"Oceans Give, Oceans Take": Their role in climate change
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
- As greenhouse gases warm the Earth, our oceans play a significant role in absorbing heat that helps regulate rising temperatures. But as writer and narrator Robert Krulwich explains, there is a huge price to pay for heating the oceans. He explains why in this first of a series of "CBS Sunday Morning" video essays, based on the work of Aatish Bhatia. Animation directed and designed by Nate Milton. Music by Buck St. Thomas.
"CBS Sunday Morning" features stories on the arts, music, nature, entertainment, sports, history, science and Americana, and highlights unique human accomplishments and achievements. Check local listings for CBS Sunday Morning broadcast times.
Subscribe to the "CBS Sunday Morning" UA-cam channel: bit.ly/20gXwJT
Get more of "CBS Sunday Morning": cbsn.ws/1PlMmAz
Follow "CBS Sunday Morning" on Instagram: bit.ly/23XunIh
Like "CBS Sunday Morning" on Facebook: bit.ly/3sRgLPG
Follow "CBS Sunday Morning" on Twitter: bit.ly/1RquoQb
Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
One of the best explanations of what’s happening to our world, thank you for sharing
Thoughtfully researched and articulated! Thank you for this exceptional educational and engaging piece! I am sharing it with friends, family, and fellow educators at all levels! I know they will find as worthy to share as I did! May we see more pieces like it in the near future. Any chance picture books, Ted talks, and more videos coming our way?!
We have a couple more episodes on the way, stay tuned. Thanks for watching and sharing!
Picture book is a terrific idea
All I have to say is “Wow”. Great video! Plain and to the point. I am going to share this link with other people. It needs to be seen!
I love Robert Krulwich! Radiolab is not the same without him. If this is his new gig, I’m all for it!
This is such a clear and concise explanation of what's going down now with our planet. Tho' it's hard not to think the human race will wait till it's too late to try and actually do something major to combat the situation.🌍
Great one CBS. Keep them coming, need all the education we can get about our predicament...
Oh, I have missed Robert! Please, please, bring him back again..... RadioLab was amazing, but, this is more of the voice and knowledge that we all need to hear. More of Robert, please!!!!
The sad fact is that as much as many people (who believe in man-made climate change) think it is possible to mitigate the approaching disaster most have no understanding of the acidificaton of the oceans and how much oceans have heated up. Both of those are facts that can not be reversed in decades, only centuries. i.e. Even with a cessation of CO2 production AND removing "legacy" CO2 from the atmosphere we still have those huge oceans making uncomfortable climate for us for centuries.
So are you saying that there is nothing we can do, so let’s continue on just as we were?
Excellent characterization of climate change. I wish they would play this daily in all demographics. In 100 years people will say -we didn’t think it was that serious. We didn’t know. Why didn’t anyone research this? They did. It just wasn’t politically popular. Sad.
100 years?! More like 15. All in the name of greed.
@@michaelscot4816 AOC said in a speech that the world will end in 15 years. That was about two years ago.
The problem is thus nonsense us popular.
With the LEFT
@tahoe twilight hahaha good one!
What what a comedian.
Guess the voice command slipped up..wow!
@tahoe twilight I have no idea what your talking about and I'm pretty sure you don't either.
Brilliant and beautiful! Everyone should watch this...schools, etc., very educational. Loved it.
Judish, humans are pushing earth to a new norm and eventually a mass extinction. There are parts of earth where large amount of people, agriculture, wild life and pets are dying from drought and heat wave and heat stroke. Coal, Oil and Natural gas "carbon" is what caused the last mass extinction 55 million years ago and humans are burning and pushing that carbon back into the atmphere. Currently humans are burning a record 34 billion tons of carbon+oxygen = co2 into the atmphere. Judith, the PETM of 55 million year or mass extinction was 100 times slower, lasted five to 10,000 years and eventually made life on earth uninhabitable. Humans need to depopulate, the Economy needs to decouple and the brakes on the economy need to slow down. Billionaires need to be banned making a profit from earth and other humans.
I found this quite enlightening. This would make an excellent Ted-Ed video. Thank you.
Our earth is in trouble, but it can be saved by everyone. Start simple. Don’t waste our natural resources. Number one. Don’t run water unless you use it.
OK Mary, thank you.
Living here in Hawaii, 2000m miles from the nearest landmass, we have experienced unusual winter weather patterns all this spring.
This is a great segment. Would be excellent for the classroom
Oceans are vital because they:
🗺make up 70% of Earth’s surface
🫁 produce 80% of the oxygen we breathe
🐠 house 80% of all life on Earth
At the same time:
🎣98.5% of the ocean is open to fishing fleets
Eating less seafood is one of the most effective ways to protect marine animals and ocean ecosystems.
This was a great lesson. However it makes me so angry how everyday i think of how i can reduce my footprint on earth, i raised my sons to care about our earth and they have taught their children the same. Yet! There are so many folks that are selfish and dont care at all. Like big corporations. Politicians dont care. So discouraging.
That's so beautiful Animated, truly one of the best, Great video
The best illustrative reporting I've seen in a long time!
As "Her Deepness" Sylvia Earle says, "No Ocean; No Us." Such a crystal-clear video to add to "Ocean" Playlists.👏🏽🌊🙏🏽
Definitely going to use this in my classroom! So well explained and very engaging! More of this, please!
They lost me when they said scientists have weighed all the water on earth without explaining how.
@@Nepthu 100% through mathematics. Do we need to count as fast as super computers, or perhaps the trillions of operations super computers do, per second, in order to come up with computers that do that? Do we need to have, FIRST, been to L2 (Lagrangian Point 2), roughly 1 million miles away from earth, in order to send a space craft or a space telescope there?
No.
We used basic knowledge of Newtonian physics, modern and ancient rocketry knowledge, knowledge of General Relativity (about time differentials near or away from massive objects like the moon, the earth, the sun, etc., which DISTORTS space and time)...
Do you need to use a bucket to take out all of the water of Lake Michigan or Lake Superior or Lake Erie... before you know "exactly" how many buckets there are in each lake? No.
You use the best surveying methods, using the best tools (sonar, laser, old fashion sticks, a real bucket to scoop up one real bucket of water to see its density and volume size, etc), and you estimate how large each body of water is, how deep on average they are, etc. and you use elementary school math to help you come to a good approximation as to how many buckets each lake holds.
Scientists don't only know to very precise degree how much water the earth have; they know how many atoms the earth has... how many atoms there are in the known universe, etc. The margins they get it "wrong" are so small, they're not important.
If you had $5B and you're off by $5,000 in your accountancy, would you be that terribly unhappy? Would you spend hours or days looking for that 1/100 of a cent-worth on the $100 dollar bill?
I am a retired teacher but I thought the same thing. I would show it to my students during Earth Day/Week
@@kiabtoomlauj6249 Wow! What a reply!
I am man from Poland. I understand now.
This was fantastic! I’m sending link to remind to show to my science students next year. Thank you!
It is so nice to hear the voice of Robert Krulwich he’s so entertaining and interesting. He tells a great story.
Best video I’ve seen in a while. Perfect for kids.
Love this. I'm hoping since it's a series future segments will include what are the practical solutions to turn this around.
Isn't about the fossil fuels? Everything points to that, doesn't it? But that means...oh no...we have to reduce our dependency and change our lifestyle!
Every living soul must watch this
forget space exploration ( It does have value) but we should be doing much more research about our oceans and climate
Great explanations !
ENOUGH!!!
Beautifully put
I knew that voice way familiar,...We love Robert & miss him on RadioLab!
Great video
I’m going to show this to my students. Great video.
Don’t do that to those poor kids. They’ve suffered enough.
@@user-zb1zg5ql9o Climate change is a huge scam designed to propagandize fear and global economic control since the leftists can’t do it by force. Our kids are the most susceptible but you probably already know that. Earth’s Oceans have heated up AND cooled down by 10-20X as much degrees F over the millennia - regardless of what humans do. That’s the reality. Teach our kids real life skills like economics, reading, math and oh how to avoid government manipulation.
@@user-zb1zg5ql9o Uh huh…except you already exposed your intent and clear bias with your previous statement about how “positive” this scientifically unproven message is for kids. It’s no coincidence that it’s a cartoon either. Remember human driven climate change is still a theory. The author’s agenda here is clear and pushing it on his intended targets will only serve to make children more agitated and mentally ill. So easier to control basically.
Please don't.
It's all just theories like evolution.
Guesses
Don’t want children to be more educated about climate change than either of you?
Please make more of these!
EXCELLENT!!!
THANK YOU FOR THIS AMAZING REPORTING !!!!!!
Its easy to turn a blind eye and say theres no climate change, but we must reality if we want to preserve our planet for next generations. We’ve been too selfish and ignorant
We also need to hold our government partly responsible for this. Back in the 60s they set off thousands of nuclear weapons in our oceans. They even set a nuke off in our atmosphere that caused a massive radiation belt that wrapped around the diameter of the earth. Look up operation starfish or something along those lines. They have yet to be held accountable for their complete disregard of the planets well being.
I know that voice! I've missed that voice ❤️
BRILLANT! Will share video with others
Bravo
Way too simplistic. Good short video for a 3rd grade science class.
Unfortunately for a large number of Americans, that's the level of science they can comprehend.
Sometimes less is more.
Brilliant! Thank you.
Enlightening and educational. 👏👏
Love this thank you!!!!!
CBS News needs to talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants tress
Should be shown in every elementary school 🎒
You leftists and your propaganda.
And more concerning about the topics tho
Thank you for sharing.
Beautifully put👏🤞🏻✌
This is killing me - WHAT is the last word spoken in this piece? I cranked the sound on my TV and rewound several times and could not make it out. Tried Closed Captioning, wasn't available (I was watching via DVR). Came online thinking I could find a CC version here - no go. Gaaaah! I must know this final word, lol!
Anyone catch it?
enough
We have to save the climate!!!
We're gonna lose everything.
EXCELLENT
So we’ll done! The writing, design and animation is spectacular!
🐋 🐙 🐠 🌊
We must protect our oceans. Acidic oceans mean no fish, for starters.
They ain't have to do that fish like that 5:03
What is truly amazing is that most people do not actually know how much of the earths atmosphere is made up of CO2 ? Ask yourself that question,,,,I will give you a hint = not much at all
Omg. That was so good
It's not finished.
Oh so this video was actually just about the oceans taking a long time to heat. Well that doesn't matter, because every joule of heat you put into the ocean is going to be a joule of heat that is still there. It only means that even if you turned off the global warming now, that it would still keep things hotter than it should be for that much longer. But no I'm not impressed by converting it into 5 atomic bombs per second, because that is over the entire surface of the Earth, all 200 million square miles of it, or 150 million square miles covered by water.
climates change everyday
6:58 To the Loons of Massachusetts when Sunday Morning continues
i love robert krulwich but this leaves out any mention of el niño’s and la ninas , the PDO , the AMO , the fact that tide gauges show no acceleration of sea level rise , the “ adjustments “ nasa makes to argo temperatures . this is a highly oversimplified one sided view of a very complicated and little understood phenomenon . it did explain some interesting science in RK’s usual entertaining and thought provoking way however .
the planet will survive. humans, probably not
speaking of oceans... why are they at the same level as when I was a child 40 years ago? Why is florida not under water yet?
That's capitalism for ya.
They lost me when they said scientists have weighed all the water on the earth without explaining how.
You already got a detailed explanation in another thread. Short answer: math
The Earth is cooler w the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer.
To perform as advertised the GHGs require "extra" energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body.
The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible.
No greenhouse effect, no GHG heating, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.
You’re actually claiming the earth is cooler with an atmosphere, GHGs, albedo, and there is no green house effect? You don’t seem to understand basic physics
@@AA-vi1cc
My BSME plus 30 lucrative years of application say I've got a good handle on that physics thang. As opposed to the physics illiterate MSM voices in your head. Here's the long version. Last I checked the links work.
Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GreenHouse Gases and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K).
That’s NOT what the Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory says.
EVIDENCE:
RGHE theory “288 K w - 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud.
Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies”
Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth”
UCLA Diviner lunar mission data
Int’l Space Station HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site)
Astronaut MMU w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center)
Fact 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a black body.
EVIDENCE:
According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a black body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors. See ua-cam.com/video/0Jijw7-YG-U/v-deo.html
Fact 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a black body.
EVIDENCE:
As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
For the experimental write up see:
principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/
CONCLUSION:
No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.
@@nxgrs74 why do you assume there is no up/down “back” radiative loop in the green house effect when it’s a fundamental part of it? You should read “Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing” by Kramer et al. (2021) for direct global observations of the green house gas effect
@@AA-vi1cc
The up/down loop requires "extra" energy violating LoT 1 and the loop is 100% efficient, moves energy from cooler to warmer w/o work violating LoT 2.
"Radiative forcing" is a version of caloric and phlogiston, a made-up term to explain what does not exist.
Here's the long version.
Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GreenHouse Gases and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K).
That’s NOT what the Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory says.
EVIDENCE:
RGHE theory “288 K w - 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud.
Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies”
Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth”
UCLA Diviner lunar mission data
Int’l Space Station HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site)
Astronaut backpack life support w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center)
Fact 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a black body.
EVIDENCE:
According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a black body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors. See ua-cam.com/video/0Jijw7-YG-U/v-deo.html
Fact 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a black body.
EVIDENCE:
As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
For the experimental write up see:
principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/
CONCLUSION:
No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.
@@nxgrs74 glad to see your copy/paste disinformation spam reply was automatically deleted. There is no extra energy, you purposefully misrepresent what the green house gas effect is and use calculations using incorrect values to give the illusion you that have any credibility. Your garage “experiment” is published on a site that specifically spreads disinformation on the green house gas effect, your video link was to your own page, and you are a known spammer on many scientific and fringe forums. I suggest that anyone else reading this report this person’s account for spam/misleading
''climate change?
Problem given with no solution offered. Bleh.
This is interesting and thought provoking... But this planet has been going through cycles for eons.. If you look back in time this planet was once a. giant ball of ice... and it thawed and it heated up.. And the volcanoes have had lot to do with the climate too...oh and the sun???... Well.... be thanful it's way out there.... 🌎
True. Of course humans, other animals, our current land masses WERE NOT HERE THEN.
10 years.
We only have 10 years!
They keep saying......
this is fluff.....a fluff piece...yes the oceans captured heat....but its done now the damage is done....soon we humans will get what we deserve....you got it,,,,the bill is coming due ,
Uhhhh no, it's NOT done! If you think it's bad now, well....
That is some pretty powerful propaganda there.....
Afraid to actually read a research paper about it? Come on you’ll probably understand something
Celsius does not represent the energy in the terrestrial system, Kelvin does.
And 288 K to 289 K is trivial.
enough of what ?
Wow. 1 degree warmer over 122 years. What a joke
Thanks for showing us your lack of understanding and unreasonable inability to TRY to understand.
You clearly didn’t watch because it shows how significant that change is.
Not a joke. In your lifetime you will witness how things fall apart. The indications of impending irreversible crisis are plain to see... if you open your eyes.
Karl, yours is the kind of denial that prevents us from actually dealing with the problem.
did you miss the point on purpose?
Nothing lasts forever. The Bible says the world will end. Now science simply agrees.
The Bible didn't mean that the earth will literally end/be completely destroyed.
During the times of Noah, the Great Flood destroyed wicked humans, not the literal earth.
The Bible also said that the earth will be here forever.
Ecclesiastes 1:4
“One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.”
Psalms 37:29
“The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever.”
Isaiah 45:18
“...God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited....”
So, although humans have damaged the earth, they will never destroy it, such as in a nuclear war or due to abuse; the Bible did say that God will destroy humans who are destroying the earth:
Revelation 11:18
"...thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants... and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.”
what a horrible analogy and image, Hiroshima bombs (also most Americans, narrator included, have no idea how to pronounce Hiroshima. It's not "-shEEma" but "-shima"
The oceans are saying "enough" heat.. why or how? this animated propaganda explains nothing at the end.
Geeze. This is all just theories.
Like evolution.
Unprova le and a theory at best
Are you asserting that, to scientists, "theory" means the same as "conjecture"?
Due to the necessity of falsifiability, a scientific theory is the PINNACLE of scientific achievement. It takes an absurd amount of time and effort to produce sufficient evidence for a hypothesis to become a theory.
Facts are the produced by mathematics alone.
Do you raise the same stink when you encounter references to Atomic Theory? Have you never questioned why, after all this time, it's still referred to as Atomic Theory rather than "Atomic Fact"?
Is baseless climate change denial your job? Does it pay well?
They cannot show you proof so they have to make a cartoon......
But hey. It's all true righ?
Go read a research paper for once if you want proof