those who are meant to walk the right path will find the truth even in 100 of lies,, those who are meant to go astray will be blind folded even if the truth knocks the face
Maashallah, subhanallah. May Allah preserve his work, and his contributions till the end. And may allah swt grant him highest abodes of jannah and forgive him.
This is what I infer from the speech: _If Dr. Zakir Naik says, things written in Vedas are true ( as you have to believe it completely for part of it to be true ) ... and Dr. Naik believes Allah SWT in Vedas, and Muhammad PBUH is the prophet_ *Do we Muslims agree Allah SWT ﷺ is God in the Vedas and Muhammad PBUH is a prophet of God?* I have started reading Vedas now and Dr. Naik seems true. Allah Bless You All.
It can be interpreted as that the Vedas prophesied about Muhammad (SAW) so it means there must be some Nabi behind Hinduism but its important to note that each and every past scriptures sent by God were corrupted by the people... So believing that part of Vedas is true not all of it... The part that aligns with the Quran is alright but the rest isn't
@cctt1785 Much pf what you daid can be debated but lets not get into that... Now even if we accepted everything you said no matter how delusional it might be, it still doesn't disprove my point rather proves it. My point was that Hinduism is a result of some Prophet's religion being highly tempered by people. And all these similarities that you counted proves my point that that Prophet was also a Muslim whose practices are to this day seen in the indian culture. Ps* Shiva was never worshiped at Kaaba. The Moon literally has nothing to do with Islam and its symbols, do your research 💀
You will find many Hindus accept Islam. But the Sikhs, who were Hindus you will find in stern opposition to Islam, who say the Mughals in India were forcibly converting Hindus into Muslims. If this is the case, then it goes against what Allah has mentioned in the Qur'an: There is no compulsion in the religion.
The only reason this confuses me is because Hinduism is not regarded as a religion brought from Allah nor are they considered people of the book. How could the prophet’s (pbuh) coming be prophesied in scriptures by Hindu characters of whom don’t have any mention in Islam?
First off you do know that Allah(s.w) has sent messengers to all nations right? I mean it says in the Quran that there is no nation that we haven't sent a Warner or a messenger. It is also mentioned in the Quran that not all messengers are mentioned in the Quran. To Generalize, we don't know if the original Hindusim was brought by Allah(s.w) through a messenger or if it is a religion created by humans, but this doesn't mean that there is no chance that it falls among the religions like Christianty and Judaism(religions that were originally from Allah(s.w) but later on become corrupted)
Since there's only One God, so all scripture is His word coming through a Prophet. However, throughout history, followers of Prophets used to make changes to the teachings after them. Over time, the religion of God would transform and people would forget Oneness. This is why when God's religion was finally perfected with the 124,000th and last Prophet, Muhammad (pbuh), Shirk was kept as the MOST sensitive issue because it was the core reason behind people's lack of respect for previous revelations of scripture. Even today, Islam is the only truly monotheistic religion because of the importance placed on Tawheed, which is actually the core message in ALL religions until humans add associates with God.. Moreover, psychology today has proved how Oneness is not just a belief, it is a deep psychic fact, programming, and need. Carl Jung devoted his life to this inner journey towards Tawheed that he calls Individuation and compares it to Alchemy.
I'd like to add, there is research taking place that tentatively suggests that Hazrat Nuh (AS) may have been the Prophet whose followers are now known as Hindus. There is a Hadith, and it's also in the Quran (as far as I can recall), that on judgement day the followers of Hazrat Nuh (AS) will be the only ones who will deny having received a Prophet. This is currently true. Hindus assert that their guidance came through various sources, they don't believe in Prophets. It implies that the original message was completely obscured. During his 950 years of life, Hazrat Nuh (AS) only had a handful of followers. It's understandable that he was forgotten, but the word survived in some shape and form. Hindus do believe in the One God, but they don't mind associating the relatively smaller gods with God, and don't mind worshipping them or asking them for help. It seems harmless, but in Islam it is a major issue with severe psychology and spiritual consequences as there can only ever be One Centre. That's why we must always be firmly rooted in the One Centre for psychospiritual stability.
@@AliAldawood-z9wthink of it this way. A person once was hunting a deer. He shot the deer with an arrow at his feet to weaken it and then he killed it. He told his son this story. The son told him son that his grandfather shot down a deer and instantly killed it. Next generation gets told he killed the deer by punching with his mere hands. Next generation gets told he didn't even use hands but a mere whisper. Next generation gets told he didn't kill a deer but he killed an elephant. Next generation gets told he killed a dragon. Yeah u get it...
If you read a story and if i will ask you who is the father of the main role of that story. Obviously you will pick just the name..not the whole story or context..so picking up father's name,mothers name, birth place is not called cherry picking...
Nope. Only bad peoples who don't understand their religion. Atheist is also a religion where they believe anything can be idolized (celebrities, cars, penthouse, mount, etc.)
ChatGPT translation “The Sanskrit phrase “महामद इति ख्यात” translates to “known as Mahamad” or “reputed as Mahamad” in English. This phrase is used to indicate that someone is known or reputed by a certain name or title, in this case, Mahamad.”
@@faisal35i92 I don't have to type them here, kindly visit Dharma Speaks Channel on UA-cam. The person have debunked all misinterpretation and misconceptions of Zakir Naik on Hindu scriptures. Hare Krishna 🕊️
Shaikh Zakir Naik saab we miss you here alot. May Allah give you more strength and courage . To deliberate truth through various scriptures. Your dawee work will continue we pray for your future and health. Ameen
Brother pls don't follow him. There are many good Sufi masters who will truly guide u. He just making u intolerant of other religions. Islam is a peaceful religion and journey through self discipline and love.
so your logic is 99% of what written in hindu scriptures are wrong and fake and not words from god..but the part where they mention about prophet is true..is it something like that?
No bro there were many prophets that came before Prophet Muhammad and I believe that this book was also a book revealed to prophet but it was corrupted by mankind
How did the “god” in Hinduism or the “being” that they worship know and write that a prophet called muhammed will be the last messenger and his dads name Will be Abdullah and all the other prophecies 2500 BC even tough that the Hindu scriptures aren’t the word of god . How was this “being” very specific . How are Muslims happy that Muhammed is found in the Hindu scriptures and the prophecy in the Hindu scriptures about prophet Muhammad actually happened, doesn’t this show that the Hindu scriptures are the word of a “being” that knows the future, as it was wrote even before Muhammed was born. Shouldn’t us as Muslims try to deny the fact that the person they’re taking about in the prophecy isn’t Muhammed to show that the prophecy wasn’t fulfilled and the “being” that wrote the Hindu scriptures isn’t all knowing and doesn’t know the future and that Islam is the true word of god. And if our excuse as Muslims is that it was a coincidence, aren’t we making double standards, Because In the Quran and ahadith there are some prophecies that were said such as the construction of large buildings before the day of resurrection, people can say this was also a coincidence and everything else was a coincidence. Why should we say that the 100 verses in the Hindu scriptures talking about muhammed were a coincidence, even though we can say that the prophecies made by Allah and prophet Muhammed were also a coincidence. I just want to strengthen my iman, so please I want a logical and relevant answer
yeah people like zakir naik and ahmed deedat may allah grand him janat al firdous, have a computer in ther minds, the brain is a a hardrive, they make no mistake by memorizing the verses and they have answer to all questions!
Why you always busy in hindusisam rather then islam. You are a great influencer you should help those Muslims who are dying of hunger in afganistan, Syria, sudan ,Yemen Muslims are homeless Force to prostitution you should help those rather then wasting your time in comparing other religion.
O ruler these delighting sources these forces these juices of herbs satisfy of you in the slaughter of enemies. O protector of good men whereby you courageously give the ten thousand in comparable riches This is the correct translation he use misguiding everyone ved never said about Mohammad this guy is wrong
Sabarimalai Sastha - Hindu God 6 Sabarimalai Sastha or Ayyapa is a sylvan god worshipped by the credulous Hindus of Kerala and Tamil Nadu in India. He is the son born to Siva and Vishnu as a result of a homosexual act. To escape from the curse of the powerful demon Durwasa, all the gods joined together and churned the milky ocean to gather “Amrut”-a butter-like ambrosia. They collected the “Amrut” in a pot, and kept it to be served at a heavenly feast. An Asura (demon) from the nether world stole the pot of ” Amrut from Develoka. When the loss of the ambrosia was detected, the omniscient Vishnu was able to know where it was. He went to the nether world in the guise of Mohini, a woman of exquisite beauty, and brought and back the “Amrut” and served it to the gods. When Mohini was serving the Amrut, Shiva got intoxicated with her beauty and had sexual intercourse with her, who was in reality Vishnu. Vishnu became pregnant as a result of the homosexual act, and gave birth to Sastha from his thigh. Both Shiva and Vishnu discarded this un-naturally born illegitimate child in the forests of Sabarimalai in Kerala. Jagannath - Hindu God 7 Jagannath is the god enshrined in the famous Hindu temple at Puri. Sankarachariya, the spiritual head of the present Hindus of India, is the devotee of Jagannath of Puri. Hundreds of measures of rice and dal are cooked here daily to feed the thousands of worshippers. At the Jaya-Vijiya gate of this temple various type of sexual orgies of the god Jagannath can be seen sculptured on granite stones. On the outer walls of this temple are life-size sculptures of the 64 types of sexual mating of men and women as described in the Kamasutra of Vatsyayana. The dance Bhajan in this temple begins after 10 p.m each day behind closed doors. It is performed by one of the 120 dancing girls in the service of the temple. Each night a new dancing girl will have to come to the temple to dance before god Jaganath. This dance is witnessed only by the lifeless statue of Jagnnath and the Brahmin priest who plays on the musical instrument. As the dance heightens to a crescendo, the girl discards her dress and dances stark naked. She then throws herself to the statue of Jagannath in an ecstasy shouting “O Lord, I am thy bride, please make love with me”. Whether it is the lifeless idol of Jagannath or the living Brahmin priest who makes love with her is not known (It is strictly forbidden for Non-Hindus to enter the Jagannatha temple). Dancing girls who have retired form the service of god Jagannath are now making both ends meet by leading a life of prostitution in the streets of holy Puri. Their patrons are the worshippers who come in their thousands to the sacred city. Final Conclusion In reality none of these gods exist or ever existed. They are the products of mental fantasies of some surrealistic creative thinkers of the past. Even today there are mentally deranged persons indulging in creating new gods. All the amorous stores connected with these gods also are the subjective creations of sex-starved surrealistic thinkers obsessed with sexual thoughts. satan million bhagwan
@@betruthfulalwayspeace579 i don't need to. You can directly identify the bigotry and Hinduphobia represented in these statements. No need to verse quote from Puranas and drop temples and historical events here.
@@betruthfulalwayspeace579 and if you indeed want proof you can always go to those temples, read our scriptures properly, ask genuine scholars and study Hindu philosophy, iconography and theology. This person above taken Puranic sources too literally and added his own misinterpretation to represent Hinduism in a bad way.
Blatant lie many books were edited during Cresent rule. But still there are actual versions of hindu scriptures who are non edited there is nothing like what he's mentioning in them
People actually believe this nonsense. IF this is true, which is not, but let’s say it’s true .. then Shiva is Allah. I don’t think that Shiva would said in that time: oh people there will be a last prophet coming but he will arrive 5000 years later.
It’s such a long shot trying to link translations of two words that mean the same thing. “Praise worthy” is so generic that it could be applied to any saint not just Mohammad. Regardless, respect for all religions. 🙏
The fact that it described the population of Mekkah exactly as 60,000 is not convincing for you brother? if you dont want to believe then don't believe! But don't say that he is wrong or incorrect unless you can tell people what the truth is
The name "Mohammed" was a first in Arabia and was previously unheard of. The fact that we have scriptures from all around the world- whether it be Vegas or song of songs in old testament- that prophecies a prophet of God who will be known as The praise worthy ( literally the exact translation of the name Mohammed) is very convincing. The quotations in the Vedas are not an isolated case.
Concept of God in Hinduism books 📚 1) rigveda book 1, hymn 164, verse 46 "The truth is one and the God is only one 📖" 2) Chandoya upanishad 📖 chapter 6, section 2, verse 1 "Akam avidityam,God is only one without second" 3) ridveda book 📖10, hymn 114, verse 4 "The God is only one but,God has many names 4) Rigveda book 📖8,hymn 1,verse 1 "God is only one and only worship of God " 5)Sevetasvatara upanishad 📖 chapter 6, verse 9 "God has no father and no mother and no son and no daughter and no wife and parents" 6)Sevatasatara upanishad 📖 chapter 4,verse 20 "No one seen the God" 7)sri bhagwat gita 📖 chapter 10,verse 3 "God is not born and God has no beginning and i am the God of all" 8.sevetasatara upanishad 📖chapter 4, verse 19 "naa tasya pratima asti " there is no image or idol (statue) of God and no shape of God 9) Yajur veda 📖 chapter 32,verse 3 "naa tasya pratima asti" there is no image or idol (statue) of God and no shape of God " 10) Yajur veda 📖 chapter 40, verse 8 "God is formless and pure and no one like the God and God is not like human " 11) Yajur veda 📖 chapter 40, verse 9 " those peoples do worship natural elements they all are going in the hell and those peoples worship idols (statue) and man made things they all are going in the darkness " 12) Sri bhagwat gita 📖 chapter 7,verse 20 " "Those whose intelligence has been stolen by material desires surrender unto demigods and follow the particular rules and regulations of worship according to their own natures." [Bhagavad Gita 7:20] The Gita states that people who are materialistic worship demigods i.e. ‘gods’ besides the True God. 13) brahma sutras" ekam brahmm,dvitaya naste nen ne naste kinchan" There is only one God, not the second and not at all,not in least bit "
rigveda bk 1 hymn 164 verse 46 this verse describes there is one truth but people call it by different names like indra, agni etc and forms like garuda with wings verse They call him Indra, Mitra, Varuṇa, Agni, and he is heavenly nobly-winged Garutmān. To what is One, sages give many a title they call it Agni, Yama, Mātariśvan. reference - www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv01164.htm 2] chandogya upanishad chap 6 section 2 verse 1. In this verse there is no word like god at all just lke thre was not any in earlier one. this verse states when there was nothing there was one without a second. without a second because there was nothing except it. verse - . Somya, before this world was manifest there was only existence, one without a second. On this subject, some maintain that before this world was manifest there was only non-existence, one without a second. Out of that non-existence, existence emerged. this verse instead of supporting islamic idea it oppose islam idea of creation out of nothing and it basically says there was existence when there was seemingly nothing. reference - www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/chandogya-upanishad-english/d/doc239260.html 3] rigveda bk 10 hymn 114 verse 4 is nowhere close to what you quote yoour verse seems to be in line with chap 1 hymn 164 verse 46 verse - One of these Birds hath passed into the sea of air: thence he looks round and views this universal world. With simple heart I have beheld him from anear: his Mother kisses him and he returns her kiss. ref - www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10114.htm 4] rigveda bk 8 hymn 1 verse 1 says nothing like what you mention. the verse is about indra which is one of the vedic deities who rules heaven, thunder and rain. verse GLORIFY naught besides, O friends; so shall no sorrow trouble you. Praise only mighty Indra when the juice is shed, and say your lauds repeatedly this verse talks about some practice to be done when juice is shed. This verse is probably for some ritual which when practiced we should praise indra. there is no such thing as you have written to be. ref - www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv08001.htm 5] svetosvara upanishad chap 6 verse 9 verse - He has no master in the world, no ruler, nor is there even a sign of Him by which He can be inferred. He is the cause, the Lord of the lord of the organs; and He is without progenitor or controller. where did you get wife, son and daughter in this verse ? ref - www.esamskriti.com/e/Spirituality/Upanishads-Commentary/Svetasvatara-Upanishad-~-Chap-6-The-One-God-and-the-Cosmic-Process-1.aspx 6] svetosvara upanishad chap 4 verse 20 verse - His form is not an object of vision; no one beholds Him with the eyes. They who, through pure intellect and the Knowledge of Unity based upon reflection, realize Him as abiding in the heart become immortal. yes it says noone beholds with eye but here eye refers to a normal eyes. All hindus agree we can see god by divine eyes not normal eyes and if you read bhagvat gita you will realise sri krishna gave arjuna diviine eyes so that he can let arjuna see his original form obviously even in that he stated that his form is innumerable and arjuna didnot saw his true potecy hence noone sees him with eyes. his true potency is beyond seeing but one can see him where he acquire divine eyes and even in that he will not see him in its true potency. ref -www.esamskriti.com/e/Spirituality/Upanishads-Commentary/Svetasvatara-Upanishad-~-Chap-4-The-One-God-of-the-Manifold-World-3.aspx 7] bhagvat gita chap 10 verse 3 just to let you know bhagvat gita is spoken by lord krishna so if you quote this verse are you accepting krishna as god ? verse He who knows Me-the birth-less, the beginning-less, and the great Lord of the worlds, he, the undeluded one among mortals, becomes freed from all sins. we all know god is without beginning. ref - bhagavadgita.io/chapter/10/verse/3/ 8] sevetasatara upanishad 📖chapter 4, verse 19 Here pratima is wrongly translated as idolthe real translation is likeness why ? because at first it describes noone can catch hold of him because of his vastness and later even it says it as mahad yasah which is sanskrit word of vastness hence here the word for pratima according to context is likeness which signifies there is noone as vast as him. verse No one can catch hold of Him either from above, or across, or in the middle. There is no likeness of Him. His name is Great Glory (Mahad Yasah). ref -www.esamskriti.com/e/Spirituality/Upanishads-Commentary/Svetasvatara-Upanishad-~-Chap-4-The-One-God-of-the-Manifold-World-3.aspx 9] same goes for yajur veda 32.3 the word used here is pratima which again to context bcoz of reasons i mentioned above is likeness and not idol] verse -He has no equivalence, (because) he is verily vast or his glory is verily great (नाम महाद्यशः), and is praised as Hiranyagarva, yasmann jata, and as Maa Maa Hinsit. hiranyagarva and yasman jata etc all words signifies vastness. to understand why translation is such please refer to link below ref - thehinduforum.com/index.php?threads/na-tasya-pratima-asti-yajurveda-32-3-misquoted.1224/ 10] this verse in no way talks about or says word god it instead talks about a self realised or enlightened bein who attains a state of bright, bodyless, sineless, pure state. verse He hath attained unto the Bright, Bodiless, Woundless, Sinewless, the Pure which evil hath not pierced. Far-sighted, wise, encompassing, he self-existent hath prescribed aims, as propriety demands, unto the everlasting Years.He hath attained unto the Bright, Bodiless, Woundless, Sinewless, the Pure which evil hath not pierced. Far-sighted, wise, encompassing, he self-existent hath prescribed aims, as propriety demands, unto the everlasting Years. www.sacred-texts.com/hin/wyv/wyvbk40.htm the words he has attained and earlier passages clearly clarifies it talks about enlightened soul. 11) Yajur veda chapter 40, verse 9 the sentence revolves around sambhuti and ashumbuti meaning which if you read in context of later verses says peopld pay respect to both sambhuti and asambhuti and obviously the meaning of both sambhuti and asambhuti is completely different from what you quoted.] real meaning -Enter into the darkness those (fools) who engage into the activities of destruction (by creating conflict based on ideology, likes, race or origin), yet enter into greater darkness those who engage into (selfish ) the lust of material gatherings. Or Enter into the darkness those who renounce the world or disregard this material existence but yet enter into more darkness those who deeply indulge into material lust. to study in detail manner please refer below holyvedas.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/yajurveda-40-9-misquoted/#:~:text=Skip%20to%20content-,Yajurveda%2040.9%20Misquoted,How%20they%20misquote%20this%20mantra%3F 12) Sri bhagwat gita chapter 7,verse 20 verse is completly wrong and it in no way prohibit worshipping other deities just reading with context clarifies that VERSE 20 People, deprived of their wisdom by desires for various objects and guided by their own nature, resort to other deities following the relevant methods. VERSE 21 Whichever form (of a deity) any devotee wants to worship with faith, that very firm faith of his I strengthen. VERSE 22 Being imbued with that faith, that person engages in worshipping that form, and he gets those very desired results therefrom as they are dispensed by Me alone. VERSE 23 That result of theirs who are of poor intellect is indeed limited. The worshippers of gods go to the gods. My devotees go to Me alone. these verses clearly states that which ever form and deity we worship that faith of our krishna strengthen and likewise people get temporary benefits from demigods but not permanent. ref - bhagavadgita.io/chapter/7/?page=4 13] verse of bhrama sutras is nowhere to be found but just to let you know brahma sutras talk about monism a concept which states just like earth, air are nothing but matter and energy likewise the whole universe is essentially a primordial entity called brahman. probably this is the concept you are giving quotation about.
Ok man liya tum ne udar sabko chutya banaya aur vo ban bhi gai tum ne kaha islam aur Hinduism me similarly he aur apke mahumad bhi mentioned he to Hinduism islam se purana he to accept karlo Hinduism
السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ. . Hadith of the day ﷽. ___________________________________ It was narrated from Ibn Abi Sa'eed Al-Khudri (RA) that his father said: "I passed by the Prophet (peace be upon him) when he was performing Wudu' from the well of Buda'ah. I said: 'Are you performing Wudu' from it when garbage is thrown into it?' He said: 'Water is not made impure by anything.'" (Sunan an-Nasa'i, Book 2, Hadith 3) "We take water for granted as a purifying and purified source. We feel thirsty, it can be quenched by this natural blessing from Allah. Alhamdulillah for water which we use to wash ourselves and prepare for Salah." __________ Nabi صلى الله عليه وسلمSaid,"If anyone recites Surah Kahf on Friday,a light will shine brightly for him till the next Friday." (Tirmidhi)
Later, in the form of a ghostly presence, the expert illusionist Mahamada appeared at night in front of King Bhojaraja and said: "O King, your religion is of course known as the best religion among all. Still, by the order of the Lord, I am going to establish a terrible and demoniac religion and enforce a strong creed over the meat-eaters [mlecchas]. My followers will be known by their cut [circumcised] genitals, they will have no shikha [tuft of hair on their head, like Brahmanas], but will have a beard, make noise loudly (azaan), and eat all kinds of animals except swine without observing any rituals. They will perform purificatory acts with the musala, and thus be called musalman, and not purify their things with kusha grass [one of the Vedic customs]. Thus, I will be the originator of this adharmic [opposed to Vedic or Aryan Dharma] and demoniac religion of the meat-eating nations." After having heard all this, the Bhavishya Purana goes on to relate that King Bhojaraja returned to his land and palace, and that ghost of the man also went back to his own place. Bhavishya Purana verses 10-27 Wth does this mean? Why does it depict Muhammad peace be upon him a bad person?
I read this book and the verse you quoted is not available but even if its available we all know Your scriptures are corrupted 😂 Here in bhagwatam chp 12 verse 32 it says "Chasing Her like a mad bull going for a female, the semen was discharged of him who never spills his semen in vain." What kind of godly scripture is this
@@servantof_allah it is available and it’s the truth Also zakir quotes the Hindu scriptures and believes them as the truth as u have just seen. The funny part is he cherry picked and only told u the smallest part of it Not the actual truth about Mohammad the deceiver Even the gnostic texts that were just discovered 2000 years old states that your god is a lower god who created this universe This universe has evil in it That creator was very jealous of the true God so he said to everyone worship me Only me If u worship any Other God u will go to hell. Why would God be afraid of u worshipping someone else? Because allah isn’t God God would never be jealous. It shows that iblis was actual one who loved God He gave the knowledge of good and evil So Adam and Eve could see allah was evil What kind of God wouldn’t want u to know what’s good and evil Clearly an evil god would They have a word for your leader creator It’s called the demiurge Allah is the demiurge Waheguru is the true one God above all made of pure uncreated light
@@servantof_allah why would I need to cope when I know the truth. U keep listening to the deceiver We literally prophecized when he would come What he would do And how evil he was There are parts of ur religion that are true but overall u have been deceived cuz u don’t know God I bet you’re so triggered by facts u couldn’t finish my last comment
@@servantof_allah I literally disproved your religion with logic and proof And with a sign from God Cuz how else is the purana written 1000s of years ago going to be able to predict everything about Mohammed and his evils Mohammed was literally so evil. That he didn’t know the difference between an Angel and a demon That’s why Mohammed spoke what u call the “ satanic verses” The knowledge of good and evil isn’t bad I pray you reach gnosis and The true God saves you Not the creator of the universe the one true God Brahman Waheguru
@Hari OM Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "When the people of Paradise will enter Paradise and the people of Hell will go to Hell, Allah will order those who have had faith equal to the weight of a grain of mustard seed to be taken out from Hell. So they will be taken out but (by then) they will be blackened (charred). Then they will be put in the river of Haya' (rain) or Hayat (life) (the Narrator is in doubt as to which is the right term), and they will revive like a grain that grows near the bank of a flood channel. Don't you see that it comes out yellow and twisted" Sahih Bukhari (Belief) Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 22 Yes He will go to Jannah but after severe punishment which you can never imagine of. So Before committing manor sins think that you will be burnt like a charcoal before entering Jannah.
@@AdDehlawi 23 years may bani Quran ki ek bhi 6000 say jada aayats 114 surahs may 1. yog 2. ayurveda 3. jyotish 4. vaastav 5. sangeet 6. dharm 7. Artha 8. kama 9. Moksha 10. atman 11. brahman kay baray may kahi bhi likha Honga....tho mein Islam Muslim banay ko tyaar hu.......
In Bhavisya Purana III.3.3.5-27 Stated that a person called MUHAMADA and he supposed be a BLESSED person , and he is from NOWHERE.... his deeds are of the devils, he is a great illutionist, he said to the king: your God is my servent eventhough your religion is the best, i will create a horrible religion touched by the devil, and my follower will be those who circumcised, short hair but bearded, bad mannered, noisy when fighting, eat everything and they wil be called the MUSALMAN..
Zakir bhaijan matlab kuch bhi bakte ho. Veda ek tha, around 6000 saal pehele vedon ko char parts kiya gaya Ved Vyasa ke dwara us samay to Prophet Muhammad nahi the. Haan ye ho sakta hai ki Vedon ka Indra hi Quran ka Prophet Muhammad ho. Narasamsa ka aap jo Sandhi biched kar rahe hai wo elementary Sanskrit grammatical rule ke bahar hai. Sorry bhaijaan Sanskrit is most scientific language in the world aur ye koi bachchon ka khel nahin hain jo aap koi bhi maanle apne man se.
@@Shap0o.PlayZz The Sanskrit phrase “महामद इति ख्यात” translates to “known as Mahamad” or “reputed as Mahamad” in English. This phrase is used to indicate that someone is known or reputed by a certain name or title, in this case, Mahamad.
he learned and studied all religions, yet choose Islam, this says something that a lot hate to admit
Hes actually very uneducated, and creates hes own joy. These are all debunked!
@@IzlamDeztroyer keep crying little jealous pagan incel
In fact it says the opposite!
those who are meant to walk the right path will find the truth even in 100 of lies,, those who are meant to go astray will be blind folded even if the truth knocks the face
Prophet muhammad mentioned as Narashangsa in :
Rigveda bk.1 hymn 13 v.3
Rigveda bk.1 hymn 18 v.9
Rigveda bk.1 hymn 106 v.4
Rigveda bk.1 hymn 142 v.3
Rigveda bk.2 hymn 3 v.2
Rigveda bk.5 hymn 5 v.2
Rigveda bk.7 hymn 2 v.2
Rigveda bk.10 hymn 64 v.3
Yajurveda ch.21 v.31
Yajurveda ch.21 v.55
Yajurveda ch.20 v.37
Yajurveda ch.20 v.57
Yajurveda ch.28 v.2
Yajurveda ch.28 v.19
Yajurveda ch.28 v.42
Maashallah, subhanallah. May Allah preserve his work, and his contributions till the end. And may allah swt grant him highest abodes of jannah and forgive him.
Ma Sha Allah.😍
Correction: At 0:50, he refers to verse 7, but he wanted to refer to verse 9, where the 20 chiefs are mentionned and the 60 099 are mentionned
60099 is still 3 x 6 in symboysm which we are told are the anti christ
So you believe there is some thing written there in your book right 😁
This is what I infer from the speech:
_If Dr. Zakir Naik says, things written in Vedas are true ( as you have to believe it completely for part of it to be true ) ... and Dr. Naik believes Allah SWT in Vedas, and Muhammad PBUH is the prophet_
*Do we Muslims agree Allah SWT ﷺ is God in the Vedas and Muhammad PBUH is a prophet of God?*
I have started reading Vedas now and Dr. Naik seems true.
Allah Bless You All.
It can be interpreted as that the Vedas prophesied about Muhammad (SAW) so it means there must be some Nabi behind Hinduism but its important to note that each and every past scriptures sent by God were corrupted by the people... So believing that part of Vedas is true not all of it... The part that aligns with the Quran is alright but the rest isn't
@@arsitayyab2208 Yeah, I think the same...
@@arsitayyab2208 Agree
@cctt1785 i didnt get your point
@cctt1785 Much pf what you daid can be debated but lets not get into that... Now even if we accepted everything you said no matter how delusional it might be, it still doesn't disprove my point rather proves it. My point was that Hinduism is a result of some Prophet's religion being highly tempered by people. And all these similarities that you counted proves my point that that Prophet was also a Muslim whose practices are to this day seen in the indian culture. Ps* Shiva was never worshiped at Kaaba. The Moon literally has nothing to do with Islam and its symbols, do your research 💀
You will find many Hindus accept Islam. But the Sikhs, who were Hindus you will find in stern opposition to Islam, who say the Mughals in India were forcibly converting Hindus into Muslims. If this is the case, then it goes against what Allah has mentioned in the Qur'an: There is no compulsion in the religion.
كل خير من فضل الله تعالى 🤍
"I know this man, the end of greatness"
Subhanallah
We looove Dr Zakir the hero 🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺
The only reason this confuses me is because Hinduism is not regarded as a religion brought from Allah nor are they considered people of the book. How could the prophet’s (pbuh) coming be prophesied in scriptures by Hindu characters of whom don’t have any mention in Islam?
First off you do know that Allah(s.w) has sent messengers to all nations right? I mean it says in the Quran that there is no nation that we haven't sent a Warner or a messenger. It is also mentioned in the Quran that not all messengers are mentioned in the Quran. To Generalize, we don't know if the original Hindusim was brought by Allah(s.w) through a messenger or if it is a religion created by humans, but this doesn't mean that there is no chance that it falls among the religions like Christianty and Judaism(religions that were originally from Allah(s.w) but later on become corrupted)
Since there's only One God, so all scripture is His word coming through a Prophet. However, throughout history, followers of Prophets used to make changes to the teachings after them. Over time, the religion of God would transform and people would forget Oneness. This is why when God's religion was finally perfected with the 124,000th and last Prophet, Muhammad (pbuh), Shirk was kept as the MOST sensitive issue because it was the core reason behind people's lack of respect for previous revelations of scripture.
Even today, Islam is the only truly monotheistic religion because of the importance placed on Tawheed, which is actually the core message in ALL religions until humans add associates with God.. Moreover, psychology today has proved how Oneness is not just a belief, it is a deep psychic fact, programming, and need. Carl Jung devoted his life to this inner journey towards Tawheed that he calls Individuation and compares it to Alchemy.
I'd like to add, there is research taking place that tentatively suggests that Hazrat Nuh (AS) may have been the Prophet whose followers are now known as Hindus. There is a Hadith, and it's also in the Quran (as far as I can recall), that on judgement day the followers of Hazrat Nuh (AS) will be the only ones who will deny having received a Prophet. This is currently true. Hindus assert that their guidance came through various sources, they don't believe in Prophets. It implies that the original message was completely obscured. During his 950 years of life, Hazrat Nuh (AS) only had a handful of followers. It's understandable that he was forgotten, but the word survived in some shape and form. Hindus do believe in the One God, but they don't mind associating the relatively smaller gods with God, and don't mind worshipping them or asking them for help. It seems harmless, but in Islam it is a major issue with severe psychology and spiritual consequences as there can only ever be One Centre. That's why we must always be firmly rooted in the One Centre for psychospiritual stability.
@@SBGillani Could the holy books really be changed to such an extent that it goes from one god to 330 million
@@AliAldawood-z9wthink of it this way. A person once was hunting a deer. He shot the deer with an arrow at his feet to weaken it and then he killed it. He told his son this story. The son told him son that his grandfather shot down a deer and instantly killed it. Next generation gets told he killed the deer by punching with his mere hands. Next generation gets told he didn't even use hands but a mere whisper. Next generation gets told he didn't kill a deer but he killed an elephant. Next generation gets told he killed a dragon. Yeah u get it...
Right I really found the truth
Muhammad will hv zakir by his side after judgement ...forever & ever & ever....ever
Please do lie. Mohamed is not in any Dharmic scripture.
*Hindus, tell me, where did Shiva, Vishnu, Ram, Khrishna say, i am god, worshipp me and my companions?*
In Bhagavad Gita, Shiv purana, Vishnu purana
@@rhinosorusAny reference
Very smartly omitted the rest of the story on discription os Shambhala or place of the last avtar..m amazing cherry picking on just the words. 👍👍
No bro, Dr. Zakir Naik says Allah SWT ﷺ is the God in Vedas and Muhammad PBUH is a prophet of God. Quran is a byproduct.
If you read a story and if i will ask you who is the father of the main role of that story. Obviously you will pick just the name..not the whole story or context..so picking up father's name,mothers name, birth place is not called cherry picking...
I started reviewing the first quote, and its obviously a hymn to Lord Indra. Unrealiable.
Religion separates human
Nope. Only bad peoples who don't understand their religion. Atheist is also a religion where they believe anything can be idolized (celebrities, cars, penthouse, mount, etc.)
The best Day with goods deeds Dr Zakir Niker..
Maaha Allah
Burkha kidar hai tumhara
ChatGPT translation “The Sanskrit phrase “महामद इति ख्यात” translates to “known as Mahamad” or “reputed as Mahamad” in English. This phrase is used to indicate that someone is known or reputed by a certain name or title, in this case, Mahamad.”
I love you Dr. Zakir Naik...I always try to become like YOU
Me too
ssins hhh
We all American Muslims love you Dr. Naik from Colorado United States of America.
I also believe only one Eshwar nirakar
Oh bhai don't be a woke liberal
Don't fool ur self
Subhan Allah! Salaams for you Dr. Zakir!! May Almighty Allah Subhan wa Ta'ala bless us all with similar belief strengthening speaker like you!!!
Muhammad. Peace be upon us all , inspite of him...is found in every writing of all religion. Even in caveman rock art.
All translation is wrong ..
Vedas wrote down 100 thousands years ago......how he is compared that......making everything from his side.
True
Go read the books yourself 🤣
Written by who and written in what medium?
2 things are clear, he doesnt know vedas nor sanskrit..
Prophet Muhammad was nowhere mentioned in the Vedas
Dr.Zakir Naik is a walking miracle, don't these disbelievers see?
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂
We "disbelievers" see the opposite of miracle from this person.
@@TharsyanJaderuby lol he used the scripture you believe in to prove his point, why are you so ignorant
@@TharsyanJaderuby can you debunk his claims then??
@@faisal35i92 I don't have to type them here, kindly visit Dharma Speaks Channel on UA-cam. The person have debunked all misinterpretation and misconceptions of Zakir Naik on Hindu scriptures.
Hare Krishna 🕊️
As God reserves a very special place for muhamad, zakir wil be beside to have fully all they deserve
How can anyone imagine that this man is a man of God ?
Flat earthers don't use their intellectual ability, they just follow what their sky books and idiots like him tell them to.
He is a human being (homosapien)created by God Almighty..and gave him knowledge to tell the ppl truth about Ellohim.
Shaikh Zakir Naik saab we miss you here alot. May Allah give you more strength and courage . To deliberate truth through various scriptures. Your dawee work will continue we pray for your future and health. Ameen
Brother pls don't follow him. There are many good Sufi masters who will truly guide u. He just making u intolerant of other religions. Islam is a peaceful religion and journey through self discipline and love.
@@Ramraj-rx6py there is no sets in islam... Unfortunately some scholars make sets... Islam is only one
I 💙 DR ZAKIR NAIK 👍🏻
KOOF to your Pentragram TRAITOR
Atharvaveda Bk. 20 Hymn 21 V. 6
2:54 that's a ginger indian wow
1:30 sushrama means dilligent worker not one who prays
so your logic is 99% of what written in hindu scriptures are wrong and fake and not words from god..but the part where they mention about prophet is true..is it something like that?
No bro there were many prophets that came before Prophet Muhammad and I believe that this book was also a book revealed to prophet but it was corrupted by mankind
@@Babbu-Jee Ok bro.then what if quran also corrupted by mankind too?for you info,in vedas they not mentioned about Prophet Muhammad.
can you please give the dates from when islam started..the dates approx dates..no hypothetical dates please.
Islam is there since coming of first human
@@blackdot226 so who came first? islam or first human?
@@SagarSagar-ro3fj islam means who follow commandments of Allah
First human Adam sa followed it so islam is there since human existence
@Zugitage Allah is in 7th sky 😂 Muhammad was a illiterate guy & u trying to give us knowledge 😂😂
Adam peace be upon him was a Muslim - one who submits to god
How did the “god” in Hinduism or the “being” that they worship know and write that a prophet called muhammed will be the last messenger and his dads name
Will be Abdullah and all the other prophecies 2500 BC even tough that the Hindu scriptures aren’t the word of god . How was this “being” very specific . How are Muslims happy that Muhammed is found in the Hindu scriptures and the prophecy in the Hindu scriptures about prophet Muhammad actually happened, doesn’t this show that the Hindu scriptures are the word of a “being” that knows the future, as it was wrote even before Muhammed was born. Shouldn’t us as Muslims try to deny the fact that the person they’re taking about in the prophecy isn’t Muhammed to show that the prophecy wasn’t fulfilled and the “being” that wrote the Hindu scriptures isn’t all knowing and doesn’t know the future and that Islam is the true word of god. And if our excuse as Muslims is that it was a coincidence, aren’t we making double standards, Because In the Quran and ahadith there are some prophecies that were said such as the construction of large buildings before the day of resurrection, people can say this was also a coincidence and everything else was a coincidence. Why should we say that the 100 verses in the Hindu scriptures talking about muhammed were a coincidence, even though we can say that the prophecies made by Allah and prophet Muhammed were also a coincidence. I just want to strengthen my iman, so please I want a logical and relevant answer
yeah people like zakir naik and ahmed deedat may allah grand him janat al firdous, have a computer in ther minds, the brain is a a hardrive, they make no mistake by memorizing the verses and they have answer to all questions!
Zakir Naik is a fantastic spin doctor.
ALLAH AKBAR ALLAH AKBAR
Why you always busy in hindusisam rather then islam. You are a great influencer you should help those Muslims who are dying of hunger in afganistan, Syria, sudan ,Yemen Muslims are homeless Force to prostitution you should help those rather then wasting your time in comparing other religion.
wow
We all should preach Islam like Dr. Muhammad Zakir Nayek
Very nice video thank you
He's talking nonsense.
Hindu scripture will not revere a stupid prophet 😀😀
Its not muhammad Dr. its "mahaamad" it has its own meaning in sanskrit. You are lying here again as usual.
O ruler these delighting sources these forces these juices of herbs satisfy of you in the slaughter of enemies. O protector of good men whereby you courageously give the ten thousand in comparable riches
This is the correct translation he use misguiding everyone ved never said about Mohammad this guy is wrong
Sabarimalai Sastha - Hindu God 6
Sabarimalai Sastha or Ayyapa is a sylvan god worshipped by the credulous Hindus of Kerala and Tamil Nadu in India. He is the son born to Siva and Vishnu as a result of a homosexual act.
To escape from the curse of the powerful demon Durwasa, all the gods joined together and churned the milky ocean to gather “Amrut”-a butter-like ambrosia. They collected the “Amrut” in a pot, and kept it to be served at a heavenly feast. An Asura (demon) from the nether world stole the pot of ” Amrut from Develoka. When the loss of the ambrosia was detected, the omniscient Vishnu was able to know where it was. He went to the nether world in the guise of Mohini, a woman of exquisite beauty, and brought and back the “Amrut” and served it to the gods. When Mohini was serving the Amrut, Shiva got intoxicated with her beauty and had sexual intercourse with her, who was in reality Vishnu. Vishnu became pregnant as a result of the homosexual act, and gave birth to Sastha from his thigh. Both Shiva and Vishnu discarded this un-naturally born illegitimate child in the forests of Sabarimalai in Kerala.
Jagannath - Hindu God 7
Jagannath is the god enshrined in the famous Hindu temple at Puri. Sankarachariya, the spiritual head of the present Hindus of India, is the devotee of Jagannath of Puri. Hundreds of measures of rice and dal are cooked here daily to feed the thousands of worshippers.
At the Jaya-Vijiya gate of this temple various type of sexual orgies of the god Jagannath can be seen sculptured on granite stones. On the outer walls of this temple are life-size sculptures of the 64 types of sexual mating of men and women as described in the Kamasutra of Vatsyayana.
The dance Bhajan in this temple begins after 10 p.m each day behind closed doors. It is performed by one of the 120 dancing girls in the service of the temple. Each night a new dancing girl will have to come to the temple to dance before god Jaganath. This dance is witnessed only by the lifeless statue of Jagnnath and the Brahmin priest who plays on the musical instrument.
As the dance heightens to a crescendo, the girl discards her dress and dances stark naked. She then throws herself to the statue of Jagannath in an ecstasy shouting “O Lord, I am thy bride, please make love with me”.
Whether it is the lifeless idol of Jagannath or the living Brahmin priest who makes love with her is not known (It is strictly forbidden for Non-Hindus to enter the Jagannatha temple).
Dancing girls who have retired form the service of god Jagannath are now making both ends meet by leading a life of prostitution in the streets of holy Puri. Their patrons are the worshippers who come in their thousands to the sacred city.
Final Conclusion
In reality none of these gods exist or ever existed. They are the products of mental fantasies of some surrealistic creative thinkers of the past. Even today there are mentally deranged persons indulging in creating new gods. All the amorous stores connected with these gods also are the subjective creations of sex-starved surrealistic thinkers obsessed with sexual thoughts.
satan million bhagwan
Lol no.
There's a lot of misinterpretations in your statements. So stop spreading false information.
@@TharsyanJaderuby prove it please.
@@betruthfulalwayspeace579 i don't need to. You can directly identify the bigotry and Hinduphobia represented in these statements. No need to verse quote from Puranas and drop temples and historical events here.
@@betruthfulalwayspeace579 and if you indeed want proof you can always go to those temples, read our scriptures properly, ask genuine scholars and study Hindu philosophy, iconography and theology.
This person above taken Puranic sources too literally and added his own misinterpretation to represent Hinduism in a bad way.
Blatant lie many books were edited during Cresent rule. But still there are actual versions of hindu scriptures who are non edited there is nothing like what he's mentioning in them
People actually believe this nonsense. IF this is true, which is not, but let’s say it’s true .. then Shiva is Allah. I don’t think that Shiva would said in that time: oh people there will be a last prophet coming but he will arrive 5000 years later.
Muhammad is last prophet
It’s such a long shot trying to link translations of two words that mean the same thing. “Praise worthy” is so generic that it could be applied to any saint not just Mohammad. Regardless, respect for all religions. 🙏
The fact that it described the population of Mekkah exactly as 60,000 is not convincing for you brother? if you dont want to believe then don't believe! But don't say that he is wrong or incorrect unless you can tell people what the truth is
The name "Mohammed" was a first in Arabia and was previously unheard of. The fact that we have scriptures from all around the world- whether it be Vegas or song of songs in old testament- that prophecies a prophet of God who will be known as The praise worthy ( literally the exact translation of the name Mohammed) is very convincing.
The quotations in the Vedas are not an isolated case.
Concept of God in Hinduism books 📚
1) rigveda book 1, hymn 164, verse 46
"The truth is one and the God is only one 📖"
2) Chandoya upanishad 📖 chapter 6, section 2, verse 1
"Akam avidityam,God is only one without second"
3) ridveda book 📖10, hymn 114, verse 4
"The God is only one but,God has many names
4) Rigveda book 📖8,hymn 1,verse 1
"God is only one and only worship of God "
5)Sevetasvatara upanishad 📖 chapter 6, verse 9
"God has no father and no mother and no son and no daughter and no wife and parents"
6)Sevatasatara upanishad 📖 chapter 4,verse 20
"No one seen the God"
7)sri bhagwat gita 📖 chapter 10,verse 3
"God is not born and God has no beginning and i am the God of all"
8.sevetasatara upanishad 📖chapter 4, verse 19 "naa tasya pratima asti " there is no image or idol (statue) of God and no shape of God
9) Yajur veda 📖 chapter 32,verse 3 "naa tasya pratima asti" there is no image or idol (statue) of God and no shape of God "
10) Yajur veda 📖 chapter 40, verse 8 "God is formless and pure and no one like the God and God is not like human "
11) Yajur veda 📖 chapter 40, verse 9 " those peoples do worship natural elements they all are going in the hell and those peoples worship idols (statue) and man made things they all are going in the darkness "
12) Sri bhagwat gita 📖 chapter 7,verse 20 "
"Those whose intelligence has been stolen by material desires surrender unto demigods and follow the particular rules and regulations of worship according to their own natures."
[Bhagavad Gita 7:20]
The Gita states that people who are materialistic worship demigods i.e. ‘gods’ besides the True God.
13) brahma sutras" ekam brahmm,dvitaya naste nen ne naste kinchan" There is only one God, not the second and not at all,not in least bit "
rigveda bk 1 hymn 164 verse 46
this verse describes there is one truth but people call it by different names like indra, agni etc and forms like garuda with wings
verse
They call him Indra, Mitra, Varuṇa, Agni, and he is heavenly nobly-winged Garutmān.
To what is One, sages give many a title they call it Agni, Yama, Mātariśvan.
reference - www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv01164.htm
2] chandogya upanishad chap 6 section 2 verse 1. In this verse there is no word like god at all just lke thre was not any in earlier one. this verse states when there was nothing there was one without a second.
without a second because there was nothing except it.
verse -
. Somya, before this world was manifest there was only existence, one without a second. On this subject, some maintain that before this world was manifest there was only non-existence, one without a second. Out of that non-existence, existence emerged.
this verse instead of supporting islamic idea it oppose islam idea of creation out of nothing and it basically says there was existence when there was seemingly nothing.
reference - www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/chandogya-upanishad-english/d/doc239260.html
3] rigveda bk 10 hymn 114 verse 4 is nowhere close to what you quote yoour verse seems to be in line with chap 1 hymn 164 verse 46
verse -
One of these Birds hath passed into the sea of air: thence he looks round and views this universal world.
With simple heart I have beheld him from anear: his Mother kisses him and he returns her kiss.
ref - www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10114.htm
4] rigveda bk 8 hymn 1 verse 1 says nothing like what you mention. the verse is about indra which is one of the vedic deities who rules heaven, thunder and rain.
verse
GLORIFY naught besides, O friends; so shall no sorrow trouble you.
Praise only mighty Indra when the juice is shed, and say your lauds repeatedly
this verse talks about some practice to be done when juice is shed. This verse is probably for some ritual which when practiced we should praise indra.
there is no such thing as you have written to be.
ref - www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv08001.htm
5] svetosvara upanishad chap 6 verse 9
verse -
He has no master in the world, no ruler, nor is there even a sign of Him by which He can be inferred. He is the cause, the Lord of the lord of the organs; and He is without progenitor or controller.
where did you get wife, son and daughter in this verse ?
ref - www.esamskriti.com/e/Spirituality/Upanishads-Commentary/Svetasvatara-Upanishad-~-Chap-6-The-One-God-and-the-Cosmic-Process-1.aspx
6] svetosvara upanishad chap 4 verse 20
verse -
His form is not an object of vision; no one beholds Him with the eyes. They who, through pure intellect and the Knowledge of Unity based upon reflection, realize Him as abiding in the heart become immortal.
yes it says noone beholds with eye but here eye refers to a normal eyes. All hindus agree we can see god by divine eyes not normal eyes and if you read bhagvat gita you will realise sri krishna gave arjuna diviine eyes so that he can let arjuna see his original form obviously even in that he stated that his form is innumerable and arjuna didnot saw his true potecy hence noone sees him with eyes.
his true potency is beyond seeing but one can see him where he acquire divine eyes and even in that he will not see him in its true potency.
ref -www.esamskriti.com/e/Spirituality/Upanishads-Commentary/Svetasvatara-Upanishad-~-Chap-4-The-One-God-of-the-Manifold-World-3.aspx
7] bhagvat gita chap 10 verse 3
just to let you know bhagvat gita is spoken by lord krishna so if you quote this verse are you accepting krishna as god ?
verse
He who knows Me-the birth-less, the beginning-less, and the great Lord of the worlds, he, the undeluded one among mortals, becomes freed from all sins.
we all know god is without beginning.
ref - bhagavadgita.io/chapter/10/verse/3/
8] sevetasatara upanishad 📖chapter 4, verse 19
Here pratima is wrongly translated as idolthe real translation is likeness why ?
because at first it describes noone can catch hold of him because of his vastness and later even it says it as mahad yasah which is sanskrit word of vastness hence here the word for pratima according to context is likeness which signifies there is noone as vast as him.
verse
No one can catch hold of Him either from above, or across, or in the middle. There is no likeness of Him. His name is Great Glory (Mahad Yasah).
ref -www.esamskriti.com/e/Spirituality/Upanishads-Commentary/Svetasvatara-Upanishad-~-Chap-4-The-One-God-of-the-Manifold-World-3.aspx
9] same goes for yajur veda 32.3 the word used here is pratima which again to context bcoz of reasons i mentioned above is likeness and not idol]
verse -He has no equivalence, (because) he is verily vast or his glory is verily great (नाम महाद्यशः), and is praised as Hiranyagarva, yasmann jata, and as Maa Maa Hinsit.
hiranyagarva and yasman jata etc all words signifies vastness.
to understand why translation is such please refer to link below
ref - thehinduforum.com/index.php?threads/na-tasya-pratima-asti-yajurveda-32-3-misquoted.1224/
10] this verse in no way talks about or says word god it instead talks about a self realised or enlightened bein who attains a state of bright, bodyless, sineless, pure state.
verse
He hath attained unto the Bright, Bodiless, Woundless,
Sinewless, the Pure which evil hath not pierced.
Far-sighted, wise, encompassing, he self-existent hath
prescribed aims, as propriety demands, unto the
everlasting Years.He hath attained unto the Bright, Bodiless, Woundless,
Sinewless, the Pure which evil hath not pierced.
Far-sighted, wise, encompassing, he self-existent hath
prescribed aims, as propriety demands, unto the
everlasting Years.
www.sacred-texts.com/hin/wyv/wyvbk40.htm
the words he has attained and earlier passages clearly clarifies it talks about enlightened soul.
11) Yajur veda chapter 40, verse 9
the sentence revolves around sambhuti and ashumbuti meaning which if you read in context of later verses says peopld pay respect to both sambhuti and asambhuti and obviously the meaning of both sambhuti and asambhuti is completely different from what you quoted.]
real meaning -Enter into the darkness those (fools) who engage into the activities of destruction (by creating conflict based on ideology, likes, race or origin), yet enter into greater darkness those who engage into (selfish ) the lust of material gatherings.
Or
Enter into the darkness those who renounce the world or disregard this material existence but yet enter into more darkness those who deeply indulge into material lust.
to study in detail manner please refer below
holyvedas.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/yajurveda-40-9-misquoted/#:~:text=Skip%20to%20content-,Yajurveda%2040.9%20Misquoted,How%20they%20misquote%20this%20mantra%3F
12) Sri bhagwat gita chapter 7,verse 20
verse is completly wrong and it in no way prohibit worshipping other deities
just reading with context clarifies that
VERSE 20
People, deprived of their wisdom by desires for various objects and guided by their own nature, resort to other deities following the relevant methods.
VERSE 21
Whichever form (of a deity) any devotee wants to worship with faith, that very firm faith of his I strengthen.
VERSE 22
Being imbued with that faith, that person engages in worshipping that form, and he gets those very desired results therefrom as they are dispensed by Me alone.
VERSE 23
That result of theirs who are of poor intellect is indeed limited. The worshippers of gods go to the gods. My devotees go to Me alone.
these verses clearly states that which ever form and deity we worship that faith of our krishna strengthen and likewise people get temporary benefits from demigods but not permanent.
ref - bhagavadgita.io/chapter/7/?page=4
13] verse of bhrama sutras is nowhere to be found but just to let you know brahma sutras talk about monism a concept which states just like earth, air are nothing but matter and energy likewise the whole universe is essentially a primordial entity called brahman.
probably this is the concept you are giving quotation about.
Narshansa was KING PARIKSHIT .
He clearly doesn't know vedic Sanskrit, Zakir Naik is embarrassing.
Then go teach him the proper Vedic Sanskrit, may you guide him to the Truth
a very very wrong information
How
Ok man liya tum ne udar sabko chutya banaya aur vo ban bhi gai tum ne kaha islam aur Hinduism me similarly he aur apke mahumad bhi mentioned he to Hinduism islam se purana he to accept karlo Hinduism
Bhai Quran is the last Book 📕 of God!!!
السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ. .
Hadith of the day
﷽.
___________________________________
It was narrated from Ibn Abi Sa'eed Al-Khudri (RA) that his father said: "I passed by the Prophet (peace be upon him) when he was performing Wudu' from the well of Buda'ah. I said: 'Are you performing Wudu' from it when garbage is thrown into it?' He said: 'Water is not made impure by anything.'"
(Sunan an-Nasa'i, Book 2, Hadith 3)
"We take water for granted as a purifying and purified source. We feel thirsty, it can be quenched by this natural blessing from Allah. Alhamdulillah for water which we use to wash ourselves and prepare for Salah."
__________
Nabi صلى الله عليه وسلمSaid,"If anyone recites Surah Kahf on Friday,a light will shine brightly for him till the next Friday."
(Tirmidhi)
Jai ho poppat mohaabat ki
Gay PeeRe Ram
Sir apky lecture urdu m nh h kiya
Hlo sir
I M from indian occupied kashmir
Yaa we know sanatan dharma is the prime dharma all others are derived from it
.
...
..
..................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
.....................................................................................
..................................................................
....................................................
.........................................
..............................
.......................
..................
...........
......
....
..
.
Zombies...
The liar forever 😂
Do research
@@hashirjaved757 did researched...😅
@@sivasiddhi942 you are the liar
@@sivasiddhi942 he researched while drinking cow pee
But he provided sources man!!!!
This man did more harm than good to us Muslim people. So many people recruited through him.
Yeh banda sirf numbers fainkta rehta hai😂😂😂
salaam zakir naik, to prophet of GOD was Vedas revealed ?
Later, in the form of a ghostly presence, the expert illusionist Mahamada appeared at night in front of King Bhojaraja and said: "O King, your religion is of course known as the best religion among all. Still, by the order of the Lord, I am going to establish a terrible and demoniac religion and enforce a strong creed over the meat-eaters [mlecchas]. My followers will be known by their cut [circumcised] genitals, they will have no shikha [tuft of hair on their head, like Brahmanas], but will have a beard, make noise loudly (azaan), and eat all kinds of animals except swine without observing any rituals. They will perform purificatory acts with the musala, and thus be called musalman, and not purify their things with kusha grass [one of the Vedic customs]. Thus, I will be the originator of this adharmic [opposed to Vedic or Aryan Dharma] and demoniac religion of the meat-eating nations." After having heard all this, the Bhavishya Purana goes on to relate that King Bhojaraja returned to his land and palace, and that ghost of the man also went back to his own place.
Bhavishya Purana verses 10-27
Wth does this mean? Why does it depict Muhammad peace be upon him a bad person?
I read this book and the verse you quoted is not available but even if its available we all know Your scriptures are corrupted 😂
Here in bhagwatam chp 12 verse 32 it says
"Chasing Her like a mad bull going for a female, the semen was discharged of him who never spills his semen in vain."
What kind of godly scripture is this
@@servantof_allah it is available and it’s the truth
Also zakir quotes the Hindu scriptures and believes them as the truth as u have just seen.
The funny part is he cherry picked and only told u the smallest part of it
Not the actual truth about Mohammad the deceiver
Even the gnostic texts that were just discovered 2000 years old states that your god is a lower god who created this universe
This universe has evil in it
That creator was very jealous of the true God so he said to everyone worship me
Only me
If u worship any
Other God u will go to hell.
Why would God be afraid of u worshipping someone else?
Because allah isn’t God
God would never be jealous.
It shows that iblis was actual one who loved God
He gave the knowledge of good and evil
So Adam and Eve could see allah was evil
What kind of God wouldn’t want u to know what’s good and evil
Clearly an evil god would
They have a word for your leader creator
It’s called the demiurge
Allah is the demiurge
Waheguru is the true one God above all made of pure uncreated light
@@Gs9sk cope 😂
@@servantof_allah why would I need to cope when I know the truth.
U keep listening to the deceiver
We literally prophecized when he would come
What he would do
And how evil he was
There are parts of ur religion that are true but overall u have been deceived cuz u don’t know God
I bet you’re so triggered by facts u couldn’t finish my last comment
@@servantof_allah I literally disproved your religion with logic and proof
And with a sign from God
Cuz how else is the purana written 1000s of years ago going to be able to predict everything about Mohammed and his evils
Mohammed was literally so evil. That he didn’t know the difference between an Angel and a demon
That’s why Mohammed spoke what u call the “ satanic verses”
The knowledge of good and evil isn’t bad I pray you reach gnosis and The true God saves you
Not the creator of the universe the one true God
Brahman Waheguru
My no by by
Kya zhoot baat hai ye Vedas aur Quran iska koi comparison nahi hai totally different hai.
Jab Quotation de rkha hai toh book le k check kar le.
@Hari Om Islamophobic detected. Do you understand English?
@Hari OM
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "When the people of Paradise will enter Paradise and the people of Hell will go to Hell, Allah will order those who have had faith equal to the weight of a grain of mustard seed to be taken out from Hell. So they will be taken out but (by then) they will be blackened (charred). Then they will be put in the river of Haya' (rain) or Hayat (life) (the Narrator is in doubt as to which is the right term), and they will revive like a grain that grows near the bank of a flood channel. Don't you see that it comes out yellow and twisted"
Sahih Bukhari
(Belief)
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 22
Yes He will go to Jannah but after severe punishment which you can never imagine of. So Before committing manor sins think that you will be burnt like a charcoal before entering Jannah.
Bhai pahale Vedas padh ke toh aa fir boliyo
@@AdDehlawi
23 years may bani Quran ki ek bhi 6000 say jada aayats 114 surahs may
1. yog
2. ayurveda
3. jyotish
4. vaastav
5. sangeet
6. dharm
7. Artha
8. kama
9. Moksha
10. atman
11. brahman
kay baray may kahi bhi likha Honga....tho mein Islam Muslim banay ko tyaar hu.......
lie is tool of muslims 😄 sometimes they fine name of mohammad in bible and sometimes in other books😄
Ahaan another non believer
Every soul will taste death. And We test you with evil and with good as trial, and to Us you will be returned.
Surah: Al-Anbiya (35)..
Good think Good think Why are you wasting space with your other accounts
abbigail abbigail
love love
Sujilchandramohan Mohan
Samy Samy
Soul never dies!
-bhagvadgeeta
@@ANONYMOUS-it1ku sould never die body is
- bhagavad gita
.
.
.
Great
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼.
Sir Plz Tell me Kai Ham Jihaad kr rhai hai
Salam ALLAH AKBAR
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼.
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼:
Jaza Kallaho Khayran brother Zakir
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼?
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼
In Bhavisya Purana III.3.3.5-27 Stated that a person called MUHAMADA and he supposed be a BLESSED person , and he is from NOWHERE.... his deeds are of the devils, he is a great illutionist, he said to the king: your God is my servent eventhough your religion is the best, i will create a horrible religion touched by the devil, and my follower will be those who circumcised, short hair but bearded, bad mannered, noisy when fighting, eat everything and they wil be called the MUSALMAN..
Wait isn't Hinduism never believe In demon and angel?
🙂🙃🙂🙃🙂🙃
🙂🙃🙃🙂🙂🙃🙂
Zakir bhaijan matlab kuch bhi bakte ho. Veda ek tha, around 6000 saal pehele vedon ko char parts kiya gaya Ved Vyasa ke dwara us samay to Prophet Muhammad nahi the. Haan ye ho sakta hai ki Vedon ka Indra hi Quran ka Prophet Muhammad ho. Narasamsa ka aap jo Sandhi biched kar rahe hai wo elementary Sanskrit grammatical rule ke bahar hai. Sorry bhaijaan Sanskrit is most scientific language in the world aur ye koi bachchon ka khel nahin hain jo aap koi bhi maanle apne man se.
what is this...worshiping different Gods at the same time...do you remember the 10 commandments...so false...
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼!!
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼,
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼)
Assalamu alaikum brother make some video on current condition of India
💕
🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼"
This man in himself is a miracle ma sha Allah. May Allah preserve him
@rajeshj2499huh? Why are u saying this? Have u studied the Hindu Scriptures?
@@Shap0o.PlayZzyes I studied got any problems?
Indeed
@@Shap0o.PlayZz The Sanskrit phrase “महामद इति ख्यात” translates to “known as Mahamad” or “reputed as Mahamad” in English. This phrase is used to indicate that someone is known or reputed by a certain name or title, in this case, Mahamad.
We looove Dr Zakir the hero 🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺
.
..
...
..................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
.....................................................................................
..................................................................
....................................................
.........................................
..............................
.......................
..................
...........
......
....
..
.