Dragon ogres, Storm's Call and the Quickening Storm: this needs a FAQ/clarification, as the rule was read when the unit suffers hits from Storm's Call, it become Quickened. Does not say suffers wounds and needs another sentence saying that the dragon ogres/shaggoth doesn't take damage. A throwback from the old rule that they became frenzied when hit by lightning...fun with Skaven allies hitting you with a Doomwheel.
Just a correction...Monster slayer do not affect behemoths. The rule states that monster slayer targets units who "troop type" is monster. A Behemoth is troop type Behemoth and is therefore not affected by the Monster slayer rule.
I was excited about starting a fresh beastmen army regardless of prices after playing skaven 15 yea4s ago. Finding out about legacy armies means I give a big middle finger to GW. They aren't getting a dollar.
Who cares. Supported means they will give you pruned army lists so you can pay $80 for two boxes of 1990 sculpts so you can kit bash "venerable core troop". It also means they're gonna screw with your rules, so better pick models you like the look of. All armies got rules. The argument for hating TOW because an army is "unsupported" seems so petty to me. Grab your Forge World only chaos dwarf list and play TOW.
It’s good stuff and I like your videos. I’ve been watching them recently, but you should let your guests and partners talk a bit more and share their opinions. It does feel a little bit like you’re quick to say no or yes or cut them off even if they’re incorrect or maybe you don’t agree at least let them finish their point see what they have to say and don’t jump the gun on them. I’m not saying this because I have some personal vendetta against you or anything like that at all I’m just saying in terms of the flow of the videos and actually getting information from UA-cam it would be a lot clearer if maybe you made like a table of contents first what you wanna talk about and then one person talks then the other person adds onto that . Just an idea still a great video !
These videos would be infinitely more interesting if you showed the miniatures. Sure it would be more work and some people just treat it like a podcast but some of us don't know what you are talking about and showing is always better than telling.
Let's gooooo-ats!
Edit: In a big game, a cockatrice can be an easily deployable terror-causing entity. I think it's not bad in the second line.
The option for a Great Weapon on a Gor champion is a nod to the old metal (1995?) champion sculpt.
Happy for the Beastmen players. Good items.
This is the one we’ve been waiting for! Goat-tastic 🐐🐐🐐
Dragon ogres, Storm's Call and the Quickening Storm: this needs a FAQ/clarification, as the rule was read when the unit suffers hits from Storm's Call, it become Quickened. Does not say suffers wounds and needs another sentence saying that the dragon ogres/shaggoth doesn't take damage.
A throwback from the old rule that they became frenzied when hit by lightning...fun with Skaven allies hitting you with a Doomwheel.
Hype for the Old World!
I have a lot of Beastmen.
Would be great to play them again.
Just a correction...Monster slayer do not affect behemoths. The rule states that monster slayer targets units who "troop type" is monster. A Behemoth is troop type Behemoth and is therefore not affected by the Monster slayer rule.
No your incorrect. read the first paragraph on page 196.
Behemoths are monsters.
I was excited about starting a fresh beastmen army regardless of prices after playing skaven 15 yea4s ago.
Finding out about legacy armies means I give a big middle finger to GW.
They aren't getting a dollar.
There are a lot of good alt sites!
Who cares. Supported means they will give you pruned army lists so you can pay $80 for two boxes of 1990 sculpts so you can kit bash "venerable core troop".
It also means they're gonna screw with your rules, so better pick models you like the look of.
All armies got rules. The argument for hating TOW because an army is "unsupported" seems so petty to me.
Grab your Forge World only chaos dwarf list and play TOW.
From my understanding legacy armies will have the same quality of rules as the ones in the books, but they won't have arcane journals.
@luxosaucer1086 yeah, I said that 😂
You do you, there's a bunch of good rank and flank fantasy games out there with good model support. WAP, KoW and Oathmark are all excellent systems.
interrupt hammer... bro let the man talk.
I would love to see a meme game of an all ambush Beastmen vs an all ambush WE game.
you missed that you can give the Shaggoth a magic shield so it can have a 2+ armor save.
Shaggoth isn't infantry, so cannot take gnarled hide. It can though take the blackened plate for a 2+
Shaggoth can’t take a regular shield, therefore he can’t take a regular shield
Ive never been so excited
Im looking forward to warriors pf chaos. Me and my friends here in Denmark love your content
Does the poison banner affect your ungor's shortbows?
To be able to change between ranked and skirmish formation sounds cool, but I dont think I will bother doing it in the middle of a game😅
Glory to the MOO!
*interrupts 7 times * You're weirdly excited!
Love this channel
FOR ALGORYTHMO! FOR THE STEVE! AND LUGNUT MCGILLGULLY JR!
Razorgore Chariots in TW too
Great Video guys.
Does foe render not work on the additional hand weapon load out?
it does not.
@@MountainMiniatures I did the classic thing where you just read the first paragraph and stop!
Does Blood Rage still trigger if you roll a double but fail the primal fury test? Like if you roll a 12 on 2d6
Afraid not, it's any double so long as you pass the test. So double 1, 2, 3 or 4 for a Beastlord
You guys need to look an Minotaurs again. You skipped a very important special rule called motley crew.
No Herdstone then?
It’s good stuff and I like your videos. I’ve been watching them recently, but you should let your guests and partners talk a bit more and share their opinions. It does feel a little bit like you’re quick to say no or yes or cut them off even if they’re incorrect or maybe you don’t agree at least let them finish their point see what they have to say and don’t jump the gun on them.
I’m not saying this because I have some personal vendetta against you or anything like that at all I’m just saying in terms of the flow of the videos and actually getting information from UA-cam it would be a lot clearer if maybe you made like a table of contents first what you wanna talk about and then one person talks then the other person adds onto that .
Just an idea still a great video !
are dragon ogres part of them now
Yes
These videos would be infinitely more interesting if you showed the miniatures. Sure it would be more work and some people just treat it like a podcast but some of us don't know what you are talking about and showing is always better than telling.
+1
Moooo! Mooo, moo moo. Moo. 🦬🍺