Hope you liked the video! Oh and... suggest me some different scenarios (that is not a simple A to B flight) to recreate in one of my next videos. Thanks for all the support! :)
Decent video if too long, but where's the traffic control audio? We get no idea of communication between flight crews and controllers that would have made this much more interesting.
@@6z0 Yet it was. It really happened in Barcelona airport. You can find it out in youtube ua-cam.com/video/DL83eT_CNC8/v-deo.html , but the airplanes are other Utair and Skyteam.
I really like this channel, also when "everyone survives" but could this have been done in a 3 minute summary. Also, it was ATC missing communications and CVR which is part of the interest, even when nothing happens.
@@NotTheRambo Yes. On July 5th 2014, between flight AR-1163, and Aerolineas Argentinas Airbus A340-300, which was taxiing, and flight UT-5187, a UTAir Boeing 767-300 that tried to land. See ua-cam.com/video/1N5THRSp4hM/v-deo.html
there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
@@dominicindoubt , A lot of people thought it was a recreation of a real incident. Read the comments. That's what we are used to seeing here. If we're going to fake a video then why not fate some atc conversation to go with it. And it's "he".
there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
Panda's are making a come back due to breeding programs! China and the USA have an agreement. Any panda cubs born in the USA must return back to China when the panda turns 4 years old! And yes, they are shipped back on the Panda Express! In 2023 the contract will end with China/USA! All Pandas in the USA will be shipped back to China! That's gonna be a lot of Panda Express flights! It's actually gonna be great to see them go home! The pilots of those flights BETTER NOT make any stupid mistakes!
Very minor point but in your description you say "near collision between two aircrafts..." It's perfectly acceptable to use the singular form of "aircraft" even if multiples are described. Just like the word 'deer' is both singular & plural - if several we still say 'deer' not "deers". Make sense ? I know English has a LOT of unspoken rules that are hard to grasp - just trying to be helpful. Really love all your Aviation recreations, TFC !
Mother Goose - I feel I must correct you. It is not "perfectly acceptable to use the singular form of 'aircraft'." It is actually wrong not to. Single or multiple, it is always aircraft. Just trying to be helpful.
@@vojta4045 no, not a hate comment at all, its a video of an incident that never happened! might as well watch the simpsons, in fact I will from now on
@@PolaryMP there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
This video is a fiction, but it models closely to a real near miss at Barcelona airport in 2014. I believe it involved a Boeing 767 from Russian airline Utair, and an Airbus A340 flown by Aerolineas Argentinas. The Boeing was landing and the Airbus taxied across its path.
there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
I can't help but imagine what it'd be like in the cockpit of the FedEx jet; which would be more entertaining: them not realizing just how close they came to disaster, or them seeing the incoming plane and thinking "no rain, no snow, no landing craft will stop this delivery!" and just went on ahead. I'm sure there's more to it than that (ATC neglecting to give clearance, etc), but that's the scenario in my head. Nice video!
I do not understand the confusion with people asking this to be remade with more details. All these videos start with "This is a true story based on official reports and eyewitness accounts" - except this one, because it's not a simulation of any real flight, even though I'm sure its happened before. Further, the lack of any flight numbers or ATC communication or detail on the pilots furthers this point. It is simply a scenario.
I used to work for an airline. Did ticket counter, gate, and ramp. Wing-walking scared the shit out of me at first cause I used to think I'd get sucked into the engines. Those things are no joke when they start up. But I loved the ramp. And interacting with the pilots. Never was a problem while I was there, I'm from Boston, so I worked at Boston-Logan International Airport. It was a great experience. My worst experience was helping put a dead body on the plane. I think it was military. Now that was sad. But I'd also say flying for free wasn't a bad perk of the job. 😉✈💺.
Not that these are not great also, but Wow, I can realky tell you've come along way in past 2 years, creating these videos! The ones you do now are just so massively, ultra realistic! Great work as always! One of my very fav YT channels!
An Utair Boeing 767-300 (VQ-BSX) incoming from Moscow as UT5187 and Aerolíneas Argentinas Airbus A340-300 (LV-FPV) were involved into what could be the bigger disaster of Barcelona Airport. 'The Utair 767 was about to land on Runway 02 while the Argentinas was crossing the runway. 'By the time russian pilots sight Argentinas (they were taxiing to Holding point of RW25R for take-off) on runway while they were on final approach, they did their best making an impressive and close go around. 'After that incidence the plane landed safely on runway 02, and the Argentinas took-off heading Buenos Aires.' [sic]
How lucky that the pilot of the landing plane "one world" was alert or this was a disaster! It should NOT happen. What is the control tower for? .There are human lives involved with such risks !!!
In the US at least current FAA regulations demand that crew check in with tower on every runway entry/crossing and confirm clearance up to the minute. Unless up-to-date clearance is issued near the runway entry sign (usually clearly marked with a huge red background) the crew must stop and wait for clearance. (this rule was a result of multiple disasters worldwide where such runway incursions led to a collision) I would love to see the transcript of tower communications during this incident.
It seems to me that ATC's are given way to many planes under their charge. They literally have the most crucial jobs in ensuring everyone's safety, and there are just too many near misses everyday.
That 777 fight crew were totally ignorant of the havoc almost wrought by their runway incursion caused by a total inattention to detail. That 747 Crew took little time with initiating power up and immediate go-around! Whew!
Why not do a few Soviet/Russian incidents. Bashkirian Airlines Flight 2937 & DHL Flight 611 was an extremely tragic mid-air collision. More so given the fate of the air-traffic controller afterwards. Yak-Service Flight 9633 where an entire hockey team and others perished. Also the only two supersonic passenger planes ever to fly, the Soviet Tupolev 144 and the Anglo-French Concorde both crashed in Paris France and are surely worth doing. Thank you for the wonderfully informative videos and please keep making them.
starburdi doy Negative, ATCs give taxi clearances stating that they MUST hold short of the runway and contact tower to cross a runway, then go back to ground for further taxi clearance
starburdi doy They can't do anything to stop the 777, they can't contact the ATC, the only thing the 747 crew could do is a go-around. Do you know aviation rules?
Great video but who goofed, the FedEx pilot or the ground controller? Audio would be helpful as planes are put on hold by ground control before the crossing of runways when traffic is landing. See and be seen is old technology on the ground.
People complaining about this channel did not have much source. I suggest you watch all of his video. Not all provided will necessary source bc he cannot make it up. I could understand he tried his best and put a lot of work. He can be sue if he made up inaccurate information. Why not you guys make your own video and let us watch. Lmao
Compared with your previous videos this was very disappointing. Where was the usual info? Nothing about the crews and their flight records, where had the 747 departed from, where was the 777 bound for? Etc. How many passengers and crew on the 747? Your previous videos always gave us these details. Surely there was a major enquiry into this incident with heads rolling somewhere. Pilot error? ATC at fault? We just aren't told.
I think it's not a bad thing if the video length is short. Perhaps, by removing unnecessary things like trying flight controls, writing flight data etc
Your simulations are great! I would like to ask you where do you get the flight data, like the speed, altitude, radio and cabin talk for the reconstruction of the events. This video is made after a real event or just fiction?
There's a lot boring detail at the beginning. Just because it looks realistic doesn't mean it adds to the incident. My suggestion - do an edit for superfluous detail that doesn't need to be shown to explain the story.
Hope you liked the video! Oh and... suggest me some different scenarios (that is not a simple A to B flight) to recreate in one of my next videos. Thanks for all the support! :)
TheFlightChannel hi
Use the crosswind runway at some point
Do nose gear fail
TheFlightChannel you need to do a midair collision ,that would be cool 😎👍
Qiang Chen that would be cool
It would also be cool if they all collapsed
I'm a former courseware developer at FlightSafety International. Your videos are superb, better than anything we had at FSI during my time there.
11:10 the fedex driver forgot to look both ways before crossing teh street
Karman Bassi kek
Not driver it's pilot in planes
Rezzie Libiran It’s a joke
@@luckarm5481 i got notified by you saying dumbass to me
@@luckarm5481 your rude!!!!!
Decent video if too long, but where's the traffic control audio? We get no idea of communication between flight crews and controllers that would have made this much more interesting.
Way too long, monotonous, and without the usual audio. Boring as can be.
@@shafferfox Cheesy text gimmickry too
notvalidcharacters what do you mean that’s the usual font I see on his videos that’s not cheesy
Btw this is probably his own scenario, so do you expect real stuff ALL the time?
@@sirankleknocker3122 Is this a trick question? Why would I NOT expect real stuff?
Can you remake this video? With communication messages between flights and ATC?
MU6 - MusiX its not a real flight
@@6z0 Yet it was. It really happened in Barcelona airport. You can find it out in youtube ua-cam.com/video/DL83eT_CNC8/v-deo.html , but the airplanes are other Utair and Skyteam.
@@marconcio its not lmao
@@marconcio The 2 planes in that clip are an A340 and 767, and this channel would have definitely used the correct planes. This is just for fun.
@@liamhosking2947 i need their numbers
Great job to that British Airways pilot!!
Amen!!
IMAGINARY pilot.
I really like this channel, also when "everyone survives" but could this have been done in a 3 minute summary.
Also, it was ATC missing communications and CVR which is part of the interest, even when nothing happens.
This was not a real incident
@@sevenrubberducks5450 it was
@@jaydensteyn1359 no
@@NotTheRambo Yes. On July 5th 2014, between flight AR-1163, and Aerolineas Argentinas Airbus A340-300, which was taxiing, and flight UT-5187, a UTAir Boeing 767-300 that tried to land.
See ua-cam.com/video/1N5THRSp4hM/v-deo.html
Nice graphics man but you need ATC! And more descriptions about what happened
THIS IS MADE UP
Big Chungus Only took you a year to tell him.
I didn’t watch this video exactly when it came out. I just subbed.
Absolutely. Need more real time info.
there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
0:17 that looks sooooo real!
Would have loved to hear the conversation between the pilots and the ATC, even though it probably would need to be censored!
This is just a flight simulator not a real life one
@sazzlepop Exactly, and she/he is saying if it was real she/he would love to hear the atc conversation
@@dominicindoubt , A lot of people thought it was a recreation of a real incident. Read the comments. That's what we are used to seeing here. If we're going to fake a video then why not fate some atc conversation to go with it. And it's "he".
there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
@chris p. Bacon he dosent need to do anything he just wants to show people amazing graphics
That THUMBNAIL Awwww I love PANDAS!
Your videos are excellent... but this one not so much...
This never actually happened. It’s their own scenario
I think it was just fine as always!!
The 777 is such a beautiful aircraft
+Sebastian Arnillas Agree!!
Sebastian Arnillas Boeing 777 is also my fav plane beautiful and great dreamliner and it is a nice hotel at the sky!
TheFlightChannel i like this super dream video! It great i give 1,000,000,000,000,000 likes!
TheFlightChannel ♥️! RezzieLibiran♥️👍🛫➡️ TheFlightChannel
787 is better and the best
The panda was almost extinct
Panda's are making a come back due to breeding programs! China and the USA have an agreement. Any panda cubs born in the USA must return back to China when the panda turns 4 years old! And yes, they are shipped back on the Panda Express! In 2023 the contract will end with China/USA! All Pandas in the USA will be shipped back to China! That's gonna be a lot of Panda Express flights! It's actually gonna be great to see them go home! The pilots of those flights BETTER NOT make any stupid mistakes!
Everything you put out is AWESOME. Keep them rolling out. Thanks for the time/effort you put in to all the videos. 👍
Never realized how much horsepower those airport tow vehicles must have to overcome the force of the pilot starting jet engines during push back.
Very minor point but in your description you say "near collision between two aircrafts..."
It's perfectly acceptable to use the singular form of "aircraft" even if multiples are described.
Just like the word 'deer' is both singular & plural - if several we still say 'deer' not "deers".
Make sense ?
I know English has a LOT of unspoken rules that are hard to grasp - just trying to be helpful.
Really love all your Aviation recreations, TFC !
Well, also it's a 'near hit' not a 'near miss.'
Nitpicking. Yikes.
Mother Goose - I feel I must correct you. It is not "perfectly acceptable to use the singular form of 'aircraft'." It is actually wrong not to. Single or multiple, it is always aircraft. Just trying to be helpful.
@@paula200 Correct, aircraft is a countable noun, so no "s."
You have too much time on your hands.
I watched this why ? Zero information about anything
john douglas ITS THEIR OWN SCENARIO ITS NOT REAL
an utterly pointless video
@@vojta4045 no, not a hate comment at all, its a video of an incident that never happened! might as well watch the simpsons, in fact I will from now on
dutchy777 You still watched the video.
@@dutchy777 , Yep. I thought it was a real recreation too and I took a lot of shit for my comment. Simpsons sound good.
Not my favourite of yours, really quite boring ☹️
It’s MADE UP
@@PolaryMP No, it isn't.
@@PolaryMP there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
These videos are just superb. Learned more from them about flight incidents than almost anywhere else.
But this one is made up.
I wish infinite flight looked like this
riley bertoia true
Too bad aero fly graphics look better
Joel Haye Have you seen the latest update? The graphics are way better
riley bertoia it’s P3D, Xplane looks way better in my opinion
riley bertoia evgcc
The best airplane accident videos come to you from TFC, in tandem with UA-cam. 🛬✈️♥️♥️♥️♥️🙏🙏🙏🙏
The Flight Channel is The Right Channel.
This video is a fiction, but it models closely to a real near miss at Barcelona airport in 2014.
I believe it involved a Boeing 767 from Russian airline Utair, and an Airbus A340 flown by Aerolineas Argentinas. The Boeing was landing and the Airbus taxied across its path.
Needs to add communications because without them were clueless and it's no where near the dramatic it needs but good job on the simulating
there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
I really love ALL of your videos. The graphics and details are spectacular! Really well done!
UA-cam and The Flight Channel. What a beautiful combination! ✈️🛫😊☺️
For everyone who is confused,
This was a play time, a fake roleplay. (I think)
So DON'T ASK FOR ATC, PILOT COMMUNICATION, OR ANYTHING ELSE.
I'm pretty sure British Airways don't even fly the 747 to Barcelona. It would only be a two hour flight from any UK city.
there is a UA-cam video of a near miss with ATC at Barcelona on youtube. It involved a B767 and an Airbus 340 and happened in 2014. Just search for "near miss Barcelona".
I can't help but imagine what it'd be like in the cockpit of the FedEx jet; which would be more entertaining: them not realizing just how close they came to disaster, or them seeing the incoming plane and thinking "no rain, no snow, no landing craft will stop this delivery!" and just went on ahead. I'm sure there's more to it than that (ATC neglecting to give clearance, etc), but that's the scenario in my head. Nice video!
Always do a excellent job to me. Love this channel so much!! Alot of 2ork goes into each one..thankyou so much. Loyal viewer!!
I do not understand the confusion with people asking this to be remade with more details.
All these videos start with "This is a true story based on official reports and eyewitness accounts" - except this one, because it's not a simulation of any real flight, even though I'm sure its happened before.
Further, the lack of any flight numbers or ATC communication or detail on the pilots furthers this point.
It is simply a scenario.
"I've got a number for you to call."
Harrison Ford has that number on speed dial.
Imagine the countless lives that would've been lost! :O
THIS IS THE BEST REALISTIC VIDEO EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE I WISH I HELPED YOU
I used to work for an airline. Did ticket counter, gate, and ramp. Wing-walking scared the shit out of me at first cause I used to think I'd get sucked into the engines. Those things are no joke when they start up. But I loved the ramp. And interacting with the pilots. Never was a problem while I was there, I'm from Boston, so I worked at Boston-Logan International Airport. It was a great experience. My worst experience was helping put a dead body on the plane. I think it was military. Now that was sad. But I'd also say flying for free wasn't a bad perk of the job. 😉✈💺.
A very good video. Thank you, UA-cam and The Flight Channel!
yup, this video was a very Close call... almost crash... Fedex pilots needs to look both ways 👍😱 Congrats pilots ...great job there👍😱
Fedex was cleared by the tower to taxi there. It clearly was not Fedex's fault which this amateur video should have said.
Man I'm glad you stopped using those transitions, they give me a headache! Fantastic video, always sooo well done. Thank you!
That 777 got the big middle finger from the 747 Crew. LOL
Love the vid and the effort you put into these videos
Not that these are not great also, but Wow, I can realky tell you've come along way in past 2 years, creating these videos! The ones you do now are just so massively, ultra realistic! Great work as always! One of my very fav YT channels!
The FedEx pilot will need a new job...
Why? ATC could be wrong also
You need to look both sides before crossing the runway...
Junior Jr. ATC needs to give clearance when there is no plane landing
Yes but it is the duty of the pilot to check just in case :-D
Simu Trains That means both were wrong
An Utair Boeing 767-300 (VQ-BSX) incoming from Moscow as UT5187 and Aerolíneas Argentinas Airbus A340-300 (LV-FPV) were involved into what could be the bigger disaster of Barcelona Airport.
'The Utair 767 was about to land on Runway 02 while the Argentinas was crossing the runway.
'By the time russian pilots sight Argentinas (they were taxiing to Holding point of RW25R for take-off) on runway while they were on final approach, they did their best making an impressive and close go around.
'After that incidence the plane landed safely on runway 02, and the Argentinas took-off heading Buenos Aires.' [sic]
Very great perspective of this aircraft well done!
Absolutely no point in making the video a whole 16 minutes long
It's for people who are actually interested and not some hater in the comments section. Get out
Delta Alfa 777 was Negligent depressing the cruse control hi beam switch resulting from texting girl friend . ALL PASSENGERS SURVIVE
Man excellent work bro. the detail is amazing and i am addicted to all of your videos. ha Really cool stuff.
I am now addicted to your channel 🤩
How lucky that the pilot of the landing plane "one world" was alert or this was a disaster! It should NOT happen. What is the control tower for? .There are human lives involved with such risks !!!
Boeing-777F+FedEx=beautiful airplane
You nailed it this time also
What the hell where the people in the airport tower thinkin' !?
Good job dude you can be a real pilot by this game and wish you the best dude and have a good day
you should do a go around to an alternate airport with one engine. great vid always looking foreward to fridays:)
11:34 that roar was awesome!
And also 11:50!
Fabulosas imágenes !..Gracias por el video !.
You are always the best! As always, I loved this video! It was sooo cool!!! I love your channel!
SmartMob Thank you so much man!!
TheFlightChannel No problem!
SmartMob was fgj
I love the beginning where the door kinda has a design fail and the panda's nose comes off I was dying
Excellent video. Great work. Well done.
In the US at least current FAA regulations demand that crew check in with tower on every runway entry/crossing and confirm clearance up to the minute. Unless up-to-date clearance is issued near the runway entry sign (usually clearly marked with a huge red background) the crew must stop and wait for clearance. (this rule was a result of multiple disasters worldwide where such runway incursions led to a collision)
I would love to see the transcript of tower communications during this incident.
It is too long compared to average 10 minutes of other videos of this type, great animation and video, but audio would give LIFE to it.
It seems to me that ATC's are given way to many planes under their charge. They literally have the most crucial jobs in ensuring everyone's safety, and there are just too many near misses everyday.
Hey to those saying that it was FedEx’s fault. It might not be, but the ATC’s fault.
Some1 commented on UA-cam and I quote " when pilot makes the mistake ,pilot dies. ... and she ATC Makes mistakes .... pilot dies...."
That 777 fight crew were totally ignorant of the havoc almost wrought by their runway incursion caused by a total inattention to detail. That 747 Crew took little time with initiating power up and immediate go-around! Whew!
I am such a huge fan of your channel! ❤️❤️❤️
Why the near miss and go around always happens in Barcelona?
Same thing with the 767 and a340
Let me guess, it was el classico so atc was watching Barcelona vs Real Madrid, lol
Probably because like most Spaniards none of the ATCs in Spain know good English or speak it in a comprehensible manner!
It is the same one he's simulated. He just changed the planes and the names. Other youtube videos use ATC recordings..
Why not do a few Soviet/Russian incidents. Bashkirian Airlines Flight 2937 & DHL Flight 611 was an extremely tragic mid-air collision. More so given the fate of the air-traffic controller afterwards. Yak-Service Flight 9633 where an entire hockey team and others perished. Also the only two supersonic passenger planes ever to fly, the Soviet Tupolev 144 and the Anglo-French Concorde both crashed in Paris France and are surely worth doing. Thank you for the wonderfully informative videos and please keep making them.
Thank God the other pilot was paying attention.
Glad no one was hurt 👍
Someone will get fired...
The FedEx pilot, he didn't stop
Lucas Silva atc fault
starburdi doy Negative, ATCs give taxi clearances stating that they MUST hold short of the runway and contact tower to cross a runway, then go back to ground for further taxi clearance
Rocket Men60 B747 fault
starburdi doy They can't do anything to stop the 777, they can't contact the ATC, the only thing the 747 crew could do is a go-around. Do you know aviation rules?
Nice video like always!
Ignorant Tuber Thanks man!!
Can you make a flight from ENTO one time?(Do you have discord?)
Most pilots are geniuses. No wonder, then, that they are very well paid.
this is made up....
Would have loved to hear ground for this one. Also, "Hey Fed-ex, before you leave, call the tower."
Great video but who goofed, the FedEx pilot or the ground controller?
Audio would be helpful as planes are put on hold by ground control before the crossing of runways when traffic is landing.
See and be seen is old technology on the ground.
Stan Long this event didn’t happen....
Tom Hanks and Wilson barely got out alive!
Wilson died! lol
I love your channel babe cause I love planes
I think what's meant to happen usually just happens. Thank God for the near miss. I still miss flying in these Covid-19 times
Awesome video 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏! You commander!
This video was very interesting to watch.I loved how it was made😀
Christoffer Eilsertsen Thanks man!
It's very beautiful amazing realisme you are a very very good youtubeur continue
It would be nice to see/hear this somehow merged in with the airport chatter involved!
Becky Schmidt this isn’t a real event that happened
You are always the best
Fed Ex always been crazy either driving or flying!!
I know right. They can't find my house either.
So I guess the ATC went on break ? There’s no communication from pilots either! That’s crazy
As someone who flew when i was 4, and they had a smoking section in the back of a 727, love watching your channel.
What flight simulator is this? THIS IS SO COOL
This was your best video yet! 🥴
People complaining about this channel did not have much source. I suggest you watch all of his video. Not all provided will necessary source bc he cannot make it up. I could understand he tried his best and put a lot of work. He can be sue if he made up inaccurate information. Why not you guys make your own video and let us watch. Lmao
can u imagine instead of the automation saying terrain... pull up, plane.. pull up, plane lol
Compared with your previous videos this was very disappointing. Where was the usual info? Nothing about the crews and their flight records, where had the 747 departed from, where was the 777 bound for? Etc. How many passengers and crew on the 747? Your previous videos always gave us these details. Surely there was a major enquiry into this incident with heads rolling somewhere. Pilot error? ATC at fault? We just aren't told.
Good thing the panda survived. :)
AWESOME VIDEO!!!
I think it's not a bad thing if the video length is short. Perhaps, by removing unnecessary things like trying flight controls, writing flight data etc
I'm glad I have my bike to travel around 🏍️ 🏍️
i prefer the videos where you have music in
JNLN crashes, miss
11:43 omg that attack angle
Your simulations are great!
I would like to ask you where do you get the flight data, like the speed, altitude, radio and cabin talk for the reconstruction of the events.
This video is made after a real event or just fiction?
Thanx God the pilot was not sleeping otherwise ATC had collided two planes.
There's a lot boring detail at the beginning. Just because it looks realistic doesn't mean it adds to the incident. My suggestion - do an edit for superfluous detail that doesn't need to be shown to explain the story.