What if the Whites Won the Russian Civil War? | Alt History

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • An alternate history of Russia in which the White Army win the Russian Civil War and crush the Communists!
    If you want a video explaining the logic behind the scenario tell me in the comments down below!
    Please like and subscribe!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @ME262MKI
    @ME262MKI 2 роки тому +1557

    Ah world without communism.... What a dream

    • @kinggodzilla309
      @kinggodzilla309 2 роки тому +115

      Some nations would still turn Communist but not as many

    • @gengarzilla1685
      @gengarzilla1685 2 роки тому

      I don't know about that. Without Mussolini around to be inspired by and to be a baseline with which his own movement is formulated, would Hitler have established the German Reich?
      I'm thinking this is the definitive early end for communism; its radical ideological crusaders within Russia are killed, the movement is totally demonised and delegitimised, and by the modern day it's known as a failed idea that ultimately never got a stable foothold anywhere.

    • @adamkerman475
      @adamkerman475 2 роки тому +202

      @@kinggodzilla309 I doubt it, most communist nations only had communist governments because of soviet “support”.

    • @kinggodzilla309
      @kinggodzilla309 2 роки тому +41

      @@adamkerman475 I said some nations would turn communist like small Countries not big ones.

    • @adamkerman475
      @adamkerman475 2 роки тому +62

      @@kinggodzilla309 There was only really 2 “large” Communist countries and those were the Soviets and the Chinese and you could argue that the Chinese only won because of soviet support and most “small” countries only had communist revolutions at all because of soviet existence and provocation.

  • @voxbour6018
    @voxbour6018 2 роки тому +391

    There would be no way for Poland to ally with Whites, because both Reds and Whites directly opposed Polish Independence.

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +3

      Yes
      But they may help White and force White to give them independence and some land, White will be weaker than Soviet, Poland may even not need to make war against White and get lands in 1922's size.

    • @niepowaznyczlowiek
      @niepowaznyczlowiek 2 роки тому +27

      @@mappingowo3966
      Piłsudski refused to ally with the whites in 1919 and in 1920

    • @kerim.s8801
      @kerim.s8801 2 роки тому +45

      agreed. This video makes no sense either. France could have not attacked germany like in our own timeline. There was no offensive plan to invade germany to that extend.

    • @gengarzilla1685
      @gengarzilla1685 2 роки тому +3

      In this timeline then, another change should be that he never comes to power.

    • @5Penkets
      @5Penkets 2 роки тому +1

      Well Poland is considering “white allied” since they mainly fought the Reds and the Blacks.
      Also I don’t understand how did Russia annexed All of Eastern Europe, it looks like if whites won their army somehow got better or something

  • @coopereddie9612
    @coopereddie9612 2 роки тому +647

    You can restore the whites in no step back hoi4 and eventually the tsar

  • @phantom894
    @phantom894 2 роки тому +307

    Meanwhile in another universe: What if the Reds won the Russian Civil War?

    • @kirillassasin
      @kirillassasin 2 роки тому +78

      It would be kinda interesting seeing comments like “Reds were much better, I wish they won it”

    • @justacat2
      @justacat2 Рік тому +2

      ​@@kirillassasinlol

    • @Yo-ps2pf
      @Yo-ps2pf Рік тому +17

      @@kirillassasin in the end the Reds actually were better

    • @icedoutgecko9607
      @icedoutgecko9607 10 місяців тому +8

      @@Yo-ps2pf no

    • @Yo-ps2pf
      @Yo-ps2pf 10 місяців тому +14

      @@icedoutgecko9607 Economically and militarily yes, look up statistics and history

  • @Plys3n
    @Plys3n 2 роки тому +944

    Honestly, I can't come up with the reason of Germany committing such a suicidal act. If they had the backing of the Uk and Italy, I might believe it, but it's just unbelievable by themselves.

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +167

      In my opinion, if Russia is that strong, the British may stay neutral even join the side of Germany.
      And Finland, Poland, and the Baltic states(Especially Lithuania in the three of Baltics) won't willingly be part of Russia or Russian puppets.

    • @janfranek9782
      @janfranek9782 2 роки тому +7

      true

    • @plusxz821
      @plusxz821 2 роки тому +5

      I agree bud

    • @Amen-Magi
      @Amen-Magi 2 роки тому +1

      The communists industrialized Russia so that Russia empire could not build a single tank. The Nazis defeated them

    • @beanclan12345
      @beanclan12345 2 роки тому +16

      What I also (imo) find weird is that UK and France went to war. Originally UK and France would give Sudetenland to Germany to *prevent* the war. And Germany would never agree with being split up in Hannover etc like they did in the Morgenthau plan.

  • @jamessparkes4215
    @jamessparkes4215 Рік тому +470

    This is the first alternate history of Russia that I've seen that isn't hypocritically pro-western and actually makes logical sense. Good job

    • @ChipKorp
      @ChipKorp Рік тому +35

      Чел, это сделал западный чел который даже не углублялся в гражданскую войну и сделал так что после победы белых вернулась монархия и появился какой-то царь Кирилл, ты тупой?

    • @kirilll7806
      @kirilll7806 Рік тому +1

      ​@@ChipKorpзакрой свой рот ❤❤❤

    • @ChipKorp
      @ChipKorp Рік тому +3

      @@kirilll7806 С чего бы?

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  Рік тому +49

      If Russia had plot armour, there would've been no October Revolution in the first place.

    • @kirilll7806
      @kirilll7806 Рік тому +1

      @@Azarian771 shut up commie

  • @Cesme8008
    @Cesme8008 2 роки тому +431

    I like this video but the one things that I have an issue with is that Russian industrialization was not included. Russia was a largely rural nation after the civil war.And would have need to massively industrialize in order to compete with the western powers .

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +80

      I skim over it, mainly for time reasons, if I'd made the video longer I'd have included more on the industrialisation.

    • @ivanserov1846
      @ivanserov1846 2 роки тому +39

      1929: begins
      Jazz music stops. And with it,the industrialization.

    • @plusxz821
      @plusxz821 2 роки тому +20

      The soviets literally killed their most productive peasants

    • @ivanserov1846
      @ivanserov1846 2 роки тому +30

      @@plusxz821 No one killed the Serednyaks,they were mostly integrated into collective farms without much issues.

    • @thepat6369
      @thepat6369 2 роки тому +4

      @@ivanserov1846 Is a Serednyak a middle class farmer?

  • @alifaiman3578
    @alifaiman3578 2 роки тому +200

    I'm actually jealous for those who live in this exact timeline. It's not as messy as ours 😢

    • @socialistunionofafrica9263
      @socialistunionofafrica9263 2 роки тому +25

      My brother is a scientist and i'm an engineer so i think i can create you know a machine to take us to another timeline will take about 3 years but just wait

    • @kinggodzilla309
      @kinggodzilla309 2 роки тому +10

      @@socialistunionofafrica9263 Is that true

    • @dianafuenzalida3035
      @dianafuenzalida3035 2 роки тому +5

      @@socialistunionofafrica9263 hahahhahahahhahahaha

    • @mongolianares
      @mongolianares 2 роки тому +7

      @@socialistunionofafrica9263 yessssssssssssss take me there

    • @Onetruenugget
      @Onetruenugget 2 роки тому +3

      Same I feel very mad and envious but maybe you can try reality shifting to a reality with this timeline but it's not confirmed that if shifting is real or not

  • @aguywithahelmet
    @aguywithahelmet 3 місяці тому +15

    The end result looks slightly like 1984…

  • @Kakapuuks
    @Kakapuuks 2 роки тому +5

    The baltic states would of not rejoined the russian empire. Estonia already got it’s independence before the russian civil war ended. This video is not accurate at all.

  • @KenKenston
    @KenKenston 5 місяців тому +16

    Проблема в том, что непонятно какие именно "белые" победили бы. Потому что белыми называли вообще всех, кто против большевиков: бунтующих матросов в Кронштадте с которых началась эта революция, Колчака, Деникина, социал революционеров, которые интернационал пели, анархистов, бунтующих крестьян и тд.

    • @avansi5621
      @avansi5621 3 місяці тому +3

      Не совсем. Бунтующие крестьяне - эти зелёные, а анархисты - чёрные.

  • @Matrix_985
    @Matrix_985 2 роки тому +151

    The based Russia we all wanted.

    • @The_Devil_Chariot
      @The_Devil_Chariot Рік тому +11

      Yeah

    • @Ipolitelyaskyoutodie
      @Ipolitelyaskyoutodie Рік тому +2

      Based lambda symbol enjoyer

    • @The_Devil_Chariot
      @The_Devil_Chariot 7 місяців тому

      @@Ipolitelyaskyoutodieit was actually the psi symbol on my profile

    • @MihailzRO
      @MihailzRO 5 місяців тому +3

      All based except being a little unrealistic and the useless demand of Bessarabia

    • @DwarfVG
      @DwarfVG 4 місяці тому +2

      кроме русских рабочих

  • @wisigun
    @wisigun 2 роки тому +18

    Как бы я хотел чтоб так было

  • @Печеньсколбасой
    @Печеньсколбасой 4 місяці тому +7

    На самом деле Россию бы ждала раздробленность и анархия в стиле Китая 30 и воевали бы с Германией как Китай с Японией ,то есть прое***в буквально 2/5 страны. Да и даже в лучшем случае никто монархию не стал бы возвращать, т.к. многие белые были республиканцами. Так что в случае возвращения царя в белой маршрутке начался бы сущий кошмар .

  • @CAProductions051
    @CAProductions051 2 роки тому +86

    I would prefer this world over the present world.

  • @spirit_edit6320
    @spirit_edit6320 Місяць тому +5

    Why video end at 9:11😭🦅

  • @ivanserov1846
    @ivanserov1846 2 роки тому +74

    Well,the video is certainly good,the plot is here,map,music-everything fits
    But history...well,as a man from post-soviet space,I will try to make some things here
    1-Death of Lenin would surely be tragic,but it wont be like Kaiserreich scenario,mostly because it was the centralized AgitProp which ran the propaganda and news for the soldiers so the Red Army while perhaps would collapse,would do it much much later than 1920
    2-A number of new allies.
    Definetly not Finland,hello Karelian uprising of 1921
    Ukraine-Pavlo Skoropadsky regime was not by any means pro Russian and stood for Ukrainian independence,just like regimes in Belarus and especially the Baltics
    3-Poland
    Closed within the borders of the XVI century, cut off from the Black and Baltic Seas, deprived of the land and mineral wealth of the South and Southeast, Russia could easily pass into the state of a second-rate power, unable to seriously threaten the newfound independence of Poland. Poland, as the largest and strongest of the new states, could easily secure a sphere of influence that would extend from Finland to the Caucasus Mountains-
    - Y. Pilsudsky
    Point 2 and 3 combined to the new annexations made by Russia
    4-Constitutional monarchy
    A good half of Russian white generals supported the idea of the Republic and fought for the constitutional assembly.
    5-Tsar Nicholas and grand Knyaz Mikhail
    Both would be dead,Nicholas shot with the first signs of Whites victory and Mikhail Alexandrovich would be abducted from the hotel and killed.
    6-Resurgent Germany in 1925.
    In 1925. Resurgent.
    7-Panslavism was mostly approved only by Russia and Yugoslavia,Czechs,Poles,Bulgarians and for some reason here-Greeks had none of that. Even if due to religion or hate for Turkey(Which would also lose more of its north east because of Russian intervention and of course-supporting Armenians,and Ataturk having harder time fighting without his only supplier-Soviet Russia)
    Greece was stuck between England who for all times did not wanted Russians close to Medditeranian and Russia.
    Also yes,Finland declared its independence with the abolition of Russian monarchy,so why is it in Russian alliance.
    8-They would not neglect Russian agricultural base
    1500 tractors for entire Russia by 1913,most of them are used as cargo transport that is what I call a neglect of industry.
    No mechanization,no fertilizers,a third of land is still in the hands of aristocracy,and neither the tsarist government,nor the provisional seemed to care,and it was one of the first reasons why peasants rebelled.
    9-Preventing soviet era famines
    They would still face the famine of Transvolgan region neverthenless.
    And now would have the repetition of famines of 1840.1842.1873, 1880, 1883,1891,1905 and 1911 and what leaded to them-epidemics(thanks to no mass vaccinations which the Soviets irl enacted),no literacy programs for spreading methodics(Thanks comrade Lenin for LikBez-liquidation of illiteracy), hoarding of grain by the Kulaks(Forced confiscation of grain started in 1916 for the exact same reason)
    And the fundamental land problem which collectivization solved. Peasants are not farmers,peasants send to the market only part of their products while the rest feed their families. When father dies,his land is splitten between the sons. And what happens next-correct,more men,same amount of men-the amount of products to the market drops.
    You can counter argument me by presenting Stolypin reform-but no,the reform was one of the fuels for the peasant riots as it tried to break apart their many-centuries old communal farming and made them vulnerable to kulaks who most peasants hated.
    10-Kulaks as political opposition
    I see that Whatifalthist content made it here. Which is very sad because its simply wrong.
    Lets start with definition of who were the Kulaks,no not the most hard working-such honor belonged to Serednyaks or Middle peasants.
    Kulaks got a lot of their wealth through banal usury,and lending their land and quipment at high interest rates or corvee works.
    Why Soviet government started collectivization only in 1927-the answer is simple. Bread preparation programmes for the cities and exports failed because....right,Kulaks never agreed on state-imposed prices and simply held grain until the price would rise.
    Plus,the collectivization allowed for massive mechanization of agriculture.
    Most of peasant lands were of small square,2-3 hectares. Kulaks-more but not astronomically high. Peasants did not had the money to properly buy any agricultural equipment,price is simply too high. And cant use it properly-most of the land plots are too small. Collectivization simply did what was done in the west just at a much higher speed-concentration of assets.
    11-Slightly slower
    No,it will be a lot slower,to get the necessary rates of industrialization,Russian Empire will have to do what it did in 1900s-Export grain but starve
    "We wont eat enough,but will export!"
    -Alexander Vyshnegradsky,minister of finances.
    The Russian Empire ranked 5th in the world according to the index of industrial production. This is what supporters of the monarchy are mostly proud of. Production really developed. But this is due to the backwardness of the country, where the vast majority are peasants. The late development of industry gives a high growth rate in any country.
    One of the main factors-effect of low base. Where even slight increase of production would result in high percentage increase. And while economy progresses those percent numbers are more and more complex to achieve.
    Example: To double yearly production of cars from 100,we would need to add in 100,then 200,then 400,then 800 and the numbers would grow leading to lower and lower growth by percents.
    But there are subtleties in the development itself, which are not always mentioned by the apologists of tsarism. Yes, the resources necessary for the development of industry were extracted. Mining was one of the successes of the Russian government, but the trouble is that the resources were mainly used not for development, but for sale. Most often they were mined by foreign companies.
    The Swedish company "Nobel" not only extracted oil on the territory of RE, but also used its own equipment, with the help of which production increased many times, but clearly not in the interests of Russia. This was beneficial primarily to foreign capital. Investments in oil production are an illustration of the influence of foreign capital on the Russian Empire. From 1910 to 1914 . Britain invests 134.6 million rubles, and domestic investments for the same period - 9.58 million rubles (Vavilin I. Foreign capital in Russia. L.: Priboy, 1925. p. 67).
    It was foreign capital that monopolized the extraction of individual resources. British and French capitalists were engaged in the production of platinum, their share in the Russian Empire was 90%. Foreign capital actively participated in almost any production and extraction of resources. And RE became a sales market, a source of resources and cheap labor.
    Domestic industry developed poorly. Basically, equipment and machinery were bought in the West. In many spheres from engineering to chemistry estimate Russia's dependence in terms of production capacity from 70 to 100% (Rozhkov N. Russian History in comparative historical Coverage (fundamentals of social dynamics) Leningrad - Moscow, 1926-1928, vol. 12, pp. 166-167).
    Therefore, when they remember "prosperity", do not forget that the lion's share of everything that was mined simply went to the west, because foreign corporations owned the production. There was still development in isolation from them, and impressive, but this is clearly not the 5th place among all countries of the world.
    12-Much wealthier population
    Where do I even begin...with 40% literacy? With 27% child mortality before 1 year? With medium life expectancy of 35 years? From child labour which took 17% of all labour force?
    10.000 people-1.3 doctors
    Pay for 1914-most prosperous year was only from 10-25 rubles for 60 hours work week. England by comparison-41 for 52 hours.Germany:31 for 56,US:72 for 53.
    No centralized healthcare,and only a nascent central education system which was for most people outside of Moscow and petrograd simply too expensive.
    "If we recall how much of the national income comes annually to the treasury, how much is absorbed by the clergy and other social groups that are not involved in the production of material values, we cannot but come to the conclusion that the share of the main creators of the national income accounts for an even smaller share of it."
    -Rubakin. Russia in numbers.1912
    13-Social programs
    Labourers of Lensk mines would like to hear that story.
    13.5
    Both you and Whatifalthist forgot about one little detail in 1929 which caused entire world economy to collapse and Russian would collapse too.
    Not only because of global integration,but because the Reds succesfully cancelled all debts of Russian Empire,and I mean all of them-national debt,civilian debts and the Enormous War Debt.
    14-No purges
    I mean those generals already lost to Reds which didnt had many experts,while Whites got the cream of Russian officers.
    But I give you a credit for starting the war earlier and with aid of allies,because otherwise if things went down OTL,Russia would end up behind the Urals.
    15-Intimidate Moldova
    Hello ww3,Romania is guaranteed by France and England
    16-Chinese Republic
    Hello warlordism,but neverthenless-far better than Mao.

    • @Fortunato7
      @Fortunato7 2 роки тому +22

      Ay man, although it is not worth it to spend THIS much of your time commenting an entire essay on a random video, i would like to thank you because i read the whole thing and learned a fk ton of stuff

    • @whyamihere5732
      @whyamihere5732 2 роки тому +5

      Damn you brought the data

    • @hiredmurderer6228
      @hiredmurderer6228 2 роки тому +10

      Now this is a good dose of REAL history

    • @cortorrealjean6242
      @cortorrealjean6242 2 роки тому +8

      You just make my day Happy Merry Christmas

    • @ivanserov1846
      @ivanserov1846 2 роки тому +5

      @@HansleyLucky a really,really flawed one.
      Kulaks as political and not economic enemies
      Social programs during the great depression
      Anti-Russian regimes letting to annex themselves.
      I don't need to be a cook to say if something is wrong with the meal I am currently eating.

  • @Dark.Phoenix
    @Dark.Phoenix 2 роки тому +118

    Germany would've probably united by 1990 under Prussian rule, like in our timeline wiht West and East Germany. Königsberg would probably stay under Russian rule because it was a Baltic state originally tho.

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +18

      Though I think this video is unrealistic if the world truly comes to that situation, France and Britain may put west Germany and Austria together to build an economically strong Germany against Prussia which is in Russian control...

    • @Aureus_
      @Aureus_ 2 роки тому +11

      I think the russians in this timeline would treat königsberg nicely and the rest of Germany instead of the cruel ways they did in ours

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +5

      @@Aureus_ Maybe, Nazi didn't do much in this timeline

    • @Aureus_
      @Aureus_ 2 роки тому +3

      @@mappingowo3966 yea the war was relatively short and the russians weren't Bolsheviks

    • @samlosco8441
      @samlosco8441 2 роки тому +9

      Yeah I thought the dismantling of Germany was particularly unrealistic. I imagine that, without the duration and sheer brutality of WW2 in our timeline, Germany would have been treated more leniently at the negotiating table. I think they would still lose East Prussia to the Russians, but aside from that would remain a united nation - retaining Pommern and Upper/Lower Silesia.
      The difference this time being no Polish Corridor, a more fair treatment that would not create the bad taste of Versailles, and more watchfulness from both the Western Allies and Russia over Germany to ensure German irredentism doesn't rise again.
      Also an exodus of ethnic Germans from East Prussia, the Sudetenland and Danzig to the new German mainland, this time a much more peaceful affair due to the aforementioned lack of genocidal brutality that the Nazis brought to the war in our timeline, which brought inevitable violent reprisals against ethnic Germans at the war's end

  • @joaopedro4609
    @joaopedro4609 2 роки тому +36

    My English is not very good, so I used Google Translate. That video was interesting, but the setting is also extremely upbeat and fanciful. It is strange that no country reacted to Russian expansion (Crimean War) and that the White Government/Monarchy prevented the famine, with the Russian Empire being marked by mass famines and political persecution (not unlike the Soviet Union).

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +12

      No worries about using translate, glad you found the video interesting, and I can understand what you mean about it being upbeat, think of this as "best case scenario" preventing the famine would be easier without Stalin, though I admit there may be more resistance to Russian expansion. Thanks for your comment.

    • @comrade_commissar3794
      @comrade_commissar3794 7 днів тому +1

      @@patrioticbritishmapper8352The Russian empire was having a massive famine roughly at the rate of every six years. In this timeline there would be a lot more starvation and a lot less industrialisation. This Russia would not be able to win a war agains the Germans.

  • @indecisitivity1832
    @indecisitivity1832 2 роки тому +90

    The good ending

  • @ГеоргийТолмачёв-ф5в
    @ГеоргийТолмачёв-ф5в 2 роки тому +46

    As a Russian, I support this scenario more than the communist path👍

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +12

      Glad to have the Russian seal of approval 👍

    • @canaluludorel5838
      @canaluludorel5838 2 роки тому +4

      You're a chad rus

    • @gnas1897
      @gnas1897 Рік тому

      It's an impossible scenario. Your country would have been turned into a dismembered collection of Western controlled banana republics upon white victory.

    • @Yo-ps2pf
      @Yo-ps2pf Рік тому

      How old are you? literally a disgrace to all Slavs lol

  • @jamesbryanswan_aohi678
    @jamesbryanswan_aohi678 2 роки тому +34

    I miss Russian Empire so much,love Russka from USA 🇺🇸💖🇷🇺😍😘

    • @jamesbryanswan_aohi678
      @jamesbryanswan_aohi678 2 роки тому +14

      @Eternal Seventeen nah,I like Russian empire more than Soviet Union.

  • @blitzkrieg1941
    @blitzkrieg1941 2 роки тому +4

    The good ending

  • @The_Blessed_Regent
    @The_Blessed_Regent Рік тому +23

    As Russian: Best timeline ever!

    • @brf493
      @brf493 Рік тому +1

      Скорее как шкила три годика + навальнист-даунист

  • @CrunkusGlunkus
    @CrunkusGlunkus 4 місяці тому +4

    the video is good and all but there's no way that poland and finland would willingly support the russians. you can try to make an argument for finland but the poles didn't support the white or red army. and if you include the russian expulsion of jews + the large jewish population of poland at the time it wouldn't make sense at all.

  • @rathisuhh4198
    @rathisuhh4198 2 роки тому +8

    The good ending

  • @Kaban125
    @Kaban125 4 місяці тому +3

    Страна была бы разделена Антантой за долги, а может быть просто была бы завоеванна соседями...

  • @cocindaucocindau354
    @cocindaucocindau354 2 роки тому +97

    It is funny how in this scenario the Russian Empire takes half of the World and dosent even stop after, but yes it is fiction. Something like this, even if the Reds had lost, would never happen, and the Whites would have a colossal debt to the Western Allies even in the Civil war, not even mentioning new power hungry Nations to fight against, which truly desired land in the East, as for example, Romania, Poland, Czechoslovakia. Then Japan and the lands they occupied in the Civil war, plus the Japanese Imperialism, and the will to expand. Then Fascism in Germany, which was based not only against Communism, but against all Slavic Nations seen as Eastern Hordes. And many factors ,which would have reduced White Russia into ashes even before the 1950s. Not to even mention the Effects after the Civil war, the great Depression and the Crushing debt to the Americans, French and English for Aid and support in the Civil war.

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +10

      I agree with you, even White won the civil war, their power will decrease a lot and lose control of his neighborhood.
      Poland won't be supposed to be a Russian puppet, the Polish-Soviet war proves that.
      And White maybe even weaker than red at the same time with the different parallel spacetimes.
      Ukraine, Belarus, and the Baltic states would be independent, too.

    • @cocindaucocindau354
      @cocindaucocindau354 2 роки тому +2

      @@mappingowo3966 I truly believe that if the Whites would have won, even the Todays Russian Federation would not even exist, And the only Russian State that would exist if Nazi Germany would had lost the War in that Scenario, would be a Mini Russia in Europe, only with the lands mostly populated by the Russian People..

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +1

      @@cocindaucocindau354 I don't get what Mini Russia means

    • @cocindaucocindau354
      @cocindaucocindau354 2 роки тому +1

      @@mappingowo3966 Maybe the European Part of Russia until Volgograd.

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +3

      @@cocindaucocindau354 You mean Russia will lose its power and shrink to the European part of Russia, which does not include Ciscaucasus

  • @Science12197
    @Science12197 2 роки тому +38

    The world would be much more peaceful

  • @ME262MKI
    @ME262MKI 2 роки тому +6

    1:24 what a beautiful view

  • @nikolaireinard5466
    @nikolaireinard5466 2 роки тому +6

    Communist didn't exist, well i guess hitler will face to face with tsar

  • @jancerveny7502
    @jancerveny7502 2 роки тому +96

    Right after watching this video, I immediately gave like and subscribe.
    As Czech and patriot, I have always considered the question of whether Czechoslovakia should defend itself against Germany in 1938, when United Kingdom and France refused to help.
    I know that the vast majority of German tanks in 1938 were obsolete PzKpfw I. Furthermore, most of the German air force consisted of obsolete biplanes. And most importantly, they only had supplies of fuel and ammunition for one month.
    Half of the German army and up to two-thirds of the German generals regarded the attack on Czechoslovakia as stupidity.
    Czechoslovakia had a numerically weaker army, but our men were perfectly armed and trained, and especially determined to defend their homeland to the last breath, just like the Finns in 1939.
    Although it is said that in the event of war, Poland and Hungary would attack us - that is just a myth. Hungarian regent Miklos Horthy was afraid of Romanians and Polish leader Ignacy Moscicki was afraid of the Soviets.
    The Romanian army was much larger and stronger than the Hungarian. It even had dozens of our tanks LT 35, which at the time were among the best in the world.
    Although the Soviet Union had a non-aggression pact with Poland at the time, Stalin threatened to repeal the pact in the event of the Polish attack on Czechoslovakia. This would be an ideal opportunity for Stalin to reconquer Poland, which belonged to Russia 23 years ago.
    Therefore, I am convinced that we would successfully defend ourselves and the German army would be exhausted by their attack. If Hitler did not make a truce with Czechoslovakia in this case, he would be in danger of being forcibly removed. Then, sooner or later, there would be a civil war in Germany.

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +22

      Indeed, I think we screwed you over by not standing to fight, I think had we done so, it'd have been over in a year. I agree on Poland and Hungary not getting involved, the polish wouldn't want to lose the favour of the British and French in case of a future German or soviet invasion and I don't think Horthy would've been dumb enough to invade. Also thanks for liking and subscribing, great to have you joining us.

    • @justnatsuki9027
      @justnatsuki9027 2 роки тому +11

      Even though I'm Polish, i have to say that Czechs fell mainly because of Poland.
      In 1938 Poland and Czechoslovakia weren't allies, but their common ally was France. France asked Poland if it can send some troops on german border but Polish government refused. Instead of helping our ally and southern neighbour we chose to become "friend" of austrian painter by sending Czechs ultimatum to give back Zaolzie.
      Even Czechs historians like Jan Němeček and Eduard Stehlik say that Czechoslovakia did surrender because it was afraid of polish intervention and war with both Poland and Germany. Taking Zaolzie was the biggest mistake in whole interwar period.

    • @jancerveny7502
      @jancerveny7502 2 роки тому +6

      @@justnatsuki9027 It is true that if interwar Poland relinquished its claim to Zaolzie and helped Czechoslovakia, it would not be conquered by Germany and the Soviet Union a year later.
      But I think the Munich Agreement, on the other hand, is our fault. Interwar Czechoslovakia was very nationalistic, even though it was a democracy. Germans, Poles, Hungarians, and even Slovaks lived in appalling conditions, especially during the Great Depression, when they were most affected by unemployment.
      I further condemn the war in 1919. After we defeated communist Hungary, we should immediately find common ground with Poland. President Masaryk wanted Zaolzie to remain in Czechoslovakia at all costs, because of the coal-fired power plant and the railway connecting the Czechia and Slovakia. That's why the war for Zaolzie began.
      I think that if we handed over Zaolzie to Poland in exchange for an alliance, and helped you fight the Russian Bolsheviks, there would be an immortal alliance and friendship between us Czechs / Slovaks and you Poles.
      Unfortunately, President Masaryk and Edvard Benes were selfish idiots who cared more about politics than the happiness of nations.

    • @RainyGryphon
      @RainyGryphon 2 роки тому

      *UK and France not England and France

    • @bongomeister9965
      @bongomeister9965 2 роки тому

      If the Czechs chose to resist the Nazi regime would collapse, see the Oster conspiracy

  • @yourlocaliino
    @yourlocaliino 2 роки тому +91

    First time seeing this channel. Really like how you utilize maps to create a short, logical explanation as to how an alternate history may come about, rather than creating a thirty-hour verbal dissertation on why Myanmar sucks and could have been annexed in 1230 B.C by the Scottish Empire without any really solid reasoning.

    • @RedPawner
      @RedPawner 2 роки тому +8

      But Myanmar should be a Scottish colony

  • @_steamfunk_2271
    @_steamfunk_2271 2 роки тому +40

    If only this was the true world we lived in :(

    • @hiredmurderer6228
      @hiredmurderer6228 2 роки тому +9

      Ha,say that to Estajanov. Go back to kindergarden,stupid anticommunist.

    • @BruhBruh-nn6vc
      @BruhBruh-nn6vc 2 роки тому +3

      Ну ты и дебич конечно

    • @OverLord115
      @OverLord115 2 роки тому +22

      @@hiredmurderer6228 There's nothing wrong with being anticommunist :D

    • @iberia169
      @iberia169 2 роки тому +2

      I dont like communism, but such a polarized escenario wont be good either

    • @Onetruenugget
      @Onetruenugget 2 роки тому +2

      Same I wish that the Russian Empire still existed and India never partitioned, I'm sure the US and Russia would have some rivalry after world war 2 but they would probably have worked to together in advancements in technology like space travel, cure to cancer, significant industrialization etc as well as solving world hunger, protecting environment etc and with India never be partitioned it could have been a huge world player and would have been a major supporter and assistant of the US and Russia along with it being very developed and having an extremely low poverty rate but yet again we should be thankful that we were born in this timeline because we could have been born in bad timelines like a world destroyed by nuclear war and very primitive or in a world that is very undeveloped and many countries are under tyranny

  • @Raul_Menendez
    @Raul_Menendez 2 роки тому +14

    Basically we're in the bad timeline....

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +7

      Unfortunately yes

    • @gengarzilla1685
      @gengarzilla1685 2 роки тому +4

      I'd say we're in the neutral timeline. Bad timeline would be something like TNO.

    • @filipesugden1982
      @filipesugden1982 Рік тому

      ) ews destroyed Russia

    • @pro-hz7kx
      @pro-hz7kx 4 місяці тому

      Total nazi Germany victory would be worse, but yeah we live in a pretty grim outcome

  • @todeswalzer1184
    @todeswalzer1184 2 роки тому +6

    A bit random but BASED

  • @Garnou_Hargon35
    @Garnou_Hargon35 2 роки тому +24

    Russian empire: helps Poland
    Soviet Union: invade Poland

  • @RonaldTrumpOfficial
    @RonaldTrumpOfficial 4 місяці тому +2

    no way bro I remember this

  • @pierce7992
    @pierce7992 Рік тому +4

    He means white army not white people

  • @niallglundub2225
    @niallglundub2225 2 роки тому +4

    Interesting video.
    However Poland could no agree for Russian influences in there Country becauce Russia made Russification of Poland and generally was her Partitioner (sent away Polish patriots to Sibir, fight with Polish culture and nationality etc.)

    • @niallglundub2225
      @niallglundub2225 2 роки тому +1

      And Polish post 2 W.W border is terrible. Poland have half of Prussia, but no have Upper Silesia?

  • @Aureus_
    @Aureus_ 2 роки тому +6

    Good ending

  • @BrazilianDreemurr2008
    @BrazilianDreemurr2008 Рік тому +4

    The True Ending, a Perfect Russia and a Perfect World without Communism

  • @9fh099
    @9fh099 2 роки тому +4

    overall great video but I Think the Baltics would not be apart of Russia willingly. As well as Mideastern and North African would be historically why would Syria and Lebanon be independent because Russia not communist?

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +2

      Baltics are a maybe, some of the leadership were torn on staying independent plus I doubt the nationalist whites would let them stay independent. France let Lebanon go in 1939 or 1940 I think so Russia not being communist really wouldn't affect that, plus Syria was a mandate not a colony so they'd inevitably face pressure to give it up at some point

    • @Anti-Furry-tm4tr
      @Anti-Furry-tm4tr 2 роки тому +1

      @@patrioticbritishmapper8352 yeah I doubt the Baltic would join willy and I don't think Poland wouldn't really like being under Russian sphere again.
      Well since the Germans aren't really that extreme as was when the Soviet Union is around they wouldn't commit seppuku.
      But hey yours video.

  • @tanyasingh5485
    @tanyasingh5485 2 роки тому +3

    Wtf USSR was as south as Indian borders

  • @noam1879
    @noam1879 2 роки тому +4

    The good ending

  • @theenforcer3667
    @theenforcer3667 Рік тому +6

    this is so heartwarming that the russians helped poland against the nazis

  • @HEKVT
    @HEKVT 2 роки тому +9

    This is interesting, however - would the 1945 Nuclear bombs still happen?
    I assume the Japanese did the same as in real life, Pearl Harbour, and further expansion, so they're at war with the US.
    However, Germany was overwhelmed relatively quickly - would their top scientists still have the time to work and develop nuclear bombs, and would they be able to escape to the US, seeing as the US wasn't involved in the European Theatre (I assume so, since Britain did not have support of the US in keeping Germany united.) So would the Manhattan Project be started, and completed in time to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

  • @the3zoooz1
    @the3zoooz1 2 роки тому +3

    Disagree Russia would be a USA allies

  • @megarussel231
    @megarussel231 4 місяці тому +3

    На самом деле я не думаю, что всё пошло бы таким образом. Под конец существования РИ, она была полуфеодальной державой, да и курс монархии был довольно устаревшим, так что Россия при монархе или при парламенте должна была бы семимильными шагами (такими же темпами, как и в СССР) пройти 2 индустриальных революции, чтобы одержать победу над Рейхом

    • @therokenyk8062
      @therokenyk8062 3 місяці тому

      вот только вопрос о существовании Рейха при победе Белых до сих пор открыт.

  • @EmoPineapple
    @EmoPineapple Рік тому +5

    My only issue with this is that there were barely any monarchists in the White army, most were trying to uphold the republican regime and the legacy of the February Revolution. There were quite a lot of socialists as well.

  • @historysam8611
    @historysam8611 2 роки тому +6

    What happened to Alexander Kolchak since he never took power?

  • @josephikrakowski5707
    @josephikrakowski5707 Рік тому +2

    You ignored the oster conspiracy. Should the sudatenland not have been ceded, the nazis would have lost power.

  • @cr3zniat3r33
    @cr3zniat3r33 2 роки тому +19

    The good ending

    • @kinggodzilla309
      @kinggodzilla309 2 роки тому +3

      The good ending is there no civil war or revolution in the first place

    • @kinggodzilla309
      @kinggodzilla309 2 роки тому

      That ending is better than white win

    • @cr3zniat3r33
      @cr3zniat3r33 2 роки тому +2

      Makes sense

  • @thanasisrks4944
    @thanasisrks4944 Рік тому +43

    What a wonderful and much better world would that be! A united Eastern and western Europe just like this time line would be better!
    🇬🇷☦️🇷🇺

    • @idontknowlololol
      @idontknowlololol Рік тому +2

      No

    • @Holymackarel_babadoogaming123
      @Holymackarel_babadoogaming123 11 місяців тому

      ​@@idontknowlolololIn this question is, idk

    • @maximjachmar8629
      @maximjachmar8629 8 місяців тому

      ​​l​@@idontknowlololol
      Russian Empire: 97% Christian)))☦️ in 2021
      Atheist 1%, Buddhism 1% and others (Islam 0%)

    • @thegangstachimp
      @thegangstachimp 4 місяці тому

      ​@@idontknowlolololname one good thing communism did for the world

    • @idontknowlololol
      @idontknowlololol 4 місяці тому

      @@thegangstachimp
      Free healthcare
      No illeteracy
      No unemployment
      Free housing
      The right to work
      8 hour workday
      Equal gender rights
      Equal rights for all nationalities
      Defeat nazism
      Free education
      Free universities
      Free public transport
      Free water
      Free electricity

  • @serbian_patriot56
    @serbian_patriot56 Рік тому +3

    The best ending

    • @quantisticman8415
      @quantisticman8415 Рік тому +2

      Ah yes a world whit a ton of monarchist states

    • @brf493
      @brf493 Рік тому +1

      Челик, иди к первому классу готовься, а не комментики пиши

  • @Maltavian
    @Maltavian Рік тому +2

    The four worlds
    1. The western world/The 1st world:
    This Faction would be the most economically,militarily,industrialy,politicaly stronger than the 2 other worlds.
    2.The Monarchistic world/The russianic World/The 2nd world/The orthodox world:
    The 2nd most powerful Faction in this tripolar world possibly being stronger than the western world for a brief period of time in the 1950's
    3.The Traditionalistic world/The 3rd world/The chinese world/The dynastic world
    The 2nd weakest in the tripolar world being ouright demolished after ww2 in asia by fighting the japanese this world would be more unstable than the other 2 Factions
    4.The Poverty world/The 4th world/The non-aligned movement
    Possibly the most unstable faction being comprised primaly the weakest country the only strong power in this world is india but you could guess that india is the leader in this faction making this world The Quadralaticalar world.

  • @thatrandomguyontheinternet2477
    @thatrandomguyontheinternet2477 2 роки тому +9

    If the Checkoslovak legion choose to help the White Russians and march on Moscow they would probably have won

  • @Dejroslaw2448
    @Dejroslaw2448 5 місяців тому +2

    This is actually very realistic because yes there is no communism but yet still some countries lose also very much

  • @MistaHassan
    @MistaHassan 2 роки тому +8

    This would make a great alt history mod for hoi4 “What if the whites won the civil war?”

    • @punk1987
      @punk1987 2 роки тому

      Есть такой уже

    • @punk1987
      @punk1987 2 роки тому +1

      Перевод на английский кстати там есть

  • @АнгелПетров-я5ь
    @АнгелПетров-я5ь 21 день тому +2

    In 2021 period, you made a mistake If the ruller is a woman, it isn't tsar it's tsarica, someting like king and queen

  • @morsecode980
    @morsecode980 2 роки тому +116

    Interesting, plus I see you kinda implemented my Balkanized Germany idea so cudos for that 😂 I had a few other ideas I came up with recently:
    • What if Duke Konstantin Pavlovich of Russia traveled to Greece during their War of Independence and used it to restore the Byzantine Empire in the 1820’s with himself as “Emperor Constantine XII?”
    • What if France had another revolution in May 1968?
    • What if the “Golpe Borghese,” a planned neo-fascist coup in Italy, actually happened in 1970?
    • What if Mikhail Gorbachev’s reforms succeeded in saving the Soviet Union but transitioned it out of communism into democratic socialism?

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +12

      Nice ideas, I'll get them made

    • @googs8869
      @googs8869 2 роки тому +1

      @@patrioticbritishmapper8352 this is unrealistic and stupid my god reupload this

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +17

      @@googs8869 it is not stupid or unrealistic, it is simply an interpretation, in Alternate history we all have our opinions as we are simply speculating, if you have a different opinion on how things would've have played out than I do, that's fine, and I'd be happy to hear your opinions.

    • @springyguy
      @springyguy 2 роки тому +7

      @@googs8869 This is called Alternate History for a reason

    • @theappel
      @theappel 2 роки тому

      @@patrioticbritishmapper8352 I’m confused, did Russia invade the eastern and central Asian countries? Because them peacefully uniting wouldn’t happen.

  • @stephmod7434
    @stephmod7434 2 роки тому +2

    2:20 GREEKS AND FINNISH ARE NOT SLAVS

  • @GanjaMasterBlaster
    @GanjaMasterBlaster 2 роки тому +9

    Long Live The Tsar!
    Also thank you for this video, it was good :]
    But except for the part that Greece is under control

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +3

      Your welcome.

    • @GanjaMasterBlaster
      @GanjaMasterBlaster 2 роки тому +1

      @@patrioticbritishmapper8352 👍

    • @karimonarrezkm
      @karimonarrezkm 7 місяців тому

      GOD SAVE THE TSAR LONG LIVE TATIANA LONG LIVE NICHOLAS II LONG LIVE OLGA LONG LIVE MARIA LONG LIVE ANASTASIA LONG LIVE ALEXANDRA LONG LIVE ALEXEI LONG LIVE THE ROMANOVS LONG LIVE THE MONARCHY!

  • @latro6205
    @latro6205 2 роки тому +10

    This is what every American wants

  • @PulsatingOrgan
    @PulsatingOrgan 4 місяці тому +2

    Went completely off the rails when the video got to Germany. I have yet to see any alt history videos remotely get Germany right but i suppose thats the point of alt history

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  4 місяці тому +1

      Maybe everyone else just reached a different conclusion to you? But as you said it's alt history, we're dealing with hypotheticals, so who knows?

  • @beanmanbutchina
    @beanmanbutchina 2 роки тому +6

    No Step Back DLC is too TNO in my opinion but it’s still amazing and this reminds me of it when you can restore the Empire and do what Taboritsky wanted to do

  • @jeff_theepic1011
    @jeff_theepic1011 5 місяців тому +2

    This video shows just how peaceful the world can be without communism.

  • @joestephen3756
    @joestephen3756 2 роки тому +33

    Idk about Pan-Slavism - the idea never had a huge amount of support outside of the Balkans (beyond small intellectual circles in the Bohemian lands), and unlike shown here would never have been accepted by non-Slav Greece or Finland. Apart from this, Poland had never subscribed to Pan-Slavism, having been partitioned thrice by Russia and very roughly Russified in the 19th Century, with Russia brutally suppressing the 1831 and 1863 uprisings.
    Also, do you think they would have attempted to reassert control over Finland militarily?

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +12

      Greece is there mostly for religious reasons and them both hating Turkey, its not due to pan slavism, sorry should've made that clearer, Poland is essentially like post ww2 Poland in that its a Russian puppet just not communist, as for Finland, I don't know if they'd actually fight a war there, as the Soviets found out the Fins aren't ones to mess around with, however, the white movement did win in Finland so maybe they remain allies due to that along with the "army in being" doctrine acting as a threat to them.

    • @fkjl4717
      @fkjl4717 2 роки тому +2

      Actually Mannerheim was a loyal general of Russian imperial army. Why would they go to war? In opposite Finland would be a very first ally of White Russia.

    • @jakubkarczynski269
      @jakubkarczynski269 2 роки тому

      @@fkjl4717 Probably becouse he wanted to be independent. Fins colud capture Piotrograd. But decided that it wolud help whites. Who didn't acepted free finland.

    • @yurivii
      @yurivii Рік тому

      @@patrioticbritishmapper8352 One thing is certain in all timelines. Poles hate Russians and it goes way beyond the communism thing or even partitions. This rivalry got started in medieval times and its just keeps going. Poles hate Russians more than Germans and Germans wanted to exterminate them.

  • @daniel_bbw2000
    @daniel_bbw2000 Рік тому +1

    China by Kuomintang or Mao Zedong?

    • @gengarzilla1685
      @gengarzilla1685 11 місяців тому +1

      Kuomintang. Mao never gets close to power thanks to the global discrediting of communism after White Russia's victory.

  • @supremeleaderdracovish3415
    @supremeleaderdracovish3415 2 роки тому +6

    8:38 this map has some similarities to the What if the Whites won map that I created in Discord

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +2

      Indeed, you made a good map, I just made a couple of changes due to stuff that happens in the timeline.

  • @skymaster0yt
    @skymaster0yt 2 роки тому +2

    No? Poland would be against Russia

  • @Jishy2415
    @Jishy2415 2 роки тому +7

    I think you glorified Russia too much, and I highly doubt it would be any where close to as well off as you showed it

  • @rhy40official
    @rhy40official 4 місяці тому +2

    2:40 better then the present one honestly

  • @hanshenghuang402
    @hanshenghuang402 Рік тому +3

    The Tsarist Empire represents the real Russia, just like the two-stroke stands true for motorcycle racing.

  • @Norg1
    @Norg1 Рік тому +2

    What if the wagner group took over russia 😅

  • @someone-wh2rb
    @someone-wh2rb 2 роки тому +6

    one problem in this scenario is russia splitting konigsberg with poland makes no sense. in our timeline the reasoning behind taking east german lands was the deportation of germans west as revenge for the holocaust against slavs. however in this timeline with the nazis apparently dying in 3 years, and not being able to even take poland they wouldnt have been able to genocide as many people as they did in our timeline meaning there would be no revenge from russia

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +1

      Russia had wanted Konigsberg prior to that, in the seven years war they wanted to take it, quite likely they'd try do it again

  • @RussianNationalist
    @RussianNationalist 8 місяців тому +2

    Слава России 🇷🇺🇷🇸🏴‍☠️Z

  • @joshstainton8207
    @joshstainton8207 2 роки тому +5

    Honestly I'm surprised that Russia and Greece didn't partition Turkey as both countries would want land from it

    • @gengarzilla1685
      @gengarzilla1685 2 роки тому +2

      These two would inevitably both claim Istanbul, Greece because Constantinople and Russia because it's the gateway to the Mediterranean. No way could this be done to the satisfaction of both sides.

    • @joshstainton8207
      @joshstainton8207 2 роки тому +1

      @@gengarzilla1685 assuming they're allies after the partition, Russia wouldn't have to lay claim to Instanbul. 1. Because it's back in Orthodox hands and 2. Because a Greek client state would allow for them to access the Mediterranean

  • @karbythekirby_yt
    @karbythekirby_yt 4 місяці тому +1

    Russia and usa would still be allies.

  • @theunshameless8555
    @theunshameless8555 2 роки тому +13

    Ah yes, the good ending to the civil war

    • @Poum1935Alavictoria
      @Poum1935Alavictoria 2 роки тому +4

      This is a bad ending wtf are you saying

    • @anothernpc4943
      @anothernpc4943 2 роки тому +6

      @@Poum1935Alavictoria This is what should have been

    • @Poum1935Alavictoria
      @Poum1935Alavictoria 2 роки тому

      @@anothernpc4943 no

    • @kirilll7806
      @kirilll7806 2 роки тому

      @@Poum1935Alavictoria nobody asked about your tankie opinion.

    • @TheBabybeauty
      @TheBabybeauty 2 роки тому +1

      @@Poum1935Alavictoria meanwhile " wTh ArE yOu SaYiNg ItS fUcKiNg BaD eNdIng " Shut it

  • @ColdmanOrleans
    @ColdmanOrleans 3 місяці тому +2

    russia: white vs red
    usa: white vs black

  • @schnitzel4584
    @schnitzel4584 2 роки тому +37

    Sometimes I feel like there are so many good endings of the history after ww1 but we have the worst ending

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +21

      Maybe not quite the worst, that's a world ruled by fascists or communists, still there were many chances for a much better world

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +19

      ​@@patrioticbritishmapper8352 Though the Soviet Union is bad, but Russian Empire isn't better...
      And you're right, we still have chances for a much better world.

    • @schnitzel4584
      @schnitzel4584 2 роки тому +8

      @@mappingowo3966 You mean the monarchist, yes tgey were also not good but whites where republicans and monarchists

    • @mappingowo3966
      @mappingowo3966 2 роки тому +3

      ​@@schnitzel4584 Oh, yep.
      You're right, but this video lets Russian Empire still exist, which means Monarchists still controlled this country, isn't it?
      And Russian Empire is economically poor, even Russian government have a great ruling skill, it's impossible for a weak and needs to recover's country to put that much country into its puppet. (Especially Poland, Polan was strong when it got independence)
      And other European countries isn't always nice, they helped Russian Empire once, the Russian need to pay back or even more.
      If Russian Empire still controls the Baltic, Belarus, and Ukraine, they must often face rebellions, a country in a confusion is difficult to get stronger...

    • @Mehmet_Ergin
      @Mehmet_Ergin 2 роки тому +2

      @@mappingowo3966 I think if the whites had won, Russia would have borrowed and tried to get better, but people still inspired by lennin would have rebelled.
      (I am afraid here, I am afraid that he will be worse than the tsar's len and commit even greater rebel massacres)
      Russia would be worse because of these debts and would be a puppet of England and America. In World War II, it would probably invade. Even if the generals were good, because for those who did not enter industrialization, the weapon problem would be more than the Soviets.

  • @Doctor_Silver-tv4xg
    @Doctor_Silver-tv4xg 5 місяців тому +2

    As a russian I prefer this world over the real one

  • @aboltarikh2605
    @aboltarikh2605 2 роки тому +3

    Afghanistan won’t be annexed

  • @Darwidx
    @Darwidx 4 місяці тому +1

    Poland joining for "full independence" ? Are you aware Polish plan for full independence included reformation of Comonwealth ? Belarus, Lithuania and half of Ukraine for just help ?

  • @iam_chair9026
    @iam_chair9026 Рік тому +3

    Best ending

  • @makedonslearningchannel
    @makedonslearningchannel 6 днів тому +1

    This is literally 1984 but way better.

  • @MCLegend13
    @MCLegend13 2 роки тому +9

    I doubt in timeline the empires would fall because no 6 year long world war 2 would make them likely to hold onto their colonies not till the same time as our timeline but likely seeing them still to this day and if Russia was seen as a big enough threat France and Britain might unify into the Franco British Union making the collapse of their empires impossible.
    Very good video I hope one day you will do one on the Franco British Union

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +5

      The Empires probably don't fall completely, they probably keeps parts of their empires and decolonise the rest at a much slower pace, also the Franco British Union is definitely a timeline I plan on making

    • @averagerobloxiansocialist4070
      @averagerobloxiansocialist4070 2 роки тому +1

      I thought World War 2 lasted 6 years not 7.

    • @MCLegend13
      @MCLegend13 2 роки тому +1

      @@averagerobloxiansocialist4070 yeah true it was a mistype ma bad I know it was 39 - 45

    • @MCLegend13
      @MCLegend13 2 роки тому +1

      @@patrioticbritishmapper8352 can’t wait to see your next video

    • @patrioticbritishmapper8352
      @patrioticbritishmapper8352  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks

  • @Chernosotenets
    @Chernosotenets 2 роки тому +2

    This is the best option, hello from Russia

  • @AT-yn9dm
    @AT-yn9dm 2 роки тому +9

    I would do anything to live in this timeline.

  • @Christian_Sannino
    @Christian_Sannino 4 місяці тому +1

    No communism, better world

  • @patrickweber3954
    @patrickweber3954 2 роки тому +3

    You can play as the White Russians in European War 6 1914's 1917 Conquest campaign.

    • @gnas1897
      @gnas1897 Рік тому

      Oh wow I wasn't expecting that game to be mentioned here

  • @kristijanveljaca1687
    @kristijanveljaca1687 Рік тому +2

    The good ending

  • @ozymandias3329
    @ozymandias3329 2 роки тому +3

    Blessed ending

  • @ovca410
    @ovca410 Рік тому +2

    It's more like - what if czechoslovak legions helped the whites and saved them, as they helped them

  • @Squidwart20
    @Squidwart20 2 роки тому +3

    The fact that he didn’t color the whites white or light gray is just annoying

  • @Chernosotenets
    @Chernosotenets 2 роки тому +2

    march, farewell Slav

  • @adincehic5224
    @adincehic5224 2 роки тому +4

    Make a video about what od the Byzantine Empire survived.

  • @coconutperson1985
    @coconutperson1985 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for making China powerful

  • @SUPABROS
    @SUPABROS Рік тому +2

    I'm actually thinking the world in 2022 might be less developed, since there wasn't a Soviet threat everyone was worrying about, i mean there was still the Russians but it likely wasnt at the same level of the cold war.