my mom has actively told me if she ever is in a state where she can no longer speak for herself or take care of herself that she wants me to let her go. forcing someone to remain alive if they are unable to actually live isn’t fair or right.
one of my friends told her mom her wishes, but did not write anything down. Her shunt malfunctioned after 20 years and her heart stopped in the middle of the CT scan, mom freaked out, said "save my daughter!". They did, but it took *minutes* ! She ended up with more damage that she had when she went in. When my friend woke up, she asked what happened. They told her, and when she confronted the mom, the mom said, " I saved your life, you're welcome!" She went ballistic! She refused to go home with the mom, or as she refers to her now: The demon that made me worse. When one of her abled friends heard what happened, they were so appalled they *insisted* on moving in to help her so she wouldn't have to deal with her mom anymore.
@@justianowskiYour friend is very cruel with her mum. But that’s normal with patients like this. If you have a condition that will progress deteriorating you physically and cognitively the best is to with your Doctor make an advanced Care Plan. Copies to everyone, one with you at all time and pry its followed. 🕊🙏🏻
@@melluques8475 To be fair, if I were dying a painful death and someone forced me to keep living against my wishes, I wouldn't be very happy with them either. It's not about the feelings of the people who will miss you, it's about making you comfortable and sending you off with dignity when there's nothing else to be done. If it's my time, it's my time. Don't force my heart to keep beating and my body to stay in pain just because you're not ready to stay goodbye. Someone's emotional pain at my passing will fade-- organ failure and living as a vegetable will not.
@@mackenzieorzechowski5462 The possibility that they'll pull through and come out of the vegetative state. Obviously something that depends on each case but things like that do happen.
@@falcon8105 i very much agree, it is too rare to be a factor, someone in this condition who do not show any sign of improvement shouldn't have to keep suffering just cause the doctors want to "keep them alive", i get that rules and such indicate that everyone is to be treated very preciously, i get it, but in a case like this, it's a lost fight that they are just dragging on when there's no point in doing so, and that is basically just tormenting them for the sake of it, which is just rather evil in my opinion
@@victoriarose4506 I didn't like him either. I thought he was very creepy when it came to Natalie. It felt like he was waiting for her to get over her dead husband so he could be with her. So gross.
He learned his lesson. When he found out that she was on a placebo in the trial he put her in, he literally said, "I should have left her alone." He stopped meddling after that. The worst thing about doctors is that sometimes they forget that just because you can make a person live longer, doesn't always mean you should.
I told my best friend if anything happens to me she has a month for me to wake up before she pulls the plug. My grandpa had the same rule, but with his ventilator. He didn’t want live on that thing and neither do I.
Her other children were so shocked to hear that she'd tried to kill their brother, but they ended up assisting her to do it. Have to admit I'm curious how that conversation went down.
I think the conversation would be they were shocked she didn’t tell them. That they wouldn’t get a chance to say goodbye. But they agreed it was the kindest thing to do. 5:24
@@jessyca1804 maybe a nurse secretly helped them or unless they just pulled the ventilator tube out idk, and I guess maybe they just said their good byes and did it
@@rarehearts2602 ya and it’s like he was suffering, it must be a night mare to just lay their stuck in your body for 5 years, but like will the family members get arrested?
Always love on Tv shows like this how the drs and nurses will push, bend or outright break the rules all the time for their own patients and then get on their high horses when someone else does it.
Exactly, in another episode, the doctor who in this video called the police, snatched a tank of nitrogen oxide from the other doctor in the video precisely for that, treating a patient that he misdiagnosed and forcing the baby she was treating to receive a more invasive treatment.
Dr. Halstead ignored a cancer patient's DNR and ended up getting the hospital sued by her. And here he is lecturing Dr. Manning about following the law.
@@deansam1 Yes, and in that episode Dr. Manning was the one that wanted to follow the DNR. But in another episode she had a lot of trouble accepting that a kid with terminal cancer didn't want to continue with his treatment (they didn't mention it, but it was basically also a DNR), and she called CPS on the dad.
This is bs. My mom was in this exact state and we absolutely were allowed to make the decision to end all life sustaining measures, even though she didn't have any documents stating her wishes. Plus, the mom, as his medical proxy, could absolutely have signed a DNR on his behalf.
In this specific method it is technically illegal. You need a medical expert verify that there is zero chance for improvement of life (which is 100% certain for a persistent vegetative state), and signed off by a judge. The real case of Terry Schiavo, which this is probably loosely based on had its own issues mainly due to disputes between who had the right to make that choice, her husband or her parents and no living will to be sure of what she would have wanted. And the parents manipulating the public with videos that made it look like she was smiling at a loved ones face (when really people who were around her said she had those reactions even if nobody was within eysight).
My Grandmother had a pacemaker put in her a couple months ago and said it was one of the worse experiences she had to go through. She's feeling back to her normal self now but what she went through finally opened her up to the reality that she's aging. She is pretty healthy for a woman in her late 70's. She had a family meeting with most of us to talk about what happens after she passes and one of the things she said that she didn't want to be on any type of life support if that were to happen to her.
Legally the mother is in the wrong, morally it kind of depends and is a bit complicated. Her intentions were good, what she did was out of love as far as we are able to tell. Assuming that is the case and ignoring the legal aspect I wouldn't necessarily say it was the right thing to do, it depends on things we can't really know for sure. Like what her son actually wanted, how much he was actually suffering, or if he was even capable of wanting anything or conscious enough to suffer. Even if he reflexively reacted to pain and seemed to be in pain that doesn't necessarily mean he actually "felt" it. From what I understand people in vegetative states can experience pain, like their nerves can work and send signals, but FEELING that pain and suffering from it seems to require more than. Idk if we know 100% for sure (because honestly what can you know for sure) but it doesn't seem like they are able to actually experience those things in the same way a normal fully conscious person does, I guess it's case by case and depends on what we can see with brain activity. All of that being considered my overly thought-out personal opinion on the scenario in this TV show is that his mother seemed to care for him deeply and didn't want him to suffer, from her perspective it seemed like he was suffering, she didn't believe he would want that, and she wanted to help him. What she did was illegal but given the circumstances it was understandable. Though if he could experience that suffering how she went about it was not great as it would cause more suffering. It was mentioned that she was considering moving to a place where assisted suicide was legal but with him unable to make his wishes clear that might not have worked out. It's a complicated situation and legal barriers make acting on it in that way even more difficult. There are good reasons for that but it can potentially result in a situation where someone is suffering when they would not want to be. There are all kinds of other questions and opinions involved too, like if he wasn't conscious in any way we can measure then some may already consider him dead. Others would say you should preserve someone's life no matter what. What is it really like for people like that, do they live in their head isolated from the outside world unable to communicate? Is there still something there? Do we have souls separate from our physical body and regardless of outward appearance? What's the value of keeping someone in that state depending on the answers to questions of that nature? That probably depends on what happens to what's left if your body dies, which of course there are many different opinions on that. Basically it's a messy situation and it depends on who you ask. You didn't technically ask and I apologize for this wall of text lmao. It is interesting, though, and I figured why not think about it out loud some.
Families in this situation need counsel on how to seek legal recourse on such actions as removing feeding tubes, refusing antibiotics, etc. They need help, not isolation and punishment. My 96 year old grandmother in the late stages of Alzheimers, and with a belly full of cancer, died of pneumonia.
If this were an animal pet, it would be cruel and illegal to keep it suffering. It'w crazy that us humans have less of a right to not suffer than animals...
We are more humane to our animals than we are to Grandpa. We put such value on human life even when it's painful and lacks quality. We give peace to our pets but not to the people we love.
I am grateful that in the UK we are finally looking at a law to allow for assisted dying. I have said repeatedly to people that if I was put into a vegetative state, without an iota of hope of recovering, let die. And I have said that if I develop Alzheimer’s (high chance considering on both sides of my family I have lost family members to it), I will rather die than be turned into a shell.
I think removing someone’s feeding tube is inhumane. They say starving is one of the most painful and slow ways to die. My mom worked in a state hospital and the parents of a lady had the feeding tube removed. My mom had to go in there day after day to still do all the other stuff for her. She told me even though that girl was starving to death, she still smiled when she saw my mom and wanted hugs. She did pass a way after a few days but she fought hard to survive as long as she could because she didn’t want to die. It’s a horrible and inhumane way to end someone’s life.
My grandma wanted to die and simply refused all food and fluids. We saw her slowly starving and dehydrating for 2-3 weeks before she finally passed on. She was what they call nil by mouth and any pain was carefully managed so I don't think you are correct in your statement. If anything, it's the discomfort of bedsores you need to watch out for.
@@MusiCatsKing you can even read up on it. Starvation is painful. Your grandma was on pain meds to ease things like you said, but if you do some research, it’s a horrible way to go. There’s a study that was done on starvation where they had men volunteer, the results for that study were horrific. You said it took 2-3 weeks, that’s not a quick death, that is a prolonged death. Plus there’s a difference between someone wanting to die, and someone’s family choosing it for them.
@@Seek1878 even if it’s after some time, that doesn’t mean it’s painless the whole time. I’m going by what my mom saw, and what I’ve read about and the documentary I saw. Starvation is not a peaceful way to go.
@@cloudedcolour5329those chest compressions were done the right way for sure, some other character on this show either don’t push hard enough or push to fast
This was a crime. Just like Terry Schiavo, the husband had to go to court to get a court order. This is why every adult over 18 should be mandated to complete an advance medical directive to health care officials and designate someone with medical power of attorney and power of attorney for financial decisions. Just like 18 year old men have to register for Selective Service all adults competent to make decisions should make their end of life decisions known.
Those are quite possibly some of the worst chest compressions I've ever seen! I hope Dr. Mike never sees this! (I wouldn't expect them to do chest compressions on an actor! They don't do close up patient face shots, presumably so they can use a dummy!)
@Justice237 is right tho, real, accurate, deep chest compressions could break and actor's ribs and I have no idea what would happen if you did it on a living patient but I'd imagine it'd cause tremendous pain, possibly messing up their natural heart rhythm. Yes, they could've done it better but I try to give actors grace if its on a real person (if it's a dummy or a fake person then they should be accurate)
halstead and his saviour complex is unbearable... continuously forcing people to live when they don't want to due to pain and incurable illnesses is cruel
Let's keep him in a vegetable state for probably forever. Cam he feel? probably. Can he hear? Probably. He knows he's in pain mom knows he's in pain it will never end.
This is such a tricky situation. Like on one hand, life is sacred and special and worth protecting. On the other hand though, he had a pulse but he wasn't living and had 0 quality of life
I get the doctor and the mom. Mom couldn't live with her son suffering and unable to live, while the doctor is focused on keeping a body alive. While her actions are criminal, I don't think a jury would convict her. 90% of people would understand that no one should be left to lay on a bed for the rest of their existence. There is no quality of life there.
Yo pasé por un ataque al corazón y me hicieron un cateterismo mi diagnóstico fue una de mis arterias colapso debido a una falla genética en ella mientras estaba pasando por todo eso solo pensaba en seguir luchando sin importar nada solo quería seguir viva así que por favor nadie piense que alguien quiere dejar de existir una vez que estás ahí en ese momento luchas por ti vida con todas tus fuerzas o por lo menos ese es mi caso pero no creo ser la única que piense así ,lo que creo es que los familiares se cansan del enfermo y ya pasaron su duelo y ellos están listos para ser libres de cuidar a alguien que ocupa ayuda 24/7 pero para esos casos existen lugares que atienden pacientes por favor lucha por la vida y no decidas por otros
It's more properly called post-coma unresponsiveness (PCU), but essentially it's because the patient is alive but has minimal voluntary activity, like a vegetable. It was coined in 1972 but it's not considered the most sensitive description of a human being nowadays.
What? She wanted to kill him by giving him pneumonia? He can blink and communicate with her..was it his idea really?! However I understand euthanasia is (there) and maybe she truly lived in the wrong state or place?!
She wasn't intending to give him pneumonia, she was trying to let him go peacefully by blocking his tracheal tube and letting him pass on. Unfortunately he ended up getting pneumonia and she got scared seeing him in so much pain
honestly the guy dr is right, he understand why she did it but its still wrong and could cost the woman dr to lose her license for not reporting as a mandated reporter and thats also not the way to do it
yes, yes they can. I've heard of this being tried as manslaughter before, but this mother just dragged her two other kids into this as accomplices. Once you go to prison for something like that, it sticks with you forever. It can affect your ability to find a job, get housing, and bar you from staying in certain communities (i.e. certain neighborhoods, country clubs, clubs that aren't nightclubs in general, I know a guy who got kicked out of his stable because he'd been arrested for drug possession and distribution, guy wound up having to sell his horse because no other stable would let him board). Her kids' futures are ruined because the mom didn't think to get legal counsel for this.
oh, the guy who illegally violated a woman's DNR/DNI order so she could continue being a guinea pig against her wishes suddenly cares about the legality of how to provide patient comfort? that's rich lmao he and natalie have always deserved each other
Natalie is at fault here. She didn't call the police and continued to let the mom be with her son without any supervision knowing the mom did try to kill her son. I hope the episode shows the mom getting arrested and Natalie in trouble.
You know, I really ought to look into getting myself a DNR - Do Not Resuscitate. I'd rather die than to live like a vegetable - and better yet, maybe I can become an organ donor too.
If mom is the caregiver and has power of attorney doesn’t she have the right to ask to end his care so he would pass away? Is it a state issue? I’ve heard of parents of minors choose to does this after years of caring for the child because it can take that long to be ready to let go.
Well, I'll be starting my living will today. If God wants me alive, I'll be alive without machines and tubes. If God wants me dead, I'll die. I will not be a Chia Pet to make other people feel better.
@@dietotaku I could believe someone with their sense of self but no ability to communicate it might want to keep living in the right conditions. This is where it gets complicated, because it can be extremely difficult to impossible to know how much of someone is “still in there” and how they feel about their condition. I wouldn’t feel comfortable declaring that life isn’t worth living in that state by default.
hospitals get money for every person they intubate & who end up ward of the hospital. being a ward of the hospital basically means that your an atm and once they can no longer get money out of you they pull the plug
I don’t know if this is real or not but correct me if I’m wrong and one episode of house a patient was in vegetative state and house injected them with some sort of serum and the patient woke up for maximum of two days or less.
So dude was going way too fast on his chest compressions. Like I know that’s a stupid thing to harp on but it bothered me. Like I understand not going the full depth but at least get your pace right
That's the correct spelling for a newborn. I'm fairly confident doing that to an adult would be worse than doing nothing at all. The heart is too big to be helpful like that.
When I tell you it makes me sick TO. MY. CORE. when caregivers or guardians of poor people who can't speak for themselves or move on their own always assume that they want to give up. I can only imagine the horror those people are thinking when their life is about to end against their will.
I have a advance directive in place that states my wishes. I’m very clear if I have to live on life supportive measures with no chance of recovery then they are to let me go.
That lady doctor is a real you know what. These people think they are? God? No I’m a registered nurse Holly like mine the doctor that God does not think he’s a doctor😉
@@missytanner3501 a caregiver burning out, probably just means that the caregiver should be switched out with another trusted person to take care of the patient not to take the life of the patient into their own hands and kill them
Idk about the adult siblings, but mom was clearly having some kind of disassociative episode. She might have a case of 'not guilty by mental disease or defect.' At least, that's how the actress made it seem.
Sorry but what she did was terrible, she murdered her son and let him suffer more before he died slowly. If she wanted to assist suicide, the OD him of morphine. OD him on pain medication he would have been on even in a vegative state. what she essentially did was choke him to death by clogging his breathing tube, or possibly gave him an infection. What she did was NOT easing him or caring and NO assisted suicide would be reasoned like this
Given he’s got a trach he’s likely got more vulnerability since it’s an open way for infection to get in and you have a higher risk of antibiotic resistant infections
I am going to have to stop watching youtube because of these Kamala Harris videos. She is the only one that has laughed at the democratic process as she has been blessed Democratic nominee for president with any running mate of HER choice. Please spare me!
my mom has actively told me if she ever is in a state where she can no longer speak for herself or take care of herself that she wants me to let her go. forcing someone to remain alive if they are unable to actually live isn’t fair or right.
one of my friends told her mom her wishes, but did not write anything down. Her shunt malfunctioned after 20 years and her heart stopped in the middle of the CT scan, mom freaked out, said "save my daughter!". They did, but it took *minutes* ! She ended up with more damage that she had when she went in. When my friend woke up, she asked what happened. They told her, and when she confronted the mom, the mom said, " I saved your life, you're welcome!" She went ballistic! She refused to go home with the mom, or as she refers to her now: The demon that made me worse. When one of her abled friends heard what happened, they were so appalled they *insisted* on moving in to help her so she wouldn't have to deal with her mom anymore.
You need it in writing AND notarized at an attorney's office. DNR under very specific conditions that your attorney will.ask you to outline.
That's why we have DNR orders.
@@justianowskiYour friend is very cruel with her mum. But that’s normal with patients like this. If you have a condition that will progress deteriorating you physically and cognitively the best is to with your Doctor make an advanced Care Plan. Copies to everyone, one with you at all time and pry its followed. 🕊🙏🏻
@@melluques8475 To be fair, if I were dying a painful death and someone forced me to keep living against my wishes, I wouldn't be very happy with them either. It's not about the feelings of the people who will miss you, it's about making you comfortable and sending you off with dignity when there's nothing else to be done. If it's my time, it's my time. Don't force my heart to keep beating and my body to stay in pain just because you're not ready to stay goodbye. Someone's emotional pain at my passing will fade-- organ failure and living as a vegetable will not.
Forcing someone in a vegetative state to "keep living" is inhumane.
I agree. Who wants to live like that. What’s the point of keeping someone alive to live the rest of their life like that.
@@mackenzieorzechowski5462 The possibility that they'll pull through and come out of the vegetative state. Obviously something that depends on each case but things like that do happen.
@@karateman302 that's such a rare case that said patient will come out of a vegetative state if they're not brain dead or have an autoimmune disease
@@falcon8105 i very much agree, it is too rare to be a factor, someone in this condition who do not show any sign of improvement shouldn't have to keep suffering just cause the doctors want to "keep them alive", i get that rules and such indicate that everyone is to be treated very preciously, i get it, but in a case like this, it's a lost fight that they are just dragging on when there's no point in doing so, and that is basically just tormenting them for the sake of it, which is just rather evil in my opinion
To quote George Carlin "Vegetable I don't care if I look like an artichoke you keep my a$$ alive.".
The irony of a doctor who deliberately ignored a cancer patient's DNR and got the hospital sued now lecturing another doctor about following the law.
He's the main reason I stopped watching Chicago Med. He grated on my nerves and ruined the show for me.
@@victoriarose4506 I didn't like him either. I thought he was very creepy when it came to Natalie. It felt like he was waiting for her to get over her dead husband so he could be with her. So gross.
He learned his lesson. When he found out that she was on a placebo in the trial he put her in, he literally said, "I should have left her alone." He stopped meddling after that. The worst thing about doctors is that sometimes they forget that just because you can make a person live longer, doesn't always mean you should.
it's almost like he learned and grew or something. who ever heard of that "character development" nonsense?
I get it. I wouldn’t want to live like that and I certainly wouldn’t want my family to have to care for me for decades. Lights out, let me go!
It’s one of the hardest things to let someone go.
You should probably look into getting a DNR order in place then.
I told my best friend if anything happens to me she has a month for me to wake up before she pulls the plug.
My grandpa had the same rule, but with his ventilator. He didn’t want live on that thing and neither do I.
Her other children were so shocked to hear that she'd tried to kill their brother, but they ended up assisting her to do it. Have to admit I'm curious how that conversation went down.
Same like bro I have no words and when he tried to resuscitate no one wanted to help him at first
I think the conversation would be they were shocked she didn’t tell them. That they wouldn’t get a chance to say goodbye. But they agreed it was the kindest thing to do. 5:24
@@jessyca1804 maybe a nurse secretly helped them or unless they just pulled the ventilator tube out idk, and I guess maybe they just said their good byes and did it
They wanted to end his suffering, yeah it wasn’t the best way and inhumane, but Sam was gone long ago, his body was there but Sam wasn’t there anymore
@@rarehearts2602 ya and it’s like he was suffering, it must be a night mare to just lay their stuck in your body for 5 years, but like will the family members get arrested?
Always love on Tv shows like this how the drs and nurses will push, bend or outright break the rules all the time for their own patients and then get on their high horses when someone else does it.
Exactly, in another episode, the doctor who in this video called the police, snatched a tank of nitrogen oxide from the other doctor in the video precisely for that, treating a patient that he misdiagnosed and forcing the baby she was treating to receive a more invasive treatment.
Dr. Halstead ignored a cancer patient's DNR and ended up getting the hospital sued by her. And here he is lecturing Dr. Manning about following the law.
@@deansam1 Yes, and in that episode Dr. Manning was the one that wanted to follow the DNR. But in another episode she had a lot of trouble accepting that a kid with terminal cancer didn't want to continue with his treatment (they didn't mention it, but it was basically also a DNR), and she called CPS on the dad.
@@deansam1 he learned his lesson
This is bs. My mom was in this exact state and we absolutely were allowed to make the decision to end all life sustaining measures, even though she didn't have any documents stating her wishes. Plus, the mom, as his medical proxy, could absolutely have signed a DNR on his behalf.
It's a TV show
Women can't spin in a circle and turn into wonderWoman nor can a man jump in a telephone booth and turn in to superman
I guess it’s different for each state but tbh if I was the doctor I just would have let her let him go
In this specific method it is technically illegal.
You need a medical expert verify that there is zero chance for improvement of life (which is 100% certain for a persistent vegetative state), and signed off by a judge.
The real case of Terry Schiavo, which this is probably loosely based on had its own issues mainly due to disputes between who had the right to make that choice, her husband or her parents and no living will to be sure of what she would have wanted.
And the parents manipulating the public with videos that made it look like she was smiling at a loved ones face (when really people who were around her said she had those reactions even if nobody was within eysight).
Laws vary so ..
My Grandmother had a pacemaker put in her a couple months ago and said it was one of the worse experiences she had to go through. She's feeling back to her normal self now but what she went through finally opened her up to the reality that she's aging. She is pretty healthy for a woman in her late 70's. She had a family meeting with most of us to talk about what happens after she passes and one of the things she said that she didn't want to be on any type of life support if that were to happen to her.
“She intentionally stopped his care to kill him”
“To end his suffering”
I can’t tell who’s in the wrong with this.
They both are!
They both are!
By law the mother and manning is wrong. Morally its a bit of an grey area.
Legally the mother is in the wrong, morally it kind of depends and is a bit complicated. Her intentions were good, what she did was out of love as far as we are able to tell. Assuming that is the case and ignoring the legal aspect I wouldn't necessarily say it was the right thing to do, it depends on things we can't really know for sure. Like what her son actually wanted, how much he was actually suffering, or if he was even capable of wanting anything or conscious enough to suffer. Even if he reflexively reacted to pain and seemed to be in pain that doesn't necessarily mean he actually "felt" it. From what I understand people in vegetative states can experience pain, like their nerves can work and send signals, but FEELING that pain and suffering from it seems to require more than. Idk if we know 100% for sure (because honestly what can you know for sure) but it doesn't seem like they are able to actually experience those things in the same way a normal fully conscious person does, I guess it's case by case and depends on what we can see with brain activity.
All of that being considered my overly thought-out personal opinion on the scenario in this TV show is that his mother seemed to care for him deeply and didn't want him to suffer, from her perspective it seemed like he was suffering, she didn't believe he would want that, and she wanted to help him. What she did was illegal but given the circumstances it was understandable. Though if he could experience that suffering how she went about it was not great as it would cause more suffering. It was mentioned that she was considering moving to a place where assisted suicide was legal but with him unable to make his wishes clear that might not have worked out. It's a complicated situation and legal barriers make acting on it in that way even more difficult. There are good reasons for that but it can potentially result in a situation where someone is suffering when they would not want to be.
There are all kinds of other questions and opinions involved too, like if he wasn't conscious in any way we can measure then some may already consider him dead. Others would say you should preserve someone's life no matter what. What is it really like for people like that, do they live in their head isolated from the outside world unable to communicate? Is there still something there? Do we have souls separate from our physical body and regardless of outward appearance? What's the value of keeping someone in that state depending on the answers to questions of that nature? That probably depends on what happens to what's left if your body dies, which of course there are many different opinions on that. Basically it's a messy situation and it depends on who you ask. You didn't technically ask and I apologize for this wall of text lmao. It is interesting, though, and I figured why not think about it out loud some.
Yet if it were a pet dog or cat, it wouldn't even be up for debate.
Forcing someone to stay alive when they can't LIVE is inhumane and cruel.
Unless your wishes are documented, everyone will default to what the law says is "right or wrong.""
Families in this situation need counsel on how to seek legal recourse on such actions as removing feeding tubes, refusing antibiotics, etc. They need help, not isolation and punishment. My 96 year old grandmother in the late stages of Alzheimers, and with a belly full of cancer, died of pneumonia.
If this were an animal pet, it would be cruel and illegal to keep it suffering. It'w crazy that us humans have less of a right to not suffer than animals...
We are more humane to our animals than we are to Grandpa. We put such value on human life even when it's painful and lacks quality. We give peace to our pets but not to the people we love.
She could have taken it to court. Make your wishes known
IN WRITING!
Because hospitals make money off keeping them alive it's all about profits
I am grateful that in the UK we are finally looking at a law to allow for assisted dying. I have said repeatedly to people that if I was put into a vegetative state, without an iota of hope of recovering, let die. And I have said that if I develop Alzheimer’s (high chance considering on both sides of my family I have lost family members to it), I will rather die than be turned into a shell.
I think removing someone’s feeding tube is inhumane. They say starving is one of the most painful and slow ways to die. My mom worked in a state hospital and the parents of a lady had the feeding tube removed. My mom had to go in there day after day to still do all the other stuff for her. She told me even though that girl was starving to death, she still smiled when she saw my mom and wanted hugs. She did pass a way after a few days but she fought hard to survive as long as she could because she didn’t want to die. It’s a horrible and inhumane way to end someone’s life.
My grandma wanted to die and simply refused all food and fluids. We saw her slowly starving and dehydrating for 2-3 weeks before she finally passed on. She was what they call nil by mouth and any pain was carefully managed so I don't think you are correct in your statement. If anything, it's the discomfort of bedsores you need to watch out for.
@@MusiCatsKing you can even read up on it. Starvation is painful. Your grandma was on pain meds to ease things like you said, but if you do some research, it’s a horrible way to go. There’s a study that was done on starvation where they had men volunteer, the results for that study were horrific. You said it took 2-3 weeks, that’s not a quick death, that is a prolonged death. Plus there’s a difference between someone wanting to die, and someone’s family choosing it for them.
If they remove your feeding tube you go on hospice. They make sure you go peacefully and comfortably
Who is "they"? According to some medical experts, starvation becomes painless after some time.
@@Seek1878 even if it’s after some time, that doesn’t mean it’s painless the whole time. I’m going by what my mom saw, and what I’ve read about and the documentary I saw. Starvation is not a peaceful way to go.
5:55 those chest compressions would have doctor mike FURIOUS lmao
Not really since it is compressing an inch and at around 120BPM if you keep up the rhythm
@@cloudedcolour5329those chest compressions were done the right way for sure, some other character on this show either don’t push hard enough or push to fast
@@cloudedcolour5329 He was going way faster than 120, more like 180. Chest compressions are supposed to be done at 100 bpm.
This was a crime. Just like Terry Schiavo, the husband had to go to court to get a court order. This is why every adult over 18 should be mandated to complete an advance medical directive to health care officials and designate someone with medical power of attorney and power of attorney for financial decisions. Just like 18 year old men have to register for Selective Service all adults competent to make decisions should make their end of life decisions known.
agreed
And what average 18+ year old can afford an attorney???
She wants to end his suffering but chose a terrible way to do so. Those compressions are terrible!
Those are quite possibly some of the worst chest compressions I've ever seen! I hope Dr. Mike never sees this! (I wouldn't expect them to do chest compressions on an actor! They don't do close up patient face shots, presumably so they can use a dummy!)
People on set saw that and thought it was okay? Ridiculous.
@@leah6820-y9vWell real chest compressions would probably break an actor’s ribs, which isn’t great for doing multiple takes or, yunno, in general
BAHAHAHA
@Justice237 is right tho, real, accurate, deep chest compressions could break and actor's ribs and I have no idea what would happen if you did it on a living patient but I'd imagine it'd cause tremendous pain, possibly messing up their natural heart rhythm. Yes, they could've done it better but I try to give actors grace if its on a real person (if it's a dummy or a fake person then they should be accurate)
well now that you mention it i want him to react to this
This mother really just convinced her other kids to risk going to jail in order to help her kill her son.
He was tired of being in pain all the time. In that state, euthanasia is illegal. He went on his own terms, like my girl Amanda ❤
The guy was suffering.
halstead and his saviour complex is unbearable... continuously forcing people to live when they don't want to due to pain and incurable illnesses is cruel
Let's keep him in a vegetable state for probably forever. Cam he feel? probably. Can he hear? Probably. He knows he's in pain mom knows he's in pain it will never end.
Manning is so self righteous...
I know right she locked herself in a room an forced a child to take antibotics
This is such a tricky situation. Like on one hand, life is sacred and special and worth protecting. On the other hand though, he had a pulse but he wasn't living and had 0 quality of life
I get the doctor and the mom. Mom couldn't live with her son suffering and unable to live, while the doctor is focused on keeping a body alive. While her actions are criminal, I don't think a jury would convict her. 90% of people would understand that no one should be left to lay on a bed for the rest of their existence. There is no quality of life there.
this is an insane policy. It is cruel to all involved and it needs to change. Life at any price is not life.
I really dislike the male doctor in this. He has such an ego on him, its disgusting.
What is with this guy? One scene he breaks the law 80 times in a row now he is all for the law?
Yo pasé por un ataque al corazón y me hicieron un cateterismo mi diagnóstico fue una de mis arterias colapso debido a una falla genética en ella mientras estaba pasando por todo eso solo pensaba en seguir luchando sin importar nada solo quería seguir viva así que por favor nadie piense que alguien quiere dejar de existir una vez que estás ahí en ese momento luchas por ti vida con todas tus fuerzas o por lo menos ese es mi caso pero no creo ser la única que piense así ,lo que creo es que los familiares se cansan del enfermo y ya pasaron su duelo y ellos están listos para ser libres de cuidar a alguien que ocupa ayuda 24/7 pero para esos casos existen lugares que atienden pacientes por favor lucha por la vida y no decidas por otros
Why is it called "Vegetative State"?
It's more properly called post-coma unresponsiveness (PCU), but essentially it's because the patient is alive but has minimal voluntary activity, like a vegetable. It was coined in 1972 but it's not considered the most sensitive description of a human being nowadays.
In a lot of cases, when a patient is in a vegetative state they’re basically a living corpse. Awful.
@@LyingTubeit’s basically “brain death,” right? The body is alive, but it’s a shell whose brain can no longer contain the person’s mind?
I wouldn’t want to live like that and I certainly wouldn’t want my family to have to care for me for decades. Lights out, let me go as it's inhumane.
What? She wanted to kill him by giving him pneumonia? He can blink and communicate with her..was it his idea really?!
However I understand euthanasia is (there) and maybe she truly lived in the wrong state or place?!
She wasn't intending to give him pneumonia, she was trying to let him go peacefully by blocking his tracheal tube and letting him pass on. Unfortunately he ended up getting pneumonia and she got scared seeing him in so much pain
The blinking can be involuntary movement it doesn't mean anything.
honestly the guy dr is right, he understand why she did it but its still wrong and could cost the woman dr to lose her license for not reporting as a mandated reporter and thats also not the way to do it
Can't that whole family go to jail for this??
yes, yes they can. I've heard of this being tried as manslaughter before, but this mother just dragged her two other kids into this as accomplices. Once you go to prison for something like that, it sticks with you forever. It can affect your ability to find a job, get housing, and bar you from staying in certain communities (i.e. certain neighborhoods, country clubs, clubs that aren't nightclubs in general, I know a guy who got kicked out of his stable because he'd been arrested for drug possession and distribution, guy wound up having to sell his horse because no other stable would let him board). Her kids' futures are ruined because the mom didn't think to get legal counsel for this.
Unlikely the jury will convict in this case. Unless they are filled with moralising biblebashers.
They're gonna all need that lawyer now!!!
I think she didn’t want him to suffer anymore
6:39 am I delusional or did he just say time of death 18:60???😭😭
Military time🤦🏽
oh, the guy who illegally violated a woman's DNR/DNI order so she could continue being a guinea pig against her wishes suddenly cares about the legality of how to provide patient comfort? that's rich lmao he and natalie have always deserved each other
If this was afterwards, he probably learned the hard way to not go against a patients wishes.
Natalie is at fault here. She didn't call the police and continued to let the mom be with her son without any supervision knowing the mom did try to kill her son. I hope the episode shows the mom getting arrested and Natalie in trouble.
never take care of ANYONE
They can change the code status at anytime. Why didn't they just make him a DNAR?
You know, I really ought to look into getting myself a DNR - Do Not Resuscitate. I'd rather die than to live like a vegetable - and better yet, maybe I can become an organ donor too.
Would love @DoctorMike to weigh in on all of this…
Does the son "want" it or mom who sees it in the eyes. 😒
The mum reminds me of Kathy Bates
Am i the only one who heard 18:60?
The time of death is 18:60... What time is that?
that’d be 7 pm
I think what he meant was 18:16 = 6:16.
@@J.W.G.L I watched it again. Lol. He did say 16 instead of 60.
Odio al doctor Halstead
If mom is the caregiver and has power of attorney doesn’t she have the right to ask to end his care so he would pass away? Is it a state issue? I’ve heard of parents of minors choose to does this after years of caring for the child because it can take that long to be ready to let go.
His tube when she was changing it. It was build up with a lot of mucus and bacteria.
is 1860 not just 1900?
Ever heard of stayin alive? Some of the worst chest compressions ever.
Yay can't wait to watch! I can't believe I am so early
Well, I'll be starting my living will today. If God wants me alive, I'll be alive without machines and tubes. If God wants me dead, I'll die. I will not be a Chia Pet to make other people feel better.
I’m just wondering if it is legal? Cause something tells me there are certain state that allow something like this where other it’s not.
That woman should be arrested.
She and her family are probably gonna be spending 25 years of quality time together in prison.
CPR way too fast...
Time of death: 18:60?, my math ain’t mathing?!
I think he said 18:16
@@FrostBiteBS_officialI believe u r correct it was 18:16
its the military time if you still complain on it being 18:16 time has 24 hours 18:16 would be the hour within the 24 hour period
18:16 is military time. Military time uses a 24/hr clock instead of a regular 12/hr like most people are used to. So 18:16 is the equivalent to 6:16.
I am unsure how to feel about this
How many freaking times have these doctors outright broken the law?
She should go to prison they all should. The other brother put the tubes on himself to not alert anyone. Your son cant talk you dont know
Good luck getting a jury who will convict!
do you honestly believe ANYONE wants to live like that? can you even call it living?
@@dietotaku No it's not living, it's existing.
@@dietotaku I could believe someone with their sense of self but no ability to communicate it might want to keep living in the right conditions. This is where it gets complicated, because it can be extremely difficult to impossible to know how much of someone is “still in there” and how they feel about their condition. I wouldn’t feel comfortable declaring that life isn’t worth living in that state by default.
No even a thumbnail just a clip 😂
Life for life’s sake is not what it’s cracked up to be
Ilearned a dnr doesnt really prevent a personnbeing placed on life support.
DNR is for if they crash and mean they don’t get life saving measures at the end, you mean DNI which is do not intubate
hospitals get money for every person they intubate & who end up ward of the hospital. being a ward of the hospital basically means that your an atm and once they can no longer get money out of you they pull the plug
I don’t know if this is real or not but correct me if I’m wrong and one episode of house a patient was in vegetative state and house injected them with some sort of serum and the patient woke up for maximum of two days or less.
Watch. Johnny got his gun. Then decide
Now that's a movie everyone should watch what a heartbreaking movie
She still shoulda went to jail bc she killed him intentionally
She probably did.
Removing feeding tube is horrible. As med proxy she could sign a dnr tho right?
That digressed very quickly...
I’m a registered nurse and I don’t agree with the way we string people out with trachs and G-tubes but I do respect their wishes.
So dude was going way too fast on his chest compressions. Like I know that’s a stupid thing to harp on but it bothered me. Like I understand not going the full depth but at least get your pace right
That's the correct spelling for a newborn. I'm fairly confident doing that to an adult would be worse than doing nothing at all. The heart is too big to be helpful like that.
8 days late 0:10
When I tell you it makes me sick TO. MY. CORE. when caregivers or guardians of poor people who can't speak for themselves or move on their own always assume that they want to give up. I can only imagine the horror those people are thinking when their life is about to end against their will.
its not a life bud
time of death, 18:60 ??
Yes he said it in Military time
@@airsoftnerfreview7856 But 18:60 is actually 19:00
I have a advance directive in place that states my wishes. I’m very clear if I have to live on life supportive measures with no chance of recovery then they are to let me go.
I guess being dead is better then a vegetable to her she was making him finally not hurting
The Doctor Who I usually like he’s a bozo. Family matter family decision.
As a nurse, i can say that watching this gave me an infarct
cant belive im this early
"Believe"
That lady doctor is a real you know what. These people think they are? God? No I’m a registered nurse Holly like mine the doctor that God does not think he’s a doctor😉
Wow, i hope the cops get her for that!
Caregivers burn out is very real changing, washing them feed lift them to prevent bed sores. You end up collapsing
@@missytanner3501 a caregiver burning out, probably just means that the caregiver should be switched out with another trusted person to take care of the patient not to take the life of the patient into their own hands and kill them
Then they need to get the whole family. They were all in on this last act.
@@l.a.3479
Agreed, but judgments stigma, and others deciding they don't want to can color your judgment
Blood is beautiful, blood is beautiful
Irrelevant to this scene
Eww why is his tube so filthy 😡
Lo que entendí es que iban a dejar que se produjera una infección para que muriera el paciente
dang I’m early
Way to fast compressions
You have to do it to 120BPM so not too fast
Wtf?! Is wrong with the nurse!!
"Please don't hurt him", well you just murdered him so any "hurt" he felt was from that "family" of his.
Idk about the adult siblings, but mom was clearly having some kind of disassociative episode. She might have a case of 'not guilty by mental disease or defect.' At least, that's how the actress made it seem.
Sorry but what she did was terrible, she murdered her son and let him suffer more before he died slowly.
If she wanted to assist suicide, the OD him of morphine. OD him on pain medication he would have been on even in a vegative state. what she essentially did was choke him to death by clogging his breathing tube, or possibly gave him an infection.
What she did was NOT easing him or caring and NO assisted suicide would be reasoned like this
agreed
Pneu monia isnt necesarily fatal, ive had it afew times, i just hated missing work.
Given he’s got a trach he’s likely got more vulnerability since it’s an open way for infection to get in and you have a higher risk of antibiotic resistant infections
Compressions are pathetic and unrealistic.
Since real compressions break things unrealistic is the way to go.
Que recuerde en los programas cuando hacen RCP funciona entre el 60% y 75% de las veces cuando en realidad es como mucho el 10%
Why did she do that to her own son?
why’d he say “time of death 18:60” 😭
Another reason Halstead is such an unlikable character...
I am going to have to stop watching youtube because of these Kamala Harris videos. She is the only one that has laughed at the democratic process as she has been blessed Democratic nominee for president with any running mate of HER choice. Please spare me!
Jjsjsh
Will looked like a total asshole this episode with lack of compassion
Y media use me as a product
Iam not medias dad's personal property