5:53 sensible question of whether 37 rather than 35 is of particular significance in a woman’s fertility: response - unscientific, condescending waffle without any stats or science mentioned. Apparently, the scientific question put requires us to instead “be proud of” women’s’ fertility.
Yeah, what's that study Sweden? where older men (and women) had much higher instances of schizophrenia? Let's not also bring up other debilitating issues. Social norms need to change supporting women who decide to have children at a younger age and stop treating male geriatric virility into a positive machismo award.
Wow, that's shoking. Everyone deserves to have a child, regardless of their age, gender, marital status, and sexual orientation. Government doesn't have to pay for this treatment, but prohibit these people all together? Nowadays fascism in Europe :( IVF takes months, you can not do it abroad, unless you move there for 6 months.
Sure enough, if everything goes well this should do the job. But listen, there's one factor that's usually overlooked that can considerably speed up the process, unfortunately I do not have it at hand, but it can be go’ogled Dobbie Nerkstrol's Infertility Cure, I think.
Unmarried women and women not married to a man should not be able to have IVF or any other fertility treatments available to them. This should be left for married couples that are unable to have a baby due to true infertility issues that is no fault of their own.
@@Queenofgreen515 Then that woman has no business having children, because to make a child you need a man and a woman. Can't have it any other way. Children should only be conceived in a marriage between a man and a woman. Everything else is perversion, unnatural and bad for the children that get deprived of having a father and a mother due to unnatural and selfish causes.
@@Queenofgreen515 Imagine the narcissism it takes to want to raise a kid like a pet and not like an actual human being. inner city liberal for sure. mind blowing. human beings arent lab animals to be raised by single feminist women.
@@Queenofgreen515 Im sorry i just fundamentally disagree. In Canada, 72% of all teenage murders are from fatherless people, 60% of rapists, 70% of total kids incarcerated are fatherless, 3 of 4 teen suicides are fatherless, the list goes on, these are facts you cannot argue. Children need a mom AND a dad nad it is selfish and narcisistic to think otherwise.
@@Queenofgreen515 and also to follow up, you prove my point perfectly, by saying its a disservice to single mothers out there etc. that is my point, its not about you or single mothers its about the health and well being of the child PERIOD. people have children for selfish reasons. human beings are not pets.
Dumb people should not be allowed to breed. Your parents should have been denied that. You don’t get to decide who should or should not be parents. If they are healthy physically and mentally then stay in your lane.
A embryo is not a human, humans are BORN people with the ability to think, and feel emotions. Not just have a pumping heart beat, embryos look like mud clumps forming together to form the child. They don’t take a baby shape until 5-6 months. The woman grows it inside of her, she has the right to since a embryo is a parasite feeding off her and growing inside her.
I’m not super sure yet but I just took two test and they look positive (I’m 37 and it’s a surprise-natural), I also had twins at 33 naturally.
did anyone find the source of the study? I could not find it
5:53 sensible question of whether 37 rather than 35 is of particular significance in a woman’s fertility: response - unscientific, condescending waffle without any stats or science mentioned. Apparently, the scientific question put requires us to instead “be proud of” women’s’ fertility.
Yeah, and what about if you are 42. Is it too late for us 40+-year-olds?
Yeah, what's that study Sweden? where older men (and women) had much higher instances of schizophrenia? Let's not also bring up other debilitating issues. Social norms need to change supporting women who decide to have children at a younger age and stop treating male geriatric virility into a positive machismo award.
Wow, that's shoking. Everyone deserves to have a child, regardless of their age, gender, marital status, and sexual orientation. Government doesn't have to pay for this treatment, but prohibit these people all together? Nowadays fascism in Europe :( IVF takes months, you can not do it abroad, unless you move there for 6 months.
Every child deserves a parent not every parent deserves a child
I’m not so sure of this statement. Look at the studies to fatherless children. It’s terrifying.
Don’t lesbian couples have the highest divorce rates? More data?
They do
Dont the children also deserve fathers? Women right over child right?
i agree. it's selfishness
Children deserve a mother and a father
Sure enough, if everything goes well this should do the job. But listen, there's one factor that's usually overlooked that can considerably speed up the process, unfortunately I do not have it at hand, but it can be go’ogled Dobbie Nerkstrol's Infertility Cure, I think.
Kids need fathers. These women are really doing harm to their babies when they purposefully don't provide a stable mother-father household.
Why is it harmful?
agreed
Unmarried women and women not married to a man should not be able to have IVF or any other fertility treatments available to them. This should be left for married couples that are unable to have a baby due to true infertility issues that is no fault of their own.
@@Queenofgreen515 Then that woman has no business having children, because to make a child you need a man and a woman. Can't have it any other way. Children should only be conceived in a marriage between a man and a woman. Everything else is perversion, unnatural and bad for the children that get deprived of having a father and a mother due to unnatural and selfish causes.
@@Queenofgreen515 Imagine the narcissism it takes to want to raise a kid like a pet and not like an actual human being. inner city liberal for sure. mind blowing. human beings arent lab animals to be raised by single feminist women.
@@Queenofgreen515 Im sorry i just fundamentally disagree. In Canada, 72% of all teenage murders are from fatherless people, 60% of rapists, 70% of total kids incarcerated are fatherless, 3 of 4 teen suicides are fatherless, the list goes on, these are facts you cannot argue. Children need a mom AND a dad nad it is selfish and narcisistic to think otherwise.
@@Queenofgreen515 and also to follow up, you prove my point perfectly, by saying its a disservice to single mothers out there etc. that is my point, its not about you or single mothers its about the health and well being of the child PERIOD. people have children for selfish reasons. human beings are not pets.
Dumb people should not be allowed to breed. Your parents should have been denied that.
You don’t get to decide who should or should not be parents. If they are healthy physically and mentally then stay in your lane.
"Women's rights over their own bodies..." And of course the unborn child's rights over their own body too.
Unborn thus has no rights. And also not technically alive just a living organism.
A embryo is not a human, humans are BORN people with the ability to think, and feel emotions. Not just have a pumping heart beat, embryos look like mud clumps forming together to form the child. They don’t take a baby shape until 5-6 months. The woman grows it inside of her, she has the right to since a embryo is a parasite feeding off her and growing inside her.
@@Treekickerhow can you be a living organization and not alive?? 😂😂
Unborn child = What body?
@@lilmamagcyou can barely spell log out pls
GOD DECISION NOT HUMANS 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 remember that if
so wrong