Best Juicer: Angel vs Pure juicer -

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 98

  • @theresahouck3516
    @theresahouck3516 Рік тому +16

    I own an Angel Juicer and I absolutely LOVE IT!!!

  • @cagedgreed
    @cagedgreed 11 місяців тому +6

    Great comparison! The kids really brightened up the video, so tell them all what a wonderful job they did! I used to think I wanted a Norwalk like my Granny had (she did the Gerson Therapy and got cured of stage 4 colon cancer and lived another 40 years), but I have used a Greenstar (a poor man's Angel juicer) for the last 20 years or so and absolutely love it, especially for wheat grass and other leafy greens combined with apples, carrots, and celery. Great health to you!

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  11 місяців тому +1

      Greenstar is a great juicer. Great to hear about grandma. Blessings to you.

  • @mekashealingjourney
    @mekashealingjourney Рік тому +15

    Wow thank you so so much for doing this comparison video. I’m so glad I have the angel juicer . I’ve made comparison videos of the angel and other popular juicers but I haven’t seen it compared with the pure juicer this really helps. I actually like some pulp in the angel juice because that means I’m getting some fibre, and I like the Angel because I can rejuice the pulp and get even more juice. The yield is amazing. Now I can confidently recommend the angel juicer to friends and family

    • @theresahouck3516
      @theresahouck3516 Рік тому

      YES, I agree.I love my Angel. Keep it on my countertop. Love the pulp too

    • @healthfullivingify
      @healthfullivingify Рік тому +6

      Hi, Meka. The reason their taste test favored the Pure's juice was exactly for your reasoning- there is a subtle amount of pulp in the Angel juice since it was not (high speed) pre-ground and then squeezed through a press bag or cloth. Thus a slight bitterness can be detected in the Angel due to produce's SKINS. However, John Kohler of Discount Juicers and others have pointed up how the SKINS contain equal and sometimes superior nutrient densities to the 'naked' (Pure) juice devoid of any pulp.

  • @protochris
    @protochris 11 місяців тому +11

    The very best juicer is the one you will use the most. Also, the reason Gershon recommends the Pure is because it "grinds" open cell walls of the plant instead of "crushes" like the Angel. There have been a number of tests and apparently the Angel does not release as much of the "cancer fighting" nutrients as the Pure/Norwalk/Champion-Welles press method.

    • @Dax108
      @Dax108 8 місяців тому +2

      Yet plenty of people have used the Angel to cure every stage cancer. Now Gerson recommended.

    • @thatguy1729
      @thatguy1729 8 місяців тому

      ​@@Dax108 Where? Not on their website. They recommend a champion as a grinder only. I've not seen them recommend any masticating juicer.

    • @aoreliasamantha5339
      @aoreliasamantha5339 Місяць тому +1

      Thanks for this comment. Helpful! I have a pure and I love it. But still I was wondering if I should get an Angel because I would like to implement green juices as well. But in this video I saw that it definetly was possible to also make green juices with the pure and that the pure has half as much rotations (rpm) as the angel. And I just can't get warm with the angel. I tried but my feeling says no. My most favorite juicer to use is the champion. But I don't like the pulpe residue - so I'm now "spoiled" from the Pure Juicer. Once you know the difference, you know it and it's difficult to go back. You would need a convincing reason to do so. 😉
      What I find difficult with the Pure Juicer is the neat polished metal look. I can't just leave my gear to dry like the Champion Gear made out of plastic. It would get stains and I wanna treat it well. But it makes the experience of using and cleaning the machine less enjoyable.
      (I don't have a dishwasher).
      But what probably also shaped my experience is that I tried to do the Gerson Therapy - well very experimentally and only if even the half amount - because I didn't know how it would ever be possible to completely do it as well as finance it at the time. The work load is unimaginable and so i still pressed my 7 fresh juices a day and I feel like I sort of created an immunity towards juicing with this juicer. Because I was so stressed and it was so much work and my hands were wet all the time from washing.
      But I also enjoyed the juicing experience of the Pure Juicer and the health benefits and learning and the taste of the juices 😋.
      So I guess it was time now to vent and share some of my experience after about a year or so. Thx for the space. ❤
      I might be able to approach my Pure Juicer from a different angle now and find a good way to use it.

  • @ericamankiwong
    @ericamankiwong 5 місяців тому +1

    I have an Angel juicer and it’s the best investment. I bought it in 2012 and it’s still working perfectly.

  • @sanfot8489
    @sanfot8489 11 місяців тому +1

    C'est le seul vrai comparatif honnête et objectif sur UA-cam!! Merci.🙏

  • @SirMika9
    @SirMika9 11 місяців тому +4

    I have my angel 5500 since 10 year and I still love it very much. I bought the european version of the Nama J2 to my mother and the yield is just very poor compared to the angel. But on another side it's easier to use than the angel for some fruits. If we do lot of juice, the better yield will quickly refund the price difference IMO. With carrot etc, I got like maybe 2x times the yield.

  • @markbell2663
    @markbell2663 Рік тому +6

    @3:34 the Pure juicer is not a slow turning juicer at 43 rpm’s. The cutter revolves in the 3500 rpm range around 43 times faster than the Angel.

    • @ia6980
      @ia6980 3 місяці тому

      Thnku

  • @f00bar28
    @f00bar28 8 місяців тому +2

    Thanks for your review!
    You can even get more juice from the Angel from refeeding the pressed pulp back into the chute again!

  • @aslee330
    @aslee330 Рік тому +1

    now THIS is a solid juice review. Thank you for doing an amazing job!

  • @healthfullivingify
    @healthfullivingify Рік тому +9

    Hi, Chad and family. You made a great video. I own an Angel and have had a Norwalk, the predecessor to the Pure. Probably the reason why the Pure makes slightly less quantity and tastes slightly purer is the fact that the Angel grinds the produce between gears and its auger pushes the juice through a sieve screen, while the Pure squeezes the juice through a filter bag or cloth.
    You said the Angel revolves at 82 rpm and the Pure at 43 rpm. In actuality the CUTTER of the Pure rotates at around 3600 rpm, which is the speed of the speed of the electric motor.
    Thus for sheer prana, or life force preservation the Angel is better as it NEVER fractionates the pulp by spinning it rapidly through the air even inside a tube as the Pure does during grinding.
    Having owned both types I agree they are each the top of their lines (slow speed/twin gear and fast grinder/hydraulic press).
    Whenever I first drink the Angel's juice I always think of drinking 'paint' as the pigments and thickness of the juice are always stunning.
    The juice press (2-stage Pure) makes juice which has no solids so it is solvent running through the body, and thus a favorite of Gerson therapy proponents for cleansing.

    • @eveoff
      @eveoff Рік тому +2

      I think I saw one other comparison of the two and even after pressing the angel juice through a cloth basically making it pulp less the amount of juice didn't change much. Angels is just the best with yields and also with destroying plant cell walls.

    • @SirMika9
      @SirMika9 11 місяців тому +2

      We can just filter the angel juice when putting it in bottle...

    • @healthfullivingify
      @healthfullivingify 3 місяці тому

      @@eveoff Totally agree. I get about 40% more juice running my Angel.

  • @Crayfish-
    @Crayfish- Рік тому +1

    @ 7:54 The " Press Cloth " was called " Muslin Cloths " ! They can Also be Purchased as bags !
    They are " High Quality " & " High Strength " !

  • @dopamin_express
    @dopamin_express 3 місяці тому +1

    It depends on what you are juicing. The Angel Juicer is the best for greens and hard vegetables, while hydraulic presses are better for fruit and citrus fruits. 🙂

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  3 місяці тому

      I never tried fruit. I should have tried that. Thanks.

    • @epg423
      @epg423 Місяць тому

      Is it better than a manual citrus juicer too? Like those ones you pull on the lever that cost about 200$. Is the press really better for fruits than the angel?

    • @dopamin_express
      @dopamin_express Місяць тому

      @@epg423 if you are mainly juicing citrus fruits, manuel presses are good enough. The Angel Juicer is the best juicer for greens such as celery, leafy vegetables and grasses.

  • @annick9684
    @annick9684 Рік тому +6

    Nice review. One thing missing in the comparison is the review of the whole proces. Although the pure gives fantastic results, the whole process seems cumbersome…. Pressing, collect in a cloth, fold it, dripping, move to the press etc etc seems such a hassle and the biggest reason for me to pass on the pure. Washing the cloth as well takes time. Keep up the good work!

    • @Forever_Elegant
      @Forever_Elegant 10 місяців тому +2

      It's the weight of the PURE machine for me, plus all those steps involved to make the juice plus the clean-up. I have the top of the line Angel juicer, so I'm good.

    • @k.michellen3790
      @k.michellen3790 6 днів тому

      I really feel like the main thing that they skipped on this video is expressing how the pure juicer does not kill the live nutrients that fight cancer that is the whole concept behind the pure juicer. It is not ruining your food before it gets into your stomach it is keeping the nutrients that are actively fighting disease alive until we consume them which is exactly what we need even if we aren't sick.

  • @PlantNews
    @PlantNews Рік тому +10

    Nice comparison ALTHOUGH all the influencers today are using the Nama juicer and would have liked to see that in the lineup. Actually, would like to see like 10 juicers lined up for comparison! 😅

    • @cantala13
      @cantala13 Рік тому +2

      Nothing beats the Nama in my opinion, so much less work but pretty much extracts every ounce of juice

    • @Forever_Elegant
      @Forever_Elegant 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@cantala13 I'm thinking about purchasing the Nama 2, and its price point is not too bad either.

    • @cantala13
      @cantala13 10 місяців тому +1

      @Forever_Elegant do it! One of the best purchases I've ever made

    • @jmast1
      @jmast1 3 місяці тому

      Thanks for the tip

  • @samuelmatthews9092
    @samuelmatthews9092 7 місяців тому

    This was a pretty cool video y’all. It seems that the yield was higher with the Angel juicer largely due to the pulp factor. More pulp equals a higher yield, which is good for those who like a pulpier juice, but for those of us who don’t, it’s PURE JUICER for the win!

  • @splinter2804
    @splinter2804 Рік тому +1

    This was a very good n fair comparison....good job bro

  • @Leo1903able
    @Leo1903able Рік тому

    I have an Angel juicer but have never heard of the Pure brand. Thanks for doing a comparison. Another thing worth noting is the counter top space needed between these juicers. From the appearance, I suspect that not many would have the counter top space for the Pure.

  • @upendomweusi
    @upendomweusi Місяць тому +1

    I don't have either of these juicers, but when I saw how the children over-stuffed the cloth with the vegetables for the Pure Juicer, it would not have extracted enough of the juice. I would have to say that this demonstration was deceptive.

    • @k.michellen3790
      @k.michellen3790 6 днів тому

      I don't agree with your verbiage on Deception I just think that that was the way they do it. To each their own right? I just don't feel like it's right that you say that they are deceiving us because they are not they are doing a great job

  • @BeautifulDaphanie
    @BeautifulDaphanie Рік тому

    Thanks for your fun review!!!

  • @Purejuicer
    @Purejuicer Рік тому +6

    Kudos to you for this video and wow, what a beautiful family you have. Thank you for being so intentional with your juicing protocol.
    This video is more a great homeschool project than a proper review. The Angel which takes no skill to operate is being run by an adult, and the PURE which takes some practice is being run by some children. I'm not convinced the yields or cleaning times have been fully optimized.
    When juicing celery or anything that is over 75% water on the PURE, we strongly recommend using a strainer, see page 35 of the owners manual, "how to juice juicy produce".
    Celery, the PURE yields 82% juice. 1lb of celery should yield 13oz juice. this should meet or exceed other juicers yields.
    RPM, The PURE is 3450rpm, this allows for big batch juicing, see below.
    Cleaning time, in doing testing it is important have all things be equal. We love that you are involving your children. Please redo the test and have your kids clean the Angel and you clean the PURE then average your times. IMO the PURE is easier and faster to clean than any other juicer on the market. FWIW, when I juice test, I cut all my produce in half and divide between the two test juicers, this controls for any batch variation that may be present.
    One thing not discussed is big batch juicing. The PURE excels here as minimal pre-cutting is required. With the Angels in-feed there is an appropriate 1.5" inner diameter (1.75sq/in), on the PURE the inner 2.25"diameter (4.0sq/in) is more than 2x the area. The larger in-feed and efficient cutter allow for up to 2 gallons per hour of juice.
    Thank you for reviewing both juicers.
    David F

    • @PlantNews
      @PlantNews Рік тому

      Wow thanks for the details!

    • @Purejuicer
      @Purejuicer Рік тому +2

      You are most welcome. Please do note, the review is really not fully accurate when an adult is doing 1/2 and his beautiful, but possibly 'not your equal children' are doing the other half. I'm glad you had fun and are teaching them so well @PlantNews

    • @lilylebowsky5908
      @lilylebowsky5908 4 дні тому

      Actually great to hear from you! Thanks

  • @SirMika9
    @SirMika9 11 місяців тому

    You have to put the bowl under the end of the angel juicer to support it for when you push down... There is a place for it.

  • @anonanon7278
    @anonanon7278 4 дні тому

    I wonder if the higher yields from the Angel Juicer are a result of the extra pulp the juice has in it.

  • @vincentmulder
    @vincentmulder Рік тому +2

    Have you noticed the juice color difference? On other channels I have seen especially the color of apple juice is darker from the hydraulic press. It’s been said it’s due to oxidation produced with the high speed cutter.

    • @theresahouck3516
      @theresahouck3516 Рік тому

      the slower the better I've heard

    • @healthfullivingify
      @healthfullivingify Рік тому +3

      You make the correct deduction. Any time we cut/shred produce at high speed (Pure juice press/grinders spin at the rpm's of their electric motor which is 3600 rpm I believe- I used to have a Norwalk, the Pure's predecessor), the prana or life force of the produce gets flung into the ether. Using a slow speed juicer like the Angel which NEVER spins above 82 rpm we maintain the integrity of the produce etherically.

  • @saeedal4196
    @saeedal4196 Рік тому

    Greetings to you. Most of those interested in the specialized method of juicing are waiting for this comparison between Pure Juicer and Angel Juicer. There are some details that were not mentioned regarding the angle jucer , who used it, which is the 3Greetings to you. Most of those interested in the specialized method of juicing are waiting for this comparison between Pure Juicer and Angel Juicer. There are some details that were not mentioned regarding the Juicer’s son, Kony, who used it, which is the motor power is 180 watts, which is not ambitious compared to the price, which makes the juicer vulnerable to high motor temperature. Thank you again. motor power is 180 watts, which is not ambitious compared to the price, which makes the juicer vulnerable to high motor temperature. Thank you again.

  • @marramamba7629
    @marramamba7629 10 місяців тому

    Maybe I did not hear it but I wanted to know the juicing time instead of the cleaning time.
    Also, the Pure is high speed not slow. If you like pulp and juice more like a smoothie then Angel is the winner. If your are fighting a serious disease then Pure might be the best choice. Almost zero digestive load.
    I am surprised by by the yield. My pulp cakes from the Pure just crumble apart. That makes me wonder which grid you used?The#10 on the Pure produces an ultra fine grind and is reported as being the best at yields on greens.
    Thanks for your review.

  • @deucevision2234
    @deucevision2234 Рік тому

    Nice comparison video. If the oulp from the Angel is an issue you can always pour your juice through a strainer to remove. Also would like to know if the cleaning of the press cloths was included in the 7 minute time frame? What is the process for cleaning the press cloths? I would think that would be the biggest hassle with using the Pure juicer.

  • @ia6980
    @ia6980 3 місяці тому

    Ordered angel 7500 through your link. Thank you

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  3 місяці тому +1

      Thanks. I hope you enjoy it. It is one of the few things in life that I repeatedly think, “I am glad we bought that thing. Blessings.

    • @ia6980
      @ia6980 3 місяці тому

      ​@@HealthAndHomesteadthanks

  • @sahar5177
    @sahar5177 16 днів тому

    I wish you would add a cheap one, like the ninja to the comparation, just to see if the differences are that big of a gap

  • @aoreliasamantha5339
    @aoreliasamantha5339 Місяць тому

    Thankyou. This was very helpful. I wonder: if you would press out the remaining pulpe from the angel juicer - would the remaining juice be noticeably less and then closer to yield of the pure juicer (since the pure leaves no pulp in the juice)? Thx 🎉

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  Місяць тому +1

      I do not believe the Pure would still produce as much juice as the Angel even if you strained the little bit of pulp out. But keep in mind the Pure tastes better. But you would never know unless you tasted them head to head.

    • @aoreliasamantha5339
      @aoreliasamantha5339 Місяць тому

      @@HealthAndHomestead thx for the (quick) response 🙌

  • @deborahortwine5283
    @deborahortwine5283 Рік тому +1

    My juicer runs much slower and I get so much more juice out of it. When I changed to a slow juicer that was drastically different and so munch better as I was getting more juice. The pulp actually came out completely dry. Even your angel juicer looks like the pulp is still damp.

  • @Thesetcollector
    @Thesetcollector Рік тому +1

    I wonder, which would juice juicy fruit better? I hear juicier fruit get stuck in juicers like the angel. But are great for hardy fruits and veggies. Any thoughts?

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  Рік тому +1

      I have not personally tried fruit on the Angel. But Angel makes a separate part called the SFH filter for softer fruit. But that is an extra $240. I can’t say how good it works since I haven’t tried it. All the best.

  • @HealthAndHomestead
    @HealthAndHomestead  Рік тому +1

    Discount for Angel Juicer angeljuiceramerica.com?bg_ref=NIdivCY2vI
    For the Angel Juicer Stainless Steel normal amzn.to/45KVjiO
    For the Angel Juicer Surgical Stainless steel amzn.to/3YVa4xs
    For the Pure Juicer amzn.to/3YYeund
    The above links are angel juicer or amazon affiliate links. They cost you nothing extra but give me a commission

    • @plu2601
      @plu2601 2 місяці тому

      Thank you for the video! I use the affiliate link above and could not find $50 discount at the check out page of Angel Juicer website. Is there a discount code? Thank you!

  • @being4447
    @being4447 3 місяці тому

    Pure: which blade did you use. Serrated blade?

  • @chelsiewiltshire
    @chelsiewiltshire Рік тому +2

    Angel juicer or Nama j2?

  • @plu2601
    @plu2601 2 місяці тому

    How do you get $50 off? I used the affiliate link to Angel's website and did not see a $50 discount code. Is there a discount code that I need to enter? Thank you for the video!

  • @eyemakeuplooks
    @eyemakeuplooks Рік тому +2

    What's the difference between angel vs nama juicer?

    • @eveoff
      @eveoff Рік тому +3

      Angel is harder to use because you have to feed it but give you perfect yields and best cell breakage. Pretty much the best machine for someone trying to cure themselves. Nama has lowe yields but much easier time with fruits and overall much easier operation since you just fill the hopper and let it work. Perfect juicer for everyday juicing.

  • @BobS-ql4kk
    @BobS-ql4kk 3 місяці тому +1

    Angel vs Greenstar pro vs Sana 929

  • @xisigma
    @xisigma 6 місяців тому

    Why'd you get both. Is one better for certain uses?

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  6 місяців тому

      Those children are not mine. Their parents own the Pure. I own the Angel. I bought the Angel used. Personally I would not buy both. Blessings.

  • @marie-oq1ps
    @marie-oq1ps 8 місяців тому

    What model Agel did you use in this video?

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  8 місяців тому

      I think it is a 3500. They don’t make it anymore. It is old. But still works great.

  • @selfcontrol9982
    @selfcontrol9982 Рік тому

    I believe juicers get rid of the valuable parts of fruits and vegetables. Fiber is important.

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  Рік тому +1

      Fiber is very important. I don't believe people should get most of their veggies in the form of juice. I do think there are a few situations where it is helpful to juice. Fiber is one of the most important things in the diet. I eat a super high fiber diet.

    • @opdgrow4life
      @opdgrow4life 8 місяців тому

      Buddy if you think fiber is the most important parts of fruits and vegetables you clearly have no idea what phytonutrients and minerals are......

  • @Momma1234
    @Momma1234 Рік тому

    Technique is important using the PURE juicer, you have to fold the press clothe and press more than once…. You aren’t disclosing the technique used with the PURE machine

    • @HealthAndHomestead
      @HealthAndHomestead  Рік тому +2

      They did it twice for each batch with the Pure. One time they did a third but the third press looked quite brown so we did not use that juice. It seemed like two times seemed best.

    • @healthfullivingify
      @healthfullivingify Рік тому +4

      By the same token one can run Angel juice pulp through a second time. That mimics your idea of flipping the pulp cloths of a Pure over. Having owned both a Norwalk (of which the Pure is an enhanced update) and currently owning an Angel, I can tell you running pulp through an Angel twice would match the Pure with 2 pressings. Both make great juices.
      The demo in this video was fair- one pass through the Angel and one through the PURE.
      The PURE spins very rapidly (3600 rpm) on the grinding side. The Angel never spins any produce faster than 82rpm. If you had a machine measuring prana or life force you'd see the Angel keeps the produce integral etherically, but that is for future explorations. Be happy if you have either juicer- they are the best.
      Now that we have vacuum blending available we know that removing the oxygen from a blender before running its cycle keeps the produce in a smoothie from getting aerated and tasting inferior, lasting less time for shelf life. Fast spinning cutters on Norwalks and PURE juice grinder-presses are a compromise to shred the pulp finely and get on with pressing. Either juice is very good for us.

  • @louis-chanel323
    @louis-chanel323 7 місяців тому

    👍

  • @WikiAjuda
    @WikiAjuda 8 місяців тому

    you need a whole new kitchen just to fit that pure juicer lol... for real.. its huge..

  • @JamesWang-ps9sk
    @JamesWang-ps9sk Рік тому

    I don't think he is doing honest comparison, twin gear juicer can not possibly beat hydraulic press juicer, period !

    • @healthfullivingify
      @healthfullivingify Рік тому +4

      The test results are true- I own an Angel and have earlier owned a Norwalk juice press which works exactly like the newer Pure which has a few subtle enhancements.

    • @JamesWang-ps9sk
      @JamesWang-ps9sk Рік тому +1

      @@healthfullivingify
      Thank you very much for the reply, I believe you and will likely get angel juicer if I want to upgrade, I am not happy with my omeg juicer which can only get 48 oz juice from 10 pounds of carrots.

  • @marvinratchford7913
    @marvinratchford7913 8 місяців тому

    thanks for such a professional comparison. Congratulations for both your daughter's proficiency with the juicers. I would encourage ensuring a #12 grid is used and to use a 𝗖𝗹𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗿 to simply catch the pulp in addition to the 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗖𝗹𝗼𝘁𝗵. By the CEO David: 6 minute video ua-cam.com/video/EvmPpL2Zfio/v-deo.html
    2 1/2 minute video: ua-cam.com/video/1gU14ov8hbM/v-deo.html

    • @marvinratchford7913
      @marvinratchford7913 8 місяців тому

      You may have seen this juicer tip and review already... ua-cam.com/video/ZscjwRZVy8A/v-deo.html

  • @jamesmatters3905
    @jamesmatters3905 10 місяців тому

    to much of a mess, just make soup instead.

  • @_Keith_
    @_Keith_ 2 місяці тому

    I just bought a Pure juicer, but didn't know about Angel. If I buy a second one, like for a different location, or other people, I think you might've sold me on trying the Angel. 🥬😇🪽