and whatever Shadows Die Twice ends up being (probably a new tenchu).
its not a re-release, a re-release implies a re-issuing of the original game either on it's original platform (IE: Greatest Hits, Platinum Hits or Complete Edition) or on a new system with no changes except for the standard resolution bump or framerate bump. This game was marketed as a remaster, which is taking the original assets and revamping them for a new platform, which is what Bandai Namco did, except they did a shitty job overall.
rereleases and ports often revamp graphics, a remaster requires remaking all graphical or audio assets, and a remake is when you recreate a game from the ground up.
I like only being able to warp to certain bonfires and having to traverse certain areas again. I also like the fact that you can’t warp until you get the lord vessel
Dark Souls, 2011: Graphics painstakingly tweaked by the original developers to deliver a rich, cohesive visual atmosphere. Remastered, 2018: Graphics ported to a new engine and rushed to completion by an outsourced development team on a budget. The results speak for themselves.
There seem to be issues with the specular channel. In some places, the color of your character bleeds onto the environment. Also, using magic shield buff seem to be applied into the specular channel and your shield will glow only when light is reflecting. Letofski also created a couple lists of bugs, in case you're curios. And someone needs to remember these assholes that you're not getting a 50% discount for the game if you already own it on Steam. The 50% "discount" puts it at $20(or euro), which is the FULL price of the original DS1.
Damn, I just happened to rewatch this after watching ymfah's "Bow" Only run in DSR, and its kinda crazy how many of the bugs are still around and exploitable. Even poopwalk.
Let's be honest, some bugs and exploits are really fun and make the game much more interesting. I only play DS for the poopwalk so im glad it will never get patched out
@@fnn6339 I use the brightness menu dupe glitch, but only for buying shit. I don't want to kill the same baked-naked dude over and over just to buy ONE tit shard
Maybe if they rebuilt it from the ground up in the bloodborne or dark souls 3 engines, while keeping the gameplay the same as DS1 then it'd be worth. What we got was a low-effort patch that costs money to install.
I'm not. I knew exactly what it would be the moment it was announced, it's mostly just a grab for money from people wanting nostalgia or who never had a chance to play DS1 when there was a decent player population and want to experience it. It wasn't going to be some masterful rework, but only a cheaply produced graphics update. Did all that stop me from buying the game and enjoying it? No. Inferno is just salty his modding capability is gone within the rework and has to make it sound shit for everyone else.
Honestly I'dlove a DS1 reimagined. Same story and bosses, new reimagined combat, weapon artys, level design. We already have DS1 to play whay not make a completly new yet farmilliar experience.
6 years later and I still think this video underappreciates the good (quite a bit) and overreacts to the bad (quite a bit as well). The remastered dark souls is amazing for three simple reasons for me - I can go to blighttown and get 60 fps instead of 5 fps. I can experience pretty much the original game, same as always, with upgrades to the visuals and hud. I can bulk use items instead of going through each individual soul and using it, which was a stupid hassle. I don't care if they fixed those bugs tbh, cuz at this point, it has been so long that they have become part of the game.
@@whitevii1533 thats the problem though. Its a different letter. Pretty much all switch games use the A button to accept things so its ingrained into people that that is the confirm button so they really should've changed it
Lawfy D. Ace I actually found this small extra layer of challenge welcome. I figured out that just edging out on the left pulls the first bone wheel. From there, just take it slow and you’ll pull them one at a time
Then don’t fucking rest at it? Lmao. Nobody wanted it anyway apparently so there you go. Your naysaying has been justified. Jesus Christ I’ve never seen such a massive group of whiny people before
Well badboy sorry for our standars not being as shitty as yours, next time I will eat the shit served on my plate and not complain, cause God forbid I have any kind of standard especially when asked to pay 20$ for what is a (not even a good patchfix)
The only pvp I've had is 3 giant dads, a dark bead, and a pyromancer that spammed great combustion, then kept messaging me "Pig 🐷", at level 30 Thank god it's there
One of the things that really pissed me off was the ram memory error, which wouldn't let many players in the game even if you meet the requirments. And guess what? The community bypassed that error.. and now most people with can play the game.. And its not over yet.The game is locked on 60 fps makes your game your game run in slow motion when you go below 40 which is dumb af, like wtf. Why make this stupid decision? I ran 60 for the most part but when it goes below that its more unplayable than the original one. Hell DS3 feels still great at 30 fps, unlike here. Oh well. Also I hope the weapon match making is fixed if it hasn't already.
The reason the game is locked to 60 fps and slows if you go under it is the same reason the original was locked to 30-game speed is tied to framerate. Clearly they decided that undoing ds1's sphaghetti code to separate game speed and framerate was not worth the dev time.
I was wondering why my game ran like its in slow motion. My PC aparently cant handle the "remaster" so i have 60 in some areas but then it drops to 40-35 in a second and everything slows down. Its a shame i was really excited to play this game.
had that bug and didnt knew it could be fixed so i refunded the game. Best choice by far never gonna buy dat shit remaster and hope from dies with cancer for making such a shit and insulting "remaster" which was released for keeping us busy until the next shit game dat isnt bloodborne 2
Jacob Ellis doesn't make the complaints any less valid though; plus, it's hardly random, this is a well put together video that's organised with thought put into it
A game having a lot of flaws doesn't necessarily mean it can't be fun. I mean, lord knows Oblivion is flawed all to hell, and I fucking love that game. Even something like Fallout 4 has its moments.
You forgot about the Lower Undead Burg Capra Demon skip. Basically the same as Sen's skip but it lets you skip the capra demon to get to the dephts, allowing you to upgrade your weapon without killing the actual boss.
im going to say it scholar of the first sin is a better remake/remastered and game then dark souls remastered it atleast you know did something other then add mods to the game as official content and in some case fail to be as good as the mods
Honestly SOTFS barely changed anything actually important about the game. There’s some cool changes, but overall it really wasn’t that amazing or necessary. But the thing is that that wasn’t really the purpose of that particular remaster anyway. In the case of DSR, however, the expectation when you bring back an OLD game like this is that you’re doing so to bring it into the present day... I mean why bother otherwise? And unfortunately DSR really doesn’t meet that expectation. I’m happy to have it if only so that I can play the game online with people again, but realistically, it didn’t achieve what it really ought to.
I love how you can go from getting invaded by someone with 5 weapon levels over you to 11 weapons levels over in undead burg just by getting lucky with a black knight weapon drop or by picking up the astora strait sword
This video just got recommended for me as I've been watching a lot of DSR walkthroughs and stuff. The remaster was my first time playing DS, and I gotta say it was an amazing experience. But it's no remaster at all. I certainly didn't experience any of the bugs the og game had, but graphically and in pretty much every sense, it's the same damn game. Def not worth $40 and def no remaster. Fucking Fromsoft just put out the same game again but for current gen consoles
Yeah that’s why I bought it when it went on sale. DS is my favorite game of all time and I thought it was worth getting the entire game + DLC at a consistent frame rate for around 19 bucks. But it’s definitely not a good remaster, at the minimum they should’ve fixed lost Izalith and bed of chaos lol
I bought DSR after scholar of the first sin and ds3. I bought ds3 at game stop on sale just thinking I'll give it a try, and I loved the game so much I got scholar of the first sin and loved that one just as much, so I'll always be grateful for DSR for letting me experience all three of the games instead of just two of them. When I got DSR, I loved it just as much as the other two. I hated this video because it's trying to ruin a version of Dark Souls. A game that's heralded as one of the best video games ever made. This isn't how you get people to try out the game for themselves, which those new fans could also fall in love with the series like I did
It's not FromSoft that made the remaster. Bandai Namco hired some random ass Chinese corp. FromSoft are actually pretty cool. But Bandai likes money a lot
@@nickjones851 theres nothing wrong with shitting on a 3rd release of essentially the same game when they basically changed nothing he specified THIS version and just the pc one he's stated he was fine with the console versions as its getting it on things that dont have it and even suggested grabbing it on consoles if you havent played before but how they did it on pc was scummy taking off the old one completely and yknow we already got the "complete" edition with the prepare to die edition and then it got released again just because he likes ds1 doesnt mean he cant criticize the bullshit the devs pull
Metao by all means, go play your downgraded trash. if youre really convincing yourself that the OG ds1 on xbox is better than the remaster, then you are objectively wrong and not worth debating. ill stick with the factually better version.
AH silver But you're objectively wrong, because DS:R doesn't really do much to upgrade the game. In fact, some of their changes will be a pain in the ass in the future. And also, you can't call the original game a "Downgrade", because IT CAME OUT BEFORE. It's been almost a decade since DS1 came out, and the fact they couldn't do more is completely bullshit. I do prefer playing DS1 on xbox one over DS:R on xbox one.
Soo, how long will it take for opponents of this video to realize it's addressed at the fact, that it's a shit remaster and not a shit game? My guess is the heat death of the universe.
Mitch K If you've seen his "DSR is Insulting" you already know what exactly he meant to say with it. And if the title is your biggest gripe with the video, so be it.
Two points years after (I got DSR a few weeks ago with some friends during a steam sale). It most certainly was just a money grab, it probably cost them 1/100th of what making a new game would cost while charging a new game price. My friends and I have enjoyed playing it, most because we wanted to play through all the DS games together. They definitely could have fixed a lot more of the textures and bugs, especially with a $40 sticker price but until you pointed out how shit some of them look I didn’t even realize. Good video and fair points
youlikefeet, would highly disagree. The ONLY reason I was able to play through or even attempt DS1 remastered was because I wanted to connect get a better understanding of the realm after playing DS3. By modern standards of gaming, I would hardly call DS1 Rem. "art". Not by PC standards and not by PS 4 console standards.
No, I am not referring to graphics, but an argument could be made on that front as well. I do mean "art", and by extension "art direction". DS1 is quite bland and to my eyes (DLC excluded) soporific in this respect. I prefer the dreary, glossy wet Gothic feel of Bloodborne and the object and building design (artistically) from DS3.
@@youlikefeet you know, just because Bloodborne is a PS exclusive and you can't play it doesn't mean you can make up shit inside your head about how shit it must be. Makes you come off like a pathetic weirdo.
Alright Finished most of the Souls game with KB&M. That includes : 1. Dark souls PtDE (dsfix, yes, but no mods that changed the controller input icon into a keyboard one.) 2. Dark Souls 2 SotFS 3. Dark Souls 3 (beat midir on 3rd try which was awesome) 4. Sekiro (still waiting for dlc) Honestly only the 1st run is difficult until somewhere in the middle part where my muscle memory just remember every input automatically.
God I forgot how good lobos was at taking a loss like that. It really does take another kinda dude to get a bug like that and not walk away from the game entirely.
The Good - 00:30
Patched Bugs - 03:33
The Bad - 05:06
Bugs - 10:20
The Ugly - 16:55
Counter-Arguements - 22:03
Conclusion - 28:36
InfernoPlus Don't forget "the beauty." Jk
Could use a sort menu for items
\[T]/ great job
Came for the ugly one
If I've never played the game, is it worth for pc? or if I want to play should I just buy the console version?
A PvP community that's total cancer?
Next you'll be telling me that there's water in the ocean!
water is wet
Gnome Warlock the community is the most toxic of any other. I just came across a hank squad with 3 overleveled phantoms in catacombs. People like that are who killed the game
You've never played for honor on PC then. also, you're invading..its kinda up to them how they want to play so either invade reds, don't invade, or get good enough to not worry about gank squads, gravity is still op, that's a bug they haven't fixed so....
also hank squad sells humanity and humanity accessories so idk why you hate them...
XmcJesus I'm all for ganking and using phantoms and attempting gank spanks, but I cant stand the overleveled phantoms with end game equipment
**salt water**
Iron ******
1:30 found it
*Shrek
iron fuck nigga
Ooff
Iron Pineapple youre a god
Remember when skyrim special edition came out and everyone who had base game got it for free?
I remember that. Good stuff.
Except on Xbox. You have to rebut Skyrim. Again.
"base game" that's BS tho; you needed all the DLC to get the upgrade; if you didn't you had to pay.
source: have base game since release; didn't buy DLCs cause game was shit; I didn't get the upgrade
@@Regginyx if you thought the game was shit why are you complaining about not getting the upgraded version.
@@hmaster24 just correcting facts; couldn't care less about the upgrade lmfao; I couldn't be arsed playing the original; an updated form wouldn't change my views on it haha; but yeah nah; just wanted to correct that misinformation.
gonna have to give bethesda less credit than they deserve; anyone giving bethesda undeserved credit; you know I'm bound to be around to rip it away
There's a weird bug where I didn't receive the remaster for free even though I paid for a half assed PC port that was fixed by modders.
@Source Dasher cool, thanks
"oh excuse me; you had me confused for a Bethesda game for a second there"
Lol I still have my copy of prepare to die.
"Their job was to fix these bugs"
bullet-sweating Speedrunners: "s-sure....yeah..."
Speedruners watching this vid like: FROM DONT FIX PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASE
I know this is a joke but... That quite literally *is* a big reason why a lot of bugs aren't fixed... It's because the community has come to view them as "features."
Anytime there's a remaster or remake of anything, whether it be a movie, or game, or what have you, the creators have to walk a very precarious tightrope of trying to revamp the product, but not changing it so much that it alienates fans of the original. Inevitably, there will always be a large chunk of people that cry because "It's not like the original!" and therefore will shit on it for that. Despite anything being a bug, changing it from the original is what will make people complain. And then there's videos such as this one, that shit on it for not being different enough. It's a situation that the creators are damned if they do, and damned if they don't. Take note of like any remake of any classic movie ever, and there's a very high chance people just automatically shit on it, regardless of how it actually is. The same effect is happening with remasters and remakes, like Dark Souls: Remastered and Warcraft: Reforged. It's virtually a coin toss whether any fanbase will accept a remaster/make of anything.
@@user-vf3cb7vk8z "They half-way fixed this one thing that really had little to do with your comment or anything really so this entirely disproves you."
Jesus...
@@user-vf3cb7vk8z They didn't actually go in and specifically fix that bug. The way the bug was created was a side effect of something else they fixed, and the bug just got took with it.
Yes, they "half way" fixed it because they didn't mean to actually do that, it just was a coincidence; And it's theoretically still possible if you get it absolutely frame perfect, but humanly implausible.
@@user-vf3cb7vk8z I quite literally never mentioned the word "speedrunners," or any variation thereof, until this very sentence. So I don't know why you think I'm saying they're "pandering to speedrunners." I was making a general statement about the community as a whole that would share that sentiment, not just speedrunners.
Maybe go back and read, and actually take a moment to think about what's being said before you just go spewing out random replies.
They should have remastered Demon's Souls instead.
What for? It would be called a cash grab too. Fromsoft might as well make no remasters anymore.
Remake or some kind of a demon's souls inspired game would be better
Csúb - Az Űrmedve yeah that would be so awesome. i could never play it and a remaster would be perfect.
But Bandai Namco has nothing to do with Demon’s Souls and I doubt the decision to rerelease DaS came from Fromsoft
Csúb - Az Űrmedve I think there was copyright issues so they cant (or i'd be too much work), but theres a ps3 emulator in the works so that's the best your going to get.
It’s on Nintendo switch though that means I can play dark souls on the shitter
You still didn't deserve to pay a high retail value for it though.
At most, you should've paid $25-30 USD for a release day copy.
$40 is reserved for a very good remastered like Halo Anniversary.
Or play Switch for free on desktop. How long does it take to drop a #2?
DS1 is free on desktop also. $25 for a digital copy game? Lol. $40? Dear lord..
@@tokiwartooth4404 by DS1 is free do you mean it actually is? Or you just mean piracy
@@DaBonkinator If it's not on disc, then it's worthless to the consumer. Digital games = freeware.
Digital games are even easier to share than physical. Consider it a donation to the less fortunate who can't throw money around due the high cost of basic needs. The beauty of digital file sharing.
you two are morons (not you, da bonkinator)
And yet 2 years later here we are, inferno made a mod that actually remastered dark souls.
So upset I need to get PTD edition, though. Seems hard af to find it for less than a couple hundred bucks.
@@maxmazza2987for me the cheapest one would be 500 hundred moneys lmao i live in a porr country for context it is much more in count to make a time travel machine.
The epitome of "I guess I'll do it myself"
@@maxmazza2987 your best bet is to pirate it.
@@tostadorafuriosa69 that's something i'd do, i won't spend like 30-40 bucks for the PTD edition, i'd rather buy the remaster for that price
My biggest problem is that I can't get Prepare to Die edition anymore...
I hope they add it back, because the page is still there, but they replaced the file with the remaster...
Not even Bethesda are this scummy...
@@Tasorius Blame Bandai Namco, not From. From had literally nothing to do with this "remaster". Bandai Namco paid a Chinese company (Virtuos) to do this "remaster".
@@Capnsensible80 Then why was the real game removed from Steam...?
@@Tasorius because from software doesn't control it's store pages Bandai Namco does because they're the publisher. That's just common knowledge and common sense.
@@Capnsensible80 There was no real reason not to just hide it, instead of removing it completely... It's nothing less than sacrilege...
I'm also a bit worried about the next time I have to switch to a different computer or something, that it will become impossible to re-install it.
I have it on an external hard drive, but I don't know how that works...
I just paid money for a regulation patch
You just paid money for *more* bugs.
10/10 marketing, cant wait for "Dark Souls: For real this time" edition.
It’s sad that at least for the pc version of this it could have been a patch and instead the people that owned the game have to pay $20 for it it’s $40 for console which is not worth it in the slightest
You can only blame yourself for being so gullible and for not making the effort of getting some basic information before buying something.
Albino
lol idiot
Stop chatting shit the lot of you. You fucking PC gamer's think everything shouls be given to you for free. I'm now 105 hrs into the game on PS4 pro and it's a brilliant game. I played Demon Souls nearly 9 years ago and bought Dark souls 1 day of release on PS3. And for £28 for a PS4 game that I've put over 100 hrs and still haven't finished as I'm going for the plat it's money well spent. Why don't you lot actually go out and buy and play some of these games before you comment and something you know fuck all about. And before the PC virgins start saying "PC master race" or "console peasant" I have a PS4 pro Nintendo switch a macbook pro and a Gaming PC. And trust me it costs more money being a gamer on console. And this gen I've bought most of the new releases on PS4 as the line up has been brilliant. And I got sick of the constant stream of buggy broken games being ported over to PC. Anyways by looks of it this Dark Souls release was a console remaster and honestly don't know why PC gamer's would of bought it as the PC version a few years back had a improvement in graphics back then. And all the logic "o I should get the game for free as I own it already" does that include me also as I own it on PS3 or what about the players who own it on 360. If everybody had that line of though there wouldn't be any money coming in to pay for these game. And with videos and most of these comment it's going to put From off making remaster of Demon Souls and make the online alive again. so stop Moaning everybody wow you getting DS1 for $20 with better frame rate graphics dedicated servers and increased online numbers in co-op. So how about support From Software with the hopes they will make a remaster of Demon Souls. And before you reply to what I said look for somebody that has a lets play of the last gen version before later patches and compare somewhere like Blighttown.
I paid $40 for a bonfire next to Vamos.
I am so sorry.
Kristian Hicks Actually no, I'm not. What the fuck were you thinking? That was all you buddy
The remaster is geared towards people new to the game
I was thinking they would re-release an amazing game, having had made it more amazing. Guess I was wrong, eh?
Innocent Bystander I also like how you come back several weeks later to reply to this comment in specific again
Dark Souls deserves a remake like the one Demon’s Souls got
SERIOUSLY
Wtf
I hope it won't be PS Exclusive.
Demon's Souls remake definitely needed the quality of life changes that later Souls games added. The AI was also terrible and the bosses underwhelmed, for the most part. The developers could have made it more of a challenge.
@@TehSamurai **me who has never played demons souls but can’t because of all the damn scalpers**I’ll probably die a ton still
very true, ive only played the remaster. and i find it very clunky and boring. im so into the lore and have watched hour to two hour long videos about the lore. but its just so boring to me. but i fuckin loved demons souls on ps5
Chorus: OOOOOOOOOOOH
*camera moves up
Chorus:.........
*camera moves down
Chorus: OOOOOOOOOOOOOH!
*why do i hear boss music?*
Choir*
@@Mr1897WinchesterSlinger It's not grammar, dipshit
@@Mr1897WinchesterSlinger Be quiet boy do not insult a man because he corrected someone.
"just stick with the old version of the game" right yeah, i'll just go buy it- oh wait
Elaborate?
@@wowwow-xp9sk From software removed the original dark souls version off steam. The remaster is your only legal option
@@Adnonnymous loool who the heck is legal anymore?🤣
@@vladymartinez1232 Good question. I never said i gave a shit, but if you wanna play online then you have to get the remaster, because i've yet to find a working crack for any illegitimate versions.
@@Adnonnymous thats true
Holy crap. The ash lake glitch should be a feature. Its freaking hilarious
What's so funny about music turning on and off? Like really? You probably get entertained by infomercials and doorknobs
@@ramrodbldm9876 ok nerd
@@ramrodbldm9876 Its funny because its break immersion in the game by most stupid thing possible - camera angle.
@@Edgariki It's funny because AAAAAAA-
AA-
@@ramrodbldm9876 it turns on and off based on the cameras altitude so you can control it
As someone who has only played the remastered version, I didn't know that descending a ladder wasn't supposed to be so bumpy. I just assumed that it was supposed to be like that, as the Chosen Undead was hitting every rung to control their fall.
I played the entire remastered without knowing you can side down ladders instead of slowly go down
@@stanime3065 I played the entire remastered game fat-rolling... and I didn't know you could run till Gwyn
Have a good day
@@thelvadem5713 ouch, I figured that out just after gargoyles myself though haha
@@thelvadem5713 Wdym run till Gwyn?
@@stanime3065 How do you do it? I know it's a feature, but idk how to pull it off.
1:13
9/11 - IGN
Powerwolf did 9/11
I love that I always see you on every Dark Souls video ♡
Is IGN run by _the Jews_ ?
Tas - Are you a Nazi?
nah, I'm just mocking them
The ankles thing caught me so off guard I was literally in tears laughing.
BirdsEyeView i am dead, beeen playing it and omg wtf is up with that haha
dude the progressively slower minecraft pain sounds
i pissed myself
*D E S G U S T A N G*
Interestingly, there are cloth physics on armor... ON THE ENEMIES. Look at the silver knight cape, it has physics, but when the player wears the armor, it doesn't. I don't know how they could mess up this badly
2010
Probably because they outsourced it to a different team or something.
@@krishivagarwal5189 it was the case in the original too
Very minor thing to complain about it had no effect to game play.
@@RockyApp We still wanted a cape, dammit.
"They added a bonfire next to Vamos" that's only a good thing once you have the lord vessel. If you sit on that God forsaken bonfire, without the lordvessel, I'm so sorry. Its almost im-fucking possible to get out. Almost.
From personal experience: yeah
Just deleted a character the other day after getting drunk and making this mistake the night before. I know how to make it out, and I've done it a fair few times before, but it's so aggravating that I'd rather just start over half the time. Lol
I shit you not I was in a call with my friends and sat at this bonfire, thought it would be an easy way out right?
Spent the next 6 fucking hours trying to escape, spending 2 finding a strategy to avoid those skeleton wheel looking fuckers, I accidentally
Killed pinwheel then left and arrived back at firelink. Never want to do that again😅
I dunno, I actually like the Vamos bonfire, it's a place of safety and rest, getting out is easy.... honest.
You guys are exaggerating the climb out. I mean its supposed to be a challenging climb but it's completely doable.
Even if you sit at tomb of the giants bonfire and then realize you can't beat the level yet, the climb out isn't that bad.
If they had rebuilt Dark Souls and made it look as good as 3 that would have been incredible
Look AND play as good as 3.
@@innerface. yes as! Implement changes to the HUD and menus so they'll match more towards the style and convenience of 3.
Still be the same game as 1, but how cool would it be to go to the bonfire and see a preview of each area before fast-travelling?
But Dark Souls 3 was ugly, and in my opinion they should have made it more like Dark Souls 2
@@vexvalentine5689 ma boi
@Onigiri Otaku i love Bloodborne but the menus were annoying and while a good game doesnt feel like a souls game, still great. but lets be real its not Bloodborne Kart so it doesnt matter
15:38 that's entirely intentional. Vamos doesn't have flesh or vocal chords so he doesn't speak normally. He's either using magic or he is literally vibrating bones to produce sound.
Yeah, that's what I've been saying for a long time! Finally, someone agrees with me
Exactly
@@orionfell yeah it comes across as a shitty mic not a sentient skeleton who's speaking without vocal cords
@@Ryan-op7yd how tf you know what a Skelton that doesn't have vocal chords sounds like
@@kaylaani8991 Asking way too many questions you don't want to know the answers to
Honestly seeing “backstab remastered”
Had me dying
to think 3 years later, this lad makes a mod that fixes the game and adds so much more content after calling it trash and getting the obligatory "alright, then do better" response...
....and he did
xplain
@@tostadorafuriosa69 he wanted to make a multiplayer mod on old halo maps with custom maps, so when he was making content for the mod he went and fixed everything that was wrong with it. Check his recent vids
@@angelosd2 yeah then the server inferno runs ip banned all of my accounts because i said FF14 is for fat chicks, that "enward" was 90% of my vocab, and "sup my gravelords"
and they thought i was a neonazi based on that. none of the rules were broken btw. I wasnt warned. they just.... dont like any form of humor in #general chat.
literally didnt ban evade. didnt have the chance. I originally thought only my main was effected. but nope. 1 button press cascaded through everything i own from alts to vpns.
He didn’t fix the remaster he fixed the original game
@@D4CLVT and made it better than the remaster
If I were to play this, I would play it offline. I’ve learned enough from Dark Souls 3’s High Wall of Lothric that people will go through the entire game to be able to ruin your experience.
I see where you're coming from but really rather than multiplayer the only 2 points of being in human form is to boost your bonfires or if you want to do the PVE invasions where one of the AI will invade you but then again that's just my opinion and everyone has their own opinions
I just created a new character yesterday I was only level 5 at the burg and I got invaded, I was only doing 18 damage to the guy
@@Odd-Definition armor reinforcement doesn't effect matchmaking iirc
@@jconley2795 yea its wack, he was also using the mask of the son and the gravelord sword. I was only level 5 tho :( that means this dude grinded thru the catacombs just to troll low level players.
@@jconley2795 yea its wack, he was also using the mask of the son and the gravelord sword. I was only level 5 tho :( that means this dude grinded thru the catacombs just to troll low level players.
Bad remaster? Yes. Worth buying if you've never played Dark Souls? Also yes.
Turn online on? Maybe not
well, i bought DS Prepare to die on steam for ... fifteen dollar ? and god this remaster make my deal sooooo worth it.
Piriph oh that’s wha I’ve been worry about. I wanna play the full dark souls series after I’ve finished BloodBorne. And I wanted to know if it would be okay to buy the remaster because it would be my first time.
I received this as a gift, so I'm definitely not complaining 😁
(Still playing Bloodborne though.)
Tleii0._ Just wait for the Trilogy on Consoles coming XD
How can you call something a remaster when you did the bare minimum and didn't fix 8 year old bugs?
I hate how companies do this. Rerelease the same game, do fuck all, maybe add a bit of lighting, then throw it out there and expect people to buy it claiming it is remastered when it isn't.
I am not wholly against remasters if they are done right, and there plenty of good examples of it being done right. I just hate these lazy asshats that throw out the word remaster without actually remastering anything.
It should have been marketed as a port to current gen but they fucked up by calling it a remaster
By calling the bugs features, you fixed them
Low standards
If you apply new shaders, textures and set it up to 60fps 1080p, yes, you can. A remaster needs only to be in visual terms by definition. A good one? Nope
I feel loke no-one is more qualified to criticize DSR than Inferno, considering he single handedly fixed all of the bugs and rebalanced the game. This man is a coding god.
Dark Souls re-release? more like shiva the deceased lol
I fucking love you
i hope you fix the problems in your life from where this anger is manifested @SL3DG3 It's okay
@SL3DG3 why hamster dicks though
@@Bendanna93 the world may never know...
@@Bendanna93 it is the age of the dark
Now that the Demon Souls remake happened, I honestly wouldn't be upset at all if they decided to do a Dark Souls remake, where they gave it the love and effort it deserves. I would not mind buying the game again, if they did that.
Only if done by fromsoftware themselves and not BluePoint.
@shortythecat As far as I am concerned if you completely change the art style of a game and change all the music it isn't demon's souls anymore. Miyazaki and From also was not involved so I don't care for it.
@shortythecat DeS remake is fucking amazing, and this is coming from a person who bought their PS3 because of DeS. The only downside is that they didn't actually add the cut content which defeats the purpose of a remake imo
@@JKSmith-qs2ii I love that all you fuckers are complaining that DS1 was the same game, but here you are saying DeS isn't valid because they changed the way it looks. You people.
It'd be nice to play a version of Dark Souls II where literally walking works properly and the lighting engine is in the game. You could do a pretty drastic remaster with little complaints since the community shits on it so hard already.
Boggles the mind how the same company that released Scholar of The First Sin released DSR.
At least Dark Souls 2 finally does something better than the original! Great ass video btw
I don't think they did. Scholar was made by From and I think it is a good remaster. I might be the only one who thinks that, but still. DSR was made by QLOC. A company known for ...under average... remasters.
Ds2 was broken on the ps4 for the first year. Weapons would brake after only a few hits making it unplayable. So ds2 was far from perfect, now it's patched it plays wonderfully but it didn't at first.
The Act Man never thought I'd see you here
Hurts my heart when people think Scholar was better than the original DS2... lol
Something in common with DSR and Scholar was that at some point things they promised was suppose to be a patch in the future, instead they ended up selling the game back to its customers with the minimal improvements. What I liked about Scholar was that it changed enemy placements, for veterans it just spices things up a bit (though I didn't understand why there was so many petrified people all around Drangleic randomly).
I liked what they did with Scholar, incorporating the DLC's a bit better so you had to find keys around the world rather than just being given to you because you bought them.
DSR I find rather insulting, least DS2 to Scholar there was noticeable differences in areas (lighting and effects predominantly from what I remember) but shown from the vid anyways I can't tell apart the original to remaster really
The ash lake music doesn't seem to have been a bug, it only happens the first time you go there, I think it was done that way to add atmosphere, since the music starts playing when you look at the sky and witness the grandeur!
Poop walk needs to be an option in settings. Now
Azurian Deidric it should accompany having an egg head.
That will be a paid DLC i think
All of this game's sin shall be forgiven. But only if we are able to walk like we shat ourselves. 👍
It's in the next lootbox.
Hey Azurian, become my .hack bro
And so, 3 years later..
You fixed it yourself
Omg the ankles part was hilarious. I haven't laughed like that in a while.
I played DSR for the first time a couple months ago on ps4 and was speechless when I noticed the bugged ankles. Wtf happened there?
Yea from seeing that, I can't feel my real ankles at all.
@@kuro_kishi the ankles 90 degree bending whenever i walk on uneven surface (like ash lake) really kills it
its still in the game
I know right🔥😂🔥
"Walking down a hill can kill you." That happened to me once at that exact location 12:55. I was so confused, thought I might have been unknowingly poisoned, and it led to at least ten more attempts at that frustrating location. I think it was maybe my second attempt. I wonder if some asshole at From put that bug in there because he thought it was funny.
12:13
I think Ornstein's charging attack is probably a recycled move from The False King in Demon's Souls. I remember the EXACT same glitch happening with his charge. haha
2 years later...
Inferno: So anyways ***I fixed everything***
@@Jason_Van_Stone this is the internet he doesn’t need to have perfect grammar you smooth brain.
@@Jason_Van_Stone anyways is a word
Dark Souls: Repurchased
Comment: Repasted
Joke: Re - Used
dark souls 3: dawn of the normies
More like Anti Dark Souls, because this shitty version replaced the real version on Steam...
@@Creedio90 Dark Souls 3: Controllers with only the R1 Button
“Thanks to everyone on Discord who proof read this”
25:20
“Your expectations are *to* high.”
🤦🏻♂️ 🤷🏻♂️😅
Exactly.
@@Crazyhorse184 No one worth anyone's time uses the Nitpicking argument. Ever.
@@asdergold1 Says the guy who capitalized "nitpicking." What an eloquent way to say "NUH UH."
It's a single fucking letter. Grow up.
There are several typos in the video. That one is not only not the first instance of a typo, but it's not even the first instance of that specific typo. What's worse is that every instance in the video where the word "too" is supposed to be displayed, it is misspelled as "to."
@@ootdega Utterly moronic. It's called humor. Get fucking real.
Miyazaki: It doesn’t matter. In the end, you’re going to pay for whatever has my name on it.
Dracoth Begone True but it’s a remaster of a Miyazaki game
Hah lol we aren't gonna pay for DS2 then
fine with me
Rudy Leon Scholar of The First Sin actually did pretty well financially
@@AstonishingRed Ye I need to play it
Both versions DS2 Vanilla and DS2:SOTFS
It's the only one out of the 3 I haven't played yet
Rudy Leon Dark Souls 2 in general is the weakest of the trilogy in my opinion. It’s not a bad game by any means but I just enjoyed DS1 and DS3 way more. But some love it so give it a shot. Scholar in particular is extremely long if you complete all the DLC
I remember a time when Remaster meant to re-master a game. The devs have the chance to go back and improve the game that they made.
Then companies started to remaster games that have only been out for like a year for double the money.
And then they just started to Improve the Graphics.
And now their just releasing the same game but worse.
TBF it's not the dev's that do this it's the publishers. It's not common for the devs of the original game to work on remasters of their older games. Remasters for the most part or outsourced to smaller studios.
THERE IS NOW
A BONFIRE
NEXT TO VAMOS
6:40
"It CAN cause issues in the future"
...
What future? :D
Sulfur sad but true. Kinda sucks that this game is dying/dead already
it has 1000 players as of 20 minutes ago. its like its trying to survive but never will
@@jynxed66six54 im stucking with ps3 one
@@obidahasdia4095 ayyy same bro I'm might get dark souls 2
_i mean if you wanna play but that's up to you_
@@dennisr6718 that might be bcz is the game that we all already played and know from begging to end
id honestly be fine if they kept the original on steam.
Well, they did kind of. Just get the pirated copy, not like it'll need any updates.
@@jameson7276 Meh, not really much point. Pirated games tend not to work with mods and technically besides the mods, remastered IS better in every respect (to my knowledge, i got into souls after the remaster was released.
Not only that I cant find a decent download link for it.
how would they get more money then?
@@danylo211 people buying it? lol
@@tannerteddo when companies make remasters of old games, a lot of things happen: it gets a lot of publicity (more people interested = more money), it attracts customers that only want high quality games and that do not want to suffer with garbage graphics (= more money), the fact that they are making a remaster allows them to charge extra money regardless of whether or not they deserve it (less effort = more money)
even if they didn’t raise the price, the game would still have more sales than the original.
The thing that I hated was the bonfire animation. Before it was slow, calm and comfy. A place to rest for a while. Now it's just a fire.
Eh, I much prefer the new one, it's bigger and has a nice warm comfy glow around it, it's more akin the the bonfire I'm later souls games.
I was saved by my god awful framerate
I prefer new one
Ds1R on the switch has the old bondfire animations/textures :D
I agree. The original bonfire seemed more mystical. And it made sense from a lore perspective. But it’s only present in dark souls 1 so they probably wanted to have some continuity with the other games.
Can't forget the "Nitto stuck on geometry" issue where he will literally be unable to walk away from his spawn location unless you kite him further into his boss room... Also Pinwheel is still treated like a boss.... So that's still broken (joke)
*Doot*
They could of just given pinwheel a lot more health and he would be instantly a better boss
I thought he got stuck on his skeletons
12:14
ZOOM ZOOM ORNSTEIN, ALL AROUND ANOR LONDO HE GOES, WHERE HE'S GONNA STOP: NOBODY KNOWS!
Nice democracy reference
Oh lawd he comin' lol
I didn't even know that was a glitch, I just thought that was part of the game!
@@elcotonex9016 I didnt know it was a glitch i thought it was just a fucking broken move, i have a love hate relationship with O&S, its so fun if the RNG works, otherwise you get ganked by the broken charges of both O&S or just fucked by smoughs awful hit box, or they both just stick to each other and do nothing. But if RNG serves you well and they split up a bit and come in and out to attack its an incredible fight
Soulplay Lp *demodcracy
"running down the hill can kill you" I mean.. try that irl and see how that goes
the result depends on how steep the hill is, how hard the ground is, if there's anything that could be tripped over, and if the ground is wet enough for you to slip.
Well you don't killi dragons irl
Maybe you don't kill dragons in real life, but in my hood, anything goes.
Why are you comparing real life physics in a game where you have to jump into an abyss and not sustain damage because of a spooky magic ring to kill 4 ghostly assholes?
This glitch actually happened to me once. I was running down the stairs to the Ariamis painting and suddenly died, very confused as to how since i wasn't invaded and i went from full hp to dead.
Ffs, this video is just over 6 years old and that 'counter argument' against QoL still irritates me because people are STILL using it to this day for EVERYTHING. If QoL makes the game easier, than the difficulty was from jank and poor design, not genuine challenge. So it should be fixed so that players get a better experience overall, even if it comes at the cost of 'game no hard no more'.
I think its hilarious that people think DS:R was marketed towards people who played DS3 but didn't play the original...
When my copy of DS3 for the XBONE came with a *free code for DS1.*
da_huntz Well, I played ds3 but I didn't played the original, that's why I buyed DS:R, you are not the only person in the world
No everyone is targeted but mainly people who started with the new gen of consoles PS4, Switch and Xbox One.
I purchased Remaster because I played DS3 and never played the original
I buyed DS:R too
I think it's hilarious that you think everyone bought a *physical copy for XBONE* .
Simply put, its the pricing and removing DS PTD Edition. I knew it would be some textures, framerate fixes and bug fixes. But $20 for existing owners? Its ludicrous.
CD Projekt Red released Witcher 1 and 2 Enhanced editions which added proper bug fixes, cleaned up animations, new gear, new quests, new characters, new difficulties and this was all free for people who had already bought the earlier versions. To be fair, these weren't complete engine swaps, that is likely why DSR is so expensive. That and Bandai feeling they can milk their braindead Souls fan base.
If they went all out and fixed Lost Izalith, Bed of Chaos, added improved rolling, cloth physics, restored some cut content and maybe even some new stuff, then people would be a lot happier with the game and price. As it stands, you're getting fleeced.
If they fixed Lost Izalith, Bed of Chaos, restored cut content and/or added new stuff it would make the game a remake instead of a remaster, which in my honest opinion would be worth the full $40 price tag even for existing owners of DS PTD, myself included.
Though in it's current state it's nothing but a cash grab for PC players.
FromSoft did not develop the Remaster. QLOC did not have the rights (nor would I want a third party making significant changes to the base game) to add any assets to the game.
Let's be clear: Bandai was right that they can milk the Souls fan base. Remember, DS3 came out 3 years ago. People are thirsty for new Dark Souls so DS:R was easy money. I wouldn't be surprised if they did Bloodborne Remastered (now for PC and Xbone) in a year or two.
Dan Lorett I don't think Sony would let Bloodborne slip away from PlayStation exclusivity lol as nice as that would be
You forgot to add all the new bugs introduced in this "remaster". Look up Letofski's : "Dark Souls Remastered: Bug Report"
If I could summarize this into a few sentences:
“You see this. This is garbage. So I shall now devote my own soul to making a true remaster, by making this as cursed as physically possible.”
>every invader is a minmaxed bloodthirsty goon
They've always been like that, lol.
that was the point he was making ._.
Not really. He means that now, all the invaders are either giantdads, or another variation of low level, but using a +5 chaos weapon with HR getting one shot lagstabs.
No-one is trying to be unique or have fun. It's just "look, I'm a twink build" and that's it
Jamie Ellis
People have been doing that for ages, lol.
And that's the problem with this remaster. All of the veterans know exactly what is op, what min/max to do whereas in a new souls release, everyone is experimenting. A lot of people are here to just wreck new players, but by doing so, will kill the game. Because why would a new player stick around when an invader is just going to one shot them with a +5 chaos HR lagstab and then taunt them because they're a twink pvp build and the host isn't.
All of us right? thats why im pvping at 130 with an optimized build like the majority of vets from the first game. I swear this guys fan base just complains and cries about everything. Im remembering why i unsubbed.
People are far too easy on mistakes FromSoft make. Yes, pretty much every souls game is objectively a great game, far above most of its peers, but that doesn't mean we can't call out mistakes and call out bad decisions. Nothing is perfect, we can't get things to be perfect unless we say what is wrong.
first of all; FromSoft didn't made the remaster
Second; It really sucks as a remaster, just look at skyrim remaster that's how it should be made
In simple terms:
5 star game
2 star remaster
They're completely independent of each other. You consider both before buying
Especially when bloody bussiness decisions are concerned.
From didn't make the remaster.
They didn't, but they are still responsible for aproving something as insulting as this.
>There's a great thread on Reddit
I might have fallen for a lot of things in life, but I ain't falling for that.
what?
hulawife Reddit is shit. That's the joke.
Garsh, already summer ain't it?
its....... summer....
>using meme arrows outside of 4chan
Dark souls 2: has lucatiel of mirrah
Dark souls 1: doesnt.
Ds2 better confirmed
Dark souls 2: has adaptability
Dark souls 1: doesn't.
Dark souls 1 better confirmed
@@spookyjohn6543 ew
@@islapliberals5164 dark souls: has bed of chaos
Dark souls 2: has old iron king and his fucking hole
Both suck confirmed
Parryable friendlies. I always thought that was a feature not a bug.
wallpaper42 i find it funny, me and my buds are always parrying each other when we are waiting for something
Things like that bugs are a reason why I love this game tbh
wallpaper42 u could parry everything..
steve guff
, except not humans.
It is a bug and it is pretty funny. People just like to think they're all high and mighty when they nit pick games and list little bugs that don't matter at all.
To be honest, seeing the changes they've made, this seems more like something they should just release as a patch for the original rather than a $40 game... pretty much the only reason I would get this is because the original crashes every 2 minutes on my PC, but that was something THEY SHOULD HAVE FIXED YEARS AGO AND IT SHOULDN'T BE SOMETHING WE HAVE TO PAY FOR
Doctorzzim Wow, what a good work they've did! (sarcasm)
Doctorzzim (1: sorry for my bad english 2: sorry for the big comment) I am crazy I would said it in their face. Shurely, they've done a good work in some aspects of the game like remaking the effects of spells, but there's a Lot of things that they SHOULD have done and you know that, more... Important things you know? Things that we really needed, things that we really ASKED FOR. They didn't fixed MOSTLY of the bugs (actually they fixed the "small" bugs, the big fucking messy bugs like chain backstabs or the Pricilla's corruption bug are still there) + the new bugs, game mecanics are still broken, and it somehow looks even worse than the original at "some" parts. They should have improved the original game and added new features, they haven't done a real good job in none. The "mecanics" they added like the "coop scaling" doesn't work properly. They had ALL the time in the world and seems like their job is at half.
Doctorzzim it's a bad remaster. They should have called as a port.
Doctorzzim The port thing is just a joke :v and why do you defend so much this clearly bad remaster? It's because the GAME is good? Yes, Dark Souls is great, but not this remaster, definitelly not worth of 40 Bucks (or in my case 180 Bucks... Yeah, Brazil sucks dick)
Doctorzzim it's not my opinion dude, a huge amount of people think like that and they're right of thinking like this.
60fps blighttown is worth all the money lol
It's not worth anything, because they removed the real version from Steam.
Tasorius it’s a joke my dude,
@@erehh9817 But the joke was about the fact that they are selling it again without actually doing much, and charging too much for it.
But I wouldn't have cared about that for a second if they didn't remove Prepare to Die from Steam, and even kept the Prepare to Die page and put the remaster file there...
They could even have done the thing Bethesda did, where they hid the original Skyrim on steam, but it was still possible to buy it, because they didn't remove it...
(It also helped that I got the new version of Skyrim for free because I owned the original, and that it was actually an improvement that didn't take anything away from the game).
A company doing worse than Bethesda in that way really says something...
Tasorius by the way, you can’t buy Skyrim: Legendary Edition through steam nowadays, link or no link. You just can’t.
@@energyzerchanell I guess Bethesda saw my comment and realized that someone thought another company was scummier than then, so they couldn't stand it...
Because last time I clicked the "find more DLC" button (the only way to find it before, unless you has the link), it was still there, but now it wasn't.
Skyrim Special Edition is good though, and not trash, unlike the Dark Souls remaster turd.
I don't think anything good is going come from that company anymore anyways, because like Bethesda, they seem to be simplifying things, and someone said there won't be another Dark Souls...
What a time to be alive when a mod you made for OG Dark Souls: Prepare to Die - vis a vi your most recent video - is better than Dark Souls: Remastered and revitalized the online portion.
Why the fuck.... doesn't FROMSOFT hire you?
Why would they? He did a bunch of work for free and not even a fifth of the player base of DSRe is going to download some fan made bullshit when they didn't have a problem with what From gave them.
@@NottherealLucifer *fan made quality content when they didn't have a problem with the bullshit From gave them
I know I'm a year late, but I fixed it for you.
add me on runescape
Ninjaassassinguy Bruh add me
TheBigMoist1
+InfernoPlus are you in osrs or rs3? :o
Like number 69.
Yes I'm 12.
name's Leonara on rs3
add me bruh!
bruh if anyone can catch me up on rs3 add me coldwater25. Or chill with me in osrs cldwater25
Ash Lake music is no bug my friend, but an almighty feature.
Frost Wolf Aahhhhhmen.
no wonder you have 69 likes on your comment, what a damn legend.
I'm actually really enjoying the remaster, but mostly for the co-op with the revitalized community. Co-op in the original was a bit disappointing (especially in recent years because very few people were playing). But now there is no shortage of people willing to drop their signs or pick up yours.
The active multiplayer is the only reason to buy it if you have already played the game. Even if the PvP is kinda horrible it's still a lot of fun.
True true, I wasn't too interested in the PvP side of things because I was never that great at it, but the co-op is a blast.
I actually never did any of the pvp covenants in the original, so I decided to try out being a forest invader. Put on my ring, took 20 minutes to actually get summoned, and was greeted by a full 2 summon gank squad, just standing around the invasion point. What a great community.
The reason most people weren’t great at the pvp is because anyone playing through normally instead of twinking is already at a disadvantage... still can be fun though when you run into someone who you semi match with...
wondering how long that'll last.
i give it a year at best, and its gonna be dead again.
Ah the Ornstein charge bug. Happens to me so often that it takes most of the fun out of the fight. All of a sudden I'm just hit by a guy that teleports
That's a bug? I thought it was just one of his moves? That damn fast charge fucked me over in so many O&S fights. Every time I tried to attack smough ornstein would just zoom from across the room and hit me.
Do you think this game should be free for PC players that bought the prior game and it's dlc on Steam?
Skyrim SE did this, I think From/Bamco should do the same.
Label07 I agree, especially considering the poor value of this "remaster" and the awful state of the original PC version
Mister Sylveon they already got paid by from. they arent earning money through sales. its more like from wants the money.
If they truly "remastered" DS, like how InfernoPlus compared Halo 2 to Halo 2 Anniversary, I would be okay with paying some money for it. That is obviously, NOT, the case here.
Divan Paid by Namco not From, Namco own Dark souls IP.
should be free
Not a remaster, not a re-make, just a re-release. Also Red Faction Guerrilla is getting remastered and it's free for owners of the old version, thanks From Soft...
Why are you thanking FromSoft? They didn't release (That would be Bandai) the remaster or make it (QLOC). They are focused on Armored Core Reboot and whatever Shadows Die Twice ends up being (probably a new tenchu).
Thanks Bandai...
It is literally called dark souls remastered, and was marketed as such.
its not a re-release, a re-release implies a re-issuing of the original game either on it's original platform (IE: Greatest Hits, Platinum Hits or Complete Edition) or on a new system with no changes except for the standard resolution bump or framerate bump. This game was marketed as a remaster, which is taking the original assets and revamping them for a new platform, which is what Bandai Namco did, except they did a shitty job overall.
rereleases and ports often revamp graphics, a remaster requires remaking all graphical or audio assets, and a remake is when you recreate a game from the ground up.
I like only being able to warp to certain bonfires and having to traverse certain areas again. I also like the fact that you can’t warp until you get the lord vessel
Dark Souls, 2011: Graphics painstakingly tweaked by the original developers to deliver a rich, cohesive visual atmosphere.
Remastered, 2018: Graphics ported to a new engine and rushed to completion by an outsourced development team on a budget.
The results speak for themselves.
This is why I bought the original 2011 version on Amazon for my X360, and it's perfect.
There seem to be issues with the specular channel. In some places, the color of your character bleeds onto the environment. Also, using magic shield buff seem to be applied into the specular channel and your shield will glow only when light is reflecting.
Letofski also created a couple lists of bugs, in case you're curios.
And someone needs to remember these assholes that you're not getting a 50% discount for the game if you already own it on Steam. The 50% "discount" puts it at $20(or euro), which is the FULL price of the original DS1.
Damn, I just happened to rewatch this after watching ymfah's "Bow" Only run in DSR, and its kinda crazy how many of the bugs are still around and exploitable. Even poopwalk.
Let's be honest, some bugs and exploits are really fun and make the game much more interesting. I only play DS for the poopwalk so im glad it will never get patched out
@@D00000T i know, just saying that some glitches or bugs are pretty cool.
@@fnn6339 I use the brightness menu dupe glitch, but only for buying shit. I don't want to kill the same baked-naked dude over and over just to buy ONE tit shard
Maybe if they rebuilt it from the ground up in the bloodborne or dark souls 3 engines, while keeping the gameplay the same as DS1 then it'd be worth. What we got was a low-effort patch that costs money to install.
I absolutely am with you there. Back when I first heard about DS Remaster, I was imagining that exact thing. It would have been awesome.
I'm not. I knew exactly what it would be the moment it was announced, it's mostly just a grab for money from people wanting nostalgia or who never had a chance to play DS1 when there was a decent player population and want to experience it. It wasn't going to be some masterful rework, but only a cheaply produced graphics update. Did all that stop me from buying the game and enjoying it? No. Inferno is just salty his modding capability is gone within the rework and has to make it sound shit for everyone else.
1un4cy they also could have removed the four directional rolling
that would break the game design.
Honestly I'dlove a DS1 reimagined.
Same story and bosses, new reimagined combat, weapon artys, level design. We already have DS1 to play whay not make a completly new yet farmilliar experience.
6 years later and I still think this video underappreciates the good (quite a bit) and overreacts to the bad (quite a bit as well). The remastered dark souls is amazing for three simple reasons for me - I can go to blighttown and get 60 fps instead of 5 fps. I can experience pretty much the original game, same as always, with upgrades to the visuals and hud. I can bulk use items instead of going through each individual soul and using it, which was a stupid hassle. I don't care if they fixed those bugs tbh, cuz at this point, it has been so long that they have become part of the game.
This remaster is so half assed.
That the Switch version accepts with B without a way to change that.
That catched me so off guard that i still frequently press the wrong button when i try to buy stuff in DS.
its because thats how the ABYX are on xbox, but yes i agree they shoulda had where u can toggle between xbox and switch ABYX layout.
It's literally in the same position that it is on a PS or Xbox controller. It's just a different letter. It's the bottom button. Nothing changed.
@@whitevii1533 thats the problem though. Its a different letter. Pretty much all switch games use the A button to accept things so its ingrained into people that that is the confirm button so they really should've changed it
@@mattmangaming279 Yeah but... the placement is the same? It takes like 10 minutes to adjust. Really not a problem at all. It's nitpicking.
14:58 "Gargoyle got stuck in the beginning"
Demon's Souls Remastered looking real quality so far
Dude if you rest at the Vamos Bonfire you are trapped in an infinite loop of bonewheel action. It made the game harder...
Lawfy D. Ace I actually found this small extra layer of challenge welcome. I figured out that just edging out on the left pulls the first bone wheel. From there, just take it slow and you’ll pull them one at a time
badboy TW_17 They added a bonfire without making it safe to rest at... That's the only bonfire in all the DS games to be unsafe.
Slap Your Nan It’s just shitty game design.
Then don’t fucking rest at it? Lmao. Nobody wanted it anyway apparently so there you go. Your naysaying has been justified. Jesus Christ I’ve never seen such a massive group of whiny people before
Well badboy sorry for our standars not being as shitty as yours, next time I will eat the shit served on my plate and not complain, cause God forbid I have any kind of standard especially when asked to pay 20$ for what is a (not even a good patchfix)
The only pvp I've had is 3 giant dads, a dark bead, and a pyromancer that spammed great combustion, then kept messaging me "Pig 🐷", at level 30
Thank god it's there
One of the things that really pissed me off was the ram memory error, which wouldn't let many players in the game even if you meet the requirments. And guess what? The community bypassed that error.. and now most people with can play the game..
And its not over yet.The game is locked on 60 fps makes your game your game run in slow motion when you go below 40 which is dumb af, like wtf. Why make this stupid decision? I ran 60 for the most part but when it goes below that its more unplayable than the original one. Hell DS3 feels still great at 30 fps, unlike here. Oh well. Also I hope the weapon match making is fixed if it hasn't already.
Didn't know about that bug. Hype.
steamcommunity.com/app/570940/discussions/0/1694922345929838319/?tscn=1527893279
if anyone is interested.
The reason the game is locked to 60 fps and slows if you go under it is the same reason the original was locked to 30-game speed is tied to framerate. Clearly they decided that undoing ds1's sphaghetti code to separate game speed and framerate was not worth the dev time.
I was wondering why my game ran like its in slow motion. My PC aparently cant handle the "remaster" so i have 60 in some areas but then it drops to 40-35 in a second and everything slows down. Its a shame i was really excited to play this game.
had that bug and didnt knew it could be fixed so i refunded the game. Best choice by far never gonna buy dat shit remaster and hope from dies with cancer for making such a shit and insulting "remaster" which was released for keeping us busy until the next shit game dat isnt bloodborne 2
They should have just remade DS1 in DS3's engine, at least then it would look really good :/
It is the same engine and ds3 already had outdated graphics anyway
@@PTDarkSonic I'm sorry sir have you seen irithyll? That shit was pretty as fuck. DS3 looks really good.
@@Bakucryptid77 Take a look in the Abyss watchers cutscene,where the fucking capelooks literally like minecraft, and tell me it's not outdated
@@mikaelkenzo one bad texture =/= shitty looking
@@wallacesousuke1433 tá pucto kjjjj
Honestly i bought the game, i agree with everything you say, and I'm still having a lot of fun with it
This whole video is just a click bait title and random complaints he scrounged up over the internet.
Jacob Ellis it's a good video non the less
Jacob Ellis doesn't make the complaints any less valid though; plus, it's hardly random, this is a well put together video that's organised with thought put into it
666doomsday666 yeah same here
A game having a lot of flaws doesn't necessarily mean it can't be fun. I mean, lord knows Oblivion is flawed all to hell, and I fucking love that game. Even something like Fallout 4 has its moments.
"buT mAh dArK soUls"
Guys, you don't rate a remaster on the game. You rate it on how it compares to the original.
You forgot about the Lower Undead Burg Capra Demon skip. Basically the same as Sen's skip but it lets you skip the capra demon to get to the dephts, allowing you to upgrade your weapon without killing the actual boss.
What I want to say any dead cam glitches work. Probably afew other locations I missed too.
I'm betting one of the employees stayed at work when everyone left to keep in his favorite bugs.
im going to say it scholar of the first sin is a better remake/remastered and game then dark souls remastered it atleast you know did something other then add mods to the game as official content and in some case fail to be as good as the mods
cerberus189 OOOHH DAMN HE SAID IT
Definitely the better remaster at least. Wish it was more active
SotFS was really good compared to this
Honestly SOTFS barely changed anything actually important about the game. There’s some cool changes, but overall it really wasn’t that amazing or necessary. But the thing is that that wasn’t really the purpose of that particular remaster anyway. In the case of DSR, however, the expectation when you bring back an OLD game like this is that you’re doing so to bring it into the present day... I mean why bother otherwise? And unfortunately DSR really doesn’t meet that expectation. I’m happy to have it if only so that I can play the game online with people again, but realistically, it didn’t achieve what it really ought to.
SOTFS was at least fun since the level layouts were different. It wasn't great but it at least it was *something.*
I love how you can go from getting invaded by someone with 5 weapon levels over you to 11 weapons levels over in undead burg just by getting lucky with a black knight weapon drop or by picking up the astora strait sword
This video just got recommended for me as I've been watching a lot of DSR walkthroughs and stuff. The remaster was my first time playing DS, and I gotta say it was an amazing experience. But it's no remaster at all. I certainly didn't experience any of the bugs the og game had, but graphically and in pretty much every sense, it's the same damn game. Def not worth $40 and def no remaster. Fucking Fromsoft just put out the same game again but for current gen consoles
Yeah that’s why I bought it when it went on sale. DS is my favorite game of all time and I thought it was worth getting the entire game + DLC at a consistent frame rate for around 19 bucks. But it’s definitely not a good remaster, at the minimum they should’ve fixed lost Izalith and bed of chaos lol
@@ssj4rit they fixed blight town lag and that was good enough for me
I bought DSR after scholar of the first sin and ds3. I bought ds3 at game stop on sale just thinking I'll give it a try, and I loved the game so much I got scholar of the first sin and loved that one just as much, so I'll always be grateful for DSR for letting me experience all three of the games instead of just two of them. When I got DSR, I loved it just as much as the other two. I hated this video because it's trying to ruin a version of Dark Souls. A game that's heralded as one of the best video games ever made. This isn't how you get people to try out the game for themselves, which those new fans could also fall in love with the series like I did
It's not FromSoft that made the remaster. Bandai Namco hired some random ass Chinese corp. FromSoft are actually pretty cool. But Bandai likes money a lot
@@nickjones851 theres nothing wrong with shitting on a 3rd release of essentially the same game when they basically changed nothing
he specified THIS version and just the pc one
he's stated he was fine with the console versions as its getting it on things that dont have it and even suggested grabbing it on consoles if you havent played before but how they did it on pc was scummy taking off the old one completely and yknow we already got the "complete" edition with the prepare to die edition and then it got released again
just because he likes ds1 doesnt mean he cant criticize the bullshit the devs pull
how daresth thou call something Miyazaki touched once trash? rrRreEeEeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
the amount of people riding fromsoft's dick on this is insane
You know fromsoft didn't make the remaster?
But fromsoft didn't make this, some nobody studio in Europe did
ddGrandahl Miyazaki didn’t even touch this “remaster”.
Hence why I fucking said "touched once" ya dinguses
"DsR is good on consoles"
Except Xbox One already had Dark Souls 1
(And no, we didn't get a discount)
Xbox one couldn't get dsfix so essentially dark souls 1 on the xbox one before the remaster ran just as bad as dark souls 1 on the 360
bouta nut rn ikr
I just played through DS1 and id rather play that than DSR
Metao by all means, go play your downgraded trash. if youre really convincing yourself that the OG ds1 on xbox is better than the remaster, then you are objectively wrong and not worth debating. ill stick with the factually better version.
AH silver But you're objectively wrong, because DS:R doesn't really do much to upgrade the game. In fact, some of their changes will be a pain in the ass in the future. And also, you can't call the original game a "Downgrade", because IT CAME OUT BEFORE. It's been almost a decade since DS1 came out, and the fact they couldn't do more is completely bullshit. I do prefer playing DS1 on xbox one over DS:R on xbox one.
Then you're a fucking idiot. It runs at 60 frames in every part of the game with DSR. What're you some fucking hipster?
It would have bin nice if they actually remastered the game
they remaster demon souls but not dark souls
@@somm150 *remake
They fixed the elevator chains glitch in the network test...
Then they brought it back.
*W o r k i n g a s i n t e n d e d*
Soo, how long will it take for opponents of this video to realize it's addressed at the fact, that it's a shit remaster and not a shit game? My guess is the heat death of the universe.
Spiritrise the remaster is fine
Spiritrise So do you believe it is worth getting the game if I have never played the first one?
Silent Tiger 14 Sure, it's still a good game. It's just less then it could have been.
Spiritrise what about his clickbait title?
Mitch K If you've seen his "DSR is Insulting" you already know what exactly he meant to say with it. And if the title is your biggest gripe with the video, so be it.
BACKSTABUUUUUUUUUUUUU Remastered.
Xander 'The Wolf' *chainBACKSTABUUUUUUUUUU
Two points years after (I got DSR a few weeks ago with some friends during a steam sale). It most certainly was just a money grab, it probably cost them 1/100th of what making a new game would cost while charging a new game price. My friends and I have enjoyed playing it, most because we wanted to play through all the DS games together. They definitely could have fixed a lot more of the textures and bugs, especially with a $40 sticker price but until you pointed out how shit some of them look I didn’t even realize. Good video and fair points
Wow I actually, genuinely expected this to get Bloodborne/Dark Souls 3 graphics. What was I thinking, thanks for the heads up.
@@youlikefeet fuck you
youlikefeet, would highly disagree. The ONLY reason I was able to play through or even attempt DS1 remastered was because I wanted to connect get a better understanding of the realm after playing DS3. By modern standards of gaming, I would hardly call DS1 Rem. "art". Not by PC standards and not by PS 4 console standards.
No, I am not referring to graphics, but an argument could be made on that front as well. I do mean "art", and by extension "art direction". DS1 is quite bland and to my eyes (DLC excluded) soporific in this respect. I prefer the dreary, glossy wet Gothic feel of Bloodborne and the object and building design (artistically) from DS3.
@@youlikefeet You're right, it doesn't...Bloodborne's art direction is MILES ahead of anything Dark Souls has managed to achieve.
@@youlikefeet you know, just because Bloodborne is a PS exclusive and you can't play it doesn't mean you can make up shit inside your head about how shit it must be. Makes you come off like a pathetic weirdo.
Time for DSR Fix^^
Kekse4Live Made by someone else, hopefully.
Alright Finished most of the Souls game with KB&M.
That includes :
1. Dark souls PtDE (dsfix, yes, but no mods that changed the controller input icon into a keyboard one.)
2. Dark Souls 2 SotFS
3. Dark Souls 3 (beat midir on 3rd try which was awesome)
4. Sekiro (still waiting for dlc)
Honestly only the 1st run is difficult until somewhere in the middle part where my muscle memory just remember every input automatically.
Did you play Bloodborne?
you should try playing original ds2, if you have free time. Completely different game
God I forgot how good lobos was at taking a loss like that. It really does take another kinda dude to get a bug like that and not walk away from the game entirely.
its lobos, pretty sure dude can run the game in like 5 minutes at this point
Is the Ash Lake thing actually a bug? I thought it was intended that the ominous chanting started when you looked at the equally ominous sky.