Mercantilism: The Economics of Absolutism

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
  • www.tomrichey.net
    Mercantilism is an economic philosophy that emphasizes competition between nations for wealth, which was measured in terms of who had the most gold and silver. A mercantilist economy stresses national self-sufficiency and the preservation of national wealth through a favorable balance of trade. Mercantilism is a type of command economy, strictly regulating the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. Although I specifically focus on Jean-Baptiste Colbert's implementation of a mercantilist economy in absolutist France under Louis XIV (especially useful for AP Euro), the material in this lecture is also useful for US History students who want additional context for understanding the conflicts between the British colonies and Parliament regarding trade and taxation.
    If you like this lecture, check out my AP European History Playlist: • AP European History Re...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 342

  • @Hamza-qk9yq
    @Hamza-qk9yq 7 років тому +393

    Hey discount Matt Damon, you explain these things really well.

  • @hannahk6864
    @hannahk6864 8 років тому +118

    he looks like matt damon sounds like matthew mcconaughey

    • @yungjames5103
      @yungjames5103 8 років тому

      Knew he looked like someone!

    • @rk5759
      @rk5759 4 роки тому

      SHITS LIKE HUMAN

    • @liam1558
      @liam1558 4 роки тому +1

      matt damon if he was from the south and not boston

    • @thetasworld
      @thetasworld 4 роки тому

      Spot on

    • @ezewuluchukwuma5543
      @ezewuluchukwuma5543 3 роки тому

      @@rk5759 you mmyymymy you make mmkmtmkj

  • @Nonamearisto
    @Nonamearisto 9 років тому +141

    So much better than "Crash Course".

    • @BrianFaure1
      @BrianFaure1 7 років тому +20

      Both good but im glad there's some competition

    • @pingukutepro
      @pingukutepro 6 років тому +15

      The guy name Green in Crash Course, he's shit, not giving any information beside joking

    • @keaneorchard6654
      @keaneorchard6654 6 років тому +30

      @@pingukutepro give him a break, he makes subjects snappy, fun and interesting- plus he only has 10mins to discuss. Great for someone new to a subject and wants to grasp the gist of things. But yeah this guy is way better for in-depth understanding

    • @Andre_APM
      @Andre_APM 5 років тому +1

      @@TonyFarrugiaStrongman ...explain?

    • @nateparrish5236
      @nateparrish5236 4 роки тому

      John Green is to History what Alton Brown is to cooking.

  • @ansuhmayram
    @ansuhmayram 9 років тому +86

    You explain the background, and provide specific information. They dont do that at all at English universities. They jump right into the historiographical debate getting you to read contemporaries and modern historians like Adam Smith, Chris Wickham, Marx, Beat Kumin, Burke or whoever. Our introductions just consist of periodisation, definitions, prioritization. You ease us in far more, which I need so thank you.

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +20

      Thanks so much for the kind words! I tutored a Canadian university student this semester who told me something very similar. I don't see the point in someone trying to read Smith or Burke if they haven't even completed a basic introductory lecture course.

    • @finalfrontier001
      @finalfrontier001 9 років тому +2

      ***** French schools in Canada suck hard!! Their indoctrinate you into socialism and they hate anything Anglo orientated.

    • @ashton6700
      @ashton6700 7 років тому +1

      H M Canada stinks. If I offended anyone, I'm sorry, eh

    • @carmencoria2558
      @carmencoria2558 6 років тому

      H M j

    • @silent_stalker3687
      @silent_stalker3687 4 роки тому +1

      My school didn’t cover anyone but Marx, Engles and Trotsky

  • @philparenti5751
    @philparenti5751 9 років тому +18

    I was reading an article by the Foundation for Economic Education and they made a reference to Mercantilism with only a cursory and unsatisfying explanation so I found your video. I liked it and subscribed to your channel. I look forward to more.

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +2

      Phil Parenti I appreciate your subscription! I hope my upcoming videos don't disappoint.

  • @christianoliverio2109
    @christianoliverio2109 8 років тому +34

    I feel way more confident about my AP Euro exams now. Our books doesn't explain things as simply. Thank you so much for all these awesome videos!

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  8 років тому +14

      +Christian Oliverio I love hearing stuff like this. This is why I do what I do. Best of luck on your exam!

  • @EmilyHernandez-qo8em
    @EmilyHernandez-qo8em 9 років тому +62

    Your channel will help me survive my first AP class. thank you so much!

  • @robertcrisci1367
    @robertcrisci1367 9 років тому

    Crystal clear presentation. The professor has a certain tone that seems to facilitate learning.

  • @johanjonsson6504
    @johanjonsson6504 9 років тому +1

    I have an exam in history at university today, it's for the time period 1350-1720 mostly european history! Your videos has really helped me to study! Thank you! :D

  • @richeys1fan471
    @richeys1fan471 9 років тому +14

    Wow. Can we ALL just take a moment to recognize how amazing Tom Richey is? HE DA BEST.

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +8

      I don't know whether to be flattered or creeped out... I'm just gonna go with both.

  • @MorbidObscurity
    @MorbidObscurity 9 років тому +19

    You're a legend Tom. Next year I'm doing final-year level Revolutions history, I think your videos are going to become less of an interest and more of a necessity.

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +4

      Hamish Observes Thanks! I realized after reading your comment that I wore my MASTODON t-shirt for this one. Always glad to educate a lover of great music!

  • @thisismylovehandle
    @thisismylovehandle 5 місяців тому

    Thank you so much!! Im reading Montesquieu, and now everything makes sense.

  • @renecobos9336
    @renecobos9336 9 років тому +5

    Thanks. I never really understood the concept of mercantilism but I understand it now. Can you make a video about the Anglo-Dutch wars and how economics played into this feud? I would understand that conflict much better also.

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +1

      I will actually be visiting the Netherlands in July and plan to make some videos after my trip sharing what I learn. I will keep the Anglo-Dutch wars in mind for my upcoming Dutch History series.

    • @renecobos9336
      @renecobos9336 9 років тому

      Tom Richey​ Cool thanks

  • @makzmakz
    @makzmakz 9 років тому +18

    In the end of the video you say that "mercantilism isnt so much in vogue today, when there is alot more emphasis on free trade". I really don't see this. Sure there are sectors of the economy where there is less mercantilism than before, but in other sectors it's the exact same thing still. I live in Sweden and there is protective tariffs on imports from the US. If you have a patent on a service/product, you have an exclusive monopoly right (given by the force of the government). Subsidies are rampant in agriculture, both in the EU and the US (corn for instance). Also in sweden there is this constant talk about "boosting export industries" by devaluing the Krona, apparently in order to have a "beneficial trade balance". All in all, there are significant remnants of mercantilism in the West to this day.

    • @erikdk321
      @erikdk321 6 років тому +1

      Unfortunately you are right.

  • @Pfsif
    @Pfsif 6 років тому +6

    "If command economy worked, we'd all be speaking Russian" Some famous guy

  • @tarquiniussuperbus21
    @tarquiniussuperbus21 7 років тому +1

    A Market economy is also prone to corruption because the accumulation of wealth gives you power to influence the state which in turn can give you a monopoly.

  • @juliettemay2666
    @juliettemay2666 3 роки тому

    Thank you! I’m studying Western Civ II, the Columbian exchange, and I didn’t really get mercantilism. I do now. I love your videos!

  • @teresaconners1143
    @teresaconners1143 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much. Your video helped me understand this for my economics class. I hope I will be able to find additional videos from you for other topics or classes I have. You have no idea how much this has helped me. I appreciate you doing this video. Thanks again!!

  • @KaloyanDrenski
    @KaloyanDrenski 9 років тому +9

    Excellent job! You summed up everything you need to know about the mercantilism in 18 minutes. Subscribed, and lookin forward to watch your other amazingly educational videos! Thank you for doing this!

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +1

      Glad I could help you and thanks for subscribing! It's encouragement like this that keeps me going.

  • @FA-tq9ip
    @FA-tq9ip 5 років тому +2

    Great video! Please could you do a video on the Physiocrats and maybe with a comparison to Mercantilism and Adam Smith?

  • @iainmiddleton4175
    @iainmiddleton4175 2 роки тому

    Sir, brilliant. You’re an amazing resource. Thank you.

  • @yvyibree3754
    @yvyibree3754 7 років тому +2

    I like your dialect. And the video- it helped a lot!

  • @benedicttheophilus3063
    @benedicttheophilus3063 6 років тому

    you know Tom's an expert when he plugs his favorite team in the middle of his lecture.

  • @xiaodongwang7753
    @xiaodongwang7753 4 роки тому +4

    I was born in 1963 and grew up in the planned economy of China. Then I went to the United States and did a Ph.D. in history, international relations, from the late 1980s to the 1990s, when free trade was the trend. I’m 57 now, thinking how I can explain today’s world to my two sons, one at Madison and the other at Vanderbilt, when I came upon your video. Great explanation! And thank you. For some reason, I particularly like your example of the mercantile store, which I never thought of. You will have two more subscribers shortly. Thanks again.

  • @KapiteinKrentebol
    @KapiteinKrentebol 6 років тому +3

    Thanks! I am reading Wealth of Nations for the past year and now I realize it's a manifest against mercantilism.

  • @rktech3292
    @rktech3292 9 років тому +5

    Hey, stumbled upon your great videos looking to learn some European history. Awesome stuff and thank you! Keep making more!

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому

      Will do and thanks for the encouragement!

  • @scottishbananaclan
    @scottishbananaclan 3 роки тому

    I love this video. I really like this Economic ideology. I'll definitely look into it more.

  • @pehrnilson8809
    @pehrnilson8809 9 років тому +5

    Hey there! thanks for this video!

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +1

      My pleasure! Glad I can help you!

  • @AlexaDeWit
    @AlexaDeWit 8 років тому +1

    I don't know of any market economies that aren't ridden with mercantilist practices, policies, and corrupt favouratism.

  • @shekin6153
    @shekin6153 9 років тому +8

    Great! Can you make a video about Physiocrats?

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому

      This would be an interesting topic to tackle - believe they influenced Jefferson quite a bit.

    • @shekin6153
      @shekin6153 9 років тому

      Tom Richey yeap & most of their theory was against the Mercantalist idea.

  • @MilwaukeeF40C
    @MilwaukeeF40C 9 років тому +1

    The term 'mercantilism' doesn't seem to be very well known in contemporary politics, despite mercantilist style intervention turning up an awful lot in supposedly capitalist economies.

  • @BirdUpFR
    @BirdUpFR 8 років тому +9

    -Notices Mastodon shirt
    -gains +90 respect

  • @thomasgiannini
    @thomasgiannini 8 років тому +1

    ahh! So was the favorable balance of trade part of Frances 'politique' considerations in Europe's balance of power? I assume this is the same Colbert who was involved with the Peace of Westphalia. Anyways good job! your vids are super helpful

  • @reubenoakley8967
    @reubenoakley8967 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for this! I keep hearing people say that capitalism fueled European colonialism, and is therefore evil, and I keep having to tell people "no, that was mercantilism". It's nice to have this quick refresher on the subject so I can give an easier explanation of how different these systems are

  • @sawhlainghtoo731
    @sawhlainghtoo731 5 років тому +2

    Can you explain about anti mercantilism

  • @EdwardIsLiving
    @EdwardIsLiving 9 років тому +3

    Hmmm pretty interesting. Can you by chance do a hypothetical of mercantile wars/out trading rivals? The British during the 17th/18th century were actually losing ground to the Dutch trading systems, despite Britain having more colonies and more control over exports/imports. How does that work?

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +7

      The Dutch practiced free trade while other European powers were running mercantilism. The Dutch system of free trade ended up being more profitable, which led to Adam Smith's publication of Wealth of Nations and the resulting movement toward economic liberalism.

    • @EdwardIsLiving
      @EdwardIsLiving 9 років тому

      Thanks Tom!!!

  • @SirAldz
    @SirAldz 3 роки тому +1

    Who's here watching and studying on point or in detail even though they are not business/management/entrepreneur major. I have nothing to to with that course but I was tasked to report this. Minor subjs are quite a burden😢

  • @gabrielnieves6432
    @gabrielnieves6432 3 роки тому +1

    I prefer the following definition of Economics, as it is more accurate and helpful. Economics is the study of scarcity/limited resources.

  • @mononiazi9975
    @mononiazi9975 8 років тому +2

    Hi, thanks for all your explanation, it really helps those who need. Could you please explain the summary of Artistole two party-exchange and Friedrich List and the political economy
    of the nation-state

  • @kalyanarc4467
    @kalyanarc4467 8 років тому +1

    So if I can produce everything, I don't need foreign trade, which means I can max on tariffs, which means I would minimize imports, which means my country could make huge profit, which means that communist economies are super efficient if you can manage to produce all sorts of goods, which is hard.
    Thanks Richey, for bringing more etatism in me !!

    • @nix4110
      @nix4110 8 років тому

      Kalyan Arc Your country would have to produce everything even that which they have a terrible disadvantage in. Flow of money into the country would cause inflation and the cost of production and thus exports would rise (until they aren't bought anymore). I don't think communist nations can avoid global trade economics.

    • @kalyanarc4467
      @kalyanarc4467 8 років тому

      Well, that's the point yo; All of the economy would be great if a nation could produce everything, but sadly, it is hardly possible.
      Thet's why I like the idea of imperialism and globalism :)

  • @martinschulz9381
    @martinschulz9381 2 роки тому

    Right on, well explained.

  • @Kanfachan
    @Kanfachan 7 років тому +1

    Mercantilism is THE true way nations become powerful and wealthy....NOT free trade.

    • @Nick13ro
      @Nick13ro 7 років тому +2

      It's the easy way you mean. Problem is, if you're not able to secure a colonial empire for yourself it's also impossible, because nobody is gonna put up with your trade diktats of their own free will.

    • @alexanderle1610
      @alexanderle1610 5 років тому

      Its also how the international community decides to block all trade with you and so you fall in economic regression and become a third world country.

  • @nathanrobinson1099
    @nathanrobinson1099 8 років тому +13

    I think the best definition I've come across is, "Economics is the study of the use of scarce resources which have alternative uses."

    • @LyndonLaRoucheArchive
      @LyndonLaRoucheArchive 8 років тому

      No. They might say that in all the Econ 101 textbooks but that just reflects the system of Empires that had a Darwinistic dog eat dog philosophy of the elites versus the rest of humanity.

    • @nathanrobinson1099
      @nathanrobinson1099 8 років тому

      OaklandLYM What would your definition be?

    • @LyndonLaRoucheArchive
      @LyndonLaRoucheArchive 8 років тому

      Nathan Robinson Its best to reject Adam Smith's mischaraterization of the Cameralist school of economics entirely since he was employed by Frances rival and studied under the Pysiocrats. Reading through the various writings of the members of that way of thought was the overarching concept of the need of the development and modernization of the nation, the land, and the pressing need of developing the people versus the feudalist concept of rulers and peasants.

    • @nathanrobinson1099
      @nathanrobinson1099 8 років тому +1

      OaklandLYM
      That's not a definition.

    • @LyndonLaRoucheArchive
      @LyndonLaRoucheArchive 8 років тому

      Nathan Robinson You can't have a definition based on a lie written by a dishonest creep.

  • @danielsson4349
    @danielsson4349 3 роки тому

    this helped me out alot. Big thanks

  • @avathemarvellover3953
    @avathemarvellover3953 5 років тому +3

    3:12 "The birds work for the Bourgeoisie"

  • @miracleawesome4540
    @miracleawesome4540 9 років тому +5

    Makes so much sense.

  • @jiannamarin8966
    @jiannamarin8966 8 років тому +2

    You go so in-depth that I genuinely understand the concept afterwards. Thank you!

  • @tmliborio
    @tmliborio 9 років тому +5

    MASTODOOOOOON

  • @esperancemusonera8678
    @esperancemusonera8678 6 років тому

    well done vid, thank you Mr.Richey

  • @dm_sliderrr6946
    @dm_sliderrr6946 Рік тому +1

    This video is still teaching people like myself 8 years later

  • @rajarak
    @rajarak 8 років тому +6

    Thanks I learned a lot

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  8 років тому +2

      A pleasure to help you!

  • @pearlmendez836
    @pearlmendez836 9 років тому

    Thank you!! I love this! very smart and well explained!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THANKYOU!!!!!

  • @jemilyasin9292
    @jemilyasin9292 Рік тому

    Thanks it’s amazing explanation

  • @DanTheMan-hg6un
    @DanTheMan-hg6un 5 років тому +3

    who else is here from Mrs.Dennis's AP World class

    • @marcoa.jimenez3827
      @marcoa.jimenez3827 5 років тому

      cheeze Man wus gud

    • @scoobertdoo1853
      @scoobertdoo1853 5 років тому

      theres 150,000 people who have watched this video

    • @DanTheMan-hg6un
      @DanTheMan-hg6un 5 років тому

      @@scoobertdoo1853 and that's why I asked, to see if anyone would see this comment lol

  • @navdeepkaur6169
    @navdeepkaur6169 8 років тому +1

    That mercantilism turkey thing makes no sense.

  • @crazyzombiebos7778
    @crazyzombiebos7778 3 роки тому +1

    Was assigned this to watch and take notes over as HOMEWORK. but it was pretty informative and somewhat entertaining. your students are lucky to have you.

  • @gber8963
    @gber8963 8 років тому +1

    Mr. Tom, I'm a master student, but even so I really learn a lot with your videos. Sometimes I want to remember a concept or refresh a subject in my mind for a research or presentation, I always come to your channel to give a look if you have made a video about the subject, your videos are not only instructive, but often fun and clear.
    I appreciate your work and hope that you keep sharing your videos with us on youtube, it's an amazing job you do :)
    Warm regards!

  • @johnm9548
    @johnm9548 7 років тому +1

    Never thought of Mercantilism in the context of a team economy. H'mmmmm!

  • @jamespeng62
    @jamespeng62 4 роки тому +1

    The Chinese economy explained in 18 minutes

  • @chesterg.791
    @chesterg.791 4 роки тому +1

    You're into economics and metal? DID WE JUST BECOME BEST FRIENDS?!.. Subscribed 🤘

  • @victorcanada1882
    @victorcanada1882 3 роки тому +1

    Well done. I’ve lived in Louisiana for over 30 years. Nice to know that’s where you are from.

  • @SD-wm6mr
    @SD-wm6mr 5 років тому +1

    Is japan a command economy or a market economy?

  • @dvepps6780
    @dvepps6780 8 років тому

    so can we say that corporations are basically mercantilistic. export as much as possible, import as little. replace export with profit and import with risk.

  • @gonebamboo4116
    @gonebamboo4116 5 років тому

    Good talk, good explanation
    Thanks

  • @itskiranchauhan6674
    @itskiranchauhan6674 4 роки тому +1

    Really beautifully explained, thanks, man.

  • @StephenieBaileyDEAFMETAL
    @StephenieBaileyDEAFMETAL 8 років тому +1

    You are very cool. Thank you for helping me CLEP out of three courses, and nice shirt!

  • @michaelreeves6441
    @michaelreeves6441 4 роки тому

    Is the inclusion of corruption on the list to suggest the exclusion of it in other economic models?

  • @m1c6b9
    @m1c6b9 7 років тому +3

    Nice shirt!

  • @pavolivanko9475
    @pavolivanko9475 8 років тому +2

    Great teacher, great video.

  • @xbox_cheeto5338
    @xbox_cheeto5338 4 роки тому

    Hmm that export-import dynamic reminds me a lot of Romania domestic grain policies during the cold war. Mercantilism is a form of command economy, so I could see why some common themes would be present. I wonder to what degree the integration of east bloc states existed to have a pseudo mercantilist internal trade system exist. I know that Moscow often provided members with lots of subsidies and goods, but I have never really heard much for the others providing the SU with anything

  • @patryk1734
    @patryk1734 7 років тому +1

    you helped me to play eurpa universalis iv. thank you

  • @JustAnotherGamerUS
    @JustAnotherGamerUS 8 років тому

    Question! You mentioned in mercantilism a nation exports more goods than it imports. Thinking this in the context of the British's American colonies who wanted to trade with French's American colonies, why was England upset by this?
    My guess is that the British's American colonies weren't qualified to trade on their own.

    • @Longlius
      @Longlius 5 років тому

      The American colonies traded with everyone. One aspect of this was that the American colonists frequently did not use British money, but instead Spanish or Dutch money (pieces of eight, 'thalers', 'dollars'). This resulted in a sort of proto-currency crisis: the British found themselves trading at a disadvantage with American merchants, because American merchants favored Spanish or Dutch coins and would often charge premiums for transactions in English coinage (if they accepted them at all).
      As for the question of whether Britain's American colonies were qualified to trade on their own - this was the central question of the American movement for independence. They had enjoyed a relatively long period (~150 years) of quasi-independence with very little oversight from England (and later Britain), and felt that it was their right to maintain an independent trade policy. The British felt that they were subjects of the king and that it was not proper for the colonies to engage in unregulated trade that might strengthen the positions of Britain's colonial rivals.

  • @HaidarAli-zr5ob
    @HaidarAli-zr5ob 9 років тому

    Hi sir!, really great and detail explanation. I'm writing thesis right now, is there any literature that said Mercantilism is not only about economic but also national agenda. Thank you, and sir i'm not forgot to subscribe. sorry for bad english, im from Indonesia

  • @klt2841
    @klt2841 8 років тому +2

    17:22 // summary

  • @sthembelehlongwane4719
    @sthembelehlongwane4719 5 років тому

    great explaination.. thank you

  • @InternetMameluq
    @InternetMameluq 2 роки тому

    16:40: That's true, but you're underselling the problem. It doesn't take malevolent intent or corruption for the economy to break down from self dealing. Natural human instinct is to repay debt and honour family, and those are good traits, but inside government those good traits become bad because they work against the common good.
    Further the natural fact that information is extremely valuable means that over time power and wealth will consolidate into the government because people closer to policy are closer to the decisions that will affect the economy. All the insider trading regulation in the world is powerless to prevent this.
    TL;DR: it's not a problem of bad people having power, it's a problem of power inherently in a command economy.

  • @taddunn7515
    @taddunn7515 6 років тому

    IDK what you can do about this, but please try to get all of your videos subtitled. I love these videos and they have been helpful but they are easy to watch at 1.5 speed when in a late night AP Euro grind provided they have the subtitles. Anyways great videos and thank you.

  • @kaykhosrow3263
    @kaykhosrow3263 Рік тому

    hello, I had just seen this video, and am wondering, is there any advantages of Mercantilism? because in this video it is mostly shown as bad thing, but then why mercantilistic economies like of France or of England (before switching to free market) was growing a lot and became biggest industries and grew both their economy and power by a lot and had decreased poverty?

  • @donnelldancy6177
    @donnelldancy6177 5 років тому

    Really helped... thanks

  • @rinamanan2628
    @rinamanan2628 8 років тому

    I did learned a lot and thanks

  • @PapaSmurff660
    @PapaSmurff660 9 років тому +2

    The silmarillion on the shelf... Its so tempting to let myself go to that world and enjoy myself.
    But the ap exam is tomorrow

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  9 років тому +1

      MY FAVORITE BOOK! :D

    • @PapaSmurff660
      @PapaSmurff660 9 років тому

      Tom Richey Its a masterpiece, glad you agree! Now only if they had AP middle earth history... I'd so get a 5

    • @WeisserPaladin
      @WeisserPaladin 9 років тому

      +Tom Richey Interesting. I found it to be a major pain to read, it's like the whole bible all over again but with exclusively foreign names you've never heard before. I respect Tolkien's thouroughness in creating a background to his novels but it is certainly not in the league of "favourite books". ;)

  • @scarymarys83
    @scarymarys83 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this video, very well explained. Off topic: you really resemble Matt Damon.

  • @mrunknown-ep5jw
    @mrunknown-ep5jw 4 роки тому

    Otherwise known as the monetary system, it is best to understand Diplomatic relations of other countries. money will always be the slave of human kind, but people think we cant live without it!!!

  • @sandynduwimana8781
    @sandynduwimana8781 9 років тому

    Great summary but I really wish you'd mentioned Africa when you were talking about colonies!

  • @ObiTheresaNkanim
    @ObiTheresaNkanim 11 місяців тому +1

    Thanks alot

  • @RuthCuadrado
    @RuthCuadrado 7 років тому

    Wow! mark Whalberg knows his mercantilism theory!

  • @AbandonedMaine
    @AbandonedMaine 8 років тому

    For clarification, Mercantilism is a slander by the hack writers of the British Empire. Cameralism or the other varient, Dirigism is what it is properly called. Developing a merchant system and a system of shipping was an aspect of the total approach.

  • @nicolatschan3539
    @nicolatschan3539 8 років тому +4

    Clear, short, comprehensive! I learned more in 18 minutes of watching this, than I learned while reading the entire article on wikipedia. Thank you very much!
    Greethings from Switzerland :)

  • @falcontube2023
    @falcontube2023 2 роки тому +1

    Nice t shirt

  • @js_guyman
    @js_guyman Рік тому

    Notes for myself:
    14:55 or 15:12-15:53 colonizers suck raw resources from colonies, and sell manufactured goods to them

  • @Anjays
    @Anjays 5 років тому

    I love you for this

  • @jackc.5271
    @jackc.5271 4 роки тому

    Oh my god this video was so boring. Didn't hold my attention at all, john green is much better.

  • @gabo1841997
    @gabo1841997 5 років тому

    So Mercantilism operated under the same assumptions as Socialism does. No wonder why both create so little wealth.

  • @newsheed11
    @newsheed11 3 роки тому

    All hail Tom Richey, great job

  • @jammieflank6296
    @jammieflank6296 9 років тому +2

    ขอบคุณค่ะ it's help me a lot !

  • @mrstickybuns
    @mrstickybuns 7 років тому +1

    great video, cool shirt

  • @nicholasdepaola3740
    @nicholasdepaola3740 Рік тому

    It’s like Theo Von quit comedy and taught history instead

  • @idomerkelable
    @idomerkelable 4 роки тому

    is the patent industry based on Mercantilism ?

  • @sch4891
    @sch4891 3 роки тому

    in mercantilism royalty was the gov under capitalism the corporations are

  • @TrailsOfSaint
    @TrailsOfSaint 7 років тому

    May be u should interchange the size of screen with explaination to you. That would be better to make points at d same time while listening.