I never considered Yang as a legitimate candidate before. But I'm slowly changing my mind on that. I think he is thoughtful, well spoken and thinks things through before he speaks.. and that's just a few of the many things I am liking about him. I think he should run again.
Back in the run up to 2020, what excluded him from legitimacy in your perception? Certainly you were not alone in that. Also, did you have candidates at the time besides the guy who won who did appear legitimate? What were the factors that informed your perception?
@@brockmiller574 I'm curious on this as well. I was a big Yang supporter and it's always interesting to hear how ppl outside of my bubble perceived him
Hmm, so what happened? Decided to take off your ideological blinders and decided to listen for a change? Gross. Maybe don't vote until you decide to start listening 100% of the time? Thanks in advance!
The transition from Yang talking about the millions of jobs about to disappear and the question about the hat is like something out of the Hunger Games.
I actually agree, but probably for different reasons than you. She never said a true word that she thought, except showing that she was so woke that she HAD to assert her pro-Palestinians/anti-Israel into the Israel argument. As a Jewish Dem, I hate having to listen to self-hating Jews. But all that aside, every answer she gave was extremely political and CAREFUL. Too afraid that people might hate to hear what she really thinks.
@@jbjacobs9514 Ah that's an interesting take, with the criticism of her pro Palestinian line. I'm curious how ppl feel about Slotkin on here, especially given that she's now running for the Senate
That lady at the Oscars is problematic of a bigger problem. People simply not caring about their fellow citizens. It's minor for the moment, but it's a major problem across the country.
It clearly was. I would say inconsiderate is an even more accurate word. However I agree with Noa that it also wasn't worth using as a question on Overtime.
I like Andrew Yang. He studies a topic before he speaks of it. In my opinion he would be a good senator. I would vote for him and I'm a registered Republican.
@@robertpolanco1973 I'm not gonna vote for either. He's not far from them either. Just bc I don't like Biden and Trump, It doesn't mean I'm gonna vote for their love child. It's this mind set that got us in this mess. We have made it so easy for any candidate to get elected as long as they hate someone we hate. push comes to shove, Yang is voting for himself and the democrats.
@@RasTona_ Yang is NOT a Democrat in any way because he is more of a third-party alternative! Furthermore, EVERY politician in this country votes for himself/herself anyway for many decades, too!
@@robertpolanco1973 He's NOT a democrat in anyway?? He ran on their ticket, and on the same episode he was pleading with biden to give other democrats like himself a chance. "Third party" means different from party 1 and party2. There's no such thing as a "more of a third party". Just come-out and say " we are 3rd party, this is our plan........" but thanks for admitting Yang is all about himself just like other politicians. So why do we need more of just like the other politicians?
What I wanted to ask is what if they put another person of color with an even more broadly feathered and fanned out elaborate outfit in front of her?????
Andrew needs to work on spicing up his own podcast again but I know he has been too busy. 😕 Did you know that a #YangGang meme is how we got Ke Huy Kwon back into acting with Everything Everywhere All at Once?
Overworked Land surveyor here, My career is one of those Jobs that is absolutely critical to all construction and mapping services. 15 years Experience and I am done, I found myself working harder as i got older and its not because I am aging in reverse. My company could not find any hires and the ones they do find are worthless. I had to go around fixing everything they did, taking time out of my own work. We were literally operating crews messing everything up and the old crews that fix all those mistakes. Forced to work 6 day work weeks and 10 hour days, my father passed away without hardly seeing me because of my work schedule. Calling me jaded is a understatement.
If you're in such high demand then push back against the "Man". I'm a network engineer and we're in much the same predicament. The schools churn out discombobulated young people with poor social skills who can't/won't do the job. More than half of them leave the field in the first two years. The rest of us who can do this get to call the shots. I hand pick my clients and say "No" all the time. There is a labor shortage in this country that's only getting worse.
If what you state is true then you should absolutely bring it up to your managers and bosses. Tell them about the extra work you need to put in. Do NOT work for free quietly and complain on the side. Seriously from what youve said it sounds like you offer a lot more to the company and deserve to be paid more.
It will be when the elections come up. Then it will be "Biden's fault" for not stopping AI from advancing or some shit. People always find the way to blame the president, even though it's the corporations that obviously run the show.
Every time I listen to Andrew Yang I'm really impressed. I wish his Forward party luck as America could really benefit from a healthy 3rd political party. BTW most democracies have multiple political parties that offers more choice and helps reduce that bipartisan tribal edge that now consumes America. My family are duel citizen, Canadian and American and I've always wondered why the American public tolerate having just two political parties while they can go to a Walmart and choose 8 different kinds of Yogurt at the Grocery store.
I'm not sure about every democratic country, or Canada for that matter. But seems to me there's only 2 parties in the UK. Labor and Tories. The only ones who seem to get power. The US has more than 2 parties, but only the 2 major parties hold the power. Same thing no?
Maybe in 2027, the country and world is going through too much shit right now, a second term for Biden means he comes with experience and we don't need someone coming in with a learning curve right now. Let Biden also continue steering the country to the left more.
Because he's a rich guy who would benefit from automation. I doubt anyone in his immediate family will lose a job to a machine so of course he's ok with it.
@@noire.blackheart Where did he gaslight anyone? CS jobs will be the first to fall. I got laid off from a CS job last year. We got replaced by a chat bot.
Everytime I see Yang come back to the public spotlight, he is still consistently addressing the actual REAL issues in America. He was right about everything and points out we're wasting time everyday fighting battles between extreme Democrats and Republicans and getting further divided and further from solving our problems more effectively. Someone please get this awesome man in office! 🙌
As lil Andy yang ATTACKS " get rid of Trump" yet Yang is eatin up with abscessed TDS...Attacking and creating the great divide towards HONEST AMERICANS that support the finest POTUS ever in the history of the USA. T R U M P ..as an independent I voted for Hillary and Obama... HUGEE mistake.. someday perhaps you will see the light ..Go WOKE Go Broke !
Rep Slotkin has a few good points, but she is completely wrong about a third party. A third party would NOT be an extreme party; it would be the moderates from both parties. We all are tried of the extremes in BOTH parties. We also have a new appreciation for Andrew Yang.
Americans work in call centers??? Every time I call for customer service I get somebody from a country that I can't understand what they're saying. Most are from India.
True. In my job in IT I've had to place a lot of calls to call centers over the last 20 or so years. Used to be you would get a majority of American's on the other end of the line. In the last 8 or so years I can't remember the last time I spoke to an American. Vast majority are Indian with a smattering of Phillipinos.
As an attorney and as a citizen I was appalled and annoyed at most of Elissa’s answers and her commitment to avoiding the issue by saying “I don’t know about that.” Andrew and, increasingly Bill, are very reasonable and down to earth.
That’s how you campaign for the right. I am immigrant, I pass at a lady saying college is for teacher people to be good . Ugh, my parents were farm workers, they sent me to law school. College here is condescending with working class people
would love a chance to vote for him in the primary, and even if he doesnt win, i may end up writing his name in anyway. Im getting tired of going with the worse choice because theyre more popular.
Shame that ChatGPT got glossed over. AI is a HUGE threat and also an extremely important tool we’ll want to develop and Yang could have directly connected it to UBI which we all will probably need.
As a programmer these discussions about "AI" are killing me - ChatGPT and other LLM's are not even remotely close to AGI, we need to be clearer about what we're discussing because otherwise it's prone to misinterpretation or exploitation. If you start off the discussion talking about "AI" I just instantly assume you have no idea what you're talking about.
@@hew195050 What most people are now calling "AI" is really just an extremely large language model which performs inference calculations. It's just extremely fine-tuned by humans to produce what we would expect. It's actually kind of scary how well some of this has worked, like a lot of us don't really understand why training it on certain datasets has worked so well.
Most people think of a strong AI when talking about AIs, however, any system that can use pattern recognition in order to generate new, topic relevant content, can be considered an AI. Moreover, defining AI aside, chatGPT has a major influence on the Junior developer job market. Sadly it is a problem, and as these technology and others like it continue to develop, it will effect more and more people.
Pro life is a religious belief. Prove to me that it’s not a violation of separation of church (beliefs) and state! Forcing a religious belief on the country is a flat out violation of the separation of church and state!
“Caring about human life is a religious belief. How dare you make murder illegal!” I get that it’s not that simple, but everything about how we treat people comes back to our fundamental beliefs about the world (whether religious or humanist or whatever other term that gets at the basic philosophy you live your life based on). There are atheists that oppose abortion. My opposition of third-trimester and hesitancy about second-trimester abortion comes from my psychology classes where we talked about how fetuses do encode memory in the womb (the closest standard we have to personhood, unless you are going to claim that the average baby does not achieve personhood until 2 years of age and some people with various disabilities never reach personhood, both ideas that I reject, largely because of my religion).
@@marvinmartin4692 extreme by what measure? Roman father's could kill their underaged kids. That was only 1500 years ago. Our government is in part based on Rome. What determines ethics? If culture promotes an ideal how is it wrong?
As a person that has recently setup a call center, i agree they are getting cut. After covid they cut back 80% and I had to pack up and move a lot of that same equipment.
The problem we have with the job market and the labor force is that we have a ton of open jobs that pay crap and treat workers like garbage, but companies are unwilling to change so they just claim "nobody wants to work" Then we have many open jobs for skilled workers, but there's a shortage of those workers because nobody has those skills. We can blame the education system, but we also need to blame companies because they won't train or groom anyone. They expect someone to walk in and have little to no onboarding and just get right to it. Then finally, we have lots of jobs out there open, people could do them, they pay well, but companies have these horrendously broken recruiting systems that drag things out forever and ever to actually finally hire somebody, and then they come in to a toxic workplace and want to leave very quickly. The reality is that too many companies had it too good when we had an overabundance of people and a shortage of jobs. It's sad even that some companies want to go back to that. The writing was on the wall after the pandemic, but companies are just living in denial and still claiming that "culture" and "in-person collaboration" are the big things, when they are not. They also still won't pay a living wage that somebody in those vicinities can live on. That, or they won't let these people be remote and go live someplace where they can afford to live on that salary. So now they want to bring in AI and just replace more people. What's going to happen when now you have a plethora of population unable to afford to buy anything? I guarantee those same companies are then going to be lobbying the government to set up socialist programs and pay these companies taxpayer money to basically give out their goods or services.
The same procedure is used by an OB/GYN to treat an ectopic pregnancy as a doctor would use to provide an elective abortion...and states like Idaho will now charge doctors with a crime if they execute this procedure, regardless of reason. Ectopic pregnancies, if not terminated, can be fatal to women.
Please provide the name of this Idaho law, and the chapter and section number where it defines what an abortion is. Every reference I have found specifically exempts ectopic pregnancy and misarrange treatments.
Its probably the most important topic globally at this current moment, alongside the environment. Yang was proved right far quicker than anyone imagined.
I wish he talked more policy and explained how he thinks the Forward Party is going to fix the broken 2-party system that benefits more from NOT solving issues. Leaving abortion rights in limbo meant it could be a voter issue in every election. That turned out terribly.
@@faceplants2 I can fill in as a member of the Forward Party. His intention is to build the movement/party from the ground up instead of top-down. As such, the Forward Party's current focus is local elections not big ticket ones. Also the chief party policy positions are currently ranked choice voting, open primaries, and multi-member districts. Rank choice voting seeks to reduce the spoiler effect (also known as voting for the lesser of two evils). It allows people to vote for who they actually want, while still ensuring if their candidate isn't viable for a chance to win their vote will still be counted towards their preference of candidates. Expected impacts are reduced negative political attacks (since they lose their value in a ranked choice voting system) and initial cost both in funds/time to retrofit voting procedures/systems. Alaska currently uses this system successfully. Open primaries look to reduce the level of extremism present in both major political parties. By making the primaries of both Democrats and Republicans open to public vote by all, the candidates unacceptable to one of the camps are unlikely to achieve a nomination. This should result in more moderate candidates overall and more bipartisan agreement. This idea is common in Europe. Multi-member districts is really a stretch goal (the first two are likely to succeed, the multi-member district idea is still not quite ready for passage). The idea is that we triple the number of politicians in both the house and senate but keep the number of districts the same. Instead of districts having 1 candidate, they will have 3 each. Those 3 will be the 3 highest ranking in voting using the rank choice voting system. As such, in red districts we would expect 2 Republicans and an Independent; In blue districts we would expect 2 Democrats and an Independent; and in contested or "purple" districts, we would expect 1 Republican, 1 Democrat, and 1 Independent. This should result in a more responsive government (3 times as many folks representing each person means more availability for responses) and a political body that is more a true representation of the American people (ex: Republicans in blue districts, and Democrats in red districts would get better representation). This would also nearly kill Gerrymandering as it would lose its usefulness in a multi-member district (At best Gerrymandering could only determine who was 1st and 2nd pick, not whether a candidate is elected or not).
It turns out we didn't take the threat of AI seriously because we were worried about when it would be able to think on its own or become conscious... but what we needed to worry about was when AI would become capable enough to be usable, even if the results are often weird. And soon the results will be harder and harder to distinguish between real human results. And then we become dependent. And all that can happen before any AI starts to have a soul or something.
If you enjoy interacting with other viewers in youtube comments... I hope you are going to enjoy the future where you spend all day commenting with AI chat bots that are tailored to your personality.
You being worried about AI. 😂 What we should be worried about. Is the 1% realizing they have robots and AI so that they can get rid of the other 99% and have no problems. Fix global warming at the same time.
Exactly this idea that A.I. is going to overrun humans is crazy. People thought cars planes farming etc is all going to be done by bots is crazy. They cant even deliver a pizza
If Dems actually cared about abortion rights the way they say they do, why didn't they pass federal legislation any of the times in the last 50 years that they had control of the executive and legislative?
That's only acceptable way this ever could be done. 1) Roe v Wade was bullshit and deserved to be struck. 2) The people want legal abortion. 3) Then write and pass a goddamn law, this is a democracy! If you can't pass the law, then you can't pass the law. That's how our system works and that's exactly how it should work.
I'm a member of the Forward Party, but I'm losing faith in our ability to reform this system without some dripping red meat to hold out in front of voters.
Sadly I think the extreme brokenness of the system after 2024 will have to be the red meat to get it done, I wish the voters could be proactive enough to get it done before dire circumstances give us no choice but apparently that isn’t how most are wired but I applaud the Forward Party trying to give us an option to move a little faster with those reforms
LOVE Elissa's comment about how (ironically) right here on UA-cam, coders have absolutely designed algorithms that monetize/maximize profits based on provocative content including hate speech. They are currently not liable for their behavior.
"If I'm a conservative, God, heal me of my thoughts that liberals are the problem. If I'm a liberal, God, heal me of my thoughts that conservatives are the problem." -Marianne Williamson
“IT’S YOUR FUCKING FAULT I’M 5 MINUTES LATE!!! I THOUGHT YOU WERE MORE COMPETENT THAN A SLOW THIRD-GRADER. . FUUUUCK!!!!” - also Marianne Williamson. Allegedly.
True, but he's learned to hold back, submissively agree to a certain point, as a result of what all he's dealt with and dealing with since he entered politics. In the end that's a mentally unstable enforced way to keep getting the completely insane way. I thought that he would have made a great mayor of New York City, in every way, all of his innovative ideas, including his good management to be able to carry them out, and look what have gotten instead, the whole state of New York. Shameless dunces, corrupted to the core. That's what pleases Oligarchy Globalists psychopaths. If successful, he could have set a precedent for other important cities to follow in The USA, especially blue cities in most dire and drastic systemic need of change.
@@anaibarangan4908 I learned how deeply corrupted the NYC political system is by following Yang's mayoral run. It's crazy the amount of manipulation and favor trading that happened during that election. There is a lot of interest in keeping NYC corrupt. It's easier to buy out career politicians.
People will continue to have this endless discussion on poverty and unaffordability of housing and services but will never, EVER mention that wages have stagnated for multiple decades. Somehow that never gets mentioned, let's just ignore the fact that that corporations make ever more profit but do not reinvest any of it into their workforce
The most immediate problem with AI is that the capitalist system is not set up for handling it. That AI does a lot of work for us should be a good thing because it means in general we all have to work less. But if the AI is owned by the rich capitalists it means a few people will gain the benefits of that increased production and a lot of people will get nothing.
I worked in a call center taking inbound calls from angry customers. Bing Chat could do 99% of the calls, and abuse, I was paid to handle, based on what Ive seen it do already, given different prompts. Yang was right... its automatable today and I guarantee someones already out there working on it because right now every industry is asking themselves "how could AI save money for my business?"
Great response by Elissa Slotkin! Noa had nothing to say about everyone always screaming anti-semitism when people are just concerned for the Palestinian people 👍
Who has ever screamed antisemitism when people are just concerned for the Palestinian people, what are their names? This boring talking point about "It's not antisemitic to criticize the policies of the Israeli government" is a straw man argument. Who has ever said that?
VEEP just follow the President or sit in the corner...it's not going to be a fight in the WH. Like you sound like people want. Trump as Biden's veep = 25th Amendment each week.
It's a sensible safeguard. Harris was unpopular in the primaries but is a darling of the DNC, so they slid her into vp, knowing she could well get a free ticket to presidency. Ideally, I think veeps standing in as president should only be temporary, until someone else is fairly elected. Yang's idea is more practical though, because that vote is done in advance.
Shouldn't he get to win the next presidency simply by standing up and saying he was right about everything. Like he literally predicted the last 3 years on the campaign trail
What was he right about? He predicted that automation would cause mass unemployment, and he really thought that half of the people who lost their job because of the pandemic wouldn't get it back because of automation. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate is 3% and labor force participation is as high as it's ever been. Andrew Yang is as wrong as it is possible to be.
Would be curious to hear what others think of the "no one wants to work" idea. I have been applying to tons of jobs, and every job I apply to has like 70 to 120 applicants. Serious competition. Also, for more info.....I am applying to skilled jobs, and I feel like unskilled labor that pays poorly might be hard to fill?
It is a dichotomy. There are jobs where, like you say, have too many applicants vying for one or two spots, while others are always in shortage. There are different reasons for different jobs. For instance, in jobs I have had, the problem is the applicant pool (and HR standards minimums about who we should expect to do the job). In other places, no one wants to do hard honest work. Sometimes it is because how people get treated at both kinds of jobs!
People decided that manual labor job opportunities are many times more physically demanding and people decided after the covid lock downs those positions though many times pay well don't have overall benefits including insurance and retirement programs that support the amount of physically associated ailments that obviously come with manual labor job opportunities and so many people fell for the myth that it's better to stay home than work
@@sharonhamilton3439 People won't be king makers anymore when they only get peanuts. The Corps need labor more than laborers need jobs. We hold the power, but are just too self-interested to ever get collectively organized. UNIONS! People fell for the "right to work" myth 35 years ago.
I found her to be lacking, I don’t live in her state, so it doesn’t matter……frankly, most people that pursue politics aren’t the best or brightest anymore. We vote for the “least worst” candidate…..but the majority of them are pretty crappy.
Back in the late 70s at high school here in the UK I remember our teacher talking about computers. She said when we were at work we would see a revolution. Paperless offices, machines doing all the heavy hard physical work, machines and computers would mean we would all have lots more free time and would have better lifestyles and more money than any previous generation. It hasn’t worked out that way for many. We work longer hours just to pay our credit bills and live. In the next 15 years manual jobs such as working in warehouses, factories and driving heavy loads will all disappear as jobs. For many who don’t have a higher education the decent paid jobs will be out of reach meaning poverty and misery for many families. This is an issue that has been ignored by too many in the past and even now. We are heading for disaster if we don’t try and find a solution. As for the paperless office most seem to have more paper than ever in them 😔
Right now many intellectual jobs will start being replaced, more education isn't the answer. I work in a trade and I find myself surprised that my type of work is probably among the safest from robots. And in the long run we probably will be better off. JD Rockefeller was, inflation adjusted, probably the richest person to ever live and he never had so many of the luxuries that we take for granted today, let alone such innovations as antibiotics.
That's because the solution is UBI (which I'm surprised Yang didn't push here). If everyone has just enough money to live even without needing to work, then the idea is they can then use the extra time to do things that are more meaningful rather than just work to live. Machines and automation is supposed to be the answer. There are plenty of rich elites born into wealth that never had to do physical labor in their life, but not all of them are lazy slobs. Humans generally will be able to find things they want to do if they have time for it.
@@MinhVu-fl4nn The thing is such ideas as UBI, ( paid family leave, free health care, etc.) will require a MASSIVE shift in our political landscape as it stands today. Right now I just don't see that happening.
I had the same experience in high school except my teacher included a flying car. But none that l have heard included the greed of capitalism in the equation. We will have to embrace a more socialist out look if humanity is to survive. Other wise the gun nuts will have had the right idea all along and that's a future which is truly terrifying.
You're absolutely wrong - trade jobs are more important than ever right now. Skilled manual laborers are disappearing when we need them the most. Try finding a good carpenter, electrician, etc. it's hard and they charge a shit ton. These kind of jobs are not going away any time soon, they're just going out of fashion.
Customer Service is a huge issue with Chatbots. They still do not outperform a real person. I don't know what the stats say but I call when all options are exhausted. The last thing I want to hear is a automated voice. By the time I reach a human I'm peeved.
Most customer support workers are just automated humans anyway. They follow a rather strict step-by-step checklist based on the client's issue. People just _feel_ better talking to a real human being. But soon you'll be talking to a machine thinking it's an actual human without being able to tell the difference.
@@Raphael11001 Yes, many of us know they are scripted, but we can get past that false wall because they are human. The scripts aren't considering the reality of the issues. When you need a human, you need to solve a larger issue and the chatbots are unable to solve those unique circumstances. They may handle the no brainers but humans do a better job with the larger issues. Just watch the SNL sketches. Comedy mimics truth. The jury is out.
Slotkin was strategically put in a district and then she "moved" into the district yet spent hardly any time there before being elected. She is a perfect example of why someone should have to live in the district and state they represent for at least 10 years before running for national office. And personally, I do not think people who were in the CIA should be allowed to run for office after "leaving" the CIA. They had access to all kinds of information that can be used against citizens. I thank them for their service but serving on the national level should not be allowed.
Companies now have the possibility to move systems to AI. But very few have the money, time, knowhow, data integrity, ... to do so. Also studies show they will need to increase the number of higher level staff when the AI doesn't give the required support.
Companies don't move these things on their own most of the time, they use a consulting firm or an IT company to help them develop the right processes and migrate everything into the new system. Sometimes they'll even stick with a support plan so the IT firm can provide staff and support. So the fact that businesses don't have the knowledge themselves is irrelevant.
businesses have the mean to invest. They are simpy waiting for the entry price to be lower which comes with maturing of the technology which is on it's way.
For a little while White collar work will simply consist of people who know how to control and train the AI to do whatever job it is that it has been tasked with. Think of it like being the captain aboard a 747. Once airborne and autopilot is engaged his job is really nothing more than monitoring systems. This is the future of AI for the time being
@@TheStatisticalPizza Amazon just scrapped its AI for screening of resumes. It was screening out huge swaths of applicants because it could only extrapolate from past hirings/employee success. That almost always meant those getting jobs were males and those educated in the US.
@@schloops8473 As I said, they can try to set it up, but the problem is linking it into current systems so correct info is generated. It is not that difficult if your products are off the shelf. It's wildly complicated if your products are all made to order or are being shipped through inconsistent supply channels.
@@brasshouse9822 That's not how it worked. The VP was the first loser (came in second) of the EC vote. So wolf is correct. Under the ORIGINAL way the VP was chosen, trump would be VP right now.
@@jmeyer4321 definitely seems someone spoke to him and he WOKE up because I noticed a change as well. This particular show kinda sucked though. Not one good guest. A biased jew. A dumb democrat. A reused and nothing new tech billionaire.
Last week's episode had to be the most boring episode I've seen in three years. Not that the guests were bad, I enjoy both of them, but the topics were just not very interesting.
"I think he (Trump) is going to arrive on all these (social media) platforms and we'll all be collectively dumber for it." Andrew Yang for the obvious score!
Slotkin... people should absolutely have the freedom to monetize "extremism" or "hate." What a dangerous slippery slope. Who gets to define what is extreme or hateful? Scary stuff
Yang's comment about there needs to be a Democratic primary is exactly right on. Biden is turning back on what he promised, and even for him - he needs the practice because is a terrible public speaker and absolutely uncharismatic. He needs to prove to us he can do the job, and hear what the people want. Kudos to Marianne Williamson for stepping out first on that.
@@petercollingwood522 You may have faith in Biden and not need to see any demonstration that he can inspire Dems and beat Trump. I may even believe that as well. But that is the exact error Democrats made in 2016 that got Trump elected in the first place. So - point being, it's not all about you.
@@justgivemethetruth He doesn't need to inspire Dems. If they are so immature that they need "inspiration" to vote for President then they deserve Trump. What he has to do is convince independents that he is better than Trump. Which he did in 20 and there is no reason he can't do so based on his job performance since then.
Great episode, however on heckling Elissa is completely right that we have to respect free speech on both sides. The safety officer wasn't wrong in acknowledging that it was lawful and good for democracy.
Hope this means we get to see Andrew Yang on Club Random very soon 🥰🧢 always much more fun with more time to get into the weeds as long as you keep Bill off the topic of COVID 🥴
How many of us have gotten increasingly irate when calling customer service, smashing buttons and screaming "let me talk to a human!" I seriously doubt AI is going to replace call center workers anytime soon.
Disagree. Panels where everyone agrees with each other are boring. Only reason to like this panel is that they reaffirm what you think to make you feel better.
@@robertpolanco1973 easy there "fella" Well of course there's a long list of Democrats who I would take over Trump, including Yang, but if Biden is up to another run in 2024, I'd support him!
I never considered Yang as a legitimate candidate before. But I'm slowly changing my mind on that. I think he is thoughtful, well spoken and thinks things through before he speaks.. and that's just a few of the many things I am liking about him. I think he should run again.
Yeah you're right, he's very intelligible and cares of the people
Back in the run up to 2020, what excluded him from legitimacy in your perception? Certainly you were not alone in that. Also, did you have candidates at the time besides the guy who won who did appear legitimate? What were the factors that informed your perception?
@@brockmiller574 I'm curious on this as well. I was a big Yang supporter and it's always interesting to hear how ppl outside of my bubble perceived him
I agree.he is very intelligent and he is able to see more than one side of an issue.
Hmm, so what happened? Decided to take off your ideological blinders and decided to listen for a change? Gross. Maybe don't vote until you decide to start listening 100% of the time? Thanks in advance!
The transition from Yang talking about the millions of jobs about to disappear and the question about the hat is like something out of the Hunger Games.
Slotkin is just the kind of politician we don’t need
I actually agree, but probably for different reasons than you. She never said a true word that she thought, except showing that she was so woke that she HAD to assert her pro-Palestinians/anti-Israel into the Israel argument. As a Jewish Dem, I hate having to listen to self-hating Jews. But all that aside, every answer she gave was extremely political and CAREFUL. Too afraid that people might hate to hear what she really thinks.
@@jbjacobs9514 i hate having to listen to israeli actresses blindly support a military dictatorship that kills innocent civilians
@@jbjacobs9514 Ah that's an interesting take, with the criticism of her pro Palestinian line. I'm curious how ppl feel about Slotkin on here, especially given that she's now running for the Senate
OP (Rick), what was your reason for not liking Slotkin?
She's awful, 100 % political.
Thanks for having Yang on the show, Bill.
I think Yang is a great guy, eloquent speaker, highly educated and caring person!
He also shoots whipped cream inside mouths of men.
i'd rather have yin.
He's a waste of everyone's time. Just hot air searching for an intelligent thought.
#YangGang
That lady at the Oscars is problematic of a bigger problem. People simply not caring about their fellow citizens. It's minor for the moment, but it's a major problem across the country.
Fellow Earthlings*
Animals should also be in our circle of compassion. ❤️
I thought the same exact thing. I'll bet money they didn't want to touch this subject because of her skin color. End of story...
I agree, society is in the toilet and too many people don't care about being decent.
I call it public behavior, and that is sorely lacking, at least where I live and work every day.
They should have told that selfish twat either take the head piece off or get the fuck out of the theater
No one is willing to say plainly that it was obviously rude for that lady to wear that big dress at the Oscars.
Yeah thats totally gross. That lady knew that she was going to block others view. It shows that she just only thinks about herself.
Sure, but to be mocked across the world. Might be a bit much.
@@mokilokenot enough you mean
Slotkin's idea was the best: make the stupid hat collapsible.
It clearly was. I would say inconsiderate is an even more accurate word. However I agree with Noa that it also wasn't worth using as a question on Overtime.
I like Andrew Yang. He studies a topic before he speaks of it. In my opinion he would be a good senator. I would vote for him and I'm a registered Republican.
Even for ubi?
@@joetatoesniff9525 UBI is a net benefit for the economy.
@JoetatoeSniff because corporate bailouts and subsidies are so much different right? 🙄
Universal income is socialism
lol.. not voting for pro censorship, sorry
Andrew is great. He has always great comments.
Overtime is too short. Needs 15mins
Indeed. Too bad their corporate daddy said no.
@@divinedemonj It was this short before CNN started airing it.
Sheeiit, it needs to be a full hour! Get deeper in to the topics.
@@dwaynehendricks7842
sometimes the initial interview segment needs to be one hour.
America needs to see more of Andrew Yang. Then the media and CAN’T dismiss him next time he runs.
The more they see him, the less they like him.
@@RasTona_ Like compared to whom? Trump? Biden? You must be that silly to believe that nonsense!
@@robertpolanco1973 I'm not gonna vote for either. He's not far from them either. Just bc I don't like Biden and Trump, It doesn't mean I'm gonna vote for their love child. It's this mind set that got us in this mess. We have made it so easy for any candidate to get elected as long as they hate someone we hate. push comes to shove, Yang is voting for himself and the democrats.
@@RasTona_ Yang is NOT a Democrat in any way because he is more of a third-party alternative! Furthermore, EVERY politician in this country votes for himself/herself anyway for many decades, too!
@@robertpolanco1973 He's NOT a democrat in anyway?? He ran on their ticket, and on the same episode he was pleading with biden to give other democrats like himself a chance. "Third party" means different from party 1 and party2. There's no such thing as a "more of a third party". Just come-out and say " we are 3rd party, this is our plan........"
but thanks for admitting Yang is all about himself just like other politicians. So why do we need more of just like the other politicians?
That actress at the Oscar's is a good representation of America today. Ignorance is king and calling it out gets you canceled and labeled.
What I wanted to ask is what if they put another person of color with an even more broadly feathered and fanned out elaborate outfit in front of her?????
Ignorance seems to be trying to take over common sense,shows how stupid a lot of people really are.
@@robertmichalscheck3072 - I agree with you. Most people in America are either stupid or don't care about the country.
My favorite sign at a WWE show is "THE PEOPLE BEHIND ME CAN'T SEE".
israel is not a legitimate country.
Andrew is very underrated and he has humility and authenticity in his experience in life that very few have
Andrew yang stands for nothing
@@anthonyesposito7 yeah he does! He tells both sides to fuck off!!
Why so afraid for them to say the actress was rude and self centre? Yes more important things to discuss but this could have been simply.
That Noah Tishby lady is the self centered Hollywood elite that people always talk about.
Andrew Yang is always ahead of the time and it shows with how dull the crowd is when he speaks
Exactly
Thevwomen were just negating all his ideas to look smart or try to
Never heard Elissa Slotkin speak before but I don't care for her much. Also, I love Noa Tishby saying thank you after 2 people clap lol
Yang is always a delightful guest. This man should be on a perpetual podcast tour.
Andrew needs to work on spicing up his own podcast again but I know he has been too busy. 😕 Did you know that a #YangGang meme is how we got Ke Huy Kwon back into acting with Everything Everywhere All at Once?
Overworked Land surveyor here, My career is one of those Jobs that is absolutely critical to all construction and mapping services. 15 years Experience and I am done, I found myself working harder as i got older and its not because I am aging in reverse. My company could not find any hires and the ones they do find are worthless. I had to go around fixing everything they did, taking time out of my own work.
We were literally operating crews messing everything up and the old crews that fix all those mistakes. Forced to work 6 day work weeks and 10 hour days, my father passed away without hardly seeing me because of my work schedule. Calling me jaded is a understatement.
I've heard this sort of thing from company owners too like my HVAC guy and my mechanic. Can't get good people.
If you're in such high demand then push back against the "Man". I'm a network engineer and we're in much the same predicament. The schools churn out discombobulated young people with poor social skills who can't/won't do the job. More than half of them leave the field in the first two years. The rest of us who can do this get to call the shots. I hand pick my clients and say "No" all the time. There is a labor shortage in this country that's only getting worse.
Could you take on less Jobs?
I don't know what kind of house you have, or car you drive - but less is sometimes more ❤
If what you state is true then you should absolutely bring it up to your managers and bosses. Tell them about the extra work you need to put in. Do NOT work for free quietly and complain on the side. Seriously from what youve said it sounds like you offer a lot more to the company and deserve to be paid more.
People don’t need to use “literally” so much
Some companies laying of 40% of their workforce is pretty crazy. I’m surprised that’s not a bigger talking point.
It will be when the elections come up. Then it will be "Biden's fault" for not stopping AI from advancing or some shit. People always find the way to blame the president, even though it's the corporations that obviously run the show.
Every time I listen to Andrew Yang I'm really impressed. I wish his Forward party luck as America could really benefit from a healthy 3rd political party. BTW most democracies have multiple political parties that offers more choice and helps reduce that bipartisan tribal edge that now consumes America. My family are duel citizen, Canadian and American and I've always wondered why the American public tolerate having just two political parties while they can go to a Walmart and choose 8 different kinds of Yogurt at the Grocery store.
You mean 4th party
I'm not sure about every democratic country, or Canada for that matter. But seems to me there's only 2 parties in the UK. Labor and Tories. The only ones who seem to get power. The US has more than 2 parties, but only the 2 major parties hold the power. Same thing no?
We could use the five to seven we already have operating covertly within the two dominant..oh wait one with two side 🙄
All those choices make us feel like we have freedoms and choice. The left and right are thugs who will do ANYTHING to hold onto that power SMH 😔
Maybe in 2027, the country and world is going through too much shit right now, a second term for Biden means he comes with experience and we don't need someone coming in with a learning curve right now. Let Biden also continue steering the country to the left more.
Great comments on all issues. I love how Andrew Yang is always looking forward to the consequences of technology advances.
Yang has been warning us for years.
You’re a simple man.
Yang is an inspiration. Would love to see him have some political power. Yang gang.
@@mokiloke yangs wangs
Because he's a rich guy who would benefit from automation. I doubt anyone in his immediate family will lose a job to a machine so of course he's ok with it.
Great show as always Bill, sincere thanks for your work and for your terrific sense of humor.
Yepper, Bill's show is better than ever. Enjoy his Club podcast also. Can't wait to see his standup, selling out fast.
Yang understands what’s really happening.
Not really. He's just gaslighting everyone for grift as per his usual tactic. He's no genius.
@@noire.blackheart He does not rely on demonization, and gets into some practical world detail. Also he doesn't cater to the lowest impulses.
@@benjamingruder4875what do you mean? He just catered to the lowest impulses of the audience in this video.
@@vinegarpisser2992 He did not target a group to hate. That would have been catering the lowest impulses.
@@noire.blackheart Where did he gaslight anyone? CS jobs will be the first to fall. I got laid off from a CS job last year. We got replaced by a chat bot.
Everytime I see Yang come back to the public spotlight, he is still consistently addressing the actual REAL issues in America. He was right about everything and points out we're wasting time everyday fighting battles between extreme Democrats and Republicans and getting further divided and further from solving our problems more effectively. Someone please get this awesome man in office! 🙌
As lil Andy yang ATTACKS " get rid of Trump" yet Yang is eatin up with abscessed TDS...Attacking and creating the great divide towards HONEST AMERICANS that support the finest POTUS ever in the history of the USA. T R U M P ..as an independent I voted for Hillary and Obama... HUGEE mistake.. someday perhaps you will see the light ..Go WOKE Go Broke !
Rep Slotkin has a few good points, but she is completely wrong about a third party. A third party would NOT be an extreme party; it would be the moderates from both parties. We all are tried of the extremes in BOTH parties. We also have a new appreciation for Andrew Yang.
Agreed
Americans work in call centers??? Every time I call for customer service I get somebody from a country that I can't understand what they're saying. Most are from India.
And they are named David or Peter. LOL.
Discover Card has their call center in Utah.
There are, but to get to one of them a caller must spend close to ten minutes in the maze that is the automated system.
"Every time I call for customer service I get somebody from a country that I can't understand"
Yupp, that is the US in a nutshell
True. In my job in IT I've had to place a lot of calls to call centers over the last 20 or so years. Used to be you would get a majority of American's on the other end of the line. In the last 8 or so years I can't remember the last time I spoke to an American. Vast majority are Indian with a smattering of Phillipinos.
As an attorney and as a citizen I was appalled and annoyed at most of Elissa’s answers and her commitment to avoiding the issue by saying “I don’t know about that.” Andrew and, increasingly Bill, are very reasonable and down to earth.
Classic isn't it?
Couldn't agree more. It's strange, but I haven't been put off by a guest this much in quite some time.
That’s how you campaign for the right. I am immigrant, I pass at a lady saying college is for teacher people to be good . Ugh, my parents were farm workers, they sent me to law school. College here is condescending with working class people
Yea, I thought how did you get elected, you seem to know very little?
@@anneb889 Explain 45, he was biggest con and still worshipped. At least she was sincere.
I like Andrew Yang a lot.
As a person, for sure.
We need the Freedom Dividend.
would love a chance to vote for him in the primary, and even if he doesnt win, i may end up writing his name in anyway. Im getting tired of going with the worse choice because theyre more popular.
Shame that ChatGPT got glossed over. AI is a HUGE threat and also an extremely important tool we’ll want to develop and Yang could have directly connected it to UBI which we all will probably need.
As a programmer these discussions about "AI" are killing me - ChatGPT and other LLM's are not even remotely close to AGI, we need to be clearer about what we're discussing because otherwise it's prone to misinterpretation or exploitation. If you start off the discussion talking about "AI" I just instantly assume you have no idea what you're talking about.
ChatGPT sucks. It literally did basic addition wrong and passed it off like there wasnt any error. Dumb af
Please explain more. I'm a novice and I'm interested in what you're saying.
@@hew195050 What most people are now calling "AI" is really just an extremely large language model which performs inference calculations. It's just extremely fine-tuned by humans to produce what we would expect. It's actually kind of scary how well some of this has worked, like a lot of us don't really understand why training it on certain datasets has worked so well.
Totally, it’s the cringiest thing listening to an noob talk about GPT
Most people think of a strong AI when talking about AIs, however, any system that can use pattern recognition in order to generate new, topic relevant content, can be considered an AI.
Moreover, defining AI aside, chatGPT has a major influence on the Junior developer job market. Sadly it is a problem, and as these technology and others like it continue to develop, it will effect more and more people.
Pro life is a religious belief. Prove to me that it’s not a violation of separation of church (beliefs) and state! Forcing a religious belief on the country is a flat out violation of the separation of church and state!
yes .. don't force your stuff on me ....
“Caring about human life is a religious belief. How dare you make murder illegal!” I get that it’s not that simple, but everything about how we treat people comes back to our fundamental beliefs about the world (whether religious or humanist or whatever other term that gets at the basic philosophy you live your life based on). There are atheists that oppose abortion. My opposition of third-trimester and hesitancy about second-trimester abortion comes from my psychology classes where we talked about how fetuses do encode memory in the womb (the closest standard we have to personhood, unless you are going to claim that the average baby does not achieve personhood until 2 years of age and some people with various disabilities never reach personhood, both ideas that I reject, largely because of my religion).
So parents can kill their children? Why not? They aren't adults yet. Without using morals, explain.
Wow talk about going over the cliff with extreme conclusions! Wow!
@@marvinmartin4692 extreme by what measure? Roman father's could kill their underaged kids. That was only 1500 years ago. Our government is in part based on Rome. What determines ethics? If culture promotes an ideal how is it wrong?
Andrew yang is great - very bright bloke
As a person that has recently setup a call center, i agree they are getting cut. After covid they cut back 80% and I had to pack up and move a lot of that same equipment.
The problem we have with the job market and the labor force is that we have a ton of open jobs that pay crap and treat workers like garbage, but companies are unwilling to change so they just claim "nobody wants to work"
Then we have many open jobs for skilled workers, but there's a shortage of those workers because nobody has those skills. We can blame the education system, but we also need to blame companies because they won't train or groom anyone. They expect someone to walk in and have little to no onboarding and just get right to it.
Then finally, we have lots of jobs out there open, people could do them, they pay well, but companies have these horrendously broken recruiting systems that drag things out forever and ever to actually finally hire somebody, and then they come in to a toxic workplace and want to leave very quickly.
The reality is that too many companies had it too good when we had an overabundance of people and a shortage of jobs. It's sad even that some companies want to go back to that. The writing was on the wall after the pandemic, but companies are just living in denial and still claiming that "culture" and "in-person collaboration" are the big things, when they are not. They also still won't pay a living wage that somebody in those vicinities can live on. That, or they won't let these people be remote and go live someplace where they can afford to live on that salary.
So now they want to bring in AI and just replace more people. What's going to happen when now you have a plethora of population unable to afford to buy anything?
I guarantee those same companies are then going to be lobbying the government to set up socialist programs and pay these companies taxpayer money to basically give out their goods or services.
well said mr alex !! now if only our 'leaders' (besides bernie) will understand that and find ways to make it better ..
@@MrVandj1 but they do get it !! large 'donation's' to stay in power come on a regular basis ..
Spot on!
👏👏👏👏
@@direwolf6234 I'm so sick of Bernie sanders supporters I could puke.
The same procedure is used by an OB/GYN to treat an ectopic pregnancy as a doctor would use to provide an elective abortion...and states like Idaho will now charge doctors with a crime if they execute this procedure, regardless of reason. Ectopic pregnancies, if not terminated, can be fatal to women.
Please provide the name of this Idaho law, and the chapter and section number where it defines what an abortion is. Every reference I have found specifically exempts ectopic pregnancy and misarrange treatments.
Andrew Yang for president.
"I'm into breathe!" 🤣 Masterfully played sir! You don't want to get pulled into that religious quicksand.
"Especially inhaling."
Andrew Yang is very reasonable.
Wow it’s like you shouldn’t be commenting or voting
Yeah I thought he had some ideas before, now he just sounds crazy
His panel wasn't my favorite people
I like him a lot! I actually supported him in the Iowa Caucasus this previous election
Totally 💯
Rank Choice Voting.
Glad to hear Yang is back to talking about his bread and butter. Automation versus human employment. 🤓
Its probably the most important topic globally at this current moment, alongside the environment. Yang was proved right far quicker than anyone imagined.
I wish he talked more policy and explained how he thinks the Forward Party is going to fix the broken 2-party system that benefits more from NOT solving issues. Leaving abortion rights in limbo meant it could be a voter issue in every election. That turned out terribly.
@@faceplants2 I can fill in as a member of the Forward Party. His intention is to build the movement/party from the ground up instead of top-down. As such, the Forward Party's current focus is local elections not big ticket ones. Also the chief party policy positions are currently ranked choice voting, open primaries, and multi-member districts.
Rank choice voting seeks to reduce the spoiler effect (also known as voting for the lesser of two evils). It allows people to vote for who they actually want, while still ensuring if their candidate isn't viable for a chance to win their vote will still be counted towards their preference of candidates. Expected impacts are reduced negative political attacks (since they lose their value in a ranked choice voting system) and initial cost both in funds/time to retrofit voting procedures/systems. Alaska currently uses this system successfully.
Open primaries look to reduce the level of extremism present in both major political parties. By making the primaries of both Democrats and Republicans open to public vote by all, the candidates unacceptable to one of the camps are unlikely to achieve a nomination. This should result in more moderate candidates overall and more bipartisan agreement. This idea is common in Europe.
Multi-member districts is really a stretch goal (the first two are likely to succeed, the multi-member district idea is still not quite ready for passage). The idea is that we triple the number of politicians in both the house and senate but keep the number of districts the same. Instead of districts having 1 candidate, they will have 3 each. Those 3 will be the 3 highest ranking in voting using the rank choice voting system. As such, in red districts we would expect 2 Republicans and an Independent; In blue districts we would expect 2 Democrats and an Independent; and in contested or "purple" districts, we would expect 1 Republican, 1 Democrat, and 1 Independent. This should result in a more responsive government (3 times as many folks representing each person means more availability for responses) and a political body that is more a true representation of the American people (ex: Republicans in blue districts, and Democrats in red districts would get better representation). This would also nearly kill Gerrymandering as it would lose its usefulness in a multi-member district (At best Gerrymandering could only determine who was 1st and 2nd pick, not whether a candidate is elected or not).
It wasn’t right for her to block their view. She should have taken it off. Just out of good manners. I thought it was rude.
It turns out we didn't take the threat of AI seriously because we were worried about when it would be able to think on its own or become conscious... but what we needed to worry about was when AI would become capable enough to be usable, even if the results are often weird. And soon the results will be harder and harder to distinguish between real human results. And then we become dependent. And all that can happen before any AI starts to have a soul or something.
If you enjoy interacting with other viewers in youtube comments... I hope you are going to enjoy the future where you spend all day commenting with AI chat bots that are tailored to your personality.
You being worried about AI. 😂 What we should be worried about. Is the 1% realizing they have robots and AI so that they can get rid of the other 99% and have no problems. Fix global warming at the same time.
@@franklin9400 AI is going to destroy art and culture. Humanity will become pure consumers, producing nothing.
@Go Away The 1% are going to build a giant underground city to ride out. When they wipe out the "annoying" 99%. Not a future of AI chat bots.
Exactly this idea that A.I. is going to overrun humans is crazy. People thought cars planes farming etc is all going to be done by bots is crazy. They cant even deliver a pizza
Still Yang Gang!
Yanggang4life
#YangGang 🤟🏻
The algorithm case before the supreme court is the root issue for a lot of problems in the US. It should be more front & center.
If Dems actually cared about abortion rights the way they say they do, why didn't they pass federal legislation any of the times in the last 50 years that they had control of the executive and legislative?
They obviously don't care like republicans don't care about Obamacare.
That's only acceptable way this ever could be done.
1) Roe v Wade was bullshit and deserved to be struck.
2) The people want legal abortion.
3) Then write and pass a goddamn law, this is a democracy!
If you can't pass the law, then you can't pass the law. That's how our system works and that's exactly how it should work.
I'm a member of the Forward Party, but I'm losing faith in our ability to reform this system without some dripping red meat to hold out in front of voters.
UBI used to be that meat...Yang hasn't really touted it in a long time.
@@szahmad2416 I agree he has to talk about the benefits of his ubi plan again
@@szahmad2416 cause its a silly idea
Sadly I think the extreme brokenness of the system after 2024 will have to be the red meat to get it done, I wish the voters could be proactive enough to get it done before dire circumstances give us no choice but apparently that isn’t how most are wired but I applaud the Forward Party trying to give us an option to move a little faster with those reforms
@@Dan16673 OK, burger-man.
The jobs she is speaking about are 10/hr with bad schedules . People don’t want to have that job.
LOVE Elissa's comment about how (ironically) right here on UA-cam, coders have absolutely designed algorithms that monetize/maximize profits based on provocative content including hate speech. They are currently not liable for their behavior.
Yeah that’s the thread to pull on for the right and left to find common ground. Big tech needs accountability, not protection.
"If I'm a conservative, God,
heal me of my thoughts
that liberals are the problem.
If I'm a liberal, God, heal me
of my thoughts that
conservatives are the problem."
-Marianne Williamson
“IT’S YOUR FUCKING FAULT I’M 5 MINUTES LATE!!! I THOUGHT YOU WERE MORE COMPETENT THAN A SLOW THIRD-GRADER. . FUUUUCK!!!!”
- also Marianne Williamson. Allegedly.
Yang is on a different level than these airheads.
Sexist. Why call the women airheads? Yang talks in bumper stickers.
True, but he's learned to hold back, submissively agree to a certain point, as a result of what all he's dealt with and dealing with since he entered politics. In the end that's a mentally unstable enforced way to keep getting the completely insane way. I thought that he would have made a great mayor of New York City, in every way, all of his innovative ideas, including his good management to be able to carry them out, and look what have gotten instead, the whole state of New York. Shameless dunces, corrupted to the core. That's what pleases Oligarchy Globalists psychopaths. If successful, he could have set a precedent for other important cities to follow in The USA, especially blue cities in most dire and drastic systemic need of change.
@@anaibarangan4908 I learned how deeply corrupted the NYC political system is by following Yang's mayoral run. It's crazy the amount of manipulation and favor trading that happened during that election. There is a lot of interest in keeping NYC corrupt. It's easier to buy out career politicians.
Andrew Yang should run again with the slogan "I told you so"
People will continue to have this endless discussion on poverty and unaffordability of housing and services but will never, EVER mention that wages have stagnated for multiple decades. Somehow that never gets mentioned, let's just ignore the fact that that corporations make ever more profit but do not reinvest any of it into their workforce
The most immediate problem with AI is that the capitalist system is not set up for handling it. That AI does a lot of work for us should be a good thing because it means in general we all have to work less. But if the AI is owned by the rich capitalists it means a few people will gain the benefits of that increased production and a lot of people will get nothing.
It's no different than any other productivity improvement. If the market is competitive then the value of those mostly go to consumers.
@@ISpitHotFiyaa Except that it isn't competitive because capitalism always tends toward monopolization.
@@SolidAir54321 Well then that's the real problem. We should do something about that rather than worry about AI.
At the 9-minute mark Slotkin sounds like she is against the 1st Amendment. Very troubling.
Because she is.
Democrats are pro censorship by using government agencies colluding with social media platforms to suppress free speech
Very troubling and she just lost my vote. I was kind of sick of her anyway.
I really like Andrew Yang, so glad to see him on here
Andrew Yang hits on every point👏🏾😎🤙🏾
Sorry but even putting bots in control of responses when customers are pissed abt a sky high bill is not going to work.
but it will, people will be yelling at bots, bots will get hurt feelings and endlife on earth....pretty much what's happening here on YT.
I worked in a call center taking inbound calls from angry customers. Bing Chat could do 99% of the calls, and abuse, I was paid to handle, based on what Ive seen it do already, given different prompts. Yang was right... its automatable today and I guarantee someones already out there working on it because right now every industry is asking themselves "how could AI save money for my business?"
If the businesses can save money, they'll do it. They don't care about their customers
Putting a fat psychological and emotional basket case on that call to promptly have a nervous breakdown is a better option?
@@julessaviour5931 Other way around. If the customers can save money, they'll do it. They don't care about the workers.
Great response by Elissa Slotkin! Noa had nothing to say about everyone always screaming anti-semitism when people are just concerned for the Palestinian people 👍
Who has ever screamed antisemitism when people are just concerned for the Palestinian people, what are their names?
This boring talking point about
"It's not antisemitic to criticize the policies of the Israeli government" is a straw man argument. Who has ever said that?
Not everyone believes in Jesus Christ, nor do we feel " less than" because we don't kneel and pray to a statue....
Okay?
What we need is an organization called D.R.A.G. - Disciples Reading Apostolic Gospel. This way it’s literally Drag Story Hour.
Love that idea of a primary for veep or whomever comes in 2nd. Would avoid getting terrible veeps in most cases
VEEP just follow the President or sit in the corner...it's not going to be a fight in the WH. Like you sound like people want. Trump as Biden's veep = 25th Amendment each week.
Trump?
It's a sensible safeguard. Harris was unpopular in the primaries but is a darling of the DNC, so they slid her into vp, knowing she could well get a free ticket to presidency.
Ideally, I think veeps standing in as president should only be temporary, until someone else is fairly elected. Yang's idea is more practical though, because that vote is done in advance.
@@myrtleheatherfield as Nash said the choice is the presidential candidate's and you judge their choice by voting for the candidate or not.
@@myrtleheatherfield nailed it. They shoved Harris dos our throats, just like with Hillary.
Shouldn't he get to win the next presidency simply by standing up and saying he was right about everything. Like he literally predicted the last 3 years on the campaign trail
We are too glazed over to ever vote for someone honest who really wants thing to get better.
Who is he?
@@svscared yang.
What was he right about? He predicted that automation would cause mass unemployment, and he really thought that half of the people who lost their job because of the pandemic wouldn't get it back because of automation. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate is 3% and labor force participation is as high as it's ever been. Andrew Yang is as wrong as it is possible to be.
Who remembers Oliver Stone’s movie advert where he held up the smart phone and said this will be the end of us?
Would be curious to hear what others think of the "no one wants to work" idea. I have been applying to tons of jobs, and every job I apply to has like 70 to 120 applicants. Serious competition.
Also, for more info.....I am applying to skilled jobs, and I feel like unskilled labor that pays poorly might be hard to fill?
It is a dichotomy. There are jobs where, like you say, have too many applicants vying for one or two spots, while others are always in shortage. There are different reasons for different jobs. For instance, in jobs I have had, the problem is the applicant pool (and HR standards minimums about who we should expect to do the job). In other places, no one wants to do hard honest work. Sometimes it is because how people get treated at both kinds of jobs!
Good overtime conversation.
it was actually trash, the topics were boring and the commentary was surface level banal bs.
Slotkin is ignoring the fact that most of the jobs that aren't getting filled is bc the jobs suck and the pay is worse.
People decided that manual labor job opportunities are many times more physically demanding and people decided after the covid lock downs those positions though many times pay well don't have overall benefits including insurance and retirement programs that support the amount of physically associated ailments that obviously come with manual labor job opportunities and so many people fell for the myth that it's better to stay home than work
@@sharonhamilton3439 People won't be king makers anymore when they only get peanuts. The Corps need labor more than laborers need jobs. We hold the power, but are just too self-interested to ever get collectively organized. UNIONS! People fell for the "right to work" myth 35 years ago.
Vice President is often not who the president thinks is the best option it's political negotiations behind the scenes.
Like Obama really thought Biden was the best choice. He needed an old white man.
If Andrew Yang is on, I'm watching. Let's hear more from Yang please.
"...soon to be Senator..." Indeed, Representative Slotkin MUST win just to give her party a fighting chance to retain its majority come '25 and '26.
I found her to be lacking, I don’t live in her state, so it doesn’t matter……frankly, most people that pursue politics aren’t the best or brightest anymore. We vote for the “least worst” candidate…..but the majority of them are pretty crappy.
Back in the late 70s at high school here in the UK I remember our teacher talking about computers.
She said when we were at work we would see a revolution.
Paperless offices, machines doing all the heavy hard physical work, machines and computers would mean we would all have lots more free time and would have better lifestyles and more money than any previous generation.
It hasn’t worked out that way for many.
We work longer hours just to pay our credit bills and live.
In the next 15 years manual jobs such as working in warehouses, factories and driving heavy loads will all disappear as jobs.
For many who don’t have a higher education the decent paid jobs will be out of reach meaning poverty and misery for many families.
This is an issue that has been ignored by too many in the past and even now.
We are heading for disaster if we don’t try and find a solution.
As for the paperless office most seem to have more paper than ever in them 😔
Right now many intellectual jobs will start being replaced, more education isn't the answer. I work in a trade and I find myself surprised that my type of work is probably among the safest from robots.
And in the long run we probably will be better off. JD Rockefeller was, inflation adjusted, probably the richest person to ever live and he never had so many of the luxuries that we take for granted today, let alone such innovations as antibiotics.
That's because the solution is UBI (which I'm surprised Yang didn't push here). If everyone has just enough money to live even without needing to work, then the idea is they can then use the extra time to do things that are more meaningful rather than just work to live. Machines and automation is supposed to be the answer. There are plenty of rich elites born into wealth that never had to do physical labor in their life, but not all of them are lazy slobs. Humans generally will be able to find things they want to do if they have time for it.
@@MinhVu-fl4nn The thing is such ideas as UBI, ( paid family leave, free health care, etc.) will require a MASSIVE shift in our political landscape as it stands today. Right now I just don't see that happening.
I had the same experience in high school except my teacher included a flying car. But none that l have heard included the greed of capitalism in the equation. We will have to embrace a more socialist out look if humanity is to survive. Other wise the gun nuts will have had the right idea all along and that's a future which is truly terrifying.
You're absolutely wrong - trade jobs are more important than ever right now. Skilled manual laborers are disappearing when we need them the most. Try finding a good carpenter, electrician, etc. it's hard and they charge a shit ton. These kind of jobs are not going away any time soon, they're just going out of fashion.
The problem with regulating monetization of "hate" content is that it is nearly impossible to agree on how to define hate.
Customer Service is a huge issue with Chatbots. They still do not outperform a real person. I don't know what the stats say but I call when all options are exhausted. The last thing I want to hear is a automated voice. By the time I reach a human I'm peeved.
Customer service is disgusting now. Verizon is a nightmare. I'm sure they hope people give up.
Most customer support workers are just automated humans anyway. They follow a rather strict step-by-step checklist based on the client's issue. People just _feel_ better talking to a real human being. But soon you'll be talking to a machine thinking it's an actual human without being able to tell the difference.
@@Raphael11001 Yes, many of us know they are scripted, but we can get past that false wall because they are human. The scripts aren't considering the reality of the issues. When you need a human, you need to solve a larger issue and the chatbots are unable to solve those unique circumstances. They may handle the no brainers but humans do a better job with the larger issues. Just watch the SNL sketches. Comedy mimics truth. The jury is out.
I really like Slotkin and Yang. Hope they succeed in politics
You wouldn't like Slotkin if you live in Michigan
She was hugely impressive here. Articulate and with real solutions based approach
Slotkin was strategically put in a district and then she "moved" into the district yet spent hardly any time there before being elected. She is a perfect example of why someone should have to live in the district and state they represent for at least 10 years before running for national office. And personally, I do not think people who were in the CIA should be allowed to run for office after "leaving" the CIA. They had access to all kinds of information that can be used against citizens. I thank them for their service but serving on the national level should not be allowed.
@@scsmith4604 True
Slotkin was atrocious. She could even answer a question. Most of what she said was pandering.
Companies now have the possibility to move systems to AI. But very few have the money, time, knowhow, data integrity, ... to do so. Also studies show they will need to increase the number of higher level staff when the AI doesn't give the required support.
Companies don't move these things on their own most of the time, they use a consulting firm or an IT company to help them develop the right processes and migrate everything into the new system. Sometimes they'll even stick with a support plan so the IT firm can provide staff and support.
So the fact that businesses don't have the knowledge themselves is irrelevant.
businesses have the mean to invest. They are simpy waiting for the entry price to be lower which comes with maturing of the technology which is on it's way.
For a little while White collar work will simply consist of people who know how to control and train the AI to do whatever job it is that it has been tasked with. Think of it like being the captain aboard a 747. Once airborne and autopilot is engaged his job is really nothing more than monitoring systems. This is the future of AI for the time being
@@TheStatisticalPizza Amazon just scrapped its AI for screening of resumes. It was screening out huge swaths of applicants because it could only extrapolate from past hirings/employee success. That almost always meant those getting jobs were males and those educated in the US.
@@schloops8473 As I said, they can try to set it up, but the problem is linking it into current systems so correct info is generated. It is not that difficult if your products are off the shelf. It's wildly complicated if your products are all made to order or are being shipped through inconsistent supply channels.
That was one of the best 'Overtime(s)'.
I'd like to hear Larry David's take on the big dress.
Our Supreme Court resembles something out of the 18th Century
Good because the idea is a really from the ancient world. Glad we made it look young and hip.
Yes, because of all the Jews, women, blacks and Latins on the 18th Century Supreme Court.
@@silencemeviolateme6076 wait until there are religious police like in Iran. Ass-backwards the USA
The answer to the Oscar question, who actually watches the Oscar/award shows.
I remember how excited Yang was when Kamala was appointed VP. 🤮
It would actually be a good idea to make the runner up be VP.
what runner up ?? then trump would be VP ??
@@direwolf6234 no, the leading democrat behind Biden. I believe that would have been Bernie.
@@brasshouse9822 ok got it ... however few would run knowing they's be VP .. might as well stay as a senator or governor
@@brasshouse9822 That's not how it worked. The VP was the first loser (came in second) of the EC vote. So wolf is correct. Under the ORIGINAL way the VP was chosen, trump would be VP right now.
@@direwolf6234 Brass gave you incorrect information. Whatever you "got" from him, I hope a shot of penicillin clears it up.
yang is awesome, slotkin seems woke-friendly and unintuitive
Andrew Yang !!
Cool !
What Slotkin’s “pro-life” constituent said about abortion, is the definition of pro-choice.
Which is why republican messaging is pro-life vs pro-abortion.
Democrats need to frame pro-life as anti-choice.
It's been a while since I enjoyed an episode of Maher this much!
@@madisynissaquah243 excuse me? No, it is certainly not.
Bill has come off his 'high horse' the past couple weeks - his 'get off my lawn you woke people' was becoming wearisome, at least to me.
@@jmeyer4321 definitely seems someone spoke to him and he WOKE up because I noticed a change as well. This particular show kinda sucked though. Not one good guest. A biased jew. A dumb democrat. A reused and nothing new tech billionaire.
You mean you didn't like Brand machine gunning half truths over Heilman?
Last week's episode had to be the most boring episode I've seen in three years. Not that the guests were bad, I enjoy both of them, but the topics were just not very interesting.
"I think he (Trump) is going to arrive on all these (social media) platforms and we'll all be collectively dumber for it." Andrew Yang for the obvious score!
Andrew Yang is the perfect person to speak about dumbing down the electorate since he is an integral part of the process.
Slotkin... people should absolutely have the freedom to monetize "extremism" or "hate." What a dangerous slippery slope. Who gets to define what is extreme or hateful? Scary stuff
I hate what cnn has done to these overtimes
Two examples of strong, intelligent, articulate women!!
#electwomen
Absurd comment.
Yang's comment about there needs to be a Democratic primary is exactly right on.
Biden is turning back on what he promised, and even for him - he needs the practice
because is a terrible public speaker and absolutely uncharismatic. He needs to
prove to us he can do the job, and hear what the people want.
Kudos to Marianne Williamson for stepping out first on that.
He's done it since he beat Trump. What exactly do you expect him to need to prove?
@@petercollingwood522
You may have faith in Biden and not need to see any demonstration that he can inspire Dems and beat Trump.
I may even believe that as well.
But that is the exact error Democrats made in 2016 that got Trump elected in the first place.
So - point being, it's not all about you.
@@justgivemethetruth He doesn't need to inspire Dems. If they are so immature that they need "inspiration" to vote for President then they deserve Trump. What he has to do is convince independents that he is better than Trump. Which he did in 20 and there is no reason he can't do so based on his job performance since then.
@@petercollingwood522
Try to understand how people might not be happy with the idea that it is all about how you feel. Self-centered p5.
Many people didn't vote FOR Biden, but voted AGAINST Trump.
2:58: "I just read the questions" = Soooo, sounds like Bill's job is replaceable too?!?!!!!!
Great episode, however on heckling Elissa is completely right that we have to respect free speech on both sides. The safety officer wasn't wrong in acknowledging that it was lawful and good for democracy.
It's past the time to vote out the Uniparty/Duopoly
Hope this means we get to see Andrew Yang on Club Random very soon 🥰🧢 always much more fun with more time to get into the weeds as long as you keep Bill off the topic of COVID 🥴
AH...FREEDOM OF SPEECH ...as long as you accept social limitations of INTENT
and the penalty is a dirty look with no apology
#SILENCEISGOLDEN
Good discussions 👏🏾
Yang should be president
Of every country!!!
in a perfect world. people are too stupid to vote for him.
Yang is the Yin to my Yang.
How sad for you
@@pams3747 It's sad that Yang is my yin? Or that yin is my yang?
:p
@Insert Name Here either/or
How many of us have gotten increasingly irate when calling customer service, smashing buttons and screaming "let me talk to a human!" I seriously doubt AI is going to replace call center workers anytime soon.
If you don’t answer the questions properly, the robot will give up and send you to a human.😊
They don't care if we don't like it. They don't want us calling them anyway and hope we give up.
Excellent conversation!
Good panel this week.
meh
Disagree. Panels where everyone agrees with each other are boring. Only reason to like this panel is that they reaffirm what you think to make you feel better.
@@MrWookie1981 Plus we can't under-rate the general "creepiness and unease" of Yang on camera.
@@ryansullivan5575 Really? Like compared to whom? Trump? Biden? You must be that crazy to criticize Yang with a pathetic assumption on your part!
@@robertpolanco1973 easy there "fella" Well of course there's a long list of Democrats who I would take over Trump, including Yang, but if Biden is up to another run in 2024, I'd support him!