ESA videos are nice but plz add some more explanation thoses kind of video should have somoene explane in details for 20minutes at least, we want more !
@FutureAIDev2015 there are so many issues that can go wrong with a satellite or any mission to space that you eliminate those you can. Having dust or mites or normal air debris floating around can damage components from chips to hinges that need to open perfectly. It's super cost effective, clean room technology is good. Imagine spending all the money on flight costs just to have it screwed up because a hair stopped a crucial hinge. What an easy preventable waste.
What I learned from this video is that ESA trusts in those iiyama monitors for monitoring rocket launches, whereas I didn't yet trust them as one of my desktop monitors!...
Congratulations! I thought maybe ESA would play with our emotions a bit before confirming successful launch, you know, to build a suspense, but that's hardly important :)
Why do they wear medical clothing. gloves and hair covering when working on the satelite? If it is to prevent hairs and other fibers from somehow damaging the satelite why is that guy not wearing something to prevent hair from his beard from felling on the satelite?
It's a clean environment. There's usually sensitive optics and precision instrumentation on a satellite, foreign particles are bad for that. It's common to coat materials, again contamination is bad for that. Mostly though it's not for the satellite, very high precision machinery needs clean rooms. Think microchip manufacture.
Here we go, the Vega-C. A little fossil of a rocket. While SpaceX is busy perfecting reusable launch systems, we Europeans are still watching an outdated matchstick fly. The gap in innovation between Europe and the US has never been clearer than in space exploration.
Brawo! Świetna robota! A tak poza tym to wesołych świąt i szczęśliwego nowego roku!
ESA videos are nice but plz add some more explanation thoses kind of video should have somoene explane in details for 20minutes at least, we want more !
The explanation is in its description
don't think they are nice. they look like from the 90's. They should get some new social media skilled people on board.
congrats
Great ESA. Congratulations. ❤❤❤
Merci! :)
Bravo ! Merci ! Grazie !
Yes. I like it. More, more, more.
¡Enhorabuena!
complex work well done 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
I'm curious, why does the environment around a spacecraft while it's under construction need to be kept so exceptionally clean?
@FutureAIDev2015 there are so many issues that can go wrong with a satellite or any mission to space that you eliminate those you can. Having dust or mites or normal air debris floating around can damage components from chips to hinges that need to open perfectly. It's super cost effective, clean room technology is good. Imagine spending all the money on flight costs just to have it screwed up because a hair stopped a crucial hinge. What an easy preventable waste.
Nice music choice
yall shoulda used vision by pyramid
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
What I learned from this video is that ESA trusts in those iiyama monitors for monitoring rocket launches, whereas I didn't yet trust them as one of my desktop monitors!...
That was a long day...💔💔💔
❤❤
Congratulations! I thought maybe ESA would play with our emotions a bit before confirming successful launch, you know, to build a suspense, but that's hardly important :)
❤💕🚀🚀💕❤
👍👽👍
🚀🤝🏻🛰
I'm supposed to be writing about the Golden Records but here I am
The music and editing make this feel like a comedy/parody video
Go Europe go!
Europe #1, usa #2, Finland #3.
The ESA and NASA need to learn how to cover a rocket launch like the private launch companies. Very dry, boring, with little telemetry or video.
NON REUSABLE = NON SENSICAL
Why do they wear medical clothing. gloves and hair covering when working on the satelite? If it is to prevent hairs and other fibers from somehow damaging the satelite why is that guy not wearing something to prevent hair from his beard from felling on the satelite?
It's a clean environment. There's usually sensitive optics and precision instrumentation on a satellite, foreign particles are bad for that. It's common to coat materials, again contamination is bad for that. Mostly though it's not for the satellite, very high precision machinery needs clean rooms. Think microchip manufacture.
Also at 0:58 you'll see the satellite fuelling crew gearing up in hazmat suits because they will be handling the highly toxic hydrazine propellant
its one use throw away rocket. Bet still cost more than just using SpaceX Falcon 9
But at least ESA isn't lining the pockets of a fascist oligarch.
Throw away rocket. Bleh
Here we go, the Vega-C. A little fossil of a rocket. While SpaceX is busy perfecting reusable launch systems, we Europeans are still watching an outdated matchstick fly. The gap in innovation between Europe and the US has never been clearer than in space exploration.
Get a life musk fanboy
Wat praat je poep trouwens jankert. Nederlandse zelfgepepen muskboy
Cry about it
And still the Vega is much cheaper than a Falcon 9...
oh nooo, a spacex troll/fanboy, whatever shall we do