SMOKE WARNING ONBOARD | DHL A300 Returns to Amsterdam

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 кві 2023
  • 23/MAR/2023
    DHL Airbus A300 performing flight from Amsterdam to Leipzig was on the initial climb after takeoff when the pilots declared MAYDAY reporting a smoke warning indication and would need to level off and return immediately.
    _____________
    Your support is really important and appreciated to keep these videos coming! =)
    -- / vasaviation
    -- paypal.me/VASAviation
    Become a VIP member of VASAviation! -- / @vasaviation
    Join VASAviation's Discord -- / discord
    Twitter/Facebook/Instagram -- @VASAviation
    Audio source: www.liveatc.net/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 101

  • @VASAviation
    @VASAviation  Рік тому +81

    Amsterdam dudes always so cool!

    • @johnnydipp9994
      @johnnydipp9994 Рік тому +21

      I like how they nearly always have emergency aircraft use a discreet frequency at AMS, it makes comms so much easier for the crew.

    • @Avgeek_germain
      @Avgeek_germain Рік тому +4

      @Johnny Dipp I mean its also easier for the controller since frequent talking is required usually

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 Рік тому +1

      Yes, indeed.

  • @dgonL
    @dgonL Рік тому +128

    The EZY62TP asking if he was still cleared for takeoff shows great professionalism and situational awareness by those pilots.

  • @Derderderheisst
    @Derderderheisst Рік тому +59

    Amsterdam deals with emergencies just like normals ops. Sooo smooth!

  • @davidisaacson9543
    @davidisaacson9543 Рік тому +83

    Love how they get assigned a discrete frequency. ATC was so good

    • @laurencekoetsier
      @laurencekoetsier Рік тому +16

      The discrete freq is one of the lessons learned from the crash of el al 1862 in 1992 in a residential flat. Too much distractions with hand offs between controllers. I think it's great!

    • @jesperdiercks981
      @jesperdiercks981 Рік тому +2

      @@laurencekoetsier ELAL indeed was handed off 3 times or something

  • @commerce-usa
    @commerce-usa Рік тому +42

    Better safe than sorry is always a good idea. Glad it worked out well for the crew.

  • @dsy1081
    @dsy1081 Рік тому +26

    I absolutely love that Amsterdam puts emergencies on a discrete frequency. Fantastic work all around.

  • @raspar6
    @raspar6 Рік тому +9

    Love the way they interact - all different nationalities and accents, and they all work together so professionally and clearly

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 Рік тому +4

      Indeed - a Dutch ATC, a German and a French Pilot.

  • @miguelr1784
    @miguelr1784 Рік тому +10

    Kudos to that guy on the discrete freq, being proactive and offering help in advance.

  • @dre-aguto
    @dre-aguto Рік тому +17

    Professionals all around

  • @Rhinozherous
    @Rhinozherous Рік тому +9

    00:31 Amsterdam has some runways available indeed :) ATC is so calm, professional AND friendly!

  • @MargieM10
    @MargieM10 Рік тому +12

    Such a polite exchange!

  • @elcastorgrande
    @elcastorgrande Рік тому +32

    As near perfect as it gets. Complete situational awareness, not one wasted word. I can imagine a US ATC asking for souls on board by age, price of fuel by mililiters in quatloos, and other ephemera.

    • @iatsd
      @iatsd Рік тому +13

      Oh, don't be too harsh! US ATC would have asked all that in less than 0.5 of a second of talking, so it can't be too bad, eh? ;) :)

  • @JohnDoe-zw6to
    @JohnDoe-zw6to Рік тому +4

    0:11 Imagine being the controller, all's going well and you suddenly hear an aircraft go "MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY" with the airbus master warning bell screaming in the background...controller must've shat a brick.

  • @Avgeek_germain
    @Avgeek_germain Рік тому +16

    4:07 little slip up from the pilots, they used the old callsign :P (which was changed to postman a few weeks before incident)

    • @desmond-hawkins
      @desmond-hawkins Рік тому +8

      ATC also call them Eurotrans 1491, a bit later (4:54). *edit:* they changed on March 1st, 2023.

    • @Avgeek_germain
      @Avgeek_germain Рік тому +6

      @@desmond-hawkins yup, probably because they read back as eurotrans. But ye, they were probably doing checklists and stuff so its understandable the pilots got it wrong, it was only 3 weeks in with the new callsign and theyve probably used the old one too often

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 Рік тому

      Yes, but that was a minor fault, the ATC got it mixed up at some point, too.

    • @Avgeek_germain
      @Avgeek_germain Рік тому +1

      @@NicolaW72 yup. And I mean i don't blame them. Both sides were busy with handling the situation

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 Рік тому

      @@Avgeek_germain Indeed.

  • @Hans_R._Wahl
    @Hans_R._Wahl Рік тому +4

    Thank you very much for picking this incident up!🙂👍 Nice to see that everything went out well here.

  • @Avgeek_germain
    @Avgeek_germain Рік тому +3

    Ah, you managed to at least get audio for thisone :P
    Greetings from Germain from messanger :P

  • @moomae1
    @moomae1 Рік тому +5

    Yeah, just because there's no visible smoke in the cabin doesn't mean it isn't elsewhere.

  • @fToo
    @fToo Рік тому +16

    Postman is a great callsign ... not quite as good as Speedbird or Shamrock ... but nearly !

    • @draij023
      @draij023 3 місяці тому

      ... well, I could here something ringing inside the Postman.

  • @letto18
    @letto18 Рік тому +6

    Well done! NIce to know that in 2023 that the A300 is still in service with DHL, granted this would be a newer variant (A300-600RF) compared to the one that was hit by a SAM and successfully landed after losing all hydraulic systems in 2003 (A300B4-203F)

    • @Hans_R._Wahl
      @Hans_R._Wahl Рік тому +1

      D-AEAH is 25 years old aircraft, so one of the late built ones. It was delivered first to Japsn Airlines in 1998, then converted into a freighter in 2011 and is flying for EAT Leipzig since 2012.
      EAT Leipzig still operates a fleet of 22 A 300.

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 Рік тому +1

      @@Hans_R._Wahl Yes, indeed. It´s one of the largest A300-Operator which has remained.

  • @Cloudwalk9
    @Cloudwalk9 Рік тому +2

    "We have runways available" I'd certainly hope so...

  • @tomcomer8957
    @tomcomer8957 Рік тому +14

    High chance could be carrying flowers that create condensation and trip the smoke detectors.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna Рік тому +1

      A huge amount of flowers get flown into Amsterdam from Kenya. I’m not sure of the z Dutch export market.

    • @tomcomer8957
      @tomcomer8957 Рік тому

      @@EdOeuna spring tulips this time of year but you are right most would be imported to AMS.

    • @johnnydipp9994
      @johnnydipp9994 Рік тому +1

      @@EdOeuna The world's biggest flower auction is in Aalsmeer, which is right next door to AMS.

    • @Itamem0no
      @Itamem0no Рік тому

      99% of the freight carried by them is parcels, in the 4 years I've worked on EHAM, i think i've never seen them load flowers.

  • @bensmethurst3379
    @bensmethurst3379 Рік тому +1

    I see nobody has quite got used to the new PostMan callsign, still accidently using EuroTrans.

  • @RadioNul
    @RadioNul Місяць тому

    I thought since El Al in 1992 that Schiphol doesn't offer RWY27 to emergency inbounds.

  • @EdOeuna
    @EdOeuna Рік тому

    A bit of a radar vector then straight back in. Not much silence would have been trimmed from the original audio to make this. A text book response to an emergency on departure.

  • @othername1000
    @othername1000 Рік тому +4

    Taxied to the runway? Did they take off again after fire brigade inspection?

  • @IanIsDifferent
    @IanIsDifferent Рік тому

    Why did BCS changed their callsign from eurotrans to postman?

  • @ahm_767
    @ahm_767 Рік тому +2

    Ah yes, they have indeed changed their callsign from Eurotrans to Postman.

  • @aviation_muc480
    @aviation_muc480 Рік тому +19

    Since when did DHL change their callsign from 'Eurotrans' to 'Postman', should be fairly recent?

    • @firestormhd9885
      @firestormhd9885 Рік тому +24

      We changed it at the beginning of March. But it still needs time to get into our heads😂 Oh and, we‘re not DHL: EAT Leipzig is the correct name!

    • @aviation_muc480
      @aviation_muc480 Рік тому +12

      ​​​​​@@firestormhd9885 I can only imagine😅 Also sorry about the misidentification, I get quite confused at times correctly identifying the many DHL sub-carriers (DHL Air UK, EAT Leipzig, Southern Air, Polar etc.)
      Thanks for the insight and best regards!

    • @SpearFisher85
      @SpearFisher85 Рік тому +3

      My wife just recently worked for DHL Costa Rica, I'll have to ask her lol nice catch

    • @OtakuAviators
      @OtakuAviators Рік тому +7

      @@firestormhd9885 ATC apparently still needs to get it in their heads as well as they also used the 'Eurotrans' callsign one time.😄

    • @Hans_R._Wahl
      @Hans_R._Wahl Рік тому +2

      @@OtakuAviators Indeed.

  • @antonik2674
    @antonik2674 Рік тому +1

    I can't get over how horrible the 'postman' callsign is for EAT. Even the pilot ended up saying eurotrans a couple times

  • @MCDU81
    @MCDU81 Рік тому +1

    Amsterdam is one of the best regarding handling emergencies. In the USA the controllers can only waste your time with asking the same stuff over and over again.

  • @ovaskerri
    @ovaskerri Рік тому +4

    Its "Leipzig EDDP"

  • @dabooom1296
    @dabooom1296 Рік тому +3

    Where is Elipzig?😄

  • @chrisschack9716
    @chrisschack9716 Рік тому +1

    Neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor gloom of night stays these aircraft ... smoke warnings, however, do.

  • @JSFGuy
    @JSFGuy Рік тому +2

    Full Stop...

  • @wadesaxton6079
    @wadesaxton6079 Рік тому +6

    Textbook

  • @JohnSmith-fy3jy
    @JohnSmith-fy3jy Рік тому

    didn't mayday aircraft will alway get priority? Why they put them in No.2 on landing ?

    • @johnnydipp9994
      @johnnydipp9994 Рік тому +1

      They had priority, but there was also an aircraft closer to the runway, about to touchdown, which made this one number two.

    • @JohnSmith-fy3jy
      @JohnSmith-fy3jy Рік тому

      @@johnnydipp9994 it kinda make sense, but there a chance if No.1 aircraft have some issue or miss the exit and can't get out of runway in time that going to make mayday aircraft go around

    • @johnnydipp9994
      @johnnydipp9994 Рік тому

      Sidestep to 18C is probably the backup plan if 18R isn't cleared in time.

    • @dtonnaer
      @dtonnaer Рік тому

      ​@@johnnydipp9994 18C is being resurfaced and has been closed for weeks ;-)

  • @aviationmanchester152
    @aviationmanchester152 Рік тому

    I thought BCS - Was Eurotrans not Postman 🤔

  • @S_Paoli
    @S_Paoli Рік тому +1

    what's the difference between declaring an emergency and saying Mayday, Mayday, Mayday?

    • @lyaneris
      @lyaneris Рік тому +7

      Mayday is understood by everyone and not used in regular communication. It catches everyones attention (see the departing aircraft asking about the clearance) and frees up the frequency. In practice, both can be used, but a mayday doesn't leave as many questions. Also, when declaring an emergency in the US, it often would have been a PAN-PAN - urgency (medicals, backup system failures, controlled shutdown of one engine, etc)

    • @iflyuwalk
      @iflyuwalk Рік тому +2

      one is proper, the other ain't.

    • @S_Paoli
      @S_Paoli Рік тому

      @@iflyuwalk which is which? 😂

    • @yarati4584
      @yarati4584 Рік тому +4

      ​@@S_Paoli MAYDAY or PANPAN are the proper terms, as agreed by international standards.

    • @robertl426
      @robertl426 Рік тому +5

      Mayday x 3 and Pan Pan x 3 are the internationally understood terms. In the USA pilots often say "declaring an emergency" rather than Mayday for some reason. Works fine in US airspace, but in other countries I think it would be better if they used Mayday or Pan Pan. Some American pilots do use those terms though, I've heard it a few times.

  • @ScenicIreland80
    @ScenicIreland80 Рік тому

    A300 in the thumbnail?

  • @D4rthDuck
    @D4rthDuck Рік тому

    A330 or a300?

  • @maxbarko8717
    @maxbarko8717 Рік тому +1

    It always amazes me how English speakers have difficulties to write a German name correctly. Even in one sentence. Leipzig butchered to Elipzig.😮 1:02

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 Рік тому

      Victor is Spanish.🙂

    • @maxbarko8717
      @maxbarko8717 Рік тому +1

      @@NicolaW72 oh ok, probably from Barlezona. Haste luego.

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 Рік тому

      @@maxbarko8717 😅

  • @moisgolis
    @moisgolis Рік тому +4

    Mayday or PAN PAN ....

    • @theonlywoody2shoes
      @theonlywoody2shoes Рік тому +18

      As a mere PPL, I was told that a Mayday was appropriate if you are experiencing loss, or imminent loss of aircraft control for any number of different reasons including: aircraft upset by turbulence; pilot incapacitation;
      spatial disorientation; control surface or structural failure;
      engine failure that will lead to a forced landing or ditching etc, or any indication of an onboard fire.
      The smoke alarm is no different to a fire alarm in a building; if it indicates an issue get out, and resolve any problems arising from a safe location.
      A Mayday can always be downgraded to a Pan if needed, but better to be safe than “toasty”.

    • @robertl426
      @robertl426 Рік тому +3

      Mayday is correct in this situation, smoke (potential fire) is one of the worst things to happen on an aircraft.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna Рік тому +1

      Now consider there are just 2 pilots and no access to any of the cargo areas. They can’t determine the source of the smoke either, so returning is the best option. Smoke/fire/fumes checklist is written in blood, and all aircraft OEM’s appear to agree with the one principle of land at nearest suitable airport.

    • @jamesphillips2285
      @jamesphillips2285 Рік тому

      @@EdOeuna Sounds like one of them did take a peek. They were saying no smoke seen in later transmissions.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna Рік тому +6

      @@jamesphillips2285 - more likely that the cargo smoke notification disappeared as opposed to someone visually checking. No sane pilot would get out of their seat, with a smoke incident, shortly after departure.