SpaceX launches first Starlink batch of 2022, nails booster landing
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 січ 2022
- SpaceX launched 49 new Starlink satellites from Pad 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Jan. 6, 2022. The first stage of the Falcon 9 rocket landed on the "A Shortfall of Gravitas" drone ship minutes later in the Atlantic Ocean. Full Story: www.space.com/spacex-starlink...
Credit: SpaceX - Наука та технологія
This has gone from a science into an art.
it's always been an art, the art of deception
It's art alright, CGI man, look closely, this is a movie
@@codedecode878
Flat earthen?
@@eyestoseefe7618
Flat earthen?
@@aaroncarr-mackay2457 Pseudo Sciencen?
2022 is going to be a very fun year for us who are rocket enthusiasts and space nerds, we're not going to be deprived of launches unlike that long era after the space shuttle program was shut down
Well that wouldn't have happened if the US had decided to continue to fly the deadliest space craft ever launched. I doubt it would have taken much for it to kill another 7 people.
@@johnrauner2515 I wish the shuttle was researched and developed more over the years. It was wise to shut it down. Thank god for spacex
To the moon!....soon.
@@MikeNapoli1989 What does SpaceX have to do with the shuttle? The Russians have been doing what SpaceX just started doing…. Launching capsules. Bloody fanboys…
@@Chimera_Photography because Obama had faith in musk and it sure paid off. Spacex launched astronauts from American 🇺🇸 soil and the last time before was in 2011 when the shuttle program ended.
Just so Amazing the progress I've seen in my lifetime .Since watching the Astronauts go to the Moon. I never thought going into space would become a regular thing. I'm blown away Thank You SpaceX
I can't imagine the immense amount of work that has created a project like this! Well done. I'm privileged to view.
This never gets old....
Nailed it again. If only our gubment could run so efficiently……
There’s some “leaking” for lack of a better description , on the second stage just above the upper portion of the bell with material “dripping” or dropping down onto the propellant ring that runs around the upper bell. I’ve never noticed before, perhaps just the angle of the sun. Easily seen around the 5 min mark of the flight. Anybody noticed this before..?
It's not leakage. The image of the camera is being distorted by the vibrations and rolling shutter effect. You do see a plume , that is the exhaust of the preburner which drives the fuel and oxidizer pump.
Watching the nasaspaceflight video of this launch, they were talking about that, those are just ice chunks coming off from the cooling system it's normal to see a few chunks of ice just break off like that
What was that that sped up vertically through the video at 6:51?
Incredible
Yes we've come a long way
Amazing footage
Interesting how they're calling these rockets "vehicles" nowadays.
Next they'll be receiving speeding tickets for flying through the atmosphere at an unreasonable speed
congratulation space x
What that image that appears bottom left at 5:20 right before they switch to a different camera? 🤔
1st stage separation segment
카메라좀 고화질로 바꿔줘!
Go go go go gone!!!!!
Good , good , nice !!!
We have clapping!!!
We are getting much better!
Nice voice! Thank you!
I love the incredibleness of the times we're living in, right now...💪🏾🌎🤙🏾
#SpaceX
SpaceX Falcon 9 rockets, amazing.
This must be one of the cheapest F9 mission -- 1st stage reused, both fairing reused! Man if only it was possible to reuse the 2nd stage
And if the shuttle was still flying NASA would happily be continuing to use 40 year old technology including solid rockets and having to tow their cores back by boat.
Go SpaceX StarShip 👍👍👍👍
look at left side at screen top, u should see a something parts is moving (or etc) , 5:37 and 6:51
I see lots of particles coming from the engine
5:22 whats this objek
Ms How long you take to get about 100 toneladas of HV on the moon ⚡
Well done!!
Why? These satellites have already ruined my stargazing as they pass right over my house. I have read many complaints from astronomers as well. I really want to know why you and so many other people apparently think this is a good thing?
Because it will boost the ability for space craft and also aircraft to communicate via Starlink satellites, you will be able to have a connection from anywhere in the world, and as well as the funds from his service will pave the way for more starship development. I do agree however that there should be a way to do so and not affect the star visibility from the ground, as I also like astronomy.
What was that at appeared at 5:22 on the bottom left of the left view?
Cloud
@@imgodlywide7187 It's a circle. Clouds don't form that way and that high up too.
separation segment of the F9
@@KSeet then we Paint talkin bout the same thing cuz what i see isnt a circle
@@imgodlywide7187 OK!
What would Kim Jong Un think of Elom for launching more rockets than he ever would?
Who effin cares about what that little Kimchi grease-ball thinks!?
He can only watch and drool.
Damn this is so great!
5:22 min left image, left lower part, is that an ufo? :) If not then why did they change the image quickly? Just wondering.
Thats a part of the 1st stages decoupling segment that floated along with the booster
It's ice falling off
I've asked this before ..why can't we see the booster landing from a ship away from the platform ?? The pictures are always distorted .. so why not have a way of recording the landing from a distance away from the platform.
I think they’re working on another solution, this landing feed didn’t cut out like most of the others
Because then you'd need two vessels instead of one for each landing? It's not worth it just to calm some skeptics.
Hey SpaceX put a little automated drone with Starlink on the droid landing ship that will take off a little distance prior to touchdown to record some awesome footage.
@@joshuasmith1981 Im not a skeptic..I love watching all this stuff .. its amazing...just once..let us see a proper landing without the signal breaking up
@@Mudye it was better..but it still broke up at the end
Did anyone notice that at 5:21 there is a ring shaped object at the lower left corner
SpaceX should spend some $ fixing/updating their landing video equipment.
Nothing wrong with video equipment. Video is streamed in near realtime and wireless transmission becomes difficult when the landing ship is enveloped in the rocket's exhaust plume. SpaceX no doubt has digital recording equipment on board tho, would be nice if they posted uninterrupted landing clips.
there is no motivation to do that - they need that built-in excuse to fool all of the gullible space nerd chumps that think those videos actually "lose signal" LMAO. as if a supposed space agency doesn't know how to use a gimbal
Making look easy space x! God Speed!
Cheering for the first successful landing compare it to now. Kinda hurts me.
Super! Super! Super! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
and just think, Technology is just being touched. 20 years from now, who knows
So this is where my care packages come from.
Hey guys can anyone plz tell me what the object is that appears secs after 5:20? Its to the left of the left gridfin. Its circular and comes into the light giving off a glare. Im not sure what it can be
same i saw it too, now wondering what was it.
a portal maybe lol
@@johnmichaelymascasimpan9853 thats a little far fetched even for me lol.
RCS (reaction control system).
Its commonly used on spacecraft
🙏💚🌹
Still really poor landing cameras. Can't tell if it really landed or if it is just a photo op.
@jae kim uh fuck no they dont. Their camera have nothing to do with this, the vibration caused by the rocket Mess up the radio signal to the satellite from livestream making the signal cut
@jae kim Even the most expensive camera will have a problem due to vibration coming from the rocket, not to mention losing communication thanks to that
If cameras have problems with vibrations on landing then why don't they have problems with vibrations throughout the launch?
@@johnruckman2320 There's a different between camera placed near a rocket with a camera on the rocket. The vibration is stronger near the rocket due to the engine firing
HI FROM U.K XXXXXX
Engineering and Ballet combined
i really really really don't understand why a multi multi-million dollar space organization can not find a way to have awsome video footage of their booster rocket landing... this is the coolest thing in the world to see and you all are really screwing this up... no other country does this landing thing and you guys seem to nail it every time but the footage is unusable... you have the tecnology of landing a booster rocked but you don't have the technology to film it in a way that we can see it... come on... i don't believe the excuses...
I believed they are hiding a TRADE secret that competitors could not copy...
🍾🥂
Now I want y’all to tell me what I jus witness on the bottom left hand corner of the screen and don’t say it’s a satellite 5:22
You’d think they could afford a better camera
Anyone ever wondered why they never show videos of space at all
Huh? You’re commenting underneath a video of space.
@@JohnHazenhousen why does the feed cut off all the time then on every single launch and the world governments made it illegal to video space
🤦♂️
Get a drone in the sky for an aerial pov....
Fing love Elon and SpaceX. Congrats guys
Does space own friction 😏
no but yo mama does!
"Does space own friction"? What does that even mean?
remember 21-6- throw stiks and stones and call me bad names. but much wore jump from a burning building. really the facts
You do have to wonder about the level of intelligence that would have somebody think they needed to explain how the booster gets soot on it
You're talking about government employees, right? Or newscasters.
Solid fuel like the two from shuttles just bigger. This is the mars problem LANDING ON MARS safetly. Nice
Solid fuel? On falcon 9? I'm pretty sure it runs on kerolox so it definitely runs on liquid fuel.
What he said^
A Mars landing with the aerodynamic flaps to slow down, then fire retrograde checks out in the simulations, and computer tests, but there are other variables as well. We’ll just have to wait and see until they test it out or find sufficient evidence to change design.
The Falcon 9 is 100% not a solid-fuel vehicle. What are you on about?
At 5:20 the left screen under the left grid fin you'll see the millennium falcon appear! ALERT: LUKE SKYWALKER AND THE REST HAS FOUND US!!!
I so enjoy watching the booster landings, it's the closest thing to my childhood memories of what space exploration would be - ONLY why is the video always so, so crappy???
White UFO @ 6:51
Ok Elon…. Clearly we all want better views of the first stage landing. Easy challenge ….. right???
Please come inside in the Philippines, I'm begging you elon musk, because internet here is do fkn slow😭😭😭🥺🥺🥺🥺
Starlink will not improve your connections....
@@teceffect9826 I want to subscribe to starlink because this have better mbps
Wait tell all these little bad boys come crashing back to earth, we won't need to wait for an asteroid catastrophic! We're making our own demise.
Why don't we ever see any one of the thousands of satellites? Surely, we would have seen one by now right? 🤫🤔
You can easily see them if you could track them down.
Go into the night sky and track some satellite, for example the ISS. There's many app that track them down
If you're lucky, it might pass in your country, and you can see it, its ussualy going to be like a star moving very fast.
There are thousands of airplane on the sky, but why i only see one or two of them? 🤫🤔
@@yukiko_5051 great counterargument lol. But you're right. There are thousands of airplane in the sky as we are speaking and we barely see any of them, because they're Meant to be very far away from each other it is nearly impossible to see them like a car In the street. The same with satellite
@@farel9476 Yep, but flat earthers doesn't think that far lol
@@yukiko_5051 they dont "think"
Nice CGI, so easy to fool the masses
Says the engineering ingenuity denier
Hahahahahahhahah
more space garbage, great thanks elon
But it isn’t garbage though
should be renamed, spacex wastes shareholder money in sky
SpaceX is not even a public company, but why do you say is wasting money?
@@Iamrich00 tesla is the banner under which all elons buisness ventures get thier funding from.
@@jebes909090 You're living in 2008 basically. The majority of the few SpaceX shareholders are companies which the company (SpaceX) launches space probes for them (telecommunication companies, launching satellites for television broadcast, satellite phones.) , charges NASA and government for satellites, and ISS Cargo.
in 2021 SpaceX used only 210,000 dollars form tesla (in form of batteries, pistons, etc.). which was not about money, but rather efficiency and time
So no, SpaceX is actually giving profit to it's shareholdings and not only that, but is also making profit for themselves.
Check your facts next time, I'm not wasting my time on someone who don't even know where a company he's hating gets it's money from. Bye
@@Iamrich00 space x IS gettting its money from shareholders. its too bad that youtube are such dicks because they erase all the links i posted, but basically spacex has made about 10 billion dollars in its entire existance and thats not profit, thats gross cash, but its valued at 100 billion dollars because of speculative shareholders.
its the same with EVERY company elon has. telsa for instance is worth 1000 dollars a share but have only ever sold 1.5 million cars in the past 15 years. for contrast GM sold at LEAST 2.2 million cars THIS YEAR, and is worth 61 dollars a share. the outstanding shares are pretty much the same with gm havign about 40% more out , but gm's gross earnings are 3X as much and its gross profit is 2X.
its all smoke and mirrors with elon musk.
Astronomers warn about this being the death of the ground based science because of the light pollution. Same goes for stargazers and amateurs. Still they are being ignored by most of the media and NASA and ESA, which is very interesting. I agree, the satellites pass right over my house and have ruined my stargazing. It seems like most people think the advantages outweigh The tragedy of what we lose. I don’t understand why though.
It only mildly pollutes at dawn or dusk, once in the earths shadow a starlink satellite is invisible
@@Mudye What about radio astronomy?
@@riheg won’t pose any threat
Should we go back to candles so there’s less light pollution. Wanna go back to horse and buggy so noise pollution is lessened for animals. Let’s just not make advancement anymore. We were fine living in caves right. You do realize you’re writing this from a internet connection. Think of all the ten of thousands of processes to make that happen. All the pollution. Mining. Involved in that
Ground based science is so 2020
Yall better copy this video and share it like crazy cause it's going to be deleted. All those ufos. One guy even yelped in shock. I was like shut up. Lol. This is too much for me to handle right now.
Forget your foil hat, eh?
where are the ufos...? i dont see any lmao
@@Mudye look at 5:20 something appears left of the left gridfin secs after
@@hamonuryams6388 yeah ice
We so don’t need those starlink in the sky. Anyone can stop Elon Vaporware musk doing bullshit like that?
You don’t, others do.
why spending Billions for rocket but you can just make earth cleaner
Why spend your time on the internet commenting this instead of helping and working for the sake of a better civilization?
Earth problem is about ethics, society and government, not about some really rich dude doing rockets, **who also is pushing renewable energy to it's limits and new areas BTW.
Fake but cool
Nope, it's real
@@Ethan_Roberts no it’s not
@@bagelthug got evidence to support your stupid claim?
Dang and a flat horizon that high up? I don't think Elon saw this video or had anything to do with the placement of the cameras
*_Good CGI._*
Don't you have a bible to read? Maybe stare at a DVD and comment about how it resembles your flat head
It's just for gamers like you who never get out of moms basement.
@@mrcoffeemate8796*_Which one? Antons or the Holy bs bible?_*
@@danpaulson927 *_I haven't played a video game since I played an arcade game in the 80's. Never got into the video games._*
@@danpaulson927 *_Never lived in a basement and my mom is dead thank you._*
*_FakeX_*
wow so original, whered you get that from
The launches get witnessed by tens of thousands of people, across hundreds of kilometers. The rockets get followed by people with telescopes and binoculars all the way up. And the satellites are visible every clear night, and their heights and groundspeeds can be triangulated using high school trig and a friend a hundred km or so away. And the larger ones get seen, their shapes made out, all the time. It's a worldwide hobby, with many thousands of us doing this stuff every day.
There are SpaceX launches with land pad landings scheduled for this year IIRC, so you could just go to one with a telescope and track the booster out and back.
"Very, very expert"
Mark "The toolbag" Sargeant