Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism | World History | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 573

  • @boonpaul8749
    @boonpaul8749 7 років тому +353

    In Theravada Buddhism, they tried to preserve the original of the Buddha's way of practicing and wanted to do the same thing like Buddha(Tathāgata or Gautama Buddha)

    • @edwinagustian4769
      @edwinagustian4769 4 роки тому +11

      Very true

    • @peacebe2u480
      @peacebe2u480 4 роки тому +6

      Boon, n edwin agustian:
      The best way to describe is... crossing the rapid river of suffering.. u can use kayaking alone to reach the other shore. Or you can get in a huge boat with many seekers, captain (buddha) of the boat n stewards (sangha members) to serve your seeking... n the compass (dhamma) that will help you to navigate thru the treacherous waters to reach the other shore.
      Which is your own preference.. just do it.

    • @peacebe2u480
      @peacebe2u480 4 роки тому +1

      @@edwinagustian4769
      Read my comment next

    • @realtalk6195
      @realtalk6195 3 роки тому +7

      Not exactly. Gautam Buddha didn't eat meat, whereas almost all Theravada monks eat meat. Many Mahayana and Vijrayana monks also eat meat. Only portions of Mahayana don't eat meat. Overall most Buddhists do. Furthermore, even among the Theravada most are polytheistic and include deities.

    • @kulosure9716
      @kulosure9716 3 роки тому +22

      @@realtalk6195 no Gautama eat meat ,

  • @inclusiveoutsider6854
    @inclusiveoutsider6854 7 років тому +256

    I was raised as a Theravada Buddhist and this video was fairly accurate, however, the definition of a Bodhisattva isn't totally accurate according to the Theravada tradition. A Bodhisattva is the term used to describe a being who will become a Buddha in a following life, more specifically it is used to describe Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha) in his previous lives. Also, it is true that an Arhat (Arahanth) is a being that attains nirvana (enlightenment and ends their cycle of suffering and rebirth upon their death) and a Buddha is an Arhat/Arahanth, because they also end their cycle as well upon death. The difference is that the Buddha teaches and helps others to get on the path to Nirvana. Basically the definition you used for a Bodhisattva is the definition we use for a Buddha and a Bodhisattva is this person in his previous live.

    • @Jessica-bo3kd
      @Jessica-bo3kd 4 роки тому +7

      Also a Bodhisatta isn't enlightened.

    • @peacebe2u480
      @peacebe2u480 3 роки тому +8

      @@Jessica-bo3kd , @Inclusive Outsider
      Boddhisattva must go through 10 stages of Boddhisattvahood. The tenth level if completed successfully, reach the Supreme Enlightenment. Enlightenment has many levels. *SUPREME* Enlightenment is the only one. Logics.
      Boddhisattva that reaches the tenth stage level postphoning of becoming Buddha, and come back to teach the agnostic (lacking knowledge) people like you n you n you.... in our samsaric circle of life. There are beings that prefer to forsake their Buddhahood for a time, and remain as Bosdhisattva in order to persuade, to teach, to expound the Buddha's teaching through 84,000 skillful means.
      In Mahayana discipline or sect, majority of Buddhists take *Boddhisattva Oath* as part of their commitment. They prefer to cross through the river of samsara with more beings together to reach the other shore instead of being alone on the other side.
      Hinayana = the small vehicle to reach the other shore of the samsara river, can be refer as solo Kayaking.
      Mahayana = the Larger or Great or Huge vehicle can be referred as a Cruise Ship that can carry thousands of the same minded seekers to reach the other shore together.
      The Captain = the Abbot, the Crews = Sangha Community, the Compass = Dharma and the passengers = the seekers...
      As to which you prefer, it is up to your personality type. A loner seeker or a groupie type of seeker... does not matter. You get the idea.

    • @kaungkhantkyaw4410
      @kaungkhantkyaw4410 3 роки тому +1

      @@peacebe2u480 I am Nepali so I learned Pali easily(also because I used to lived in Myanmar). And man your explain is pretty complex.

    • @Tank1
      @Tank1 3 роки тому +1

      ya i was just stating this myself before i saw the comment but i speak of it from a spiritual way of being there.. to put it shortly and bluntly simple beneath it all, Thai Theravada buddism seems less advanced and more for people that are beginners like people that will not reach nirvana and will reincarnate..
      while the ones that understand Bodhisattva are for people that understood the spiritual..
      to me its like theravada is the story of buddha, the journey.. and Bodhisattva is buddhas knowledge after he found enlightenment... so it makes sense Bodhisattva is the more adavance higher form. all the thai moneks ive met and encountered are not and dont feel of high spiritual growth.. i feel they are even far below me in knowledge.

    • @arien_000
      @arien_000 3 роки тому +13

      @@Tank1oh wow. U must be someone of high spiritual attainment to be able to judge Thai Bhuddists.

  • @Ginnaliye
    @Ginnaliye 7 років тому +200

    In Theravada Buddhism "bodhisathwa" is a person who develop some skills (like generosity ) necessary to be a Buddha. It's a difficult practice that most people easily would give up. If someone wants to end the Samsaric journey (going life after life which has no end otherwise) they can still do it without becoming a Buddha. Anyone can attain The Nirvana or the enlightenment by following the way found by the Buddha. They are called an "Arahanth".

    • @inclusiveoutsider6854
      @inclusiveoutsider6854 7 років тому +8

      Wow I just typed a comment stating this exact thing that a Bodhisattva is the term to describe a being who will become a Buddha in a future life. The way you wrote Arhat is also the way we pronounce it as well as Arahanth according to the Theravada tradition.

    • @krishuang6309
      @krishuang6309 6 років тому +9

      In Pali: Arahant, Bodhisatta, and Nibbana; in Sanskrit: Arhat, Bodhisattva, Nirvana. What you've described about Bodhisatta in Theravada Buddhism is in general correct. It's a status becoming a future Buddha, and it has to be granted and recognized by a previous living Buddha. There are several other conditions as well. Also it generally takes eons before becoming a future Buddha and start to teach. So it's usually encouraged in Theravada Buddhism to attain Nibbana and become an Arahant, which is much, much easier.

    • @thanujakj1971
      @thanujakj1971 5 років тому

      0

    • @kashyap5849
      @kashyap5849 4 роки тому +8

      Mahayanists trying to become a Bodhisatta is ridiculous. What will world do with so many Bodhisattas? A bodhisatta must have been prophesized and blessed by a buddha for being a future buddha. And a Buddha blesses and prophesies only one bodhisatta because it's extremely difficult and any normal person would give it up. So millions of Mahayanist trying to become bodhisatta is pointless :)... It's even better to live a meditative and disciplined life rather than worshiping any deities and imaginary Buddha. A true bodhisatta would never practice any type of ignorances like those practices. Practising Theravada doesn't mean you're gonna seek for Nirvana in shorter time or just arhantship, rather it's also a place for those who really deserve trying to achieve buddhahood with original Buddhas teachings while its still available, not defending on any imaginary misconceptions but realities those Buddha stated by himself, under shades of arhats(I'm saying it as only the side of theravadists has arhats). Just vowing for salvation of all beings doesn't make any sense for buddhahood to me.... It's not possible even for a Buddha to save all beings from suffering, but it's possible to save a lots, millions of beings with bodhisatta himself... So taking vow to save all beings is a type of great ignorance in fact it'll be a factor to struck into cycle or limitless rebirths for a impossible effort to save all the beings at once. Mahayanists, don't make this misleading vow and practices.

    • @kashyap5849
      @kashyap5849 4 роки тому

      @@keshnipunchihewa312 yeah right

  • @chrism7275
    @chrism7275 7 років тому +121

    Thanks for the video, I kicked drugs after 7 years from a teacher who taught bhuddism he did a lot to wake me up to life and he never made me feel like I was to give blind trust cus everything he said seemed like forgotten common sense

    • @burnerdaughter
      @burnerdaughter 3 роки тому +6

      I love your phrasing--"forgotten common sense"

  • @mi-vv4yv
    @mi-vv4yv 7 років тому +81

    this is literally what I am studying right now. great timing

  • @ivormectin9889
    @ivormectin9889 4 роки тому +94

    The Buddha did not teach ‘Theravada’ or ‘Mahayana’, he taught the Dharma.

    • @anurangaliyanage4202
      @anurangaliyanage4202 4 роки тому +12

      that is totally truth !!! namo buddhaya!!!

    • @truthseeker7759
      @truthseeker7759 3 роки тому +1

      YES!

    • @ivormectin9889
      @ivormectin9889 3 роки тому +6

      @ Dhamma in Pali, Dharma in Sanskrit. I was taught in the Mahayana school which is mainly Sanskrit based.

    • @ivormectin9889
      @ivormectin9889 3 роки тому

      @ All is one my friend, (as was my original point) best wishes on your journey.

    • @kaustubhnigam628
      @kaustubhnigam628 3 роки тому +3

      @ what *original* ??
      Do you think he taught in Pali ?? ........he taught in ardhamagadhi language not in Sanskrit or Pali
      Later it was his disciples who started teaching his dharma in their own language which included Pali , Sanskrit , Prakrit , and other indian languages prominent at that time

  • @floptaxie68
    @floptaxie68 Рік тому +14

    I’m a Westener Buddhist🥰
    I’m more in Therevada(simplicity and into the Pali Canon, but open to other ideas of Mahayanan monks) but I like the figure of the Boddhisatvas(because of what they represent) and some techniques of meditation developed by other schools, like mantras in Tibetan and Zen meditation.

  • @mnsamarasinghe
    @mnsamarasinghe 3 роки тому +8

    In theravada there are 3 ways to acheive nirvana. Become a Buddha, become a 'Pase Buddha' and become a Arahath. If someone become a Buddha he has the ability to (know how to) teach others to acheive nirvana(if they have will), but to become other 2 mean, they don't have ability to do so.

    • @vijjanandadhamma
      @vijjanandadhamma 3 роки тому +1

      Arahat can also teach the way to enlightment. Only pacheka Buddha are not able to teach the way to ENLIGHTMENT.
      BUDDHAM SARANAM GACCHAMI

    • @vijjanandadhamma
      @vijjanandadhamma 3 роки тому

      Guys do you know why the BUDDHA after attainment stay back to teach?
      Do you think the buddha staying back is to tell you to become a BUDDHA will be better?
      Guy in the dhamma, wake up be wise.
      If the BUDDHA staying back is about getting everyone to vow to become Bodhisattva, it would have been thought initially by the BUDDHA himself. But this never happen because the BUDDHA know it is not the correct ways to teach and wrong way to encourage Bodhisattva vow.
      So wake up Bodhisattva friends your vow are not recognised as real Bodhisattva vow has to be put in front of a living BUDDHA.
      And the living BUDDHA acknoledge it. Only then that is genuine.
      BUDDHAM SARANAM GACCHAMI
      Definately just a vow is empty.

    • @mnsamarasinghe
      @mnsamarasinghe 3 роки тому

      @@vijjanandadhammaa Arahat thero, may or may not know the darma and may or may not have the ability to teach someone to become enlightened. for instance, in first buddhist council, from all the thero who attended only the Anadna thero who wasn't arahat at that time(of course he became arahat just before the occasion ) had the knowladge of all the Lord Buddha's teachings.

    • @vijjanandadhamma
      @vijjanandadhamma 3 роки тому

      @@mnsamarasinghe so in fact majority of ARIYA can teach only if they intend to teach.
      BUDDHAM SARANAM GACCHAMI

  • @nimalasivakumar7706
    @nimalasivakumar7706 4 роки тому +51

    I like how he pronounces it correctly :)

    • @qwex4350
      @qwex4350 3 роки тому

      i think he’s also from the middle east

    • @nikhilsharma26500
      @nikhilsharma26500 3 роки тому +8

      @@qwex4350 nope he is from the US however his parents are from Indian subcontinent (one from India other from Bangladesh) perhaps this is the reason as to why he pronounced those names correctly.

    • @Cats18888
      @Cats18888 3 роки тому +1

      I think it’s so annoying pronounced correctly

    • @ragininorris5084
      @ragininorris5084 3 роки тому +6

      @@Cats18888 Is this ignorant or sarcastic?

    • @Cats18888
      @Cats18888 3 роки тому

      @@ragininorris5084 no it’s cause I actually think it’s annoying.

  • @jeffsimpson46
    @jeffsimpson46 Рік тому +6

    I like the idea that the Buddha can only show you the way. It is up to us to investigate and practice the Dhamma. We make the path as we walk the path.

  • @wrongnotes8385
    @wrongnotes8385 6 років тому +45

    Do not try to separate two great tradition of Buddha dharma.Both Theravada and Mahayana tradition contains great teachings and wisdom.We should embrace each other rather than trying to find out differences because both teachings came from the one and only mahayogi,mahapurus Tathagat (Siddhartha Gautama)..

    • @oclaothug69
      @oclaothug69 5 років тому +10

      A lot of people don't know the difference as simple as meals most people think monks can't eat meat this is wrong view only Mahayana can not eat meat.

    • @vijjanandadhamma
      @vijjanandadhamma 3 роки тому +2

      Theravada buddhist and Mahayana teaching are different.
      The two teaching is different when come to the end. The original one is theravada.
      In the time of the BUDDHA,
      The BUDDHA reject DEVADATA for asking all monk to go vegetarian and the buddha teaching to accept vegetarianism.The BUDDHA reject such request.
      And today vegetarian exist.
      So guy it is ver clear it is not the original teaching of the BUDDHA. There are many differences only those in the theravada will know.
      For new buddhist beginner they will not know.
      If these beginner go straight into the sector of mahayanis they they will never know that their buddhist are not the ways instructed by the BUDDHA.
      No need to explain further.
      BUDDHAM GACCHAMI

    • @kaustubhnigam628
      @kaustubhnigam628 3 роки тому +3

      @@vijjanandadhamma Buddha said not to eat meat
      In dhammapada he said not to slaughter or encourage slaughtering of animals
      In jivaka sutra he said the if the monk know that there is meat in his plate then he shouldn't eat it

    • @vijjanandadhamma
      @vijjanandadhamma 3 роки тому +2

      Wrong understanding about eating meat. The Buddha already explain very clearly. Those who propagate vegetarianism are not following the BUDDHA teaching. They misinterpreted the meaning of non killing.
      They forget it was DEVADATA that tries to promote vegetarianism.
      The BUDDHA reject his view on this matter.
      BUDDHAM SARANAM GACCHAMI

    • @kaustubhnigam628
      @kaustubhnigam628 3 роки тому +2

      @@vijjanandadhamma devadatta wasn't in favour of vegetarianism
      He just made it too strict that even if the monk didn't know that he was eating meat then he is committing sin.......devadatta was simply a hypocrite just like meat eating monks
      In jivaka sutta , Buddha said , when a monk didn't know that the food he was eating was meat then it's not his fault
      In dhammapada , Buddha said that put yourself in the place of animal being slaughtered , you will realise that slaughtering animals or encouraging it is bad and generate bad merit
      Buddha's dharma was in favour of non violence , not animal slaughter
      Hypocrite Meat eaters always misinterpret his dharma for their own desires (including meat eating)

  • @gyadre
    @gyadre 2 роки тому +5

    End goal of Mahayana is not Bodhisattva but Buddha hood. Mahayana remain as Bodhisattva to help others along the path to Buddhahood than going alone.
    Bodhisattva in Tibetan is translated as Jang Chup Sempa aka compassionate mind or soul.
    Arhat in Mahayana is one who has overcome / conquered all the causes of sins - desire, anger and ego.
    Arhat is stage below Bodhisattva. Bodhisattva is stage below Buddhahood or Buddha

  • @raymondlai4656
    @raymondlai4656 7 років тому +36

    Thank you, Khan Academy for taking your time, energy and effort to upload and share this video. I appreciate it.

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    10 characters🙏
    There are ten Fullfillments to do.
    1. Donations
    2. Keeping precepts
    3. Loving -kindness
    4. Diligence
    5. Fortitude
    6. Faithfulness
    7. Determination
    8. Patience
    9. Dedication
    10. Equanimity

  • @shadowwhisperer9687
    @shadowwhisperer9687 5 місяців тому +3

    Nirvana here is kind of biased. In theravada buddhism especially nirvana is not becoming born again and there is no concept of emptiness.

  • @abdulaleem9207
    @abdulaleem9207 2 роки тому +2

    i read a theory that mahasamgika sect from which mahayana evolved is the one that was majority sect and was closer to the buddha's teachings. it however became more diverse and became less original in comparison to theravada as time went on.

  • @SaitoArufa
    @SaitoArufa 7 місяців тому +2

    Well, Theravada way is like obtaining your fire yourself and sharing how you did it to others. Mahayana is like recruiting others to make fire together while you still haven't obtained it yourself.
    Let us see what Buddha himself did. He tried to obtain Nirvana himself and then he help others with how to obtain it.

    • @kamijounotouma666
      @kamijounotouma666 3 місяці тому

      Isn't spreading the dhamma, instructing, and teaching it to save sentient beings from the cycle of suffering?

    • @kamijounotouma666
      @kamijounotouma666 3 місяці тому

      In Theravada Buddhism, praying, chanting, ritual, worshipping and faith cannot escape the cycle of samsara and sentient beings only be freed from samsara if they rely on themselves and practice the Dhamma righteously.

  • @approachtotruthbysciencean4946
    @approachtotruthbysciencean4946 5 місяців тому +1

    Mahayana Buddhism that came to Japan includes sects such as Pure Land Buddhism, Esoteric Buddhism, Lotus Sutra, and Avatamsaka Sutra. I noticed that these sects preach about the universe. Pure Land Buddhism preaches about the Pure Land, a world of the pinnacle of awakening, ruled by Amitabha Buddha far away in the universe. Buddha speaks passionately about that world. Esoteric Buddhism preaches about awakening through compassion and wisdom by the super Buddha, Vairocana buddha, who personifies the universe. Avatamsaka Sutra is the content of Buddha's enlightenment itself, and preaches that the true form of the universe is fractal. And the Lotus Sutra, which is said to be the highest teaching, preaches about the eternal Buddha, which I think preaches about the cycle of life in the infinite universe. In other words, God (of monotheism) creates man, man attains enlightenment and becomes Buddha, the wisdom of Buddha acquires knowledge of life, and when man appears by that knowledge, Buddhas becomes God.

  • @nguyenhuyhoang1010
    @nguyenhuyhoang1010 6 днів тому

    Mahayana Buddhism from Vietnam 🇻🇳. Childhood watched Chinese TV series: Journey to the West (1986).
    Watched a long time ago Indian drama: Buddha (2013).

  • @divyanetkar5346
    @divyanetkar5346 6 місяців тому +1

    Buddhism is suppressed in India. India still has Buddhists but they don't get significant recognition.

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    Eight conditions
    1. The person must have fourth jana that can attain Nibbana easily( Near to Nibbana)
    2. The person must pray in front of one of the Buddhas( must wait one of the Buddhas)
    3. The person must be male
    4. Must be human to pray as buddhahood
    5. Must know causes and effects
    6. Must be filled with gratitude of jana
    7. Must do wholesome, giving own life if need
    8. Must aspire wholesome wish to be Buddha

  • @fool4287
    @fool4287 День тому

    CORRECTION !
    There are currently three main schools of Mahayana Buddhism, one of them is Pure Land Buddhism with approximately 22,000,000 members. The two other main schools of current Mahayana Buddhist thought are Chan (Zen) with approximately 5,300,000 members & Tiantai (Examples of this Lotus Sutra school are the Nichiren Shōshū /priesthood with approximately 800,000 member households & the Soka Gakkai a lay organization with about 13,000,000 members).
    Please update this video ...

  • @damncuber6634
    @damncuber6634 6 років тому +18

    It's a big good karma and bless so I can born as a Buddhism and to learn both of that tradition.😊 Sabbe Satta Bhavantu Sukhitatta , Amitabha

  • @JuanLopez-tp7hj
    @JuanLopez-tp7hj 3 роки тому +4

    Thanks for the explanation I always wondered about the different kinds

  • @LoveyDovey9000
    @LoveyDovey9000 7 років тому +52

    🙏Proud Buddhist 🙏

    • @whataworld884
      @whataworld884 7 років тому +1

      love

    • @whataworld884
      @whataworld884 7 років тому +4

      BuzzFeedPink No, it just isn't. There is nothing wring with being proud about something. However, ego is.

    • @Alusnovalotus
      @Alusnovalotus 6 років тому +2

      LoveyDovey9000 hmm interesting oxymoron

    • @Alusnovalotus
      @Alusnovalotus 6 років тому +2

      Maybe happy Buddhist?

    • @suakamaraga5451
      @suakamaraga5451 6 років тому +2

      Homage to the Triple Gem (Buddha, Dhamma, Sangha)
      “I take refuge in the Buddha, I take refuge in the dharma, I take refuge in the sangha.

  • @dataxglobal
    @dataxglobal Рік тому

    Thanks for pronouncing the words correctly.

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    About Fourth Jana
    To go Fourth Jana, have to start with First Jana
    First Jana
    Applied thought, Sustained thought, Rapture, Bliss, One-pointedness of mind
    Applied thought= trying to focus on breath
    Sustained thought = stable on breath ( no thinking)
    Rapture = pure state with joyfulness
    Bliss= Feeling peace and joyfulness
    One-pointedness of mind= calmness upon peace and joyfulness
    Second Jana
    Will start with stable breath
    Sustained thought, Rapture, Bliss, One-pointedness of mind
    Third jana
    Will start with rapture during sitting time
    Rapture, Bliss, One-pointedness of mind
    Fourth jana
    Bliss and One-pointedness of
    mind
    Pers Fourth Jana can become back third jana, second jana, first jana if there is no insight vippasana.

  • @petagonkyi
    @petagonkyi 7 років тому +5

    The ultimate aim of Mahayanist is Buddhahood which is far beyond Nirvana. Arhat has already achieved Nirvana - escape from cyclic existence - aka Samsara.

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому +2

    As for normal beings, can worship both Gods, Angles and Buddha because Gods and angels take care their respective relatives.
    As for Ariya, they have to worship only Buddha.
    If ariya worship normal Angle, humen and God, normal humen, angles and Gods can dissipate.

    • @shunlaiei5981
      @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

      Among Ariya, they can worship each teacher depending on the purity stage.

    • @kamijounotouma666
      @kamijounotouma666 3 місяці тому

      Yes, ordinary people worship beings who have great powers, but divine beings, powerful beings, worship saints who are virtuous, integrity and wise.

  • @sanaka123
    @sanaka123 6 років тому +5

    Pronunciation is pretty good. Some of the words and names are generally mangled but not here.

    • @bikdigdaddy
      @bikdigdaddy 4 роки тому

      @Andrew Friend really??! Is he an Indian?

  • @Sabinhimalayensis
    @Sabinhimalayensis 6 років тому +5

    Thanks for sharing this beautiful information on budhhism..... From Nepal

  • @mirmir9368
    @mirmir9368 2 роки тому +4

    In the Malay/Indo language, there are a lot of borrowed words from Sanskrit, such as:
    Sengsara: Miserable
    Duka: Grief
    Sukahati: Joy
    Budi: Courtesy

    • @princehigh3415
      @princehigh3415 2 роки тому

      Malays were Buddhist before they adopted islam and before Buddhist they worshippped ancestors and nature .Tomorrow these same Malays will become Christians as many of them are already athieist and dont believe in anything .

    • @mirmir9368
      @mirmir9368 2 роки тому

      @@princehigh3415 I do not get your point because I was saying that in MALAY/INDO LANGUAGE, there are a lot of words BORROWED from SANSKRIT.

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому

      @@mirmir9368 nalanda great indian university and mainly buddist university got burnt by these barbaric islamic invasion all indian relgions declined and only culture is intact, i am actually thankful to tibetian buddist and indian rishi who translated teachings from sanskrit to tibetian lang thanks to all suth east asian for saving indian culture/philosophies

    • @mirmir9368
      @mirmir9368 2 роки тому +1

      @@lll2282 You are welcome. We still have preserved a lot of ancient Hindu traditions as well.

    • @gytan2221
      @gytan2221 Рік тому

      Ini sebab bahasa melayu kuno dapat pengaruh daripada Sanskrit.

  • @Rixxxxo
    @Rixxxxo 3 роки тому +3

    the way he says buddhism in these videos has me feeling some type of way lol

  • @Prizabella
    @Prizabella 2 роки тому +14

    Theravada is the original unchanged preserved teachings of Gautam Buddha. It can lead to enlightenment. Whereas Mahayana Buddhism was formed after 500 years after Gautam Buddha's Nirvana or passing away. Mahayana Buddhism was edited over the period of time by monks adding this Buddha and that Buddha and Bodhisattva etc for worshipping including change of attire, way of living, adding more requirements into scriptures thus making the original Gautam Buddha's teachings impure. Over the course of time, It became more suitable for ordinary people instead of practicing actual cultivation to reach enlightenment. Mahayana was widely spread across other countries like China, Japan and South east Asia. Theravada was an orthodox cultivation practice and not a religion. Whereas Mahayana turned into a religion called Buddhism over the course of centuries.

    • @Ajamidha
      @Ajamidha Рік тому +2

      Yup , Adi Shankaracharya defeated Mahayana in debate but i suppose it would have been a tie if he debated Theravada

    • @stealthworx4371
      @stealthworx4371 Рік тому

      @@Ajamidha Advaita Vedanta is also a very beautiful philosophy. Im a theravadin and have started to dabble in this school. Im at that stage of grasping duality vs non duality. Its very esoterical compared to most "religious" ideologies.

    • @vassanab4243
      @vassanab4243 Рік тому

      What do you mean that Theravada is not religion, my country is Thailand, and majority of Thai people are Theravada Buddhists

  • @Absolut531kmh
    @Absolut531kmh Рік тому +1

    I'm Mahayana Buddhism practicioner.

  • @atipatlorwongam
    @atipatlorwongam 7 років тому +13

    Actually, Bodhisattva means someone who are becoming/Will become a buddha. If all focus to be Buddha - (Bodhisattva), there will be no one to help nor achieve Nirvana. So there is a direct straight way to Nirvana,There also is another loop for you to lock you there never get to nirvana. so choose wisely ^ ^

  • @ukt26x
    @ukt26x 10 місяців тому

    Explained correctly, Thanks ❤

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    Some meditators make jana focusing on womb to make concentration.
    Just focus on one object first to go vippasana( insight meditation)
    This is for beings who would like to attain and go Nibbana( absolute peace)

  • @aazamben4582
    @aazamben4582 5 років тому +22

    I like Theravada

    • @peacebe2u480
      @peacebe2u480 4 роки тому +5

      Hahaha... it is not about like or dislike. This very idea is totally wrong. Very discriminating mind.. the teaching will lead you to transcend this discriminatory mind set.
      U should say.. preference or affinity.

  • @evapektas
    @evapektas 10 місяців тому

    The best explanation

  • @grandeurofgandhara6407
    @grandeurofgandhara6407 2 роки тому +1

    Beautifully explained

  • @corsaircaruso471
    @corsaircaruso471 4 роки тому +2

    From what I remember, the “th” in “Theravada” doesn’t inidcate the English “th” sound as in the word “thin,” it actually represents the initial, aspirated “t” sound in the English word “tear.” It differentiates from the non-aspirated “t” found in the English word “stop” or as used in Spanish or Italian.
    EDIT: At 0:10 and 5:40 you use the unaspirated “t” that I mentioned in English “stop,” and as used in Spanish and Italian.

  • @dennischu3322
    @dennischu3322 2 роки тому

    which books have you referred to?

  • @dilipsharma9623
    @dilipsharma9623 6 років тому +3

    nice video Thankyou sir

  • @petagonkyi
    @petagonkyi 7 років тому +18

    In India Buddhist were absorbed into Hinduism plus the repeated Turkic invasion of India lead to the collapse of Buddhism in India and Bangladesh etc from 10AD onwards.
    In fact most of Central Asian countries including Pakistan and Pakistan were Buddhist they were first to succumb to Arab invasion since 7AD. The founder of Zen, Chan Buddhism practiced in China, Japan, Korea and Vietnam is Buddhist monk brothers Äsanga and Vasu Bandu from Peshawar, Pakistan around 4AD.
    The founder of Tibetan Buddhism hails from Swat region of Pakistan who escaped Pakistan following the religious persecution and moved east wards towards India and Nepal and finally came to Tibet via Nepal at the invitation of Tibetan king in 8AD.

    • @dhitikabarua1779
      @dhitikabarua1779 7 років тому +7

      Even east Afghanistan... Look at gabdhara Buddhist sites! All are destroyed!

    • @believer1465
      @believer1465 6 років тому +4

      Peta Gonkyi if you still beleive this you are living in dark ...historical data proved that buddhism was destroyed by brahmins beacause buddhism rejected cast system and blind faith and devotion to many gods which was a threat to brahmin dominancy...
      Buddhism remained the dominant faith in india for atleast 1000 years before being destroyed by brahmins...
      Islam only had a little role in it. .

    • @Sawo-500
      @Sawo-500 3 роки тому

      @@dhitikabarua1779 How did the Bengalis get Theravada Buddhism? Mahayana Buddhism was first practiced by the Bengalis. How did Theravada Buddhism come about?

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому

      actually chan and zen is corrupted sanskrit word for dhyan which is a sort of yoga and meditative practices practised by all ancient relgions of india .

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому +2

      @@believer1465 there was no csuch thing as caste system and would u mind giving evideance of caste system ? all u said was mehhh

  • @LuigiMontesi
    @LuigiMontesi 3 роки тому

    Searching this subject and nice surprise ur voice in the video.

  • @righttoequality3136
    @righttoequality3136 2 роки тому +5

    Proud to be a Buddhist 💙

  • @stewartthomas2642
    @stewartthomas2642 2 роки тому

    Good vid. . Love your stuff kick on love it 👍

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    Arimettaya Buddha have already attained Fourth Jana before his lives
    8,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000( zero 140 in front of 8 + 100000 worlds)
    There are ten parami buddha filled.
    1. Donation
    2. Sila( keeping precepts)
    3. Abandoning
    4. Wisdom
    5. Effort
    6. Fortitude
    7. Faithfulness
    8. Loving -kindness
    9. Patience
    10. impassableness

  • @vegahimsa3057
    @vegahimsa3057 5 років тому +14

    Theravada (teachings of the elders) generally uses the Pali terms (because the most complete collection of the original teachings of the Buddha are in Pali), so arahant, nibbana, etc.
    The Mahayana generally use hybrid Sanskrit terms (despite the Buddha explicitly forbidding it) presumably to appeal to the growing popularity of brahminism in India (and later traditions such as tantra, which literally means weaving threads from many traditions including one's own home brew new ageism). "Great vehicle" is correct but "maha" also means wider, majority, popular, and that's important to understand when discussion the (de)evolution of Buddhist teachings and practice.

    • @homelesslavie_vlogs9600
      @homelesslavie_vlogs9600 4 роки тому +2

      Mahayana buddhism is more influenced by Hinduism, Ganesh,Tara(Durga), Mahakal(Shiva) etc are important Gods and Godesses in Mahayana buddhism.

    • @vegahimsa3057
      @vegahimsa3057 4 роки тому +4

      @@homelesslavie_vlogs9600 I believe more common in tantra, primarily Tibetan Vajrayana.

    • @renatomatos90
      @renatomatos90 3 роки тому +1

      @@homelesslavie_vlogs9600 also mahayana is strong influenced by chinese culture.

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому

      @@vegahimsa3057 tibetans adopted lot of hindu gods just ask them they better know it and tara is godess durga or kali , tibeitan gods are hindu gods in Tibetan version

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому +2

    There is only Dhamma.
    Dhamma include realities.
    🌸Theravada kept all realities Gotama Buddha taught.
    Exact teachings and methods to go Nibbana, heavens, brahmins.
    Gotama Buddha taught all.
    Including history
    Brighten self
    In Theravada, they have already attained Nibbana with different levels.
    Some ariya will wait Next Buddha, knowing and attaining Nibbana.🌸
    In Mahayana, most will wait next Buddha with humen conditions with Zen and donations.
    🌸Some 🌸have already attained Nibbana.
    Both are the same.
    All Buddhas teach the same about Dhamma.
    Brighten yourself
    You will arrive where you walks
    There are ways for everywhere you walk

    • @shunlaiei5981
      @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

      You can brighten and share all Buddhas teach

  • @ituwilli9647
    @ituwilli9647 3 роки тому +4

    i not believe budhis mahaya, i only believe budhis therawada !!

  • @JasonLynn-dm9ej
    @JasonLynn-dm9ej 3 місяці тому

    In Theravada tradition, the use of the term "bodhisattva" is very limited - primarily referring to the Buddha Shakyamuni in his previous lives before enlightenment; and actually there is just ONE bodhisattva - Maitreya or Metteyya, THE future Buddha, generally recognized; and
    that there can only be ONE Buddha at a time

  • @paulinewqi
    @paulinewqi 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for sharing so much information on Buddhism....

  • @EyouthChakma
    @EyouthChakma 7 місяців тому

    I have got a question.. Do the Mahayana buddhists worship the Gautam Buddha like we do? Or it is only the Bodhisattvas?

    • @mennododen5271
      @mennododen5271 7 місяців тому

      In Mahayana, too, you take Refuge to the three jewels. 🙏

  • @bikrammmagarr8251
    @bikrammmagarr8251 5 років тому +8

    Siddhartha Gautam Buddha was born in the place called Lumbini, in Nepal.

    • @homelesslavie_vlogs9600
      @homelesslavie_vlogs9600 4 роки тому +3

      But he got enlightenment in India, spent most of his life in India and got nirvana in India. Cremated in India too.

    • @airavatham878
      @airavatham878 2 роки тому

      @@portraying_my_life Indian subcontinent

    • @shreyashshambharkar7684
      @shreyashshambharkar7684 Рік тому

      ​@@homelesslavie_vlogs9600🔥🔥🔥👍🏻

    • @Wisdom-vn7gc
      @Wisdom-vn7gc Місяць тому

      There was no modern India or Nepal back then. But he was born in Shakya Republic of Indian subcontinent.

  • @filsdejeannoir1776
    @filsdejeannoir1776 2 роки тому

    1:23 "Recognizing the 'non-self', that we are all one"??

  • @lll2282
    @lll2282 2 роки тому +1

    thats actually true as indian and hindu , Hinduism has so many sects and lot of sects have its sub sects that it all got compromised into hinduism, hindu is actually geographical identity of ancient india and Hinduism means idea ,philosophies of india thus we got all the name as Hinduism but in reality there nothing such as Hinduism its bunch of various ancient indian philosophies . theravada is similar to orthodox hindusim and mahyaana to present day hindusim

  • @arunak5758
    @arunak5758 2 роки тому +2

    Namo buddhay

  • @jbb2660
    @jbb2660 3 роки тому +1

    Very well explained 👏👏

  • @jom.a.md.s.h.2206
    @jom.a.md.s.h.2206 2 роки тому

    All is Great 🙏🙏🙏

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    The former Buddha's meditation time was six years to attain Buddha wisdom, attaining Nibbana
    Next Buddha mediation time will be 7 days. After seven days, Arimettaya Buddha will become Buddha, attaining Nibbana

  • @lypukhalay9558
    @lypukhalay9558 6 років тому +2

    2:55 "Bodhisatta" I think you refer to "Buddisat" such as "Giun Ing", the holy goddess known to all Mahayana Buddhists. 😊 Nice research

    • @invokingvajras
      @invokingvajras 3 роки тому

      What language is that?

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому

      @@invokingvajras sanskrit

    • @dataxglobal
      @dataxglobal Рік тому +1

      Female bodhisattva? Are you kidding? Get over your fairy tales please

    • @big2451
      @big2451 Рік тому

      ​@@dataxglobalYou're sexist.

  • @yrasphong
    @yrasphong 7 років тому +4

    Theravada in the house

  • @CreativeVery
    @CreativeVery 6 років тому +2

    Is 0:10 really how you pronounce Theravada? It sounds like a weird spanish pronunciation.

    • @chaitanyatalegaonkar8629
      @chaitanyatalegaonkar8629 6 років тому

      Doctor Cereal Actually it is pronounced as Tha-era-wad..

    • @Audie63
      @Audie63 3 роки тому

      Not in Southeast Asia. It's pronounced terra-wadda here. In Pali, the language of the Early Buddhist Texts, th = tt, which is t with a little extra punch.

    • @zhang22s
      @zhang22s 2 місяці тому

      We pronounce it tey ra wah dah

  • @tsurugi5
    @tsurugi5 11 місяців тому

    1:20
    not Buddhism, that’s monism and was one of the positions explicitly rejected by the very Buddha himself. Turns out some things do get lost and distorted when they enter pop culture.

  • @gayathriuggalla4666
    @gayathriuggalla4666 6 років тому +9

    Buddhan Saranan gacchami ☸️🙏

    • @edjordan265
      @edjordan265 5 років тому +1

      GAYATHRI UGGALLA Dhammam saranam gacchami

    • @AnimeFan-xb7yn
      @AnimeFan-xb7yn 5 років тому

      That's my fav mantra

  • @Sloth7d
    @Sloth7d 7 років тому +7

    Are you going to cover Journey to the West?

  • @TheRogueRockhound
    @TheRogueRockhound 4 роки тому

    Alright Khan, what do you think? Was Li Mu Bai a Bodhisattva?

  • @darapichchanhuy7543
    @darapichchanhuy7543 6 років тому +5

    nirvana is very hard to obtain .

  • @lypukhalay9558
    @lypukhalay9558 6 років тому +1

    Hinayana is defined by some as a bad term since Mahayana means "yana", vehicle & "Maha", collosal, thus collosal vehicle; which makes hinayana means "destruction vehicle" because "hin" means decay or abomination. However, hinayana can also defined as small/self vehicle. Hence, hinayana=theravada, both means personally believe to find oneself a middle way towards Nirvana (according to my understanding).

  • @bobmomgodbob
    @bobmomgodbob 5 років тому +3

    Buddhism is really cool

  • @Sueloveschoc
    @Sueloveschoc 7 років тому +8

    I wondered what happened to the Hinayana sect (we learnt in school that the sects were Mahayana and Hinayana). Hinayana is supposedly the older version of the Theravada (according to the internet).

    • @TheIcyLotus
      @TheIcyLotus 7 років тому

      Sueloveschoc
      Hinayana is a category in which Theravada is a part of, like how Mahayana is a category which Pureland is a part of.

    • @khinewai9965
      @khinewai9965 7 років тому +8

      Mahayana called Theravada as Hinayana. Hinayana is kind of a bad name.

    • @cupwave2
      @cupwave2 7 років тому +13

      Hinayana is a pejorative used by some Mahayana Buddhists in the past to describe Theravada. It means "lesser vehicle" and is largely no longer used because it's a pejorative.

    • @boonpaul8749
      @boonpaul8749 7 років тому +3

      Theravada was the correct and original one. "Hinayana" word came later and used by some Mahayana Buddhists

    • @petagonkyi
      @petagonkyi 7 років тому +1

      Hinayana terminology was used earlier and was replaced by Theravada as word Hinayana has a tinge of derogatory (Hina meaning smaller) Theravada (elders) is more appropriate.

  • @andrewdodds3007
    @andrewdodds3007 5 років тому +4

    I have a question do I have to be a monastic to attain Nivarna?
    I follow Therevada closely as I believe It the most!

    • @indikindy01
      @indikindy01 4 роки тому +1

      Good to here Andrew. Always rely on 'Tripitaka' (Theravada means if you follow Tripitaka) and try to study deep step by step. and after sometimes (could be in few years) try to step in to 'Long Discourses of the Buddha [Digha Nikaya] in Tripitaka, you will be amazed and see how this world lag behind in terms of science compared to Buddhism.
      We all should keep one thing in mind that is, even the most reverend monk tells you something which is not in the Tripitaka (or against) just dont belive and still rely on Tripitaka. Because Tripitaka has the answers for everything. That is a personal experience. Day by day i get very precious answers for all the doubts i have, i just have to listen to Tripitaka Sutta. thats it.
      Answer for your question.. no.. you dont have to be a monastic to attain Nirvana. There are thousands of examples for this which you could find from the Tripitaka's sutta...

    • @truthseeker7759
      @truthseeker7759 3 роки тому

      It is a very tricky question and depend on the tradition you are following. There is NO original or authentic teachings but Theravada is the oldest to survive. At the time of Buddha's parinibbana there had been 12 known schools and most disappeared leaving what we now call Theravada, the teachings of the elders. Having said that according to Theravada one has to be a monastic to achieve Nibbana at the fourth stage, not a lay person. Study Dhamma objectively not as a blind faith, yes some are, mostly the traditionalist finding it uncomfortable in doing so. Nevertheless whether the dhamma is original, pure or whatever what we have in most traditions are very inspiring, as we have to trek a long journey to understand them. There is no point bickering as to what is the purest or original. Hope this will help in your search in understanding your own existence with the help of Buddha Dhamma. Cheers

    • @pinklasagna8328
      @pinklasagna8328 2 роки тому

      Its better if you live a monastic life according to vinaya. But attaining nirvana is a process that takes multiple lives.

  • @kunzukisai1013
    @kunzukisai1013 5 років тому +7

    I am from myanmar 😃and Theravada buddhism 😁

    • @tausifkarim8861
      @tausifkarim8861 5 років тому +2

      I'm a Muslim from Bangladesh.We are neighbours my friend :3

    • @indikindy01
      @indikindy01 4 роки тому +3

      im from Sri Lanka. did you know, your 'Burma Tripitaka and Sri lankan Tripitaka are exactly the same. 84000 lessons and still the same except 1 or 2 letters not even a single word and that also doesnt change the meaning. Amazing ahhhhhh

    • @kunzukisai1013
      @kunzukisai1013 4 роки тому +2

      Ya!my mother was supplied to a monk to attemt in buddha collage of Sri lanka.i will come to SL if that monk degree!❣ i hope to see buddha tooth pagoda.❣

    • @kunzukisai1013
      @kunzukisai1013 4 роки тому

      @@tausifkarim8861 i have one of muslim fri😉 we are fri from childhood to now.😀 i have only three friend and another one is chrisim.

  • @bobmomgodbob
    @bobmomgodbob 5 років тому +7

    Yeet love y’all ☸️🖤

  • @prbartstudio8065
    @prbartstudio8065 4 роки тому +1

    .again and again thanks

  • @jmhsieh7103
    @jmhsieh7103 3 роки тому

    I am Mahayana born buddhist specifically of the ning mapa school the oldest Mahayana group.

  • @souravjyotisivam5246
    @souravjyotisivam5246 4 роки тому +1

    Om mani padme hun 🙏🙏namo aryaputra buddha joy mahayana

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    Buddhas
    Fourth Jana+10 characters +8 conditions + practicing

  • @nurlatifahmohdnor8939
    @nurlatifahmohdnor8939 Рік тому

    Page 715
    Mahayana = n a a liberal Buddhist school of Tibet, China, and Japan, whose adherents seek enlightment for all sentient beings. b (as modifier): Mahayana Buddhism. [from Sansk., from mahä great + yäna vehicle]

  • @අහසතරනයලංකාපුර

    We are liveing in Sri Lanka natrule Buddhist house

  • @Tsukuyomi28
    @Tsukuyomi28 6 років тому +5

    You didn't mention how theravada kinda stopped meditating because they thought it was pointless until maitreya came

    • @JudoMateo
      @JudoMateo 4 роки тому +3

      Tsukuyomi no Mikoto What a misunderstood statement. Theravada has had pockets of serious meditators for its entire existence sir.

    • @indikindy01
      @indikindy01 4 роки тому +6

      actually Therevada (Tipitaka ) explains about 40 types of 'samatha' meditations and countless of 'vidarshana' meditations. But Theravada always recommend to meditate with the proper knowledge and guidance.

    • @pinklasagna8328
      @pinklasagna8328 2 роки тому

      Where did you get that information? That is false

    • @Tsukuyomi28
      @Tsukuyomi28 2 роки тому

      @@pinklasagna8328 I remembered it wrong it was specifically vipassana that fell out of use. They still practiced a form of meditation where they focus on something. Vipassana is a different kind of meditation.

    • @pinklasagna8328
      @pinklasagna8328 2 роки тому

      @@Tsukuyomi28 theravada still practice vipassana. They call it vidarshana too. Where did you get the idea that vipassana was rejected in theravada? However in theravada vipassana is not recommended for the newbie in meditation because vipassana is extremely difficult.

  • @luvsuneja
    @luvsuneja 7 років тому +5

    Also, Vajrayana Buddhist believe it is possible to become a full fledged Buddha in one lifetime.

  • @triple_gem_shining
    @triple_gem_shining Рік тому +1

    Its obvious you have more knowledge personally of Mahayana. You barely said anything about theravada that makes it unique.

  • @roktoprobal9505
    @roktoprobal9505 Рік тому

    Namo Buddhaya 🙏

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    Next Buddha, Arimettaya
    How many lives the next buddha cycled in Samsara as buddhahood?
    8,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000( zero 140 in front of 4) A thin Chay lifes and 100000 worlds

  • @jacap2362
    @jacap2362 7 років тому +9

    what was the purpose of buddha 84k methods of teaching? to benefit all sentient beings.
    why not 1 method of teaching to all sentient beings?
    because every individual capacity of understanding were different.
    same {DESTINATION=ENLIGHTENMENT} differ {ROUTES=TEACHING}.
    theravada or mahayana? pure mind see all equal.
    happy learning people ))

  • @jordanthehow-toyoutuber8951
    @jordanthehow-toyoutuber8951 7 років тому +2

    Sal, how do you decide on the topics for your videos? They are all so great!

  • @julierhiyoum117
    @julierhiyoum117 3 роки тому +5

    ཐེགས་དམན་-theravada
    ཐེགས་ཆེན་- mahayana

  • @aarini1300
    @aarini1300 7 років тому +13

    i wAS WATCHING THIS foR WORLD HJSTORY AND I WAS SO HAPPY WHEN HE DIDNT PRONOUNCE IT LIKE “BOODISM”

  • @nyclee9133
    @nyclee9133 6 років тому +1

    Which one goes like zen

    • @crisoDIY
      @crisoDIY 6 років тому

      Lee curly taoism

    • @kartikmann_
      @kartikmann_ 3 роки тому +1

      Mahayana

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому +1

      actually chan and zen is corrupted sanskrit word for dhyan which is a sort of yoga and meditative practices practised by all ancient relgions of india .

  • @SG-OO7
    @SG-OO7 5 років тому +1

    Thank you it helped me a lot

  • @jjhbjhbhjgjhgfjhghjg
    @jjhbjhbhjgjhgfjhghjg 7 років тому +4

    what is older Hindusim or Budhsim

    • @frankm.2850
      @frankm.2850 7 років тому +14

      Jason Morris Hinduism is MUCH older than Buddhism. Hinduism and Buddhism shares the same relationship as Christianity and Judaism.

    • @otomackena7610
      @otomackena7610 7 років тому +17

      You cant compare it in the sense of Relationship between Christianity and Judaism .The relationship between Dharmic religions are much closer than that .

    • @dawnfm00
      @dawnfm00 7 років тому +13

      Jason Morris Rig Veda (the oldest Hindu scripture) dates back to 1900 B.C. whereas Buddha was born in 624 B.C. but the earliest Upanisads might be contemporary to Buddha or maybe a little later because the idea of Upanisadic beliefs is completely absent in Tipitaka. Later on so many developments took place in Hinduism which are of course later in time as compared to Buddhism

    • @lshulman58
      @lshulman58 7 років тому +2

      Upanishads would be from about the same time as Buddhism (overlapping by a few hundred years). Buddhism starts in 6th century BCE. Upanishads date from approximately 800-400 BCE. Puranas may come later (though distinguish between oral and written, as oral traditions, these texts would be likely as much as several centuries or more earlier than the written versions).

    • @DerMessiasderSatire
      @DerMessiasderSatire 7 років тому +4

      Buddha was a Hindu,explained?

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 7 місяців тому

    How many lives the former buddha cycled in Samsara as buddhahood?
    4,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000( zero 140 in front of 4) A thin Chay lifes and 100000 worlds

  • @avatamsakavegan6414
    @avatamsakavegan6414 5 років тому +9

    How can Polytheistic Hinduism compare itself to Non-Theistic Buddhism; especially Mahayana Buddhism? The two are like chalk and cheese (vegan cheese).

    • @realtalk6195
      @realtalk6195 3 роки тому +11

      You have a distorted and possibly romanticized Western view of Buddhism. In actuality most Buddhists across all three major sects are polytheistic as they've incorporated worship of local deities and spirits. Many Mahayana, most Vijrayana and practically all Theravada monks eat meat as well. Overall most Buddhist people and monks eat meat.

    • @kartikmann_
      @kartikmann_ 3 роки тому

      Read more about either philosophy.

    • @nikhilsharma26500
      @nikhilsharma26500 3 роки тому +6

      Buddhism is by no means non-theistic, you can look up for Buddhist gods and goddesses in Japan and you'll find a great buch of them are actually hindu gods/goddesses (Benzaiten for eg)

    • @knowledgedesk1653
      @knowledgedesk1653 3 роки тому +2

      Define "Hinduism". Than anyone can explain.

    • @worlddata8982
      @worlddata8982 2 роки тому +1

      @@realtalk6195
      •Theism- Believe in onle God/many Gods and believe in God/Gods as creator, ruler and destroyer.
      •Monotheism- a form of theism. Believe in one God as a creator,ruler and destroyer.
      •Polytheism- a form of theism. Believe in many Gods and have separate Gods for create, rule and destroy.
      •Non theism- Believe in existence of gods but don't believe in God/Gods as creator, ruler and destroyer. Gods are just creatures.
      •Agnostism- Not sure God exists or not.
      •Atheism- Don't believe in existence of God.
      Buddhism is a non-theistic religion. Buddhism say there are Gods. But They are creatures in heavens. Buddhism say there are no creator, almighty and immortal God/Gods.
      Buddhists can eat meat. Buddhism don't force people to become vegetarians.

  • @steelnerve5683
    @steelnerve5683 2 роки тому +1

    non-Buddhists keep on blabbering about Buddhism, with superficiality.
    escaping from suffering...an example.

    • @logangreen759
      @logangreen759 2 роки тому

      How to escape from suffering according to you ??

  • @kuan9950
    @kuan9950 7 років тому +3

    "incarnation" in hinduism is much different then what the Buddha taught as "rebirth".

    • @djmuscovy7525
      @djmuscovy7525 6 років тому

      Marvel Prime Poop. Could you point to a good webpage for comparison? Do all Hinduism schools agree on reincarnation?

    • @NishantSingh-qe7vv
      @NishantSingh-qe7vv 3 роки тому +1

      @@djmuscovy7525 yes all do but they believe in permanent unchanging soul and buddhists beleive in anatma ,no permanent coninuing soul but desires that take birth

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому +1

      @@NishantSingh-qe7vv u are wrong there is no such thing as permanent changing soul they are same soul in different body and cycle continues until u attained moksha

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому +1

      @@NishantSingh-qe7vv also athma is the cocept of hindusim

  • @suwanthadarshana8495
    @suwanthadarshana8495 5 років тому +7

    theravada is the real teaching of buddha...👈

  • @rainynight02
    @rainynight02 7 місяців тому

    I am so confused. I thought when you achieved enlightenment that was being a Buddha.
    But being an arhat is having achieved enlightenment? What?