I never got any results until I followed Jones's teachings one set , lower the weight slow, train the whole body at one time , go to failure .He truly was the G.O.A.T .
Thanks , would also like to say because free weights doesn't give you resistence through a full range of motion do not lock out [rest] when doing compound movements like bench press this then gives you constant tension and great results in building muscle .@@BdDaBOMB
Training since 1978…Bodybuilding from 1982-86 Switched to HIT in 1990, and HIT with moderate weight/quality reps is the best way to build muscle.58 going on 59,and 42 years working in construction….still going strong! #HITkeepamericastrong💪🇺🇸💪#arthurjoneswasright💪
@@brankobakic9744 Unfortunately there’s no gyms with Nautilus equipment where I live. I trained for many years at a gym that had all Nautilus equipment, but the owner passed away, and the family sold off everything….(the building was sold with the Nautilus equipment included)
He cuts through the bullshit better than anyone ever has! All of his theories and principles have been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, and still, the Fitness industry continues to drown in bullshit.
Arthur Jones' answer to *every problem* was to gather up all the *so-called* experts on the subject, load them all on a plane and then *fly the plane into the ground.* Ah. How we will miss the incredible Mr. Jones.
The only reason someone would get angry at someone lifting a weight with very little momentum is because of their egos. They know deep down their fragile personality would permit them from not ego lifting
With so many different theories being purported by different coaches, bodybuilders, muscle mags and supplement companies Arthur Jones decided he would find out what the OPTIMUM method of building muscle mass was, that's not to say there aren't other methods that will help you gain mass, but his was the OPTIMUM, by optimum I mean the maximum muscular growth in the shortest period of time without the use of steroids. He found the answer, but people didn't want to train at that intensity.
He trained with overall body workouts. HIT was what he brought to bodybuilding and people looking to improve their overall strength. He focused more on isolating muscles with his machines and doing leg presses instead of squats that way you can control the weight in different ways such as negatives as well instead of only lifting the weight.
You should read up on him. He actually tried to change the way physical education was actually done. He had scientific studies done with army football players. Half did only running and half did his HIT routines. The the ones doing HIT routines increased flexibility, their resting heart rate improved, overall strength improved by over 50% and their 2 mile run was 40 sec faster on average than those that only did the running study. The ones doing the running study showed that their flexibility..
Arthur claimed his machines were better than barbells because they provide rotary-form resistance that is direct throughout the full range of motion and has a variable resistance (making the weight heavier when the muscle is in its stronger positions). That's why they're (apparently) the best. Intensity is another kettle of fish. So is volume. However, so long as the intensity is high, volume would naturally be lower otherwise you're not really training with much intensity.
You can tell Arthur is at his wits ends with all of the misinformation going on in the fitness industry. It's no wonder he sold Nautilus the same year this seminar took place.
@@krystofodehnal9448 Yes you are right, not pure HIT .But in general he used and promote now high intensity in short trainings and long recovery like his mentor Mike Mentzer and Arthur Jones
@exarchives The whole point of nautilus is to isolate one joint and one muscle group, ie a nautilus bicep curl isolates the biceps using elbow joint. In theory, this saves the joints and tissue from loading them with weights. Since the path of the exercise is predetermined by the machine, the accident rate decreases. Since the muscles are isolated you can focus on weaker muscles and decrease imbalances. The nautilus machines isolate muscles in order to strengthen them.
Explosive movements would be quick and jerky movements using some kind of resistance. Weight training movements of HIT should be slow, forcing muscles to take the stress
You guys are mistaking the use of Nautilus machines with HIT. Big mistake. What's to stop someone spending 6 hours a day in the gym using only Nautilus machines? Or spending 15 minutes in the gym using only barbells???
What I got from that was that he didn't recommend those movements because eventhough Arthur invented Nautilus machines, he still highly valued free weights. So it sounds like he is not even recommending those movements even performed in a Nautilus machine. That's what I get from it.
@oCO: Jones was hyperbolic,dramatic,confrontational,"black & white" to the point of hostile. His points've been calmed down by successors. Goals:1/Lower chance of injury to virtual zero. 2/ Maintain meaningful resistance through full range of motion. Proper use of Nautilus,MedX,Hammer,Pendulum,SuperSlow,or RenEx machines comes infinitely closer to this goal than free weights. NFL & bodybuilders -do- use machines based on these principles, whether carrying the Nautilus brand or not.
Idk about this guy. And I have no idea why so many people heap praise upon him. Yes, he had some interesting views in regards to weight training - things we can all learn and apply to our training routines. But the guy seemed to be rude and condescending all the time. He also seems to have a very black and white mentality - "my opinion is right, if you disagree, get out of here". I get the school of thought he was trying to push here, but there's ways to do things. I don't think it's any surprise he was married and divorced multiple times and many of the people who worked for his company (e.g. Mike Mentzer) ended up leaving. I certainly wouldn't want someone like him as a boss let alone work with him.
The key sentence that you posted is That you don’t know about this guy. I met him on several occasions and visited him at his house many times - he was an individualist as He knew you with in the first sentence. I am the same way. I liked him a lot and he liked me also. He was a genius beyond your understanding. Someone once called him last free man in America. He did things his way.
Iv only just come across this man and though he is certainly interesting I just cannot figure his personality type out. He is aggressive and condesending as often as possible, I do wonder why
I do not know much about American Football as i am not from the US. But first and foremost he will need to develop his general preparedness: a certain size and structural strength is needed to take the beatings, and he will need to be able to move his relatively big body quickly and efficiently. This is not necessarily required to develop the skill of being a lineman, but without these abilities the skill will not matter.
We agree on that. It will however take a substantial amount of scientific and anecdotal evidence to convince me that strength training with machines is the safest and most efficient way to attain GPP. Until then I'll stick with the basic compound movements.
I agree with you that the 225 for reps-test does not make much sense and is a very bad indicator for how well you will perform on the field. I do not believe in functional training if that is what you think. I believe in strength training as a means of attaining general preparedness and I do not think it will have either positive or negative effect on your level of "skill" in a specific sport. But strength matters in sports, not just skill.
Produced-to compose, create, or bring about by intellectual or physical effort Arthur Jones did make a lot of nifty machines and a lot of money, I'll give you that
Also, it is not just a matter of training muscles. It is also a matter of training the body as a whole and thereby increasing once maximal strength, CNS efficiency and triggering hormonal responses that aid in recovery and performance. You can accomplish none of these things using these machine.
"explosive training is criminal"--Yes Arthur, that is so obvious to anyone thats ever done any athletic activity in existence. Because sprinting, basketball, football (both kinds), baseball, water sports, biking; none of these things require the athlete to be explosive at all. You of course know this due to the vast number of athletes you trained during your life. Training on a selectorized leg extension was going to make them better than training to be explosive, crystal clear that is.
..barely improved or did not at all. He converted many over to HIT because it is overall beneficial to your body. It is not about the amount of exercise, because that will actually prevent you from building muscle and exhaust your recovery. It is better to do something of High intensity and of high effort because it will greatly improve the exercise as long as it is done properly and with good form. He changed how people exercise for the good. Many don't realize or are uninformed about how..
My reasoning is simple - those "exercises" are based on the objective of performing them in a said manner - the anatomical becomes secondary, an afterthought so to speak. The idea is to address the body and not the implement or performance (specific) based activity. It may stimulate (key word may) structural improvement, but you are lifting a weight first and foremost in a particular manner.
As a former athlete, it does wreck havoc on the joints. 99% of all injuries comes from "explosive training." They teach not to twist, turn or torche your body while lifting weights as it will cause injuries. Explosive training is everything they tell you not to do, thus defeating the purpose. Jumping up and down with weights in your hands is what I would refer to as.....(wait for it)....stupid.
Pro athletes sacrifice their joints for their profession. In their very particular, isolated case they can justify paying the consequences later on in life but for 99.99% of the population, explosive training is stupid as hell.
..well that way of weightlifting is for you. He also trained people for usually 6 weeks and only needed to train them maybe 6-15 throughout those weeks because of the intensity. When you say his results are only produceable by him, that is not true, the only thing that people have to realize and that he was all about was the fact that HIT is key, you have to be willing to not like an exercise. "If you haven't thrown up from a single set of barbell curls you are not doing it right." -Arthur Jones
to this day the nautilus machine program has developed ZERO bodybuilding champions...although the nautilus pullover machine is the greatest weight machine ever invented
@@thoughtcriminal5655 No he didn't ..he used lots of different equipment.. His favorite was the pull over machine but that was about the only one he used
Using your logic, you should dribble a basketball to make yourself taller. The football players and bodybuilders you talk about were genetically predisposed to be big and muscular. In most cases they got bigger and stronger inspite of the training they conducted. Not because of it.
Really?, Dorian Yates was an advocate of HIT, Casey Viator, Sergio Oliva, The Mentzer brothers. In fact a lot of bodybuilders tried Jones' methods with great results. Dorian Yates was able to make great improvements on an already big physique. By the way Dorian was a 6 time Mr. Olympia. Take care.
...attributes needed in the sports. An example could be a sprinter. The strengthening of prime movers would be prioritized. Glutes and hamstrings, especially the eccentric strength of the hamstrings to reduce the risk of pulls in the late-swing face. This is not funtional training trying to make the athlete better by performing strength training alone. This is a means to develop the required levels of strength and power for the athlete to improve when doing his specific sports on the track/field
I supplied a slightly humorous quote by Arthur Jones. I don't know why you are bringing up physics, biology, and logic. Thanks for the big words. Stupid people like me forget them sometimes.
Olympic lifts is not the same as olympic weightlifting. Olympic lifts is a group of movements performed with a barbell whereas olympic weightlifting, as you said is a sport. Key attributes in both athletics and weightlifting is maximal strength, rate of force development and muscle fiber conversion.. Is it not obvious that these two groups will you at least use SOME of the same tools to achieve this?
Yes the body adapts to the skill of heaving a weight in a particular manner again. CNS efficiency? How to you get that from throwing/jerking weights. You are using buzz words to sweaten an empty pot.
He has a better Leverage System and Neuro Muscular Efficiency if you might. So you have a Guy that Lifts Heavy Weights - How does that make him a better offensive lineman in football. There are many things you don't take into consideration and take for granted - you must be formally educated.
Exercise physiology if you might is born out of the old kicked sand in your face Waterboy. If you want to attack Arthur Jones, attack his works - I'll make it simple. The Book Total Fitness the Nautilus Way has a series of articles written by Jones in the 1970s. It may cost you in all about 5 Dollars to get on the Used Book Market. Get the Book, and the critique where you think he went wrong. He did his own investigation & spent Millions - Not Grants to waste Millions like your Ex Fiz Fantasy
"Functional training," which is at best dysfunctional here in the U.S. Strength is elusive, as it is mired in many of the said chosen sports. I just simply view it as "dosage," which can only be individualized when "prescribed." Back to the Point, the Arthur Jones Video just scratches the surface, as there are many aspects that remain "unearthed." I have a Vast Biographical Archives on Film of this Man. To Start - get the book - Total Fitness the Nautilus Way You have to know the whole story.
arthur jones based his whole one set per exercise on his nautilus machines..thats how they are connected..he claimed thats all the muscle needs for a workout..ie HIT...
All performed sub-maximally, and only if the subject mastered proper technical execution of the lifts: full depth squats, romanian deadlifts, glute-ham raises, barbell glute-bridges and so on.
Sure - if you have that type of athlete - then put him position to "learn to use his genetic advantages in rehearsing the said sport" The combines in Football introduce an entry test of benching 225 for as many reps as possible and those that perform the most reps usually fail to make it as a Pro.
Actually you didn't really expose anything. But you are saying that because of the principle of specificity you should sit down and exercise on a machine with a fixed range of motion. Can you see the logical incontinuity here? That is not really going to help you in anything except sitting and exercising on a machine with a fixed range of motion. The objective of supplemental strength training in sports is not to develope the specific SKILLS of the sport but rather to develop attributes
We need more people like Arthur Jones , especially today.
He would’ve destroyed the woke fools of today.
A Truht MAN!!!
I never got any results until I followed Jones's teachings one set , lower the weight slow, train the whole body at one time , go to failure .He truly was the G.O.A.T .
In addition to recovery, you succinctly captured Jones's message. At least as I've comprehended to date
Thanks , would also like to say because free weights doesn't give you resistence through a full range of motion do not lock out [rest] when doing compound movements like bench press this then gives you constant tension and great results in building muscle .@@BdDaBOMB
But his real teacher was his gorilla, most of his time resting and only brief moments of intense exercise until failure
@@pereximepere8439 LOL Thanks for reminding me , great comment, maybe of the year if not all time .
someone should gather ALL his seminars and put them on dvds and sell them to those that get what jones was saying YEARS ago.
Ive been search for them and I cannot find anything!
Training since 1978…Bodybuilding from 1982-86 Switched to HIT in 1990, and HIT with moderate weight/quality reps is the best way to build muscle.58 going on 59,and 42 years working in construction….still going strong! #HITkeepamericastrong💪🇺🇸💪#arthurjoneswasright💪
R u still using nautilus machines?
@@brankobakic9744 Unfortunately there’s no gyms with Nautilus equipment where I live. I trained for many years at a gym that had all Nautilus equipment, but the owner passed away, and the family sold off everything….(the building was sold with the Nautilus equipment included)
He cuts through the bullshit better than anyone ever has! All of his theories and principles have been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, and still, the Fitness industry continues to drown in bullshit.
True, the fitness industry is full of crap 💩
Arthur Jones' answer to *every problem* was to gather up all the *so-called* experts on the subject, load them all on a plane and then *fly the plane into the ground.* Ah. How we will miss the incredible Mr. Jones.
Instablaster.
Do you have the exact quote of him saying this? I can’t find it
@@nate8415 at the end of this very video as a matter of fact.
Why is he holding back? Wish he would tell us what he really thinks.
Speak it ..the truth I'm 58 still smashing lifting correctly not with my ego
The only reason someone would get angry at someone lifting a weight with very little momentum is because of their egos. They know deep down their fragile personality would permit them from not ego lifting
Arthur Jones is the epitome of what people nowadays call based and red-pilled.
Troo
Arthur Jones wasn't just red-pilled, he was a walking red pill.
With so many different theories being purported by different coaches, bodybuilders, muscle mags and supplement companies Arthur Jones decided he would find out what the OPTIMUM method of building muscle mass was, that's not to say there aren't other methods that will help you gain mass, but his was the OPTIMUM, by optimum I mean the maximum muscular growth in the shortest period of time without the use of steroids. He found the answer, but people didn't want to train at that intensity.
Oh my god I love this video so much. I've come back to it probably 15 times now over the last few months.
What a Genius! Beautiful combination of clear clever and fearless mind!
He trained with overall body workouts. HIT was what he brought to bodybuilding and people looking to improve their overall strength. He focused more on isolating muscles with his machines and doing leg presses instead of squats that way you can control the weight in different ways such as negatives as well instead of only lifting the weight.
You should read up on him. He actually tried to change the way physical education was actually done. He had scientific studies done with army football players. Half did only running and half did his HIT routines. The the ones doing HIT routines increased flexibility, their resting heart rate improved, overall strength improved by over 50% and their 2 mile run was 40 sec faster on average than those that only did the running study. The ones doing the running study showed that their flexibility..
thanks
Arthur claimed his machines were better than barbells because they provide rotary-form resistance that is direct throughout the full range of motion and has a variable resistance (making the weight heavier when the muscle is in its stronger positions). That's why they're (apparently) the best. Intensity is another kettle of fish. So is volume. However, so long as the intensity is high, volume would naturally be lower otherwise you're not really training with much intensity.
A 747 & fly it into a mountain 🏔
Great idea 💡
Let’s put all our politicians on the same flight ✈️
And experts in other industries
You can tell Arthur is at his wits ends with all of the misinformation going on in the fitness industry. It's no wonder he sold Nautilus the same year this seminar took place.
this guy should have run for President!
he was 64,000 miles to the right of Atila the Hun
HIT works, Heavy Duty works. I am living proof. I am hoping to compete with in the next few years.
HIT is the best way to build muscle, and continue training injury free indefinitely 👍💪
@@boomersD9CAT Actually it's quite the opposite
@@krystofodehnal9448 Say that to 6 times Mr.Olimpia Dorian Yates HITer
@@pereximepere8439 Dorian is my favourite bodybuilder. His training is not the same as pure HIT
@@krystofodehnal9448 Yes you are right, not pure HIT .But in general he used and promote now high intensity in short trainings and long recovery like his mentor Mike Mentzer and Arthur Jones
I like this guy. He doesn't mince words.
Hahaha no pc language with him!
Love to see arthur comment on crossfit
No doubt he is Rolling in his grave! Ha
As I was watching this it went threw my mind about the cross fit I can imagine steam coming out of arthers ears
Hahahahahaha, me too!!
I was thinking the same thing
@exarchives
The whole point of nautilus is to isolate one joint and one muscle group, ie a nautilus bicep curl isolates the biceps using elbow joint. In theory, this saves the joints and tissue from loading them with weights. Since the path of the exercise is predetermined by the machine, the accident rate decreases. Since the muscles are isolated you can focus on weaker muscles and decrease imbalances.
The nautilus machines isolate muscles in order to strengthen them.
A genius...a man ahead of his time...
Awesome video, Arthur Jones was a genious!
Is there any chance you can get more of his videos?
Jones + Mike Mentzer sound exactly alike!!!
One of, if not the most, interesting guys in fitness history.
awesome video! thanks for sharing it.
HAHA
What a legend.
Right!
Does anyone know where I can find the whole video?
Explosive movements would be quick and jerky movements using some kind of resistance. Weight training movements of HIT should be slow, forcing muscles to take the stress
You guys are mistaking the use of Nautilus machines with HIT. Big mistake. What's to stop someone spending 6 hours a day in the gym using only Nautilus machines? Or spending 15 minutes in the gym using only barbells???
What I got from that was that he didn't recommend those movements because eventhough Arthur invented Nautilus machines, he still highly valued free weights. So it sounds like he is not even recommending those movements even performed in a Nautilus machine. That's what I get from it.
might wanna work on your hearing comprehension skills
@oCO: Jones was hyperbolic,dramatic,confrontational,"black & white" to the point of hostile. His points've been calmed down by successors. Goals:1/Lower chance of injury to virtual zero. 2/ Maintain meaningful resistance through full range of motion. Proper use of Nautilus,MedX,Hammer,Pendulum,SuperSlow,or RenEx machines comes infinitely closer to this goal than free weights. NFL & bodybuilders -do- use machines based on these principles, whether carrying the Nautilus brand or not.
Love this clip !
I wonder what exercises he DOES recommend for football since he doesn't recommend squats or bench press.
We need Men to be Men again, and talk like King Arthur!
This guy rules
"That's pure bullshit."
Classic.
Can anyone tell me exactly what the questioner was saying?
I spoke to him in more recent years and I told him he was lucky to get out when he did.
Why ??
This rocks.
AJ is a god damn hero to me.
Don't forget " you can bring an elephant down with one properly placed shot " best saying ever .
Upload rest,please!
Idk about this guy. And I have no idea why so many people heap praise upon him. Yes, he had some interesting views in regards to weight training - things we can all learn and apply to our training routines.
But the guy seemed to be rude and condescending all the time. He also seems to have a very black and white mentality - "my opinion is right, if you disagree, get out of here". I get the school of thought he was trying to push here, but there's ways to do things.
I don't think it's any surprise he was married and divorced multiple times and many of the people who worked for his company (e.g. Mike Mentzer) ended up leaving.
I certainly wouldn't want someone like him as a boss let alone work with him.
The key sentence that you posted is That you don’t know about this guy. I met him on several occasions and visited him at his house many times - he was an individualist as He knew you with in the first sentence. I am the same way. I liked him a lot and he liked me also. He was a genius beyond your understanding. Someone once called him last free man in America. He did things his way.
Iv only just come across this man and though he is certainly interesting I just cannot figure his personality type out.
He is aggressive and condesending as often as possible, I do wonder why
I do not know much about American Football as i am not from the US. But first and foremost he will need to develop his general preparedness: a certain size and structural strength is needed to take the beatings, and he will need to be able to move his relatively big body quickly and efficiently. This is not necessarily required to develop the skill of being a lineman, but without these abilities the skill will not matter.
I wish we could better hear what was being said at the 3:00 mark.
Furthermore, Arthur argued that so long as the intensity is high, any trainee can make great progress using only barbells.
True
The best way to try no question about it.
We agree on that. It will however take a substantial amount of scientific and anecdotal evidence to convince me that strength training with machines is the safest and most efficient way to attain GPP. Until then I'll stick with the basic compound movements.
@Beethovens7th ..I've been back 5 times just today!
MORE!!!
I agree with you that the 225 for reps-test does not make much sense and is a very bad indicator for how well you will perform on the field. I do not believe in functional training if that is what you think. I believe in strength training as a means of attaining general preparedness and I do not think it will have either positive or negative effect on your level of "skill" in a specific sport. But strength matters in sports, not just skill.
So you would say that a guy squatting 600lbs is not stronger than a guy squatting 200lbs, he is just better at the skill of lifting weight?
I miss straight talkers like him, glad he’s gone before the world went woke
Produced-to compose, create, or bring about by intellectual or physical effort
Arthur Jones did make a lot of nifty machines and a lot of money, I'll give you that
Also, it is not just a matter of training muscles. It is also a matter of training the body as a whole and thereby increasing once maximal strength, CNS efficiency and triggering hormonal responses that aid in recovery and performance. You can accomplish none of these things using these machine.
What kind of mistakes did Arthur make that damaged his joints??
Too many sets is my guess.
He was against the long workouts of doing many sets many bodybuilders were doing. Lots of wear and tear on the joints.
"explosive training is criminal"--Yes Arthur, that is so obvious to anyone thats ever done any athletic activity in existence. Because sprinting, basketball, football (both kinds), baseball, water sports, biking; none of these things require the athlete to be explosive at all. You of course know this due to the vast number of athletes you trained during your life. Training on a selectorized leg extension was going to make them better than training to be explosive, crystal clear that is.
He referring to doing it with weights you stupid cunt lol
That ending remark ROFL
Is Explosion training such as power cleans self destructive like what arthur jones says?
..barely improved or did not at all. He converted many over to HIT because it is overall beneficial to your body. It is not about the amount of exercise, because that will actually prevent you from building muscle and exhaust your recovery. It is better to do something of High intensity and of high effort because it will greatly improve the exercise as long as it is done properly and with good form. He changed how people exercise for the good. Many don't realize or are uninformed about how..
Nautilus Rocks and HIT is IT! - check out my videos and website for proof - Markus Reinhardt "High Intensity Trainer"
I wish Arthur was my dad
No, it is Today's Training that is wasting the trainees time with injuries beyond belief - names of which have Never been seen - Jones was a Genius
Nautilus is far better than any barbell or bodyweight exercise
+MrJayrhine Arthur Jones, the inventor of Nautilus machines, would disagree with that.
nope
@@altratronic What the fuck do you think he's advocating in this video?
@exarchives would you sell copies for a nominal fee?
My reasoning is simple - those "exercises" are based on the objective of performing them in a said manner - the anatomical becomes secondary, an afterthought so to speak. The idea is to address the body and not the implement or performance (specific) based activity. It may stimulate (key word may) structural improvement, but you are lifting a weight first and foremost in a particular manner.
My UA-cam Videos only are partial - The whole Originals are in my DVD and Video Library
Explosive training is stupid? Tell that to professional athletes.
As a former athlete, it does wreck havoc on the joints. 99% of all injuries comes from "explosive training." They teach not to twist, turn or torche your body while lifting weights as it will cause injuries. Explosive training is everything they tell you not to do, thus defeating the purpose. Jumping up and down with weights in your hands is what I would refer to as.....(wait for it)....stupid.
Pro athletes sacrifice their joints for their profession. In their very particular, isolated case they can justify paying the consequences later on in life but for 99.99% of the population, explosive training is stupid as hell.
All I can say Is that I prefer relish on my hot-dog sir!
is it on you tube ???
..well that way of weightlifting is for you. He also trained people for usually 6 weeks and only needed to train them maybe 6-15 throughout those weeks because of the intensity. When you say his results are only produceable by him, that is not true, the only thing that people have to realize and that he was all about was the fact that HIT is key, you have to be willing to not like an exercise. "If you haven't thrown up from a single set of barbell curls you are not doing it right." -Arthur Jones
Yes, I appreciate that you have very good taste. I have to get a new Digital Video Camera and may add more over time.
Wait, barbell training won’t help strength and will ruin your joints? He reminds me of LBJ.
He never said that , moving free weights explosively or fast will ruin your joints .
I read clearly - just not the way you want me to
explosive movments?
to this day the nautilus machine program has developed ZERO bodybuilding champions...although the nautilus pullover machine is the greatest weight machine ever invented
Dorian Yates trained almost exclusively with nautilus machines 🤦😂
@@thoughtcriminal5655 No he didn't ..he used lots of different equipment.. His favorite was the pull over machine but that was about the only one he used
@sinnerstefan - Yes - I have several DVDS of Original Footage
@Nobama1028 or see my auctions at exarchives on Ebay
Using your logic, you should dribble a basketball to make yourself taller. The football players and bodybuilders you talk about were genetically predisposed to be big and muscular. In most cases they got bigger and stronger inspite of the training they conducted. Not because of it.
Really?, Dorian Yates was an advocate of HIT, Casey Viator, Sergio Oliva, The Mentzer brothers. In fact a lot of bodybuilders tried Jones' methods with great results. Dorian Yates was able to make great improvements on an already big physique. By the way Dorian was a 6 time Mr. Olympia. Take care.
...attributes needed in the sports. An example could be a sprinter. The strengthening of prime movers would be prioritized. Glutes and hamstrings, especially the eccentric strength of the hamstrings to reduce the risk of pulls in the late-swing face. This is not funtional training trying to make the athlete better by performing strength training alone. This is a means to develop the required levels of strength and power for the athlete to improve when doing his specific sports on the track/field
Explosive training is criminal? When regarding bodybuilding of course right?
Makeveli The Don any kind of training apart from Olympic lifts, but that's still retarded af because you're guarandamnteed to get injured.
I supplied a slightly humorous quote by Arthur Jones. I don't know why you are bringing up physics, biology, and logic. Thanks for the big words. Stupid people like me forget them sometimes.
Olympic lifts is not the same as olympic weightlifting. Olympic lifts is a group of movements performed with a barbell whereas olympic weightlifting, as you said is a sport. Key attributes in both athletics and weightlifting is maximal strength, rate of force development and muscle fiber conversion.. Is it not obvious that these two groups will you at least use SOME of the same tools to achieve this?
You should be, you know a lot! You should also make videos on your channel, big fan!
Yes the body adapts to the skill of heaving a weight in a particular manner again. CNS efficiency? How to you get that from throwing/jerking weights. You are using buzz words to sweaten an empty pot.
Lol simple truth.
He has a better Leverage System and Neuro Muscular Efficiency if you might. So you have a Guy that Lifts Heavy Weights - How does that make him a better offensive lineman in football. There are many things you don't take into consideration and take for granted - you must be formally educated.
Exercise physiology if you might is born out of the old kicked sand in your face Waterboy. If you want to attack Arthur Jones, attack his works - I'll make it simple. The Book Total Fitness the Nautilus Way has a series of articles written by Jones in the 1970s. It may cost you in all about 5 Dollars to get on the Used Book Market. Get the Book, and the critique where you think he went wrong. He did his own investigation & spent Millions - Not Grants to waste Millions like your Ex Fiz Fantasy
Only nautilus machine is a pull over one.
"Functional training," which is at best dysfunctional here in the U.S. Strength is elusive, as it is mired in many of the said chosen sports. I just simply view it as "dosage," which can only be individualized when "prescribed." Back to the Point, the Arthur Jones Video just scratches the surface, as there are many aspects that remain "unearthed." I have a Vast Biographical Archives on Film of this Man. To Start - get the book - Total Fitness the Nautilus Way You have to know the whole story.
arthur jones based his whole one set per exercise on his nautilus machines..thats how they are connected..he claimed thats all the muscle needs for a workout..ie HIT...
@oCOSMICeyes
All performed sub-maximally, and only if the subject mastered proper technical execution of the lifts: full depth squats, romanian deadlifts, glute-ham raises, barbell glute-bridges and so on.
Sure - if you have that type of athlete - then put him position to "learn to use his genetic advantages in rehearsing the said sport" The combines in Football introduce an entry test of benching 225 for as many reps as possible and those that perform the most reps usually fail to make it as a Pro.
Ever been to a commercial gym?
Actually you didn't really expose anything. But you are saying that because of the principle of specificity you should sit down and exercise on a machine with a fixed range of motion. Can you see the logical incontinuity here? That is not really going to help you in anything except sitting and exercising on a machine with a fixed range of motion. The objective of supplemental strength training in sports is not to develope the specific SKILLS of the sport but rather to develop attributes
That's is total non sequitur lol
How the fuck are you this stupid?
Explosive power and endurance is not built in the weight room but on the track.