Advanced English Grammar: Perfect Tenses (For C2 Learners)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
  • bit.ly/perfectenglishgrammarJune2024
    To speak proficient English at a C2 level (IELTS 8.0+), you need to know more than just basic Present Perfect tense rules. You need to know all of the advanced ways in which English speakers use the Present Perfect and Past Perfect. This video teaches you 20 advanced English grammar rules and conventions for the Present and Past Perfect and other ways of expressing the past in English at a C1 English or C2 English level.
    For a course covering ALL of English grammar from beginner to C2 level, take my "PERFECT ENGLISH GRAMMAR" course. *CURRENTLY ON SPECIAL OFFER through this link
    bit.ly/perfect...
    Join this course for 40 hours of content (600 videos) produced by myself, including lessons, practice tasks, speaking exercises and progress checks. 28 day money back guarantee.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 53

  • @oakstrong1
    @oakstrong1 2 місяці тому +3

    Because I did not study English but I learned it by immersion, I could not explain the meaning clearly to anyone else, despite understanding them myself. Neither vould anyone in my household despite being native speakers. This is why most native speakers do not make good teachers, not at least if you want to pass an exam!

  • @imaginx-si8zu
    @imaginx-si8zu 26 днів тому +2

    Your intensity and interest in teaching is amazing.only few teachers do it.❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 from India

  • @ian2121
    @ian2121 3 місяці тому +2

    Your ability to convey the essence of the issue without many words is simply amazing. Brevity is the soul of wit. Thank you.

  • @chishinglee3170
    @chishinglee3170 11 днів тому +1

    You are an excellent English teacher. Very clear. I love to watch once I saw.

  • @kamiliabdelkodouss2335
    @kamiliabdelkodouss2335 3 місяці тому +2

    Good job. I appreciate this channel!

  • @englishwithmuzammal3596
    @englishwithmuzammal3596 3 місяці тому +2

    This is the most challenging tense for students to grasp in the Middle East.
    I have a hard time making them fathom the concept.
    However, there is only one way to get it right, which is to practice with communal examples from their own lives.
    Ask students to think about the situations they go through where they can use it. In doing so, they somehow start grasping the essence of its usage.
    Grammar about how to use 'has or have with verbs' is effortless for students; the problem arises when they start comparing it with the past as the time clause is used in both by modern writers.
    I spent 20 years in England. (here the action is done)
    I have lived for 20 years in England. ( done but relevant to the present)
    I have lived/have been living in England in the past for 20 years ( this is too complex for students)
    I think teaching grammar is useless in many ways; some students, I have observed, speak accurate English just by talking without knowing the rules and grammar. This works. I dunno how.
    Your way of teaching is recommendable for teachers, but not, with due respect, for students.
    Thank you for reading.

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому +1

      I agree with some of your points. In particular, I agree that it is so important to practice what you learn and to make it personal - using structures in situations that have personal relevance is vital to make meaningful progress. However, I do think that videos like this one have a purpose for students. I set up this channel to be a resource for students who are already fairly advanced in their English and want to reach an even higher level. For students like this, my videos are useful for filling gaps in their knowledge. With the perfect tenses, for instance, they will already know how to use the passive to some extent but they may be confused over one or two issues. That's why I make videos with so many points - I'm aiming at students who might know 15 of the points, but are confused about the other 5. But I agree, for a student who is completely new to the present perfect, a video like this needs to be used alongside other supporting materials which make the learning more individually relevant to the learner.
      I would like to think these videos are useful for other teachers too - yes.
      Thanks for commenting!

    • @englishwithmuzammal3596
      @englishwithmuzammal3596 3 місяці тому +1

      @@EnglishwithRupert I second what you mentioned about students or teachers. In fact, teachers are, too, students for good. In the Middle East, students are going abroad; namely, the UK that has opened the doors for online visas for only SAUDIS.
      It's summer break here, and most students are in UK, for they think practicing English with an English speaking enviornemnt/household is way better than studying in the institutions by going through boring books and lethargic sessions in the classrooms.
      Futhermore, online learning has a huge impact on the enrollment of new studetns in the Universities. Time is, certainly, changing where students are prone to methods which are beneficial and afforable according to their availability so that they could enjoy life-which is only for once. Thank you for reading.

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому

      @englishwithmuzammal3596 It's really good to chat with you - I can tell you understand the situation well! I'm actually teaching a group in the UK at the moment that contains a number of Saudis/Kuwaitis. They are really good students, and are picking up the language quickly! I am blessed with a class containing a range of nationalities, so I am able to give them extensive speaking practice, which I feel is one of their main needs. I would love to teach on UA-cam as I do in the classroom, but I'm finding that to be successful on UA-cam, everything needs to be fast, or people stop watching and the "algorithm" doesn't promote the video as much as it would otherwise. I hope my videos might be used as "self-study" or "extension" materials that teachers can offer their advanced level students after a class where the concepts are introduced. I, also, cannot stand bored students in my classes 🙂

    • @englishwithmuzammal3596
      @englishwithmuzammal3596 3 місяці тому +2

      @@EnglishwithRupert I share the same sentiments; with you, comparing notes with you seems to be a knowledge-enhancing experience. When a faction of students returned from the UK with their language learning certificates in English with high-rewarding titles, upon assessment, it occurred that their level of language was not tantamount to the blessed grades; whereas, one underdog group of students attained in IELTS band 8 only by self-studying, in one village of Bangladesh, whilst evidently demonstrates that place or teachers might never matter if someone is stoked about learning anything.
      I posit this is the game of a mindset.
      Thank you for reading.

  • @shanurrahmansabri3347
    @shanurrahmansabri3347 3 місяці тому +2

    Love from India ♥️ you are amazing.flawless explanation. Now I can take breath about those rules.i really appreciate your hard work 💕 you are gem.

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому

      I'm so pleased you've found this video useful! Best wishes Rupert 🙂

  • @annvlogs1397
    @annvlogs1397 3 місяці тому +2

    Impressive! I’ve never seen a person who can explain in such a simple way

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому +1

      Thanks Ann! I'm glad it all made sense to you :) Thanks for commenting!

  • @user-cc2ux9ew1r
    @user-cc2ux9ew1r 3 місяці тому +1

    Thanks ever so much for your time as well as your tremendous lessons.
    You are quite a Gramarian !

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому

      It's lovely to receive your thanks! All the best, Rupert :)

  • @JustPractise
    @JustPractise 2 місяці тому +1

    You are a "Top Notch" english teacher.

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  2 місяці тому

      That's very kind of you 🙂 thanks for commenting

  • @kdcwd5104
    @kdcwd5104 3 місяці тому +1

    Great explanation. Thank you. 🙏

  • @Barbel-gs6pe
    @Barbel-gs6pe Місяць тому +1

    Thank you. It is an excellent video!

  • @gregoriussudaryono260
    @gregoriussudaryono260 3 місяці тому +1

    Finally, I understand it better than before, dear Teacher. Thanks so much for the explanation. 🙏 12:13

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому

      That's great to hear! Thanks for commenting. Rupert 🙂

  • @นลินรัตน์วิชานนท์กุลศรี

    I really appreciate your hard work. That's very useful! ❤️😊🙏

  • @Peaceharmony-q9v
    @Peaceharmony-q9v 2 місяці тому +1

    You have given the gist of English in a short lecture. You have good experience about teaching students!

  • @user-yx4cq4wl2m
    @user-yx4cq4wl2m 3 місяці тому +1

    Thanks. I'm much impressed by your class

  • @ambedkarkorapati3870
    @ambedkarkorapati3870 Місяць тому +1

    Good evening Rupert. Thank you for yet another fantastic video. I have a few doubts that may please be clarified. Under the heading "9.PAST PERFECT PHRASES" They discussed the CEO.......... We discuss something or We discuss something with someone.I was unable to make sense of it. Is it "We discussed it with the CEO........
    The second doubt is " Has been is someone who can't do something now like they did it when they were younger " Many non-native speakers(including me) tend to use young instead of younger.One may be under the misplaced impression that "young" itself is ok in the said context. Does the comparative form of the adjective convey the meaning of the hidden phrase "than they are now"?

    • @ambedkarkorapati3870
      @ambedkarkorapati3870 Місяць тому

      Sorry, Is it "They discussed it with the CEO......................

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  Місяць тому

      Hi! Good questions.
      1) In hindsight, this wasn't the clearest example. It is possible to say "They discussed + someone" if that person is the main topic of conversation, but it's not particularly common and your idea is far more likely to be used in real life English, to be honest.
      2. "Younger" in this context simply means "younger than now" (s comparative). It is normal to omit "than now" in the phrase "when I was + comparative"

    • @ambedkarkorapati3870
      @ambedkarkorapati3870 Місяць тому

      @@EnglishwithRupert Thank you very much Rupert for clarifying my doubts 🙏

  • @manoochehrghanbari2325
    @manoochehrghanbari2325 3 місяці тому +1

    Thanks

  • @user-cc2ux9ew1r
    @user-cc2ux9ew1r 3 місяці тому +2

    N 6 inversion.
    Little mistake there, it's been written * starting instead started*

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому

      WELL SPOTTED :) You are absolutely right! When I teach in a classroom, I can simply rub the word off the whiteboard and write the correction in its place. Unfortunately, mistakes on UA-cam stay mistakes forever... ;)

  • @Ruthra95
    @Ruthra95 3 місяці тому +1

    Thank you sir 😊

  • @user-cc2ux9ew1r
    @user-cc2ux9ew1r 3 місяці тому +1

    Hi again,
    You could not please tell us if those 2 sentences mean the same thing, could you?
    I was eating when the phone rang
    I had been when the phone rang.
    Any difference between them two?

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому

      Possibly yes, possibly no! They have the same meaning in that the eating happened immediately before the phone rang. However, "I had been eating" could also refer to a period of eating which had finished a short while before the phone rang (although recent enough to feel as if it were connected to the next event), whereas "I was eating" can only mean an interrupted activity in this context.

  • @deeknight8202
    @deeknight8202 3 місяці тому +1

    I heard a native speaker say something like that :
    'This material has been copywritered in 2007'.
    Is it grammatically correct?
    Shouldn't it be 'was' instead of 'has been'?

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому +1

      Hi Dee! In terms of traditional grammar rules, you are correct. However, there appears to be a movement, particularly in journalism, towards occasionally combining the present perfect and the past simple in one sentence. I think it comes from a simplification of the pattern where you introduce something with the present perfect in one sentence, and then add the details with the past simple in the next (for instance: "The material has been copyrighted. This was done in 2007.") - maybe, to save space or to get the readers to the facts more quickly, some people are now combining the introduction and extra details into one quick sentence, so we quickly get the sense of "this happened in the past" along with "this is when" in quick succession. I'd suggest this usage is still uncommon, but something to watch in the coming years! Best wishes Rupert :)

    • @deeknight8202
      @deeknight8202 3 місяці тому +1

      @@EnglishwithRupert Thank you! This is most helpful. I've never heard this explained before. Your videos are great. Keep up the good work!

  • @dan93431
    @dan93431 3 місяці тому +1

    Hi, in the part 18:21, Can I say 1)"After you seeing the show, you must leave by the left exit.
    Or
    2) After you having seen the show, you must leave by the left exit. I think these are incorrect.

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому

      Both 1) and 2) have slight errors. You could possibly say "After, you must leave by the left exit", but it would be very unusual to insert an information clause after "you". Let me know if you'd like further clarification.

  • @sandipbangal3752
    @sandipbangal3752 4 місяці тому +1

    Doing the work/Having done the work/after doing the work/After Having done the work,I go home.sir,do they carry the same meaning?please explain as they make me confused.

    • @EnglishwithRupert
      @EnglishwithRupert  3 місяці тому

      There are some slight differences. In "Doing the work, I went home", "doing" would refer to an activity in progress at the same time as going home. "After doing the work" means this is the activity before "I went home". The options with "having" are similar to this, but there's a sense of cause/effect - perhaps the work needed to be done before the person could go home, or perhaps it was logical to go home after finishing the work - we'd need more context to know precisely, but the word "having" here suggests a stronger link than just saying "after" without "having".