Pfalz E.I

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 сер 2024
  • The Pfalz E.I was a German, single-seat monoplane fighter contemporaneous with the Fokker Eindecker, which it closely resembles. In fact both share a common ancestor in the Morane-Saulnier Type H. It saw relatively limited service during the Fokker Scourge, and is generally regarded as not being quite as good as the Fokker, though this is somewhat of a questionable opinion. Like the Fokker, it was quite obsolete by mid-1916, but continued to see service in other arenas, and as a trainer.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @charlesramos4294
    @charlesramos4294 2 роки тому +1

    Very informative mini-documentary on the early Pfalz monoplanes! I wondered why their E.III version is rarely mentioned. Thank You! 😉

  • @classicalvintagecollector
    @classicalvintagecollector Місяць тому

    Thanks for putting together a video on this plane. Are you able to do one on the Halberstadt cl.ii?

  • @gunshipgray4295
    @gunshipgray4295 2 роки тому +2

    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻😁😁😁😁

  • @hlynnkeith9334
    @hlynnkeith9334 3 роки тому +3

    5:09 "Like the Eindekkers, the Pfalz monoplanes . . . ."
    You just said, "Like the monoplanes, the Pfalz monoplanes . . . ."
    Not all Fokkers were Eindekkers. Not all Eindekkers were Fokkers. When you speak of Eindekkers, you must qualify the type with the make; that is, Fokker Eindekker and Pfalz Eindekker. Technically, all the Taube airplanes may be designated Eindekker. Thus, Etrich Eindekker, Albatros Eindekker, Aviatik Eindekker, DFW Eindekker, usw.
    eindekker (one wing) = monoplane Pfalz E.I = Pfalz Eindekker I
    doppeldekker (double (two) wing) = biplane Fokker D.VII = Fokker Doppeldekker VII (Late in the war this changed when Idflieg designated all fighters as D models. Thus, the Fokker E.V became the Fokker D.VIII.)
    dreidekker (three wing) = triplane Fokker Dr.I = Fokker Dreidekker I (Albatros and Pfalz also built Dreidekkers. All were number Dr.I. I have found no evidence that there was ever a Dr.II made by anybody.)

    • @Forgotten_Aviation
      @Forgotten_Aviation  3 роки тому +3

      I take your point. I should point out in my defence, that you are now getting into my earlier videos, and that were I to make it now, I would probably do things somewhat differently. But thank you for your feedback.

  • @joeparness1290
    @joeparness1290 4 роки тому +2

    fWhen an eindecker isn't really an "Eiindecker",

    • @Forgotten_Aviation
      @Forgotten_Aviation  4 роки тому +2

      ... then it's probably a Pfalz. :)

    • @thegreat_I_am
      @thegreat_I_am 2 місяці тому

      It’s still an Eindekker, which just means monoplane.