I took a my one and only psychology course freshman year of highschool. I was a dumb kid, and my teacher wasn't the best at making the content interesting (he had no classes, just made us read a textbook then do quizzes), so you could say I didn't learn a lot. It's been years since then but I've been more hungry for knowledge since I've grown. Your channel has been a great resource: whether I'm trying to study or understand something for college; or for when I'm just trying to relax and need some light but mind-arousing content (like right now!), your channel always has something to get the job done! Thanks for the work that you do, and thanks for helping me keep that spark of learning in my life!
Great intro to psychology, Professor Dave. Looking forward to this series. The modern tools we have today to study brain matter, brain waves, and electrochemical activity in the brain in real time have made psychology a much more meaningful field of study today than, say, even 30 years ago. When I was in college, people who said they were studying psychology for their major were practically laughed it, since it was viewed as something akin to "general studies."
Finally, my area of expertise. There's quite a lot of interesting psychological history you left out, but I understand since we'd be here forever otherwise. You did well here, keep up the good work!
I love how you pronounced Thumoeides, sounds like the name of a sleazy new york banker "ay Thumoeides you controllin' that brain still" "Yeah Tommy i still control da brain, whaddya want from me, eh?"
Oml I just started psychology in school this year and I didn’t like it much but after watching the video I am finding it so fascinating. Looking so forward to this series :)
Not sure but please strive aloft with amplitude: psychology often abided by "reliable pattern recognition", unfortunately after 2007 information became un-intuitive, I would thread carefully, al-trough I could plausible be erroneous. Undesirable information sources pretenses: Autism = Intellectual Psychosis = Unnecessarily aware schizophrenic = "attacked with body controlling hardware" Wish you the best, and hope you don't get constrained by a myriad psychology's flaws.
In the end I think that the mind is the brain, and the brain is the body and if you kill the body, you kill the mind. Great video, i think I'm going to study more psychology in the future.
You're not incorrect, I would like to add that complexity comes when the soul is introduced: as it adheres to it's own fabric of logic, it can still function with just a embedded transmogrify capsule adjacent to chemical feeding however that is a truly dishonorable approach.
Can you explain who Hyman Spotnitz is and what he actually did because I almost never see him get any mentions in my psychology class, despite the fact that he did contribute, majorly to psychoanalysis and group therapy(or is he not as notable as I have read/think)?
It's incorrect to say Ivan Pavlov was a behaviorist. Plavov was a physiologist who studied the digestive system. Classical Conditioning was a serendipitous discovery during that research. Later on, John B. Watson founded Behaviorism, drawing inspiration from Pavlov's results, which showed for the first time that there is an order to learning, not to mention that said results were also empirical and replicable. Watson's Methodological Behaviorism, one of many brands of Behaviorism, for those who care about the difference, was a reaction to the extreme mentalism of the time, which was bogging down psychology with irreplicable results. Kinda like today.
Exactly what I thought, but I was thinking of Skinner. It seems psychology wend from mind woo woo stuff, to actual science around the behaviorists time, back to mind woo woo today. Although since they now study the brain, they kiind of try to make it scientific, but their presumptions and what they focus on is still totally wrong.
.. Alas indeed; Jung tends to be left out of these “fields of psych” descriptions dunn’t he - most of the time - Jung - although reporting from >100yrs ago - describes [in todays language] the bio-psycho-social in an Ecological System setting, perhaps? Well ahead of him time, and still is, really - a visionary! Haha, “The Visionary’s Theorom”..
As far as my knowledge is concerned, Wilhelm Wundt is considered to be the founder of structuralism as he introduced it though I would agree that Titchner made it more popular.
I believe this is an overly simplified view. From what I've heard, although it's not a huge amount, Titchener, as student of Wundt, touted Wundt's views as having been structuralist, although this was not necessarily entirely correct of Titchener. It was more like he was, to some extent, projecting his own views onto Wundt.
I couldn't finish the video, but it was pretty insightful. In basic terms, humans are using reason and logic in order to understand the thing that governs reason and logic. A little counterproductive, if you ask me🤔 Then again what do I know right?😅
I want to change how psychology is seen in the world and get psychologist to change the way they work on their patients. I say this because I been to many psychologist due to mi military trauma and only one has been able to get me to work with him. Hopefully I can bring new ideas to the table once I complete my education in psychology.
Dayum you know you're getting old when you realize you would legit swipe right on portraits of dudes from your textbook like Titchener on a dating app. The beard, the strong jawline, the sensible men's fashion, the academic prowess, oh it is working for me honey yes indeed.
I feel like this was just a brief overview of the history of psychology... It wouldn't surprise me if he gets into more details about that in future videos.
@@WillPhil290 BF skinner is one of two pillar of behaviorism. In that Pavlov's work focused on the stimulus and reaction part of learning, BF skinner focused on the schedule in which learning seems to work best.
Psychology is the way of determining someone inwardly , or the known essence of the living being , from the Greek word psyche translated to English as soul . There are three basic types of characters , the alpha known as positive , the omega as negative , and the combination of both known as neutral , which three of them obey different principles in life . The àggressive governing entity , the rebel that destroy a system known as negative , or the conservative and patient neutral entity 😢
These developed characteristics will lead someone as they obey Thier chosen principle in living to do whatever they want triggered by Thier own faith , with the saying it goes , what is faith without a deed , it's dead , and so someone will execute positive governance and management , or the negative ways of destroying everything , and most good deed of the three which is the neutral character who promote peace , environmental concerns , unity , which are the known ways for true progress ,
I havent watched yet but i usually get disappointed. I am quitte immersed in philosophy. Yet it is nothing like what goes for philosophy. The wondering and pondering. The activity of the brain. No there are philosophy’s that require physical transformation. Physical hard labour . Just “philosiphying gets one no were. Not even complete intelectual understanding.
These days online community obsessed with James Webb Space Telescope, astronomy topics and Parallel Universes. If you can create content with these topics, you will get a lot of likes and followers..
Of course it does. It simply does not qualify as modern psychology. Pre-scientific attempts to explain phenomena now explained by chemistry and physics are also important, they just have to be properly contextualized.
Big pharma and the DSM will make psychology redundant, if not already . Has anyone done research on social economic background in regards labeling and medication.
As someone who literally works for 'big pharma', any accusation of 'control' or discriminatory behavior is not only false, but really stupid. The only people who think like that are the same nutjobs that are the type to accept any and all conspiracy crap.
Creative Uplift: 🤔 To the North East South and West world wide may the Blessing of Heaven continue to shine upon you and yours on this beautiful day of the Lord Jesus Christ ❣️ and God 2024. So mote it be ✝️. Amen 🙏. RQQ ✨👍✨. So mote it be ✝️.
Sorry dude, you've just entered a long list of 'scientists who should stay away from history'. While some of this video is superficially correct on the idea (occasionally) there is no way you can describe anything anyone did before the mid 19th century as psychology. It simply wasn't. Not conceptually, practically or philosophically. Leave history to the historians, and we promise we won't do stuff on chemistry.
Yeah, and I didn't call it psychology, as I clearly demarcated philosophy and psychology. Also, this was written by a psychologist, so take your baseless flex elsewhere, sweetie.
Dr. Rich, who is going to write the history of chemistry? According to your "brilliant" insight, no one. It turns out the history of chemistry is being written by chemists with some passion for history. Only chemists can describe the history of their discipline. How can your hypothetical "historian" possibly write it without understanding the science?
Like many disciplines, meaning of "psychology" has changed over time. In regards to the origins of psychology this video has a very basic commonly accepted overview of how philosophical study of mind eventually was differentiated into a separate (social?) science discipline. What exactly was wrong in any of the content?
It's very funny that this criticism entirely hinges on an issue that was completely resolved literally three minutes in. Besides, this kind of academic gatekeeping has always been a vile poison upon the profession.
If Sigmund freud were talk with Greek psychologist. He would consider them inferior. But if he would have talk with Buddhist philosopher. He would have been impressed
I took a my one and only psychology course freshman year of highschool. I was a dumb kid, and my teacher wasn't the best at making the content interesting (he had no classes, just made us read a textbook then do quizzes), so you could say I didn't learn a lot. It's been years since then but I've been more hungry for knowledge since I've grown.
Your channel has been a great resource: whether I'm trying to study or understand something for college; or for when I'm just trying to relax and need some light but mind-arousing content (like right now!), your channel always has something to get the job done! Thanks for the work that you do, and thanks for helping me keep that spark of learning in my life!
Thank you for sharing thoughts
Great intro to psychology, Professor Dave. Looking forward to this series. The modern tools we have today to study brain matter, brain waves, and electrochemical activity in the brain in real time have made psychology a much more meaningful field of study today than, say, even 30 years ago. When I was in college, people who said they were studying psychology for their major were practically laughed it, since it was viewed as something akin to "general studies."
dang this guy knows A LOT about the science stuff
He does research
@@younggod5230 0:00
He knows about about the science stufffff😂😂😂😂😂 that's why he explains
True 😂
He has hundreds of experts writing scripts for him
I love this video. I do this class for my GCSE and A-level students even though the curriculum doesn't make me. Your video is a fantastic resource!
Finally, my area of expertise. There's quite a lot of interesting psychological history you left out, but I understand since we'd be here forever otherwise. You did well here, keep up the good work!
Lmao who are you?
@@itchyfungus8481Who the fuck is that guy😂
This channel is slowly turning into an encyclopedia
And i'm here for it lol, better than any school systems that i've ever had
Perfect for Psychology students! Thank you, professor Dave!
I love how you pronounced Thumoeides, sounds like the name of a sleazy new york banker
"ay Thumoeides you controllin' that brain still"
"Yeah Tommy i still control da brain, whaddya want from me, eh?"
😂
I don’t think I’ve ever met Pavlov but his name rings a bell
Good one
excelent!
🤤
😏🙂↔️🥴
Underrated 😂
I am really grateful to you Sir for the subject taken up for discussion.
Oml I just started psychology in school this year and I didn’t like it much but after watching the video I am finding it so fascinating. Looking so forward to this series :)
Not sure but please strive aloft with amplitude: psychology often abided by "reliable pattern recognition", unfortunately after 2007 information became un-intuitive, I would thread carefully, al-trough I could plausible be erroneous.
Undesirable information sources pretenses: Autism = Intellectual Psychosis = Unnecessarily aware schizophrenic = "attacked with body controlling hardware" Wish you the best, and hope you don't get constrained by a myriad psychology's flaws.
I’m thoroughly enjoying this series. Thank you.
Thanks for watching...thanks for information us!
Well done Sir...
In the end I think that the mind is the brain, and the brain is the body and if you kill the body, you kill the mind.
Great video, i think I'm going to study more psychology in the future.
You're not incorrect, I would like to add that complexity comes when the soul is introduced: as it adheres to it's own fabric of logic, it can still function with just a embedded transmogrify capsule adjacent to chemical feeding however that is a truly dishonorable approach.
watched from Myanmar , presentation is so good, thank you so much
hello professor dave your video really helped me in deeper understanding the basics. thank you soooooo much. love from india
Simply described... Thank you🙏
Can you explain who Hyman Spotnitz is and what he actually did because I almost never see him get any mentions in my psychology class, despite the fact that he did contribute, majorly to psychoanalysis and group therapy(or is he not as notable as I have read/think)?
Love your Chanel...Keep up the good work! Maybe you can make a Video about the history of the 'inquisition'? Greetings from germany
I think you should mention about Lev Vygotsky also. He was a great psychologist.
I heard about him mainly in my developmental psychology class (how we change and grow over the life span).
It's incorrect to say Ivan Pavlov was a behaviorist. Plavov was a physiologist who studied the digestive system. Classical Conditioning was a serendipitous discovery during that research. Later on, John B. Watson founded Behaviorism, drawing inspiration from Pavlov's results, which showed for the first time that there is an order to learning, not to mention that said results were also empirical and replicable. Watson's Methodological Behaviorism, one of many brands of Behaviorism, for those who care about the difference, was a reaction to the extreme mentalism of the time, which was bogging down psychology with irreplicable results. Kinda like today.
Exactly what I thought, but I was thinking of Skinner. It seems psychology wend from mind woo woo stuff, to actual science around the behaviorists time, back to mind woo woo today.
Although since they now study the brain, they kiind of try to make it scientific, but their presumptions and what they focus on is still totally wrong.
Thank you professor ❤
Thank you Doctor Betty, for your good Language courses please.
I can't get over the fact that the philosophy guy was named Play-Doh
No way you didnt talk about Carl Jung
.. Alas indeed; Jung tends to be left out of these “fields of psych” descriptions dunn’t he - most of the time - Jung - although reporting from >100yrs ago - describes [in todays language] the bio-psycho-social in an Ecological System setting, perhaps? Well ahead of him time, and still is, really - a visionary!
Haha, “The Visionary’s Theorom”..
As far as my knowledge is concerned, Wilhelm Wundt is considered to be the founder of structuralism as he introduced it though I would agree that Titchner made it more popular.
I believe this is an overly simplified view. From what I've heard, although it's not a huge amount, Titchener, as student of Wundt, touted Wundt's views as having been structuralist, although this was not necessarily entirely correct of Titchener. It was more like he was, to some extent, projecting his own views onto Wundt.
I couldn't finish the video, but it was pretty insightful. In basic terms, humans are using reason and logic in order to understand the thing that governs reason and logic. A little counterproductive, if you ask me🤔
Then again what do I know right?😅
I want to change how psychology is seen in the world and get psychologist to change the way they work on their patients. I say this because I been to many psychologist due to mi military trauma and only one has been able to get me to work with him. Hopefully I can bring new ideas to the table once I complete my education in psychology.
Thanks for this wonderful information 😊😊
Dayum you know you're getting old when you realize you would legit swipe right on portraits of dudes from your textbook like Titchener on a dating app. The beard, the strong jawline, the sensible men's fashion, the academic prowess, oh it is working for me honey yes indeed.
Well done. I teach Intro and explain it in a similar way, without the graphics. Haha. I'll fold this in the mix for students. Keep it up.
Thank you, Professor Jesus!
Very informative!
Hey Dave, will you ever do a course on Philosophy?
Yes it's coming soon!
Great explanation
The real ones came here for a psychology test
I bet every time Pavlov heard a bell he would think of feeding his dogs.
The mind operates in past and future while the body is always in present.
Thank you for this video
Can you explain about Ayurveda pseudoscience?
I got a dumb question.
Can you instantly debunk flat Earth with only one sentence?
Gravity exists.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Gravity is a very good point but they could pull something out of their ass to explain it
@@BunnyJolf but even that pulling would only be possible through gravity LMAO
Daveeeey
This is very helpful
Can you provide us with some notes regarding psychology?
I can't beieve you left out BF skinner.
I feel like this was just a brief overview of the history of psychology... It wouldn't surprise me if he gets into more details about that in future videos.
@@WillPhil290 BF skinner is one of two pillar of behaviorism. In that Pavlov's work focused on the stimulus and reaction part of learning, BF skinner focused on the schedule in which learning seems to work best.
@@donchon7580 He'll probably mention him when he covers behaviorism more in depth.
Sir I have questions..are the plato or Aristotle consider psychology as a soul?
Professor Dave you my nigga!
Psychology is the way of determining someone inwardly , or the known essence of the living being , from the Greek word psyche translated to English as soul . There are three basic types of characters , the alpha known as positive , the omega as negative , and the combination of both known as neutral , which three of them obey different principles in life . The àggressive governing entity , the rebel that destroy a system known as negative , or the conservative and patient neutral entity 😢
thank you so muchh, very helpful
For functionalism you should have mentioned ma boy William James
Dave, do you plan on doing a music theory playlist? What about like some piano fundamentals, since you’re an excellent musician?
I will indeed do that!
Kind of a big jump from Plato to Descartes, were there really no notable ideas in those 2000s yrs?
A brief history.
Ah shit I accidently watched a newly released video and now I can't binge the whole series...
Did plato have a pavlovian response when hearing someone ponder existence??
thank u for teach us
Bravo ❤
Thanks
It's very helpful
These developed characteristics will lead someone as they obey Thier chosen principle in living to do whatever they want triggered by Thier own faith , with the saying it goes , what is faith without a deed , it's dead , and so someone will execute positive governance and management , or the negative ways of destroying everything , and most good deed of the three which is the neutral character who promote peace , environmental concerns , unity , which are the known ways for true progress ,
Hey prof. Are you really an encyclopedia? How do you teach so many subjects? Not just one
I was half beginning to think he would mention Sherlock Holmes.
Awesome, bc I’ve been trying to watch Jordan Peterson lately.
Me here🤩🤯
00:53
Soulcology
Thank s
Freud....he was a great man
I think his mum would probably disagree.
I havent watched yet but i usually get disappointed. I am quitte immersed in philosophy. Yet it is nothing like what goes for philosophy. The wondering and pondering. The activity of the brain. No there are philosophy’s that require physical transformation. Physical hard labour . Just “philosiphying gets one no were. Not even complete intelectual understanding.
the stuff about the unconscious mind influencing behaviour explains why homophobic people always take the day off work to attend gay events
These days online community obsessed with James Webb Space Telescope, astronomy topics and Parallel Universes. If you can create content with these topics, you will get a lot of likes and followers..
ok
He's already got 45 videos on Astronomy/Astrophysics and 27 videos on Modern Physics.
shut up
I think you mistook Philosophy for Psychology. What Rene Descartes questioned does not have importance in Psychology.
Of course it does. It simply does not qualify as modern psychology. Pre-scientific attempts to explain phenomena now explained by chemistry and physics are also important, they just have to be properly contextualized.
thanks professor jesus
Why you did not add anything about Muslim philosopher?
❤
Ooo seems like a lot of work is still needed to be done.. psychology is not fully developed
@awopeturonke
This is fantastic lecture from Prof Dave. i look forward to reading the series.
Shiiiiiiit intro 😂
First here 😂
very early
Daca vrei sa fi liber nu te încrede în psihologie si ceea ce este scris !
algorithm comment
How are there only 65 comments w 1.76 million subs …
Big pharma and the DSM will make psychology redundant, if not already .
Has anyone done research on social economic background in regards labeling and medication.
What you have just said is utterly meaningless.
Please, don't bring Big pharma bullcrap here. Do it only on your pseudoscientific forums.
As someone who literally works for 'big pharma', any accusation of 'control' or discriminatory behavior is not only false, but really stupid. The only people who think like that are the same nutjobs that are the type to accept any and all conspiracy crap.
What does this even mean?
Creative Uplift: 🤔 To the North East South and West world wide may the Blessing of Heaven continue to shine upon you and yours on this beautiful day of the Lord Jesus Christ ❣️ and God 2024. So mote it be ✝️. Amen 🙏. RQQ ✨👍✨. So mote it be ✝️.
Sorry dude, you've just entered a long list of 'scientists who should stay away from history'. While some of this video is superficially correct on the idea (occasionally) there is no way you can describe anything anyone did before the mid 19th century as psychology. It simply wasn't. Not conceptually, practically or philosophically.
Leave history to the historians, and we promise we won't do stuff on chemistry.
Yeah, and I didn't call it psychology, as I clearly demarcated philosophy and psychology. Also, this was written by a psychologist, so take your baseless flex elsewhere, sweetie.
Dr. Rich, who is going to write the history of chemistry? According to your "brilliant" insight, no one. It turns out the history of chemistry is being written by chemists with some passion for history. Only chemists can describe the history of their discipline. How can your hypothetical "historian" possibly write it without understanding the science?
Like many disciplines, meaning of "psychology" has changed over time. In regards to the origins of psychology this video has a very basic commonly accepted overview of how philosophical study of mind eventually was differentiated into a separate (social?) science discipline. What exactly was wrong in any of the content?
It's very funny that this criticism entirely hinges on an issue that was completely resolved literally three minutes in.
Besides, this kind of academic gatekeeping has always been a vile poison upon the profession.
seek help
Is this guy smart I can't tell
If Sigmund freud were talk with Greek psychologist. He would consider them inferior. But if he would have talk with Buddhist philosopher. He would have been impressed
Getting ready for finals anyone? 🥲
Buddhist philosophy is better than Greek philosophy
Greek philosophy is inferior to Indian philosophy