Sony Alpha 1 + DZOFILM Catta Zooms (1st test)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- Camera: Sony Alpha 1
Lenses; DZOFILM Catta 35-80mm and 70-135mm
Matte box: Tilta Mirage
Production: adcom.it
DOP: Filippo Chiesa
Model: Valentina "Nina" Venturini
MUA: Serena Ballerini
Beautiful footage! What do you color grade with and do you use a particular lut? Wonderful images!
Thanks Scott! I used DaVinci Resolve without a particular LUT.
Filippo is there any way I could get my hands on your "Sigma fp + Angénieux 70 - 210mm" footage so I could try it with my colorist? I am seriously thinking of shooting my feature film debut with the exact same setup but would love to try it 'ungraded' so the DNG files? Kind regards from Amsterdam.
Filippo thanks so much for this video. Exemplary as always. Would love to know where you think this higher definition perhaps more digital image is heading. You mentioned previously how much you were enjoying the A1. Sharper more detailed for sure but with the announcement of the R5C, is 8K dslr resolution or high definition a new norm that is stretching the previously established aesthetic of film to something new? In the same way that HDTV had NHK newspresenters rushing for a better level of consealer, how far can sharper detail go without needing to be softened back? Rather like the experiments of Ang Lee, is reality or a hyper real image aesthetically by definition less impressionistic and in some way less an artistic interpretation and more a reflection of the capture process. Is it harder to suspended disbelief when the image is so "present". Of course I get that this is a test of the lens and in any test the priority is perhaps accuracy rather than exploring any directional aesthetic. Your previous posts have always been technically exemplary but also aesthetically very considered. Of course this is too, but I would love to know where you think the sweet spot might be. Thank so much for this and all your posts.
Hi Ken, thanks for your comment. I believe the point is in distinguishing film from digital and vice-versa. I think there is not a choice better than the other. All depends on what you want to communicate. I don't think there is a sweet spot in using 8K cameras. This higher definition can be adapted to various situations. If you have a good 8K camera, with a good codec, with a good color science and the right cadence, virtually, I thinh you could get any result.
@@filippochiesa-4kand8kstock64 hey thanks so much for your reply. I guess I am getting very confused by the variants in camera design and specifically sensor technology. I thought that I understood how pixel count and resolution affected the image of a camera but I’m struggling to see where the limiting factor is anymore. More pixels more processing?? Somewhere amongst the numbers the colour science, roll off, noise, olpf and shape of the log curve its become harder to see and understand what is really “creating” the images quality. Film and film stocks are so easy by comparison to understand but these days the regression of the image from reality that is perhaps synonymous with film is psychologically absent in the digital image when the resolution becomes so high without the attention to all those other parameters. Maybe it’s acquisition that’s manipulated in post but looking at films shot on 8k Monstro or dxl2s and those shot on an arri xt it’s clear something is going on that’s different but what exactly is it. Is it a completely different thing that is happening at the lower end of cameras now as processors get more powerful and in dslrs that don’t really pretend to be “cinema cameras” but prefer to be hybrid. It’s hard to call the A1 lower end and as you mentioned the future may we’ll be in hybrid cameras but is that from an operational point of view or fidelity or cost and availability. It may all come down to processing but in the age of raw why does anything need to be done in camera anymore anyway. I still can’t quite understand how a bmpcc4k can produce such great “filmic” images or why different cameras just look different. What is the ursa 12k really for? It surely can’t be about accuracy surely it has to be about taste. I’m not sure Kodak ever expected this. Sorry that this is so rambling but am I the only one struggling with this. Would love to know your thoughts.
@@KenFlanagan as you know, there are several factors to consider to get good images. A camera like the A1, for example, could virtually be a real game changer, for photo and video. It probably shares the same sensor of the new Venice 2 and technologically speaking, it would be able to record in X-OCN on-board, if Sony wanted to. I assume it's only a matter of marketing. Now we have the technology to produce perfect hybrid camera, but who knows if someone wants to do it.
Vraiment de magnifiques images avec une colorimétrie superbe encore merci
Cordialement
Jmarc
Merci beaucoup, Jean-Marc!
This is mind blowing! Great work. Catta lenses are aaaamazing
Thanks
Easyshave Media Solutions! Catta zooms are really great.