Everything has been written about your constructive lesson by the other users , the only that i have to say is : Thank you Sir !! You also make us to practice our mind so that to make more complete sentences EVEN in our mother language !!
Thank you! Yes, we do these things in our own languages without realizing! It's for this reason that I do not consider there to be "unintelligent" people in the world - we have all done an incredible thing by learning our mother tongue!
Hello Rupert, You're a true "virtuoso" of the English language! I must admit that I waited with bated breath for each clause. It has been challenging but very, very rewarding. Having read some of the comments, I affirm that a little inaccuracy is not important when so much knowledge is made available to us all. Thank you.
Participial clause (Impressed by her performance in the Olympics) Object ( that because she ran so fast) Subject ( the newspaper) Verb (wrote) Main clause ( She won a medal) Extra ( the prize for victory) Subordinate adverb clause (although there were many opponents) Adjective clause ( who nearly beat her) Second independent clause (how she runs so fast is a mystery) Complement ( how she runs so fast) This is very r powerful video on sentence analysis. Thank you Rupert
In modern times , in India no mechanism to analyse the complex , mixed clauses or compound clauses .. It is surprising if any can not analyse the different dependent clauses how possible to join....... No knowledge in analysing, no know about joining, splitting .. Or vise versa.. Sir pl continue .. Pl understand why I must.. If excess pl forgive me.. You are super.. Fav
This video is really helpful for me! I love the way you developed the flow of ideas and built them! Please keep going on this content. Thank you very much!
Great. You covered some advanced English grammar parts. Advanced English grammar is difficult for me to understand. So, I learned many things from your class. Thanks a million.
Thank you! I agree with you - I covered a lot of things in this video, but each issue could have been covered in far more detail through examples and practice. They will definitely appear again in the future! 😀
Thank you! I have been pleased with the response to the video, so I will definitely cover the same issues again in the future, as the video could have been 3 hours long if I'd covered everything with examples and practice 😁
When you left out relative pronoun with the verb to be in the adjective clause that was the case of participate phrase (clause) in both active or passive voice, why the prepositional phrase drag you in there ?
Hi! I'm not 100% sure about the point you are making, but it is certainly true that the presence of a prepositional phrase can make the difference between when we omit/do not omit the relative pronoun + to be. However, I'm not entirely sure that this answers your question, so please ask more if you need to 🙂
@@EnglishwithRupert Let take transitional verb "annoy", for example. Put it in your sentence structure in such a way: "There were a lot of opponents annoying her", isn't it allowed?!
Yes, this works. The relative pronoun + to be can often be omitted before a present participle when it is followed by more information - usually a preposition phrase, but also in some other situations such as the one you've mentioned (present participle + object pronoun). It is a messy area of grammar - some people may use omission before any instance of a present participle, for instance, but many would consider it unnatural when the participle is not followed by anything.
Thank you, sir. Which is correct, please? Impressed by his performance, there is a need to consider promoting him to the first team. Impressed by his performance, we need to consider promoting him to the first team. Impressed by his performance, it is necessary to consider promoting him to the first team.
The key things are to remember "Impressed by his performance" is really a shortened passive, and the subject needs to be the same as in the main clause. The example in the video was "Impressed by his performance, the newspapers wrote that..." It really means this: "The newspapers were impressed by his performance. (Therefore,) The newspapers wrote that...". The implications for your sentences are as follows: 1) "There" would not make a logical subject for "Impressed by his performance" if it were expanded into a passive form. 2) (Normally) the past participle will affect another clause which is in the past tense, so "Impressed by his performance, we needed to consider..." could work here (i.e. "needed" is in the past simple) 3) This is similar to 1) - "it" would not make sense as a subject for the full sentence in the passive (i.e. "It was impressed by his performance"). I hope that's helpful but I'm happy to clarify further :)
Sometimes, I am in confusion which Grammar we follow prescriptive or Descriptive.. Basic know must otherwise cannot follow Dynamic.. Or Descriptive or Sir Rupert's Advanced English..... As we are lucky enough. M
This is a very good point - at an advanced level of English, we need to go further than using good grammar, but we also need to choose the appropriate language for the situation (e.g. descriptive or factual). This coming Friday's video is going to cover just a little of this issue 🙂
You missed: 1. relative clause having an object of prepositions 2.mystery after is not an object of is since it is VI instead,it functions as a subject complement 3.the last clause is that clause acting as a noun complement after a noun , mystery.I might disagree with you on this that I think it acts as an adjective or relative clause modifying a noun , mystery as in: I can't explain a mystery (as an object of verb explain. For the rest,you rock them.
Wow, I am impressed - you have studied the video brilliantly! 1. Well spotted! Thank you for bringing this to our attention. In my more detailed videos, I do sometimes miss minor things, and it is useful to have a comments section where they can be clarified 🙂 2. I must have misspoken somewhere by accident as I 100% agree with you - perhaps I said "object" when I meant to say "noun" (I don't script my videos) - fortunately i don't think it was crucial to the meaning of the point I was making 👍 3. I think I highlighted this at the end of the "that clauses" section, but my apologies if I didn't make it clear enough - again, I agree with you, of course 😀 I'm glad you found everything else useful 👍👍
Many without following in accuracy.. Tell that have got knowledge.. About clauses Nominal or Adverbial and others. Not so easy.. Pl di not stand limping. Let Sir understand our limitation then he thinks more... If they follow, pl leave the sir and follow him as well are still learners.. Pl
If they did not go through Nesfield Grammar, nay have not basic know about clauses, Restricted, Non.. Restricted, Noun clauses, Adverbial clauses... Parenthetical clauses etc.. Pl if they knowledge then app start , we ask questions instead.. Pl
i would say this video is amazing when you want to gain C2 as soon as possible , it had taken me around 1 years to get this level, thank you sir
多謝！
😁😁😁🙏🙏🙏
Everything has been written about your constructive lesson by the other users , the only that i have to say is : Thank you Sir !! You also make us to practice our mind so that to make more complete sentences EVEN in our mother language !!
Thank you! Yes, we do these things in our own languages without realizing! It's for this reason that I do not consider there to be "unintelligent" people in the world - we have all done an incredible thing by learning our mother tongue!
Hello Rupert,
You're a true "virtuoso" of the English language!
I must admit that I waited with bated breath for each clause. It has been challenging but very, very rewarding.
Having read some of the comments, I affirm that a little inaccuracy is not important when so much knowledge is made available to us all.
Thank you.
I'm pleased you enjoyed this video, Fabiana, and thank you for the lovely comments!
Participial clause (Impressed by her performance in the Olympics)
Object ( that because she ran so fast)
Subject ( the newspaper)
Verb (wrote)
Main clause ( She won a medal)
Extra ( the prize for victory)
Subordinate adverb clause (although there were many opponents)
Adjective clause ( who nearly beat her)
Second independent clause (how she runs so fast is a mystery)
Complement ( how she runs so fast)
This is very r powerful video on sentence analysis. Thank you Rupert
I love that analysis 😁👍
That's awesome. Thank you very much Teacher Rupert. I've learned so many new words and structures, it's always exciting.❤️😊🙏
I appreciate your comments as ever! Have a great weekend 😀
My pleasure! I hope you have a great weekend too.❤😊🙏
Thanks for millions ❤teacher
In modern times , in India no mechanism to analyse the complex , mixed clauses or compound clauses .. It is surprising if any can not analyse the different dependent clauses how possible to join....... No knowledge in analysing, no know about joining, splitting .. Or vise versa.. Sir pl continue .. Pl understand why I must.. If excess pl forgive me.. You are super.. Fav
This video is really helpful for me! I love the way you developed the flow of ideas and built them! Please keep going on this content. Thank you very much!
Thank you for the kind comment and for the encouragement to make more similar videos!
Thanks teacher for your support!
It's a pleasure to support you 😀
Great. You covered some advanced English grammar parts. Advanced English grammar is difficult for me to understand. So, I learned many things from your class. Thanks a million.
I hope this video helped you make progress with English. Thanks for commenting 🙂
very useful n interesting this youtube. tq
Thanks for commenting! 🤠
Comprehensive presentation......thank you...
You're welcome 😁🤗
Rupert , thank you so much for such an amazing lecture.
You're Gem 💎
That's so kind of you! I'm glad you enjoyed it 😁
This video is educational.Thank you very much.Please make a video on adverb, participial and adjective phrases and their functions separately
Thank you! I agree with you - I covered a lot of things in this video, but each issue could have been covered in far more detail through examples and practice. They will definitely appear again in the future! 😀
Thanks❤
It's a pleasure 😁
Thanks for millions ❤teacher
I'm delighted that you enjoyed the video 😀👍
Thanks a lot for giving such basic information about grammar
❤❤❤ thanks 👍
You're very welcome!
You deserve so much thanks for this video, it is really appreciated. I wish you to make this kind of videos. :))
Thank you! I have been pleased with the response to the video, so I will definitely cover the same issues again in the future, as the video could have been 3 hours long if I'd covered everything with examples and practice 😁
@@EnglishwithRupert ohh sounds great:)
I am looking forward to watching it 🙏😊
❤thanks
Thank you.
You're very, very welcome 😁
Great speechless no words to express
I really appreciate the kind comment - thank you!!
.excellent lesson...
Thanks for the lovely comment 🙂
Great job,dear.❤❤❤❤
Thanks SpeakerFA 😀
You are great sir
Thanks for your kind comment 🙂
Fav sir, simple sentence & compound sentence difference ol
It's really awesome!
Thanks 👍
Thanks fav
It's a pleasure 😁
Nice video sir please make videos on chunks
Thanks for the suggestion! I have many plans for videos during the autumn, and I think "chunks" will appear at some point 🙂
❤from Pakistan
Thanks for commenting 🙂
When you left out relative pronoun with the verb to be in the adjective clause that was the case of participate phrase (clause) in both active or passive voice, why the prepositional phrase drag you in there ?
Hi! I'm not 100% sure about the point you are making, but it is certainly true that the presence of a prepositional phrase can make the difference between when we omit/do not omit the relative pronoun + to be. However, I'm not entirely sure that this answers your question, so please ask more if you need to 🙂
@@EnglishwithRupert Let take transitional verb "annoy", for example. Put it in your sentence structure in such a way: "There were a lot of opponents annoying her", isn't it allowed?!
Yes, this works. The relative pronoun + to be can often be omitted before a present participle when it is followed by more information - usually a preposition phrase, but also in some other situations such as the one you've mentioned (present participle + object pronoun). It is a messy area of grammar - some people may use omission before any instance of a present participle, for instance, but many would consider it unnatural when the participle is not followed by anything.
Awesome
Thanks so much for the lovely comment!
Good sir❤
Thanks for commenting 🙂
Plz make more videos on advanced sentences.
I intend to keep making advanced videos, and sentences will definitely come into it at times 😁
... I wish I was able to do this in my own language (I am not...) ...the process of digesting it will take some time ...
It took me years of teaching English before I understood most of this! Thanks for commenting 🙂
Thank you, sir. Which is correct, please?
Impressed by his performance, there is a need to consider promoting him to the first team.
Impressed by his performance, we need to consider promoting him to the first team.
Impressed by his performance, it is necessary to consider promoting him to the first team.
The key things are to remember "Impressed by his performance" is really a shortened passive, and the subject needs to be the same as in the main clause. The example in the video was "Impressed by his performance, the newspapers wrote that..." It really means this: "The newspapers were impressed by his performance. (Therefore,) The newspapers wrote that...". The implications for your sentences are as follows:
1) "There" would not make a logical subject for "Impressed by his performance" if it were expanded into a passive form.
2) (Normally) the past participle will affect another clause which is in the past tense, so "Impressed by his performance, we needed to consider..." could work here (i.e. "needed" is in the past simple)
3) This is similar to 1) - "it" would not make sense as a subject for the full sentence in the passive (i.e. "It was impressed by his performance").
I hope that's helpful but I'm happy to clarify further :)
@@EnglishwithRupert
Thank you for the explanation. This means ‘There’ and ‘it’ are not logical subjects in this context, right?
That's correct - they don't work with the context
Sometimes, I am in confusion which Grammar we follow prescriptive or Descriptive.. Basic know must otherwise cannot follow Dynamic.. Or Descriptive or Sir Rupert's Advanced English..... As we are lucky enough. M
This is a very good point - at an advanced level of English, we need to go further than using good grammar, but we also need to choose the appropriate language for the situation (e.g. descriptive or factual). This coming Friday's video is going to cover just a little of this issue 🙂
Can I use the sentence THERE WERE MANY OPPONENTS BEATEN BY HER without using ALL ?
Yes, absolutely - I added "all" to make the context clear for the teaching point, but there is no grammatical need to add it 🙂
@@EnglishwithRupert Thanks
You missed:
1. relative clause having an object of prepositions
2.mystery after is not an object of is since it is VI instead,it functions as a subject complement
3.the last clause is that clause acting as a noun complement after a noun , mystery.I might disagree with you on this that I think it acts as an adjective or relative clause modifying a noun , mystery as in: I can't explain a mystery (as an object of verb explain.
For the rest,you rock them.
Wow, I am impressed - you have studied the video brilliantly!
1. Well spotted! Thank you for bringing this to our attention. In my more detailed videos, I do sometimes miss minor things, and it is useful to have a comments section where they can be clarified 🙂
2. I must have misspoken somewhere by accident as I 100% agree with you - perhaps I said "object" when I meant to say "noun" (I don't script my videos) - fortunately i don't think it was crucial to the meaning of the point I was making 👍
3. I think I highlighted this at the end of the "that clauses" section, but my apologies if I didn't make it clear enough - again, I agree with you, of course 😀
I'm glad you found everything else useful 👍👍
Many without following in accuracy.. Tell that have got knowledge.. About clauses Nominal or Adverbial and others. Not so easy.. Pl di not stand limping. Let Sir understand our limitation then he thinks more... If they follow, pl leave the sir and follow him as well are still learners.. Pl
If they did not go through Nesfield Grammar, nay have not basic know about clauses, Restricted, Non.. Restricted, Noun clauses, Adverbial clauses... Parenthetical clauses etc.. Pl if they knowledge then app start , we ask questions instead.. Pl
Not clear sentences pl