2014 KIA Forte Sedan vs Chevy Cruze Diesel 0-60 MPH Mashup Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лип 2013
  • ( www.TFLcar.com ) The 2014 KIA Forte and the Chevy Cruze are direct competitors in the new car market place...or are they. In another fun and informative TFLcar Mashup Review we compare these two sedans to see which one is the better ride. But while these two cars compete for the same buyer not all Chevy Cruzes are created equal. In fact this Cruze has a surprise under the hood....a very fuel efficient and very torquey turbo-charged diesel engine. With this in mind....do you think that the KIA Forte or the Chevy Cruze is the fastest in a straight line to 60 MPH at a mile above sea level? You'll have to watch this unique TFLcar Mashup to find out.
    Check us out on:
    Facebook: ( / tflcar )
    Twitter: ( / tflcar )
    and now even Truck Videos on UA-cam at:
    The Fast Lane Truck ( / tflcar )
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 306

  • @edmunda4128
    @edmunda4128 10 років тому +38

    Y'know ... all these people bashing on these cars because they have "better" cars ... makes me wonder ... Why the hell are you watching this anyway ?

    • @juliusnixon63
      @juliusnixon63 3 роки тому

      i guess I'm kind of randomly asking but do anybody know a good site to stream newly released tv shows online ?

  • @alexchad1000
    @alexchad1000 10 років тому +3

    KIA FORTE'S: engine -will run at least: 180,000 miles. CHEVY CRUZE'S : engine will run at least : 89,000 miles then major engine problem's arise or transmission problems !

  • @Kyt2024
    @Kyt2024 10 років тому +15

    I get really tired of this whole "fun to drive factor" thing that pops up in so many car reviews. It's certainly a pretty piss poor reason to suggest leasing the Forte instead of buying it. The sad thing is somebody will watch this and actually think they shouldn't buy a Forte now, when there really is no reason to not buy one. It's a very good car.

    • @palebeachbum
      @palebeachbum 9 років тому +4

      To not recommend a vehicle because it doesn't drive like a sports car is idiotic to me if it does other important things quite well.

    • @oreocakester4307
      @oreocakester4307 4 роки тому +1

      @@palebeachbum its not even a sports car, so I don't know why they want it to drive like one

    • @palebeachbum
      @palebeachbum 4 роки тому +1

      @@oreocakester4307 excellent point.

  • @Turbo614
    @Turbo614 11 років тому +2

    That kia is a better car. That cruise blows

  • @TheIronman0000
    @TheIronman0000 10 років тому

    Hey I really love your reviews! I was wandering if you would review the 2014 chevy cruze 6 speed manual? I'm thinking about buying one and I wanted to know if the manual is a little faster than the automatic! Thanks!

  • @uoyuoy444
    @uoyuoy444 10 років тому +7

    If you never drove a Chevy Cruze than you should not comment . I thought it was just another cheap American car NOT SO ! I drove the 2013 LTZ I was shocked at what a fine car it is.

    • @user-vm4bi3uy4w
      @user-vm4bi3uy4w 6 років тому

      uoyuoy444 umm its actually made in Adelaide, Australia

    • @lofiguy8136
      @lofiguy8136 6 років тому

      Hahahaha, Chevy!

    • @bmw803
      @bmw803 5 років тому

      I bought a 2017 last August. Very nice car. But, it has the GM brand. If it was branded as a Toyota or Honda, it would be receiving glory beyond glory. WOW!! WHAT A CAR. GM can make it with gold inside and they'll complain. Sounds like brand brainwashing.

  • @jamesgang94591
    @jamesgang94591 11 років тому

    I remember my 91 Beretta GT 5-speed bought brand new was $12,900 and it had it all except a sunroof. Drove that thing for 9 years and loved it.

  • @MrCADuncan
    @MrCADuncan 11 років тому

    Sweet t-shirt, Nathan!

  • @777Talon
    @777Talon 10 років тому +1

    Hey TFL when are you guys going to do the new 2014 Kia Forte Turbo, Koup or 5?? I think it would be a great match up for the Fiesta ST.

  • @tim1862
    @tim1862 10 років тому

    Hey tfl I watch a lot of your videos a good idea when you do 0-60 runs is show a list of comparable cars with similar 0-60 times at the end, would show were the car really stands in market! Just an idea

  • @toyota420xp
    @toyota420xp 10 років тому +5

    I'd rather have the cruze. I hhhhhhhaaaate the forte style and kinda like the cruze style

  • @LH452
    @LH452 11 років тому

    Can't wait for you guys to get ahold of the SX hatch and koup with the 1.6 liter turbo 4!

  • @firstclassboards6447
    @firstclassboards6447 9 років тому +1

    The cruze is like a blank canvas, it looks pretty normal stock but it can look really cool by making a few inexpensive customizations

  • @RaahimOmer
    @RaahimOmer 11 років тому

    Btw great mashup as always

  • @TFLcar
    @TFLcar  11 років тому

    We fear that's not correct. A turbo can help compensate for the lack of air density but it does not negate the fact that the air has less density when it first enters the engine. While a turbo will force more air into the combustion chamber it will not increase the air density to sea level density.

  • @eleonik76
    @eleonik76 10 років тому +1

    In the last 10 years KIA has brought the quality to a level that competes even with VW and Ford! Not to mention that i see them at the service only for oil-brakes change,despite the streets are flooded with them :) Now..,if you look at short term MPG,Chevy might be better buy,but you should check how much cost modern diesel maintenance like piezo injectors,fuel pumps (2000 bars) and the rest ..,then is the insurance and guarantee from KIA,which is unbeatable :)

  • @mikekoz68
    @mikekoz68 9 років тому +2

    My 2014 goes to 60(100km/h) in 8 seconds flat which is plenty fast for a non-fast car. Best part is the 6 speed trans.....a lot of gears to properly use the torque available. Way better than an ancient 3spd auto lol

  • @nessafaceisawesome
    @nessafaceisawesome 10 років тому

    2014 Toyota corolla or 2014 Chevy cruze?? I currently drive 03 Camry. I need a upgrade

  • @ec6933
    @ec6933 11 років тому

    I just heard from a chevy rep yesterday that the cruze diesel gets 46 highway mpg?....not 36?

  • @DeVron001
    @DeVron001 11 років тому

    One aspect that I would like you guys to put in your reviews, is how noisy it is in the cabins! This is a major concern for me and will impact on my choices, thanks!

  • @psw05250
    @psw05250 10 років тому +5

    I personally like forte style

  • @AndreiDPop
    @AndreiDPop 10 років тому +4

    I strongly recommend you get your fact straight next time. You rated the Diesel as 24mpg city, 36mpg highway. EPA ratings for the Cruze Diesel are 27 city and 46 highway. Nice try. Heck, even the 1.4L Turbo Cruze is rated for 26 city and 38 highway. You took the numbers from the 1.8L Cruze, which has the lowest fuel economy.
    Try again.

  • @Sacapuntas69
    @Sacapuntas69 11 років тому

    I think you have the mpg figures mixed up in the video??? 27/46 for the Kia but it only gets 28 combined?

  • @henryd1981
    @henryd1981 11 років тому

    Yup! They need to edit this video so people aren't confused, as does happen a lot on the internet.

  • @sic22l
    @sic22l 11 років тому

    The biggest issue is that in city driving DPF doesn't have enough time to burn itself (DPF catches and stores particulates and needs to burn them once in about 350-400 miles) properly and that clogs the flow. Your dealer can induce the burn through service computer but sometimes it doesn't help and you have to replace the filter (wchich is quite expensive). But it's not as bad as it sounds, carmakers are working on it for a few years now and it really got better recently.

  • @fakebrake
    @fakebrake 10 років тому +2

    I drive a 2014 forte ex. Great car in my opinion.

  • @alecfox9720
    @alecfox9720 6 років тому

    i love this video

  • @sic22l
    @sic22l 11 років тому

    Modern diesels have many sensors inside that check many parameters and based on them engine controller can modify injection parameters. Even if temperature varies slightly (mostly during winter) the engine never gets cold and incomplete fuel burn is not a problem in modern diesels. DPF clogging during city driving (for more than 400-500 miles in a row) is real issue.

  • @TheSnowsurfer7
    @TheSnowsurfer7 4 місяці тому

    I love Toyotas and they exploded in the US. Did the Toyota RAV usher crossovers or was it the Pontiac Aztec?

  • @sic22l
    @sic22l 11 років тому

    Idling causes slight drop of overall temperature but inside combustion chambers temperature is the same because heat is generated during compression stroke. Maybe Cummins diesels are very delicate, I have a modern Common Rail diesel and temperature drops only slightly and only in winter. I've never heard that idling caused problems in any EU diesel.

  • @mcodnry
    @mcodnry 11 років тому

    What's the 0-60 for those shoes?

  • @CarWhiz22
    @CarWhiz22 11 років тому

    how come you guys had to re-upload?

  • @mattli3670
    @mattli3670 10 років тому

    A little FYI, If you press and hold the traction control button until both lights come, It does change the performance of the car. Hmm Maybe you guys should try it.

  • @jacobyoung574
    @jacobyoung574 11 років тому

    TFL, what is your view/understanding on why the Cruze Turbo Diesel was so slow at one mile above sea level (vs others have clocked it at sub 9 seconds at sea level)? My understanding (although I do not claim any expertise), is that the fact it is a turbo will remove most of the atmospheric pressure dependency for performance.

  • @kylepage64
    @kylepage64 11 років тому

    Gas numbers mixed up?

  • @divisioneight
    @divisioneight 11 років тому

    I lived through Sandy's long gas lines. Folks with diesels laughed at us standing in line for our ration of gas while they filled up. The next ride's a oil burner.

  • @ignacioreyes750
    @ignacioreyes750 4 роки тому

    I have a forte 14 pretty badass for it to be my first car

  • @letsbefreaks98
    @letsbefreaks98 11 років тому

    i have a cruze lt in that same black granite metallic color and i like it but i wish they used just a normal black because i don't like how the black granite metallic looks greyish

  • @Patrick-gh3fq
    @Patrick-gh3fq 10 років тому +6

    The seats in the Kia is PLASTIC! The Cruze is Leather, REAL LEATHER!

    • @anthonybonanni446
      @anthonybonanni446 9 років тому +1

      Christopher St John You're*

    • @EtecGear
      @EtecGear 8 років тому

      +Christopher St John you're**

    • @lofiguy8136
      @lofiguy8136 6 років тому

      Are you seating on your plastic rocking chair while commenting 😂

  • @rcorrea26
    @rcorrea26 11 років тому

    I hope you guys try out the forte koup gdi turbo

  • @9072aaa
    @9072aaa 11 років тому

    seems that very few testers take into consideration that diesel costs more than super premium in some locations. factoring the $ difference will reduce the mpg diesel advantage.

  • @jccoello
    @jccoello 11 років тому

    You guys should do the 0-60 with a new car and an older generation... i've always wanted to know how the civic 98 does... never really could do the test in here cuz there's too much cars everywhere... but anyways just a suggestion, thanks for the videos!

  • @boberson33
    @boberson33 11 років тому

    Those if you who think the diesel dpf is problematic, it's not, I called the dealership, the Cruze automatically regenerates the DPF without notification as long as you drive above 30 mph or 50 km/h for 15 minutes non stop, so don't panic.

  • @1guyin10
    @1guyin10 11 років тому

    They have it backwards in the video. They Cruze is rated for 46 mpg highway, which is 4 mpg better than the competing Jetta TDI.

  • @2022908
    @2022908 6 років тому

    Just bought the 2014 Forte after driving a Cruze! It's waaaayyy better, more loaded too.

  • @MrThat70svan
    @MrThat70svan 11 років тому

    Diesels are just fun to drive, but GUYS, You just shot down my Chevy Cruze Diesel taxi idea when U said there is no back seat room! I guess the Jetta Diesel is the best. Will U be doing a video review of the Mazda 6 diesel?

  • @Veyronp87
    @Veyronp87 11 років тому

    mpg is pretty darn good for the cruze! diesels need to improve in popularity in the US

  • @tonyvelasquez863
    @tonyvelasquez863 10 років тому

    You had the forte on eco mode which throthes the engine good job lol

  • @dylanjuhnke7504
    @dylanjuhnke7504 10 років тому

    They got the mpg numbers mixed around at the beginning

  • @boberson33
    @boberson33 11 років тому

    I have owned a Volkswagen Golf TDI since I was 16, I'm 22 now, and it hasn't had any of those problems, I get 43 MPG in the city, and I have 260K on it.

  • @brooksycc7
    @brooksycc7 11 років тому

    The reason for the higher price is because the car companies let Roman and Nathan drive the top-of-the-line models for each car. And technically, even the base model of these cars are not entry level. Chevy has two cars (Spark and Sonic) that are below the Cruze and Kia has the Soul and the Rio. Those four cars are just above the $13k price point.

  • @rx7guy21
    @rx7guy21 11 років тому

    not only do you have to get used to putting diesel in the cruze, but also DEF which is something the German competition does not need and just adds to the already high cost of diesel

  • @Jr210100
    @Jr210100 11 років тому

    I've driven, owned and repaired several diesel engines with more than 1.5 millions miles. In fact, I have more years of experience with diesel engines than the years of life you've had on this earth. I think you have a long way to go before you can start schooling me.

  • @halopcdraco
    @halopcdraco 11 років тому

    At 1:51 You posted 24 city / 36 highway but in the video all you need to know, you said 27 city / 46 highway for the cruze

  • @yelp1000
    @yelp1000 11 років тому

    Love both of these cars but why not step up to one of the high mpg mid sizers for the same price.

  • @GRAFHC
    @GRAFHC 11 років тому +1

    ?
    I test drove a 2014 Kia Forte just the other day... there's no more plastic in it than any other car on the market. Not to mention, little to no engine noise or rattle.
    Why make such misinformed statements? Biased against foreign cars possibly?

  • @sic22l
    @sic22l 11 років тому

    Yes, Cruse Diesel is rated at 46 mpg hwy. Theoretically you can get close to that in real life. It has similar real world numbers to less powerful but faster Jetta TDI.

  • @eleonik76
    @eleonik76 10 років тому

    Indeed they are in :) I just check them and have to say that i value my life and i go with KIA,since the airbags are much more effective and better positioned than in Chevy! Chevy got its door almost apart from the car body!! Everyone here can check the tests!

  • @jacobyoung574
    @jacobyoung574 11 років тому

    The fact that the Cruze is not undergoing massive styling changes every year is a positive. Part of the reason that Japanese vehicles have been so successful in the past is that the design was on a four year cycle, vs most American cars changed dramatically every year. This is enticing to the buyer because you know that your car will not be out-of-date styling-wise soon, and also this design practise allows the resale value to be much higher..

  • @NathanDAdlen
    @NathanDAdlen 11 років тому

    The EPA rates it at 33 mpg combined (27 mpg city, 46 mpg highway).

  • @brandonfriesen5389
    @brandonfriesen5389 11 років тому

    The DSG is a real winner. The Passat TDI got 9 seconds 0-60 in TFLs' tests and it has the same engine as the Jetta AND its heavier. I'm pretty sure the Jetta would be high 8 seconds if the passat is low 9's.

  • @ryanmajor2
    @ryanmajor2 10 років тому +1

    Now is it worth it to spend more on a diesel cruze over the turbo one? Regular gas is $3.30, premium is around $3.70, diesel is still $4.00. So you are spending more at the pump and for the vehicle just to get a few more mpgs?

    • @contractki11er
      @contractki11er 10 років тому

      Well the diesel gets a few hundred more miles than a gas engine. Let's say an extra 150 mile advantage over a regular gas engine which lets say gets 400 miles a tank. Assuming they go 15,000 miles a year, the diesel will need to fill up about 70% less (27:37) and lets say they both have a 12 gallon tank, in a year the gas engine will rack up $1465 on regular, and the diesel $1296, you saved $169! Hooray!

    • @anthonybonanni446
      @anthonybonanni446 9 років тому +2

      Exactly! Where I live, Diesel averages AT LEAST a full dollar more per gallon, completely negating the MGPs.

    • @palebeachbum
      @palebeachbum 9 років тому

      Anthony Bonanni Yep. The math has already been done by some auto critics. Because the Cruz Diesel costs thousands more than the regular one and diesel fuel costs more, it'd take you something stupid like 100yrs to just break even on cost from buying a Cruz Diesel. It's really dumb. So basically, everyone who buys a Cruz Diesel is going to lose their ass when they sell or trade it in.

    • @anthonybonanni446
      @anthonybonanni446 9 років тому

      Not only that, they can be more expensive in gas! If you get 20% more efficiency with a fuel price increase of around 25%, it is be more expensive to fuel.

  • @sic22l
    @sic22l 11 років тому

    I had (and still have) a car with diesel engine and I've never had such problems. I've never heard of anyone having problems with it and here in Europe over 50% of cars are diesels. I think most people even during city driving don't even get close for "idling too long".

  • @boberson33
    @boberson33 11 років тому

    it WAS combined mpg "I could drive without the visual aids (41.7 combined mpg was the result, bettering the EPA's 34.4 mpg)". Motortrend did not test for mpg in the 3. The 2012 Mazda 3 obtained 34.4 miles to the gallon on average, they only got 41.63 (and yes I know .07 mpg is non-existant and literally makes no difference) and both cars are priced similarly when the Mazda is as well equipped as the Jetta. The worst the Jetta got combined was 41.3 in traffic.

  • @crocop427
    @crocop427 11 років тому

    yes that is in us miles to the gallon. the reason why a bought my tdi about 7 weeks ago was because i have ALOT of frinds that have tdi's. none of them have had and problems with them and when i was in my friends 2011 golf tdi 6-speed, i knew i had to get a tdi. i used to have a 300 srt8, fuel cost was killing me. i fill up about once every 7-10 days and ill get anywhere from 1000-1200 a tank with some fuel left to go. sorry you had bad luck with yours, personally i wish i bought one sooner.

  • @stchman
    @stchman 11 років тому

    The Cruze diesel gets 27 city 46 highway for the diesel according to the EPA. Folks have been regularly getting 50MPG highway in their Cruze diesel.

  • @froochie123
    @froochie123 10 років тому +2

    0-60 in 11 seconds. Great Job Chevy. You really know how to make shit on wheels.

    • @brye-bread
      @brye-bread 10 років тому +4

      It's a diesel.

    • @carena70
      @carena70 10 років тому +1

      i own one,Cruze Diesel, and if he had used the manual mode on trans and shifted himself it would have been a lot faster

    • @anthonybonanni446
      @anthonybonanni446 9 років тому +4

      Because Kia's 10.76 was so stellar, you fucking idiot.

    • @EGGINFOOLS
      @EGGINFOOLS 8 років тому +2

      They are a mile above sea level. Doesn't anyone read or listen.

    • @kdash3215
      @kdash3215 8 років тому +1

      Trust me, they didn't launch that Forte right either. Granted, they are a mile above see level but I have seen high 7s in those cars. It does have a lot of extra feature too weighing it down.

  • @TCPUDPATM
    @TCPUDPATM 10 років тому +1

    The problem isn't the back seat - it's that Americans are expanding lol

  • @SwPiotrek
    @SwPiotrek 11 років тому

    Cool review.
    Unfortunately I don't agree with you. Cruze looks much nicer inside and outside.

  • @Drendle87
    @Drendle87 11 років тому

    Woah people..calmness..and a little rationality. I havent drove the Cruz TDI yet...but I have driven the 2014 forte. It's not a bad little car at all. Seriously. Now the engine and handling didnt surprise me any , but the interior did almost everything right. I think KIA's past is still haunting some people perception. There are better cars out there for sure, but not for the cost. The 1.6 turbo cruze was a pretty peppy drive. I liked it as well.

  • @brandoneney6206
    @brandoneney6206 9 років тому

    ive got that exact forte and i get to 60 in like 8 seconds flat. itll be much faster when im done tuning it.

  • @TerryFilming
    @TerryFilming 11 років тому

    I don't understand why Chevrolet is claiming that the Cruze is one of the best "American" cards when the Cruze has been sold as the Daewoo Lacetti in South Korea since 2009.
    Everything in the car was designed and created by Korean people.

  • @KanishQQuotes
    @KanishQQuotes 11 років тому

    I love Nathan

  • @jackzakowski6952
    @jackzakowski6952 11 років тому

    What do Volkswagen owners know about reliability?

  • @jacobyoung574
    @jacobyoung574 11 років тому

    Thanks for the reply. Maybe turbo-normalized designs are only used in airplanes. The next time you talk to the Chevy engineers, please ask :)

  • @SilverTurtle65
    @SilverTurtle65 11 років тому +1

    Cruze diesel is the best new car to come from GM in a long time, Great MPG

  • @JAKE20fivefive
    @JAKE20fivefive 11 років тому

    Is that US miles per gallon? My TDI is not new, it had 42,000 miles when I sold it. I also have the same driving habits with all my cars. That's what real-world mileage is to me. It's something you never have to think about, you just drive it like you normally would.

  • @boberson33
    @boberson33 11 років тому

    The MPG is 27/46, and in any circumstance, diesel sedans will get better fuel economy than stated by EPA

  • @Jr210100
    @Jr210100 11 років тому

    That's what they're supposed to do, but they don't always work correctly. Most people in the trucking industry absolutely hate the emissions control systems. The cost of being compliant has literally put some in the industry out of business ,or it has forced them into a new path. I don't think particulate filters are problematic, I know they are. Calling a dealership for information about car problems is naïve. It's just like calling a cigarette company for information about cancer prevention.

  • @Kyt2024
    @Kyt2024 10 років тому

    Also failed to mention that the Forte at the price point they spoke of, would have been fully loaded, including navigation and premium package.

    • @sammyp8647
      @sammyp8647 7 років тому

      KNorth2 don't forget the turbo engine

  • @jackzakowski6952
    @jackzakowski6952 11 років тому

    Yes, but they get to tell that story much more often.

  • @DaRockWilder100
    @DaRockWilder100 11 років тому

    Btw new cruzes are rpm locked for break in like vw's for the first 1000 miles, the car is way faster after...

  • @salas231141
    @salas231141 7 років тому +1

    What about for pizza delivery. Would you recommend?

  • @dmsp3677
    @dmsp3677 11 років тому

    i think the main difference between these two vehicles will turn to being how reliable that diesel engine is within the chevy

  • @sethchakoy1511
    @sethchakoy1511 11 років тому

    I demand a manual transmission for the cruze! On the specs it shows the diesel cruze gets 8.6 secs to 60 mph.

  • @WorldOfIvillis
    @WorldOfIvillis 11 років тому

    Dude the forte isn't their entry level car, the Rio is. You can go to their website and find this sort of information. And it starts at $13,600

  • @BigBoiYami
    @BigBoiYami 7 років тому

    I have a Forte, after work it pushes around 220 in horsepower now

  • @blane237
    @blane237 11 років тому

    There is no other car in this class to consider other than the 2014 Mazda 3.

  • @ndubs68
    @ndubs68 11 років тому

    Those mpg numbers were reversed in the vid

  • @sleepcult
    @sleepcult 11 років тому

    I'm not sure this is the best match up you could've done. You're comparing the 2104 Forte which was JUST redesigned for that year, to the 2014 Cruze which has been the same body style and same interior since it came out for the 2011 model year. The only difference being the MyLink and the 2.0TD engine. Compare the 2013 models are wait for the Cruze to be redesigned in a couple of years.

  • @justhes
    @justhes 11 років тому +2

    Rather have the Forte

  • @1guyin10
    @1guyin10 11 років тому

    The US spec Passat is not rated anywhere near 55 mpg. You might get that with careful driving, but you could do the same with the Cruze. The current crop of TDI VWs really suffer under US emissions requirements.

  • @zacr3
    @zacr3 11 років тому

    if the traction control is off the rev limiter goes up to 4 grand

  • @boberson33
    @boberson33 11 років тому

    Do you have the driving habits of Danika Patrick? Because handbrake turns into parking spots, burnouts at every stop light, running with the A/C on Max with the windows down, and waiting until 7000 RPM is NOT real-world.

  • @PianoandCarcrack94
    @PianoandCarcrack94 11 років тому

    In Europe almost every car in every segment has a diesel version, diesels being more popular.

  • @Dheyaa100
    @Dheyaa100 10 років тому

    Im an 18 year old and Ive always driven 6 cylinders idk about 4 they're weak and rev up high for no reason

  • @JAKE20fivefive
    @JAKE20fivefive 11 років тому

    Gees, stop guessing what I did or didn't do. I did more than what you said to do. I went for a hour to hour and a half long highway drive almost almost every other day with the car. Stop telling what I did wrong, or what I should be doing with a car I don't even own anymore. The car got 34 mpg,... stop making a big fuss over it.

  • @bmwmsport11
    @bmwmsport11 11 років тому

    compare the Cruze diesel to the Jetta TDI! the cruze diesel is nice but i think VW's DSG shifts better.

  • @trinisuprazee
    @trinisuprazee 11 років тому

    agreed!

  • @boberson33
    @boberson33 11 років тому

    So, you were doing something wrong. You're suppose to drive on the highway, or at least 50 miles an hour, every 400 miles or so, for about 20 minutes to regenerate, if it regenerates frequently, either you do drive like Danika, or you need to have your DPF checked, also, get a DPF delete or choose not DPF (such as Urea or Bluetec) if you don't want to run into these kind of issues.