An Introduction to Mathematica and the Wolfram Language for Engineers

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 кві 2016
  • An electrical and computer engineering graduate student researcher shares his insights from academics and industry about how he uses Mathematica and the Wolfram Language, and how it compares to Matlab.
    Download the Notebook: bit.ly/1SNoBmG
    Watch on Wolfram: www.wolfram.com/broadcast/vide...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 79

  • @JackQuark
    @JackQuark 8 років тому +60

    The process of using Mathematica to solve real world problems is quite direct and intuitive.
    I guess there are a lot of hard work behind this to hide the boring details of machine level.

  • @hwmillerser
    @hwmillerser 4 роки тому +11

    Well done, sir. I first got familiar with Mathematica back in 1990 with Mathematica 2.0. I will soon have Mathematica 12.1. Everything I learned thirty years ago is still valid. This program is cumulative. To my mind, nothing is thrown out. As such it is a very big program and no one will ever use all its features. Also, since this was one of the most pirated programs out there for a while, Wolfram introduced a few years back the the "hobbyist" edition for those of us who aren't students or professionals. We just want to explore with this very capable program and not come up with the big bucks this program is deserving of. My only wish is that Wolfram would come out with a paper edition of the manual. It ceased being published with the fifth edition. It would be very expensive and a true mathematic encyclopedia

  • @prawtism
    @prawtism 4 роки тому +24

    Crazy that this has existed for so long I'm only now finding out about it.

  • @dhananjaymahajan1152
    @dhananjaymahajan1152 4 роки тому +10

    Thank you sir... As an engineer this software has already fascinated me... And am looking forward to do some real good work with mathematica as I continue pursuing my Masters in Robotics

  • @absurdengineering
    @absurdengineering 9 місяців тому

    For those who want to know how to get fully symbolic indices: \:2080 through \:2089 gives subscript 0 through subscript 9. Those act like any other character and Mathematica doesn’t treat them specially. So if you just want symbols with subscripts in their names - that’s how. Otherwise, - gives you “real” indices that define functions behind your back. Sometimes that’s desirable eg when using indicial notation.

  • @guillermoluque6909
    @guillermoluque6909 7 років тому +15

    It is really awesome and very well explained. Thank you.

  • @absurdengineering
    @absurdengineering 9 місяців тому

    Another way of seeing it is by recognizing that engineering is all applied math, so having a solid mathematical processing environment can’t but help a lot :)

  • @ClarkTelecom
    @ClarkTelecom 7 років тому +9

    Excellent presentation, many thanks! I am excited that Mathematica comes with the Raspberry Pi 3 Raspbian distribution.

  • @ab_ab_c
    @ab_ab_c 3 роки тому +1

    Very nice program!
    Thanks for sharing an excellent description of it!

  • @ShayanAsim
    @ShayanAsim 3 роки тому +3

    I wish I could DSolve my real life problems too. Great presentation! :D

  • @tarkajedi3331
    @tarkajedi3331 3 роки тому +2

    I am learning these tools to understand and study the Wolfram Physics Model !!!
    I found this video very practical and helpful and am very grateful ! i wish I had this at college!!!
    Here in Australia every kid should be taught this!! It is so good it feels like cheating!
    I am watching everything you have made now!!!

  • @uddhavsurve2974
    @uddhavsurve2974 4 роки тому +1

    Probably the most underrated language

  • @andrewkrock4665
    @andrewkrock4665 7 років тому +4

    Do you happen have the source for the MATLAB toolbox list? Working on a business case for Mathematia and it would be helpful

  • @saurabhtalele1537
    @saurabhtalele1537 5 років тому +4

    Blessings for future .
    Just hat's off for those who are working so hard to bring this on this planet.
    One day its going to become world's best interactive language.
    Because of its very very much like ; the problem is given by teacher and i have just write give data and useful equation.
    This language is like FUTURERASTIC of matlab,python,c++...
    Can you please make some courses on coursera or edx on so all backgrounds of reserchive person get help .
    Awesome👏✊👍

  • @daviddempsey8721
    @daviddempsey8721 Рік тому +1

    A powerful presentation for a powerful product which I’ve enjoyed since it first came out. The “steep learning curve” argument often made is offset by the powerful tools that just do the job and the documentation and executable example library.
    I’m working with teachers to get Stephen and Conrad’s vision to young people. We have to do things differently than the 18th century.

  • @shaguftazareen8953
    @shaguftazareen8953 Рік тому

    Sir, thanks for the much informative video. I want to know the more basic book on Mathematica which has the detail for plot in advance physics.
    thanks

  • @dr.punithavallibabu6088
    @dr.punithavallibabu6088 2 роки тому +1

    Sir kindly solve boundary value problems with more than 3 parameter in ode. For eg momentum and angular momentum equation..

  • @WW-id3cy
    @WW-id3cy 6 років тому +1

    How to calculate curve's involutes in Mathematica Wolfram?

  • @yaminisingh5129
    @yaminisingh5129 5 років тому +1

    Thats pretty cool!!

  • @cleenlivin
    @cleenlivin 3 роки тому

    A great program.

  • @VickyKumar-eq9ux
    @VickyKumar-eq9ux 4 роки тому

    Sir can you explain RK method in mathematics.

  • @oscarg.rodrigueza.1800
    @oscarg.rodrigueza.1800 8 років тому +1

    awesome

  • @saifraaed7834
    @saifraaed7834 7 років тому +1

    thanks

  • @lumpi806
    @lumpi806 5 років тому +1

    What is the software you use ? Thank you. The problem is : everybody talks about wolfram language, BUT I don't know WHERE to find it...

    • @prawtism
      @prawtism 4 роки тому

      Mathematica is the program, it is based on the Wolfram language

  • @vishank7
    @vishank7 3 роки тому

    Man that was cool!

  • @susanavaldemar4232
    @susanavaldemar4232 Рік тому

    Hello good evening, I am trying to solve the following logarithm with wolfram mathematica but I can't get the program to give me a solution: Log2[X = 6] is 64 but I can't get the program to give me that solution, how do I do it as is the syntax that should i put??

  • @leofun01
    @leofun01 Рік тому

    19:40 - like for the programs list.

  • @91722854
    @91722854 7 років тому +1

    what programming software to make mathematica? and what software did they use to create that programming software? just wondering, could someone solve this paradox? thx in advance

    • @ccosborn2000
      @ccosborn2000 7 років тому +1

      Mathematica is written in the Wolfram language. As you watch this video, the code that Jason is using is Wolfram language. Software developers at Wolfram research use the Wolfram language to program new functions (e.g., the new functionality in the upgrade from version 10 to 11). This is the reason that Mathematica can have such impressive new powerful features because the programers use the same function stack as a normal user. In other words, it is not python or C#.

    • @ccosborn2000
      @ccosborn2000 7 років тому +2

      I asked Wolfram and they told me there is a lot of "c" so what I say below is not exactly true

  • @m06oramaUTube
    @m06oramaUTube 7 років тому +1

    Justin Pearson,
    Thanks for a great talk, your "An Introduction to Mathematica and the Wolfram Language for Engineers" on UA-cam.
    I am a newbie with this so it's not really an Engineering question.
    I am fascinated by some of the examples you give: e.g. your "Petunias" table, and also the graph of a web site that went s.t. like this:
    1) Import["www.stephenwolfram.com","Hyperlinks"]
    2) Graph[Flatten[Rest[NestList[Union[Flatten[Thread[#->,Import[#,"Hyperlinks"]]&/@Last/@ #]]&,{""-]>"www.stephenwolfram.com"},2]]]]
    I think I have the syntax right from UA-cam, but I keep getting:
    Syntax::sntxf: "Thread[#->" cannot be followed by ",Import[#,Hyperlinks]]".
    Right now I am using Wolfram on a Raspberry Pi, and I just wanted to know if one needs to have some different access level to Mathematica to resolve this?
    I appreciate you might be busy and it's all right if you can't reply,
    Michael Cook
    m06orama@gmail.com

  • @antejurcevic5855
    @antejurcevic5855 7 років тому +3

    What means expression x[t_] = % [[1,1,2]], at 15:45 ?

    • @666qwertz
      @666qwertz 7 років тому +5

      It gets the last result (that would in this case be x[t]->3/94...) and only shows the right hand side of the rule. The [[1,1]] gets the first element of the list and [[1,1,2]] gets the right hand side of the first element of the list.

    • @666qwertz
      @666qwertz 7 років тому +5

      And the "%" is always the last computated result....

  • @phira360
    @phira360 6 років тому +2

    that last example with concert tickets was pretty extra lol

  • @UnforsakenXII
    @UnforsakenXII 7 років тому +4

    Convinced. **

  • @cybervigilante
    @cybervigilante 3 роки тому +1

    Where is it free? I'm a self-teaching senior on low income and don't see it free anywhere.

  • @antejurcevic5855
    @antejurcevic5855 7 років тому +1

    Can somebody tell me what is the meaning of the symbol % in mathematica

    • @oscarg.rodrigueza.1800
      @oscarg.rodrigueza.1800 6 років тому +1

      in general, it means to apply what you are doing to the last input

    • @dsizov
      @dsizov Рік тому +1

      It is the last result calculated by the kernel.
      In[1]: 2+2
      Out[1]: 4
      In[2]: %-1
      Out[2]: 3

  • @3a146
    @3a146 4 роки тому +1

    Mathematica和Matlab的图标其实在互别苗头啊。一个是离散的高度对称刺球象征符号处理,一个是光滑曲面象征解PDE。

  • @10e999
    @10e999 5 років тому +4

    Doesn't Matlab also have a symbolic solve function?
    Don't get me wrong, I liked the video; but I don't think the example was that impactful.

  • @rameenzulfiqar8959
    @rameenzulfiqar8959 4 роки тому +2

    Sir how to create a list of even number, prime and composite numbers in three different ways

  • @salmiak911
    @salmiak911 6 років тому +1

    Please enable /Subtitles/Transcript/Communtity Translations/ K, Thx

    • @salmiak911
      @salmiak911 6 років тому

      Also you are a tad bit to selly, I'm already sold on the product and don't want to hear about another inferior one all the time.. I came here to learn, not to change my mind..

  • @kalastajanvoima2
    @kalastajanvoima2 6 років тому +3

    I got a new raspberry pi to try this thing out...

  • @bacsti5441
    @bacsti5441 7 років тому +1

    just for more pation you need deep music whene you talk .

  • @benderbendingrofriguez3300
    @benderbendingrofriguez3300 6 років тому +3

    They're obviously not making publicity to an apple product.

  • @thespacemathematics3762
    @thespacemathematics3762 3 роки тому

    wolfram is the best

  • @abramhansen
    @abramhansen 6 років тому +3

    Its free on raspberry pi!

    • @johnc3403
      @johnc3403 5 років тому

      The Raspberry Pi doesn't even have an OS unless you give it one. What do you mean it's free on Raspberry Pi? Is Wolfram desktop linux bundled with Raspbian?

  • @Dua99999Ve
    @Dua99999Ve 7 років тому +2

    Useful but it still only gives you the answer. It doesn't show you how to get the answer.

  • @m06oramaUTube
    @m06oramaUTube 7 років тому +1

    Sorry, Justin - I addressed my question to the wrong person - please ignore my email.

  • @MM-vw1ck
    @MM-vw1ck 3 роки тому

    sin(x)=x
    period

  • @HtS643KyS6555GxQ3edA
    @HtS643KyS6555GxQ3edA 3 роки тому

    It’s tending towards unbridled rage

  • @HtS643KyS6555GxQ3edA
    @HtS643KyS6555GxQ3edA 3 роки тому

    Didn’t it come out in the 90s?

  • @vanoroce64
    @vanoroce64 3 роки тому

    I wouldn't call changing a second order ODE to a first order system of ODEs 'contorting the way you think about the problem' and 'very different than how students see things in their math courses'. In fact, there is much physical insight to be gained by re-writing it this way.
    I think it obscures what is otherwise a very valid point regarding (1) using the right tool for the right job and (2) that there is a trade-off between user friendliness and how much control you have over what is under the hood.
    Also, Matlab has gui tools like simulink and mupad, and it doesnt take much sophistication to write nice wrapper modules that abstract the problem.
    Finally: not everything is as easy as solving ODEs analytically. PDEs, optimization problems, stochastic problems,... they do not have nice, analytical solutions. Students should learn how to harness *both* the power of a general tool like Mathematica *and* a powerful numerical tool like Matlab.

  • @MlSTERSANDMAN
    @MlSTERSANDMAN 4 роки тому +2

    Rage comics in the year 2016 JHC

  • @rock3tcatU233
    @rock3tcatU233 7 років тому +5

    Just use Sagemath, it is open-source and free.

    • @kalastajanvoima2
      @kalastajanvoima2 6 років тому

      eh I tried that one first... if they just fixed the clunkyness of that

  • @thespacemathematics3762
    @thespacemathematics3762 3 роки тому

    i am from bangladesh

  • @Aryeh-o
    @Aryeh-o 5 років тому +1

    this guy 100% doesn't dress like this on the daily

  • @barxco2662
    @barxco2662 2 роки тому

    hahahah add Java and C++ to the list 🤣

  • @andrewmcgraw3188
    @andrewmcgraw3188 6 років тому +1

    and that is why you fail. like the president can't concentrate on stuff.