Low RPMs, low load, low boost, low consumption. Yet you have the high RPM high boost power for fun or emergencies. This is why I am interested in smaller, lighter engines with forced induction at high RPMs, over bigger engines of any kind. Especially if those little engines are well balanced and able to rev high.
I couldn’t agree less. My 1.4 L Abarth with a bigger turbo and zero work to the engine makes 325hp and 420nm. My Abarth averages 8.1L/100 Urban, while the Ford V8 Mustang averages 19.1L/100. With all the torque I produce, I can drive around town at a comfortable 2K revs in any gear I choose.
Bro. Best thought🎉. Plz suggest which cubic capacity turbo engines are efficient n cost effective. I.e. whether 1.5 litre, 2.0 litre , 2.5 or 3.0 litre turbo engines. Becoz, merely saying small turbo engines not efficient is enough; to educate car owners/buyers, u hv to clearly say that what kind of turbo engines are efficient.❤
All my neighbours cars have had problems. They drive better than mine till they fail. My 30 year old land cruiser tray back has never needed one repair and it does more work. If you are a poor working joe like me then listen to this bloke.
The keyword is "when driven hard" WHEN THEY'RE NOT DRIVEN HARD THEY PROVIDE BETTER FUEL EFFICIENCY SHORT OVERTAKES DON'T AFFECT THEM. Example 1 L TSI in polo and up!, 1 L TGDI in Hyundai i20 N line(Indian version) etc all these provide better mileage than 1.5 L Honda NA engines with similar power but better torque figure.
Thanks for watching - Subscribe for more amazing contents Here : ua-cam.com/channels/tIwnzRCHYBJigLVyKi4whg.html💙
Low RPMs, low load, low boost, low consumption. Yet you have the high RPM high boost power for fun or emergencies. This is why I am interested in smaller, lighter engines with forced induction at high RPMs, over bigger engines of any kind. Especially if those little engines are well balanced and able to rev high.
This is a “trust me bro” kind of video
I couldn’t agree less.
My 1.4 L Abarth with a bigger turbo and zero work to the engine makes 325hp and 420nm. My Abarth averages 8.1L/100 Urban, while the Ford V8 Mustang averages 19.1L/100. With all the torque I produce, I can drive around town at a comfortable 2K revs in any gear I choose.
Bro. Best thought🎉. Plz suggest which cubic capacity turbo engines are efficient n cost effective. I.e. whether 1.5 litre, 2.0 litre , 2.5 or 3.0 litre turbo engines.
Becoz, merely saying small turbo engines not efficient is enough; to educate car owners/buyers, u hv to clearly say that what kind of turbo engines are efficient.❤
If you keep them under threshold rpm pf boost, you get gas mileage
All my neighbours cars have had problems. They drive better than mine till they fail. My 30 year old land cruiser tray back has never needed one repair and it does more work. If you are a poor working joe like me then listen to this bloke.
The keyword is "when driven hard"
WHEN THEY'RE NOT DRIVEN HARD THEY PROVIDE BETTER FUEL EFFICIENCY SHORT OVERTAKES DON'T AFFECT THEM.
Example 1 L TSI in polo and up!, 1 L TGDI in Hyundai i20 N line(Indian version) etc all these provide better mileage than 1.5 L Honda NA engines with similar power but better torque figure.
Ask suzuki what they are doing.
This is 90% nonsense