Shooting the Same Film as Christopher Nolan on Oppenheimer | CineStill BwXX 120
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 сер 2024
- Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer was one of this summer’s biggest theatrical releases. And if you don’t know, they shot a portion on that with using specially made Kodak Eastman Double-X for IMAX 65mm cameras. In this video, we take our BwXX 120 black & white film stock - which is the exact same emulsion and a similar size - and try to recreate some images that were used in the movie. Watch as @linusandhiscamera and Brian, with the help of our model Christian, spend the day showing you how they use this film stock to create images inspired by the motion picture.
📽 After the shoot, Linus and Brian make it to the CineStill Studio to dive deeper into the photos they shot. Watch the full video review here: • PHOTO REVIEW: Shooting...
🎞️ Purchase a few rolls of CineStill BwXX 120 here: cinestillfilm.com/collections...
==============
0:00 - Intro
2:37 - Sepulveda Dam
6:01 - Lenses and equipment used to shoot Oppenheimer
6:31 - Missile Site
8:33 - Outro
==============
CREDITS:
Host / Photographer 1: Linus Johnson - / linusandhiscamera
Photographer 2: Brian Wright - / bwrightphoto
Model: Christian Davis - / photo.papi
Camera Op: Branden Wilson - / hippiebranden
Editor: Lou Ressel - / upstatelouyork
Editor: Linus Johnson - / linusandhiscamera
Producer: Arvin Santiago - / its.ar.vin
Executive Producer: Steve Carter - / stevecarter
Let us know what other questions you have about this film and what you would like to see a video about! Comment below and let us know, and don't forget to subscribe to the channel so you don't miss any new videos: ua-cam.com/users/cinestillfi...
______________________________________________________________________
TAGS: film photography, film development, cinestill film, cinestill, cine still, kodak, fujifilm, ilford, adox, foma, agfa, linusandhiscamera, shooting film, cinestill 800t, analog photography, film, film camera, 120 film, 120 film photography, medium format, cinestillfilm, developing film, cinestill 50d, cinestill bwxx, xx, bwxx, 50d, 800t, 400d, #OPPENHEIMER , #CINESTILL #BwXX
______________________________________________________________________
Don't miss any new videos, subscribe to the CineStill Channel here:
ua-cam.com/users/cinestillfi...
This video features music licensed from great artists found on @themusicbed - use our special link to get your own subscription: share.mscbd.fm/cinestillfilm
Follow us on social media:
/ cinestillfilm
/ cinestillfilm
/ cinestillfilm
For all things film, chemistry, scanning, and more, visit us at cinestillfilm.com - Фільми й анімація
There is nothing more pleasurable than shooting on celluloid. The video is amazing and the pictures you took are also amazing. Keep it up! 👏
The “Texas Leicas” and Cine Still BwXX ….sweet!
You forgot DoP Hoyte van Hoytema.🤔
These are amazing! I'm taking out a roll of BwXX tomorrow to the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum, shooting with my Rolleiflex 2.8F and developing in Diafine!
What a great combination! Enjoy that and definitely tag us when you share. We'd love to see the results! 🖤
i love this!! great concept and i love all the information! beautiful results
Thank you so much, much needed information!
What fine contrasts. I love it.
That vignette on Brian's lens is craziness. Linus, you're shots were cool too lol. Nice video guys!
Really cool shots! I was hoping somebody would do a shoot like this.
Great video!!
A+
Yeah, Brian won. I don't mean to compare, but his shots are really something else.
he’s amazing - his knowledge of film photography paired with a self-made camera is truly so special!! happy to let him bask in this win 😂
What did u rate the film at?
Brian rated all 3 of his at ISO 125 and pulled all 3 of his 1 stop. Linus rated his rolls at ISO 400. You can see more about how they were shot and processed here: ua-cam.com/video/AamtYV_Lj4I/v-deo.htmlsi=Jxu6jfxwS4uIx-Mi&t=6
@@CineStillFilm thank you so much. Great work.
I'm still confused why its called 70 mm , if the actual film is 65 mm????
65mm is *negative* width. 70mm is positive *print* width. Perforation center to center distances exactly the same.
Reason: Historical. 65mm wide was devised in the 1930's as the MGM 'Grandeur' format.
In the 1950's, TODD-AO was devised that use 6-channel sound recorded on magnetic stripes both inside and outside the perforations. The extra 2.5mm on each side of a 70mm print to accommodate those soundtracks. Same format used for Super Panavision up thru the 1980's for 5-perf 70mm releases. (Now 70mm sound is on a synchronized CD or other means).
Fun factoid: The Russians use 70mm for both negative and positive. NASA used 70mm for rocket photography but the perforations are located near the film edge. Different perforation locations referred to as TYPE 1 and TYPE 2.
this is not a competition you guys are making some art not playing a sport
Hey, only four months late.
My favorite film but I've only shot it in 35mm. It's tempting to get a good medium format camera just to try this one. And I love DF96 Monobath.
You'll love shooting BwXX in medium format! If you'd like to see BwXX 120 in action with some helpful info and example photos, we made a video about it that you can watch here: ua-cam.com/video/ZYA5QoXNuto/v-deo.html