How powerful is NASAMS Air Defence System

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2023
  • NASAMS or National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System is the world’s first network-centric short- to medium-range ground-based air defense system. It features numerous simultaneous engagements and Beyond Visual Range capabilities that are tightly integrated and tailored to a nation’s Integrated Air and Missile Defense. NASAMS network widens the protected area and improves the armed forces’ overall combat capacity. It has been evolving continuously since its inception in Norway.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 139

  • @TheLiamster
    @TheLiamster Рік тому +35

    The US has one of these protecting the prohibited airspace around Washington DC

    • @wp2746
      @wp2746 Рік тому +3

      Since 2005 I believe

    • @guillaumelalonde7945
      @guillaumelalonde7945 Рік тому

      There's actually quite a few of the launchers, you can find them on Google earth

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      Maybe 1 FDC with several batteries attached to it

    • @SeeLasSee
      @SeeLasSee 2 місяці тому

      3 systems

  • @CbrBlackblade
    @CbrBlackblade Рік тому +33

    NASAMS or Norwegian Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System.. not National ;P

    • @okklidokkli
      @okklidokkli 9 місяців тому +2

      It is called national in the US.

    • @Oeystein
      @Oeystein 8 місяців тому +3

      Norway designed NASAMS, but only has 3 systems plus one for NATO. And Norway does not have a long-distance system. But Norway gives away a lot, and has little itself, for political reasons. Incompetent politicians!

    • @matthewhuszarik4173
      @matthewhuszarik4173 Місяць тому +1

      Kongsberg’s web site calls it the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System. So I believe you are mistaken.
      The system was developed by Kronsberg and Raytheon so it is a joint venture between a Norwegian and US company.
      Still a great system both companies should be proud of.

    • @xrsuperduper7660
      @xrsuperduper7660 23 дні тому

      @@matthewhuszarik4173 Kongsberg. But you are 100% correct.

    • @matthewhuszarik4173
      @matthewhuszarik4173 22 дні тому

      @@xrsuperduper7660 Sorry for the typo.

  • @rice517
    @rice517 Рік тому +11

    Norway 🇸🇯

  • @torrust
    @torrust 8 місяців тому +5

    My biggest worry when being in infantry, was to have sufficient air-defense, need high mobility. NASAMS is a great upgrade over the old in-mobile systems.

  • @laernulienlaernulienlaernu8953

    I like the fact that you can load it with different missiles depending on the target. 😎

  • @IamArnel
    @IamArnel Місяць тому +1

    Wishing the Philippines would build its own Defense/Offense Shield using NASAMS.
    Its awesome!

  • @williamjohn4984
    @williamjohn4984 Рік тому +17

    One of the most important things for future and current wars is to make these long range anti air systems way more mobile. Won't be easy of course but it is super necessary

    • @bekeneel
      @bekeneel Рік тому

      Mhmm I thought they'd been for a long time? Be it patriot, s300 etc i only know of mobile systems.

    • @damascus1111
      @damascus1111 Рік тому +1

      @@bekeneelPerhaps they meant fire on the move systems or even just more portable systems

    • @SeeLasSee
      @SeeLasSee 2 місяці тому +3

      This system uses missiles designed for US/western fighter jets. So the same missiles already are theoretically on flying platforms.

  • @lurven6666
    @lurven6666 Рік тому +7

    Is it just me or did they forget the name of this system is "Norwegian advanced surface to air missile system"? Not "national".. Seems like a really dumb thing to miss when you make a video about something..

    • @feonor26
      @feonor26 11 місяців тому

      Kongsberg calls it National on their website, but both names are used

    • @lurven6666
      @lurven6666 11 місяців тому +1

      @@feonor26 Oh, my bad then :)

    • @feonor26
      @feonor26 11 місяців тому +1

      @@lurven6666 No worries, had to google it myself;)

  • @ricardo3760
    @ricardo3760 Рік тому +4

    Just to be that guy: it's Norwegian advanced surface to air missile system, not national..

    • @Military-TV
      @Military-TV  Рік тому

      Please read here kongsberg.com/kda/what-we-do/defence-and-security/integrated-air-and-missile-defence/nasams-air-defence-system/

    • @feonor26
      @feonor26 11 місяців тому

      Kongsberg calls it National on their website, but both names are used

  • @a2blimitless370
    @a2blimitless370 Рік тому +6

    Someone swallowed a buzz word sheet.

  • @waleedali9393
    @waleedali9393 Рік тому +4

    @ Military tv thank you so much it wonderful report and video good job and yes nasams is the best of the best air defence ever we use it also in the royal Jordanian army 🇯🇴

  • @fikartebek7331
    @fikartebek7331 9 місяців тому

    Indonesia uses this too

  • @patkilger9141
    @patkilger9141 Рік тому +5

    Well done!!

  • @fastsheep3964
    @fastsheep3964 Рік тому +9

    Norwegian shield 🛡️

    • @googleuservideotube
      @googleuservideotube 10 місяців тому +3

      Дуже допомагає нам виживати в Україні

  • @Ryan_Revier
    @Ryan_Revier Рік тому

    Even patriot is still uses in Japan, Taiwan and South Korea with added THAAD battery too in South Korea.

  • @aldocamerati983
    @aldocamerati983 Рік тому +4

    And Chilean Army and air forcé have the Nasams II thank.

    • @Castillo525
      @Castillo525 8 днів тому +1

      4 active, 8 to be delivered.

  • @drgonzo305
    @drgonzo305 6 місяців тому

    I wonder if they’ll switch these to the Aim-260 when it hits stores?

    • @SeeLasSee
      @SeeLasSee 2 місяці тому

      Possibly, since it’s smaller I believe. Though the radar may limit the range where it’s precise without additional radars networked together.

  • @HideeyeeL
    @HideeyeeL Рік тому +1

    6:26 What do you mean by *"Unnamed"* country 🤔

  • @user-ee6sc6zy9o
    @user-ee6sc6zy9o Рік тому

    how is it the first network based AA if the iron dome has been doing it since 2013?

    • @zupran
      @zupran Рік тому +4

      Nasams was developed in the 90's.

  • @BlueRice
    @BlueRice Рік тому +7

    Should add a few patriot air defense with it. Having patriot system will help cover unexpected target location coverage. Since it used Raytheon Rader system, it could network all together.

    • @targetaps
      @targetaps Рік тому +5

      They literally said it does just that.

    • @MrChickennugget360
      @MrChickennugget360 Рік тому

      the final picture shows an integrated air defense system that includes Patriot (i think block 2)

    • @-NOCAP-
      @-NOCAP- Рік тому

      Did you even watch the video?

    • @bekeneel
      @bekeneel Рік тому

      Yes they can put this in 1 connected network I believe & Patriot has the more powerful/longer range radar. I wonder tho if Nasams is also fit to intercdept ballistic rockets.

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      @@bekeneel Yeah they use LINK 16 which is a datalink for ground and sea air defence, fighters, attack aircraft and dedicated surveillance aircraft

  • @beidorion
    @beidorion 9 місяців тому

    then combine the system with a mobile skyranger for loiter munition protection of the systems at a low cost and use the missiles for larger targets.
    i wish my country would buy stuff like this, but sadly we are always ten years behind our needs.

  • @TheSuperedogg
    @TheSuperedogg Рік тому +1

    How fast is the reload? That’s important .

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      To reload a full 6 canister unit, it would probably take 20-30 mins, you will not be able to reload the launched canisters while other canisters in the same unit are being fired, luckily there are 3-4 units per battery

    • @TheSuperedogg
      @TheSuperedogg 11 місяців тому +1

      @@gibbo_303 ah I see, so a total of like 24- 36 intercept shots in a single battery? Which takes 20-30 mins after a massive attack to reload?

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      @@TheSuperedogg 18-24 missiles per battery, that is 3-4 launching units so it would take atleast 40 minutes but probably more like 60 or possibly 80 to reload a whole battery

  • @rajaklina
    @rajaklina 4 місяці тому

    Good for Malaysia air military now find middle defence air missille

  • @jaimeg9700
    @jaimeg9700 Рік тому

    put small arms nuclear missile in apace the missile will hold 3 to 4 small arm missile on body of the missile can released to destroy multiple targets

  • @krispayne729
    @krispayne729 7 місяців тому

    I wonder if that 1 on name country would happen to be Canada. Because a Canadian military has been looking at maybe buying a surface air missile system.

    • @ThSkBj
      @ThSkBj 5 місяців тому +1

      I'm thinking maybe Taiwan. They're facing an overhanging threat from China, and even mentioning Taiwan is like opening a can of worms. Just a speculation tho.

  • @CVA34WestPac
    @CVA34WestPac 11 днів тому

    Taiwan needs this system. I hope they have it.

  • @benoitnadeau5845
    @benoitnadeau5845 4 місяці тому

    Canada has northing to defend its 10M km2 airspace.🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂😄😄

  • @bighornproductionstv5923
    @bighornproductionstv5923 Рік тому

    It should have NASAM for drones not for missiles and jets only

    • @shamusshafer8578
      @shamusshafer8578 Рік тому

      Someone should make a NASAM format but much smaller and shorter range. Maybe 20 launch tubes and use guided 70mm rockets or something, specifically for shooting down medium and small drones. Cheap and quick response with good optical id and targeting of small shit should be the key here. Doesn't have to have 70km range, just enough to clear the sky of the eye's and grenade droppers.

    • @cigarsid7445
      @cigarsid7445 Рік тому +4

      @@shamusshafer8578 NASAMS integrates with C-RAM. A couple of programmable airburst rounds is more than enough to take down most drones in a relatively inexpensive way compared to most rocket systems. You also have more specialized short range systems like MANTIS using Oerlikons or the highly mobile VAMPIRE using small rockets

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      It can shoot down drones if it can detect them which is possible depending on their speed and aspect

  • @parambhatia3183
    @parambhatia3183 8 місяців тому

    Meray itnay pass yeh meray itnay pass with hai

  • @mdsaddamhossainlimoon4713
    @mdsaddamhossainlimoon4713 4 місяці тому

    Man fitback to settle both gun Droth rockets luncher
    Pepsolin Peanasonic peanasolin attack

  • @mdsaddamhossainlimoon4713
    @mdsaddamhossainlimoon4713 4 місяці тому

    Praysonic attack pennosilva

  • @josephlopez4041
    @josephlopez4041 Рік тому +1

    Put north I think 🥸🧠💀🫀

    • @dennisraymond2540
      @dennisraymond2540 Рік тому

      You're absolutely right... Good afternoon how are you doing over there hope you're having a wonderful day, it's a lovely day that the lord has made.

  • @khukiyeyepthomi9977
    @khukiyeyepthomi9977 Рік тому +1

    Long live NASAMS 💪⚡👌💐✌👈👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @aramisone7198
    @aramisone7198 4 місяці тому

    But why is it not mobile?

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et 4 місяці тому +1

    DOES UKRAINE HAVE THEM?

  • @frodeenerstad4406
    @frodeenerstad4406 Рік тому

    And now norway and usa want Polen to produce the ammunition to different weapons given to Ukraine from USA and Europe.

    • @BelltexTu
      @BelltexTu 11 місяців тому

      Poland has over the last decades became the military powerhouse of Europe. I am glad to have this wonderful country as an allied together with Finland. I hope and believe Poland will be the new manufacturer of advanced weapons for Nato in addition to Ukraine.

  • @lancecahill5486
    @lancecahill5486 Рік тому +4

    Wouldn't it be easier if Canada just gives Ukraine a gift card?

  • @alex3261
    @alex3261 Рік тому

    $1.4M / AIM-120 missile. or $1M / AIM-9X missile

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      Its cheap compared to patriot at $4.1M or SM-6 at $4.9M

  • @jimknopf8281
    @jimknopf8281 Рік тому +9

    Good News,Ukraine need it. 💛💙

    • @Donkeymaster9000
      @Donkeymaster9000 Рік тому

      Too late, we’re donating it to Russia. Remember to do your part

    • @z7_95z7
      @z7_95z7 Рік тому

      🦅🇷🇺🦅

  • @vinnysilmi2807
    @vinnysilmi2807 7 місяців тому

    Gaza needs these

  • @lfjm100
    @lfjm100 Рік тому

    Si son los mejores por qué Ucrania está a oscuras

    • @newrules-hx7gi
      @newrules-hx7gi Рік тому +1

      Because Ukraine is not a small county and they don't have enough air defense system to protect everywhere, even if they shoot down Russia missile some will still pass through

    • @deanbrown2061
      @deanbrown2061 Рік тому

      Because they Don't have hundreds of this system in Ukraine One suicide Drone Can take out electrical generator.

  • @cullennally463
    @cullennally463 Рік тому

    Russia going to find out

  • @UnitedUA
    @UnitedUA Рік тому +3

    Way to Roast them Orcs! 🤭
    Pootin Fails,
    Ukraine prevails! 💛💙

    • @juangalindo3323
      @juangalindo3323 Рік тому +1

      The ones suffering are the Ukrainian people thanks to Puppet Zelensky for not trying to negotiate a peace deal.

    • @Nero-Caesar
      @Nero-Caesar Рік тому

      But I thought Russia ran out of missiles months ago 🤔

    • @UnitedUA
      @UnitedUA Рік тому +1

      @@Nero-Caesar war doesn't work like that. 😂 war tourists.

    • @Nero-Caesar
      @Nero-Caesar Рік тому

      @@UnitedUA no shit

    • @UnitedUA
      @UnitedUA Рік тому +1

      @@Nero-Caesar ask stupid question and you get a stupid answer. 😂

  • @user-qu3tg1cr4l
    @user-qu3tg1cr4l Рік тому

    Nasams destroyed by Russian airforce februari 3 outside Donetsk!!

    • @daginn896
      @daginn896 Рік тому +1

      Lol, not true. Not one single nasam have been destroyed so far.

    • @user-qu3tg1cr4l
      @user-qu3tg1cr4l Рік тому

      @@daginn896 Donetsk, Feb 3 - DAN. Russian armed forces in the special military operation (SVO) zone have destroyed the first US-Norwegian National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System (NASAMS) supplied to Ukraine last autumn, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said on Friday in comments on SVO events.
      On the Kupyansk axis, damage was inflicted on manpower and equipment of the Ukrainian army’s 103rd Territorial Defense Brigade and 92nd Mechanized Brigade in the areas of Tabayevka and Berestovoye (Kharkov region) and Novoselovskoye (Lugansk People’s Republic). One armored combat vehicle and one US-made AN/TPQ-50 counterfire radar were destroyed.
      Two armored combat vehicles, one D-20 howitzer and one US-made M-777 artillery piece were destroyed on the Krasny Liman axis in the areas of Nevskoye (LPR), Yampolovka (DPR) and Serebryanka Forestry. A Ukrainian artillery ammunition dump was destroyed in the Krasny Liman town area.
      A MSTA-B howitzer and one US-made AN/TPQ-37 counterfire radar were destroyed on the Donetsk axis where Russian forces seized more advantageous lines and positions. One enemy fuel storage facility was destroyed in the Krasnoarmeisk area (DPR) and two ammunition dumps were destroyed in Kurakhovka and Mikhailovka (DPR). One Tochka-U tactical missile system and one NASAMS were destroyed in the Krasnoarmeisk area. It is the first NASAMS destroyed in the special military operation zone.
      On the Zaporozhye axis, Russian forces destroyed one US-made M-777 artillery piece, two D-20 howitzers and one D-30 howitzer.
      On the Kherson axis, one enemy “Akatsiya” self-propelled howitzer and two “Gvozdika” self-propelled howitzers were destroyed in counterbattery fight. In the Antonovka area (Kherson region), a US-made high mobility artillery rocket system (HIMARS) was destroyed.
      Russian air defense units downed seven Ukrainian drones, and the Russian Air Force shot down a Ukrainian MiG-29.*jk

  • @harsoniris9837
    @harsoniris9837 Рік тому

    It's a total non-sense to keep bragging this futile air defense if not send to Ukraine now. Come on show to the world now if true.

    • @daginn896
      @daginn896 Рік тому

      It's been in Ukraine for many months, and it has been a success.

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      Its already in ukraine and has been since atleast mid 2022

  • @ivandjordjevic5088
    @ivandjordjevic5088 Рік тому

    We saw in Ukraine how it works or better how crappy this weapon is!
    One thing is video and paper work and other in real war, in last Russian biggest rocket ever NASAMS didn't even discovered incoming attack so this video is good if you fight Vs Taliban's ( ups my mistake, they destroyed and humiliated USA and NATO army) or better Vs some country without rocket's at all!

    • @hdmccart6735
      @hdmccart6735 Рік тому +1

      You have best potassium?

    • @bjornlarsen7491
      @bjornlarsen7491 Рік тому +2

      Some people do not understand the difference between ballistic missil and cruise missil. Nasam is not buildt for shooting down ballistic missils.

    • @guillaumelalonde7945
      @guillaumelalonde7945 Рік тому +4

      Remind me again how successful was the soviet union in Afghanistan? If Russian equipment is so superior how come S400 can't even shoot down some slow cruise missiles from the 80s?

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      @@NORNISSE83 Im all for NASAMS but thats practically impossible, even if operator error, it is really hard for anything to get above 95%

    • @gibbo_303
      @gibbo_303 11 місяців тому

      I have not seen anything with actual proof of this system being destroyed or even being a crappy system (if you have some please link), its not even designed for ballistic targets, it is designed for fixed wing and cruise missiles and can also do a moderate job at helicopters and medium-large drones

  • @Nero-Caesar
    @Nero-Caesar Рік тому

    Yay more money for ukraine

  • @p1stolp.521
    @p1stolp.521 Рік тому +1

    can't wait to see the russ1ans make a bonfire out of this..

    • @matteusvirtanen392
      @matteusvirtanen392 Рік тому +7

      They've tried quite a few times but haven't really had much success.

    • @AlvarWahle
      @AlvarWahle Рік тому +7

      @@matteusvirtanen392that pretty much sums up the russian way of life

    • @hdmccart6735
      @hdmccart6735 Рік тому +5

      @@AlvarWahle That's the problem, when even by internal estimates approximately 30% of your population is affected by Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.

    • @AlvarWahle
      @AlvarWahle Рік тому

      @@hdmccart6735 that’s insane. I can understand why putin "questions" democracy. Bread, circuses and vodka?

    • @hdmccart6735
      @hdmccart6735 Рік тому

      @@AlvarWahle There are only 2 vodka production companies/distilleries in Russia - both state owned, they actively poison their own people. In terms of Putin, it's suggested that he is actually the wealthiest man on earth, largely via the mechanisms of capitalism. I honestly have no skin in the game regarding Russia or its people but when Russian/Pro-Russians mouth off I just have to pull them up...what a fucking human wasteland of a place to live...Cheers

  • @johnfrancisco1851
    @johnfrancisco1851 Рік тому +1

    Glory to ukraine 🇺🇦 we ❤️ you stay safe