Concentrations Part 5 - serial dilution

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 116

  • @jessiegonzalezhuert1
    @jessiegonzalezhuert1 6 років тому +39

    You have an extra zero on your 7th tube as a result you also have an extra zero in your 8th tube . You went from 3 zeros to five

  • @naseemakhter8602
    @naseemakhter8602 5 років тому

    best video I ever see. Really I saw a lot of viideos but could not understand dilution which you teach me in one minute. Awesome. thanks a lot

  • @prashantkumarparmanu
    @prashantkumarparmanu 4 роки тому

    Best teacher for the lab calculation lesson . Thanks a lot Sir .

  • @leaderofpeace
    @leaderofpeace 13 років тому +1

    @Arishtat you are correct to say that the volumes are 300 uL because the dilution is always calculated with the total volume (30 + 270) then that is intern used for the stock

  • @clairewhite4536
    @clairewhite4536 8 років тому

    best explanation I've seen so far. Thanks

  • @ThePingy27
    @ThePingy27 11 років тому +47

    my right ear feels lonely. besides that great video!

  • @arishtat4523
    @arishtat4523 14 років тому +3

    Greate series. I'm a little confused about the total volumes, though. In the end, doesn't well 8 contain a total of 300µl and all other wells 270µl?

  • @dimaabuelainain7670
    @dimaabuelainain7670 2 місяці тому

    This was very helpful! Thank you so much!!

  • @smartaleck05
    @smartaleck05 13 років тому +1

    I have a practical test tomorrow, and this really helped! Thanks.

  • @Noveleffect
    @Noveleffect 12 років тому +1

    Beautifully explained---clear, and easy to follow. Excellent! Thank you! :)

  • @jamiedaly6065
    @jamiedaly6065 9 років тому +3

    Thanks for the fantastic help with the video but I hope you don't mind it's I just have a few questions to ask:
    Does the dilution factor form a geometric sequence in the form 10 x 10^n-1 for each beaker you diluted?
    Secondly, shouldn't the last dilution be 0.000001ug/uL (1x10^-6) because you started from 100ug/uL and diluted it by 10x for 8 turns?
    If you could provide answers to this then that would be fantastic!
    Thank you :)

  • @samixa7
    @samixa7 9 років тому +5

    Thank you Greg. Clear explanation! I have one question (may be it sounds stupid). How does well 1-7 have 300 ul final volume. We started with 270 ul and added 30 ul to well 1. But, after that we pipetted out 30 ul to well 2 from well 1. Then, well 1 should have 270 ul as before, right ? Please enlighten me.

    • @adaudaya3211
      @adaudaya3211 9 років тому +1

      you're right

    • @muhammadishtiaq5712
      @muhammadishtiaq5712 8 років тому +5

      +Samiksha Ghimire Once we make require concentration , then we can take any volume from the vial, it does not matter...

    • @rajatbhatt6399
      @rajatbhatt6399 7 років тому

      but during measurment of turbidity it will

    • @khalidbashir4033
      @khalidbashir4033 6 років тому

      absolutely right

  • @ss4vegeta1
    @ss4vegeta1 9 років тому +7

    I dont get the 1microliter/100L at the end part. How did you get that?

    • @darieldiaz2106
      @darieldiaz2106 7 років тому +1

      You probably don't need the explanation now, but.... 1micoL/100L is equal to (1x10^-6)/100L= 0.00000001microG/microL or 100,000,000x dilution.

  • @thehh5118
    @thehh5118 8 років тому +33

    0.0001->0.000001?Isn't it 0.00001

    • @ninakh7427
      @ninakh7427 5 років тому +2

      The Hh yes its a mistake

  • @naboria5
    @naboria5 5 років тому

    Thank you very much. It helped me with my Research Project. I needed to construct a calibration curve for my project.

  • @yathatisgood
    @yathatisgood 9 років тому +2

    Hi there.
    I want to dilute sodium hypochlorite 5%/1litre to 1.5%/1litre but I m struggling with the maths.
    Could you please write down your workings
    I think the answer is 4 parts water and 1part sodium hypochlorite
    Kind regards
    Steve

  • @inluvwithgod
    @inluvwithgod 10 років тому +9

    Hey I have a question for you. This may be silly. I know you initially placed 30ul into the first mircrotube. but then you took out 30 ul. why is the total volume still 300 ul? wouldn't it be 270? and the last tube contain 300ul?

    • @xraydelta
      @xraydelta 10 років тому

      I had this same question as I was watching.

    • @randomhobbyist
      @randomhobbyist 9 років тому +12

      -I think your issue is in calculating concentration. Which volume do you use? 270 or 300. If i'm right keep reading :)
      -Yes. the new volume for that container is 270ul. However, when you made the mixture the total volume was 300. Removing volume after the fact doesn't change the concentration. If you make a new mixture - freeze. calculate concentration with that.
      -analogy: When you pour a glass of orange juice, the orange juice in the jug has the same concentration there is just less volume. you didn't dilute the orange juice.
      -hopefully that helps :)

    • @inluvwithgod
      @inluvwithgod 9 років тому

      thanks it does,

    • @j246802
      @j246802 7 років тому +4

      This is a satisfactory explanation. When any tube was first diluted after addition of 30 uL from the previous tube and was for a moment at 300 ul. After the then diluted product was removed from the 300 uL the final volume was 270 ul. At both 300 ul level after the initial 30 was added AND at 270 AFTER the 30 was removed for the next tube the concentration remain the same. The exact volumes after dilutions are complete might be useful for downstream analyses, but does not affect concentrations. You could take 30 from the very last dilution and discard it, and then all tubes would have appropriate concentrations and all would have 270 ul of sample remaining.

  • @gkpeter
    @gkpeter  14 років тому

    @Arishtat Yes, so that is why you have to think ahead. For example if I was using this dilution series for a standard curve and I need triplicates of 100 uL, it wouldn't work.

  • @sian2982
    @sian2982 4 роки тому +1

    Sir, in stock the conc is 100 microgm/ 1micro liter. From 1microliter how u take 30 microliter?

  • @jordanfrederick6155
    @jordanfrederick6155 8 років тому

    How did you know how many tubes to use? especially if you aren't given wells to pipette in.

  • @ceosajid
    @ceosajid 3 роки тому +1

    thank you for this video !

  • @iarue
    @iarue 13 років тому

    Hello nice video. I understand most of it apart from where u talked about the other way of doing it instead of pippeting it out using the serial dilution. Then u mention 1ul of stock/100 L H20. I was wondering if u could explain how u derived those numbers. Thanks

  • @jetrojuanico4389
    @jetrojuanico4389 3 роки тому

    is it possible to reverse the equation to produced concentrated solutions?

  • @S19D4H8
    @S19D4H8 9 років тому +1

    Can you make a video showing how to calculate it going backwards. For example, what if your stock solution was an "Unknown concentration" and the concentration of the final test tube was 10. How would you do the math to compute the concentration of the substance inside the stock solution?

    • @AmandaLovesOldFords
      @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 років тому

      In this example, the dilution factor is 10. All you have to do is multiply your final concentration by the dilution factor (10) to calculate the concentration of the preceding solution. You would repeat this step, calculating backwards until you finally get to your stock solution.

  • @jaz499
    @jaz499 Рік тому

    how do you find the concentration of each well?

  • @sephorambuyi1877
    @sephorambuyi1877 6 років тому

    How to calculate the concentration of dye present in each dilution?

  • @lilmsyumi
    @lilmsyumi 8 років тому +1

    Final volume is 270 microliter. 30:270=1:9. Isn't it 9 times? not net times?

    • @AmandaLovesOldFords
      @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 років тому +1

      The total volume of solution is 300 um once the 30 um of stock solution is added to the 270 um of water. 30:300 = 1:10

  • @pulockpaul7888
    @pulockpaul7888 3 роки тому

    How would you determine the concentration now?

  • @lizzyinthahizzy
    @lizzyinthahizzy 10 років тому

    So you multiplied the dilution factor of 1/10 by the original stock to get 10 microliter/ mL in the first box? And then proceeded to multiply 10 by 1/10 to get the second box? Also, did you change tips after each dilution? thnx.

    • @AmandaLovesOldFords
      @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 років тому

      There's no need to change tips. You are literally transferring the same solution from one beaker to the next.

  • @aliceincokes
    @aliceincokes 6 років тому +7

    This really helped me a lot to understand the topic! I appreciate the application. However, I just noticed a little mistake of what you did in the illustration which confused the viewers. You said that the final volume (which is the volume of the last test tube) was 300 uL yet you drew a line which was misunderstood by your viewers because they thought all the test tubes have 300 uL when the rest has 270 uL except the last test tube. Anyway, great tutorial!!! Please post more.

  • @estelamestellaestellaiscry4417
    @estelamestellaestellaiscry4417 5 років тому

    Hello..excellent videos more examples PLEASE..

  • @김지수-x7v
    @김지수-x7v 5 років тому

    I have a question for you. Is stock undiluted solution...?plz reply T.T

  • @DA-sj2gw
    @DA-sj2gw 8 років тому

    If I have the following solution: 3x capture antigen (dilute with 1x PBS). Does this mean that I have to dilute it or is it already diluted?

  • @brea1443
    @brea1443 12 років тому

    Can you explain what happens if you were to use different dilutions from well 2 on?

  • @hwasa8956
    @hwasa8956 4 роки тому

    What is the concentration for each of the dilution

  • @thechannelthatjustsubstoev960
    @thechannelthatjustsubstoev960 9 років тому

    why do you jump from microlitres to ml, say at 4:38?

    • @johnpham747
      @johnpham747 9 років тому +2

      If you watch for 10 more seconds he fixes it to Micro liter

  • @gkpeter
    @gkpeter  15 років тому

    Your right, thanks. I will annotate that later. Good catch.

  • @devanggondaleeya4321
    @devanggondaleeya4321 4 роки тому

    If solutions contain 100ug/ul and then you take 30 ul from it so how much amount of substance in 30 ul?

  • @polo619652
    @polo619652 12 років тому

    We're supposed to find out that if I take 5mL from a 10mL sample substance, mix it into 10mL of water (the outcome would be 1:3), then take 5mL of that 1:3 solution and mix it with the original sample substance, then which one would have a higher concentration based on it's original substance?

  • @akremmo
    @akremmo 9 років тому +16

    I believe you made a mistake. you would need to get rid of the 30microL from the last tube to keep the volume 270ml in all tubes.

    • @jaster_mereel7657
      @jaster_mereel7657 6 років тому +5

      That does not really matter because the concentration does not change. If you reduce the last volume to 270microL it is still the same concentration. So why waste 30microL?

    • @khalidbashir4033
      @khalidbashir4033 6 років тому

      but in case of elisa .....concentration matters a lot

  • @PurpleNoodles
    @PurpleNoodles 7 років тому

    This was helpful! Thank you so much for this video

  • @joeyrousselle6086
    @joeyrousselle6086 6 років тому

    Great stuff, thanks!

  • @Mariaalvarezrial
    @Mariaalvarezrial 6 років тому

    the best explanation!!! you are GOD!!! I am Spanish and you explain better than my stupid teacher jajajaja xx .

  • @24hrsport65
    @24hrsport65 9 років тому

    I do have unclear idea on this. when we serially dilute each tube with the same amount, but the final tube becomes 10ml and the other will be 9ml. so how can we make the last tube 9ml?

    • @adaudaya3211
      @adaudaya3211 9 років тому +2

      just take out the 1ml of the final tube

  • @estelamestellaestellaiscry4417
    @estelamestellaestellaiscry4417 4 роки тому

    Thanks very helpful. More. Samples ..

  • @mr.g-joy893
    @mr.g-joy893 9 місяців тому

    Thanks. I get the solution to dilute

  • @alyuntariq9340
    @alyuntariq9340 8 років тому

    OK so basically that means that in serial dilution it doesn't matter for the concentrations of all the tubes to be of the same concentration?!! that because the volume of water remains the same ....ryte?

  • @naomikpogho563
    @naomikpogho563 8 років тому +1

    why would it be 1 microlitres of stock to 100 L of H20 why isn't is 100 microlitres

  • @firestorm210
    @firestorm210 4 роки тому

    So the DF is the 30=300/Vi? And that’s how he got the 1/10? Sense it’s volume it would be DF=Vf/Vi And that’s how he got the DF as 1/10?

  • @mahmoudhilali5557
    @mahmoudhilali5557 7 років тому

    Science IV - Well done!

  • @amandaluongo2112
    @amandaluongo2112 8 років тому

    THANK YOU FOR THIS :) I totally understand now!!!

  • @nareshvasani
    @nareshvasani 14 років тому

    Formula for Dilution factor is Final volume by Aliquot volume.
    This is correct or not please let me know.

  • @eldonjulesgalang2667
    @eldonjulesgalang2667 11 років тому

    what if the amount of sample you will serial transfer from one well to the next well is not consistent? e.g from first well is 30 micro-liter then the next is 20 micro-liter how will you compute for the final diluting factor?

  • @lilymoore3955
    @lilymoore3955 8 років тому

    You're awesome! thanks!

  • @akremirania9131
    @akremirania9131 6 років тому

    Excellent,explanation,thank,u,sir,

  • @mahmoudzulaihatabdullahi642
    @mahmoudzulaihatabdullahi642 6 років тому

    wow! I get it now! thank you!

  • @alliyam283
    @alliyam283 3 роки тому

    Can somebody please explain why the concentration of tube 1 is 10ug/uL and tube tube concentration is 1ug/uL. Shouldn’t the concentration of tube 1 be 0.1ug/uL??

  • @jeffreybarrett7909
    @jeffreybarrett7909 7 років тому

    thank you for the upload

  • @doogiedog1234
    @doogiedog1234 12 років тому

    Why cant u just discard the extra 30ul from the last tube?

  • @kalemcep2518
    @kalemcep2518 9 років тому

    Very helpful,thanks :)

  • @rajatbhatt6399
    @rajatbhatt6399 7 років тому

    how total volume of solution in each tube became 300micro liter
    you added 30 micro liter to 270 micro liter then subsequently you removed 30 from each so it should become 270 again but you have written 300

    • @AmandaLovesOldFords
      @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 років тому

      300 um was the final volume of the new solution produced. You calculate the concentration of that solution, then dilute it to make the next solution.

  • @gordonh9921
    @gordonh9921 3 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @alovesherdoggie
    @alovesherdoggie 10 років тому

    i mean like I kinda get it, but uggh the whole like 10 to the negative exponent thingy still confuses me, you didn't touch base on that :(

  • @ThangHuynh10
    @ThangHuynh10 12 років тому +2

    No need to change tips in between wells here (I think).

    • @jeeva1996
      @jeeva1996 4 роки тому

      yh, you can keep the same tip in this case

  • @lenininsuasti9936
    @lenininsuasti9936 11 років тому

    Excelente!!! Gracias

  • @banz66
    @banz66 10 років тому +2

    merci de france

  • @mypeniscanjetfire
    @mypeniscanjetfire 13 років тому

    Thank you very much.

  • @amirulfaez8437
    @amirulfaez8437 8 років тому

    U THE BEST...THANK U

  • @SaurabhKumar-hj3jf
    @SaurabhKumar-hj3jf 4 роки тому

    Serial dilution for bacteria was given by..................... Pls give me answer as soon as

  • @razmossis
    @razmossis 4 роки тому

    The final concentration is 1uL in 10L, not 100L

  • @jessicawhite6369
    @jessicawhite6369 11 років тому

    Thank you!

  • @user-ashlyn44
    @user-ashlyn44 2 роки тому

    THANKYOU

  • @dr.husseint.altamimi6589
    @dr.husseint.altamimi6589 11 років тому

    nice video

  • @JJoverlee1
    @JJoverlee1 11 років тому +5

    The seventh dilution is wrong.

  • @joeschmoe8263
    @joeschmoe8263 12 років тому

    You changed units from micro liters to milli liters when you were writing out the dilution, good explanation though.

  • @603fofo
    @603fofo 13 років тому

    Thank u so much !!!

  • @redarmuhammad1953
    @redarmuhammad1953 10 років тому

    GREAT VID

  • @purplepick1
    @purplepick1 12 років тому

    THANKS!!

  • @ashimqc
    @ashimqc 14 років тому

    thanks

  • @B4IRUTUARU16
    @B4IRUTUARU16 11 років тому

    My left ear enjoyed that

  • @razaneaoufi7765
    @razaneaoufi7765 4 роки тому

    but each time you take 30 you will not have at the end 300 in all the tube!

  • @بتولمجبل-غ1ل
    @بتولمجبل-غ1ل 5 років тому

    👍💛

  • @caleb1102
    @caleb1102 3 роки тому

    you added an extra zero going from well 6 to 7

  • @bryannaribeiro136
    @bryannaribeiro136 2 роки тому

    You added an extra zero in your 7th tube. The final stock dilution should be 0.000001 ug/uL

  • @abokhalid9460
    @abokhalid9460 6 років тому

    i beleive that what you have done is wrong coz
    1- final volum is 270 it is not 300 since you have subsequently removed 30 from the first tube and diluted it in each tube and you should have throw it after last tube.
    2- to do 1/10 dilution of total volum 300 you should add 33 of stock and 333 of diluent (solut/slolvent+solute=33/300+33 =0.099 =approx 1/10=0.1)
    3- then you can add 300 of diluent and then 33 of stock and subsquent dilution so the total volum will be 300 in each tube
    4- what you have done is good for one step dilution not serial! 1/10 = 300/10 = 30 - 300 =270+30 which is coreect for one step dilution.

  • @hydersinada1566
    @hydersinada1566 11 років тому

    اهلين ياحلوين

  • @joeschmoe8263
    @joeschmoe8263 12 років тому

    whoops, spoke to soon i see you corrected it

  • @AmandaLovesOldFords
    @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 років тому +1

    There are so many mistakes in this video... all you're doing is confusing people. You should just take this video down.

    • @darieldiaz2106
      @darieldiaz2106 7 років тому

      I can see why you find it confusing (maybe the fact that he's adding the 270microL first?) but the dilutions are correct.

    • @darieldiaz2106
      @darieldiaz2106 7 років тому

      Also, maybe instead of just saying that there are mistakes, how about just pointing them out?

  • @eegg020
    @eegg020 4 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @MOTIIFkeys823
    @MOTIIFkeys823 9 років тому

    Thank you kind sir.