(Sorry for bad grammar English is not my first language) A lot of cards gotta go if they wanna unban it just mainly to avoid ftks But honestly I do wish they bring it back, I'm a huge pendulum fan and I was excited when I see metalfoes support because u expected electrumite will comeback but I was wrong Good video btw keep up with the good work
Limited to 1 is probably the best for SKDSV. I mean, if you're truly going to get Z-Arc out. Starving Vemon isn't gonna stay on the field for more than a few seconds, better that way than trying to top Deck Purple Poison in the real world for the Fusion Summon 🤷🏻♂️
hardly fair ot punish an unrelated deck because of a cursed mechanic of more popular decks when its eaiser ot lock the offending card effect ot their own archtypes.
@@yusheitslv100 Verte has no business being generic as its existence effectively limits the design space for fusion support. Same with Halq that limited the design space for tuners. the issue with nightingale is that by not requiring its effect to interact with its deck, its effect gets abused, hence making it impossible ot have a fair " copy effect from GY" card. Banning it would be punishing the deck for no reason(even if they dont use it in their primary choice) when an errate that properly shields its effect would suffice.
0:51 punishing an unrelated eck for the sins of a mechanic of a power card is silly. Effect copying from the GY should have never been a thing to begin with., these cards cna only exist safely in the game if their effects are locked into their archtypes
I feel they could have just printed it with a HOPT erata in AGOV all would have been fine
Nightingale is too good. I wouldn't be surprised if they banned it if they bring back Starving Venom
They should give nightingale a hard once per turn since or errata that wouldn’t allow for the ftk if starving venom comes back
I think all this pendulum cards can come back. Pendulums are really Bad nowadays and that would help the deck a little
what anime and character were the lyrilusc cards from? I dont remember seeing them. maybe arc v and I just dont remember them???
(Sorry for bad grammar English is not my first language)
A lot of cards gotta go if they wanna unban it just mainly to avoid ftks
But honestly I do wish they bring it back, I'm a huge pendulum fan and I was excited when I see metalfoes support because u expected electrumite will comeback but I was wrong
Good video btw keep up with the good work
Limited to 1 is probably the best for SKDSV. I mean, if you're truly going to get Z-Arc out. Starving Vemon isn't gonna stay on the field for more than a few seconds, better that way than trying to top Deck Purple Poison in the real world for the Fusion Summon 🤷🏻♂️
I think they can just errata it , opponent doesn't get any damage for the rest of the turn for example
doesn't that contradict it's piercing effect then
@@janithernest3929 first attack then use it's effect, rest of the turn covers the ftk otk potential
@@YohananYGO I still think that’s bad errata a better one is just only allowed to use the opponents grave
@@janithernest3929 but why
@@YohananYGO cause it would fall in line with the anime and how they used it, and avoid ppl using their own cards for FTKs or degenerate bs
FTKs have been bad for a long time and an old FTK isn't going to change how good they are
Just look at the Morphtronic stuff
Tyrant neptune is a meme
Ban Independent Nightingale, and SKD Starving Venom and The Tyrant Neptune can come back.
hardly fair ot punish an unrelated deck because of a cursed mechanic of more popular decks when its eaiser ot lock the offending card effect ot their own archtypes.
@Teixas666 I dont see the issue, since lyrillusc never used independent nightengale.
Same with Verte and Predaplant.
@@yusheitslv100 Verte has no business being generic as its existence effectively limits the design space for fusion support. Same with Halq that limited the design space for tuners.
the issue with nightingale is that by not requiring its effect to interact with its deck, its effect gets abused, hence making it impossible ot have a fair " copy effect from GY" card. Banning it would be punishing the deck for no reason(even if they dont use it in their primary choice) when an errate that properly shields its effect would suffice.
Idk i feel like with Konami making new overpowered cards i just think it lil risky because it would limited card design to an extent
0:51 punishing an unrelated eck for the sins of a mechanic of a power card is silly.
Effect copying from the GY should have never been a thing to begin with., these cards cna only exist safely in the game if their effects are locked into their archtypes
no