"Can you deceive the world?" Of course he can, afterall he has been able to convince humanity that he is an actual human being and not just a super-advanced AI made to maintain a UA-cam channel
@@molotov6844 yes because I am not that familiar with plague Inc and I think I only got this recommended because of fake news. Thank you. Also just corroborating that the Philippines is suffering from a fake news epidemic courtesy of the presidential press having hired for a time a queen of fake news
@gapple * In most normal scenarios, Greenland is very VERY hard to infect. Even when you finally do get your virus over there it takes ages to spread to the entire populace. In this scenario, it was consumed almost instantly. So David is saying maybe the devs just did that to take the piss out of the game's usual programming.
I don't know if this only happens to me, but everytime i think "fuck it im starting in greenland" i always fucking lose because i couldn't infect everybody
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in this scenario what you want is to get a lot of early game plausibility, so when people hear about the fake news they are more inclined to believe it, rather than becoming informed, and then ramp up vitality so loads of people hear about, instead of trying to ramp up vitality and gain plausibility later.
@@vegitoblue8249 There IS a far right and denying it won't help anything. It's a small group of complete morons who just like commies cant learn from the past
This is really good, and I’m glad Plague made something like this. Just this scenario’s existence sort of spreads awareness of this issue. In my opinion, fake news is more of an issue than many even give it credit for.
Here's an interesting question: In a world where you can't know the truth, and you know that you can't know the truth, what is the purpuse of a news outlet? Followup question (though no doubt more contervertial, and harder answer): In such a world, what benefits does garanteeing free speech have?
It is an utopian goal to strive for. The question really is what you would be without people trying to uncover truth. I wouldn't be able to survive without it.
The purpose of a news outlet in a world of absolute uncertainty for a given topic is information that is culturally useful, or as a control mechanism set upon those who both do not accept the idea of unknowable truth for the given topic and trust the news to tell the truth that is knowable on that topic. in such a world, guaranteeing free speech on that topic has the benefit of liberty (not being fined or imprisoned, and being secure in your personal belongings) for those who hold any opinions on that topic, with the side affect of the news institutions having less control of the public perception of that topic, and therefore less excuse to manufacture a movement based on institutionalized opinion on that topic.
@@zachsoto7621 Such a cynical response. Why not start with the idea that many journalists try to do their job through a good deontologic code, whatever the wet dreams of those in power (or those who want that power) of controlling the narrative? If you look at reality: it is not that the alternative of dog eat dog trolling and pushing whatever hoax or gaslighting whichever opponent wherever, is any more perfect or would bring us any more truth.
@@maremaarten If truth cannot be known, as per the hypothetical, why is a deontologic code good, beyond just internal consistency? Does an ethical journalistic job exist when the news outlet does not itself value, or even disdains ethics? Why?
@@zachsoto7621 That code is like the scientific method: you subject something to tests and then you accept it temporarily, until proven otherwise. Still a whole lot better than just 'anything goes'. Concerning your second point, stating that the news outlets don't value ethics, that's mere conjecture, your own bias. Even if some news outlets don't value ethics, there are still many journalists who do, who work within those outlets, and also, you can investigate their sources and their names and such, I cannot investigate you and what you defend (for instance). Why would I distrust media outlets whose job it is to seek and uncover an utopian point of truth, based on the echo chamber of random people on the internet whose identity, background, ideology and political agenda I don't even know and am unable to disclose?
Considering how complex this topic is, I think that they did a pretty good job. Sadly, people (and I'm not immune) can be easily made to believe crazy and dangerous things.
Doesn’t have to it can warp which is all that is needed though a building wouldn’t pancake like it did in videos of the incident. Though those vids could be fake... eh we’re boned
I am have a actual degree in Welding Engineering Technology, which means I am an actual expert in this subject. The World Trade Center collapse was not faked, it was taken down by terrorists. When heated to high enough temperatures steel will become soft and malleable before it melts. This is called the forging temperature of the metal as in the temperature range blacksmiths use to shape and work with metal. The steel beams don't need to melt they just need to become soft enough to give way on one of the floors. Then when those steel beams give way you have a situation where otherwise uncompromised steel beams are now overloaded and fail and the floors below the fire fail because instead of being under a normal semi-static load they are suddenly under the impact load of an entire building falling on them. Think of placing a 5 lbs weight on a glass table vs dropping the 5 lbs weight on a glass table. Never forget the burning temperature of wood and many other substances that would have been present in the building is much hotter than the burning temperature of jet fuel. Ancient civilizations fueled forges with wood or coal, they were not doing it with jet fuel.
Jackson Davis ok the fact that steel losses strength before reaching melting point I am well aware of. What I am also aware of is fire is not equal, controlled or targeted. This means the expected structural failure would be un even and the building topples not fall on its own foundations. That is a result hoped for during a demolition not a aircraft crashing into one side of a building. Like chopping a tree remove material from one side it will likely fall on that side. Removing material in this case heating the support columns. No disrespect just like a good debate have a good day.
@@AceDan-gc9po Two problems with that theory, the heating was caused at the upper layers of the building, when the supports failed, the building started to fall downwards, second, unlike a tree, a building has a lot of hollow space inside of it, that allows materials to fall inwards, not just outwards. Secondly, conversation of energy is a bit of a bitch, so when the upper levels supports gave out, and fell downwards, a bunch of ectra energy was added upon the supports below it at roughly or nearly roughly the same time, allowing the building to more or less crumple, instead of folding. Next perform an experiment for me, take a can, carefully add weight onto the can till the can gives out.....Take another can, take a pen, quickly poke a dent or hold int the can, then repeat the experiment, you will notice something. Second experiment, take a steel bar, hit something with it, see how much damage you do to the steel bar....Take that same steel bar, and heat it 650 degrees C, hit something with that same steel bar, and see how much damage you do to that steel bar....Repeat the experiment as many times as you want.
This is scarier than the actual plague Inc game itself in my opinion. I'd rather die of a horrible disease than live in a society full of lies and mistrust to the point I am forced into my home.
There was a woman who killed her kids and herself because she thought all republicans would be lined up against a wall. Alex Jones told people they were better off killing themselves than living after Biden's inauguration. Definitely a real thing.
Imagine if kittens could actually start fake news. Like, a cat just makes its own UA-cam video or something and starts talking about, well, pretty much anything. Would the people of the world just swap places with cats?
@@tentilol factually incorrect. the developers behind the game was paid cash to make this scenario. they have every incentive to port the scenario, but they didn't. it's obviously to oblige to the google libtard hiveminds, since these sheeps are incapable of critical thinking. by restricting their intelligence & consumption of content to the likes of reddit & twitter, the masses can be easily swayed on the miracles of """Science""". in reality, fake historical events are taught in schools & universities, such as the Holocaust & the Space Race of the Cold War. Wake up & free yourself, because we don't need to pretend anymore. btw, you better be deceived otherwise i have to restart my playthrough 😝
Not sure if this is 100% correct but oh well. You can play custon scenarios on mobile (Android and IOS) but you have to pay. Its kinda expensive. Its not even that good.
I don't think we should *have* official fact checkers. People should not be in charge of determining fact in matters which are or can be easily construed as a matter of opinion or technicality.
I agree. I think the problem with fact checkers is they tend to try to sum everything up in a simple answer when the actual facts are far more complicated. And often, they actually distract from the question itself or get hung up on a single word in the question. For example: Opinion 1: Islam is peace. Opinion 2: Islam is violent. Fact checker: According to polls, an overwhelming majority of Muslims say they want peace. Facts: Read the Quran, learn about Mohammed's career as a "prophet", observe the behaviour of your local Muslim neighbors but also the general state of things in predomionantly Muslim countries, and you will find your own facts.
One thing ive found to work is just focus entirely on plausability as much as you can before going for virality. Tons of virality but little plausability means a lot of people will be getting tricked sure, but a fuckton more will get informed. If you focus on plausability however, before long your tricked people will start to outnumber the informed, and this only gets better as you focus harder on your plausability
The thing that the main mode needs is a recovered percentage. There isn't a plauge that has a 100% fatality rate. Even the bubonic plauge had 10 people out of every 1000 survive
So many new mechanics added to the game engine...none of which are available in the scenario creator. It's a shame, that allied-neutral-enemy dynamic looks like it would be a lot of fun to play with :(
I'm glad this was created. I look at stuff many would try to cover up and this scenario is extremely realistic. and to anyone reading. your side isn't safe from it. no ones "group" or "movement" is safe from it. You must stay organized, cohesive. Never say "This group was/is a victim so they must be innocent." always think of not only the morality of a solution, but how realistic a solution would be. take this from someone who lives in a country where our law enforcement actively covers up our "leaders" wrong doings. our country uses those often referred to as victims as tools, or keeps their victim status to protect their wrongdoings.
I love how he said he was going to pick something non controversial before making his choices LMAO. I thought he was going to come up with something totally unbelievable and stupid instead of something tons of people already believe (and who would probably get butthurt by watching).
"Can you deceive the world?" Of course he can, afterall he has been able to convince humanity that he is an actual human being and not just a super-advanced AI made to maintain a UA-cam channel
shut up you Fake-Gate, I'm fact checking
i KNEW it
i'm telling my mum
Honestly, I doubt even Alex Jones would care about the rise of AI if they just became internet personas.
@@StarboyXL9 is this a nazi joke?
@@ancapftw9113 is this simulacra joke?
Should of named the fake news "hot singles in your area"
Or anti vaccination
Or essentials oil can cure cancer
bruh that would be so dank but ya know, the character limit
ur profile pic lol
Nahhh
He rather had to call it Nazi Propaganda
LMAO THE LAWYERS ARE MOSQUITOS
And the politicians are zombies ... they definitely are brainless
Just like in bee movie
ya like dead memes
I see nothing strange about this.
Seems noemal
@@smeckledeckle6573 Yes, that is the point. Mosquitos suck your blood. Lawyers suck your money.
7:45
"can't devolve memes"
Yep.
they devolve automatically after like 3 days
They do it themselves
You can make a template out of this
So realistic.
The four countries of the apocalypse:
Cuba,
Philippines,
Madagascar,
And their ultimate leader...
Greenland
What about Caribbean?
@@monke4349 Cuba
Philippines isn't too inaccurate. Look to president murder for fake news
@@paulsd9255 do I have to directly point out to you that these are all the places which are islands with no airfield and just a port?
@@molotov6844 yes because I am not that familiar with plague Inc and I think I only got this recommended because of fake news. Thank you.
Also just corroborating that the Philippines is suffering from a fake news epidemic courtesy of the presidential press having hired for a time a queen of fake news
*watches how fast Greenland is taken*
Me : "impossible"
Petrenko Wallace I’m pretty sure they did that on purpose. Kills me every time XD
@gapple * In most normal scenarios, Greenland is very VERY hard to infect. Even when you finally do get your virus over there it takes ages to spread to the entire populace. In this scenario, it was consumed almost instantly. So David is saying maybe the devs just did that to take the piss out of the game's usual programming.
Warhammered and does Greenland even use internet
0-500 kp/h in 4 seconds
@@Indoor_Carrot Actually in the board game scenario it was actually easy to get into Greenland
This means that you can name the disease "Birds=Fake" which is actually kinda funny
wake up california
Or Australia - fake
More like:
Bielefeld = not existent
😂😂😂
@@stonkay7801 and start it in australia
r/birdsarentreal?
Everyone:- Greenland is the hardest to infect.
Me:- starts disease in greenland
@Totally not the flash :3 fuck madasgascar man! i was feeling victorious and realized tiny madagascar was healty and lost :'D
I don't know if this only happens to me, but everytime i think "fuck it im starting in greenland" i always fucking lose because i couldn't infect everybody
Yeah you fucked up at other remote lands
but then greenland shuts down their seaport and you're screwed
That’s what I call a pro gamer move
love how "trolling" has the fat guy icon and "politicians" has the zombie icon
And lawyers have the Mosquito, as someone pointed out. Which to be honest, is funny af
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in this scenario what you want is to get a lot of early game plausibility, so when people hear about the fake news they are more inclined to believe it, rather than becoming informed, and then ramp up vitality so loads of people hear about, instead of trying to ramp up vitality and gain plausibility later.
Lol fact checkers sometimes spread fake news themselves.
Niall Ireland at 2030 is now a professional fake news spreader
@@principleshipcoleoid8095 Which is btw also a thing in this scenario.
"People will believe in a big lie if it's frequent enough".
You sound like a fucking tryhard
Weve been tricked, weve been backstabbed, weve been quite possibly, Bamboozled
what's the reference?
@@kaibean8046 red vs blue, it used to be on netflix but now I think it's only on Rooster Teeths app
@@alaskaball188 That from the season where they're on chorus in the middle of the box canyon?
@@kaibean8046 idk it's been a few years sense iv seen it but I know it's either the first or second season
It was season 12
I love how ambiguous this scenario is, every side will think Plague Inc. is with them
Or against them if you pick the witch hunt upgrade
@@Ganondorf98 Know thy enemy. Don't you know the other side says the same? That the far right does this. I mean, I'm sure you'd know that
Doom Maker there basically isn't a far right
@@vegitoblue8249 There IS a far right and denying it won't help anything. It's a small group of complete morons who just like commies cant learn from the past
Doom Maker yeah but they are 1% of the population, the far left close to 5%
For anyone who didn't know, community stops deceived people from being informed
We laugh now, but this is so true and is horifing.
It’s even more true now that coronavirus is here
@@thedancingmoonfoxy7272?
@@thedancingmoonfoxy7272 idk
Its more worst during the election i dont even know whats real
well well well
it's actually scary how accurate much of this scenario is...
Tbh he looks so happy talking about psychology and fallacies and fake news spreading logistic
I'm happy for him
Where Profile pic?
I beat this in Casual, Normal and Brutal but i couldn't beat in Mega Brutal and this will help me a lot, apreciate Pravus :)
Diogo Benvinda
HOW
@@chaymrow1542 how what ? xD
Diogo Benvinda how did you beat it in normal, casual, and brutal.. teach me pls :)
Kkk
@@chaymrow1542sorry for the BIG delay xD, is the same as pravus beat on mega brutal but is more easier
This is really good, and I’m glad Plague made something like this. Just this scenario’s existence sort of spreads awareness of this issue. In my opinion, fake news is more of an issue than many even give it credit for.
🤦♀
@@Isaacenduro what
Wow. Irony.
Here's an interesting question:
In a world where you can't know the truth, and you know that you can't know the truth, what is the purpuse of a news outlet?
Followup question (though no doubt more contervertial, and harder answer):
In such a world, what benefits does garanteeing free speech have?
It is an utopian goal to strive for. The question really is what you would be without people trying to uncover truth. I wouldn't be able to survive without it.
The purpose of a news outlet in a world of absolute uncertainty for a given topic is information that is culturally useful, or as a control mechanism set upon those who both do not accept the idea of unknowable truth for the given topic and trust the news to tell the truth that is knowable on that topic.
in such a world, guaranteeing free speech on that topic has the benefit of liberty (not being fined or imprisoned, and being secure in your personal belongings) for those who hold any opinions on that topic, with the side affect of the news institutions having less control of the public perception of that topic, and therefore less excuse to manufacture a movement based on institutionalized opinion on that topic.
@@zachsoto7621 Such a cynical response. Why not start with the idea that many journalists try to do their job through a good deontologic code, whatever the wet dreams of those in power (or those who want that power) of controlling the narrative? If you look at reality: it is not that the alternative of dog eat dog trolling and pushing whatever hoax or gaslighting whichever opponent wherever, is any more perfect or would bring us any more truth.
@@maremaarten If truth cannot be known, as per the hypothetical, why is a deontologic code good, beyond just internal consistency? Does an ethical journalistic job exist when the news outlet does not itself value, or even disdains ethics? Why?
@@zachsoto7621 That code is like the scientific method: you subject something to tests and then you accept it temporarily, until proven otherwise. Still a whole lot better than just 'anything goes'. Concerning your second point, stating that the news outlets don't value ethics, that's mere conjecture, your own bias. Even if some news outlets don't value ethics, there are still many journalists who do, who work within those outlets, and also, you can investigate their sources and their names and such, I cannot investigate you and what you defend (for instance). Why would I distrust media outlets whose job it is to seek and uncover an utopian point of truth, based on the echo chamber of random people on the internet whose identity, background, ideology and political agenda I don't even know and am unable to disclose?
"I'm going to pick something uncontroversial"
Goes with the second most controversial topic in the entire list
Considering how complex this topic is, I think that they did a pretty good job. Sadly, people (and I'm not immune) can be easily made to believe crazy and dangerous things.
4:44
Blaming- Women :"A member of the species Homo sapiens"
Blaming- Men :"A member of the species Homo sapiens"
Am I the only one who noticed this?
“They should blame the communists!”
Me: *mumbles in mixed German-Russian*
Theres gonna be an unwanted war of politics in the Comment section.
LONG LIVE BIG CHIN!
Kevinglas, you forgot the "A"
😉
@@Grassie_D9938 Gringos cant understand anyway
David Gomez
gradeaundera?
@@kevinolmedo675 First sorry and TypicalThunderz maybe
Yes this is exactly what happened with the media saying video games cause violence
This makes me happy I work for an objective news company. Nothing goes unnoticed on my watch
“except community doesn’t kill people”
**hovers mouse over it**
*how lethal your pathogen is*
13:43 Holy crap I haven’t seen Greenland get infected so fast.
words are more effective than infections
If they create Twitter mode as a cure mode, it will be impossible
"that princess, i like to give her a big smooch"
"mr president, the mic is on"
"..." "fake news"
Don't worry guys...
jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
well, whether it can or not...
building 7 didn't collapse by it's self
Doesn’t have to it can warp which is all that is needed though a building wouldn’t pancake like it did in videos of the incident. Though those vids could be fake... eh we’re boned
I am have a actual degree in Welding Engineering Technology, which means I am an actual expert in this subject.
The World Trade Center collapse was not faked, it was taken down by terrorists.
When heated to high enough temperatures steel will become soft and malleable before it melts. This is called the forging temperature of the metal as in the temperature range blacksmiths use to shape and work with metal. The steel beams don't need to melt they just need to become soft enough to give way on one of the floors. Then when those steel beams give way you have a situation where otherwise uncompromised steel beams are now overloaded and fail and the floors below the fire fail because instead of being under a normal semi-static load they are suddenly under the impact load of an entire building falling on them. Think of placing a 5 lbs weight on a glass table vs dropping the 5 lbs weight on a glass table.
Never forget the burning temperature of wood and many other substances that would have been present in the building is much hotter than the burning temperature of jet fuel. Ancient civilizations fueled forges with wood or coal, they were not doing it with jet fuel.
Jackson Davis ok the fact that steel losses strength before reaching melting point I am well aware of. What I am also aware of is fire is not equal, controlled or targeted. This means the expected structural failure would be un even and the building topples not fall on its own foundations. That is a result hoped for during a demolition not a aircraft crashing into one side of a building. Like chopping a tree remove material from one side it will likely fall on that side. Removing material in this case heating the support columns. No disrespect just like a good debate have a good day.
@@AceDan-gc9po Two problems with that theory, the heating was caused at the upper layers of the building, when the supports failed, the building started to fall downwards, second, unlike a tree, a building has a lot of hollow space inside of it, that allows materials to fall inwards, not just outwards. Secondly, conversation of energy is a bit of a bitch, so when the upper levels supports gave out, and fell downwards, a bunch of ectra energy was added upon the supports below it at roughly or nearly roughly the same time, allowing the building to more or less crumple, instead of folding.
Next perform an experiment for me, take a can, carefully add weight onto the can till the can gives out.....Take another can, take a pen, quickly poke a dent or hold int the can, then repeat the experiment, you will notice something. Second experiment, take a steel bar, hit something with it, see how much damage you do to the steel bar....Take that same steel bar, and heat it 650 degrees C, hit something with that same steel bar, and see how much damage you do to that steel bar....Repeat the experiment as many times as you want.
This is scarier than the actual plague Inc game itself in my opinion. I'd rather die of a horrible disease than live in a society full of lies and mistrust to the point I am forced into my home.
13:44 Greenland exploded again...
*Because of-* who did I blame- *The communists*
7:43 “Can’t devolve memes” The internet in a nutshell
2019: normal video game
2020: this game didn't age well.
oh man that's a really cool scenario and also abit scarily true how easy misinformation can go viral, overshadowing the truth
This is terrifyingly resemblant of reality.
Okay this is actually amazing.
Praise Pravus!
"Created with the help of professional fact checking organizations"
Oh no
3:55 is it even fake news at this point? :P
Oh no, you have been deceived! /s
"Except you know people don't die from this"
Antivaxer's child left the chat
There was a woman who killed her kids and herself because she thought all republicans would be lined up against a wall. Alex Jones told people they were better off killing themselves than living after Biden's inauguration. Definitely a real thing.
@@appalachiabrauchfrau what the fuck. . . do what I am planning on Moving out of country if it goes to shit
16:53 This could not have hit any closer to reality.
this scenario is sad and true at the same time, it is suprising that fake news can spread like a disease
Imagine if kittens could actually start fake news. Like, a cat just makes its own UA-cam video or something and starts talking about, well, pretty much anything. Would the people of the world just swap places with cats?
Idk why this scenario is not on the android version of Plague Inc..
And who works for the illuminati ? The Elites ! This is a conspiracy !!!
Because it's hard to code
@@tentilol
factually incorrect. the developers behind the game was paid cash to make this scenario. they have every incentive to port the scenario, but they didn't.
it's obviously to oblige to the google libtard hiveminds, since these sheeps are incapable of critical thinking. by restricting their intelligence & consumption of content to the likes of reddit & twitter, the masses can be easily swayed on the miracles of """Science""". in reality, fake historical events are taught in schools & universities, such as the Holocaust & the Space Race of the Cold War. Wake up & free yourself, because we don't need to pretend anymore.
btw, you better be deceived otherwise i have to restart my playthrough 😝
Basically BuzzFeed in its entirety
Love how this Got posted 9 days before 2020
2020 and we STILL can't instal custom scenarios on the Android version.
We can i played it :D but its was a mod version
Not sure if this is 100% correct but oh well.
You can play custon scenarios on mobile (Android and IOS) but you have to pay. Its kinda expensive. Its not even that good.
And here I am, having to look up guides for *normal* mode of this
Love how once the blame shifted there was a bigass ideological shift, this really feels like Fake News lol
How many funds do you have?
*5*
Take it or leave it
Decived people will over time turn into Informed people. Community slows that down.
I don't think we should *have* official fact checkers. People should not be in charge of determining fact in matters which are or can be easily construed as a matter of opinion or technicality.
No such thing as an official fact checkef
I agree. I think the problem with fact checkers is they tend to try to sum everything up in a simple answer when the actual facts are far more complicated. And often, they actually distract from the question itself or get hung up on a single word in the question.
For example:
Opinion 1: Islam is peace.
Opinion 2: Islam is violent.
Fact checker: According to polls, an overwhelming majority of Muslims say they want peace.
Facts: Read the Quran, learn about Mohammed's career as a "prophet", observe the behaviour of your local Muslim neighbors but also the general state of things in predomionantly Muslim countries, and you will find your own facts.
Based and repilled
@@colonelburton8451 Fact: 100% of Muslims are not violent. Opinion 2 is false. Special thanks to snopes.
@@Root4BeerFloats i hope youre joking
13:42 is what every plague inc player wants For their Greenland
0:40 irrelevant but I put my phone down on the edge of my bed to fix my headphones and it fell and I jumped soo badly XD
I find it funny that the politicians are represented with the zombie icon
Also students represented as corpses
This was uploaded a year ago? Who over at plague inc knew this would happen
This one was pretty hilarious! Thank you Pravus!
13:43
Jesus look at Greenland XD
More like redland ;)
I’m sorry, that wasn’t funny, I’ll stop
The communists are taking their jobs so it's red
Sorry
Be on your best behaviour, comrade.
Fun fact: this day half of people are informed and half deceived
I respect the amount of work that was put into this scenario
I literally bought and downloaded this game because of you, lmao.
The most reallistic scenario if you think about it, and that has happened a "couple" times before.
I knew there is going to be memes option in this scenario, I just knew it
Guy: We warned you, don't be political at the meet up.
Me 6 minutes during the meeting: 3:29
last time I was this early, a superbacteria just spawned into the world ready to kill all of humanity
One thing ive found to work is just focus entirely on plausability as much as you can before going for virality. Tons of virality but little plausability means a lot of people will be getting tricked sure, but a fuckton more will get informed. If you focus on plausability however, before long your tricked people will start to outnumber the informed, and this only gets better as you focus harder on your plausability
Followed this guide and finally beat this scenario on Mega Brutal. Even got a score of 83947. Thank you.
The thing that the main mode needs is a recovered percentage. There isn't a plauge that has a 100% fatality rate. Even the bubonic plauge had 10 people out of every 1000 survive
'Impersonate fact checkers'
Boris Johnson: WRITE THAT DOWN, WRITE THAT DOWN!
Then you have Corbyn who lies for their following.
Country: exists
Communist immigrants: *smacks lips seductively*
When you name your plague in fake gate “fortnite is awesome”...
*lost in 4 days*
pov: you're playing cure mode bioweapon mega brutal and censorship just ended
So many new mechanics added to the game engine...none of which are available in the scenario creator. It's a shame, that allied-neutral-enemy dynamic looks like it would be a lot of fun to play with :(
Damn, this scenario is almost prophetic
Imagine Pewdiepie is in Plague inc like he control memes. Lol
I always have Fake News started by kittens out of boredom :)
You had one chance to play as a cat, blaming women just to see the world burns. You missed it.
“social media banned in usa” 💀
who else is here from 2020 and are just thinking about the irony
13:43 the way greenland just went from regular to completely deceived in 5 seconds in HALARIOUS 🤣🤣🤣🤣
"U.S taking measures to fight misinformation."
I wish that were true. I wish...
Vox is shaking in their chairs right now
I love that at 3:54, politicians are represented by the zombie symbol :)
Wow thats a lot of damage
Imagine if he also named it "liberal media"
"Spread misinformation that I am in fact, a deity"
I'm glad this was created. I look at stuff many would try to cover up and this scenario is extremely realistic. and to anyone reading. your side isn't safe from it. no ones "group" or "movement" is safe from it. You must stay organized, cohesive.
Never say "This group was/is a victim so they must be innocent."
always think of not only the morality of a solution, but how realistic a solution would be.
take this from someone who lives in a country where our law enforcement actively covers up our "leaders" wrong doings. our country uses those often referred to as victims as tools, or keeps their victim status to protect their wrongdoings.
13:43 Did... you just *deceive* Greenland!? 😱😱😱
Should have called it “Reddit”
Try this custom scenario NaNo BoTs, by me!
You should have had your plausibility higher than virality to start
did this and my disease was called buzzfeed
13:43 Greenland has left the chat
13:42 I wish greenland fell like that in every single playthrough
The true end of the world scenario in the future.
This is super relatable in 2020. Genius
I love how he said he was going to pick something non controversial before making his choices LMAO. I thought he was going to come up with something totally unbelievable and stupid instead of something tons of people already believe (and who would probably get butthurt by watching).
"COMMUNIST"
meanwhile: SOVIET IS BACK!!!!
*starts singing soviet anthem*
what
Oh yeah it's all coming together
-Lenin in his grave
I see, so its a culture war simulation. Very nice.
"This is my message:
Deceive the world!
Change the future...
Save her...
El
Psy
Kongroo"