I really want to tell you this verse for clarifying my doubts 🙏 arjuna uvācha naṣhṭo mohaḥ smṛitir labdhā tvat-prasādān mayāchyuta sthito ‘smi gata-sandehaḥ kariṣhye vachanaṁ tava Translation:Arjun said: O Infallible One, by Your grace my illusion has been dispelled, and I am situated in knowledge. I am now free from doubts, and I shall act according to Your instructions. Thank you so much for these types of videos on vaishnava and shaiva philosophies. Hare Krishna 🦚❤
Haraye Namaha. We are doing it merely by Bhagavaan's grace, but can never be compared to Him! नाहं कर्ता न कर्ता त्वं कर्ता यस्तु सदा प्रभुः (Mahaabhaarata, Shaanti Parva, Adhyaaya 234, Shloka 84)
Namaskara! I always wanted to find an answer to this question. I have never even heard of such a book "shaiva sarvaswa khandanam" Thank you soo much Hari sarvottama!! vayu jeevottama!!
Haraye Namaha. It's a section of Shri Vijayeendra Teertharu's work, Nyaayamauktikamaala. We recently translated and published it on elib.bhaktideets.org.
@@bhaktideetsharaye namah!! is this DONGI REFERENCE of smartas authentic? : "o keshava,as i created deluding doctrines like pasupata, you also create deluding doctrine pancharatra" Kurma purana, purva bhaga, adhyaaya 28,shlokas 111-115
Hare Krishna Danwat Pranam 🙇♀️ Prabhuji , many many danwats to you for make such a Useful and great video on these topics. All Hari dwesis will be dead to watch this. Oh Krishna , your pranamas from shastras are outstanding prabhu ji.. Thanks For such a Useful and outstanding priceless explanations and pranamas. Jagat Guru Sripada Madhvacharya ki jaya ❤ Jay Srila prabhupada,, Hare Krishna danwat pranam ।
Haraye Namaha. As said by Shri Vedaanta Deshika, "The disease of rejecting facts has no cure." Most Arya Samajis are fanatics whose claims are baseless and are only due to rejecting almost anything which they do not find acceptable, reducing the Shaastras to mere Veda Samhitas. There is no use in refuting them. This channel's purpose is also mainly to spread bhakti and jnaana, as suggested by the name, so we shall keep such things to a minimum. But if there are any specific topics in demand, we can refute anti-Vaishnavas like these, indirectly.
Haraye Namaha. Arya Samaj did have its contributions, but without any fanaticism? Not really. It's their followers who usually spread incorrect ideas about the Shaastras, such as the Mahaabhaarata having only a few thousand shlokas or the Puraanas being bogus, all of which are disproved by the evidences in the works of ancient bhaashyakaras. It's true that they have done good in encouraging many to learn about and practise Dharma, but they cannot be relied upon more than that.
@@bhaktideets iskon people, who deem everyone other than themselves as rascals deserving of hell have no right to declare anybody else as fanatics. And they did not call all puranas bogus, just the bogus parts of/and bogus puranas. They may have been extreme, but never fanatics. Also they upheld vedic studies such as agnihotra which shows its divine prevalence and immense importance in the ramayana. Iskon would not uphold the vedas, deva puja and pitra puja, because its written to be lesser forms of worship meant for selfish people in the Geeta, according to many translations. But deva puja need to be upheld for prosperity of the common man, and is beneficial for all of mankind, not only for bhaktas of a certain god or followers of a certain sect wanting a certain loka. The Arya samaj embraced all and loved all humans as their own irrespective of their caste, gender, economy or eating habits. May the love of Swami Dayananda Saraswati🙏 shine for all. Jai Shri Ram🙏
Haraye Namaha. Why are you bringing ISKCON here? The question was about Arya Samaj and nor do we care about what ISKCONites think or do. Every sampradaaya will have fanatics, but in the case of Arya Samaj, many criticize other darshanas for no reason, which is the problem. As I said, it has its contributions, but their teachings cannot be relied upon highly. Same is the case with most other recent communities, including ISKCON to some extent.
Haraye Namaha. There are actually numerous of them and every jeeva precisely, is their child, as said in the Vishnu Puraana, by Indra Deva himself. But the greatest ones are the Devatas like Praana Deva, Brahmaa Deva, Kaama Deva, etc.
@@bhaktideets how one can get initiated in madhwa tradition? What are pre-requisite (sadhana/rules) one need to follow before approaching tradition so that they can accept u as disciple ?
Haraye Namaha. You need to have absolute faith in Tattvavaada and follow a Saattvika lifestyle. If you're not a Dvija, you won't be given upadesha of Veda mantras. That's all.
Haraye Namaha. For your information, the entire Sharabha Upanishad is bogus and wasn't even quoted before the 15th century by any noted bhaashyakaras. And for that matter, if such an Upanishad existed, why would there be so many explanations even required on this topic? Literally everyone, regardless of sampradaaya, would have accepted it!
Haraye Namaha. Muktika Upanishad itself is bogus, as we said elsewhere too. Other than Smaartas, literally no other sampradaaya even considers it authentic nor the idea of 108 Upanishads. There were originally 1,100+ Upanishads, our of which barely 40-50 authentic ones are left. And as we said already, if we suppose that the Sharabha Upanishad was an actual Upanishad, then how come not a single bhaashyakara mentioned it in reference to the Narasimha-Sharabha incident!? If the Vedas mentioned it, then ALL would accept the idea of Sharabha subduing Narasimha Deva and not give lengthy refutations of it, in the first place!
@@VedicYaduvanshiMuktika also mentions Kali Santarana upanishad which is doubtful authenticity. The only script from Muktika Upanishad comes from the 17th century, no other copies exist.
Haraye Namaha. Kindly contact any Maadhva Matha near you and they shall guide you on the procedures. There is no qualification as such, but for Upanayana, Veda adhikaara, deeksha into Veda mantras, one must be a Dvija and have the tradition of Upanayana by ancestry. Otherwise, everyone is eligible for Vaishnava deeksha, or Pancha Samskaara.
Haraye Namaha. Nope. Vedas, Pancharaatra texts, Itihaasas, etc., can never be Moha Shaastras, especially since the Vedas are the root Shaastras of all others and are very authoritative. The Sharabha Upanishad is totally bogus and not even a genuine Upanishad. It is supposedly linked to the Atharvaveda's Pippalaada Shaakha, to which already the Prashna Upanishad is linked! Even if we suppose that this is a case of multiple Upanishads being linked to one Shaakha of the Vedas, this was never even quoted or mentioned by any Aachaaryas. On top of that, if the Shruti were to mention the defeat of Shri Vishnu at the hands of Shri Rudra, then ALL Vaishnavas would have had to accept it and reinterpreted it differently. But on the contrary, Shri Vijayeendra Teertharu and Shri Shreenivaasa Deekshita have written detailed explanations for the defeat of Sharabha by Narasimha! How would that even be possible?
@@bhaktideets Adi shankara quoted sarabh as hariharantam! नमोऽन्तकान्धकरिपवे पुरद्विषे नमोऽस्तु ते छ्विरदवराहभेदिने। विषोल्लसत्फाणिवरबद्धमूर्तये नमः सदा वृषवरवाहनाय ते ॥ ६३ Parpanch Saar Tantra, 27.63
@@bhaktideets It's doesn't mean if your bogus panchratna kicked out of Vedas , then sarabha Upanishads also , it's a part of Atharvaveda! The Śarabhopanishad (along with Dakṣiṇāmūrti Upaniṣad) is also mentioned in the 1st chapter of "Nāradaparivrājaka Upaniṣad" परिव्राट्त्रिशिखी सीताचूडानिर्वाणमण्डलम् दक्षिणा शरभं स्कन्दं महानारायणाद्वयम् ॥ ~ नारदपरिव्राजकोपनिषत् प्रथमोपदेशः ॥१॥
Haraye Namaha. Our "bogus Pancharaatra" is directly mentioned in the Vedas multiple times and is praised ample times in the Mahaabhaarata and Puraanas. Your Sharabha Upanishad was not even mentioned once by any bhaashyakara who spoke about the Narasimha-Sharabha incident, neither Vaishnava nor Shaiva! The "quotation" you provided is not even found in the Sharabha Upanishad, LOL. And the Naarada Paricraajaka Upanishad isn't authentic either. Shaivas themselves don't consider the Skanda Upanishad authentic, which is mentioned there, LOL. Cope harder.
@@Supreme_of_God_SADASHIVit's obvious you have no clue what you're talking about. "Prapanchasara" doesn't mention Hariharantam, and Parivrajaka says nothing about the Sharabha Upanishad. You people are so ignorant, you can't grasp even the simplest concepts. It seems like all you do is mindlessly copy-paste nonsense from Telegram channels without any real study or understanding of your ownm.
Haraye Namaha. There's nothing to do regarding that. Shiva Geeta appears totally inauthentic, as it contradicts the Shaastras at many levels, is not found in most recensions of the Padma Puraana and wasn't even quoted or commented upon, by any scholars prior to the 15th century.
Can you please tell us, the universe chart( like a person A expands to three forms and then these form expand themselves further to create universe) in a vaisanv view.
Haraye namah! Is Hare Krishna mahamantra powerful than gayatri mantra? Can we replace it with gayatri mantra in sandhyavandane , agnikarya, brahmayajna ?
Haraye Namaha. All Veda mantras or Hari-naama mantras are equally powerful, but they have to be used for their specific purposes only. The Shodashaakshari mantra (Hare Raama Hare Raama Raama....) is Hari-naama and not even the chief Hari-naama japa mantra used by Vaishnavas, especially Maadhva and Shri Vaishnavas, as it is either the Ashtaakshari mantra or a modified form of it, given to advijas. With that said, for sandhyaavandana only the Gaayatri mantra should be used, and for Hari-naama, the ones one received through upadesha from one's Guru should be used. That is the simple answer.
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !! !! VAYU JEEVOTTAMA !! Can you make a video on debate between akshobhya theertha and vidyaranya swami?G R patil(smartha) says that this debate holds no level at all,its a made up story by madhwas to claim their tattvavada as victory for everything. Even madhwas are confused to reply due to lack of historical proofs If you have an idea of it can you make a video on that topic???
Haraye Namaha. Sure. We shall make a video on it in a couple of months probably. G. R. Patil's book is flawed as it revolves around the uncertainty of the dating of Shripaada Madhvacharya, trying to prove that Akshobhya Teertha and Vidyaranya having a debate would be illogical and both lived in different centuries. But Madhvacharya himself has written the date in his own work, Tithinirnaya, which is approximately 14 April 1309 and Akshobhya Teertharu was fourth from him. So, it's obvious that there's no issue in both having a debate. Also, neutral sources like Shri Vaishnavas themselves have mentioned the debate. It is no surprise that those Mayavadis who reject even the visible universe itself would obviously reject all these direct evidences.
@@bhaktideets !! HARI SARVOTTAMA !! !! VAYU JEEVOTTAMA !! POV. when you release that video Madhvas be like " Innondu sali vishwam mithya antha helidre BETHA THANDU ERADU BARISBEKU" ~~~Dialogue was by shri bannanje govindacharya😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !! !! VAYU JIVOTTAMA !! Is there any scriptural reference for hanuman being incarnation of lord vayu other than brahma kanda of garuda purana or can you prove that bramha kanda is manuscriptural and not sectarian interpolation by madhvas? Because many people say that it is clear sectarian interpolation as it contains "sudurlabho madhva shastre cha shaktihi ".......
Haraye Namaha. Yes, the Vaalmiki Raamaayana repeatedly hints that Shri Hanumaan is an avataara of Praana Deva. Moreover, it is said that he shall become Brahmaa, which implies that he is an avataara of Mukhya Praana. Regarding the Branma Khanda of the Garuda Puraana, there is no basis to call the entire Khanda interpolated. Only some parts of it could be, but whole Khandas cannot be.
@@bhaktideets !! HARI SARVOTTAMA !! !! VAYU JIVOTTAMA !! I have a photo in my house that depicts the conversation between lord rama and sage agastya predicting the avatara of madhvacharya who interprets correctly brahma sutras and vyaakaranas....Which part of valmiki ramayana is that shloka
Haraye Namaha. Unfortunately, no idea. A few of us are not well versed in the Raamaayana, so we cannot track down such references. We would suggest asking someone else.
What's your opinion on mayawad philosophy of premanand ji of radhavallabh sampradaya? He stated in his video that we are living in a maya or dream and our purpose is to wake up submerged and became one with that one prambhram. Prambhram is any one yo believe in like RAM KRISHNA SHIVA DURGA NARAYAN etc. IT HAS CONFUSED ME,HOW CAN A VAISNAV BELIEVE IN MAYAWAD PHILOSOPHY?PLZ HELP ME🙏🙏
Haraye Namaha. He could've been influenced by Mayavada. We do not know much about him. As far as our darshana is concerned, these are outright incorrect and the Vaishnava Aagamas and Puraanas very much differ on this.
Haraye Namaha. That would contradict the Vedas, Aagamas, Mahaabhaarata and other Shaastras, so we needn't take it too seriously. But anyway, it is still acceptable and can be interpreted as referring to Shri Shiva's Antaryaami, Shri Narasimha Deva, Sankarshana, when Shri Rudra says, 'Aham' (I), on the basis of 'Aham Brahmaasmi' and 'Tat tvam asi'. The Naaraayana Upanishad itself says that Shiva is a vibhuti of Naaraayana.
Haraye Namaha. Not good. We do respect some genuine bhaktas like Shrimaan Sanjeev Newar, who sincerely work for Dharma. But otherwise, their interpretations of the Shaastras and their fanaticism is pathetic.
@@bhaktideets harihi om! 1)Is there any puranic reference for predictions for madhvacharya being a vayu avatar (mentioning a clue "sanyasi or bramhin")??. 2)Can you show me the authenticity of brahma (moksha)kanda of garuda purana which is allegated to be interpolated by madhvas from fanatic smartas due to the mention "!! sudurlabho madhvashastre cha shaktihi !!" ???????? 3)Same thing for padma purana uttara kanda as it was came from bengal edition so they are targeting it to be from gaudiya sampradaya which is dvaita followers???
Please answer me Prabhu ji 🙏 clear my doubts, with scriptual evidences. Prabhu ji it is written in todal tantra chapter 10 that all the avatar of lord vishnu manifest from 10 fingure of supreme goddess and it is also believed that 10 avatar of lord vishnu manifestation of 10 mahavidya (avatar) of goddess. It tell that: 1.From Dhumavati, Lord Matsya was incarnated 2.From Bagalamukhi, Lord Kurma was incarnated 3.From Bhairavi, Lord Varaha was incarnated 4.From Chinnamasta, Lord Narasimha was incarnated 5.From Tripurasundari, Lord Vaamana was incarnated 6.From Matangi, Lord Parashurama was incarnated 7.From Tara, Lord Rama was incarnated 8.From Kali, Lord Krishna was incarnated 9.From Kamala, Lord Buddha was incarnated 10.From Bhuvaneshvari, Lord Kalki will be incarnated In devi Bhagwatam canto nine it is also written that lalita Tripurasundari become 2 as radha amd krishna in vaikuntha. The seed (beej) mantra of goddess kali and Krishna is same (kleem) Krishna bodily features and postures are also like female. He also have no beard and moustache. He always like to do makeup like girls. There are many symptoms which ahow krishna manifest from goddess. Kindly clear my confusions. Do you believe in manidweep dhaam of shaktas? Does it really exist? If no then what's the reason according to scriptures and tell me that what happen to that devotee who give there life in achieving manidweep dham?
Haraye Namaha. LOL, the "Muktika canon" itself is bogus and accepted only by neo-Smaartas. No such Upanishads were quoted in the past by any bhaashyakaras.
!! Hari sarvottama!! !! Vayu jeevottama!! !! Shrimad anandatheertha bhagavathpadacharya gurubhyo namah !! I have a small doubt 1)Many fanatic smartas accuse madhvas for quoting brahma kanda of garuda purana for the authenticity of manimanjari but brahma kanda itself is interpolated by madhvas(accusation of smarty pants) I JUST NEED AUTHENTICITY OF BRAHMA KANDA IN VEDAS OR PURANAS TO DEFEND THEM... 2)Many sri vaishnavas(iyengars) claim that madhva haridasa sahithya lineage sri jagannatha dasaru insulted sri ramanujacharya as incarnation of a demon vatapi in his harikathamritha saara, while quoting that madhvacharya had defeated the kubhashyas of duratma gurus on brahmasutras.
Haraye Namaha. Apologies for the late reply. The present day edition of the Garuda Puraana is not very much authentic and no quotations of **any** Aachaarya can be found today. Further, other than Brahma Khanda not being included in some recensions of the Garuda Puraana, there is no other argument to claim that it is inauthentic. Likewise, even the initial Khanda of the Garuda Puraana has been alleged to be interpolated by Smaartas. Moreover, the contents of the Brahma Khanda of the Garuda Puraana are well supported by and accord with other Shaastras, so that allegation holds no water. There have been cordial relations between Shr Vaishnavas and Maadhvas since centuries. Vedaanta Deshika himself has appreciated Madhvacharya and considered Tattvavaada as a valid darshana, in his granthas. So, the allegations of Maadhvas considering Ramanujacharya a demon is totally baseless. Harikathaamrta Saara collectively criticizes all 21 pre-Maadhva Vedaantins as authors of kubhaashyas, based on Nahi Ninda Nyaaya, not criticizing any philosopher specifically. His intention was just to praise Madhvacharya as greater than all other Vedaantins. Likewise, Shri Vaishnavas themselves believe that all darshanas other than their own, are kudharmas. It is uncanny for a Shri Vaishnava to criticize Maadhvas over such allegations, which are actually fabricated by Smaarta fantics.
Hare Krsna Prabhu🙏 Prabhu aren't we using Ardha Kukkuti Nyaya by rejecting the Shaiva stance and pramanas from Shaastras on Narsimha Sharabha incidence and only accepting our Vaisnava Stance and Pramana from Shaastras?
Haraye Namaha. Not at all. The Shaastras themselves are clear that certain Shaastras, especially the ones going against Vishnu Paratva, were composed for deluding non-devotees and taking people away from Shri Vishnu. (Janaardana said): “Now I shall create such things as would soon engender doubt and misconception among men. Mighty-armed Rudra, you too better have Moha-Shaastras (misleading works) produced. Let the people be made to see what is true and what is against truth. Make yourself well-known to the world and spread darkness with regard to me.” -Varaaha Puraana, Adhyaaya 70, Shlokas 35-36 (quoted by Shri Yamunacharya, in Aagama Pramaanya; by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in his Brahma Sutra bhaashya, Adhyaaya 1, Paada 1, Sutra 1) Even the Padma Puraana repeats the same thing: (Shri Shiva recalled Shri Vishnu’s words): “O Sambhu, I shall aIso propitiate you and will always receive a boon from you. Being born in the ages like the Dvaapara Yuga and among men in Kali Yuga, make people averse to Me, with the Shaastras prepared by you. So also censure me so that the world become better and better. I shall produce this delusion which will delude people. You too, O mighty-armed Rudra, produce sacred texts that would delude people. O you of great arms, produce (the texts) that are false and spurious. Manifest yourself and keep Me hidden.” -Padma Puraana 6, Adhyaaya 71, Shlokas 106-107 (quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in the Mahaabhaarata Taatparya Nirnaya, Adhyaaya 1, Shlokas 53-58) So, when the Shaiva stance on this directly goes against the injunctions of the Vedas, Aagamas and other higher Shaastras, which themselves directly mention Shri Vishnu's Supremacy, there is no point in accepting them. So, the Skanda Puraana says: शास्त्रं च वेदाः स्मृतयः पुराणं वै तदात्मकम् । इतिहासः पंचरात्रं भारतं च महामते ॥ १२ ॥ “O highly intelligent one, the Vedas, Smrtis, Puraanas which have the Vedas and Smrtis for their soul, Itihaasas, Pancharaatra Aagamas and the Mahaabharata are the texts which are to be considered ‘Shaastra’.” -Skanda Puraana, Vaishnava Khanda, Vaishaakhamaasa-Maahatmya, Adhyaaya 19, Shloka 12 (Quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in his Brahma Sutra bhaashya, Adhyaaya 1, Paada 1, Sutra 3)
Hare Krishna prabhuji, Maharaj Ji already gave mind-blowing Explanation that is Outstanding ,many many danwats to him . And you see,also Vaisnavottam Lord Shiva himself what Says, व्यामोहाय चराचरस्य जगतस्ते ते पुराणागमास् तां तामेव हि देवतां परमिकां जल्पन्तु कल्पावधि सिद्धान्ते पुनरेक एव भगवान् विष्णुः समस्तागम व्यापारेषु विवेचन व्यतिकरं नीतेषु निश्चीयते ॥ - For bewildering the living entities of the universe, let the different Puranas and other scriptures speak, until the end of the kalpa, about their various "supreme devatas. However, in conclusion, Lord Hari alone is discerned in all the scriptures and in all conduct through harmonizing all statements with intelligence. Lord HARI alone is Supreme person Param Purusottam. The Suprem Lord . - वैदिक शास्त्र तथा पुराण अनेक प्रकार के हैं। उनमें से प्रत्येक में विशेष देवताओं का वर्णन प्रमुख देवताओं के रूप में पाया जाता है। यह समस्त चर तथा अचर प्राणियों में मोह उत्पन्न करने के लिए है। उन्हें निरन्तर ऐसी ही कल्पनाओं में लगे रहने दो। किन्तु जब इन सारे वैदिक शास्त्रों का सामूहिक विश्लेषण किया जाता है, तब निष्कर्ष यही निकलता है कि भगवान् विष्णु ही एकमात्र पूर्ण पुरुषोत्तम भगवान् हैं।" (Lord Shiva instructs Parvati- Padma Purana. 4.99.26) , So prabhu ji, Lord Shiva himself says, only " Hari Sarvottam ". All glories to Jagat guru Sripada Madhvacharya ki jaya ❤ Jay Srila Prabhupada. Hare Krishna danwat pranam .
CAN YOU PLEASE TELL THAT WHY SRI VISHNU GOT HIS SUDHARSHNA FROM SRI SHIVA ? ALSO IN THE SHIVA PURAN IT IS STATED THAT SRI VISHNU WORSHIPPED SHIVA AND THEN SRI SHIVA OFFERED THE SUDHARSHANA TO SRI VISNU ? WHY DID SRI VISHNU DID THIS ? Also why Sri Vishnu and Sri Bramha fought for Who is Supreme? Please clear my Confusions 🙏
Haraye Namaha. These are Shaiva arguments, which have been debunked by Svaami Vijayeendra Teertha Shripaadagalu, in Shaiva Sarvasva Khandanam, Nyaayamauktikamaala. You can find it on our E-Library: elib.bhaktideets.org/
@@bhaktideets Thanks for your support. Wish you may you success in preaching the message of Sri Madhva ❤️ Is this partial work of the Nyaayamauktiamaala of Sri Vijayendra Teertharu ? Is the complete work available in English?
Haraye Namaha. It was Indra who did so, overpowered by his Antaryaami, ie. Shri Vishnu. It's a different incident. And Shiva was temporarily overcome by tamas, as in the case of asura aavesha sometimes among Devatas. This is mentioned in the Chhaandogya Upanishad, Khanda 1, Prapaathaka 2.
Maharaj please i beg for forgiveness from the bottom of my heart at your divine Lotus feet i insulted you i deeply regret it i beg for forgiveness i desparately beg online because i could not physically fall at your Lotus feet. Forgive me
Haraye Namaha. Simply because of either: (1) Kalpa or Manvantara bheda (2) Those sections of the Puraanas are intentionally misleading, to delude Taamasikas and Raajasikas. This is stated in the Varaaha and Padma Puraanas. एषं सृजाम्याशु योजनान् मोहयिष्यति । त्वं च रुद्र महाबाहो मोहशास्त्राणि कारय ॥ अतथ्यानि वितथ्यानि दर्शयस्व महाभुज । प्रकाशं कुरु चात्मानामप्रकाशं च मां कुरु ॥ (Janaardana said): “Now I shall create such things as would soon engender doubt and misconception among men. Mighty-armed Rudra, you too better have Moha Shaastras produced (by Dadichi, etc.). Let the people be made to see what is not true and what is against truth. Make yourself well-known to the world and spread darkness with regard to Me,” thus is known from this declaration of the Varaaha Puraana. -Varaaha Puraana, Adhyaaya 70, Shlokas 35-36 (Quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in his Brahma Sutra Bhaashya, Adhyaaya 1, Paada 1, Sutra 1; Shri Yamunacharya, in Aagama Pramaanya) परमो विष्णुरेवैकस्तज्ज्ञानं मोक्षसाधनम् । शास्त्राणां निर्णयस्त्वेष तदन्यन्मोहनाय हि ॥ ज्ञानं विना तु या मुक्तिः साम्यं च मम विष्णुना । तीर्थाऽदिमात्रतो ज्ञानं ममाऽधिक्यं च विष्णुतः ॥ अभेदश्चास्मदादीनां मुक्तानां हरिणा तथा । इत्यादि सर्वं मोहाय कथ्यते पुत्र नान्यथा ॥ (Shri Shiva said to Skanda): “Vishnu alone is the Highest. Knowledge about Him is the means of moksha. This is the purport of the Shaastras. Anything other than that causes delusion. The ideas stating that moksha is attainable without jnaana, my equivalence with Vishnu, jnaana being obtained by visiting holy places, my superiority over Vishnu or non-difference between devotees like me or mukta jeevas with Vishnu these lead to delusion and to nothing else, O putra.” -Padma Puraana, Uttara Khanda, Adhyaay 71, Shlokas 114-116 (Quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in the Mahaabhaarata Taatparyya Nirnnaya, Adhyaaya 1, Shlokas 53-55)
Narasimha's "fightng back" is all Madhwist and Iyengarist fiction. In the Sanskrit scriptures composed in Aryaavarta Sharabha killed Narasimha- end of story (in the skanda purana version, they both die).
Haraye Namaha. 😂🤣 Nice to see you coping here, Mr. Deepthinker/SK/Swaminath Kumar. But no matter what you say, the Shaastras and granthas of bhaashyakaras are clear on that.
Haraye Namaha. Where did I delete your comments other than your mere hate comments LOL? And yes, I'm happy with our Aachaaryas' "lies," because they're still proveable by the Shaastras and have been shown to be, by ample scholars both from the past and current times. 😂
The Shiva Purana mentions Sharabha attacking Narasimha and immobilizing him. He thus quelled Narasimha's terrifying rage. It is also said that Sharabha then decapitated and de-skinned Narasimha so Shiva could wear the hide and lion-head as a garment. The Linga Purana and the Sharabha Upanishad also mention the mutilation and murder of Narasimha. After the mutilation, Vishnu assumed his normal form and retired to his abode, after duly praising Shiva. It was from here on that Shiva came to be known as "Sharabeshamurti" or "Simhagnamurti".
The Padma puran, narada Pañcarātra and mantra Mahrnava tantra, mentions Narasimha as the conqueror of Vīrabhadra (Śarabha), while as per Satvata tantra and Vāsudeva Sahasranāma of Padma puran/Maharnava Tantra, Narasimha wears the head of Rudra. LakshminarayanaSamhita mentions How Śarabha rupa is a grace of Viṣṇu alone, while Sesa Samhitā talks of iconography of Narasimha, as Tearing apart both Śarabha and Hiranyakashipu, hence being called "Śarabha samhara moorthy".
Haraye Namaha. That's exactly why we disagree with the Shaiva Puraanas, since they are Shaiva Shaastras. Also, the Sharabha Upanishad is a bogus Upanishad which hasn't been quoted or mentioned by ANY Vidvaans in relation to the Narasimha-Sharabha incident. On the contrary, they've literally mentioned that the idea of Sharabha subduing Narasimha is avaidika and contradicts the Vedas.
Actually in Shaiva puranas Veera Bhadra was defeated by Narsimha and Shiva had to come as Sharaba and then in ganesh puran then a very intense fight happened between them and maa durga Poured a nectar which calmed Narsimha and then he was defeated
All my glories to purn purshottam shree krishn Chandr ❤
@@keshavkumarjha5763 hi
I really want to tell you this verse for clarifying my doubts 🙏
arjuna uvācha
naṣhṭo mohaḥ smṛitir labdhā tvat-prasādān mayāchyuta
sthito ‘smi gata-sandehaḥ kariṣhye vachanaṁ tava
Translation:Arjun said: O Infallible One, by Your grace my illusion has been dispelled, and I am situated in knowledge. I am now free from doubts, and I shall act according to Your instructions.
Thank you so much for these types of videos on vaishnava and shaiva philosophies. Hare Krishna 🦚❤
Haraye Namaha.
We are doing it merely by Bhagavaan's grace, but can never be compared to Him!
नाहं कर्ता न कर्ता त्वं कर्ता यस्तु सदा प्रभुः (Mahaabhaarata, Shaanti Parva, Adhyaaya 234, Shloka 84)
Namaskara! I always wanted to find an answer to this question. I have never even heard of such a book "shaiva sarvaswa khandanam"
Thank you soo much
Hari sarvottama!! vayu jeevottama!!
Haraye Namaha.
It's a section of Shri Vijayeendra Teertharu's work, Nyaayamauktikamaala. We recently translated and published it on elib.bhaktideets.org.
@@bhaktideetsharaye namah!!
is this DONGI REFERENCE of smartas authentic? :
"o keshava,as i created deluding doctrines like pasupata, you also create deluding doctrine pancharatra"
Kurma purana, purva bhaga, adhyaaya 28,shlokas 111-115
That is from a tamasa purana hence not authentic@@thelegendshrirambg3157
Narayana Narayana 🙏🏼🙏🏼
Hare Krishna🙏
Nicely presented.
Thank you for doing away with the background beats. Distracting they were😅
🙏
Very well presented!
Thanks for making a video on this much-awaited topic.
Hare Krishna Danwat Pranam 🙇♀️ Prabhuji , many many danwats to you for make such a Useful and great video on these topics. All Hari dwesis will be dead to watch this. Oh Krishna , your pranamas from shastras are outstanding prabhu ji.. Thanks For such a Useful and outstanding priceless explanations and pranamas.
Jagat Guru Sripada Madhvacharya ki jaya ❤
Jay Srila prabhupada,, Hare Krishna danwat pranam ।
Hare Krishna prabhuji please defeat the araya samaj they are constantly spewing venom against all vaishnavs
Haraye Namaha.
As said by Shri Vedaanta Deshika, "The disease of rejecting facts has no cure." Most Arya Samajis are fanatics whose claims are baseless and are only due to rejecting almost anything which they do not find acceptable, reducing the Shaastras to mere Veda Samhitas. There is no use in refuting them. This channel's purpose is also mainly to spread bhakti and jnaana, as suggested by the name, so we shall keep such things to a minimum. But if there are any specific topics in demand, we can refute anti-Vaishnavas like these, indirectly.
@@bhaktideets Arya samaj is the reason that some form of veda based education is still imparted without any fanaticism in this country.
Haraye Namaha.
Arya Samaj did have its contributions, but without any fanaticism? Not really. It's their followers who usually spread incorrect ideas about the Shaastras, such as the Mahaabhaarata having only a few thousand shlokas or the Puraanas being bogus, all of which are disproved by the evidences in the works of ancient bhaashyakaras. It's true that they have done good in encouraging many to learn about and practise Dharma, but they cannot be relied upon more than that.
@@bhaktideets iskon people, who deem everyone other than themselves as rascals deserving of hell have no right to declare anybody else as fanatics. And they did not call all puranas bogus, just the bogus parts of/and bogus puranas. They may have been extreme, but never fanatics. Also they upheld vedic studies such as agnihotra which shows its divine prevalence and immense importance in the ramayana. Iskon would not uphold the vedas, deva puja and pitra puja, because its written to be lesser forms of worship meant for selfish people in the Geeta, according to many translations. But deva puja need to be upheld for prosperity of the common man, and is beneficial for all of mankind, not only for bhaktas of a certain god or followers of a certain sect wanting a certain loka. The Arya samaj embraced all and loved all humans as their own irrespective of their caste, gender, economy or eating habits. May the love of Swami Dayananda Saraswati🙏 shine for all.
Jai Shri Ram🙏
Haraye Namaha.
Why are you bringing ISKCON here? The question was about Arya Samaj and nor do we care about what ISKCONites think or do. Every sampradaaya will have fanatics, but in the case of Arya Samaj, many criticize other darshanas for no reason, which is the problem. As I said, it has its contributions, but their teachings cannot be relied upon highly. Same is the case with most other recent communities, including ISKCON to some extent.
Please make a video on all tantra of different sects. Which tantra we should follow and which we should reject. Please make a video on it prabhuji
Thank you 🙏
For giving us knowledge of shastras .
Please also give us information about 18 children of Devi Lakshmi and Shri Hari.
@bhaktideets
Haraye Namaha.
There are actually numerous of them and every jeeva precisely, is their child, as said in the Vishnu Puraana, by Indra Deva himself. But the greatest ones are the Devatas like Praana Deva, Brahmaa Deva, Kaama Deva, etc.
@@bhaktideets how one can get initiated in madhwa tradition? What are pre-requisite (sadhana/rules) one need to follow before approaching tradition so that they can accept u as disciple ?
Haraye Namaha.
You need to have absolute faith in Tattvavaada and follow a Saattvika lifestyle. If you're not a Dvija, you won't be given upadesha of Veda mantras. That's all.
😂😂😂Sharab Upanishad mentions , Sharab was an incarnation of Shiv and killed Narsimha
Haraye Namaha.
For your information, the entire Sharabha Upanishad is bogus and wasn't even quoted before the 15th century by any noted bhaashyakaras. And for that matter, if such an Upanishad existed, why would there be so many explanations even required on this topic? Literally everyone, regardless of sampradaaya, would have accepted it!
@bhaktideets Sharab Upanishad is mentioned in Muktika Upanishad, that was written in 15 th century ..
Haraye Namaha.
Muktika Upanishad itself is bogus, as we said elsewhere too. Other than Smaartas, literally no other sampradaaya even considers it authentic nor the idea of 108 Upanishads. There were originally 1,100+ Upanishads, our of which barely 40-50 authentic ones are left.
And as we said already, if we suppose that the Sharabha Upanishad was an actual Upanishad, then how come not a single bhaashyakara mentioned it in reference to the Narasimha-Sharabha incident!? If the Vedas mentioned it, then ALL would accept the idea of Sharabha subduing Narasimha Deva and not give lengthy refutations of it, in the first place!
Correct 👍@@bhaktideets
@@VedicYaduvanshiMuktika also mentions Kali Santarana upanishad which is doubtful authenticity. The only script from Muktika Upanishad comes from the 17th century, no other copies exist.
how and where can we get initiated in madhva sampradaya, and qualifications required to get initiated?❤
Haraye Namaha.
Kindly contact any Maadhva Matha near you and they shall guide you on the procedures. There is no qualification as such, but for Upanayana, Veda adhikaara, deeksha into Veda mantras, one must be a Dvija and have the tradition of Upanayana by ancestry. Otherwise, everyone is eligible for Vaishnava deeksha, or Pancha Samskaara.
@@bhaktideets thank you for your response ❤️
Can you please reflute this channel name (Sanatan Dharma Decoded)
Hare Krishna,
Can we consider Sharabha Upanishad as a moha shastra although it is a part of Atharva veda?
Haraye Namaha.
Nope. Vedas, Pancharaatra texts, Itihaasas, etc., can never be Moha Shaastras, especially since the Vedas are the root Shaastras of all others and are very authoritative. The Sharabha Upanishad is totally bogus and not even a genuine Upanishad. It is supposedly linked to the Atharvaveda's Pippalaada Shaakha, to which already the Prashna Upanishad is linked! Even if we suppose that this is a case of multiple Upanishads being linked to one Shaakha of the Vedas, this was never even quoted or mentioned by any Aachaaryas.
On top of that, if the Shruti were to mention the defeat of Shri Vishnu at the hands of Shri Rudra, then ALL Vaishnavas would have had to accept it and reinterpreted it differently. But on the contrary, Shri Vijayeendra Teertharu and Shri Shreenivaasa Deekshita have written detailed explanations for the defeat of Sharabha by Narasimha! How would that even be possible?
@@bhaktideets Adi shankara quoted sarabh as hariharantam!
नमोऽन्तकान्धकरिपवे पुरद्विषे
नमोऽस्तु ते छ्विरदवराहभेदिने।
विषोल्लसत्फाणिवरबद्धमूर्तये
नमः सदा वृषवरवाहनाय ते ॥ ६३
Parpanch Saar Tantra, 27.63
@@bhaktideets It's doesn't mean if your bogus panchratna kicked out of Vedas , then sarabha Upanishads also , it's a part of Atharvaveda!
The Śarabhopanishad (along with Dakṣiṇāmūrti Upaniṣad) is also mentioned in the 1st chapter of "Nāradaparivrājaka Upaniṣad"
परिव्राट्त्रिशिखी सीताचूडानिर्वाणमण्डलम्
दक्षिणा शरभं स्कन्दं महानारायणाद्वयम् ॥
~ नारदपरिव्राजकोपनिषत् प्रथमोपदेशः ॥१॥
Haraye Namaha.
Our "bogus Pancharaatra" is directly mentioned in the Vedas multiple times and is praised ample times in the Mahaabhaarata and Puraanas. Your Sharabha Upanishad was not even mentioned once by any bhaashyakara who spoke about the Narasimha-Sharabha incident, neither Vaishnava nor Shaiva! The "quotation" you provided is not even found in the Sharabha Upanishad, LOL. And the Naarada Paricraajaka Upanishad isn't authentic either. Shaivas themselves don't consider the Skanda Upanishad authentic, which is mentioned there, LOL. Cope harder.
@@Supreme_of_God_SADASHIVit's obvious you have no clue what you're talking about. "Prapanchasara" doesn't mention Hariharantam, and Parivrajaka says nothing about the Sharabha Upanishad. You people are so ignorant, you can't grasp even the simplest concepts. It seems like all you do is mindlessly copy-paste nonsense from Telegram channels without any real study or understanding of your ownm.
Plz reflection shiv gita and shiv gita related all shaiva's claimed🙏
Haraye Namaha.
There's nothing to do regarding that. Shiva Geeta appears totally inauthentic, as it contradicts the Shaastras at many levels, is not found in most recensions of the Padma Puraana and wasn't even quoted or commented upon, by any scholars prior to the 15th century.
Can you please tell us, the universe chart( like a person A expands to three forms and then these form expand themselves further to create universe) in a vaisanv view.
Haraye namah!
Is Hare Krishna mahamantra powerful than gayatri mantra?
Can we replace it with gayatri mantra in sandhyavandane , agnikarya, brahmayajna ?
Haraye Namaha.
All Veda mantras or Hari-naama mantras are equally powerful, but they have to be used for their specific purposes only. The Shodashaakshari mantra (Hare Raama Hare Raama Raama....) is Hari-naama and not even the chief Hari-naama japa mantra used by Vaishnavas, especially Maadhva and Shri Vaishnavas, as it is either the Ashtaakshari mantra or a modified form of it, given to advijas.
With that said, for sandhyaavandana only the Gaayatri mantra should be used, and for Hari-naama, the ones one received through upadesha from one's Guru should be used. That is the simple answer.
who is the pram Brahma - mahavishnu or Narayan residing in vaikuntha??
Harihi om!!
Both are same
Haraye Namaha.
Both are the same Person.
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !!
!! VAYU JEEVOTTAMA !!
Can you make a video on debate between akshobhya theertha and vidyaranya swami?G R patil(smartha) says that this debate holds no level at all,its a made up story by madhwas to claim their tattvavada as victory for everything.
Even madhwas are confused to reply due to lack of historical proofs
If you have an idea of it can you make a video on that topic???
Haraye Namaha.
Sure. We shall make a video on it in a couple of months probably. G. R. Patil's book is flawed as it revolves around the uncertainty of the dating of Shripaada Madhvacharya, trying to prove that Akshobhya Teertha and Vidyaranya having a debate would be illogical and both lived in different centuries.
But Madhvacharya himself has written the date in his own work, Tithinirnaya, which is approximately 14 April 1309 and Akshobhya Teertharu was fourth from him. So, it's obvious that there's no issue in both having a debate. Also, neutral sources like Shri Vaishnavas themselves have mentioned the debate. It is no surprise that those Mayavadis who reject even the visible universe itself would obviously reject all these direct evidences.
@@bhaktideets
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !!
!! VAYU JEEVOTTAMA !!
POV. when you release that video
Madhvas be like
" Innondu sali vishwam mithya antha helidre BETHA THANDU ERADU BARISBEKU"
~~~Dialogue was by shri bannanje govindacharya😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !!
!! VAYU JIVOTTAMA !!
Is there any scriptural reference for hanuman being incarnation of lord vayu other than brahma kanda of garuda purana or can you prove that bramha kanda is manuscriptural and not sectarian interpolation by madhvas? Because many people say that it is clear sectarian interpolation as it contains
"sudurlabho madhva shastre cha shaktihi ".......
Haraye Namaha.
Yes, the Vaalmiki Raamaayana repeatedly hints that Shri Hanumaan is an avataara of Praana Deva. Moreover, it is said that he shall become Brahmaa, which implies that he is an avataara of Mukhya Praana.
Regarding the Branma Khanda of the Garuda Puraana, there is no basis to call the entire Khanda interpolated. Only some parts of it could be, but whole Khandas cannot be.
@@bhaktideets
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !!
!! VAYU JIVOTTAMA !!
I have a photo in my house that depicts the conversation between lord rama and sage agastya predicting the avatara of madhvacharya who interprets correctly brahma sutras and vyaakaranas....Which part of valmiki ramayana is that shloka
@@bhaktideets
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !!
!! VAYU JIVOTTAMA !!
Above shloka for reference :
!! Sasutravratyarthapadam mahartham sasangraham saadhyati vykapindraha.!!
!! soyam navavyaakaranaarthvetta brahma bhavishyatyapi te prasadaat !!
Haraye Namaha.
Unfortunately, no idea. A few of us are not well versed in the Raamaayana, so we cannot track down such references. We would suggest asking someone else.
What's your opinion on mayawad philosophy of premanand ji of radhavallabh sampradaya? He stated in his video that we are living in a maya or dream and our purpose is to wake up submerged and became one with that one prambhram. Prambhram is any one yo believe in like RAM KRISHNA SHIVA DURGA NARAYAN etc.
IT HAS CONFUSED ME,HOW CAN A VAISNAV BELIEVE IN MAYAWAD PHILOSOPHY?PLZ HELP ME🙏🙏
Haraye Namaha.
He could've been influenced by Mayavada. We do not know much about him. As far as our darshana is concerned, these are outright incorrect and the Vaishnava Aagamas and Puraanas very much differ on this.
premanand ji is not a real Vaishnava, he is Mayavadi. Vallabha sampradaya does nos agree to his interpretations
Some people say that iswar gita tells us that shiva is prambhram and cause of all causes. What is your opinion on it.
Haraye Namaha.
That would contradict the Vedas, Aagamas, Mahaabhaarata and other Shaastras, so we needn't take it too seriously. But anyway, it is still acceptable and can be interpreted as referring to Shri Shiva's Antaryaami, Shri Narasimha Deva, Sankarshana, when Shri Rudra says, 'Aham' (I), on the basis of 'Aham Brahmaasmi' and 'Tat tvam asi'. The Naaraayana Upanishad itself says that Shiva is a vibhuti of Naaraayana.
@@bhaktideets hare krishna,
What's your views on Arya samaj
@@Utkarsh.233harihi om!
Its a bigotry and full misrepresentation ofvedas and distortion of puranas....
Haraye Namaha.
Not good. We do respect some genuine bhaktas like Shrimaan Sanjeev Newar, who sincerely work for Dharma. But otherwise, their interpretations of the Shaastras and their fanaticism is pathetic.
@@bhaktideets harihi om!
1)Is there any puranic reference for predictions for madhvacharya being a vayu avatar (mentioning a clue "sanyasi or bramhin")??.
2)Can you show me the authenticity of brahma (moksha)kanda of garuda purana which is allegated to be interpolated by madhvas from fanatic smartas due to the mention "!! sudurlabho madhvashastre cha shaktihi !!"
????????
3)Same thing for padma purana uttara kanda as it was came from bengal edition so they are targeting it to be from gaudiya sampradaya which is dvaita followers???
Please answer me Prabhu ji 🙏 clear my doubts, with scriptual evidences.
Prabhu ji it is written in todal tantra chapter 10 that all the avatar of lord vishnu manifest from 10 fingure of supreme goddess and it is also believed that 10 avatar of lord vishnu manifestation of 10 mahavidya (avatar) of goddess. It tell that:
1.From Dhumavati, Lord Matsya was incarnated
2.From Bagalamukhi, Lord Kurma was incarnated
3.From Bhairavi, Lord Varaha was incarnated
4.From Chinnamasta, Lord Narasimha was incarnated
5.From Tripurasundari, Lord Vaamana was incarnated
6.From Matangi, Lord Parashurama was incarnated
7.From Tara, Lord Rama was incarnated
8.From Kali, Lord Krishna was incarnated
9.From Kamala, Lord Buddha was incarnated
10.From Bhuvaneshvari, Lord Kalki will be incarnated
In devi Bhagwatam canto nine it is also written that lalita Tripurasundari become 2 as radha amd krishna in vaikuntha.
The seed (beej) mantra of goddess kali and Krishna is same (kleem)
Krishna bodily features and postures are also like female. He also have no beard and moustache. He always like to do makeup like girls.
There are many symptoms which ahow krishna manifest from goddess.
Kindly clear my confusions.
Do you believe in manidweep dhaam of shaktas? Does it really exist? If no then what's the reason according to scriptures and tell me that what happen to that devotee who give there life in achieving manidweep dham?
What is Sharabha Upanishad of Atharva Veda ?
Haraye Namaha.
It's a bogus Upanishad.
@@bhaktideetswhat bogus ?
Sharab Upanishad is a part of 108 Upanishad of Muktika canon
Haraye Namaha.
LOL, the "Muktika canon" itself is bogus and accepted only by neo-Smaartas. No such Upanishads were quoted in the past by any bhaashyakaras.
!! Hari sarvottama!!
!! Vayu jeevottama!!
!! Shrimad anandatheertha bhagavathpadacharya gurubhyo namah !!
I have a small doubt
1)Many fanatic smartas accuse madhvas for quoting brahma kanda of garuda purana for the authenticity of manimanjari but brahma kanda itself is interpolated by madhvas(accusation of smarty pants)
I JUST NEED AUTHENTICITY OF BRAHMA KANDA IN VEDAS OR PURANAS TO DEFEND THEM...
2)Many sri vaishnavas(iyengars)
claim that madhva haridasa sahithya lineage sri jagannatha dasaru insulted sri ramanujacharya as incarnation of a demon vatapi in his harikathamritha saara, while quoting that madhvacharya had defeated the kubhashyas of duratma gurus on brahmasutras.
Haraye Namaha.
Apologies for the late reply. The present day edition of the Garuda Puraana is not very much authentic and no quotations of **any** Aachaarya can be found today. Further, other than Brahma Khanda not being included in some recensions of the Garuda Puraana, there is no other argument to claim that it is inauthentic. Likewise, even the initial Khanda of the Garuda Puraana has been alleged to be interpolated by Smaartas. Moreover, the contents of the Brahma Khanda of the Garuda Puraana are well supported by and accord with other Shaastras, so that allegation holds no water.
There have been cordial relations between Shr Vaishnavas and Maadhvas since centuries. Vedaanta Deshika himself has appreciated Madhvacharya and considered Tattvavaada as a valid darshana, in his granthas. So, the allegations of Maadhvas considering Ramanujacharya a demon is totally baseless.
Harikathaamrta Saara collectively criticizes all 21 pre-Maadhva Vedaantins as authors of kubhaashyas, based on Nahi Ninda Nyaaya, not criticizing any philosopher specifically. His intention was just to praise Madhvacharya as greater than all other Vedaantins. Likewise, Shri Vaishnavas themselves believe that all darshanas other than their own, are kudharmas. It is uncanny for a Shri Vaishnava to criticize Maadhvas over such allegations, which are actually fabricated by Smaarta fantics.
@@SomeshwaranKAre we really sure that those lines were indeed said by Adi Shankara?
Hare Krsna Prabhu🙏
Prabhu aren't we using Ardha Kukkuti Nyaya by rejecting the Shaiva stance and pramanas from Shaastras on Narsimha Sharabha incidence and only accepting our Vaisnava Stance and Pramana from Shaastras?
Haraye Namaha.
Not at all. The Shaastras themselves are clear that certain Shaastras, especially the ones going against Vishnu Paratva, were composed for deluding non-devotees and taking people away from Shri Vishnu.
(Janaardana said): “Now I shall create such things as would soon engender doubt and misconception among men. Mighty-armed Rudra, you too better have Moha-Shaastras (misleading works) produced. Let the people be made to see what is true and what is against truth. Make yourself well-known to the world and spread darkness with regard to me.”
-Varaaha Puraana, Adhyaaya 70, Shlokas 35-36 (quoted by Shri Yamunacharya, in Aagama Pramaanya; by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in his Brahma Sutra bhaashya, Adhyaaya 1, Paada 1, Sutra 1)
Even the Padma Puraana repeats the same thing:
(Shri Shiva recalled Shri Vishnu’s words): “O Sambhu, I shall aIso propitiate you and will always receive a boon from you. Being born in the ages like the Dvaapara Yuga and among men in Kali Yuga, make people averse to Me, with the Shaastras prepared by you. So also censure me so that the world become better and better. I shall produce this delusion which will delude people. You too, O mighty-armed Rudra, produce sacred texts that would delude people. O you of great arms, produce (the texts) that are false and spurious. Manifest yourself and keep Me hidden.”
-Padma Puraana 6, Adhyaaya 71, Shlokas 106-107 (quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in the Mahaabhaarata Taatparya Nirnaya, Adhyaaya 1, Shlokas 53-58)
So, when the Shaiva stance on this directly goes against the injunctions of the Vedas, Aagamas and other higher Shaastras, which themselves directly mention Shri Vishnu's Supremacy, there is no point in accepting them. So, the Skanda Puraana says:
शास्त्रं च वेदाः स्मृतयः पुराणं वै तदात्मकम् । इतिहासः पंचरात्रं भारतं च महामते ॥ १२ ॥
“O highly intelligent one, the Vedas, Smrtis, Puraanas which have the Vedas and Smrtis for their soul, Itihaasas, Pancharaatra Aagamas and the Mahaabharata are the texts which are to be considered ‘Shaastra’.”
-Skanda Puraana, Vaishnava Khanda, Vaishaakhamaasa-Maahatmya, Adhyaaya 19, Shloka 12 (Quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in his Brahma Sutra bhaashya, Adhyaaya 1, Paada 1, Sutra 3)
Hare Krishna prabhuji, Maharaj Ji already gave mind-blowing Explanation that is Outstanding ,many many danwats to him . And you see,also Vaisnavottam Lord Shiva himself what Says, व्यामोहाय चराचरस्य जगतस्ते ते पुराणागमास् तां तामेव हि देवतां परमिकां जल्पन्तु कल्पावधि सिद्धान्ते पुनरेक एव भगवान् विष्णुः समस्तागम व्यापारेषु विवेचन व्यतिकरं नीतेषु निश्चीयते ॥ -
For bewildering the living entities of the universe, let the different Puranas and other scriptures speak, until the end of the kalpa, about their various "supreme devatas. However, in conclusion, Lord Hari alone is discerned in all the scriptures and in all conduct through harmonizing all statements with intelligence. Lord HARI alone is Supreme person Param Purusottam. The Suprem Lord .
- वैदिक शास्त्र तथा पुराण अनेक प्रकार के हैं। उनमें से प्रत्येक में विशेष देवताओं का वर्णन प्रमुख देवताओं के रूप में पाया जाता है। यह समस्त चर तथा अचर प्राणियों में मोह उत्पन्न करने के लिए है। उन्हें निरन्तर ऐसी ही कल्पनाओं में लगे रहने दो। किन्तु जब इन सारे वैदिक शास्त्रों का सामूहिक विश्लेषण किया जाता है, तब निष्कर्ष यही निकलता है कि भगवान् विष्णु ही एकमात्र पूर्ण पुरुषोत्तम भगवान् हैं।"
(Lord Shiva instructs Parvati- Padma Purana. 4.99.26) , So prabhu ji, Lord Shiva himself says, only " Hari Sarvottam ".
All glories to Jagat guru Sripada Madhvacharya ki jaya ❤ Jay Srila Prabhupada. Hare Krishna danwat pranam .
CAN YOU PLEASE TELL THAT
WHY SRI VISHNU GOT HIS SUDHARSHNA FROM SRI SHIVA ? ALSO IN THE SHIVA PURAN IT IS STATED THAT SRI VISHNU WORSHIPPED SHIVA AND THEN SRI SHIVA OFFERED THE SUDHARSHANA TO SRI VISNU ?
WHY DID SRI VISHNU DID THIS ?
Also why Sri Vishnu and Sri Bramha fought for Who is Supreme?
Please clear my Confusions 🙏
Haraye Namaha.
These are Shaiva arguments, which have been debunked by Svaami Vijayeendra Teertha Shripaadagalu, in Shaiva Sarvasva Khandanam, Nyaayamauktikamaala. You can find it on our E-Library: elib.bhaktideets.org/
@@bhaktideets Very Very thanks
I shall always indebted unto you and Sri AnandaTirtha Bhagavadpadacharya 🙏🏼
@@bhaktideets Does It have any English translation?
Haraye Namaha.
Yes, we just recently translated and published it on our website. Just go that page and press "Download translation" to get the PDF.
@@bhaktideets Thanks for your support. Wish you may you success in preaching the message of Sri Madhva ❤️
Is this partial work of the Nyaayamauktiamaala of Sri Vijayendra Teertharu ? Is the complete work available in English?
but why did bhagwan cut lord shiva head during indra yagna isnt he parama bhakt of vishnu ??
Haraye Namaha.
It was Indra who did so, overpowered by his Antaryaami, ie. Shri Vishnu. It's a different incident. And Shiva was temporarily overcome by tamas, as in the case of asura aavesha sometimes among Devatas. This is mentioned in the Chhaandogya Upanishad, Khanda 1, Prapaathaka 2.
@@bhaktideets dhanyawad hare Krishna 🙏🙏🙏
Maharaj please i beg for forgiveness from the bottom of my heart at your divine Lotus feet i insulted you i deeply regret it i beg for forgiveness i desparately beg online because i could not physically fall at your Lotus feet. Forgive me
Haraye Namaha.
When did you do anything?
Why does puranas contradict each other?
Haraye Namaha.
Simply because of either:
(1) Kalpa or Manvantara bheda
(2) Those sections of the Puraanas are intentionally misleading, to delude Taamasikas and Raajasikas. This is stated in the Varaaha and Padma Puraanas.
एषं सृजाम्याशु योजनान् मोहयिष्यति ।
त्वं च रुद्र महाबाहो मोहशास्त्राणि कारय ॥
अतथ्यानि वितथ्यानि दर्शयस्व महाभुज ।
प्रकाशं कुरु चात्मानामप्रकाशं च मां कुरु ॥
(Janaardana said): “Now I shall create such things as would soon engender doubt and misconception among men. Mighty-armed Rudra, you too better have Moha Shaastras produced (by Dadichi, etc.). Let the people be made to see what is not true and what is against truth. Make yourself well-known to the world and spread darkness with regard to Me,” thus is known from this declaration of the Varaaha Puraana.
-Varaaha Puraana, Adhyaaya 70, Shlokas 35-36 (Quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in his Brahma Sutra Bhaashya, Adhyaaya 1, Paada 1, Sutra 1; Shri Yamunacharya, in Aagama Pramaanya)
परमो विष्णुरेवैकस्तज्ज्ञानं मोक्षसाधनम् ।
शास्त्राणां निर्णयस्त्वेष तदन्यन्मोहनाय हि ॥
ज्ञानं विना तु या मुक्तिः साम्यं च मम विष्णुना ।
तीर्थाऽदिमात्रतो ज्ञानं ममाऽधिक्यं च विष्णुतः ॥
अभेदश्चास्मदादीनां मुक्तानां हरिणा तथा ।
इत्यादि सर्वं मोहाय कथ्यते पुत्र नान्यथा ॥
(Shri Shiva said to Skanda): “Vishnu alone is the Highest. Knowledge about Him is the means of moksha. This is the purport of the Shaastras. Anything other than that causes delusion. The ideas stating that moksha is attainable without jnaana, my equivalence with Vishnu, jnaana being obtained by visiting holy places, my superiority over Vishnu or non-difference between devotees like me or mukta jeevas with Vishnu these lead to delusion and to nothing else, O putra.”
-Padma Puraana, Uttara Khanda, Adhyaay 71, Shlokas 114-116 (Quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in the Mahaabhaarata Taatparyya Nirnnaya, Adhyaaya 1, Shlokas 53-55)
@@bhaktideets Thank you for answering
Narasimha's "fightng back" is all Madhwist and Iyengarist fiction. In the Sanskrit scriptures composed in Aryaavarta Sharabha killed Narasimha- end of story (in the skanda purana version, they both die).
Haraye Namaha.
😂🤣 Nice to see you coping here, Mr. Deepthinker/SK/Swaminath Kumar. But no matter what you say, the Shaastras and granthas of bhaashyakaras are clear on that.
@@bhaktideets Madhwist adherent of scripture-forger Madhwa deletes criticism of his hateful, lying cult.
@@bhaktideets the moron is happy with his "acharya"'s lies.
Haraye Namaha.
Where did I delete your comments other than your mere hate comments LOL? And yes, I'm happy with our Aachaaryas' "lies," because they're still proveable by the Shaastras and have been shown to be, by ample scholars both from the past and current times. 😂
The Shiva Purana mentions Sharabha attacking Narasimha and immobilizing him. He thus quelled Narasimha's terrifying rage. It is also said that Sharabha then decapitated and de-skinned Narasimha so Shiva could wear the hide and lion-head as a garment. The Linga Purana and the Sharabha Upanishad also mention the mutilation and murder of Narasimha. After the mutilation, Vishnu assumed his normal form and retired to his abode, after duly praising Shiva. It was from here on that Shiva came to be known as "Sharabeshamurti" or "Simhagnamurti".
The Padma puran, narada Pañcarātra and mantra Mahrnava tantra, mentions Narasimha as the conqueror of Vīrabhadra (Śarabha), while as per Satvata tantra and Vāsudeva Sahasranāma of Padma puran/Maharnava Tantra, Narasimha wears the head of Rudra. LakshminarayanaSamhita mentions How Śarabha rupa is a grace of Viṣṇu alone, while Sesa Samhitā talks of iconography of Narasimha, as Tearing apart both Śarabha and Hiranyakashipu, hence being called "Śarabha samhara moorthy".
Haraye Namaha.
That's exactly why we disagree with the Shaiva Puraanas, since they are Shaiva Shaastras. Also, the Sharabha Upanishad is a bogus Upanishad which hasn't been quoted or mentioned by ANY Vidvaans in relation to the Narasimha-Sharabha incident. On the contrary, they've literally mentioned that the idea of Sharabha subduing Narasimha is avaidika and contradicts the Vedas.
Actually in Shaiva puranas Veera Bhadra was defeated by Narsimha and Shiva had to come as Sharaba and then in ganesh puran then a very intense fight happened between them and maa durga Poured a nectar which calmed Narsimha and then he was defeated
@@bhaktideets Why can't it be taken as kalp bhed
in different kalp there are different and similarities in stories