Yup, I too think that this bit needs some clarification. The Tesla did stop for it and the Volvo did stop at the cardboard Elon so the hollowness argument is questionable.
Shape has much much more weight than size in any neural network, in fact, the Tesla stopping for the kangaroo could mean it wrongfully detect it as a small human.
The Volvo seemed to start braking, and then reduce the braking as it moved closer to the target. I would speculate that it is to leave more space behind itself to reduce the chances of another vehicle behind running into you.
That's exactly right! Although I don't work for Volvo, I worked for another OEM on these Active Safety Systems. These are closed loop systems and we try to achieve target avoidance while also giving enough space for the person behind to avoid hitting you! Most manufacturers target 0-2m away from the target.
A Tesla actually saved my life on a roundabout. I was on a bike and the Tesla’s driver accelerated while I was passing right in front of him. Thank you Tesla!!
One minor crash and the Tesla will explode and kill you, there are thousands of videos showing them going up like a firework and the emergency services cannot put the Lithium fires out, would you put faith in a battery at £3?, it only needs one to fail out of the 100,000 or so to wreck your car, possibly other cars near it and kill you. No one with any kind of experience/knowledge in Lithium batterys would buy a Tesla, its a dumb move.
After crunching car fire statistics and sales data, the authors of the study found that hybrids actually have more fires per 100K sales, with: Hybrid vehicles: 3,474 fires per 100K salesGas vehicles: 1,529 fires per 100K salesElectric vehicles: 25 fires per 100K sales Although electric vehicles (EVs) may not catch fire as often as other vehicles, when they do catch fire, they can be extremely difficult to extinguish and cause much more damage. This has to do with the battery, which we’ll talk about more in a moment.
@@richardcorns8553 The fire stats are still early days, these cars batteries cells will start failing 3-5 year after purchase, just one small cell can in theory short out the battery and ignite it, we will start seeing lots of burning Teslas as people wear them in. Thats my prediction.
@@suzesiviter6083 You’re funny. Like you’ve said correctly, only in theory one battery cell can ignite the whole pack. Every cell has its own fuse. If one cell fails the battery pack will be just fine. In theory one faulty injector in an ICE could also ignite the whole vehicle but that’s also not transferable to the real world. The statistics proof you wrong and extinguishing battery fires in the unlikely case that it happens is also not as difficult as portrayed by the media.
@@suzesiviter6083 You do realise that Tesla has been producing cars since 2009? So by your idea we should be seeing a disproportionate amount of Tesla fires vs ICE fires, which is not the case - actually the opposite.
would've been interesting to test how the cars would react to a moving "dog" and "cat". Maybe the sensors are made to react to movement as well, which might have changed the cars to actually stop.
This is true, and also the scary thing about machine learning. It can make incorrect assumptions in cases it has not been trained on. It can also make very good assumptions if there's enough surrounding supporting data, but when there's not there can serious consequences.
The Tesla safety systems are awesome! I was just rear ended at 50mph a few weeks ago and my car steered to keep me from going into oncoming traffic after I was hit, it also coasted to a stop to extend the time of impact which makes the rebound force less, and when it came to a stop it put the flashers on, cracked all windows about 3 inches and shut off the battery. It also automatically saved the video of the accident with a report of coordinated and where it was hit and that airbags were near deployed and I got a call from Tesla making sure I was alright and if I needed Tesla service help. I can’t wait to get my car back after it is repaired!
If you are rear ended, you should not coast along. Because that will make it more likely to get in another crash. Volvo: Car senses that you might be rear ended. It starts flashing rear lights. If nothing happens, it will pretension the seat belt and prepare the car for a crash. If you are stationary, the car will apply FULL brake pressure. And when crash happens, it will of course use explosive pretentioners, apply airbags where necessary, put on hazard lights, unlock the doors, make an emergency call to emergency services, send out a warning to other Volvos nearby so it shows up on their dash board that a car close has emergency light on (to prevent you from running into the car, in like a blind corner or something) and if BEV/Hybrid, it will of course disconnect high voltage. On a petrol or diesel, it will shut off fuel pump and fuel line valves.
@@thefortnitecuh4900 That Tesla action above, rolling forward, is less safe than coasting along. But something is strange by this described rear ending: 50 mph? I have no idea about that strange customary unit, except that 50 mph is pretty fast. If you are rear ended at that speed, the car is not something you can repair... And near airbag deployed? That is, odd... Seems like he/she was not rear ended at 50 mph, and if so, the driver of the rear ended car was travelling like 45 or so... Or he/she was stationary and the car behind almost came to a stop.
I used to official test these systems for an OEMs. It may seem stopping further away is better, but that's not always the best. It may seem counter intuitive, but keep in mind there may be vehicles behind you and you also want to give them enough space to avoid you. Hence manufacturers typically try to balance braking distance between 0-2 meters away from the target.
I disagree.. if the car behind you cannot stop when you are 4-6 meters away from target, it cannot stop at 0-2 meters either.. the Volvo started breaking later. Meaning the distance the car behind had to stop would have been the exact same in both situations. However, if the car behind hit the Tesla, it might not get pushed into the pedestrian or car in front due to some extra leeway.
@@HOFFERN342 Wrong assumptions. As I said, it's a closed loop system. The distance the car has to brake behind is more with Volvo because Volvo takes longer to brake by letting off the brakes a bit. Tesla ADAS system appears to request max braking from the brake controller here and that's about it.
@@peterg4205 It may have been both. There are TTC (Time to Collison) calibrations in these vehicles to determine when to brake. You typically want to set those as late as possible to prevent nuisance braking. But if the conditions are right, the closed loop system will decrease the amount of braking it requests from the brake controller if it detects that it will have enough space to avoid the target with less braking. This is all actively calculated based on the rate of deceleration it's seeing during the emergency stop.
The seat belt tensioners in my V90 can be quite alarming when activate. They really pull hard. My car has twice done an emergency stop when a large bird, probably a pigeon, flew across the path of the car. In one case it fully stopped. In the other it sharply slowed, then release the brakes as the bird passed. Both occasions were at maybe 30MPH.
So now we need to be careful of people 'emergency stopping' on a straight road because a bird flies past? There's enough idiots on the roads without cars being dangerous on their behalf.
I love this video! Very unbiased. What should also be stated that is far too often understated, is that the driver ultimately is accountable for the safety of themselves and others. Automatic mitigations such as autopilot and FSD are just that. Electronic systems designed to improve safety. Tesla and other manufactures require you to agree to disclaimers that they are not infallible, and that the driver is always accountable in the end. I believe we are still a ways off from transferring any risk to automation.
Nearly most entertaining Episode. Great and crazy ideas for this Test at the same time. Can't stop laughing. Nearly spilled my cofe through my nose! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
These are lab conditions too. Stuffed animals are not a realistic subjects, cause they're transparent to the radar (even cardboard does much better) unlike real animals and humans that produce a clear radar signature.
It's unbelievable how safe new Cars have became a lot of new kids won't meet the old cars that didn't have airbags just seatbelts . Manufacturers nice job never do cutouts to human safety 👏
1. Radar is better at detecting moving objects. Would love a test with this to see if it makes a difference 2. Would be interesting to see the difference whilst the Tesla is on autopilot 3. Would love to see the test again when Using the vision system with the cars with no radar any more
You guys should actually test them until a certain speed whereby they actually crash into objects and those stop & go traffic whereby you accidentally release the brake pedal & whether the car will actually hit onto the object in front
Hello Vinod Bhandari, I hope that you are correct. What's needed is for all vehicles to stop for the roos! It's time to educate vehicles make safety the number one job when in notion!!!
My First thought at the first emergency braking was: "He just ruined his mother's safety score!" LOL. This video actually answered so many questions I've had. I really wanted to know if a Tesla would stop because I've seen videos of it stopping but I've also seen videos of it not stopping so I was wondering. Also, recently, I saw a video of a driver using his Tesla to ram another car to stop a kidnapping. I kept wondering why the Tesla wasn't stopping it. Your video answered that too! Kudos!
@@meriofrog Too bad about the FSD Beta. The Safety score is poorly implemented and can be very annoying too; You'll get dinged for things outside your control so it can be frustrating.
3:30 As we're expected on a Volvo. Longer time reaction for the people on the back if the dont have any automated emergency brake system, because it's applying the brake as the tesla does but actually stopping much closer within the car in front. And keeping your body intact with the seat also prevent some worst injuries that may happen with the loose seatbelt. Good job Volvo!
@@mediocreman2 Do you trust the vehicle on the back? I mean, bad weather equals longer reaction time. So the impact from the back would be greater if they do like the tesla does. Just take a look at "teslawhambam" channel and there are so many tesla that having the backend broken bcz of slight-to-harder impact and it cost up to 20,000 dollar to fix.
i actually think this kind of crash prevention system should be standard for every single car around the world without any cost. So many accidents will be prevented.
Having owned most luxury brand cars (Mercedes, Volvo, BMW, Audi, and Tesla) they all automatically brake just fine for my stop and go traffic situations just fine. I know the Mercedes and Volvo have the tightening seatbelt system. The best system for highway is Tesla AutoPilot and Volvos Pilot Assist. The rest don’t work as well.
I own a Tesla Model Y 2022 and it has a LOT of ghost braking. The system on Mercedes is better. The decision to remove the radar on a 62000€car was stupid.
I do have to say, my Model X did slam on the anchors for a cat, but it was legging it across the road at the time and not standing there waiting to die.
My parent's XC90 actually stopped at a dog that ran out of a driveway from around 40km/h, although that dog was a bit bigger than the stuffed animal in this vid
The reason the Volvo stops closer to the object is because that's how it's programmed - you're not meant to get used to letting the system activate, it's supposed to cut in at the very last moment for that specific reason to stop drivers abusing the system.
1:44 Actually, that car would not have radar as all M3s after early 2021 would not have radar/LiDAR, and would be completely run on Tesla Vision through the cameras.
Love the content. Are we sure this model 3 has radar however? They removed it and went to "Tesla Vision" in the 2021s Not sure about ones built in/for Europe though
almost every manufacturer got these systems. It's genious and great for the peace of mind! Makes the front recorder obsolete since you won't rear any other car and if someones hit you in the rear, it's their fault
i think size is key.. as imagine if a large bird flew past your front of your car .. it does an emergency stop and cause a serious accident. so i personally think its somewhat reassuring it doesnt emergency stop on small items such as birds or cats etc.
A good middle ground might be to brake for smaller animals, but to have a maximum amount of braking force; enough to give the animal a chance to run away (perhaps in unison with a very loud blast of frightening sound from the horn) but not full-on emergency braking. Even if you do still hit the animal, if you're driving at city/neighborhood speeds and the braking slows you some additional amount, the animal may live through the impact. And as an added precaution, disable the car from doing it at say, anything above 45mph or so, so that it doesn't risk doing so in a high-speed environment. And it also occurred to me that it might be nice if it was programmed to do the "frightening horn blast" only, for an animal that wasn't actuall in the road but was detected heading toward it or standing unsafely near the edge. I've seen situations where scaring a deer that's about to run into the road like that may save any following vehicles from hitting them.
i’m actually really curious to know if a Model 3 will allow you to hit a car or person in creep speeds like in a drive-thru. because i often have to creep forward very close to other cars to create room in the drive-thru and in traffic or even parking but i don’t want to be allowed to hit anything.
I had an interesting action from my old Audi A7 with auto braking. Driving along an empty country road and a torn open candy wrapper blew across in front of me, with the full open, metalized side toward me. The car hit the brakes, at least until it blew out of my path. Another consideration; Is there an infrared component to these safety systems? A person or animal would have a heat signature where the stuffed animals do not. Add a heater to the stuffed animals to see if it sees them better.
3:21 volvo is actually safer. Braking hard doesnt mean safety. Its more dangerous because people behind will hit you. Braking with more distance can avoid that. And volvo brake gradually softened while tesla is just hard full stop.
One time I was waiting at a red light and after it turns green, just as I was about to go, a pedestrian walked in front of me. Yes he checked the light and still chose to cross. I was mad so I started driving anyway. I wanted to scare him. Unfortunately my Mercedes braked automatically and even as my foot was depressing the gas peddle significantly, yes on purpose, the car just won’t fking move! I wish at that point the system didn’t work.
Hello Jaijaun Hou, I feel your frustration at not being able to scare the krap out of him. It's nice that you didn't hit him. I had a slightly different situation. I was waiting at a light and it turned green to allow me to drive. I made a right turn (right turn signal on and flashing white waiting for t light to change). While making the turn a pedestrian walked (with the green light) but he walked into the back half of the work van I was driving. Since I started from a dead stop I was not traveling at anything more than a slow pace. His reaction after hitting the van was to hit it with his fist. I stopped and Sked if he is was hurt. His reply implied that I deliberately attempted to run him down/run him over. I pointed out to him where he contacted the vehicle. It didn't mollify him. After hearing an angry horn symphony (from blocking the street) I drove away as there wasn't anything else that could do. I'm still puzzled after so many years have passed how and why he contacted the van?
Can confirm Volvo, and BMW AEB work well. 😂 Windows go up, seats go upright (in the BMW), seatbelts tighten front & rear, and the brakes slam on. 😂 Can confirm Ford's does not work. 😂
@@nirbhayatiwari5425 Oh yawn. We gotta do the "this is better than that" Jig? I'm sure one could confidently confirm the build quality of a BMW is better than Tesla..but we're not starting a shit fight.
The reason why both system doesnt stop for small animals is becasue that is intensional, sudden breaking for a small animal can cuase more harm to the driver as the car behind will need to break sudden aswell which will lead to a higher chance of more seriouse accident espcially at high speed. If you where on the high way going at 70mph and a fox jump out in front you wouldnt want your car to be breaking for it would you as the car behind will crash into you at these type of speed .
I'm pretty sure these braking systems don't turn on at 70mph in the first place so that would never happen. They would only turn on when driving around 30-37mph.
I don't understand this line of reasoning. Why not create a set of rules for this. If there is no car behind then break. Maybe it could just be a certain distance. Next, if its a small object then only complete this maneuver if acceleration doesn't exceed a certain amount.
My S class (2021 model) used to do emergency braking in the middle of nowhere without anything coming the other way… it was so annoying I sold the car!
Great video. I would just add information to the dog situation. The dog's colour (deep black, not reflective), and not just the size, might be possibly the reason why it was hit even by the Tesla. It doesn't stand out from the background. Just remember that Tesla uses the white road markings to keep in the lane. If you want to test this theory use a dog with another colour. For example I tried this out on an automatic hand dryer by putting on matt black gloves. The dryer simply wouldn't start, because it's sensors can not pick up the trigger light, as no light reflects back from the material. Without the gloves the dryer worked completely fine.
![Tesla Taxi FULL HEALTH CHECK: Is The Battery RUINED After 430,000 Miles? [Episode 4]](/img/n.gif)
7:19 - Fs in chat for Skippy 👇
First
F
Hey mat 😄
F D:
I Love Love Love this video
The seatbelt pre-tensioning was good and clearly shows the benefit it offers.
There are a lot of cars that have a device to fasten the belt when making a sudden stop using inertia, but Tesla doesn't have it?
Tesla's belts tighten as well at higher speeds. Mine tightens on the highway when I slow down abruptly.
@@Wankidy maybe not the model 3. i know that my dads audi a6 (2020) has that feature.
@@affectedrl5327 bro thats audi not tesla..german engineering😛😛😛
@@Wankidy All cars have different trim levels.
The Volvo ploughing through the kangaroo was pretty scary considering it was about the same size as a child
But kids aren't essentially hollow
@@lozetchells9164 And Elon Musk isn’t essentially a piece of cardboard 🤷♂️
Yup, I too think that this bit needs some clarification. The Tesla did stop for it and the Volvo did stop at the cardboard Elon so the hollowness argument is questionable.
Use your foot then you toss like every other car in the past
Shape has much much more weight than size in any neural network, in fact, the Tesla stopping for the kangaroo could mean it wrongfully detect it as a small human.
The Volvo seemed to start braking, and then reduce the braking as it moved closer to the target. I would speculate that it is to leave more space behind itself to reduce the chances of another vehicle behind running into you.
That's exactly right!
Although I don't work for Volvo, I worked for another OEM on these Active Safety Systems. These are closed loop systems and we try to achieve target avoidance while also giving enough space for the person behind to avoid hitting you! Most manufacturers target 0-2m away from the target.
A Tesla actually saved my life on a roundabout. I was on a bike and the Tesla’s driver accelerated while I was passing right in front of him. Thank you Tesla!!
One minor crash and the Tesla will explode and kill you, there are thousands of videos showing them going up like a firework and the emergency services cannot put the Lithium fires out, would you put faith in a battery at £3?, it only needs one to fail out of the 100,000 or so to wreck your car, possibly other cars near it and kill you. No one with any kind of experience/knowledge in Lithium batterys would buy a Tesla, its a dumb move.
After crunching car fire statistics and sales data, the authors of the study found that hybrids actually have more fires per 100K sales, with:
Hybrid vehicles: 3,474 fires per 100K salesGas vehicles: 1,529 fires per 100K salesElectric vehicles: 25 fires per 100K sales
Although electric vehicles (EVs) may not catch fire as often as other vehicles, when they do catch fire, they can be extremely difficult to extinguish and cause much more damage. This has to do with the battery, which we’ll talk about more in a moment.
@@richardcorns8553 The fire stats are still early days, these cars batteries cells will start failing 3-5 year after purchase, just one small cell can in theory short out the battery and ignite it, we will start seeing lots of burning Teslas as people wear them in. Thats my prediction.
@@suzesiviter6083 You’re funny. Like you’ve said correctly, only in theory one battery cell can ignite the whole pack. Every cell has its own fuse. If one cell fails the battery pack will be just fine. In theory one faulty injector in an ICE could also ignite the whole vehicle but that’s also not transferable to the real world. The statistics proof you wrong and extinguishing battery fires in the unlikely case that it happens is also not as difficult as portrayed by the media.
@@suzesiviter6083 You do realise that Tesla has been producing cars since 2009? So by your idea we should be seeing a disproportionate amount of Tesla fires vs ICE fires, which is not the case - actually the opposite.
Skippy was the most iconic guy in history of carwow and now.... He got ran over by a Volvo
My Swedish hearth is ripped apart
Hey he never died
would've been interesting to test how the cars would react to a moving "dog" and "cat". Maybe the sensors are made to react to movement as well, which might have changed the cars to actually stop.
Exactly what I was thinking
So a child (same size as the toy kangaroo) standing still is fair game?
A cat is only a cat if it moves???
The amount of people who just want to argue is funny
This is true, and also the scary thing about machine learning. It can make incorrect assumptions in cases it has not been trained on. It can also make very good assumptions if there's enough surrounding supporting data, but when there's not there can serious consequences.
When the Volvo hits skippy… I actually said ouch 😂
The Tesla safety systems are awesome! I was just rear ended at 50mph a few weeks ago and my car steered to keep me from going into oncoming traffic after I was hit, it also coasted to a stop to extend the time of impact which makes the rebound force less, and when it came to a stop it put the flashers on, cracked all windows about 3 inches and shut off the battery. It also automatically saved the video of the accident with a report of coordinated and where it was hit and that airbags were near deployed and I got a call from Tesla making sure I was alright and if I needed Tesla service help. I can’t wait to get my car back after it is repaired!
I do have a concussion and back pain but I feel like that’s to be expected when hit like that
amazing sorry about your tesla though :(
If you are rear ended, you should not coast along. Because that will make it more likely to get in another crash.
Volvo:
Car senses that you might be rear ended. It starts flashing rear lights. If nothing happens, it will pretension the seat belt and prepare the car for a crash. If you are stationary, the car will apply FULL brake pressure. And when crash happens, it will of course use explosive pretentioners, apply airbags where necessary, put on hazard lights, unlock the doors, make an emergency call to emergency services, send out a warning to other Volvos nearby so it shows up on their dash board that a car close has emergency light on (to prevent you from running into the car, in like a blind corner or something) and if BEV/Hybrid, it will of course disconnect high voltage. On a petrol or diesel, it will shut off fuel pump and fuel line valves.
@@Xanthopteryx what’s your point?
@@thefortnitecuh4900 That Tesla action above, rolling forward, is less safe than coasting along.
But something is strange by this described rear ending: 50 mph? I have no idea about that strange customary unit, except that 50 mph is pretty fast. If you are rear ended at that speed, the car is not something you can repair... And near airbag deployed? That is, odd... Seems like he/she was not rear ended at 50 mph, and if so, the driver of the rear ended car was travelling like 45 or so... Or he/she was stationary and the car behind almost came to a stop.
I used to official test these systems for an OEMs. It may seem stopping further away is better, but that's not always the best. It may seem counter intuitive, but keep in mind there may be vehicles behind you and you also want to give them enough space to avoid you. Hence manufacturers typically try to balance braking distance between 0-2 meters away from the target.
I disagree.. if the car behind you cannot stop when you are 4-6 meters away from target, it cannot stop at 0-2 meters either.. the Volvo started breaking later. Meaning the distance the car behind had to stop would have been the exact same in both situations. However, if the car behind hit the Tesla, it might not get pushed into the pedestrian or car in front due to some extra leeway.
@@HOFFERN342
Wrong assumptions. As I said, it's a closed loop system. The distance the car has to brake behind is more with Volvo because Volvo takes longer to brake by letting off the brakes a bit. Tesla ADAS system appears to request max braking from the brake controller here and that's about it.
@@kamilb8232 The video suggests that the volvo Reacted later, not that it took longer to stop.
@@peterg4205
It may have been both. There are TTC (Time to Collison) calibrations in these vehicles to determine when to brake. You typically want to set those as late as possible to prevent nuisance braking. But if the conditions are right, the closed loop system will decrease the amount of braking it requests from the brake controller if it detects that it will have enough space to avoid the target with less braking. This is all actively calculated based on the rate of deceleration it's seeing during the emergency stop.
@@kamilb8232 both wont save you from a driver on their phone behind you
The seat belt tensioners in my V90 can be quite alarming when activate. They really pull hard. My car has twice done an emergency stop when a large bird, probably a pigeon, flew across the path of the car. In one case it fully stopped. In the other it sharply slowed, then release the brakes as the bird passed. Both occasions were at maybe 30MPH.
So now we need to be careful of people 'emergency stopping' on a straight road because a bird flies past? There's enough idiots on the roads without cars being dangerous on their behalf.
Definitely won’t be buying a V90 then.
It can be disabled
The system in my XC90 has been brilliant. A dog ran out of a driveway and in front of the car and it had us stopped from about 30 in a jiffy
@@PhilBarrett789 if you manage to crash in to someone doing an emergency stop then youre driving to close...
7:51 that was actually so hilarious and so scary at the same time 😂😂
You guys never ceases to amaze us ❤️❤️
ua-cam.com/video/c0iqixa74p8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Miniaturecarcollector228%EF%A3%BF
ua-cam.com/video/rDdkqzJzxww/v-deo.html
Ok
ua-cam.com/video/c0iqixa74p8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Miniaturecarcollector228%EF%A3%BF
THEY HAVE TO FINALLY BOYCOTT THEIR RUSSIAN CHANEL?! SHAME ON THEM!!!
6:55 As an Australian, thank you for doing this test.
Don't buy a v90 recharge
Am I the only one who can't stop dying laughing at Skippy's death? 🤣🤣🤣
I love this video! Very unbiased. What should also be stated that is far too often understated, is that the driver ultimately is accountable for the safety of themselves and others. Automatic mitigations such as autopilot and FSD are just that. Electronic systems designed to improve safety. Tesla and other manufactures require you to agree to disclaimers that they are not infallible, and that the driver is always accountable in the end. I believe we are still a ways off from transferring any risk to automation.
Nearly most entertaining Episode.
Great and crazy ideas for this Test at the same time.
Can't stop laughing. Nearly spilled my cofe through my nose! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
nice to see that tesla does indeed build safe cars in realistic situations and not just under lab conditions
Black lab conditions?
So does volvo. Both cars detected that kangaroo and cat are fake no structure, no movement.
And ships cars without break pads
@@tsmatthx2 ?
These are lab conditions too. Stuffed animals are not a realistic subjects, cause they're transparent to the radar (even cardboard does much better) unlike real animals and humans that produce a clear radar signature.
Rest in peace skippy. A fellow Aussie. You have made your country proud.
stopping closer actually lowers chances of a rear collision as rear cars have longer time and distance to react
Hmm its right
If you stop closer because you start braking later then it doesn’t matter
It's unbelievable how safe new Cars have became a lot of new kids won't meet the old cars that didn't have airbags just seatbelts . Manufacturers nice job never do cutouts to human safety 👏
New kids are born too late.
I daily drive a 37 year old car that does not have ABS or airbags.
I remember as a kid our first family car didn't have seat belts in the back seats yet only the front ones had belts.
Ours 2011 Model car doesnt have air bags. And it did cost us approx $17K that time. Disadvantage of living in poor country with high taxes.
@@Adzmataz well in india thats still the case haha, many cars dont have rear seatbelts
Your consistency and quality of content never disappoints!
This bot is creepy and fast as fuc
ua-cam.com/video/c0iqixa74p8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Miniaturecarcollector228%EF%A3%BF
@NerdyyOG ua-cam.com/video/c0iqixa74p8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Miniaturecarcollector228%EF%A3%BF
Your mom never disappoints
You are a disappointment to the whole UA-cam community...
Super impressed that you got Elon to participate in one of your videos 👍
It was not real Elon
It was real
@@Jallu555 Sherlock
Looking a bit rough there :D 7:28 - RIP Skippy !
I didn't even know that a Tesla will pull the seatbelt in case of emergency braking. That's pretty awesome.
I would love to see "crash test dummy " Matt (pun intended) test more cars that have collision warning.
BATMAN agrees 👍
1. Radar is better at detecting moving objects. Would love a test with this to see if it makes a difference
2. Would be interesting to see the difference whilst the Tesla is on autopilot
3. Would love to see the test again when Using the vision system with the cars with no radar any more
You guys should actually test them until a certain speed whereby they actually crash into objects and those stop & go traffic whereby you accidentally release the brake pedal & whether the car will actually hit onto the object in front
11:43 okay interesting, that’s what enabled me to cancel the full emergency stop the Tesla randomly engaged on the highway for absolutely no reason 😂
Furry UwU also plays ETS 2 VERI NICE OWO
0:30 caught me laughing on the toilet 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💀
Along with questions like "what's the meaning of life?" and "when did time begin?"
Always answering the important ones 😂💪
A professional version of my janky tests 😂 🔌
Hey u have some of the most in-depth Tesla reviews on UA-cam u deserve ur flowers 🌺🔥🔥
Can't Wait Till you get FSD Beta in UK.
Miss your slither videos 👍😎
This is a great demonstration. We would all love to see more systems compared thoroughly put to the test. Thank you
“Hey guys today I’ve brought my cat whiskers. Today we’re gonna try and run him over!”
6:40 fake bounce
We need more and more Tesla's in Australia to save our roos.
...in the outback where there's no superchargers, so the Teslas will just be large paperweights. 😀 j/k
Hello Vinod Bhandari, I hope that you are correct. What's needed is for all vehicles to stop for the roos! It's time to educate vehicles make safety the number one job when in notion!!!
“Our Roos”, bro you’re Nepali.
Agreed
Very entertaining and thought provoking.
RIP Bezos, and kitty and doggo.
what about Skippy?
@@codeninja1823 yeah :c
Great video. Could you do the same test for other manufacturers?
well the cat's first life will go but the will still have 8 lives won't it?😁
Kangaroos are so loved in Australia they identify as humans!
This video was very informative, I’ve heard of this feature but have never seen it in action, Highly appreciated CarWow and much appreciated Matt.
My First thought at the first emergency braking was: "He just ruined his mother's safety score!" LOL. This video actually answered so many questions I've had. I really wanted to know if a Tesla would stop because I've seen videos of it stopping but I've also seen videos of it not stopping so I was wondering. Also, recently, I saw a video of a driver using his Tesla to ram another car to stop a kidnapping. I kept wondering why the Tesla wasn't stopping it. Your video answered that too! Kudos!
Fsd Beta and the Safety Score are not available in the Uk.
@@meriofrog Too bad about the FSD Beta. The Safety score is poorly implemented and can be very annoying too; You'll get dinged for things outside your control so it can be frustrating.
@@peterkn2 I mean what are the chances his mother is using Tesla insurance?
8:55 damm didn't saw that speed bump
imagine if your tesla stopped you in an empty way at the night , and on the screen it says there's a human In front of you. 🤣
When I drove my friends XC60 a dark night and a moose ran up on the road the car warned me and also stopped. A real life test, its good for me.
Mat and Yianni you both are my favourite car reviewers and drag racers ever
Check out Henry Catchpole on the Carfection youtube channel 🐐
Yianni is a MoT man
@@miketaylor1916 Yes
A Tesla won’t kill a cat,but Kurt Zouma might 🤣😭
10:20 - Mat's interview with Elon haha
This is the best car reviewing channel , THE HUMOUR 🤣🤣🤣😂👍👏👍👍
This was one of your more entertaining videos ever… so funny! Keep up the great work Matt!
It would be interesting to see videos like that with more cars and other brands🤔
Facts
EuroNCAP do this for many cars with videos afik
We should do cat test for all vehicle reviews from now own 😂👍
I was laughing so hard😂😂😂
Exactly, with real cats.
😎
8:28 come to think of it, wouldn't that dampen the sonars ability to detect the object?
It will only kill your cat if you didn't upgrade to the platinum version for an extra 500 dollars a month.
Rest in peace Skippy she was a cute and brave kangroo
Elon Musk - 4:08 time to buy carwow
10:35 Matt was right about Tesla shares coming down
3:30 As we're expected on a Volvo. Longer time reaction for the people on the back if the dont have any automated emergency brake system, because it's applying the brake as the tesla does but actually stopping much closer within the car in front. And keeping your body intact with the seat also prevent some worst injuries that may happen with the loose seatbelt. Good job Volvo!
I noticed the same. the Volvo is giving the car behind more time to react, which is better and safer
Yeah I guess, until you're in bad weather and that quicker stopping ends up being the difference between hitting something or not.
@@mediocreman2 Do you trust the vehicle on the back? I mean, bad weather equals longer reaction time. So the impact from the back would be greater if they do like the tesla does.
Just take a look at "teslawhambam" channel and there are so many tesla that having the backend broken bcz of slight-to-harder impact and it cost up to 20,000 dollar to fix.
The only cat the tesla would stop for is a Tiger 🐯 but that is definitely a time when your hopeing it won't stop on you! lol😂😂
Such a busy man don’t know how you managed to persuade him to come on your show, I’m impressed
Thank you for this. Both cars are great for safety. But with current turmoil and skyrocketing gas prices I'm going to buy a Tesla.
This really shows how much trust you can put in tecnical support from these so called bullet proof systems. You are responsible for your own driving.
More videos on the safety systems and in car options please. 👍
This feels like a top gear episode
i actually think this kind of crash prevention system should be standard for every single car around the world without any cost. So many accidents will be prevented.
Having owned most luxury brand cars (Mercedes, Volvo, BMW, Audi, and Tesla) they all automatically brake just fine for my stop and go traffic situations just fine. I know the Mercedes and Volvo have the tightening seatbelt system. The best system for highway is Tesla AutoPilot and Volvos Pilot Assist. The rest don’t work as well.
Volkswagen?
I own a Tesla Model Y 2022 and it has a LOT of ghost braking. The system on Mercedes is better. The decision to remove the radar on a 62000€car was stupid.
@@Lass_muc I own a 2022 Model Y Performance and no ghost braking.
@@chrisak49 I don't believe that.
@@Lass_muc I don't believe you even own a Tesla. Or any car.
Thank you so much for this insane video Mat
ua-cam.com/video/c0iqixa74p8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Miniaturecarcollector228%EF%A3%BF
I do have to say, my Model X did slam on the anchors for a cat, but it was legging it across the road at the time and not standing there waiting to die.
My parent's XC90 actually stopped at a dog that ran out of a driveway from around 40km/h, although that dog was a bit bigger than the stuffed animal in this vid
The reason the Volvo stops closer to the object is because that's how it's programmed - you're not meant to get used to letting the system activate, it's supposed to cut in at the very last moment for that specific reason to stop drivers abusing the system.
and to prevent people from hitting your rear, you can see that it doesn't apply full breaks right away.
In Sweden it is not recommended to brake for smaller animals because you can be hit from behind, and that is why it didn't stop for skippy. ( :
Loving these safety tests. Hope we get more!
pee
This makes me want to buy a volvo, anyone else feel the same?
Wait, are you an Aussie?
@@krnt13 nope, I'm from New Zealand 🇳🇿
@@YTPlayz331 I'm sorry, I was assuming you wanted to kill some Kangaroos...
@@krnt13 lol
@@krnt13 I was thinking the same thing like damn😂
9:15 if you're interested in the cat
Disclaimer: No cats were harmed in the making of this video.
1:44 Actually, that car would not have radar as all M3s after early 2021 would not have radar/LiDAR, and would be completely run on Tesla Vision through the cameras.
Hey Mat can you drag race a Bugatti Chiron Super Sport against a Rimac Nevera
7:57 whyyyyyyy
Dog dies
Love the content.
Are we sure this model 3 has radar however? They removed it and went to "Tesla Vision" in the 2021s
Not sure about ones built in/for Europe though
almost every manufacturer got these systems. It's genious and great for the peace of mind!
Makes the front recorder obsolete since you won't rear any other car and if someones hit you in the rear, it's their fault
i think size is key.. as imagine if a large bird flew past your front of your car .. it does an emergency stop and cause a serious accident. so i personally think its somewhat reassuring it doesnt emergency stop on small items such as birds or cats etc.
6:10 so your actually gonna come to our house...
I haven't had a laugh like this in a long time.
Thank you carwow and Matt!
Matt is very funny and smart guy i always inspire watch his videos 🙂💖🎉
ua-cam.com/video/c0iqixa74p8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Miniaturecarcollector228%EF%A3%BF
A good middle ground might be to brake for smaller animals, but to have a maximum amount of braking force; enough to give the animal a chance to run away (perhaps in unison with a very loud blast of frightening sound from the horn) but not full-on emergency braking. Even if you do still hit the animal, if you're driving at city/neighborhood speeds and the braking slows you some additional amount, the animal may live through the impact. And as an added precaution, disable the car from doing it at say, anything above 45mph or so, so that it doesn't risk doing so in a high-speed environment. And it also occurred to me that it might be nice if it was programmed to do the "frightening horn blast" only, for an animal that wasn't actuall in the road but was detected heading toward it or standing unsafely near the edge. I've seen situations where scaring a deer that's about to run into the road like that may save any following vehicles from hitting them.
i’m actually really curious to know if a Model 3 will allow you to hit a car or person in creep speeds like in a drive-thru. because i often have to creep forward very close to other cars to create room in the drive-thru and in traffic or even parking but i don’t want to be allowed to hit anything.
0:42 🤣🤣🤣
I had an interesting action from my old Audi A7 with auto braking. Driving along an empty country road and a torn open candy wrapper blew across in front of me, with the full open, metalized side toward me. The car hit the brakes, at least until it blew out of my path.
Another consideration; Is there an infrared component to these safety systems? A person or animal would have a heat signature where the stuffed animals do not. Add a heater to the stuffed animals to see if it sees them better.
Well to be honest a car should auto brake if it detects any objects in front of it.
1:13 So is it your Tesla mother 3?
Not Uluṟu in the background😂😂😂😂 7:39
Matt you are a legend at these videos...hilariously funny but extremely informative at the same time. Love to watch you!
3:21 volvo is actually safer. Braking hard doesnt mean safety. Its more dangerous because people behind will hit you. Braking with more distance can avoid that. And volvo brake gradually softened while tesla is just hard full stop.
Also making the braking hard and late makes you not rely on it for everyday driving/braking
One time I was waiting at a red light and after it turns green, just as I was about to go, a pedestrian walked in front of me. Yes he checked the light and still chose to cross. I was mad so I started driving anyway. I wanted to scare him. Unfortunately my Mercedes braked automatically and even as my foot was depressing the gas peddle significantly, yes on purpose, the car just won’t fking move! I wish at that point the system didn’t work.
Hello Jaijaun Hou, I feel your frustration at not being able to scare the krap out of him. It's nice that you didn't hit him. I had a slightly different situation. I was waiting at a light and it turned green to allow me to drive. I made a right turn (right turn signal on and flashing white waiting for t light to change). While making the turn a pedestrian walked (with the green light) but he walked into the back half of the work van I was driving. Since I started from a dead stop I was not traveling at anything more than a slow pace. His reaction after hitting the van was to hit it with his fist. I stopped and Sked if he is was hurt. His reply implied that I deliberately attempted to run him down/run him over. I pointed out to him where he contacted the vehicle. It didn't mollify him. After hearing an angry horn symphony (from blocking the street) I drove away as there wasn't anything else that could do. I'm still puzzled after so many years have passed how and why he contacted the van?
So if i want to steal your car al i have to do is stand in front of it and you can not get away?
5:20 Ralf Rangnick part time job in 6 months
Thank goodness seatbelts didn’t get invented in 2021 because people would still be debating if its safe
That was hilarious! 🤣🤣🤣🤣👌🏻 spot on!
Can confirm Volvo, and BMW AEB work well. 😂 Windows go up, seats go upright (in the BMW), seatbelts tighten front & rear, and the brakes slam on. 😂
Can confirm Ford's does not work. 😂
I can confirm with 100% confidence that Tesla's software is better than the trash software of BMWs , Audis etc ....
@@nirbhayatiwari5425 Oh yawn. We gotta do the "this is better than that" Jig? I'm sure one could confidently confirm the build quality of a BMW is better than Tesla..but we're not starting a shit fight.
@@asum307 I also don't want a fight ...
Every one is busy fighting with everyone ...
So let's be friends ...
Peace ...
The reason why both system doesnt stop for small animals is becasue that is intensional, sudden breaking for a small animal can cuase more harm to the driver as the car behind will need to break sudden aswell which will lead to a higher chance of more seriouse accident espcially at high speed. If you where on the high way going at 70mph and a fox jump out in front you wouldnt want your car to be breaking for it would you as the car behind will crash into you at these type of speed .
Exactly!
I'm pretty sure these braking systems don't turn on at 70mph in the first place so that would never happen. They would only turn on when driving around 30-37mph.
I am sure it is low speed collisions which usually occur in urban settings
I don't understand this line of reasoning. Why not create a set of rules for this. If there is no car behind then break. Maybe it could just be a certain distance. Next, if its a small object then only complete this maneuver if acceleration doesn't exceed a certain amount.
My S class (2021 model) used to do emergency braking in the middle of nowhere without anything coming the other way… it was so annoying I sold the car!
ua-cam.com/video/rDdkqzJzxww/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/c0iqixa74p8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Miniaturecarcollector228%EF%A3%BF
You made the correct choice
I bet you never even tried a camera recalibration lol
probably seeing ghosts
My dad's volvo make a alarm sound of a cat running over the street
Great video.
I would just add information to the dog situation. The dog's colour (deep black, not reflective), and not just the size, might be possibly the reason why it was hit even by the Tesla. It doesn't stand out from the background. Just remember that Tesla uses the white road markings to keep in the lane.
If you want to test this theory use a dog with another colour.
For example I tried this out on an automatic hand dryer by putting on matt black gloves. The dryer simply wouldn't start, because it's sensors can not pick up the trigger light, as no light reflects back from the material. Without the gloves the dryer worked completely fine.