Well explained sir... Kindly make your own UA-cam channel for today's youth tha will be the most beneficial for building our analytical skills and will be helpful for our incoming exams
Excellent mentor. Solid and comprehensive policy analysis. Overall, justice would be undermined, the judiciary will be politicized just like the bureaucracy, and the governance will be eclipsed.
very well explained, you didn't only explained the impact of this amendment on government but also with that you touched all the other grounds going to be effected.
Sir Uzair bht insightful opinion deitay hein. Learned a lot and he makes things easier for understanding. As long as this question is concerned k hamari Kya opinion hai to I agree with all the discussion and understand k Sirf ek person ki zid m institution ko completely damage kr diya. Regressive Amendment!
On what basis you include PBC nominee in the strength of the Executive? Why you don't differentiate between Legislature and Executive? aligning both together
Sir, In my point of view our political system is, undoubtedly, militarized and now our judiciary became politicized. Can we not say that military has brought the judiciary under its own control indirectly? It is because that after this amendment undemocratic forces will pressurize political parties specially in government regarding to judiciary for their own interests.
Sir you discussed all only disadvantages of the amendment. Everybody knows, government has passed amendment for itself, but there are few advantages; Term of CJP, 179 Article 259, 230, 229, 193, 203C. However, government has passed the amendment for herself because selection of Judges, and article 215 CEC will perform his duties until his successor enters upon the office, means if CEC once completes his tenure then he will be used by government which is much loss full for opposition
Respected sir, u said that we all know who backed executive..! By my point of view this Govt. Is not willing to do so, but again they compelled to do this. I think u understood my point
Sir in my opinion, non of the government except PPP government (2008-2013) have completed their term, that is the main reason of political and economic instability in Pakistan. Before 18th amendment 58(2)B were used to dethroned a prime minister very easily. After 18th amendment supreme court play such role to abolish a government before completing their tenure. I think 26th amendment will ensure the completion of governmental term.
Just by completing a 5 year tenure a government cannot bring stability, at least three or more consecutive terms by the same government would be required while being on the same page with establishment and judiciary. And what performance did all of the previous governments showed us in their two or three years by which we can estimate that they would bring stability if given more time?
On my point of view Pakistan doesn't make one nation in 77 years, every where we are seeing the separation. This amendment is not big think, next party comes and make it for their benefits. Now I am looking in ground what's going on, I fell, I would migrate in another country. There is no life.
Weak and politician analysis. Despite a fact that the long lasting controversial role of judiciary since inception still scurrilous judiciary, show biases opinion. Everyone knows the soaring of political cases in judiciary and burden of these cases divert judiciary concentration form criminal and civil cases of common people. The existing political cases in supreme court is about 10% and about 90% time of a courts wasted on such cases. These are some reasons that why, Pakistan judiciary ranked the lowest in global judiciary ranking. Although, there are many things to debatable but unbiased analysis makes it fruitful platform for viewers.
Aam admi k liya bahut Kuch hai o ye political stability judges k hato say kharab nhi hogi our economy kharab nhi hogi apki analysis independent nhi hai
میں سمجھ نہیں پا رہا اتنے قابل انسان کیوں سمجھ نہیں پا رہے ۔ جمہوریت غیر اسلامی نظام ہے (یہاں تو خیر ظلم کا نظام ہے) اور غیر اسلامی نظام کے تحت زندگی گزارنا گناہ کبیرہ ہے۔ اور اپ پریشان ہو رہے ظلم کے نظام میں خرابیوں سے
Well explained sir... Kindly make your own UA-cam channel for today's youth tha will be the most beneficial for building our analytical skills and will be helpful for our incoming exams
Agree
😂😂 Agree. Bad news for WTI
Yes please
After listening thi lecture i was looking for his own channel😅
@@Iqraabdulrasool39 Unfortunately he is not on UA-cam, despite being a very competent teacher
.
One of my favourite Mentor teacher and Leader Sr Uzair Stay blessed And Happy.
Keep it up.
Sir Uzair khan's way of expression is very clear and easy to understand. Thank you sir and JWT
Most awaited lecture by favorite Mentor!!
Excellent mentor. Solid and comprehensive policy analysis. Overall, justice would be undermined, the judiciary will be politicized just like the bureaucracy, and the governance will be eclipsed.
This sir explains everything clearly. Try to make more and more videos with this sir.
Outstanding way of explanation.Everything is elaborated in a very well manner.Stay blessed
very well explained, you didn't only explained the impact of this amendment on government but also with that you touched all the other grounds going to be effected.
Such a great explanation! Looking to the cons of the matter and targeting them with backed reasons.
Amazing!
Sir Uzair bht insightful opinion deitay hein.
Learned a lot and he makes things easier for understanding.
As long as this question is concerned k hamari Kya opinion hai to I agree with all the discussion and understand k Sirf ek person ki zid m institution ko completely damage kr diya. Regressive Amendment!
Thank you for shading light on burning issue of the time with a very constructive opinions
Very interesting discussion about amendment.
Really fruitful ❤
Informative video nicely elaborated 26th amendment.
Amazing. 💐🌟
Very well explained
Behtreen explaination.
I agree with all your discussion. Good job 🎉🎉
❤ amazing explained
Well analyzed.❤
Well explained ❤
Very nicely explained.👍🌟
what an explaination😮❤
Bhht shkria sir g u really make my mind clear
Explained well and nice opinion!
On what basis you include PBC nominee in the strength of the Executive? Why you don't differentiate between Legislature and Executive? aligning both together
Because its parliamentary system and in parliamentary system of Government Executive and Legislature are fused.
Nice explanation ❤
Zbrdst.. plz current affairs ki videos isitrha se define krwaya kre . Easy or understanding wording me.
wonderful opinions. but can we write in css exam such an open opinion if a question comes regarding 26th amendment?
Great analysis
100 likes dyny ka option 😒 q nahi hay UA-cam pa
Great 👍
Great !
Wow he explained so well.
Sir, In my point of view our political system is, undoubtedly, militarized and now our judiciary became politicized. Can we not say that military has brought the judiciary under its own control indirectly? It is because that after this amendment undemocratic forces will pressurize political parties specially in government regarding to judiciary for their own interests.
Very well explained. The Supreme Court of Pakistan now became a 'political tooth'.
Please upload text of this amendment in description
Nice Explanation.. have this person don't have his UA-cam channel?
Very well explained
Well explained
Great 💯
Sir if constitutional banch reject the decision of judge so they will have some justification or reject it for free
good job hazour uzair sain ❤
Foremost, the parliament was incomplete. Senators weren't elected from KP and special seats in NA were not yet allocated.
One of most difficult task is to understand the judiciary
So true. Couldn't agree more.🙁
Does anyone have in pdf?
Sir you discussed all only disadvantages of the amendment. Everybody knows, government has passed amendment for itself, but there are few advantages;
Term of CJP, 179
Article 259,
230,
229,
193,
203C.
However, government has passed the amendment for herself because selection of Judges, and article 215 CEC will perform his duties until his successor enters upon the office, means if CEC once completes his tenure then he will be used by government which is much loss full for opposition
So what is the other side of the picture?
Before 26th Constitutional Amendment. our judiciary was exemplary ?
jo kasar reh gayiii thii wo bhii puuuri hogaiii
Respected sir, u said that we all know who backed executive..! By my point of view this Govt. Is not willing to do so, but again they compelled to do this. I think u understood my point
This bloody government first destroyed economy and now judicial sysytem😢
Sir in my opinion, non of the government except PPP government (2008-2013) have completed their term, that is the main reason of political and economic instability in Pakistan. Before 18th amendment 58(2)B were used to dethroned a prime minister very easily. After 18th amendment supreme court play such role to abolish a government before completing their tenure.
I think 26th amendment will ensure the completion of governmental term.
Ppp also couldn't completed their tenure
Just by completing a 5 year tenure a government cannot bring stability, at least three or more consecutive terms by the same government would be required while being on the same page with establishment and judiciary. And what performance did all of the previous governments showed us in their two or three years by which we can estimate that they would bring stability if given more time?
Not PPP, but PM@@ChaudharyZainRana
عزیر سر کونسے اخبار میں کالم لکھتا ہے۔پلیز
Akhbar ka naam hi.
Kuch na kaho. Khamosh raho.
But tooth will be political...ah best analysis 😮
Sir uzair ab wakeel bhi ban gye hn. Great man
play nh hu rha
MA SHA ALLAH
Kis kis n background M Khan ki Tasweer dakhee h ❤❤
i will add the point that K BaBa Rahmaty jesy C.justice kesy independent thy is amendment se phly ager in jesu ka rasta block howa hy to best hy.
Does Uzaid Saab Teach any subject in any Academy for CSS?
Yes, he teaches in government college, chicho ki malian. 😂😂
Good Sir
But doesn't this increased role of parliament strengthen democracy?
My favorite murshid❤❤❤❤
👍 10:22
On my point of view Pakistan doesn't make one nation in 77 years, every where we are seeing the separation. This amendment is not big think, next party comes and make it for their benefits. Now I am looking in ground what's going on, I fell, I would migrate in another country. There is no life.
Well Explained but very bias analysis. You didn't mention the role of Saqib Nisar or Similar Judges?
مختصر یہ ہے کہ جس کی حکومت اس کا ہی چیف جسٹس
❤❤❤
why does he sound like awaid irshad (pas)
❤
Immediate relief is always long term problem
Pak is like France 1 to 5th Republic
What is insightful in this video even a streat hawker has same opinion.
Justice Mansoor to kahega😂😊
Very good rata system
Suo moto power demolish ni ki blke constitutional bench ko transfer kr di gy hai
Yes, I totally agree with you.
Saaaaiinnnn Sach keh kar khud Chaly gae hain ........ Sarkar Saaaano viiii layyyyy jao😂
Sir speak in eng
ملک میں میں پہلے ہی انصاف نایاب تھا باقی بھی کباڑہ ہو گیا۔
Weak and politician analysis. Despite a fact that the long lasting controversial role of judiciary since inception still scurrilous judiciary, show biases opinion. Everyone knows the soaring of political cases in judiciary and burden of these cases divert judiciary concentration form criminal and civil cases of common people. The existing political cases in supreme court is about 10% and about 90% time of a courts wasted on such cases. These are some reasons that why, Pakistan judiciary ranked the lowest in global judiciary ranking. Although, there are many things to debatable but unbiased analysis makes it fruitful platform for viewers.
Your analysis is also biased. But both of you are showing two sides of picture. This amedment is not a solution as well.
condemn govt move😢
I love nawaz sharif
💔
Aam admi k liya bahut Kuch hai o ye political stability judges k hato say kharab nhi hogi our economy kharab nhi hogi apki analysis independent nhi hai
Its clear they are bachaing khd ko😅
He is not discussing postives
Bss is country ka Allah hi haafizz hai ab ....kuke ab ek bandaa jaae to jaae Kaaha
Biased opinion
Milk ko than krhhy ha roz ba roz , power Sara coas k pas ha ab
Pro PTI haiy ..biased discussion
A little bit biased opinion...
میں سمجھ نہیں پا رہا اتنے قابل انسان کیوں سمجھ نہیں پا رہے ۔ جمہوریت غیر اسلامی نظام ہے (یہاں تو خیر ظلم کا نظام ہے) اور غیر اسلامی نظام کے تحت زندگی گزارنا گناہ کبیرہ ہے۔ اور اپ پریشان ہو رہے ظلم کے نظام میں خرابیوں سے
Youthi is highlighting the amendment . Hahahah
Biased approach
It's one sided analysis
Bad step
Useless talk. Note judiciary role in the past.
Biased man
Well explained