Learning Design vs Instructional Design: There is a BIG difference

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лип 2022
  • Is there a difference between Instructional Design (ID) and Learning Design (LD)? The short answer is YES!
    In this video, I explain the differences between Learning Design and Instructional Design and why I default more to Learning Design in e-learning development.
    Please drop your number one takeaway or any questions in the comments below.
    Thanks for watching, and stay awesome!
    --- Related Content -
    Why teachers make the BEST eLearning Designers (3 skills that matter) • Why teachers make the ...
    --
    👨‍👨‍👦‍👦 JOIN THE LEARNING DESIGN ROCKS COMMUNITY:
    oppidalearning.thinkific.com/
    --
    👋 MEET BIANCA RABY:
    biancaraby.com/
    --
    📶 CAREER COACHING FOR EDUCATORS:
    biancaraby.com/career-coaching
    --
    FREE COURSES/DOWNLOADS:
    ⬇️ Sign up for my FREE COURSE on “Designing Digital Learning” here:
    oppidalearning.thinkific.com/...
    Lots of golden nuggets in there!
    ⬇️ Download my FREE STAR MODEL TEMPLATE here:
    biancaraby.com/free-star-temp...
    ⬇️ Download my FREE Teacher in Transition Reflection TEMPLATE here:
    biancaraby.com/free-teacher-i...
    ⬇️ Download my FREE Project Scoping Template here:
    biancaraby.com/free-project-s...
    --
    🚀 KICKSTART YOUR CAREER
    Are you an early career Learning Designer, a K-12 teacher, an L&D trainer, or an HR manager?
    Enrol in the Learning Design Microcredential to kickstart your career now: oppidalearning.thinkific.com/...
    📖 CHECK OUT MY BOOK: Online Learning. So, you want to be a Learning Designer?
    amzn.to/3tzRXi0
    --
    Subscribe for fortnightly videos on instructional design, eLearning and teacher transition: bit.ly/48YJVRV
    Let's connect! Follow Bianca Raby on LinkedIn: / biancaraby
    For business inquiries, speaking gigs or partnership opportunities please email me at hello@biancaraby.com
    #InstructionalDesign
    #LearningDesign

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @kabiruadisasoretire2635
    @kabiruadisasoretire2635 2 місяці тому +4

    To me, instructional design is more appropriate, we should note that learning is the desired response, instruction entails setting-up of stimuli that can trigger desire response while teaching is the implementation of instruction. Instruction in education context is not only entail verbal command, it encompasses all stimuli put in place for learning to take place. Technology only takeaway/modify the role of teachers (content delivery) it does not take away the role of instructional design. Thank you.

  • @petertwyman5250
    @petertwyman5250 3 місяці тому +4

    The learner doesn't care if the learning was designed by an instructional designer or a learning designer, so it's just semantics in the end.

  • @mpandlane
    @mpandlane Рік тому +9

    You can't really design learning (or 'what is learnt'). You can design the experience (or 'opportunity') within which people learn. So I'm going with LXD.
    Maybe you can do something on why we should lose the 'D' in 'L&D'

    • @biancaraby5205
      @biancaraby5205  Рік тому +2

      Thanks Gerrit, yes great idea. I love talking about the design process!

    • @whatyouneedtoknow
      @whatyouneedtoknow Рік тому

      Can you design an experience?

  • @lc3507
    @lc3507 10 днів тому

    I realize that I am responding late to this thread, but I personally believe that Instructional Design is the more appropriate term. Learning is a process, a journey the student embarks on, in their quest for new knowledge. On the other hand, instruction is presumed to be in the correct processes and thereby taking away the right learning outcomes. Oftentimes, students "learn" incomplete or flat-out erroneous information. Hence, the need for a subject matter expert's input and evaluation of what the student should have learned as compared to what the student actually learned. In the end, I believe it is mostly a matter of semantics but if I were forced to choose the more appropriate term, its Instructional Design.

  • @TMLevel1
    @TMLevel1 Місяць тому

    Yes , I agree with you. Thank you very much for sharing with us. it is very useful for us teaching TVET training

  • @supriyosingharoy7290
    @supriyosingharoy7290 8 місяців тому +1

    What are the different types of learning design?please answer 🙏🙏

  • @deandra19pbp
    @deandra19pbp Рік тому

    This is an excellent perspective!

  • @mebude
    @mebude Рік тому +1

    @Bianca Raby your perspective is accurate but, what then do you think of Program Design... some even say e-Learning designer as a term reduces the role of HR in L&D who aren't tech-savvy, Teachers have an advantage here but the existing gatekeepers seem like a generalist conventional occupations who are the real issues in a world of pluralized occupational nomenclature.

  • @simisolaaluko6469
    @simisolaaluko6469 Рік тому

    Great Insight

  • @PacoTabares
    @PacoTabares Рік тому +3

    i think Learning Experiences design is the best title for the instructional designer to migrate to new LXD

    • @biancaraby5205
      @biancaraby5205  Рік тому +1

      Yes, I also like that term! Although, if we understand that learning is an experience by default then the word becomes superfluous. That is why I chose to stick to just "Learning Design".

    • @PacoTabares
      @PacoTabares Рік тому +2

      @@biancaraby5205 The need to call it "learning experience" lies in the difference between knowledge transfer (passive action of the student) and learning (the need to go through an experience of practicing the transfer of acquired knowledge to achieve learning). In addition, there are many types of experiences (immediate, relational or spiral) for this reason it is necessary to mention it as a "learning experience". You can take a course to ride a bike, but if you don't go through the learning experience, you never really get to ride the bike.

  • @Exegesis66
    @Exegesis66 6 місяців тому

    I prefer LED, turning the light on learning as a Learning Experience Designer. But, MIT uses Learning Architect. Others like Learning Engineer (Bror Saxberg founder of LearningForge). Instructional Design is the term most known, and IF it were integrated with ADDIE + Design Principles then = LED for all intents and purposes.

  • @MichAndo2712
    @MichAndo2712 Місяць тому

    I would Instructional Designer because I don’t always develop traditional learning/training for process or system changes, as it may simply be a set of other resources, such work instructions, qrgs or procedural guides provided to end users. I would also think there is sometimes a need for an Instructional Designers and sometimes a Learning Experience Designer or for some projects both skills could apply.

    • @biancaraby5205
      @biancaraby5205  24 дні тому

      I totally agree! There is a need for both, depending on the outcomes intended!

  • @alexdavidsalas
    @alexdavidsalas 4 місяці тому

    This is just opinion right? Learning also makes it less specific which means you don't have to show effectiveness or measure specifically. Keep it ambiguous and you can keep making it pretty.

  • @mohslimani5716
    @mohslimani5716 Місяць тому

    Freedom for innocent Kabyles unjustly condamned

  • @whatyouneedtoknow
    @whatyouneedtoknow Рік тому +2

    I don't think there are two roles - just a change in name. Nor do I think learners will be aware of the difference. There's also value in videoing a lecture and putting notes up - eg for people who can't attend. For me, it's always been horses for courses - what's the best available medium for the task. BTW I don't think you can actually design learning unless you change the meaning of learning - see here ua-cam.com/video/qir0vQJquDs/v-deo.html

    • @biancaraby5205
      @biancaraby5205  Рік тому

      Thanks for your insights. I agree that sometimes lectures being posted online can be helpful, however, I would not sell that as an online course. To me, it is more of a 'bonus' if you are enrolled in a face-to-face program. What do you believe the definition of learning is?

    • @shapers7644
      @shapers7644 Рік тому

      At Shapers we've designed e-learning for employees who were used to coursed made by instructional designers. I can asure you they noticed the difference. Their feedback was clear: this is much better, more engaging and more enjoyable than what we had before. ID and LXD are two very different approaches to solving similar problems. They both have their strengths and weaknesses as each has their own perspective, methodology, toolkit and skillset. The main reason why the distinction is not always made is due to the fact that people use the term LXD loosely and quite a few instructional designers simply change their title to learning experience designer without really changing anything.

    • @biancaraby5205
      @biancaraby5205  Рік тому +2

      @@shapers7644 I couldn't agree more! Thanks for your input :)

    • @whatyouneedtoknow
      @whatyouneedtoknow Рік тому

      @@biancaraby5205 "I would not sell that as an online course." You probably would if you worked at a university.
      "What do you believe the definition of learning is?" I think you have to work it out for yourself - but it's not training materials.

  • @scottashby6745
    @scottashby6745 5 місяців тому

    I just watched this video a few minutes ago and have already become bored with the term "Learning Design." It just fails to capture the active participation of real people in the process. I prefer the term "Learning Experience Design." Oh shit, now I'm bored with that. I sure hope something else comes along in the next couple of minutes so I can keep pretending that it matters what we call it.

  • @supriyosingharoy7290
    @supriyosingharoy7290 8 місяців тому +1

    What are the different types of learning design?please answer 🙏🙏

  • @supriyosingharoy7290
    @supriyosingharoy7290 8 місяців тому

    What are the different types of learning design?please answer 🙏🙏