The ULTIMATE Philosophy Iceberg Explained
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
- Thank you all for watching, I hope you enjoyed the video and the new editing style! Subscribe and like for more :)
Thank you for watching, subscribe and like for more!
My editor - / kirin66
THE HELL BRO? ALMOST 3 HOURS OF WORK??? ARE YOU STILL ALIVE BROTHER?
lol, writing and sourcing all this takes a lot more than three hours. I figure he likely spent several weeks full time to write this.
If nobody can beat goku, can Goku defeat nobody?🤔 Stay with me now.
We don't know because not enough information
Knowing goku he probably could haha
Wait who nobody ?
Indeed, nobody is undefeatable.
can u stu?
i love how you’ve sounded a bit more enthusiastic about the content your making recently :) i love this video so far (im listening while im at work)
I bet we're all either at work or sleeping
@@514BMXJay
I'm still not finished listening to the whole 162-minute-long video. I've listened to bits while working, taking a shower, walking the dogs, and eating. Also, I pause the video to sometimes comment.
Otoh, I've never listened to youtube videos while I'm falling asleep or sleeping. I like a fan blowing in my room and no other noises.
TIER 1: 1:08
TIER 2: 21:38
31:15 Mereology
36:10 Meta-ethics
Absolutely astounding! Deep, in depth, powerful and I love the improvements you’ve made over the first one, great work man, you’re really going places
Ive watched your vids since near the beginning and you legitimately have made a lot of progress not just in your tech quality/script/editing but your presentational skills have improved dramatically. Good job! 👍
Dank comment
Yesssss I’m so happy for him
Finally another philosophy iceberg to binge watch
i'm glad you remade this properly
Love these videos to listen to while I work or exercise! Getting the greatest pump while learning about foundationalism
This was so clearly written by chatgpt. So many repetitions and synonymous sentences
Bro it’s cool you acknowledge the short comings of the first vid and are remaking it at a higher quality. Great channel you deserve the subs you get
The fact this got recommended to me without me literally even having notifications on is mad
anyways another iceberg video
Keep up the good work brother
UA-cams algorithm is so fine tuned now that you honestly do not need to actually subscribe to channels anymore.
I just hit subscribe to show support
@@s0urp0wer5yeah daddy knows what we like
YT recommend depending on the video you watch
@ErdemtugsC Well yeah
This is the second video where I see you commenting exactly the same
This adds value to my philosophy degree. Thank you for remaking it.
I love your content so much! Thanks for making this
Absolutely love this breakdown! I've been digesting philosophy part by part for years and this is an excellent overview. Be sure to follow up any questions with further research on the topic. This should be a springboard into more specific field research. Those struggling to understand art should explore aesthetic philosophy. If you have a religious belief you hold strongly maybe start looking through theology as a whole to have some context for what you believe compared to others. Lots of other examples are implied but basically keep growing!!
Great video man, keep it up!
31:10 mereology (wow wasnt even in my spellcheck vocabulary) reminds me of the thought process of how examing atoms on a molecular level resembles vast similarities with observing planets and galaxies on a cosmeic level. Theres another term for the perpetual scaling in size that alludes me.
30 mins in for this to be my first video of yours and you earned my sub. My only suggestion would be time stamps really benefits a video like this.
Adding in my thoughts on optimistic determinism and how it correlates with nature and nurture. The thought experiment of if the entire human race became deterministic would reflect heavily on a precedent for education through nature and nurture.
Overall Great work and well put together!
Wow great comment. Thanks for watching bro, hope to see you in comment sections in the future 👊
bro made a 3-hour long video to “correct his pronunciation” but still pronounced almost every philosophical term wrong 😔 “omni-science”
Fuck I got hung up on "causally" I just can't
😢
You didn't have to say that
THIS I FELL ASLEEP LAST NIGHT WATCHING THIS AND ALL I CPULD HEAR WAS HIM BUTCHERING WORDS 😂😂😂
yeah im 10 minutes in and this is just unbearable and sad. he needs to rewrite his script too bc it sounds like he made a ton of spelling errors, and if he didn't, he should just use an AI voiceover at this point because this is somehow worse. seriously got me wondering if he's dyslexic or has never seen a dictionary. anyways, i'm sparing my ears from this garbage, leaving a dislike, and finding something better.
Great overview of philosophy's critical branches! Emphasizing epistemology and metaphysics not only deepens our understanding of the world but also enhances our decision-making processes, which is crucial for personal and professional growth. 🌟
A friendly and respectful suggestion if you don't mind, before you do another video about philosophy, look up the pronunciations of the names of the philosophers, and the schools of thought.
keep blessing us with this
Awesome video. Quite an improvement
Lmfao. I just watched your 25-minute-long philosophy tier list yesterday, and my last comment basically boiled down to, "Bro, this could a much longer video with a much better rubrick of some kind, and maybe the rubrick could be made by seeing how philosophy is broken into fields." Then you released this nearly 3-hour-long beast. 😅 It's eerily as if you heard my comment and were like, "Okay, let's release the BIG ONE." I haven't watched all the way through yet (released to public only 44 minutes ago), but I'm sure it's way more in-depth than the tier list, and I'm guessing the video will probably cover the idea (another thing I commented about on the tier list video) that these philosophies are complexly overlapping. Many of these philosophies overlap or lead back and forth to one another. I see modern or contemporary philosophies as one large system of thought, or one big interlinked conversation about what the hell is happening in this universe. Thanks.
Good job, you just made a comment longer than the video that you didn't watch. You should go make some IRL friends
How do you mispronounce all these words having investigated enough for a 3hr vid. 🤦🏼♂️
He found the iceberg and input each entry into ChatGPT.
because he didn't do any research, he used a prompt. A big signifier on wether or not someone cares about what they talk about is pronunciation
Ya usually these guys will either use ai or plagiarize something someone already wrote up on the subject
It's super distracting
Awesome work! Surely did not feel like 3 hours to listen to. :)
Bro you post this while I'm in the middle of work ;-;
philosophy is cool ;) loved it man
another great video from Snooki.
"Casuality" 😂❤
Must be hard to spell everything right with 3 hour script
What does your video title mean?
Ignoring the entire content of a 3 hour video to correct 1 word you can clearly understand what it was supposed to be. Even said jokingly with love being a grammar nazi is just kinda lame and really undercuts everything said
@@nerdcorner2680 no. It clearly alienated most people who he's trying to talk to. That's kinda disrespectful
@@nerdcorner2680I can point out how stupid your defense of the video is. Wanna hear it dummy
@@nerdcorner2680he is calling the entire video scripted. What is really sad is the author being AI GENERATED SHIT. he cant pronounce half his words right. youd think youd have use a word first before using it in a ‘script’
Truth is a made up story, it can also be facts.
A deep dive of philosophy like this begs the question of if it is all pointless, if we are “thinking too deep about nothing” (spoiler alert philosophy is needed).
Many will brush off philosophical questions as unapplicable to real life, a purely meaningless theoretical that only distracts from reality. Their main evidence being that you can imagine what does not exist. When you do imagine, question, etc without checking the real world, eventually (or instantly) you will become entirely divorced from reality and so become meaningless.
But on the other side of the coin, knowledge by itself is meaningless. Let’s say a person only knows that a cup filled with water is easy to drink from. Sure they can use this knowledge to drink from the cup and be satisfied for life. But with simple questioning they could imagine a bigger cup and create that or a lid for the cup to keep the water for later, etc. Knowledge is only good for the exact moment it is needed. Even if you have two puzzle pieces of knowledge, missing the connecting piece, it is impossible to find this clear hole without some level of questioning and thought. (The old urban legend of NASA spending billions of dollars to make a pen work in space while USSR just used pencils, you can have all the knowledge you need to solve this problem but miss the solution without thought).
All of reason is based on philsophy, and is impossible to exist without. Reason needs to be justified through thought, questioning, and debate.
So take this as a love letter to your video and to philosophy itself, as it is the most important part of who we are, and it is not some form of “thinking too deep” it is truth
Mr goofer, u used metapgysics logic, which IS meaningless. We use 'meaningless knowledge' to interact with ppl, its existing because we exist(society), if we close eyes on why it exists it automatically seems 'meaningless', while in truth ur talk is meaningless. hehehhaw
Me about ur analysis of knowledge
Also, go check 1st question(and its 3 levels) of philosophy and lectures, its better than goofy icebergs or things made to satisfy our wantings(popular philosophy)
Essentialism basically states that there are core characteristics which are necessary for a person or thing to be that person or thing. A table can be made of many different materials, and come in different sizes and colors, but there are specific criteria that it retains to remain a table. The best analogy I can think of is a species holotype in biology, it's a representative of the characteristics that separate it from all other species. I hope that helps.
What's with the weird sfx at 40:40? Scared the shit out of me lmao
Wanted to make sure you were paying attention lmfao
So atomic time is defined by the cycles of radiation around a cesium 133 atom, in which one “second” equals 9,192,631,770 cycles, right?
Now there’s the theory of observation in quantum mechanics that states, “by the very act of watching, the observer affects the observed reality.”
Stick with me- so time in itself can be observed and affected just by observing it. Basically a gritty, detailed version of why when we are focused on time and how slowly it’s moving, we are actively slowing time in our perception of reality.
Please bro make a video on reddit creepy stories your narration was awesome, continue the series ❤
How can one man mispronounce so many words? Impressive.
I think he does it on purpose lol
By reading a lot but never hearing people say the words he's reading, simple as
Or it's a running joke with his channel idk
Some funny pronunciation but I appreciate the video haha. Leaving a comment for the algorithm
37:45 My understanding of essentialism is imagine a chair, there are many different kind of chairs, expensive ones, made of gold, or cheap ones made of wood, or even just a wood stump. but they are all "chair" and are univercially reconised chair, there for there must be a "ideal, perfect chair that is the most chair of all chair" out there, the esscences of a chair, what makes a chair chair if you will.
This also apply to eveything, like the "ideal idea of a circle" or "ideal idea of language" so on and so forth.
Some ideas: Mistifications, linguistics, Forbidden Literature, Literature, cosmology and astrophysics, anthropology, videogame theories
yay new video
*clicks on video*
"phil-"
*an ad plays*
You get me through work.
I think that this video should have +15 minutes and +2 tiers and this could be perfect
Bro remaking a video to correct pronunciation and grammatical errors and then still mispronouncing and using wrong words is so on brand for this type of UA-camr
nice, although it is complicated to do low levels of a philosophical iceberg without reaching Deleuze and Guattari, CCRU and maybe the more schizo and perhaps mystical areas of philosophy
That was fantastic it didnt feel like 3 hrs tbh
Mology, sounds like the idea that all things are made of other things, with current science we understand that the smallest we can examine currently are phantom particles and quarks, even smaller somehow those are also made of "things". Currently the theory is that matter is made of energy (vibration/movement/heat/light etc...) that has transferred or lost enough momentum to be observed as "matter" or a thing that can be physically interacted with. Currently that is the dead end on the side of smaller pieces, although it is theorized that due to any measurable amount of space actually has an infinite amount of space, may mean that there could possibly be more smaller parts of what we can interact with that we currently have no technology that could verify this, as a tool to measure such small things requires nearly just as small things hitting them AND bouncing back to a sensor and enlarging the after image. Regardless it's simply theory. Similarly just as difficult to imagine or study, is the big side of things. As your tissues are made of cells, your body is made of tissues. The idea is that even if we don't know we are part of a larger organism or substance, it does not disprove the theory. This theory also hypotheses that things are part of INFINITELY larger things, and so on and so forth. Essentially, Mology is the idea that all things are separate yet connected in ways we simply have no way to observe, allmost as if its a 3D infinitely large fractal of infinitely different materials, made of infinitely smaller and unique materials. The value of this can be many things if not anything. We currently understand that different "unnatural" materials may be synthesized with natural materials put into specific shapes and builds of the smaller pieces, meaning that if we could effectively see, and move smaller and smaller materials, then we can effectively convert or even synthesize anything we want in the material and energetic spectrum. The idea additionally delves into the idea that the fabric of space itself is a legitimate material we can not sense, and the building blocks of the material or even the material itself could potentially reshape or change energy density and become matter itself. If such things are possible, my own theory is that space is a highly energetic ocean of unimaginably small "things" and so if some of these things slow down enough, flow would be disrupted, causing a massive shift in materials and eneries from the point of change and causing a chain effect out in a 3d bubble shaped wave in all directions. This idea would explain the concept of how and why eventually space may implode on itself. Matter would be made by the bumbing into of space into space, eventually this bumping slows down to a halt, and at that point, whatever the base version of space is would start to seep back into what we know as our space, and rebalance the energy causing the materials to return to its original state. This would also explain the idea of infinite big bangs, as space would be an infinite area full of this material/fabric, and energy must move somewhere, and with infinite space, energy would never stop moving entirely, at least not all at once. Anyway, philosophy itself is a wonder example of this as well, there and many of them and they are all unique in their own way, yet they are all a part of a larger truth or idea that could be infinitely complex.
"casuality"
3 minutes in and it’s been bothering me so much lol
@@xxcoolyo10xxNow how u feel about it
i thought he was saying kazuality at first
Amazing
Thank you brother for all this information and your hard work to even form it all together 🫡🫡🫡
Philosophys cool.
30 minute videos are good, but I do like these long form two plus hour videos every now and then.
Very cool
Great audio quality this time
19:00 maybe it's my bias, but I think it would be interesting, cool, or perhaps wise to add Peter Singer's expansion of moral consideration to all sentient beings. I'm not vegan or vegetarian, and there are no AI or robotic sentient beings yet, but I think it's a good plan to include all sentient beings in our moral considerations. It's also shows how ethics continues to develop.
Tao sux
Tf yall talking about
Is there right and wrong in music?
@@malamstafakhoshnaw6992
Simply put, there seems to be no right or wrong in music. Music can be almost anything. It helps if the music follows convention & norms so listeners can recognize that it's music, but music can be very diverse.
Why?
FAVORITE UA-camR.
I just wanna say good shit for acknowledging the shortcomings of previous videos and improving!
Wh do I remember you having 10k subs
NICE VIDEO
Yooo snook philosophy drop 🗣️‼️‼️
🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️
I wouldn't worry too much about pronunciation after norepinephrine i would just go with it and make it your thing
I listened to Alan Watts for years. One day I realized it actually had no value, basically just background noise....
Great! And pretty soon, when your existential time of the month comes, you'll need some ego death😂
Your loss
Just met this guy on one tv he’s pretty cool
Man I’m just tryna be cracked at chivalry 2 not unravel life’s greatest mysteries while I define a entirely new play style in the funny sword game
Babe wake up the crew new snook juat dropped!
at its core at its core at its core
Could you please consider adding timestamps to the video?
11:45 haha, yeah, some of it is pretty wild, but I think you and I can agree that "modern art" isn't a monolith. There are so many different kinds of "modern art" that it's hard for me to say one, general thing about all of it. One particular example (I think we can agree is included in "modern art") is Afremov's oil paintings. I guess he counts a bit toward impressionism (he doesn't fall neatly in that category, but it's close), and I find a lot of impressionism very nice. The abstract impressionism gets kind of hard for me to enjoy, but so long as I can reocognize what's occurring in the artwork, then I'm farily satisfied.
Also, I think it's important to repcgnize how "modern art" is at least three major categories (late 19th century to about 1970s (Afremov might even be counted as "contemporary" due being newer than "modern art")): cubism (which I find kind of odd, but interesting), expressionism (some of this is very cool or interesting art but can be a bit abstract for me), impressionism (probably my favorite one of these three so long as it's not too abstract). There are other groups going on (absurdism, surrealism, dada, fauvism, futurism...). I guess you might find all of them odd or uninteresting. That's okay, I guess. 😅
All of that said, if you enjoy forms of classical or neo-classical art, then I get it. They're very well made and can be very beautiful and deeply meaningful.
I think another part of how come art got so wild is that folks saw enough classical and neo-classical art, and they simply wanted something new. It had to test or break old boundaries. It had to show complex, chaotic life in a nonstructuralist manner. It had to be "new" art. Who knows if this is overall a good development? A patron can pay artists to create any genre they like to have made these days: just find an artist you like that does commission work and pay for it to get done. It may or may not turn out exactly how you want it. 😅 That's usually a rich person kind of activity depending on how popular the artist is..
====
A few days later, at 30:15, I noticed you have an Afremov painting in your video. Do you like or not like Afremov? Is he not modern or even contemporary? When you say you don't like modern art, are there exceptions to this statement? 😅
Tao sux
@@malamstafakhoshnaw6992
Would you like to explain further or is that all you have to say as a reply for my three comments? 😁
Sure, your subjectvity on an in essence an objective matter.
@@malamstafakhoshnaw6992
Okay. What's my subjectivity on what objective matter that you're telling me sux?
Art and philosophy.
Take a shot whenever he mispronounces a word! I died in the first 15 minutes
The Ultimate Sleepberg
philosophy is verbal gooning
Argument, proposition, term
...
Term is sign from which simple proposition is made, and sign is that which represents to a cognitive power something other than itself. Proposition, is speech in which truth and falsity is found. And an argument is speech from which something else necessarily follows. And consequently an argument is made of two parts that from which something follows, which is called antecedent, and that which follows, called consequent. When I say: 'Whatever produces a round shadow is itself round. Earth produces a round shadow. Therefore, Earth is round.' The antecedent is the part before "therefore" and the consequent, the part after it.
Division of Philosophy: Modern and Traditional;
With this much said we can talk about the two divisions of philosophy. What is calling government is divided into tyrannical, democratic, etc. as being kinds of governments as well as executive, legislature and judiciary as being it's parts. Likewise philosophy is divisible into modern and traditional in its kinds and natural philosophy, logical philosophy and moral philosophy.
Kinds of dance are distinguished into traditional and modern, so too with philosophy, being divided into modern philosophy and traditional philosophy. Modern means recent and comes from 'modus', and traditional means transmitted and comes from 'tradere' which means transmitted. Modern and traditional philosophy can also be divided into parts but the utility of which a division might only be neeeded in the whatever context which a division is made. The way in which modern philosophy is sometimes divided is logic, epistemology, aesthetic, metaphysics and ethics but this is more like the division that arises from object to which attention happen to be paid just like in linguistics is united by the fat that their area of study is language each branch is demarcated as distinct from another based on what about language they happen to study, for e.g. it is based on what they study that phonetics and phonology are marked out as distinct from syntax, morphology, pragmatics, etc. while the manner in wich they study sound itself distinguishes phonetics and phonology from eachother, for phonetics studies sound in isolation but phonology in some relation.
In the partition of philosophy into three, by 'natural'. It is meant that it is not made by man, thus natural philosophy includes mathematics, metaphysics and general physics and its parts. Logical philosophy studies concepts as they are ordered among themselves while moral philosophy studies voluntary ad actions in so far as they are ordered to an end.
Hey babe, wake up. Snook just posted
Cool
omni-science or omniscience (ahm-ni-shents)?
philosophy is cool
fr
comment for laterrr looks goooood
Never have i agreed with you more on a belief snook than your take on modern art.
When a 2 year old is capable of more artistic ability, you know they've lost the plot.
"thesiss ship" lmaoo
WHAT WORDS ARE HIS?
"Empherical"?
Cool video, but the part about antinatalism taking over 1.5 hour is a bit much.
Do bro know he’s on the listen while you sleep algorithm
(I can’t go to sleep with one of his videos at 24 years old)
Bruh this is interesting. But pls, hire someone to edit or watch it first to help with mispronounciations.
Zara-thrust-ah
The video got a Climate change context notice lol.
yay!
A laudable effort, though if a word is in your script you should know how to pronounce it.
If I think I’m sigma therefore I am sigma
Omniscience is pronounced om-nish-ence for future reference (:
day late but wsp
sigh* 2 hours of my life gone
paradox iceberg next vid
already made it. But I love that video fr
@@Snook_YT ohh i see , guess ill check it
Sin is part of their job
“Metaphysicians”
Let goo
Pack it up chidi
I don't know why the script sound like it's been written by chatgpt but I still appreciate the effort nevertheless.
I had a sneaking suspicion about that, too, but I have no solid evidence of it. 😅 We live in a time of AI-genned content. How will we ever tell? Also, so many people are consuming AI-genned content, and now their minds contain AI-derived content. There's soon going to be little or no separation between our thoughts, minds, ideas, and content of AI. It's an odd and interesting time to be alive. 😅
Metamodernism rules!
Dr. Snook
Philosophy =cool? Maybe