Is this applicable for cooking pan mixer? The pan is hemisphere shape unlike the tank which is cylinder. I'm very lost on the calculation of my project. I don't really know if this is applicable for low scale low speed. Like 20 rpm, my calculations always end with below 1 watts I'm so fucked up please help.
Sir, Is this calculation specific to liquid mixing only? If so, could you please suggest the approach for power or torque calculation in a waste (solid) agitator? Additionally, if you have any book recommendations on this topic, I would appreciate it..😊 Thank you in advance.
Reference texts as well as CFD and other studies published on net indicate that baffling always increases the power consumption. However your calculation shows otherwise. Any clarity on the conditions this could happen?
Your observation is true .......but In every standard book i have observed same analogy that have given. May be we should understand this way. For the same power better mixing/suspension/agitation is observed for baffled tank compared to unbaffked tank. So they have to go for higher power for unbaffked tank for same mixing conditions
Dear Dr. Surendra. Do you have a book with specific information about this designe? i have a lot interest in agitator for applications in industry. Let me know if you have a personal contact.
Thank you sir. I have read two books to teach to btech students. 1. Mechanical operations by Anup k swain 2. Unit operations of chemical engineering by MCcabe smith. In MCcabe you can find graphs for the impeller for finding power numbers
Very informative videos
So nice of you
Is this applicable for cooking pan mixer? The pan is hemisphere shape unlike the tank which is cylinder. I'm very lost on the calculation of my project. I don't really know if this is applicable for low scale low speed. Like 20 rpm, my calculations always end with below 1 watts I'm so fucked up please help.
Sir,
Is this calculation specific to liquid mixing only? If so, could you please suggest the approach for power or torque calculation in a waste (solid) agitator? Additionally, if you have any book recommendations on this topic, I would appreciate it..😊
Thank you in advance.
Reference texts as well as CFD and other studies published on net indicate that baffling always increases the power consumption. However your calculation shows otherwise. Any clarity on the conditions this could happen?
Your observation is true .......but In every standard book i have observed same analogy that have given. May be we should understand this way. For the same power better mixing/suspension/agitation is observed for baffled tank compared to unbaffked tank. So they have to go for higher power for unbaffked tank for same mixing conditions
Sir Can you provide the charts or empirical correlation from which we get 'n' value...
It is available in many books....unit operations of chemical engineering by MCcabe smith
Dear Dr. Surendra.
Do you have a book with specific information about this designe?
i have a lot interest in agitator for applications in industry.
Let me know if you have a personal contact.
Thank you sir. I have read two books to teach to btech students. 1. Mechanical operations by Anup k swain 2. Unit operations of chemical engineering by MCcabe smith. In MCcabe you can find graphs for the impeller for finding power numbers
Amazing teacher
Thank you and Keep watching
how u get number of "n" i really get confused🥲
It will come from empirical correlations and charts for different contexts. For this specific example n is given in the problem i have referred