Meanwhile Jagadguru Sri Adi Shankaracharya in his Vishnu Sahasranama Bhasya: 245: Narayanah The S'ruti (Tai. Up., 3-1) says : “Whom they approach, and enter.” Brahma Vaivarta Puran : “As he is the Beat of Naras, he is called Narayana.”
I think he is saying puranas as mythology because there is no evidence to prove them real. But we get evidences of ramayana and Mahabharata. So its better to assume them in that way rather than believe them blindly. Sometimes it's better to assume something if it contradicts reality. Because these are ancient stories and it's difficult to prove their reliability in this era but we can take morals from these stories rather than focusing on plot itself. It's fine to do to avoid blind faith about something we do not know. Remember this is Dharmic faith, where change is accepted and something that contradicts with the time and place can be rejected. We are not fixated to anything but these our guiding tools to seek consciousness. Our culture is like flowing water which never bound itself to anything but flow with time.
It's not difficult to disprove something that allegedly happened in the past. That's what science is for. That's how we know that all the rumours and old wives' tales - about anything in historical science-fiction globally - are false. Science exists to disprove the past. That's the only we know how to discover the future. Otherwise scientists will make the same mistakes they did in 500AD by unwittingly repeating it. It's very hard to predict the future, but it's very easy to explain the past. The concept of academic peer review began approximately between AD 1730 and 1945. In that time lakhs of experiments were run and tested worldwide for the first time. This forces objectivity. You have Hindus brainwashed to believe certain things in their own history that they feel afraid to disprove. When it goes to a Chinese scientist, he has no incentive to lie. And he says it's false. Then a Chinese Confucian myth is sent to Switzerland, and they disprove that. And it goes round and round. Trust me, as a scientist myself, when I say there's absolutely nothing about ancient history that is "yet to be proven" or "disproven". You don't go around disproving every single myth one at a time. Then science would never move forward. Instead we develop a massive framework of scientific theory - such as Gravity or Relativity - and then use those same rules and formulas to disprove many myths all at once. If a myth says that humans can't jump off the ground and stay fixed in the air, then we automatically discard every single myth that contains a rishi levitating. Then there are fields like anthropology, historigraphy, archaeology and engineering that tell us if the rest of that myth is likely to be false too. And it always is.
To those people and Mr lakhani it's not so exaggerated , it's all true with some sugar coating , I can give one example once when swami vivekanda was in Italy if iam not wrong would go to a library and read several books with in few hours and days , the librarian thought that swami vivekanda was pretending to read books, the librarian then questioned from the books which vivekamda read and swamji surprisingly answere left right all questions from the book the librarian was stunned and asked swamji then swamiji replied it's all because the power of continence that's bramacharya mind gains immense super powers
Sir Pls tell us what to learn from the story (mythology) in Srimad Bhagavatam Canto 8, Chapter 32. Why to believe in the scripture(s) which you know full of exaggerations?
He passed away, but thats his point - dont take it too literally. Dont even cherry pick out of context either. There's nothing to believe or anything but to understand what and which scripture serves its purpose for which topics.
Sir then what is the purpose of reading Purans . How as a hindu can i benefit from reading our great Purans. How to interpret Purans with there hidden message .
That is why we need a Rishi, that is why in ancient times people were not allowed to read purana, brother read Upanishads don't read purana, puranas are just smritis, Upanishads and vedas are shrutis(truth)
Because you don’t. The Puranas are a bunch of fables which have been expanded upon and given life whenever Hinduism has faced major issues from other religions. They come millennia after the vedas, Upanishad’s and epics. They sometimes spit in the face of the gods it’s actually disrespectful
@@rameshraju4784 Chandogya Upanishad 7.1.4 : - ❝Indeed, Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva are the names of the four Vedas. The Itihasas and Puranas are the fifth Veda.❞
@@cheriicheriiladybhai koi mana nhi kar rha but purana's ki kahaniyo ko bahut baar manipulate Kara gya he infact during British raj max Muller ne Hindu's ka faith khatam karne ke liye puranas ko hi manipulate kiya tha samjha purana's pe ankh band karke bharosa Mt Kiya kar bhai
näma va rg-vedo yajur-vedah sama-veda ätharvanaš caturtha itihasa puranah pañcamo vedänām vedah Indeed Rg, Yajur, Sama, and Atharva are the names of the four Vedas. The Itihasas and Puranas are the fifth Veda. This is also supported by Chandogya Upanishad 7.1.2, Atharva Veda 11.7.24,Vyasa Smriti 4.45, Taittireya Aranyaka 2.9. Generally scholars from other religious faiths fear to debate on basis of Puranas and itihasas as Bhagavad Gita is a part of Mahabharata. From above references it is clear that they are fifth
@@sairajanvekar6925 puranas are always smritis, ithihasas are fifth vedas but still they are smritis, geetopanishad(baghavad geeta) is a shruti, so in essence puranas are to be read only after reading the shrutis
Puranas can be messy so better forcus on Upanishads, Brahma Sutras and Gita. May also suggest Agamas and Tantras for rituals, deity worship, practices, philosophies etc.
PurA-navam-bhavati is the meaning of Puran means old is destroyed and new is created. People who do not know basic meanings are giving lectures on dharam 🤣 . Puran dose not mean " MYTHLOGICAL " .18 mahapuranas are like putting micriscop on vedas and its knowledge and telling them in common men's or masses language to convey the knowledge of veda with the help of " POETRY DRAMA AND MYTHLOGY TO CONVEY THE PHILOSOPHY OF VEDAS AS WELL AS SOME SCINCES OF VEDAS. IN " NATAYA SASHTRAS WHICH IS ALSO SOMETIMES REFERED AS 5TH VEDA ALONG WITH BHAHVAT GITA IT IS SAID THAT IF YOU WANT TO CONVEY HISTORY OR KNOWLEDGE OR BOTH TO BE REMEMBERED AND REFFERED FOR LONG TIME AMONGST HUMANS THEN IT IS IMPORTENT TO USE POETRY MYTHLOGY AND ", NATYA ", MEANS DRAMA WITHOUT DISTURBING THE CORE THAT IS HISTORY OR KNOWLEDGE OR BOTH AND THUS IF ONE SEES BE IT PURANAS OR ITIHASSA ( HISTORY LIKE RAMYAN AND MAHABHARAT ) AND MANY OTHR WRITINGS OF ANCIENT BHARAT YOU WILL FIND DRAMA POETRY AND MYTHLOGYICAL US USED LIBRARLY SO THAT IT CAN REACH MASSES AND HOLD THEIR ATTANTION. THUS IF ONE UNDERSTANDS THIS THEN ONE WILL TRY TO TAKE MAXIMUM KNOWKEDGE OUT OF 18 MAHA PURANAS . FOR E.G SAMUDRA MANTHAN WHICH IS DISPLAYED AS ART EFFECT AT BANGKOK AIRPORT OR SOME AIRPORT IN FAR EAST IS ONE OF THE MOST FAMOUSE STORIES TOLD. ON THE FACE OF IT YOU WILL WITHOUT DOUBT PUT IT IN CLASS OF MYTHLOGY BUT YOU THEN GO UPPWARDS IN CLASS OF ANCIENT LEARNINGS YOU WILL FIND GEOLOGY WHERE YOU WILL REALISE ITS TALKING ABOUT RISE OF HIMALAYA WHEN BHARAT SUB CONTINENT CLASHED WITH ASIA WHERE SHESH NAAG IN THE STORY ARE TECTONIC PLATES FROM ONE END TO ANOTHER OF HIMALAYA MOUNTAIN RANGE AND HIMALAYA AS WE KNOW IS STILL RISING AND TAIL OF SHESH NAAG WAS WITH DEVAS SO THEY GOT EVERYTHING THUS FROM BHARAT TO EAST WARDS THERE WAS PROPERIETY THROUGH WATER GREENER ETC AND MOUTH OF SHESH NAAG IS WEST OF HIMALAYA WITH ASURA AND STORY SAYS WHAT EVER GOODIES CAME OUT ON THAT SIDE SHESH NAAG ATE IT UP THUS YOU HAVE NOTHING MEANS DESERTS. NOW IF YOU SEE ZOHRASTRUANS OF PERSIANS IRAN FOR THEM ASURAS ARE GOOD GUYS WHO WEAR ON WEST OF HIMALAYAS OR AT MOUTH OF SHESH NAAG AND DEVAS ARE VILLAINS BUT IN BHARAT AND EAST DEVAS ARE HEROS. NOW AS YOU GROW LITTLE MORE IN YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND THINKING THEN SAME STORIES WILL TELL YOU SAMUDRAMANTHAN IS MANTHAN OF SAMUDRA LIKE MIND OF YOURS WHICH IS LIKE BIG .OCEAN WHERE THOUGHTS ARE LIKE CONSTANT WAVES OF OCEAN AND WHEN YOU DO CHURNING OF IT FIRST NEGSTIVITY WILL COME OUT MEANS POISON WHICH SHIV TOOK AWAY AND EVENTULY YOU WILL ATTAIN AMRIT MEANS KNOWLEDGE WHICH IS MORTAL. ONE STORY 3 MEANINGS AT DIFFRENT STAGES OF YOUR INTLECTUELS CAPACITY THATS HOW YOU READ AND LEARN ANCIENT WISDOM OF SASHTRAS PURANAS AND OTHER ANCIENT WRITINGS MAINLY WHICH ARE PHILOSOPHICAL WHILE WHICH ARE FOR SCINCE THEY ARE STRAIGHT IN YOUR FACE LIKE SURYA SIDHANTA OR CHARAK OR AYURVEDA OR VASTU OR GANIT JHOTISH MEANS ASTRONOMY OR FALIT JHOTISH WHICH MEANS ASTRLOGY AND OF COURSE MATHAMATICS OR MASTER CLASS OF PANINI SASHTRAS WHICH ARE ORIGINS OF TODAYS COMPUTOR CODES WHICH IS RECORDED HISTORY. MUCH MORE TO SAY BUT.... SOME OTHR TIME. ADIOS..
Writing some stuff in all caps doesn't make the stuff true, first learn to write your thoughts correctly. Have you read the puranas?? The most contradictory texts that contradict with each other when taken literally.
Puran doesn't mean Mythology sir. Puran just means extremely old. There are many interpolations and exaggerations in the stories but they are inspired from real occurences and the morals of these stories must be imbibed accordingly.
Yahi hota jab paschima ka hava zada lag jata hai to bahle aap un vedo ke baare me padhte hai aur logo ko batate bhi hai lekin padhna aur batane se ye nhi ho jaega ki aap us bhaav bhoomi ko sparsh kar le jis gehrae se likhe gye the ved aur puran yah apka matra brahm hi hai ki apne vedo ko samjha hai ho sakta hai samjha ho lekin sumdra ki lahr hi samjhe hai na ki uski gehrae ki aur aap samaj bhi nhi sakte kyuki aap kabhi us sthithi par pahuch hi nhi sakte sambhav nhi agar pahuchna hai to kisi pustak ya tark ka shara leni ki avashkta nhi balki sadhana ka talwaar hath me hona chahiye aur aap sadhak nhi hai isleye aap bhi bramh hai aur prakariti sadhak par apna niyantran nhi dal sakti sambhav nhi tumne tapasya ka tivra pravah hota hai aur jisko aap mythology kah rhe hai aap bharat ke hi to meri salay hai ki aap kabhi himlaya ke durgam sthano par jae aur un yogiyo se mile vo batenge apko kya aur kaise sambhav h
You must watch his other videos also he is a true hindu and a follower of vedanta . Vedanta is the same philosophy followed by swami vivekananda. He never rejects hindu or vedas or puranas. He is a follower of esoteric Hinduism. Plz don't judge anyone by watching only one video ..half knowledge is very dangerous.
Sir Where does it say puran is mythology , if possible plz give nirukta or vyakaram source... I heard puraan means ancient & latest at the same time.. What will you say about katho upnishad nachiketa going to yam.. You are extremely wrong aa per my current knowledge, Gold helmets its a minute thing...u have chosen to believe that they only wore skins & furs , (without proof of its non existence) If u read Mahabharat of vyaas u'll find even motor boats & spacecrafts , but people find it hard to believe as of now without any direct proof of its existence or non existence.... Shaastra pramaaan is 1 proof but ur intellect wont agree to it , atleaat u could have said "i dont know"... instead u said its impossible its exaggeration... My recommendation- vyas Mahabharat , swami govind dev Mahabharat vyaakhya on youtube , Next ur may suggest u to say , yog sutra vibhuti paad is also exaggeration...
Purana are just mythologies, which were made to make it easier to convey the message of Vedas and Upanishads through stories but unfortunately people thought that puranas are the ultimate truth , think hu yourself, in puranas there is even a story where lord Shiva was possessed by kaam vasna and he forced an apsra for s*x but it was lord Vishnu in that apsra form and story continues where lord Shiva tries to seduce her , do u really think this is true?
@@bpnk5237 it was only used for specific purpose...and only handful of people knew the mantra..and you have to travel with the chariot with your army...bcz viman could carry only 4 or 5 people...only god or people with divine power could use the viman...
I’m a western Irish Hindu 🙏
For a true hindu it doesn't matter where u are. He/she sees u as a human that's all :)
my dear friend ,
you are not irish or british...
you are a soul....
That's wonderful 😊👍 may the universe bless you with the blessings you have provided for others!
This man is a gem 💎 he literally knows physiology of youths even I had lost interest in my god and dharma after reading garud puran
Sir the true light you ✨ have enlighten the listeners, you are greatly appreciated sir💐
thanks i was finding this explanation for so long
पुराणों में symbolism का Use किया गया है
Ppl are loosing faith bcs of all these stupid stories. Pls stop propagating puran
@@PrithaBhowmick-cb1cz
Right
Agree 💯%
Thank you
Meanwhile Jagadguru Sri Adi Shankaracharya in his Vishnu Sahasranama Bhasya:
245: Narayanah
The S'ruti (Tai. Up., 3-1) says : “Whom they
approach, and enter.” Brahma Vaivarta Puran : “As he is the
Beat of Naras, he is called Narayana.”
Story and purpose and message are different. Tom Jerry and fairy tale can't be justified but purposes is always great and justified.
I think Word Quran is also straight derived from puranas ,,legendary stories only
Lol
😜😂😂
I think he is saying puranas as mythology because there is no evidence to prove them real. But we get evidences of ramayana and Mahabharata. So its better to assume them in that way rather than believe them blindly. Sometimes it's better to assume something if it contradicts reality. Because these are ancient stories and it's difficult to prove their reliability in this era but we can take morals from these stories rather than focusing on plot itself. It's fine to do to avoid blind faith about something we do not know. Remember this is Dharmic faith, where change is accepted and something that contradicts with the time and place can be rejected. We are not fixated to anything but these our guiding tools to seek consciousness.
Our culture is like flowing water which never bound itself to anything but flow with time.
The problem is with andhbhakts
It's not difficult to disprove something that allegedly happened in the past. That's what science is for. That's how we know that all the rumours and old wives' tales - about anything in historical science-fiction globally - are false.
Science exists to disprove the past. That's the only we know how to discover the future. Otherwise scientists will make the same mistakes they did in 500AD by unwittingly repeating it.
It's very hard to predict the future, but it's very easy to explain the past.
The concept of academic peer review began approximately between AD 1730 and 1945.
In that time lakhs of experiments were run and tested worldwide for the first time. This forces objectivity.
You have Hindus brainwashed to believe certain things in their own history that they feel afraid to disprove. When it goes to a Chinese scientist, he has no incentive to lie. And he says it's false. Then a Chinese Confucian myth is sent to Switzerland, and they disprove that. And it goes round and round.
Trust me, as a scientist myself, when I say there's absolutely nothing about ancient history that is "yet to be proven" or "disproven". You don't go around disproving every single myth one at a time. Then science would never move forward.
Instead we develop a massive framework of scientific theory - such as Gravity or Relativity - and then use those same rules and formulas to disprove many myths all at once.
If a myth says that humans can't jump off the ground and stay fixed in the air, then we automatically discard every single myth that contains a rishi levitating.
Then there are fields like anthropology, historigraphy, archaeology and engineering that tell us if the rest of that myth is likely to be false too. And it always is.
@@PrithaBhowmick-cb1cz shut up librandu
To those people and Mr lakhani it's not so exaggerated , it's all true with some sugar coating , I can give one example once when swami vivekanda was in Italy if iam not wrong would go to a library and read several books with in few hours and days , the librarian thought that swami vivekanda was pretending to read books, the librarian then questioned from the books which vivekamda read and swamji surprisingly answere left right all questions from the book the librarian was stunned and asked swamji then swamiji replied it's all because the power of continence that's bramacharya mind gains immense super powers
Sir
Pls tell us what to learn from the story (mythology) in Srimad Bhagavatam Canto 8, Chapter 32.
Why to believe in the scripture(s) which you know full of exaggerations?
He passed away,
but thats his point - dont take it too literally. Dont even cherry pick out of context either.
There's nothing to believe or anything but to understand what and which scripture serves its purpose for which topics.
I think you are taking about Shiv Mohini Leela
So even in ancient times and recent times there were men with yogic and mystical powers ,
Sir then what is the purpose of reading Purans . How as a hindu can i benefit from reading our great Purans. How to interpret Purans with there hidden message .
That is why we need a Rishi, that is why in ancient times people were not allowed to read purana, brother read Upanishads don't read purana, puranas are just smritis, Upanishads and vedas are shrutis(truth)
Because you don’t. The Puranas are a bunch of fables which have been expanded upon and given life whenever Hinduism has faced major issues from other religions. They come millennia after the vedas, Upanishad’s and epics. They sometimes spit in the face of the gods it’s actually disrespectful
@@rameshraju4784 we are not in ancient times. Leave purans which can't be proven in this age.
@@rameshraju4784
Chandogya Upanishad 7.1.4 : -
❝Indeed, Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva are the names of the four Vedas. The Itihasas and Puranas are the fifth Veda.❞
@@cheriicheriiladybhai koi mana nhi kar rha but purana's ki kahaniyo ko bahut baar manipulate Kara gya he infact during British raj max Muller ne Hindu's ka faith khatam karne ke liye puranas ko hi manipulate kiya tha samjha purana's pe ankh band karke bharosa Mt Kiya kar bhai
And I do agree that there were fake gurus and conman .
I can't make ppl understand such facts 😢
näma va rg-vedo yajur-vedah sama-veda ätharvanaš
caturtha itihasa puranah pañcamo vedänām vedah
Indeed Rg, Yajur, Sama, and Atharva are the names of the four Vedas. The Itihasas and Puranas are
the fifth Veda.
This is also supported by Chandogya Upanishad 7.1.2, Atharva Veda 11.7.24,Vyasa Smriti 4.45, Taittireya Aranyaka 2.9. Generally scholars from other religious faiths fear to debate on basis of Puranas and itihasas as Bhagavad Gita is a part of Mahabharata. From above references it is clear that they are fifth
So you mean puranas are real events ?
@@sairajanvekar6925 puranas are always smritis, ithihasas are fifth vedas but still they are smritis, geetopanishad(baghavad geeta) is a shruti, so in essence puranas are to be read only after reading the shrutis
@@rameshraju4784 any prove 😂.... You ppl are totally crazy ..
@@PrithaBhowmick-cb1cz you are not even eligible to talk about sanatan dharm if you don't even know this basic differentiation of Shruti and smriti
@@INFINITY-X- there is no proof to say the puranas we have is the puranas that vedas talk about
Yes , when ppl can't understand facts they become nastik
Read the Shrutis. Puranas were manipulated over time
Puranas can be messy so better forcus on Upanishads, Brahma Sutras and Gita.
May also suggest Agamas and Tantras for rituals, deity worship, practices, philosophies etc.
You are right max Muller manipulated puranas many times
PurA-navam-bhavati is the meaning of Puran means old is destroyed and new is created. People who do not know basic meanings are giving lectures on dharam 🤣 . Puran dose not mean " MYTHLOGICAL " .18 mahapuranas are like putting micriscop on vedas and its knowledge and telling them in common men's or masses language to convey the knowledge of veda with the help of " POETRY DRAMA AND MYTHLOGY TO CONVEY THE PHILOSOPHY OF VEDAS AS WELL AS SOME SCINCES OF VEDAS. IN " NATAYA SASHTRAS WHICH IS ALSO SOMETIMES REFERED AS 5TH VEDA ALONG WITH BHAHVAT GITA IT IS SAID THAT IF YOU WANT TO CONVEY HISTORY OR KNOWLEDGE OR BOTH TO BE REMEMBERED AND REFFERED FOR LONG TIME AMONGST HUMANS THEN IT IS IMPORTENT TO USE POETRY MYTHLOGY AND ", NATYA ", MEANS DRAMA WITHOUT DISTURBING THE CORE THAT IS HISTORY OR KNOWLEDGE OR BOTH AND THUS IF ONE SEES BE IT PURANAS OR ITIHASSA ( HISTORY LIKE RAMYAN AND MAHABHARAT ) AND MANY OTHR WRITINGS OF ANCIENT BHARAT YOU WILL FIND DRAMA POETRY AND MYTHLOGYICAL US USED LIBRARLY SO THAT IT CAN REACH MASSES AND HOLD THEIR ATTANTION. THUS IF ONE UNDERSTANDS THIS THEN ONE WILL TRY TO TAKE MAXIMUM KNOWKEDGE OUT OF 18 MAHA PURANAS . FOR E.G SAMUDRA MANTHAN WHICH IS DISPLAYED AS ART EFFECT AT BANGKOK AIRPORT OR SOME AIRPORT IN FAR EAST IS ONE OF THE MOST FAMOUSE STORIES TOLD. ON THE FACE OF IT YOU WILL WITHOUT DOUBT PUT IT IN CLASS OF MYTHLOGY BUT YOU THEN GO UPPWARDS IN CLASS OF ANCIENT LEARNINGS YOU WILL FIND GEOLOGY WHERE YOU WILL REALISE ITS TALKING ABOUT RISE OF HIMALAYA WHEN BHARAT SUB CONTINENT CLASHED WITH ASIA WHERE SHESH NAAG IN THE STORY ARE TECTONIC PLATES FROM ONE END TO ANOTHER OF HIMALAYA MOUNTAIN RANGE AND HIMALAYA AS WE KNOW IS STILL RISING AND TAIL OF SHESH NAAG WAS WITH DEVAS SO THEY GOT EVERYTHING THUS FROM BHARAT TO EAST WARDS THERE WAS PROPERIETY THROUGH WATER GREENER ETC AND MOUTH OF SHESH NAAG IS WEST OF HIMALAYA WITH ASURA AND STORY SAYS WHAT EVER GOODIES CAME OUT ON THAT SIDE SHESH NAAG ATE IT UP THUS YOU HAVE NOTHING MEANS DESERTS. NOW IF YOU SEE ZOHRASTRUANS OF PERSIANS IRAN FOR THEM ASURAS ARE GOOD GUYS WHO WEAR ON WEST OF HIMALAYAS OR AT MOUTH OF SHESH NAAG AND DEVAS ARE VILLAINS BUT IN BHARAT AND EAST DEVAS ARE HEROS. NOW AS YOU GROW LITTLE MORE IN YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND THINKING THEN SAME STORIES WILL TELL YOU SAMUDRAMANTHAN IS MANTHAN OF SAMUDRA LIKE MIND OF YOURS WHICH IS LIKE BIG .OCEAN WHERE THOUGHTS ARE LIKE CONSTANT WAVES OF OCEAN AND WHEN YOU DO CHURNING OF IT FIRST NEGSTIVITY WILL COME OUT MEANS POISON WHICH SHIV TOOK AWAY AND EVENTULY YOU WILL ATTAIN AMRIT MEANS KNOWLEDGE WHICH IS MORTAL. ONE STORY 3 MEANINGS AT DIFFRENT STAGES OF YOUR INTLECTUELS CAPACITY THATS HOW YOU READ AND LEARN ANCIENT WISDOM OF SASHTRAS PURANAS AND OTHER ANCIENT WRITINGS MAINLY WHICH ARE PHILOSOPHICAL WHILE WHICH ARE FOR SCINCE THEY ARE STRAIGHT IN YOUR FACE LIKE SURYA SIDHANTA OR CHARAK OR AYURVEDA OR VASTU OR GANIT JHOTISH MEANS ASTRONOMY OR FALIT JHOTISH WHICH MEANS ASTRLOGY AND OF COURSE MATHAMATICS OR MASTER CLASS OF PANINI SASHTRAS WHICH ARE ORIGINS OF TODAYS COMPUTOR CODES WHICH IS RECORDED HISTORY. MUCH MORE TO SAY BUT.... SOME OTHR TIME. ADIOS..
Are those real characters?
Writing some stuff in all caps doesn't make the stuff true, first learn to write your thoughts correctly. Have you read the puranas?? The most contradictory texts that contradict with each other when taken literally.
Purans are very contradictory, read the upanishads
And puranas mean that which is very ancient .
Puran doesn't mean Mythology sir. Puran just means extremely old. There are many interpolations and exaggerations in the stories but they are inspired from real occurences and the morals of these stories must be imbibed accordingly.
How do u know that they are inspired from real stories? I am just asking
😂😂😂😂 reason why atheism is increasing. Leave all these and follow Vedic sanatan.
No they are not @@phoenixj1299
Gillette the best a ram can get
Lol what happened to all the whales.
Yahi hota jab paschima ka hava zada lag jata hai to bahle aap un vedo ke baare me padhte hai aur logo ko batate bhi hai lekin padhna aur batane se ye nhi ho jaega ki aap us bhaav bhoomi ko sparsh kar le jis gehrae se likhe gye the ved aur puran yah apka matra brahm hi hai ki apne vedo ko samjha hai ho sakta hai samjha ho lekin sumdra ki lahr hi samjhe hai na ki uski gehrae ki aur aap samaj bhi nhi sakte kyuki aap kabhi us sthithi par pahuch hi nhi sakte sambhav nhi agar pahuchna hai to kisi pustak ya tark ka shara leni ki avashkta nhi balki sadhana ka talwaar hath me hona chahiye aur aap sadhak nhi hai isleye aap bhi bramh hai aur prakariti sadhak par apna niyantran nhi dal sakti sambhav nhi tumne tapasya ka tivra pravah hota hai aur jisko aap mythology kah rhe hai aap bharat ke hi to meri salay hai ki aap kabhi himlaya ke durgam sthano par jae aur un yogiyo se mile vo batenge apko kya aur kaise sambhav h
You must watch his other videos also he is a true hindu and a follower of vedanta . Vedanta is the same philosophy followed by swami vivekananda. He never rejects hindu or vedas or puranas. He is a follower of esoteric Hinduism.
Plz don't judge anyone by watching only one video ..half knowledge is very dangerous.
Can you prove all these mythological incidents in today's life?
Sir
Where does it say puran is mythology , if possible plz give nirukta or vyakaram source...
I heard puraan means ancient & latest at the same time..
What will you say about katho upnishad nachiketa going to yam..
You are extremely wrong aa per my current knowledge,
Gold helmets its a minute thing...u have chosen to believe that they only wore skins & furs , (without proof of its non existence)
If u read Mahabharat of vyaas u'll find even motor boats & spacecrafts , but people find it hard to believe as of now without any direct proof of its existence or non existence....
Shaastra pramaaan is 1 proof but ur intellect wont agree to it , atleaat u could have said "i dont know"... instead u said its impossible its exaggeration...
My recommendation- vyas Mahabharat , swami govind dev Mahabharat vyaakhya on youtube ,
Next ur may suggest u to say , yog sutra vibhuti paad is also exaggeration...
Ok then how did Agastya drank the ocean?
If they had spacecraft why people still drove horse chariot.
Purana are just mythologies, which were made to make it easier to convey the message of Vedas and Upanishads through stories but unfortunately people thought that puranas are the ultimate truth , think hu yourself, in puranas there is even a story where lord Shiva was possessed by kaam vasna and he forced an apsra for s*x but it was lord Vishnu in that apsra form and story continues where lord Shiva tries to seduce her , do u really think this is true?
@@bpnk5237 it was only used for specific purpose...and only handful of people knew the mantra..and you have to travel with the chariot with your army...bcz viman could carry only 4 or 5 people...only god or people with divine power could use the viman...
@@bpnk5237 cuz they don't read that
So our puranas are not so exaggerated, there were men and rishis with super natural powers .
😂😂😂😂 yes but where is swarg loka?
Puranas literally mean literature, first learn Sanskrit before deciphering.