The original plan of the Jurong Region Line

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 83

  • @coolman444
    @coolman444 Рік тому +5

    a Nostalgic music (Bird Creek - Hall Of Mirrors)
    BTW nive video. Im surprised that your now uploading videos regularly

  • @matiasscr3643
    @matiasscr3643 Рік тому +5

    Glad to see the "The forgotten plans of the -" series revive! Do one about the original plans of the DTL.

  • @ltankk
    @ltankk Рік тому +16

    JRL is still considered a LRT even though it may be given a MRT label. The alignment of the network itself and the proposed service patterns all are LRT-like, even down to the rolling stock. It is considered a light metro at best.
    Whereas BPLRT and SPLRT which we call "LRTs" are actually APMs. These act as feeder services to the towns they are serving.

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому +1

      if the BPLRT and SPLRT are APMs, is skytrain counted as LRT?

    • @ltankk
      @ltankk Рік тому

      @@coolman444 Skytrain is also APM.

    • @naorierangeenviro500
      @naorierangeenviro500 Рік тому +2

      lta mislabelling moment

    • @syamil9912
      @syamil9912 Рік тому +1

      @@ltankk the new line of that connect JB to Woodlands (that the Malaysian called it an LRT) would be similar in rolling stock width (2.65-2.75m, also applies to the ones in KL like KJ and SP lines) to the Jurong Line. Meanwhile, the MRT lines in KL has a similar rolling stock width to the rolling stock of the other SIngapore MRT lines (3.1-3.2 m)
      At least it is not as bad as Manila, since the nomenclature is actually based on the operator, you would see MRT trains called as LRTs and vice versa.

    • @leoahmadkhanofficial
      @leoahmadkhanofficial 9 місяців тому

      What's SPL

  • @plane4456
    @plane4456 Рік тому +6

    If the JRL was actually LRT, It Would Be Named “Jurong Region LRT”

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому +1

      yah but it didnt happened

  • @nuffaildaniaelle977
    @nuffaildaniaelle977 Рік тому +3

    Jrl currently built to Malaysia LRT specification

  • @BYD4005Z
    @BYD4005Z Рік тому +2

    The routing for the JRL was different also, boon lay was the centre of the 3 branch on the southern and western branch

  • @ratedprogram6947
    @ratedprogram6947 Рік тому +6

    I still think it is a bad idea to build an mrt line that only connects with existing lines. A few years down the road the EWL will be over capacity 💀

    • @garfieldandfriends1
      @garfieldandfriends1 Рік тому

      They should create a DTL branch from Beauty World to Tengah/NTU via Bukit Batok.
      Yes, DTL three cars train is not much, but it’s better than nothing.

  • @electro_sykes
    @electro_sykes Рік тому +2

    Good thing it isn't an LRT, god, holy fuck, those things stink and get way too crowded. Only took Singapore a few decades to learn that, the hard way!

  • @danialabdulhaqjamal
    @danialabdulhaqjamal Рік тому +2

    Some JRL Station will connecting with the HSR

  • @littledrummerboy9080
    @littledrummerboy9080 Рік тому +1

    So happy they are building JR Line in Singapore, hope to use my SUICA card soon.

  • @FakeHaqimy
    @FakeHaqimy 6 місяців тому +4

    I think JRL should be underground since it would technically be easier to build and prevent the problem of what BPLRT has of being too close to HDB Flats.

    • @mrfoxesite6982
      @mrfoxesite6982 4 місяці тому +1

      both too but like it should be togther. elevatedstn1, understn2. it shouldnt change all the time like ewl only one part should be one like that.

  • @Service861
    @Service861 10 місяців тому +1

    You should have your 4th lrt line video! I watch the video, but then only 3 lrt lines operated in Singapore!

  • @svc945bsoe
    @svc945bsoe 9 місяців тому +1

    smrt: CR151 will operate on JRL
    R151: alright
    smrt: no not R151 i said CR151
    R151: eh? nani?
    me: *brain overload*

  • @electro_sykes
    @electro_sykes Рік тому +1

    I don't get why this wasn't built as just an LRT line or even a Tramway or Bus Rapid Transit network. would have made more sense for the layout of multiple branches and would have allowed more flexibility, especially if it was BRT, because local bus routes would also be able to use it. LRT would have been better suited for Bahar Junction arrangement, but then again, a Tram would of carried more people than an LRT vehicle and wouldn't suck as much.

  • @bestfriend13721
    @bestfriend13721 Рік тому +1

    I have an suggestion. We should connect or the lrt together. Bp lrt, Ptc lrt, stc lrt, Singapore malaysia lrt, skytrain at Changi Airport aand sentosa morral wheel with a lrt or three lrt.

  • @mightyrainbow1003
    @mightyrainbow1003 Рік тому +2

    Yeah I know that. That was in the 2001 concept but there were no plans for it. In the LTA 2013 Masterplan It is announced as an MRT Line.

  • @indraraharjo654
    @indraraharjo654 Рік тому +1

    add one more station to connect with Downtown Line (1 station terminus after Choa Chu Kang)

  • @Iamconfusing
    @Iamconfusing Рік тому +5

    i legit thought jrl is an lrt line

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому +1

      same but still the same

    • @94Princeking
      @94Princeking Рік тому +2

      I thought too but lta announced to be mrt instead

    • @liewsoonhao4643
      @liewsoonhao4643 7 місяців тому +1

      Technically, it is an LRT, it is just that "LRT" in Singapore refers to APMs, which is misleading

  • @AxelRaffasya
    @AxelRaffasya Рік тому +1

    Lrt is now planned mrt for Jurong region line and Punggol north that he talk about before

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому +1

      he didn't include the Punggol North in the video

    • @AxelRaffasya
      @AxelRaffasya Рік тому +1

      @@coolman444 I said last time video
      Go find yourself if haven’t see the video

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому +1

      @@AxelRaffasya what r u talking about?

  • @leoahmadkhanofficial
    @leoahmadkhanofficial 9 місяців тому

    I cant wait to check it out at the age of 12 :)

  • @sgdemobushunter7394
    @sgdemobushunter7394 Рік тому +1

    1:37 wheres the sengkang punggol lrt line

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому

      well since the this was planned between 1996-2001, he never include SPLRT since they are opened from 2003/2005

  • @tanjunwei172
    @tanjunwei172 Рік тому +2

    Bishan-Tanjong Katong LRT

  • @aehighfmcolinchin
    @aehighfmcolinchin Рік тому +1

    We are still waiting for the West Coast Extension to be finalised

    • @orballz
      @orballz Рік тому

      That would be the extension connecting to Haw Par Villa station as the interchange?

  • @BrandonSKW
    @BrandonSKW 6 місяців тому +1

    Should change punggol lrt to mrt too.

  • @Im_an_SG_Public_Transport_Fan
    @Im_an_SG_Public_Transport_Fan Рік тому +2

    I think LRTs shouldn’t take over the JRL since the line is so long and LRTs are not capable of traveling long distances all at once

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому +1

      oh really? they dont have use fuel though...

  • @stefan_tang
    @stefan_tang Рік тому +2

    Guys what he means by tharman is going to be president is singapore news says that tharman will be voted for president as he had contributed alot to singapore TO LETS WELCOME THARMAN TO BE ANOTHER PRESIDENT OF SINGAPORE AND also i really thought the JRL TRAIN would be a lrt:(

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому +2

      he didn't said that from this video. What r u talking about?

    • @stefan_tang
      @stefan_tang Рік тому

      Just telling

    • @stefan_tang
      @stefan_tang Рік тому +1

      No another person also said that so i was just adding up

  • @Travellers_footage
    @Travellers_footage Рік тому +4

    Tharman is gonna be president :(((( my MP

  • @Service861
    @Service861 10 місяців тому +1

    Jrl should not be the 2nd lrt line since the BPlrt!

  • @bestfriend13721
    @bestfriend13721 Рік тому +1

    That should be newest lrt.

  • @Driftbus.Productions.official
    @Driftbus.Productions.official Рік тому +1

    Looks like Westwood lrt.

  • @nuffaildaniaelle977
    @nuffaildaniaelle977 Рік тому +1

    What?!? A VAL?!?

  • @bestfriend13721
    @bestfriend13721 Рік тому +1

    Cross island line and seletar line should also be lrt

  • @mrnicegamer5582
    @mrnicegamer5582 Рік тому +1

    I actually belived that theres a line called Jurong LRT from a furure mrt map on google, turns out its fake

  • @antant9523
    @antant9523 Рік тому +1

    you could at least show the lrt routing based on the old concept plan and master plan even if they are not 100% accurate

  • @tanjunwei172
    @tanjunwei172 Рік тому +2

    Buona Vista LRT

  • @tanjunwei172
    @tanjunwei172 Рік тому +2

    Yishun LRT

  • @tanjunwei172
    @tanjunwei172 Рік тому +2

    Do Malaysia's

  • @elat8058
    @elat8058 Рік тому +1

    they learned from their mistakes...
    *cue SPLRT/BPLRT*

    • @coolman444
      @coolman444 Рік тому +1

      but, the plan was in 1996. thats way before pblrt and Sengkang/Punggol lrt even exist

  • @ivanlimzg
    @ivanlimzg Рік тому +1

    Ask KBW, he said something about the LRT

  • @bestfriend13721
    @bestfriend13721 Рік тому +1

    No. Sorry. Jrl and cross island line should be mrt then the newest lrt

  • @tanjunwei172
    @tanjunwei172 Рік тому +2

    Bedok LRT

  • @RP-jv8xr
    @RP-jv8xr Рік тому

    Ok so last friday, 2nd June 2023, I successfully took a refurbished C751A for the first time.

  • @bestfriend13721
    @bestfriend13721 Рік тому +1

    Jrl should be lrt

  • @TRULOVE_2H
    @TRULOVE_2H 6 місяців тому

    no its a mrt line