How NASAMS anti-aircraft missile systems enhance Ukrainian air defense capabilities | DW News

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 вер 2022
  • Ukraine is aiming to deploy more advanced weapons in its push-back against Russian forces. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy says Ukraine has taken deilvery of a sophisticated air defence system, called NASAMS from the US. Russia currently controls around 15 percent of Ukraine - and, as we heard, Moscow is preparing to formally annex these areas following the so-called referendums. How will the NAMSAMS weapons systems change the way Ukraine fights this war?
    Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/deutsche...
    For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
    Follow DW on social media:
    ►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
    ►Twitter: / dwnews
    ►Instagram: / dwnews
    ►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
    Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
    #NASAMS #Ukraine #Russia

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @user-lx9jm1wo3h
    @user-lx9jm1wo3h Рік тому +384

    It's crazy how all this is happening in 2022... Kinda makes you realize that the world will always be this way no matter how advanced and connected we all are.

    • @nikkotan2840
      @nikkotan2840 Рік тому

      It comes down to a political leadership for being Greedy, Tyrant, Incompetent and so on. No matter how connected is the 21st century the fact remains a country is still run by humans.

    • @kinngrimm
      @kinngrimm Рік тому

      Maybe that is one possible aspect of a future. Then again maybe we dig too deep and awake the balrog ... i mean the GAI will eradicate us or we do it ourselves, which in a sense when creating a GAI which we loose controll of would be the same. Maybe due to cripr9 and the available proten folding contributed by deepmind we could instead eradicate all deseases or we create a super virus which kills all of us ... . We clearly have options here ^^.

    • @neoreign
      @neoreign Рік тому

      @@James-pc1ku Couldn't agree more, I rarely watch or comment on this stuff.

    • @neoreign
      @neoreign Рік тому +2

      @Don juan You'll see, something so beautiful you can't even imagine is coming. By the way, nothing bad will happen at all, let's just leave it at that.

    • @anoniem9518
      @anoniem9518 Рік тому +24

      As long as there are dictators we could end up in these horrible situations.

  • @jarls5890
    @jarls5890 Рік тому +403

    The advantage of the NASAMS AFAIK is that all the batteries and radars are integrated with each other over distance - so that the system figures out, as a whole, which launcher is in the best position to engage a target. Also with multiple simultaneous targets it is able to distribute the load on the various targets so that all targets are engaged optimally.

    • @xbandosx1
      @xbandosx1 Рік тому +15

      But... the S-300 and S-400 are still better.

    • @thatotherguy7596
      @thatotherguy7596 Рік тому +89

      @@xbandosx1 Sure they are 😁😆😅😂🤣

    • @davidjones6389
      @davidjones6389 Рік тому +38

      @@xbandosx1 LOL!

    • @MrFlyguy071
      @MrFlyguy071 Рік тому +4

      Any chance AWACS could be used as fire control and quasi direct engagement 🤔🤔🤔

    • @willberry6434
      @willberry6434 Рік тому +15

      @@xbandosx1 LOOOOL

  • @aardvarkmindshank
    @aardvarkmindshank Рік тому +94

    DW now definitely one of my go-to sources for unbiased accurate war reports.

    • @steelgear3876
      @steelgear3876 Рік тому

      Not really. They seem to stop short of really going after the German government when it comes to their dithering and slowness in decision making. Especially with reference to the Russo-Ukrainian war.

    • @bastiananuss1727
      @bastiananuss1727 Рік тому +5

      they really do a great job, especially the interviews with all the experts around the world, keep it up DW!

    • @cuc6410
      @cuc6410 Рік тому +1

      War reports 😄 🤣

    • @fekularsome2363
      @fekularsome2363 Рік тому

      DW is biased news cha nnel they only serve their purposes!

    • @arinternationalsas
      @arinternationalsas Рік тому +3

      sarcastic??

  • @Digmen1
    @Digmen1 Рік тому +155

    yes protecing cities and factories and ammo dumps etc from air attack has got to be a good thing
    Long Live Ukraine
    Long Live Poland
    Long Live Norway

    • @shesathome
      @shesathome Рік тому +1

      Ucraine virtually has no more factories just small repair shops.

    • @mivapusa
      @mivapusa Рік тому +8

      And still they dap on the Russians

    • @robbietorkelsonn8509
      @robbietorkelsonn8509 Рік тому +8

      @@shesathome yes they do, in Bulgaria
      they also have ammo depots in Poland
      you know ... where they can't be targeted

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 Рік тому +2

      @@shesathome How do you know this?

    • @shesathome
      @shesathome Рік тому +1

      @@daydays12 Intelligence!

  • @daviddorger6916
    @daviddorger6916 Рік тому +128

    For those unfamiliar with American weapons systems, most are 100% domestically produced and designed but we do not hesitate for a second to collaborate with allies if the end result is a great weapon system that provides a decisive advantage. Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Poland all have great weapons programs. We do not need bragging rights or need to puff our chests and pretend we are the best at everything all the time. A little humility goes a long way. Bottom line is you must provide your soldiers with the supplies, weapons, training, equipment, and leadership needed to destroy whoever needs to be destroyed. It does not make much difference who made what as long as you win.

    • @assertivekarma1909
      @assertivekarma1909 Рік тому +17

      Multiple hubs of innovation among allies is ideal, as long as some don't become a source of leaks to adversaries.

    • @daviddorger6916
      @daviddorger6916 Рік тому +7

      @@assertivekarma1909 amen 🙏

    • @Vatnik_tschistilka
      @Vatnik_tschistilka Рік тому +2

      The US is also basin the constellation class on the Italian FREMM-frigates and I assume the next IFV for the army migth well come from Europe too.

    • @springbloom5940
      @springbloom5940 Рік тому +1

      FALSE

    • @gautambatwar7231
      @gautambatwar7231 Рік тому

      Good insight... India needs such help and support....

  • @hugodesrosiers-plaisance3156
    @hugodesrosiers-plaisance3156 Рік тому +38

    Mr Ripley is a good communicator. Very interesting commentary.
    Now I've often commented the following, but here I go again : you people at DW are doing some very good work through this war. Cheers.

    • @Leadfoot_P71
      @Leadfoot_P71 Рік тому

      And this anchor has the smoothest voice. He should do ASMR vids!

  • @isoljator
    @isoljator Рік тому +196

    Very clear commentary, indeed. May those defence capabilities be put to good use. Props to the US for walking the walk.

    • @IBTU
      @IBTU Рік тому

      The same United States that has military bases all over the world and been in more wars any country in the last 50 years

    • @themc.kennyshow6585
      @themc.kennyshow6585 Рік тому +13

      And props to Norway for making it, giving it to them, for them to give

    • @kdoney5519
      @kdoney5519 Рік тому +1

      How do they stack up against a nuke

    • @frozenglaicericet-pose6104
      @frozenglaicericet-pose6104 Рік тому

      Not hearing much about Biden's crackhead son anymore

    • @frozenglaicericet-pose6104
      @frozenglaicericet-pose6104 Рік тому +2

      Who's paying for these weapons?

  • @aidancreager4095
    @aidancreager4095 Рік тому +41

    The more high tech weapons Ukraine receives the faster they can dispatch Russia

    • @shesathome
      @shesathome Рік тому +2

      The more weapons Ukr gets the richer is Zele and Co. And lesser is Ukr nation.

    • @robbietorkelsonn8509
      @robbietorkelsonn8509 Рік тому +2

      @@shesathome All the money eventually comes from America and stays in America

    • @Aravind-sh8uq
      @Aravind-sh8uq Рік тому

      😂😂😂😂
      Stop fooling

    • @angelcamacho2059
      @angelcamacho2059 Рік тому

      Russia have better weapons more advanced and powerful that the public don't know.

    • @TheisKrarupHansen
      @TheisKrarupHansen Рік тому

      @@angelcamacho2059 Right, so the Russian government has sacrificed close to 60.000 troops before they brought the real weapons? If that were true it would be pure insanity...

  • @NC.237
    @NC.237 Рік тому +28

    God bless America 🇺🇸

  • @orion3253
    @orion3253 Рік тому +13

    This might directly save lives.

  • @saarinmaki
    @saarinmaki Рік тому +3

    Norway already delivered nasams months ago. Great that the US as the much bigger country are buying more from Norway and sending to Ukraine. They need a steady replenishment of all kinds of weapons. Glory to the brave soldiers of Ukraine!

  • @beam3819
    @beam3819 Рік тому +32

    Very good news. This very time is critical to provide heawy defense systems. Saving lives in Ukraine and protecting infrasturcture need even more systems. Tx US/allies!

  • @appletree6741
    @appletree6741 Рік тому +83

    Congratulations 🎉 Ukraine, keep the modern weapons coming 🇩🇪❤️🇺🇦💪

    • @udayfluer3744
      @udayfluer3744 Рік тому +12

      @Alessandro Plomo stop saying that ukraine people wants war not peace. they want a peace after completion of war. ukraine people president itself said that they only do talk about peace once war ends one way or another.

    • @Djamonja
      @Djamonja Рік тому +10

      @Alessandro Plomo They have a right to defend their country. If you want peace, tell Russia to leave.

    • @unworthy42
      @unworthy42 Рік тому

      @Alessandro Plomo Rooting for Russia means your opinion isn't worth a squirt of piss. Ruck Fussia. : )

    • @joelbrooks3198
      @joelbrooks3198 Рік тому +1

      @@udayfluer3744 Russia will use tactical nuclear weapons.

    • @terrynewsome6698
      @terrynewsome6698 Рік тому +1

      @@joelbrooks3198 and we will nuke them. They want the apocalypse, they will get it

  • @JoeOnam
    @JoeOnam Рік тому +24

    These Surface to Air Missiles Systems are very sophisticated

    • @Rob-vv5yn
      @Rob-vv5yn Рік тому

      Very expensive missile verses a drone which is cheap, I can see the drone V missile cost being a very expensive exercise.

    • @norwegiangadgetman
      @norwegiangadgetman Рік тому +2

      @@Rob-vv5yn And letting a cheap drone past can be even more expensive.

    • @nigeljohnson9820
      @nigeljohnson9820 Рік тому +2

      @@Rob-vv5yn do you not know about defence in depth. There are other ways to deal with cheap drones.

    • @stephengilmore2741
      @stephengilmore2741 Рік тому

      No... really!? I could have sworn they just launched big rocks like trebuchets!! Thanks for the insight. I'd never have known.

    • @norwegiangadgetman
      @norwegiangadgetman Рік тому

      @@stephengilmore2741 Big rocks was part of the possible loadouts for NASAMS 1, together with HAWK, MISTRAL and RBS 70...

  • @thedirty530
    @thedirty530 Рік тому +49

    We got your back Ukraine! AS LONG AS IT TAKES!

    • @thomasbr83
      @thomasbr83 Рік тому +4

      Well it seems your able to pay for your food and dont worry about the bills so it seems.Whole europe is done with it

    • @IBTU
      @IBTU Рік тому +2

      You are? Then go fight let’s see how brave you really are😊

    • @jtothed8575
      @jtothed8575 Рік тому +2

      You rich or live in your mom’s basement and don’t have bills to worry about? Wait, I’ll guess, you are in college.. :)

    • @austria3530
      @austria3530 Рік тому +1

      @@fishlivesmatter we are fighting by sending weapons and equipment

    • @austria3530
      @austria3530 Рік тому

      @@miriamweller812 to the last russian also

  • @bell4textu973
    @bell4textu973 Рік тому +41

    Wondering if it`s Nasams-2 system Ukraine has received. In that case, it should not be possible for Russian missiles, fighter jets, etc. to pass Ukrainian high-value targets. Not possible for Russian to Jam this system, but the entire Ukraine needs more than 20, especially if attacs on Ukraine comes from Belarus as well.

    • @davidjones6389
      @davidjones6389 Рік тому +1

      When the next big push comes, both side will deploy aircraft, but only one side will win. This gives the Ukrainians an added advantage.

    • @beam3819
      @beam3819 Рік тому

      Enough burned down cities with civilians. Enough bombed out schools and hospitals. Now is the time to provide this defense systems

    • @Rob-vv5yn
      @Rob-vv5yn Рік тому +7

      @@davidjones6389 these missile systems are fixed ones and likely only to protect cities it’s not a system that will cover the front line, so it’s useful to protect places like Odessa, smaller cities close to the front it’s not suitable as you risk it being killed by artillery or captured which would be even worse. Like all missile systems aircraft can fly around them as they should be easily aware of there locations as soon as the radar is turned on and the Russians also have capable anti radiation missiles not sure the capabilities of this system to defend against those.

    • @davidjones6389
      @davidjones6389 Рік тому

      @@Rob-vv5yn thx

    • @bell4textu973
      @bell4textu973 Рік тому +1

      @@Rob-vv5yn There are 16 such systems, either underway or in Ukraine as we speak. I still do not think that is sufficiently. Nasams protects big cities, bridges and should also be able to destroy incomming (God forbid) nukes!

  • @thryce82
    @thryce82 Рік тому +15

    as for why this is good. we have a loooootttt of amrams and sidewinders so if there is minimal change in the missile we can scale this weapon rather easily and there should be active production lines in the states. thus not the greatest but we are giving them 16 of the systems and should be able to give them lots of munitions even if they arent the greatest.

  • @willw8011
    @willw8011 Рік тому +36

    These "experts" need to read the information about these systems, before going on camera. These systems can shoot down aircraft and cruise missiles, so it will protect Ukrainian cities from mostly cruise missiles. The USA sent 2 batteries and will send another 6 in the future for a total of 8 batteries. The other 6 still need to be manufactured.
    These systems use American radar and air to air missiles. The Norwegians made the fire control system, so these air to air missiles can be used for this ground to air system.
    Raytheon makes these in the USA with the Norwegian fire control components. Obviously, the USA is not going to buy the whole systems from Norway, especially when most of the system are US Radar and missiles. The Norwegian company also makes these in Norway with American components: radar and missiles. I read, the Norwegians also integrated some European made missiles into this system for European countries.

    • @norwegiangadgetman
      @norwegiangadgetman Рік тому +5

      In theory, the system can use almost any air-to-air and ground-to air missile. There's even a launcher for 'cheap' AIM9 SIDEWINDER missiles. Just the thing to shoot down drones with. And since it's a decentralized system, by the time the Orks detects the radar lock, they may have flown over the launchers, and should be preparing for a HE enema...
      I don't know where the finished systems are coming from, but the Ukrainian soldiers has been here in Norway to get the necessary training. And they learn fast!

    • @TB-zf7we
      @TB-zf7we Рік тому +2

      The control & radar system can integrate & command Germany's IRIS-T as well, as soon as they build it and ship to Ukraine.

    • @matthewbaynham6286
      @matthewbaynham6286 Рік тому

      So which parts are made in Britain again?

    • @tomjones7184
      @tomjones7184 Рік тому

      Yes general armchair 🫡

    • @madsiraver
      @madsiraver Рік тому +4

      @Wonderin'Aloud the name of the system is Norwegian Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System
      Sooo we are the brains u just got the majority of the components just sayin...

  • @slimguy94
    @slimguy94 Рік тому +1

    I just watched a pentagon briefing from today that says delivery is roughly 2 months away…

  • @kingofworld7234
    @kingofworld7234 Рік тому +1

    Wow so good Thanks

  • @thetoughcookie3665
    @thetoughcookie3665 Рік тому +75

    Big respect for USA. Support for Ukraine ❤

    • @dedyzee
      @dedyzee Рік тому +1

      It will destroy the city of Kiev

    • @gont183
      @gont183 Рік тому +4

      @@dedyzee NASAMS will?

    • @Aravind-sh8uq
      @Aravind-sh8uq Рік тому +5

      😂😂😂😂
      Not respect
      Big profits for america .for using Ukraine

    • @larrys4383
      @larrys4383 Рік тому

      @@Aravind-sh8uq bitter? The US is buying from Norway, so United States taxpayers are supporting Ukraine. The technology is US.

    • @juanblanco7594
      @juanblanco7594 Рік тому

      I didn't vote to help Ukraine. Looks as if American votes don't count, just like in Russia votes don't count.

  • @kenc9265
    @kenc9265 Рік тому +34

    I wish this type of air defense weapon would have been available to Ukraine earlier in the war and would have saved many lives and infrastructures. I hope in the future, Ukraine can integrate Swedish fighter jets Gripin into their defense arsenals to stop Putin bombing civilians

    • @corvanna4438
      @corvanna4438 Рік тому +2

      It takes training to learn to use systems like this.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 Рік тому +1

      Yes. The allies were very slow to arm the Ukrainians and much destruction and suffering has been caused as a result.

    • @3050Victus
      @3050Victus Рік тому +2

      @@daydays12 allies? WW vibes huh ?

    • @Leadfoot_P71
      @Leadfoot_P71 Рік тому

      It's Gripen not Grupin

    • @kenc9265
      @kenc9265 Рік тому

      @@Leadfoot_P71 😄 thanks for correction, or an F16 would also be nice. Ukrainian pilots are smart they can learn

  • @scottcates
    @scottcates Рік тому +16

    Ukraine will own the skies over their country.
    *🇺🇦 Glory to Ukraine and glory to the heroic Ukrainian soldiers*

  • @John-ed8ye
    @John-ed8ye Рік тому +31

    NASAMs is a basically a Norwegian fire control system and launchers plus US components such as a Raytheon Sentinel Radar, not a Norwegian system as claimed in the video and US missiles. NASAMS 3 the latest version adds support for AIM-9x, Extended Range AMRAAM, and the German IRIS-T and it will also add a new GhostEye medium range radar based on a system developed for the US Patriot air defense system. GhostEye would open up interoperability with the Patriot possibly leading to Patriots for protection of higher value targets such as Odessa and Kyiv. So it’s big news.

    • @norwegiangadgetman
      @norwegiangadgetman Рік тому +3

      The system is actually based on work done on the old NOAH system. And it already can interconnect with Patriot.
      They also use optics from Rheinmetal.
      Incidentally, they used a pair of NASAMS to protect Washington DC during the 2005 Presidential inauguration. Not certain why they didn't use a Patriot system?
      (The airspace over The Whitehouse is still protected by NASAMS)
      NASAMS 1 could also control RBS 70 manpads and L70 40mm cannons. Don't know if 2 and 3 can still do that.

    • @harleyquinn8202
      @harleyquinn8202 Рік тому +1

      Do Ukrainians know how to repair them if needed?

    • @John-ed8ye
      @John-ed8ye Рік тому +2

      @@harleyquinn8202 They of course have been undergoing training on how to operate and maintain the systems. The reason it took so long to get HIMARS was that they needed to have a sufficient number of troops trained before the US would release the weapons. It will take a while to become proficient but whatever training they receive will be superior to the dismal level of training and support the Russians provide to their troops.

    • @John-ed8ye
      @John-ed8ye Рік тому +1

      @@harleyquinn8202 They of course have been undergoing training on how to operate and maintain the systems. The reason it took so long to get HIMARS was that they needed to have a sufficient number of troops trained before the US would release the weapons. It will take a while to become proficient but whatever training they receive will be superior to the dismal level of training and support the Russians provide to their troops.

    • @bell4textu973
      @bell4textu973 Рік тому +1

      There is actually another systmem underway, called "Nasams Ghost-Eye". A supplementary successor to Nasam's 3

  • @Rascallucci
    @Rascallucci Рік тому +8

    This is what Ukraine has been waiting for. It will make a huge difference and will save so many lives especially civilians.

    • @stephengilmore2741
      @stephengilmore2741 Рік тому

      I'd disagree that it's "what Ukraine has been waiting for." What they're waiting for are modern Western fighters and MBTs.

    • @Rascallucci
      @Rascallucci Рік тому

      @@stephengilmore2741 Western fighters have always been a pipe dream. Even to date, the US has yet to mention fighters. If they can get tanks like the M1A2 is already a miracle. The Americans are kidding themselves, they are still trapped in a conversation amongst themselves on which weapon might upset Putin. Putin doesn't care, if he wants an excuse he will make up anything. Biden needs to do more. Is great that they can secure more monies, but the key thing is how do you plan to use that money that will be the difference maker.

  • @mdsazibulislam4765
    @mdsazibulislam4765 Рік тому +23

    Excellent , thanks to USA for supporting Ukrainian people

    • @fredmidtgaard5487
      @fredmidtgaard5487 Рік тому +6

      And Norway! Please!

    • @yohanessugiarto8620
      @yohanessugiarto8620 Рік тому +1

      Thank you Norway. One of the most beautiful countries on earth, and the home for many natural wonders more than we can count.

  • @towTruck42
    @towTruck42 Рік тому

    Commentator was like "so it's just a shield, it doesn't help you defeat your enemy?"

  • @leefox3834
    @leefox3834 Рік тому +1

    This decade has been crazy as we are still only in the 3rd year of it

  • @buddacafe
    @buddacafe Рік тому +8

    Several types of defense systems being sent to Ukraine from the US are free. This is because the manufacturers are testing their products.

    • @danielasare1165
      @danielasare1165 Рік тому +1

      Nothing sent to Ukraine has been free. When the F-15s and 16s saw their baptism of fire with the IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) during the israeli-arab wars, they were being tested in real world fights for the first time. Yet they had been paid for fully. It's the same with everything the US has sent to Ukraine except in this case, the bill is on the US government.

    • @1202burton
      @1202burton Рік тому

      If you learn just 1 thing in life, you would know nothing is "free".
      These things have been tested for years, what they are doing now would more resemble advertising.

    • @buddacafe
      @buddacafe Рік тому

      @@xlZENlx It's correct. Your referring to the bulk of the weapons funded by the dollars given by the US gov. No, there are so many companies all over the world doing freebies and get return data on results

  • @leewilson77
    @leewilson77 Рік тому +4

    Excellent interview! Slava Ukraini!

  • @richardvara8124
    @richardvara8124 Рік тому

    Yes!

  • @BLURTHEGHOST
    @BLURTHEGHOST Рік тому +17

    Norway to the rescue🦾

    • @Mr.Byrnes
      @Mr.Byrnes Рік тому +3

      USA and Norway! Let’s not keep our European tinted glasses on

  • @RuleofFive
    @RuleofFive Рік тому +29

    This makes Vlad sad! 😢

    • @xbandosx1
      @xbandosx1 Рік тому +1

      Probably makes him happy because he now knows that Ukraine is running out of superior S-300 systems so they had to replace them with inferior NASAMS... this is an actual fact.

    • @g6kid1
      @g6kid1 Рік тому

      @@xbandosx1 your such a trolling fanboy its pathetic, western arms are always far more superior than Russian junk

    • @ricardo3699
      @ricardo3699 Рік тому +5

      @@xbandosx1 ahahahaha

    • @davediamond7228
      @davediamond7228 Рік тому

      @@xbandosx1 and conversly, russia is running out of ground artillery' and are using their expensive s-400 systems in place of

  • @VegasVaron
    @VegasVaron Рік тому +22

    When Ukraine wins the war, Germany will have a lot of explaining as to why the sat in the sidelines while an autocrat attacked a democratic government. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦

    • @historian8214
      @historian8214 Рік тому +2

      France also.

    • @AdamBorseti
      @AdamBorseti Рік тому +1

      @@historian8214 yeah, but what do you expect from France?

    • @ghetiecosmin6197
      @ghetiecosmin6197 Рік тому

      Maybe Germanany change it's mind after first nuclear bomb explode în Ukraine

    • @corvanna4438
      @corvanna4438 Рік тому +3

      To be fair, Germany does not have much stocks to begin with, but they could provide financing for some of the systems.

    • @keshavacharyanp
      @keshavacharyanp Рік тому +2

      Why Germany need to explain???Germany is independent country not dicated by Ukraine which is fully dependent on west for survival.
      Despite Ukraine victory in social media ,it's highly unlikely they will claim victory in battlefield.

  • @JETWTF
    @JETWTF Рік тому +9

    He makes them out to be equal to S-300 Soviet era AA missiles. They are not, and not only able to resist jamming they all work as a single unit, the radar from one is used by all of them so 100 kilometers is not the actual radar capabilities of the system, just of 1 part of the system. A line of 10 of them in a row gives the ones on the ends a 1000 kilometer range along the row. If two are side by side 50 kilometers from each other and something is flying between them the system will pick which one should fire before the operators can even think about it. They are not what Russia and Ukraine have been used to making them simply resupply.

    • @12345fowler
      @12345fowler Рік тому

      This setup of having one central unit coordinating several missiles launch systems has economic advantages (reduction of cost) but also disadvanatges. Take out one central unit and you freeze the whole sytsem. Pro's and Con's.

    • @harleyquinn8202
      @harleyquinn8202 Рік тому

      And any Ukrainian with 80% IQ can operate them with zero training. That is how good those systems are.

    • @silentdeath7847
      @silentdeath7847 Рік тому +1

      @@12345fowler propably some redundancy buildt in for that event, if they can even get close enough to find and Engage it 😂

    • @Aqua.man045
      @Aqua.man045 Рік тому

      Anything that is electronic can be jammed. I am not buying that.

    • @JETWTF
      @JETWTF Рік тому

      @@Aqua.man045 Resist Jamming is not the same as immune to it. And they are defensive system rather than front line which narrows the frequencies that can be jammed due to the distance from the front lines. Signal strength degrades over distance with varying degrees of degradation depending on the frequency. They don't use one frequency range like old tech did and consumer devices do, they use multiple. When one is jammed they will switch to another until they find one that is not being jammed or hit the lack of immunity and then work as solo units. Resistant is not immune.

  • @Argosh
    @Argosh Рік тому

    Apparently weapons first put in service almost a quarter century ago are "the most modern"...

  • @johnnytyler5685
    @johnnytyler5685 Рік тому +42

    These systems will likely never be used anywhere CLOSE to the frontlines. The purpose of these systems is to stop the indiscriminate cruise missile attacks on civilians in cities like Kyiv and Odesa (and in that respect, Ukraine needed them about six months ago). I'm sure everyone has seen the latest terrorist attacks on Odesa using Iranian suicide drones. Those are literally the EXACT kind of attacks that NASAMS is being sent to Ukraine to stop.
    These are very short-range systems (relatively speaking and compared to something like a Patriot battery) and will almost certainly never have the opportunity to shoot down a Russian fighter jet or helicopter. Although considering how incompetent the Russians are, maybe one of their drunken pilots will get lost and accidentally end up flying towards Kyiv and will somehow manage to get close enough to be shot down with NASAMS...but I doubt it.
    These will be used by Ukraine exactly how we use them here in the USA. NASAMS batteries are set up around the White House and other sensitive areas in DC to protect the White House and Capitol building from airborne attacks. Whether that be an airplane or drones. That is what Ukraine will do with them. They will be set up around Kyiv and Odesa...perhaps eventually around a city like Kharkiv...and will be used to shoot down incoming cruise missiles and Russian/Iranian drones in order to protect those cities from future attacks.

    • @xbandosx1
      @xbandosx1 Рік тому

      the S-300 systems that Ukraine already has are far superior.

    • @madsiraver
      @madsiraver Рік тому +1

      @@xbandosx1 lol , do know how many s300 and s400 RU has lost?

    • @dixonpinfold2582
      @dixonpinfold2582 Рік тому

      Splendidly clear. Thanks.

    • @johnnytyler5685
      @johnnytyler5685 Рік тому +4

      @@xbandosx1 You don't seem to understand the logistics of this war. The S300 may have a longer RANGE than NASAMS does, but IDK what else would make it "far superior". And having a debate about which system is "superior" is literally meaningless. Why? Because Ukraine DOES NOT HAVE THE AMMO to keep S300 batteries operational for the rest of this conflict.
      That is EXACTLY why NASAMS is being sent. If Ukraine is forced to keep shooting down tiny little drones with huge S300 AA missiles, they are going to run out very quickly. They are likely on the brink of running out as we speak. That is the main reasons NASAMS is being sent to Ukraine. It has nothing to do with "capability" compared to the S300. They are being sent because NATO can continue to supply Ukraine with the AMRAAMs that are fired by NASAMS pretty much forever. There are no huge stockpiles of Soviet-era S300 missiles available for Ukraine to replenish their stocks, and once they run out, Russia can hit these cities with cruise missiles and drones non-stop without Ukraine being able to stop them.

    • @xbandosx1
      @xbandosx1 Рік тому

      @@johnnytyler5685 i agree with you to why US had to send NASAMS, but a lot of people then say that they are an upgrade to what Ukraine had before which is not the case.

  • @chloemaxwell2628
    @chloemaxwell2628 Рік тому +19

    Go Ukraine!

    • @santka3739
      @santka3739 Рік тому

      Thank you! 🇺🇦✊💪✌️

  • @trotskyite1
    @trotskyite1 Рік тому

    That first picture is a himars and also this anti air system has not yet been delivered

  • @bangscutter
    @bangscutter Рік тому

    Please check your images in the video. Misleading to show HIMARS in the video when you're talking about NASAMS.

  • @lordbyron3603
    @lordbyron3603 Рік тому +13

    Keep these coming ! Thank you USA🙏🙏🙏🙏 ! Glory to Ukraine !! 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

  • @johanbee8757
    @johanbee8757 Рік тому +4

    Not enough, other country should realize how important this war is. The ammount of weaponry they sent is laughable, tax payer should be ashame of themself. Send more weapon to Ukraine . Slava Ukraine 👍.

  • @jonathanforcelledo9700
    @jonathanforcelledo9700 Рік тому

    how many have been shipped?

  • @KingLutherQ
    @KingLutherQ Рік тому +3

    AMRAAMs have a 99% kill rate. So, Igor, are you feeling lucky? Make my day!

  • @augustoliver2779
    @augustoliver2779 Рік тому +7

    We should hold referendums in Russia asking if they would like to be annexed by an EU country. Lol 😂

  • @aloh5613
    @aloh5613 Рік тому +6

    Excellent... 😏
    (Mr Burns)

    • @Zsis-bj1bq
      @Zsis-bj1bq Рік тому

      Что отлично, конец света, или что?

  • @paulbailey7641
    @paulbailey7641 Рік тому +2

    I think the Germans should help pay as they haven’t spent much yet.

  • @irynasarokina3109
    @irynasarokina3109 Рік тому +9

    👍👍👍

  • @aztronomy7457
    @aztronomy7457 Рік тому +9

    Come on Germany. Give them some Leopards. Stop being soft.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 Рік тому +1

      All the military experts on you tube say Leopards are great. What's stopping the Germans?

    • @redgsf
      @redgsf Рік тому

      ​@@daydays12 our reluctant government ... it is a shame.

  • @danwylie-sears1134
    @danwylie-sears1134 Рік тому +4

    Does Russia have enough munitions that can actually hit a target, to spend it on factories, command centers, and ammo dumps? Or do they need it all for their top priorities, like maternity hospitals?

    • @hicm1of124
      @hicm1of124 Рік тому

      Keep watching CNN, and drinking the Kool Aid! 😉😉

  • @joaquinandres8142
    @joaquinandres8142 Рік тому

    Looks like the "starving Marvin" episode of South park, when they show the weapons they need to chase them.

  • @geraldlevin5141
    @geraldlevin5141 Рік тому +2

    No Russian veto in United Nations General Assembly (UN GA). So, a UN GA motion to revoke Russia's veto in UN Security Council is practical?🙃

  • @abu-omaral-bakr392
    @abu-omaral-bakr392 Рік тому +39

    I can wait until they take Mariupol back

    • @janusz-kowalski
      @janusz-kowalski Рік тому +1

      Mariupol being occupied by nazist-banderites 2014-2022.

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 Рік тому

      Do you mean can or can't?

    • @abu-omaral-bakr392
      @abu-omaral-bakr392 Рік тому

      @@daydays12 can’t

    • @abu-omaral-bakr392
      @abu-omaral-bakr392 Рік тому +2

      @@janusz-kowalski no what are you talking about. The only nasis are Russia for not accepting Ukrainans as an one heritage

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 Рік тому

      @@abu-omaral-bakr392 Thank you. Yes. It will be a great day.... but I am afraid horrible things , apart from the destruction, after the liberation ....will be found

  • @JohnnyD45
    @JohnnyD45 Рік тому +5

    🇺🇸💪🏻🇺🇦 Only the best weapons for Ukraine !!! Victory to Ukraine!!!

    • @rogermas6087
      @rogermas6087 Рік тому

      the Norwegian-developed air defense system NASAMS, 100% hit-proof in Ukraine.

  • @unoriginalname4321
    @unoriginalname4321 Рік тому +1

    F-ing finally! Now ship them 100's of C-RAMs too

  • @juststuff8128
    @juststuff8128 Рік тому +1

    This seems like good news

  • @murraymadness4674
    @murraymadness4674 Рік тому +5

    My opinion is Ukraine needs to move to air superiority next. With winter coming, the fight is going to be in the air. They have not used many of their jets or pilots.
    The USA can probably help them quite a lot by taking out all the Ruzzian anti-aircraft systems and air strips, etc.

    • @hicm1of124
      @hicm1of124 Рік тому

      That's because nearly all of their jets have been destroyed, and the vast majority of Ukraine's pilots either killed; captured, or have deserted!

    • @murraymadness4674
      @murraymadness4674 Рік тому +1

      @@hicm1of124 do you earn 2 or 3 rubles for each of your posts?

    • @andriikharechko9300
      @andriikharechko9300 Рік тому

      @@hicm1of124 the majority?:) Hmm, very funny, because I see them flying in the sky every day and many times during the day here.

    • @stephengilmore2741
      @stephengilmore2741 Рік тому

      I'm afraid they simply do not have enough jets, nor are their jets advanced enough to achieve air superiority. Furthermore there would need to be a huge SEAD campaign along the frontline - something which they cannot do without new aircraft. MiG-29s with AGM-88s aren't enough, especially given their limited implementation.
      What Ukraine needs are F-16s. That is their only chance for air dominance.

    • @eotlati1763
      @eotlati1763 Рік тому

      If you do that russia will respond and take out US ones too.

  • @Digmen1
    @Digmen1 Рік тому +4

    They have to deploy US weapons as Germany only sends a few.
    Come on Germany, send more Gephards, PZhaubitzers, and yes all those Leopards!

    • @LordDucarius
      @LordDucarius Рік тому +1

      From where? Do you think its still 1942? Germany has no tanks and if they are needed at home and not in ukraine

    • @Digmen1
      @Digmen1 Рік тому

      @@LordDucarius We all know that Germanys' tanks were amongst the best, but they have been run down.
      But they have had 6 months to get them up and running. And why do they need them at home, do you think Denmark or Switzerland will invade Germany?

    • @Vatnik_tschistilka
      @Vatnik_tschistilka Рік тому

      They sent the last 6 Gepards there were in stocks last week bringing the number to 30. That's all there were. There is also gonna be 50 Dingo MRAP and a few more MARS2 MLRS and PZH2000 sent to Ukraine along with the IRIS-T batteries, but aside of those there is only basically a couple of dozen Leopard1 and Marder standing around somewhere. So unless the government decides to hand over tanks and IFVs Germany is basically done with equipment. The Leopard1 and Marder is essentially all there is still left.

  • @RPRIMICI
    @RPRIMICI Рік тому

    Is this system meant to counter the kamikaze drones from Iran? Kinda like using a sledgehammer to swat a fly...? More C-RAMS for the drones are probably best or some kind of jamming equipment to disable drone's navigation.

  • @franciscograsso5029
    @franciscograsso5029 Рік тому

    WESTMINSTER BRIDGE nice place

  • @garrykimovich
    @garrykimovich Рік тому +8

    What would the world be without the USA? It's scary to imagine it.

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 Рік тому +4

      Germany needs to get on board.

    • @V0ID_beats
      @V0ID_beats Рік тому +3

      yeah people keep hating on USA which i understand but there are only FAR worse options

    • @oldskoolordie
      @oldskoolordie Рік тому

      Free?

    • @dixonpinfold2582
      @dixonpinfold2582 Рік тому

      Billions of people would be plunged into tyranny within a generation. It's that simple.

  • @mri3384
    @mri3384 Рік тому +11

    Never ending? 16 HIMARs nearly finished Rossia.

    • @schmobot
      @schmobot Рік тому +3

      Oh hi Mars, you're my favorite planet

    • @boink800
      @boink800 Рік тому

      Ok, Putin HIMARS troll ... do not cry too much.

  • @Beinhartwie1chopper
    @Beinhartwie1chopper Рік тому +1

    How can one stubborn man create so much suffering?

  • @mwb3783
    @mwb3783 Рік тому +1

    The German IRIS-T System will come in some days.

  • @smoozerish
    @smoozerish Рік тому +8

    Just shows that the US military complex was right. Look at how weak Germany is in comparison

    • @thomasbr83
      @thomasbr83 Рік тому

      The USA is always the one who creates chaos in other countries and so they know how to build up a arsenal.Germany is like japan and never wants to be included in any wars learn your history.And the USA would suffer also in a war because there logistic has suffered major budget cuts.....

    • @OllyKilo
      @OllyKilo Рік тому

      Germany were kinda being eyed with suspicion over the last 80 years or so.

    • @mutkaluikkunen3926
      @mutkaluikkunen3926 Рік тому +1

      well, tbh Germany is weak because the allies and they partially themselves wanted it that way after the WW 2. That's however going to change in the upcoming years.

  • @peterprentice9179
    @peterprentice9179 Рік тому +3

    fantastic news . . .

  • @DarkstarDarth
    @DarkstarDarth Рік тому

    A few minutes man 3's would be refreshing.

  • @mkchan4978
    @mkchan4978 Рік тому

    So what happen to HIMARS?

  • @dw1208
    @dw1208 Рік тому +11

    Sounds like a good bit of kit.🇺🇦✊

  • @fishheadbreakroom
    @fishheadbreakroom Рік тому +57

    Come on Germany, please join in supporting with the heavy weapons

    • @Info-Ark
      @Info-Ark Рік тому +6

      I thought Germany gave them 100 helmets with spikes on ??

    • @Zsis-bj1bq
      @Zsis-bj1bq Рік тому

      Как Вы не поймёте, что без России весь мир будет уничтожен, начнется эпоха под названием, до нашей эры, наша эпоха закончится.

    • @nenasiek
      @nenasiek Рік тому

      Scholtz is an indicisive coward, he wants to hide in the crowd of other large countries donating heavy weapons

    • @MacDaddy8200
      @MacDaddy8200 Рік тому +4

      It would be great with Leopard 2 tanks and Marder IFV. But lets not forget they already delivered PZH2000 and Gepard and are supplying their newest AA system IRIS-T, i dont see France, Spain or Italy supplying their heavy weapons.

    • @blehblehbleh86
      @blehblehbleh86 Рік тому +17

      @@Info-Ark To be fair Germany is 3rd for giving military aid - they're definitely pulling their weight, not to mention all the help they've given Ukrainians who've fled to Germany.

  • @Ethan-um7cp
    @Ethan-um7cp Рік тому

    What is the source confirming delivery of NASAMS? I see no evidence of this .

  • @sjjsjsjxjcjcdhddh
    @sjjsjsjxjcjcdhddh Рік тому

    Wow😊

  • @levikvarsnes7322
    @levikvarsnes7322 Рік тому +18

    Why do everyone keep calling NASAMS for an US air defense system, when its literally called Norwegian Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System.

    • @michaeltichonuk2176
      @michaeltichonuk2176 Рік тому +4

      Good question. It was a joint effort I think I heard them say. As long as Ukraine receives them.i don't care who or what they call them, eh? 😁.
      Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 ♥️!
      Glory to the Heros!
      Germany should start booting those pro ruzzian people out before little green men start arriving...

    • @bills6093
      @bills6093 Рік тому +13

      It is built partly by Raytheon, and the USA supplied the systems to Ukraine.

    • @danLTa1
      @danLTa1 Рік тому +7

      American missiles and radar tech.

    • @DOI_ARTS
      @DOI_ARTS Рік тому +5

      Norway made it but USA financed it

    • @davidsmith8997
      @davidsmith8997 Рік тому +5

      Why isn't Norway donating them instead of making the US pay for them?

  • @carlberg7503
    @carlberg7503 Рік тому +6

    When is Germany going to start sending Ukraine the weapons its needs?

    • @The_Stef
      @The_Stef Рік тому +3

      Do you know what they delivered so far before you posted?

    • @The_Stef
      @The_Stef Рік тому +5

      At this point I'm just gonna copy paste the same text I posted many times, so far they have delivered:
      30 Gepard tanks with 53'000 rounds of 35mm ammunition,
      3 MARS vehicles, (+2 more to be delivered this year) = 5
      10 PZH 2000 with 10'500 artillery rounds (+10 more to be delivered this year) = 20
      900 Panzerfauts 3,
      Smart 155 and Volcano Ammunition (ammount undisclosed),
      500 stingers,
      54 AFVs (M113) from Danish stock overhauled with German funds,
      14900 DM31 And PARM DM22 Anti-Tank Mines,
      8000 RGW 90 Matador RPGs,
      100'000 handgranades,
      14 Anti-Drone Sensors And Jammers,
      8 Ground Surveillance Radars
      on other stuff..
      You don't think Ukraine needs or wants this stuff?

    • @lv3609
      @lv3609 Рік тому +2

      @@The_Stef
      It’s good you’re posting the info 👍

    • @yohanessugiarto8620
      @yohanessugiarto8620 Рік тому +3

      Germany also plans to deliver two IRIS-T air defense systems to Ukraine by the end of this year, and two more in early 2023.

    • @carlberg7503
      @carlberg7503 Рік тому +1

      @@The_Stef The information I have differs from the information you posted. I sincerely hope you're right and I'm wrong.

  • @donaldjonesgonzalez2761
    @donaldjonesgonzalez2761 Рік тому +1

    ALL APPROVED;

  • @jamil6880
    @jamil6880 Рік тому

    Megaman is the best weapon.

  • @Baleur
    @Baleur Рік тому +4

    Same thing as with the NLAW's, which are swedish AT-weapons, but all of the media says "US weapon systems".
    No bro, its scandinavian tech.

    • @petersouthernboy6327
      @petersouthernboy6327 Рік тому +2

      The missiles are US - its a joint Norwegian/US system.

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 Рік тому +1

      @@petersouthernboy6327 The radar is also US. The fire system is from Norway. Doesn't matter as long as it kills Russians.

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 Рік тому +1

      I think they mean the US is paying for it and actually sending it

    • @falloutboyisitachi
      @falloutboyisitachi Рік тому

      That's only because the Javelin's won the branding war, every manpad is a Javelin just like how every smartphone is an iPhone.

  • @gheorghefalcaru
    @gheorghefalcaru Рік тому +10

    LONG LIVE THE NASAMS

  • @gasparoraimondi5259
    @gasparoraimondi5259 Рік тому

    Can this system shoot down hypersonic missiles?

  • @arlypaulmigueldamuy5221
    @arlypaulmigueldamuy5221 Рік тому +1

    He's not crediting the U.S. for the NASAMs. Typical Brit.

  • @atklm1
    @atklm1 Рік тому +3

    "Ukrainians need a never-ending supply of new weapons to keep them in the fight" That shall be provided of course, peoples of democracies have strong support for Ukraine, and leaders will follow that will. But I think it would be better if Ukraine gets soon-ending supply of weapons, that would lead this war to a victory in 2022. There would be a lot less casualties, lost or damaged material, less destruction, less burden for environment and would also come in the end a whole lot cheaper.

    • @-NEH-
      @-NEH- Рік тому

      So you would let the orcs do their thing and wipe Ukraine/ukranians off this planet?

    • @atklm1
      @atklm1 Рік тому +1

      @@-NEH- I would let the Ukrainians take their land back from the orcs with much more and much heavier and modern weaponry.

    • @-NEH-
      @-NEH- Рік тому +1

      @@atklm1 I see. But you also have to understand that everybody are doing their best not to give the orcs an excuse to use their nuclear weapon. Or at least Ukraine has to be prepared for a defence first. Like for example this weapon.

    • @atklm1
      @atklm1 Рік тому

      @@-NEH- What would Russia possibly gain by using nuclear weapon? Let's say they use a limited strike in Ukraine with tactical nuke. What do they gain? Nothing. What will they lose? All hope of any support of non-aligned countries, From China to India to some African and latin American states. The west would retaliate in some way, if not with nukes, then with air raids to Crimea, making it ready for Ukraine to just pick it up. If they use even small nuke in NATO area, there will be many retaliatory targets in Russia, and the entire NATO will take the skies over Moscow in no time, ready to strike the capital at any moment in case there's more of nuclear strike. And the NATO would use conventional army to take over every nuclear bases and annex the whole Russia.

    • @exentr
      @exentr Рік тому

      Speng BIG on weapons for Ukraine. Russia will pay war compensation. It will put Russia is artifical respiration for centuries.

  • @dubtube6691
    @dubtube6691 Рік тому +4

    🇺🇦💪✌️

  • @ProductofNZ
    @ProductofNZ Рік тому

    Phil is my favourite news presenter.

  • @Whatisthisstupidfinghandle
    @Whatisthisstupidfinghandle Рік тому +2

    They need a 50 of these. Not 2. Ukraine area is 680,000 square kilometres. A dozen would be a bare minimum. The plan is to send 6

    • @Rob-vv5yn
      @Rob-vv5yn Рік тому +1

      Check the price out and the US doesn’t have many to give away, however the Chinese must be watching closely, when the US is weakened and low on ammo they will have a mission in Taiwan that will be starting to temp them. That’s my worry.

  • @coachking5208
    @coachking5208 Рік тому +5

    Military industrial complex must love this!

    • @therealistintheboot8822
      @therealistintheboot8822 Рік тому +1

      Good for them.

    • @davediamond7228
      @davediamond7228 Рік тому

      trump's stock in Raytheon is doing great... closed at 81.00 today

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 Рік тому +2

      Not only them but all the people who believe in freedom too

    • @larrys4383
      @larrys4383 Рік тому

      Buy stock and profit from Putin’s aggression, if you are so concerned.

    • @dixonpinfold2582
      @dixonpinfold2582 Рік тому +1

      What a childish comment. Without weapons makers we'd be defenceless.

  • @johnfrancisco1851
    @johnfrancisco1851 Рік тому +3

    Slava Ukraine ki ll all Russian soldiers we ❤you stay safe

  • @ThatMemoryIsAlive
    @ThatMemoryIsAlive Рік тому

    If you listen carefully, the guest said the exact same answer for all the questions, albeit paraphrased

  • @nickduplaga507
    @nickduplaga507 Рік тому

    I hope helicopters have laser anti-missile. That could destroy everything including optical. Replace chaff, and flares.

  • @nova_verse6284
    @nova_verse6284 Рік тому +9

    Sometimes i get the feeling that Americans giving their weapons for testing and demonstration purposes on the effectiveness of their weapon systems.

    • @jdocean1
      @jdocean1 Рік тому +15

      It’s definitely a side benefit. Certainly not the primary reason but we’ll take it.

    • @mutkaluikkunen3926
      @mutkaluikkunen3926 Рік тому +9

      What if they did? Ukraine's reaping the benefits no matter what the motivation is.

    • @scotthenderson292
      @scotthenderson292 Рік тому +4

      Good publicity. Lots of countries have Russian/Soviet weapons. If they can see how good the US tech is while simultaneously giving the Russian gear away to Ukraine, they can profit from good publicity and newer weaponry. I bet India is paying close attention. Their military has a lot of older Soviet equipment. They might be drawn to US tech more. Especially since China is pro Russia.

    • @viperguyz
      @viperguyz Рік тому

      You really think America will give billions and billions of dollars to Ukraine for a war that’s not their. America is currently fighting Russia without fighting them. America is only benefiting itself.

    • @usul573
      @usul573 Рік тому

      Let's just say everyone is watching very closely. Washington is the biggest arms dealer in the world and it's not even close. Another $15 billion worth of arms sales approved just the other month.

  • @endrefidje5698
    @endrefidje5698 Рік тому +3

    I do hope the Western Alliance are also working on helping the Ukrainians with developing their own military equipment industry so they can produce more of the required material for their own forces. "Stugna-P anti tank", Neptune missiles,etc are made in Ukraine so expanding on their current capabilities would be good to help build up their forces and prevent future conflicts when peace is restored.

    • @julianbrelsford
      @julianbrelsford Рік тому

      Right now Ukraine has the advantage of not having expensive factories they depend upon being hit by missile strikes, as the weapons Ukraine is using come from foreign factories. For the time being I think that makes perfect sense.

  • @louisleprince5573
    @louisleprince5573 Рік тому

    Wrong. They have not received the NASAMS. Perhaps next week...

  • @tobiwan001
    @tobiwan001 Рік тому

    AMRAAM missiles are pretty antiquated as a platform, but a lot more advanced than anything in Russia

  • @israeldna3720
    @israeldna3720 Рік тому +6

    It's like a total different reality on UA-cam information with the Ukraine conflict vs TikTok information on the same thing. Crazy . The media have not reported well . I'm still waiting for a update on Odessa. Russia launched the Iranian drones and lit the place up . Two days ago.

    • @johnpablo2772
      @johnpablo2772 Рік тому

      UA-cam only show Russia losts boosting the morale for Ukraine
      TikTok is less censored it shows BOTH sides

    • @-p2349
      @-p2349 Рік тому

      @@johnpablo2772 TikTok is chinese spyware

    • @daydays12
      @daydays12 Рік тому

      Yes - the Iranian drones are very dangerous

    • @falloutboyisitachi
      @falloutboyisitachi Рік тому

      Imagine getting your news from TikTok.

    • @israeldna3720
      @israeldna3720 Рік тому

      @@falloutboyisitachi 😂. You realize a lot of the footage of the Ukraine conflict are on TikTok days before western media shows a edited version.

  • @CC-my2ex
    @CC-my2ex Рік тому +3

    VIVA President Zelenskyy he is a HERO!!
    Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦🇪🇺🇺🇦🇪🇺🇺🇦..
    Glory to the BRAVE HEROES 🇺🇦🇪🇺🇺🇦🇪🇺🇺🇦.
    Ukraine will win this war!!

  • @roblovestar9159
    @roblovestar9159 Рік тому +2

    Can these NASAMs counter Iranian drones?!!!

    • @tomnguyen9931
      @tomnguyen9931 Рік тому

      They can but they also have cheaper weapons to take that on then this weapon system.

  • @aronhayse9895
    @aronhayse9895 Рік тому

    i don't think nasams has been delivered yet

  • @panosxgrx5117
    @panosxgrx5117 Рік тому +3

    iron dome from israel

  • @adj3503
    @adj3503 Рік тому +19

    People here post all type of comments of joy without realizing that the rate of escalation of this conflict is incredibly worrisome and with possible catastrophic global consequences.

    • @mohamedsheriff5479
      @mohamedsheriff5479 Рік тому

      More Russia! Any kind of way Putin look at it, he will fail.

    • @albo181
      @albo181 Рік тому +10

      I think most people are aware of the dangers, we're just sick of hearing about it.

    • @raybon7939
      @raybon7939 Рік тому

      You correct this lunatic is risking the well being of 3 billion or more people cuase there will come a point where we will get involved.

    • @raybon7939
      @raybon7939 Рік тому

      The reality
      of industrial ware fare is beg to set in for all around the world and now...including for Putin
      And that is we can comfortably
      fight a proxy....
      industrial war for 200 300 400 months... if necessary
      and plenty ... more after that....
      With 1 percent of our economy infinite borrowing against our economy...and boundless endless....raw..materials for war....
      So the boy better sit down and a political way out ...

    • @NYJGreatness
      @NYJGreatness Рік тому

      That's up to the clown in Moscow. I'm not sure if he is ready to see his kid(s) die.

  • @paulblichmann2791
    @paulblichmann2791 Рік тому

    What's the range... because you're not going to be able to move it!

    • @corvanna4438
      @corvanna4438 Рік тому

      40 miles or so, but the systems are mobile and can network.

  • @myhoose90
    @myhoose90 Рік тому

    Is this not the game changer we here about but never materializes?.....or will that status be reserved for when we have nothing left to send but catapults?