I went into the trial just thinking it was all him… I live in the U.K. and although I did nt follow the case here, I thought she was abused. But OMG having watched her on the stand as a witness, she seems very toxic and abusive. The more I listen to her, the more I am glad it was televised and we can now all see the actual Amber
@Rachel - are y’all saying that the originally aired version of the interview has since been edited down? I had no idea! If that is what you’re saying, is it because they’re backpedalling to see face for Amber? If you could spare a minute to educate lil’ol me, I’d be oh-so happy and grateful!
@@virginiaanndavidson178 The teaser bits that were played during the week leading up to the full interview had elements that were cut out in Friday's edit!
Her fans had the same opportunity to come out in support of her. There were very few, and i wonder if the trial changed their minds. If they are DV survivors, they likely did.
An argument has been made that AH was exaggerating for effect, and / or making an allusion to a scene from a Monty Python comedy. If one further assumes that Dr. Curry's diagnoses are correct, then familiarization with these disorders would make it quite understandable that such intent would not be recognized or understood.
That's exactly what I've been saying for months! The MSM would've been all over the people holding those fictitious signs and further, her security would NEVER have allowed her to accept flowers from a fan of they weren't flowers she sent to herself! 'Course she also lined up paid "fans" to scream when she came to her vehicle so we all know there nothing this woman won't do to avoid looking as pitiful as she did!! I feel like Samantha Guthrie didn't put her foot down as the interviewer & just let AH have her way. She did that in court to us or no answers, so why not in an interview she was likely paid to give. I'd have thought NBC didn't get their money worth but that beeps I learned they were going to be AH shills! In interested to see what changes now that Camille Vasquez is on board at NBC. I did boycott NBC Tim they hired her so I'll def be watching. She doesn't pull punches & let anyone walk all over her. That's going to be fun to watch!!
Wait a minute! She says she’s not a perfect victim? The only time she showed any true emotion in the trial was when Camille called her a victim and she aggressively exclaimed that she was NOT a victim!! Everything is a contradiction and/or an inconsistency. I can’t
@@sporkfoon Yes, I was so moved by Rob from Law and Lumber's passionate encouragement that victims NOT allow Heard and MSM's BS talking point about this to dissuade anyone from coming forward and asking for help. Yes, disbelief of victims is a serious and pervasive problem that we need to address in our culture. But per Rob--who actually works on these cases on behalf of victims--that does NOT mean you need to be "perfect" to be believed, and does NOT mean you need "mountains of evidence." The truth has power, as we saw in this case.
@@oldenglish. I suspect from all her behaviors put together that she identified with her abuser growing up, as some victims do. In addition, she said her father explicitly taught her to be tough and not show emotion when he had her help him break horses.
Them editing the teaser clips into the “full” video are why we needed cameras in the court room. It’s clear the main stream media is pushing Amber’s narrative no matter what the jury decided
So true. I was praising Savannah's interview from the clips, but once the full version was released I was so disappointed. They just let her spew her lies.
@@hez01 I know this is so disappointing that they cut out and edit badly, but remember Savanna has bosses and we don’t really know how much she pushed and asked, because they are edit it out
SHE took JDs voice for 6 years. SHE wasn't telling people calling JD a wife beater to stop its unfair but is now saying when she found guilty in court. Its all about HER. She NEVER called herself a victim she testified under oath yet says she's a victim 3x in her interview.
🙌🙌 Exaaaactly! Well said! I don't have any sympathy for her! Even if she loses her entire career, all her money, all of her supporters (last time I checked, there are not many left, but still)... She did it to herself! She is vile, selfish, narcissistic, cruel and finally she is facing the consequences of her idiotic actions!
@@kbn7160 Let's be honest, she has got a problem, maybe more than 1, but my sympathy is gone. TBH like Alyte says, all you need is to listen to the audio to realise the nature of the abuse in their relationship. And it is not just what they say, but how they say it. JD is sticking up for himself, but she is controlling the conversation, sometimes leading it in unexpected directions and preventing JD from leaving it. It makes me feel more sorry for Whitney who has had this her entire life. No wonder JD still cares deeply for her IMO.
@@psychologicalprojectionist Ya, just because people have personal problems, doesnt mean we have to have sympathy for them, she reached a point of No Return in my eyes, I just watch the circus unfold now.
I’m not sure anyone has pointed this out, but when discussing the Jury, AH is solely focused on “Social Media”, because it was against her. AH never mentions the Mainstream Media, which the Jury could have also saw, that was very much Pro-AH, heck, they could’ve saw something talking about the UK trial verdict. AH isn’t worried about that because it could’ve influenced the Jury in a way that she wanted. AH likes to talk about “Fairness”, but like all narcissists, “what’s fair to AH” is all that matters.
Such a good point you raise here. Amber loves to throw the fair word around, it's there on the tapes too and as you say means for her to get what she wants while pretending she's compromising.
Wow! Great point. I can see though how generally people would spend more time seeing social media coverage vs. traditional media. But, as someone who followed the case due to it popping up in my feed, I definitely saw both social media creators AND mainstream media videos. So it is very interesting that AH didn't mention the jury's possible exposure to mainstream media.
She's focused so much on it because of her ego. Nevermind that it was her lawyers who brought in the social media angle and amber Terd hashtags, she even told the jury to look her up online to see. So delusional 🤦♀️
As a daughter of a narcissist mother, I'm confident that AH will want to tell her daughter as early as possible for the pitty party. Her daughter will be her ultimate source of narcissistic fuel. Poor baby girl.
I’m concerned for her health as well… Heard punched Johnny hard enough to bruise and even MUTILATED him. That little girl is in serious danger. Doubly so since she’s so young and fragile
@@dinkalicious The child doesn't even need to be prettier, she just needs to be pretty and young. It all just hinges on whether Ambers thinks her own beauty has diminished enough by old age according to her own insecurities, and what about her daughter she values. But hopefully she doesn't show that kind of narcissistic bullying while her child is under her protection.
"I did start a physical fight" and then claims that when you're in an abusive dynamic, that you take the blame for things you shouldn't. Can we play the part just after that where she interrupts him, talks over him and starts yelling "you're a BABY! YOU ARE SUCH A BABY, JOHNNY!" Abuse victims don't taunt their perpetrators like that. Complete liar.
After watching her testimony and interviews, it’s pretty clear to me that she isn’t a particularly bright person and doesn’t have a realistic theory of mind for other people. I don’t think she’s stupid per se, but I think she doesn’t understand that others can see through her contradictory statements and assertions. Listening to the audio of her taunting, berating, and abusing Depp, and her mealy mouthed insistence that she was “negotiating” with a man she was “scared” of, is nothing short of breathtaking. In all of the audio produced, there simply wasn’t any fear in her voice. She wasn’t afraid of Johnny. Fear doesn’t follow “monsters” room to room to chide and insult them. Bullies do that. And I’m sorry, but I don’t believe that Ms Heard has ever taken a punch to the face by a man. Ever. I also don’t believe she knows the dangers of broken glass. If she had, she would know that getting your shit rocked by a *single* blow to the jaw, cheek, eye, or nose leaves a serious impression on you, and tends to leave a serious mark that makeup isn’t going to easily cover up. Black eyes take a while to go down too. I’ve had my share of black eyes and have had my nose broken for me twice. And no one was wearing heavy rings when I was busy using my nose to stop their fists! She conjures up a bad movie with her nonsense, where the heroine is pummeled by a flurry of strikes before being dragged across broken glass, yet emerging without a scratch on her. Physics and biology simply doesn’t work like she thinks. And it’s insulting to all of us that she thought that she would be taken seriously. I’m grateful the jury saw through her blather and hope Mr. Depp is on his way to healing.
As someone who fought for 17 years in court against my abuser it was crippling to be there to try and get all the information out. Panic attacks at even the sound of his voice. Trying to not be around them at all. Literally having many times when I was ushered into a safe room where I was enclosed myself and my lawyers would have to come tell me what was going on because I physically couldn’t be in the same room… when she said I’m not a victim was chilling to me because it really showed a true abusers personality! I am sure I’m not the only one who had flashbacks to their own abuse caused by what amber said or did on stand and in audio
I think those who have been abused, can easily spot the abuse in this situation. Others who haven't experienced abuse, still form opinions, but it's not spotted immediately. It's been helpful to read comments about people who have overcome an abusive situation and can point out the red flags that would otherwise be overlooked. God bless those who are in abusive relationships, and/or have overcome the situation. It's really easy to just be silent, and it's easy to see why someone might stay in the situation rather than stand up for themselves.
I know what it's like to be afraid of someone you love. When I heard those recordings where she's taunting him I can't believe she was afraid in anyway of that man. Begging to stay in those hostile moments and fight it out certainly did not tract with my experience at all. I really hope you've found the peace and happiness you deserve 💙
@@shannonEGBOK hoping I have she’s over 18 now so I’m hoping it’s never going to happen again. I hope you have found the same peace you wished me as well 🥰
Same. Not as long (still ongoing), but same reactions. Just THINKING about needing to leave the house in the next 3, 4, 8, hours was enough to drive up my pulse & breathing rate until I actually got home. Exhausting is what that is. She seemed to do just fine doing all those speeches & getting all those awards & acting in movies just fine.
People who haven't followed this case think she is so brave for having testified. Those of us who know the truth cannot believe she keeps telling the same lies!! We're confused, disappointed, and infuriated!
She thought she would win because she’s never been held accountable. She is finally getting just a taste of what Johnny has been dealing with for the past 6 years!!!
The irony is that she will never pay JD a cent & got a TON of publicity from this trial. (Any press is good press.) She basically got away with all of this scott free.
NBC should be embarrassed for cutting this interview to try to soften AH and hoping people that didn't watch the court case will believe her innocence. Especially since Savannah is a lawyer and didn't explain to the audience the freedom of speech is not slandering and harming another person. I hope the audience used common sense and can see through AH smoke screen.
This could literally be used as a tool to illustrate what gaslighting looks like. She warps reality until you are left scratching your head. The audio recordings between she and Johnny are replete with her tying complex knots out of the reality of the situation, while he- sounding increasingly exhausted- attempts to have a rational conversation with her. It’s no wonder he immersed himself in substances, he was likely white-knuckling lucidity after their very first conflict.
That’s exactly why, contrary to Amber’s claims, I feel so vindicated by this trial. She is so much like my abuser and I still don’t know if either them believe their own BS. I just know that feeling of begging to leave to get some space to calm down only to be treated like that’s a bad thing, those desperate attempts to keep my head on straight while the other person is escalating themselves by deciding everything you do is against them… I know what it’s like to finally break down and lose myself completely and I hate that Johnny and anyone else that’s experienced it is. And when people say they abused each other it bothers me for the same reason- no one can go through having a partner this abusive with out breakdowns. It’s not abuse at that point, it’s from the abuse. Like live with someone who will decide your breathing is a sigh and that sighing is enough to scream at you for literal hours for YEARS and tell me you never snapped- it’s impossible to meet that standard.
@@sourgreendolly7685 you just triggered a memory for me! The sigh accusations! "I didn't sigh, I was just breathing!" Back and forth until you start questioning if you really did sigh! Maybe I did, I no longer know! A huge argument...over BREATHING!
So immensely disappointed in Dateline and how much they edited. They released clips and then edited the full version removing more damaging information that she said. Hard to trust anything that comes from them now.
Social media supported her initially. I supported her initially. As the facts came out and it showed she was lying it made me furious because Im a survivor of domestic abuse and I hate when people lie about it because it make it so hard for true survivors to come out and tell their story.
Alyte, your insightful, knowledgeable and compassionate perspective is WONDERFUL. And your elegant and eloquent use of language is an absolute delight. Thank you for the great value of your observations and the example of your open, honest and loving heart. Your influence is a positive force in our world. We really need the example of your energy. Respect and gratitude!
How can a witness "win" a court case? Didn't she claim that she "prevailed" in the UK case? I believe Elaine said something similar in her interviews as well didn't she? What is with these people? Thanks for setting the record straight Alyte.
AH is desperately trying to get the reports of recording of what she said had happened, rather than the clinician’s diagnostic opinion, into the public arena. My therapist insisted that I have my injuries documented by medical professionals because they are mandated reporters, - she was a therapist but not a Medical Doctor. It forced me to face my reality over time, I needed to remove my children and I from the situation and be safe. It’s amazing just how effective the system is if you allow it to run its course. As someone who faced DV I felt it was my fault and I was alone. By following the advise of my therapist, I not only created an evidentiary trail, it also placed people around me who were trained in breaking into the psyche of the victim, and empowered me to see the truth. 1, I was not alone, 2 I deserved better, 3, there were many who were willing to help, 4, there were people who would keep me safe, 5, there are people who will stand beside me hold me up and ensure I’m heard, 6, the people around me also looked out for my children. Even with all that support, I would never poke the person who was aggressive towards me, as I still fear them. If her therapist believed she was in danger due to DV, would have either reported it by mandate if a MD, or created a medical trail. If she was supportive of AH’s narrative AH would have had her testify.
@@SacredForest347 you miss my point. There is no way on earth, I would testify or write an opinion piece against my abuser. Yes I speak out against family violence, but in no way shape or form do I give any information as to why. I have the support around me to know that he can never hurt me or my kids again but I’m not chancing it. It would be a kick in the face for all those who patiently and diligently worked to teach me I was not to blame, that there were many who would stand with and around me, I just had to take a leap of faith. Why would you once free from your oppressor, goad them to anger without reason. I was terrified when he threatened to take my kids from me, and yes I did risk his ire, as I had been assured by the social workers, the legal team and all those entrusted to keep me safe that he would not win, there was too much violence. You know what they were right, he soon gave up the fight, when he realised that he had to get to me through a lawyer, he quit because he was just a bully, but I still would not goad him without cause.
It cracks me up when she’s say she was “lending” her voice to a bigger cultural conversation… I never asked to borrow her voice. I didn’t even know who the heck she was! Lol ugh 😩
On Spidey’s recent review of this interview, Christine Pykles pointed out that in UK trial, Heard as a witness pushed for and was granted special permission to sit in the court every day, hearing what evidence was given, before she had to speak. I haven’t read the transcript yet to verify this.
I thought Christine said she was denied that? AH originally didn't want to testify, but then when she finally agreed she pushed for that special permission...
It is true. I remember that it was not a usual thing. She and Whitney got special permission to be in the court. They had to be told to stop texting each other. They also changed their testimony because of what others said on the stand and evidence given..even then their stories didn't match.
@@zottelhuehs6375 Got it. I had to go back and relisten to that part of Spidey's stream. The moment where Christina (not Christine) mentioned being granted special permission, she kinda mumbled it so it wasn't very clear. But she also didn't expand further on it, so, in combination with the mumble, I assumed AH wasn't permitted. Thanks!
Alyta, the reason why her response to the instigation question seems vague and confusing is because they cut out significant portions of that response and spliced what was left into a sem-coherent sentence. The teaser clips released in the days leading up to this “full” interview showed very different and potentially embarrassing answers to Savannah’s questions, especially related to this one in particular.
I am shocked that Alyte missed the Frankenstein-splice of AH's "black and white" statement (around 18:00). Granted, it was a masterful cut, and would be nearly impossible to detect if one hadn't seen the uncut versions from the Today Show, but I would have thought Alyte would have seen something about it either on twitter, or from other lawtubers, even if it didn't jump straight out at her here. I was not expecting her to breeze right past it.
The notes were excluded because they are hearsay. The therapist could have testified. Depp did not object. But Bonnie, the therapist, did not testify. Why? Heard chose not to call her. Hypothesis: the notes are fake, and Bonnie would have said so.
My hypothesis: They weren't taken "in real time" as she claims. I heard this is what she told to her therapist after 2018. If she did call her, everyone would know that. If she chooses not to call her she can pretend to the public that this corroborates her story better.
Dr Hughes referenced the notes repeatedly on the stand so they weren't exactly a secret during the trial. I would like to know how they proved they came from this other therapist.
@@EwokingDeadGirl Correct. The therapist notes and the text messages were commented on in both Curry and Hughes testimony, so it seems they were allowed for review by the experts, just not for the jury.
Exactly. Handwritten notes can be made literally at any time. I wouldn’t be surprised if she spent a day writing in notebooks to make a fake paper trail
To be honest, the thing that infuriates me the most is she claiming that she has no voice anymore. She wants her voice back. They took her voice. I'm sorry, fucking what? Imagine being an actual victim, living with an abusive partner. You've been slowly isolated from all of your own friends and family. All the acquaintances you have left are your partners friends, which would 100% take their side were you to tell them about the abuse. And don't even think about going online and telling strangers about the abuse. No, you'll be beaten to death. Or driven to suicide. Either way, you'll pay for that act. You might not even see it as abuse anymore. You've been slowly suffocated of all your sense of self worth. You think you deserve it. It's your fault. It's not even abuse anymore. It's just... Life. THAT is not having a voice. And that is a reality for millions of men and women out there. Now, being able to speak openly and freely about it and being heard by millions, if not billions at this point, without any real danger, except legal, IS having a voice. Amber has an enormous platform. And to think that she, in her twisted world, thinks that she's the same as those truly without a voice is truly disgusting. And even if the abuse was true - even if Johnny 100% abused Amber - She still has a voice. She still has a very dedicated large group of dedicated fans. She still has reach. True victims could only dream of being heard and believed by at least one person.
of cause she still has a voice... and she is making money of it by doing those interviews, or is there anyone believing, she does them for free? AH is just a pathetic human being and a daily waste of oxygen...
You speak like one that has experienced abuse at the hands of another with a personality disorder. I'm so sorry you went through whatever it is that has given you such clear insights. Hope you're safe now, and doing ok
True. If she didn't have a voice she wouldn't have tweeted post trial and came on this interview (most likely paid to SPEAK) to echo what she claimed happened to her.
LISTENING TO HER SPEAK MAKES ME WANT TO THROW MY PHONE AT THE WALL 😩 “How could they believe me after 3 and a half week of all of this evidence???” Is what she should have said. I can’t do it.
Yes! She’s so cringy! Makes me throw up in my mouth to listen to her. I only saw the teasers not the full (redacted) interview and I couldn’t even stomach the teasers. Her whole presence at the trial was disgusting! And when johnnys lawyer went after her I was like “fist bump… get her!”
I wish JD lawyers brought in a medical expert to prove its physically impossible to hide a broken nose black eyes and split lip with makeup the day after
If anyone has ever had a cast on their arm they know , if they hit someone in the face with it not only once but repeatedly, it WILL cause serious damage to the skin.
Actually JD team did have a forensic pathologist expert as a rebuttal witness, but AH team did not call their expert. So JD team could not call their expert for rebuttal. I think they mentioned it via reading the proffers after or before closing arguments?
They didn’t need to, because her explanation was so ridiculous that no one would ever believe that a swollen and purple nose would magically look uninjured with some ice and makeup 😆
Every time she speaks she contradicts something she said before. That kind of behavior leads others to think she's not being honest. It's absolutely fascinating to watch an adult female do this. Plus, she is single highhandedly swinging the ME2Movement back towards reality. AND giving hope to hundred of thousands of men who have been ruined by lies. It's so much fun, and healing, to hear a female lawyer like you with your grounded legal conviction about this. Thank you, thank you thank you!
It's a big part of why people who watch more than 30 minutes of her speaking come to distrust her. Many people who support her just watch clips taken out of context or just read the articles that her PR team are pushing.
@@OceanHedgehog ... 🤔 wondering if most if not all supporters are between the ages of 9 thru 14 ( the ones who believe that Aquaman, Batman & other comic book characters are ALIVE & REAL living in a body of water or town near them 😳! (OR OTHERS that have been & will continue to PROFIT 💰 off the enormous amount of 💰 thrown at these "nonprofit" orgs🤔) My goodness this broad appears to be a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR in SERIOUS NEED of MENTAL HELP! Somebody please 🆘 AH so her CHILD HAS A CHANCE AT A SAFE & HEALTHY LIFE!
AH’s next sentence after “yes, I did start a physical fight” came after her saying “I wasn’t punching you, I was hitting you” and right before she says “you are such a baby, you’re a baby Johnny, grow up”. I wish Savannah would have read that whole passage to her. Of AH would have just said there’s some mysterious context we’re missing. She’s a liar & a gaslighter.
Well done! I particularly appreciate that you encouraged DV survivors to reach out for help and offered resources to do so. AH has done more to undermine MeToo movement and being a voice for people who have been abused/assaulted sexually or who have been victims of domestic abuse. Shame of her! Thank you for your resounding voice to truth and foe your insights and perspective. Love your channel.
Omg! “She’s trying to make fetch happen”. That was a great mean girls reference. I started watching the trial about week 3, and didn’t catch up to the missing two weeks until after the trial was over. I gotta say, as a DV and SA survivor I did not believe more than 1/16 of what she said.
If she really lost her voice she wouldn’t have been able to do the interview. You don’t know or understand what it really means to not have a voice AH. Not to mention that defamation had to be found WITH MALICE, and that was what was found. As for his exes, they came and gave sworn testimonies that he was never abusive. AH AND JD had the same private entrance and the only thing there was a gate. No media or “fans” were allowed beyond the gates or to block the gates. MSM would have made a big deal if there were horrible signs and shouts being made against AH and they didn’t say anything through out the trial. Also there are all kinds of witnesses that were there and can tell you that you were wrong. Not everyone in the gallery were fans. You even had fans of your own at one point. There were lawyers who were simply interested in the trial as that is there job, trials, and to see the lawyers. No one was allowed to talk in the gallery nor could they wear costumes or shirts that indicated who’s side they were on. Those who watched the trial could see this. The public saw her lying and not admitting to any faults throughout the whole trial. The UK trail was different in so many ways: a) AH wasn’t a party but a witness meaning she didn’t win anything as it wasn’t her case. b) because she was only a witness here level of evidence wasn’t as high. c) the legality is different as it is a different country. d) most of his evidence was denied. There was no negotiation; that was AH verbally assaulting him and admitting to her doing the physical abuse. She brought in lots of the audio herself and the clips were all longer than 30 seconds. Her lawyers even had the option to bring in longer clips yet they chose not too. She didn’t argue on the stand for anything but DV and SA, so don’t try to twist it or add more now. AH had no evidence to back up her story, and each story got more elaborate each time she told it as well as adding more events. Most, if not all, of her so called abuse would have demanded medical attention as well as days of not weeks of healing. AH had so many other inconsistencies in her stories and so called evidence. Stop with your twisting of the story about the donation you never made AH. A donation is not the same as a mortgage by any stretch of the imagination. Donation means give them the money then and there, especially when you said “I donated the money”. A mortgage is having a bank pay for the house in full and then you pay the bank back in the form of a loan and if you don’t pay it back you can get into trouble such as loosing the house. No one told her to make the donation. No one told her to announce it publicly that not only did she ALREADY donate the money but that she did it because she wanted nothing in the divorce. AH chose to do both and got caught in doing none of it. That’s all on her. And yes, a large part of a defamation case is all about a person’s credibility so don’t play dumb and act like credibility had nothing to do with it. If it wasn’t a publicity stunt then why wait so long after the divorce was finalized and have the timing of so close to her first major movie role as a superhero to publish it? That seems fishy. Yes AH, since you said you had pictures then they needed to match with the abuse you described. And not only did they not match the description, but for some events you had the same photos to represent two different dates. She never looked intimidated or scared to talk her supposed SA. AH never had medical records for any of them either and, again, based on her description of those events there would have to be medical records as the the injuries would have been too severe. And it would have taken weeks to recover from. Just because you say something happens doesn’t mean it happens. Her demeanor and attitude and even the words coming out of her mouth screamed being vindictive. How is AH allowed to give Dateline these so called therapist notes when her current court case hasn’t been closed out and she is appealing it? Therapy notes are more consider medical notes. Also, those so-called notes seem to be in the same handwriting as her handwriting in her’s and JD’s love notebook they shared. Not to mention therapy notes are not long, drawn out words and sentences but rather short, abbreviated notes that are quickly written because they are writing as the patient speaks. They also MUST include dates and times on their notes for their records. AH’s so called notes had none. It is also interesting how this therapist had years of hearing her story yet AH never said her therapist encouraged her to seek help or report it or helped her make a plan. AH had her therapist on her witness list but her team never brought her in. Dr. Hughes also referred to that therapist’s notes during her testify. Was there a trial by law held in the courtroom? Yes. Was there a trial by the public? Yes. Did the trial by public influence the trial in the courtroom? NO. And there is no evidence to state otherwise. Did the trial in the courtroom influence the trial by public? Yes. We were able to watch the trial from beginning to end and evaluate the witnesses and evidence on our own and make our own conclusion. Then when the public found you in the wrong we the people shared our opinion of you online just as our freedom of speech allows us to do. JD never “promised” any amount of humiliation according the the texts we saw, but simply said it would happen implying it would be because the truth would come out. If you’re going to quote sometime then quote it correctly. She had most of the world on her side for six years simply because she said (with no other evidence) she was the victim and then during the trial it came out she had been lying to us the whole time. Many people had turned their back on JD even though they were fans because of your accusations, they tried to “have your back”. Yes, the world is allowed to feel upset, angry, and hurt for being duped and lied to by you Ms. Heard for so long. And I do believe we the people would look you in the eye/face and tell you what we feel and think of you. Consequences of your actions, dear AH, isn’t always pleasant. AH, you do care what people think of you or you wouldn’t be doing the interview. You don’t want to keep your private life private as you leaked information, wrote an Op-Ed, and are doing interviews sharing details of your private life. Yes, I would tell you that your are being treated fair as this is exactly what you put JD through for six years. Are the extremists taking it too far, maybe; but it’s not the majority. Being called names is nothing. Being called out on your lies is nothing. AH, you have no evidence that any juror member did anything they weren’t supposed to do. Not everyone is attached to SM like AH seems to be. AH doesn’t even know if they have any or which SM accounts. Do not insult these people who had to give up almost two months of their lives to listen to your trial. AH didn’t take responsibility for anything. She tried to come off as perfect and perfect doesn’t exist. So yes, that attitude will impact how people see you AH. And that viewpoint point won’t be good. Also, there were at least 20 witnesses that weren’t on any one’s pay roll/family/friend list. Offended that AH considers “randos” or “average” people as beneath her. There is nothing about her that makes her better than anyone else! AH thinks so highly of herself that she assumes she has power over other DV cases. AH, you have no power over other cases or victims. Your case was all about you and JD (not to mention it was defamation case only) and EVERY CASE is different and evaluated as such! AH does not speak for anyone but herself. AH, you say you want to focus on being a mom and I’m sure you want to protect her (and that is admirable), yet you weren’t too concerned how two teenagers were going to have to grow up dealing with the mud you dragged their father in for the last six years while silencing his voice at the same time. Throughout the interview she kept changing the tense of her stories, rarely referred to herself as a victim but says victims react to or do things in third person (which implies she isn’t one) and even slips and says JD would step away (implying yet again that he is the victim). AH is even looking all over the place at times. She also would flip between first and third person (third person implies the person talking wasn’t there doing what was being talked about but simply an observer) and she flipped between present and past tense (implies lying because you cannot keep the story straight). AH needs real help, not just a therapist or psychiatrist who will simply listen to and placate her. It seems that JD has already been seeking help for his issues and is actually getting better. This was a trial between two people NOT social movements contrary to what AH and her team want to believe. This trial isn’t women v men. This also isn’t about taking the right to speak away from anyone but about giving voice to someone who had been silenced. This trial is about finding the truth. In a small way it was about an abuser and a victim. It was about how the stereotypes of who an abuser and victim is is not always right. Abuse doesn’t know gender. Abuse doesn’t know stereotypes. If people really want to make this ONE CASE about a movement (which it is not), then JD helped the movement as well as broadened it by showing how a (male) victim can come in with the odds stacked against them, stick to and tell the truth, and then be heard and come out the victor.
Going by the audio tapes and court, AH believes her voice should speak over all others, on and on, the only voice heard, until listeners agree to get a brief moment of silence. Living proof of nominative determinism.
It is so good to listen to your credible knowledgeable responses, Alyte. Like you, I watched the trial and listened to all witness testimony including AH. I started out expecting to find in her favour ( I am a vitim of SA/SV and DV) The words she is spinning in this interview do not make sense and are a contradiction to the facts which came out in the trial. If you say it enough times it doesn't make lies truth AH! It is insulting to the public and especially to victims of SA/SV and DV. I do hope you stop! Alyte, I wish that you and Camille V would get together and speak publicly to rubbish these accounts which are toxic. I feel embarrassed for AH having listened to her on the stand through that court process. ANYONE who watched the WHOLE TRIAL ESPECIALLY AH on the stand, could not feel anything but embarrassment and anger for her! It is wrong that she is allowed to continue. Thank you so much for all your time and skillful deliberations during the whole case and since. Bless you Alyte. Good to tune in again. x
I studied narcissism for two years. There are different types and with each comes (some) differences in behavior. To me and many others watching the trial who have endured narcissistic abuse Amber's behavior from the beginning even before hearing Dr. Curry's diagnosis, of BPD and "Histrionic" BD (aka narcissism) we saw her malignant narcissism and recognized the narcissistic abuse that Johnny endured. It was very triggering, especially for survivors with C-PTSD stemming from the abuse. Amber's behavior is textbook which means if you look at a list of "Grandious Narcissistic" behavior then you will have 90% of your questions answered when asking why Amber reacts the way she does and responds to questions the way she does. She is so obvious she is constantly making a fool out of herself. She is an easy target for Social Media content. She is so predictable that Camille was able to easily bait her into anger with certain questions on the stand in order to make the real Amber shine through, showing who she really is. Amber will never be well or change, narcissists can't change and that's tragic because she was likely raised by an abusive narcissistic parent. Johnny must stay away from her giving her zero contact not taking the bait she's been dishing out since the trial ended. She would love a fight and cause even more chaos in his life so she can control the narrative and gain power over his reputation again by gaslighting the public and creating doubt. Keeping herself relevant and in the news. She has to have all the attention. She wanted him to give an interview after she did because that would give her material to tear apart in the media as I described. She wants to get him back in court so that she may get another chance to win. I wouldn't doubt if she's cheering on this Rocky guy promoting him in this recent lawsuit against JD. If Rocky wins then she will use similar accusations within it to defame Depp's reputation once more, giving validation to her lies. Anytime JD is in the news it will light a match, anytime she hears about an accomplishment it will cause her narcissistic ego to react because she just can't stand to see him happy or have his own power and freedom. Always remember that accusations from a narcissist are most always confessions. She talks about being angry about "men having all the power" men like Johnny. When in fact the real reason she is angry is that, she wants to have all the power, especially power over Johnny. He rejected her so now all she has is her minion Eve who soon she will burn as well and look for new supply.
If she doesn't consider paid witnesses, or experts, or friends or family valid, yet also doesn't consider NON paid everyday "Randos" valid, then who EXACTLY WOULD she consider valid and believelable? She literally excluded all people. So, essentially there is no one that could, or should be believed on JD's side. Also on the stand she said the headline wasn't about Johnny, it was about something that happened to her after Johnny. Why aren't we talking about that? Why isn't she attacking that person who assaulted her.. Since the headline isn't about Johnny's "SA" Does Amber seem like a woman who would just let that go? No, because another person doesn't exist. She is still attacking Johnny. It's so sad and disturbing.
Your first point is exactly the same comment I was going to make. She discounted “paid employees”, “randos”, and that leaves only JD to testify on his own behalf which Of course she would claim was lying. She basically then believes she should have gotten a “gimme” verdict which aligns perfectly with the Me2 position.
She could have waltzed into that courtroom and won if she had just made exactly that point and stayed away from rehashing all the allegations against him. If only she had followed her lawyers' advice, but she couldn't help herself. It was always about destroying his life.
@@SacredForest347 Agree. I think she could have won of she didn't won if she didn't try to claim he BRUTALLY abused her the way she did. Her evidence totally contrary to her account of ALL incidence, including Johnny's.
They aren't really "randos" either. They're people who had valid reasons to be there and were their knowledge backed up by evidence (that they did those jobs). A true rando would be some person who claimed to have walked by and seen an altercations, that person would have not true evidence they were there at the right moment. Jonnhy's "randos" were essentially known witnesses that chose to step forward. Had they come to her defence she would have called them very important unbiased witnesses no doubt.
Exactly! She just makes me sick! Every time I hear her voice now “I just Cringe” and when I see her I actually feel sick to my stomach! She is so vile and evil it’s scary! If she could do that to her husband, someone who she supposedly loves, then the rest of the world better look out!
I really hope Johnny's lawyers get an injunction to stop Scamber. Otherwise she will never stop. We all want to get on with our lives after the case. Imagine being Johnny and having your abuser given a platform to continue her abuse after all these years. She's disgusting.
When she started the accusations media were in her side, defending her and destroying JD, he lose jobs, he stayed quiet. At UK audios released and people start changing their minds. Not because we don’t believe her but we started to looking closely and it’s undeniable who is the abuser in that relationship
Congrats Alyte! I saw pics of your wedding celebration on twitter! It was so sweet of you to invite #Iambobbylondon, and I'm so glad that he was able to make it! Also, wow, leave it up to lawyers to buy plane tickets from all over the world to celebrate with you!
Perhaps News Corp who own the The Sun that defamed Depp with the 'wife-beater' article and also own Talk Radio where the article writer Dan Wootton worked at. Which also employed Robert Palmer, son of Judge Nicol who decided the verdict against Depp in the UK trial. News Corp could certainly afford to fund Amber and they also own the New York Post which was posting pro-Amber articles throughout the trial often cherry picking and twisting facts to fit their false narrative.
More then that, she needs to being stripped of her property till she paid her bills. She’s already lost her credibility so lower as that will not happen but making sure she never hurts other people, that can we all do. Boycott every movie she played or will play in. Boycott the industry that hires her again.
According to Dr.Curry AH will always have to have the last word, again & again All the cuts in the final product aired Friday shows Amber must have had final editing rights....imo
I see the edits as a sign that she was so far off her rocker that this was the best NBC could do given what they had to cut to avoid legal repercussions for giving her a platform to defame him further.
This is so wild to me because I can't even exaggerate a funny story for bigger laughs out of fear that I would be exposed as a liar. It just...never occurs to me that other people don't get that same nauseated feeling when being dishonest
I just have to say, I love your honesty in this. You are the kind of lawyer I wanted to be when I was younger. Never made it because I became a single mom, but I think your awesome!!
For people who haven’t been through domestic violence and violent essay feel that they can’t really say they could agree or disagree with Amber saying that she’s still loves Johnny But I have been through both of those for A year and a half and that was 28 years ago. To this day I hate my ex and what he did to me and our son. And there’s no way I would ever say I love him. That is not reality and everyone who’s been in DV and essay absolutely would not still be in love with their abuser! That’s just bullshit!!!
Thanks, I've seen this interview ad nauseam from many lawtube and psychology channels but wanted to check yours as well! I absolutely crack up when you get to a point 'what.. what...' :-D
Amber: “Don’t believe what you see and hear. Believe what I say only” What a manipulator. And someone who likes to be in control. These people are only effective on people who can’t think for themselves
Itś disappointing to see that based on this interview she didn´t learn anything from the case. Would think that having all that dirty laundry out there like that for 6 weeks to face would make a person go "Whoa, I really need to have look at myself, this is not good!" But she seems to have an opposite reaction, she is doubling down. 😞
My comment is months after you made this video and the interview aired… This is an excellent video. You nailed it when saying AH had an expectation to be the MeToo warrior and public opinion to side with her during the Trial. She was listening to the woke narrative of Legacy Media.
My experience with this trial: 1) prior to it, I wasn't a Depp fan, and I thought AH had some reasonable claims; 2) during trial, she started to smell rotten; 3) After trial, I'm a JD fan, and AH disgusts me. I've come to the healthy conclusion that she doesn't suffer from borderline personality disorder, she suffers from over-the-line personality disorder.
NBC proved why we don't trust MSM, the cutting of things they aired in teasers earlier in the week that make what was said look in a better light. In theory both sides are treated the same in court. It appears to me that occured in this trial the same amount of time allowed by both and neither side was allowed to bring everything they wanted in. If AH's team had stopped focusing so much on JD's drug use they would have had more time to work with.
I love how when delivering her performance on the stand she says: (In an angry tone) 'Johnny, you hit me ' Quickly followed by a dramatic and oh soo sad 'you hit me' I can't believe she was a paid actress.
Doctors and therapists are MANDATED reporters. If she disclosed the abuse and because Depp had children underage the therapist would have had to report the abuse to proper channels
In another video on UA-cam they explained the situation around the courthouse. Within a minute the car is on the main road. So 4 to 6 blocks of people with signs ??? They used Google maps and streetview :-)
American judicial system for lawsuits is HORRIBLE . The jury based the entire 15 million dollar payout on “she made be feel awkward when she kept looking at us” I mean shouldn’t it be beyond a reasonable doubt when 15 million dollars is on the line ? How do we know Johnny didn’t bottle Amber . None of us were there in the hotel room that night
1:00:05 VICTIM!! She said during her testimony that she NEVER had said that she was a VICTIM and that Camille absolutely could NOT call her a VICTIM but still, here she is stating it clear as day - I AM A VICTIM!! How is it gonna be Amber?? You can’t have it both ways!! You can’t ALWAYS BE RIGHT!!! This interview really makes me boil inside!!! She is despicable and she can’t remember her own lies, she contradict herself all of the time!!
There is now a campaign targeted at UA-cam channels that encourage discussion about the Depp/Heard trial. It was really obvious when a psychology channel is targeted. One doctor consistently urged the viewers to be fair and see both sides, but most time had obvious compassion for Heard which we understood as he treats people with BPD and other similar disorders. The psychologist was more willing to concede that Heard exhibited traits of BPD once he got through Heard’s testimony, however stated AH could still have been abused by Depp to the irritation of some of his followers. Suddenly, there are commenters on the videos speaking about DARVO and “stonewalling”, mass manipulation of the public etc. Also blatant attempts to twist the interpretation of the audio snippets, even contradicting Heard’s own explanations on the stand. Instead of denying Heard may have abused Depp, him seeking to leave a physical fight is now abuse on Heard (twisted interpretation of “stonewalling”in relationships) The comments have nothing to do with psychology and introduced an atmosphere I’ve only ever seen on Twitter. If this is all a PR campaign, this is disturbing. People watched the trial and came to their conclusions, so did the jury. So why do I feel as if my mind is being bombarded daily to make me feel I am stupid and need someone else to help me form my opinions? How is this image rehabilitation for AH? Couldn’t a softer approach to invoke empathy about psychological disorders or discussions about consequences of toxic relationship on the mental state further their cause in a better way?
Narcissists want two things. 1. Attention. Any attention. Positive or negative. Doesn’t matter. 2. Revenge. Narcissistic injury leads to rage and an all out war on the person who rejected them. And the rage is so strong that they can’t see how their actions are hurting them the most. They are hyper focused on destroying the other person at any cost.
I felt Amber was abused. I was born into an abusive family. My father was the abuser and my mom stayed with him for many, many years. I lived the abuse, saw the abuse and that’s why I believe Amber. There are times when the abused will stand up to the abuser. That doesn’t mean they have complete control. My mom hid the abuse and I hate how people question why Amber didn’t report it, that’s part of the abusive relationship…invoking enough fear and having enough manipulation to scare the other from saying or doing anything. She may be a liar and may have done things others don’t understand, but I wholeheartedly believe she was honest about being abused.
@@deliahfigueroa9799 I'm sorry for what you and your mom went through. Did you watch the trial though or at least all her testimony? I started from AH testimony onward and then went back to the beginning. I was totally freaked by the abuse she described, but something about the way she described things was just weird. By the time the cross-examination was over, I doubted most of her testimony but I still wanted to believe her. I dug up everything I could find on the case and that was it. No one can be sure she wasn't abused at all, but Depp didn't do all those horrible things she described. You cannot heal that kind of damage in a day, not even one week. It can't be hidden with makeup. A person has to go to a doctor and/or hide away for a long time, theres no bouncing back the next day. The audio submitted into evidence was even more disturbing. You can go to the court web page and listen to the full audios from both sides. Her voice and her words triggered me, sent me back in time to a relationship when I was much younger. I could not identify with AH, but I can identify with JD even though he is a man. I've been in similar arguments, taken crap from someone who claimed to love, made to believe they acted they way they did because of me. They always wanted to fight. It was always my fault. AH portrayed herself almost like an angel, refused to admit to ever abusing her ex even though her own recordings showed that she did. She was unreal. Not reporting abuse should never be the issue. I believe she lost because she lied repeatedly. Her pictures of slight bruising or redness didn't match up to the extreme damage she described. If she was punched over and over in the face, how can she look picture perfect the next day? She may actually have a behavioral disorder but it doesn't excuse her actions. A lawyer can explain better why she lost the case, but Dr. Courtney Tracy and some of the other psychologists on UA-cam helped me empathize with AH at least a little.
Alyte I've watched the whole trial, this whole interview, & everybody's rebuttal to it. It can be so incredibly frustrating. Your calmness & knowledge makes me feel sooo much better!!!! Excellent!
I feel your exasperation Aleta. You're expecting someone who has no morality who is used to manipulating people by lying and getting away with it. This interview is her putting out to the public who didn't watch the trial her version of the truth without all that pesky evidence. Many have said the therapist notes are in Amber's writing. Also a therapist can't testify whether what Amber told her is true. Rob Lumber Law clarified this topic really well.
I've worked in the medical field and the therapist would have had those notes typed up and put them in a file not a binder. They would have also written a care plan.
And a therapist in California is considered a mandatory reporter. If the notes were believable it would have been the therapist's duty to report the danger to the client.
@@SacredForest347 not true. Mandatory reporting is for children, disabled and dearly. Only medical Dr's need to report. Therapists are totally different
As someone who took the stand at 16 against my own father for SA, I can say with certainty that as terrifying and grueling as that was, it was NOT more terrifying than the actual ordeal. Can't speak for everyone, of course. Every person is different, but her behavior has never aligned with her narrative to me. I couldn't eat or sleep during the trial. I was weak and pale for days, even after it was over. I was heartbroken, and still am sixteen years later. It's a different kind of grief, and I don't see that in AH.
I wish I found your channel sooner. You make her interview sound like a joke on AH`s part, and I love that, and also when you commented to her statements "lies, lies, lies,lies, lies ,lies.."🤣!!!!!!! One thing I have to address, JD has lived with this person for many tears, and his name ruined for 6 years, its actually almost 10 years with being bullied+++++
Je t’adore, Alyte! Beaucoup Beaucoup Beaucoup!!! I straight up had a authentic and potent case of the giggles for a solid 5-7mins when you said “she’s trying to make fetch happen!” Chef’s kiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiissssss for that one. You’re 1 of ~3 (of over easily 100 channels) that I subscribe to where I turn on allll alerts for. I have also taken up doing a happy wiggle in my chair while mouthing “Yay! Yay! Yay!” when I see new uploads from you show up 🙃 Can’t wait for the next one - I hope to join a live stream sometime too! But, for now, I shall thank you again for this A1 Content and wish you the most lovely morning, afternoon, evening, or night (Actually, I choose alllllll the above too)!!! 🫶 from Canada 🇨🇦 🍁, Virginia Ann (a new and cheerful fan!)
In my experience, in dealing with the justice system, was being told I'm a liar, and having to talk about what happened to many strangers was very traumatic. But I could never consider that to be a worse experience than the actual ass*ult. He plead guilty the day before trial to receive lesser charges. That sucked. Arguably the worst part of my experience with the justice system was during a recent hearing (since he broke multiple terms of probation) where he threw a pity party for himself because it is difficult to find work or a place to live as a registered s*x offender. Still doesn't even touch the trauma of the actual ass*ult.
I can’t wait to see if you talk about her filing to have the case thrown out so to speak because of the juror who spoke out against her and how they lied about who they were
One thought I had is that it would seem to me a ton of Johnny fans outside the courthouse would give the jury the impression his career was not so harmed. So would this not potentially harm his case more than hers?
There was a video of her getting out of a car to do a speech about DV and there happened to be a deaf person there and coincidentally she was able to speak ASL to him. They signed for a few minutes while everyone stared and then they hugged and people were awed. It looked like a PR stunt to me so people can like her even more. It was uncomfortable cause she does these things that make you believe she's a wonderful caring person, but we see how she is behind closed doors.
Also adding that in the weeks of JD's testimony, the panel for this channel were concerned it made HIM look bad. As soon as she started giving her testimony, that opinion shifted. Then followed by weak "evidence" from her side. It wasn't Johnny's 3 and a half weeks of testimony that turned everyone against her and supposedly brainwashed the jury... It was her own BS that she spewed. I really hope she gets the help she needs and sees that one day. And I pray she doesn't poison her daughter's mind with these lies
She looks completely different than days before. She looked older in court, she even looks thinner now. Oh look, it's Grace Kelly in "Country Girl". She wore a costume every day. American Airlines pilot, Darth Vader meets Princess Leia, Girl Johnny Depp...
The bailiff wouldn’t allow you to even wear a T-shirt about Johnny Depp or Amber they made you turn the T-shirt inside out or leave the court room. Therefore looking at the galley The jury could not possibly know Who was for Depp or Heard. As to people lined up to go into court. There were in the line Depp AND Heard supporters. So if the jurors saw the long line outside the court room they Likely would have assumed The line had both supporters in the same line. It’s only Amber trying to convince the public that there were indicators of only Depp supporters because she knows people were not in line and they were not in the court room. Thank goodness it was on live TV so that at least you tubers can prove she lied though it would be nice if Court TV showed it as well to prove to the world that she’s lying again!
On the first day I actually thought all the women in the courtroom and seated on her side were there for her! It wasn’t until Johnny turned around at the end of the day to wave at them that I realized they were all there for him!
Lies, lies and more lies. If I could cast her in one role, it is Cersei from GoT. What she says us not republication, because she is now directly calling JD an abuser herself, not indirectly and denying authorship.
Now if she said it started in 2011, it seems to me that she planned to accuse him (now this is the third date change of when the abuse happened?) from when she met him. Calculating.
Just because AH can’t imagine going any amount of time not on social media, or not watching the news, doesn’t mean everyone is like that. Believe it or not, there are people who don’t watch the news, or even cable tv, but rather streaming services. There are people who don’t use Twitter 24/7, aren’t on Tik Tok, and aren’t on Instagram, or even UA-cam. The only reason I was even aware of the case is because I watch UA-cam. I don’t use other social media bc it is terrible for my mental health. I avoid the news for the same reason. Shocking, I know. I can’t imagine how much that concept would totally blow her mind.
Amber has unlimited publicity as long as she continues to make a fool of herself. I think this is fine for someone suffering from NPD. They don't care what people think because they don't know what people think because they have no empathy. She's fine being the villain as long as she gets plenty of attention. I really hope the Virginia courts have the strength to punish her for her perjury and constant defamation, she's used to getting a pass in life because she was previously attractive, but Judge Azcarate or someone has to stand up to her.
i'm glad you mentioned the tone and the context as for what someone would look for in a statement. It's key to understanding why most of the evidence is in favour of Depp. His behaviour is consistence with his recordings.
I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that those that could be deceived by what she is saying in this interview, are those who did not WATCH her full testimony and cross and all of the trial! She is expert at deception but watching the full trial it is easy to see her ridiculous acting as a 'survivor' completely cringe and UNcredible! It angers me too Alyte!!
The funny thing is, and what is made clear by the juxtaposition between this interview and her testimony, is that she is absolutely not a master of deception. NBC had to do all kinds of editing with the cut of the interview, the emotional music, the voiceovers, the cinematography, and selective questions in order to make any of what she said in the interview at all believable or sympathetic. When left on her own to attempt deceiving without help, she flounders and fails and it’s so obvious, and that’s what was shown by her in her testimony.
But I think that's exactly the audience AH is aiming for. There are people who didn't watch the trial, but want to know a bit of what happened (maybe because it's a hot topic but they don't have the time). If these people only receive information from mainstream media like this interview, they would look things from AH's twisted angle. That worries me more then angering me.
@@chiao-juhung796 yes, I agree, those people need to hear what legitimate and credible 'lawtubers' put out there. Shame on those media outlets that are peddling the AH twisted narrative!
@@Emnms68 yes, you're absolutely right. I would have been more correct to say 'her attempts at deception are an embarrassment.' If she was good at it, those watching her testimony would not be struggling so much with the ridiculous display she put on.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I went into the trial just thinking it was all him… I live in the U.K. and although I did nt follow the case here, I thought she was abused. But OMG having watched her on the stand as a witness, she seems very toxic and abusive. The more I listen to her, the more I am glad it was televised and we can now all see the actual Amber
I’m just realizing they also cut out the part where she said she was pushed to the point that she didn’t know the difference between right and wrong 😲
😮😮
They sure did
They cut all the incriminating stuff!!
@Rachel - are y’all saying that the originally aired version of the interview has since been edited down? I had no idea! If that is what you’re saying, is it because they’re backpedalling to see face for Amber? If you could spare a minute to educate lil’ol me, I’d be oh-so happy and grateful!
@@virginiaanndavidson178 The teaser bits that were played during the week leading up to the full interview had elements that were cut out in Friday's edit!
If those "burn the witch" signs really did exist, the mainstream media would have blown that up and made that a headline for days.
Exactly! The truth according to AH is never realistic! Everything is histrionic and overblown. It's so sad for her.
Typical untreated BPD manipulation of the narrative to distract, deflect and gain the upper hand in the exchange.
Her fans had the same opportunity to come out in support of her. There were very few, and i wonder if the trial changed their minds. If they are DV survivors, they likely did.
An argument has been made that AH was exaggerating for effect, and / or making an allusion to a scene from a Monty Python comedy. If one further assumes that Dr. Curry's diagnoses are correct, then familiarization with these disorders would make it quite understandable that such intent would not be recognized or understood.
That's exactly what I've been saying for months! The MSM would've been all over the people holding those fictitious signs and further, her security would NEVER have allowed her to accept flowers from a fan of they weren't flowers she sent to herself! 'Course she also lined up paid "fans" to scream when she came to her vehicle so we all know there nothing this woman won't do to avoid looking as pitiful as she did!!
I feel like Samantha Guthrie didn't put her foot down as the interviewer & just let AH have her way. She did that in court to us or no answers, so why not in an interview she was likely paid to give. I'd have thought NBC didn't get their money worth but that beeps I learned they were going to be AH shills! In interested to see what changes now that Camille Vasquez is on board at NBC. I did boycott NBC Tim they hired her so I'll def be watching. She doesn't pull punches & let anyone walk all over her. That's going to be fun to watch!!
Wait a minute! She says she’s not a perfect victim? The only time she showed any true emotion in the trial was when Camille called her a victim and she aggressively exclaimed that she was NOT a victim!! Everything is a contradiction and/or an inconsistency. I can’t
That moment really stuck in my brain
What is a perfect victim anyway? A victim is a victim! That statement made me so angry! She is a vile human being!
I find myself pointing to Rob (Law and Lumber) with this stupid talking point. It's toxic and will do very real damage to real victims.
@@sporkfoon Yes, I was so moved by Rob from Law and Lumber's passionate encouragement that victims NOT allow Heard and MSM's BS talking point about this to dissuade anyone from coming forward and asking for help. Yes, disbelief of victims is a serious and pervasive problem that we need to address in our culture. But per Rob--who actually works on these cases on behalf of victims--that does NOT mean you need to be "perfect" to be believed, and does NOT mean you need "mountains of evidence." The truth has power, as we saw in this case.
@@oldenglish. I suspect from all her behaviors put together that she identified with her abuser growing up, as some victims do. In addition, she said her father explicitly taught her to be tough and not show emotion when he had her help him break horses.
Them editing the teaser clips into the “full” video are why we needed cameras in the court room. It’s clear the main stream media is pushing Amber’s narrative no matter what the jury decided
So true. I was praising Savannah's interview from the clips, but once the full version was released I was so disappointed. They just let her spew her lies.
Savannah didn't seem like she believed Amber though. So that's that 🤷🏾♀️
💯 agree!!
@@hez01 I know this is so disappointing that they cut out and edit badly, but remember Savanna has bosses and we don’t really know how much she pushed and asked, because they are edit it out
SHE took JDs voice for 6 years. SHE wasn't telling people calling JD a wife beater to stop its unfair but is now saying when she found guilty in court. Its all about HER. She NEVER called herself a victim she testified under oath yet says she's a victim 3x in her interview.
🙌🙌 Exaaaactly! Well said! I don't have any sympathy for her! Even if she loses her entire career, all her money, all of her supporters (last time I checked, there are not many left, but still)... She did it to herself! She is vile, selfish, narcissistic, cruel and finally she is facing the consequences of her idiotic actions!
@@kbn7160 Let's be honest, she has got a problem, maybe more than 1, but my sympathy is gone.
TBH like Alyte says, all you need is to listen to the audio to realise the nature of the abuse in their relationship. And it is not just what they say, but how they say it. JD is sticking up for himself, but she is controlling the conversation, sometimes leading it in unexpected directions and preventing JD from leaving it. It makes me feel more sorry for Whitney who has had this her entire life. No wonder JD still cares deeply for her IMO.
Ah needs to go away for a very long time 😜
@@sandracoulon9231 , like .... Forever ... 😂
@@psychologicalprojectionist Ya, just because people have personal problems, doesnt mean we have to have sympathy for them, she reached a point of No Return in my eyes, I just watch the circus unfold now.
Savannah Guthrie's unwavering poker face throughout this interview is amazing. 😐
I’m not sure anyone has pointed this out, but when discussing the Jury, AH is solely focused on “Social Media”, because it was against her.
AH never mentions the Mainstream Media, which the Jury could have also saw, that was very much Pro-AH, heck, they could’ve saw something talking about the UK trial verdict.
AH isn’t worried about that because it could’ve influenced the Jury in a way that she wanted.
AH likes to talk about “Fairness”, but like all narcissists, “what’s fair to AH” is all that matters.
Such a good point you raise here.
Amber loves to throw the fair word around, it's there on the tapes too and as you say means for her to get what she wants while pretending she's compromising.
True, although much of social media was on her side for most of the time before the trial
Great points!! You're so right!!! What about all the "pro-her" media attention???
Wow! Great point. I can see though how generally people would spend more time seeing social media coverage vs. traditional media. But, as someone who followed the case due to it popping up in my feed, I definitely saw both social media creators AND mainstream media videos. So it is very interesting that AH didn't mention the jury's possible exposure to mainstream media.
She's focused so much on it because of her ego. Nevermind that it was her lawyers who brought in the social media angle and amber Terd hashtags, she even told the jury to look her up online to see. So delusional 🤦♀️
As a daughter of a narcissist mother, I'm confident that AH will want to tell her daughter as early as possible for the pitty party. Her daughter will be her ultimate source of narcissistic fuel. Poor baby girl.
It’s a vicious circle.
Heaven help that kid if she turns out to be prettier than mommy…
I’m concerned for her health as well… Heard punched Johnny hard enough to bruise and even MUTILATED him. That little girl is in serious danger. Doubly so since she’s so young and fragile
@@dinkalicious The child doesn't even need to be prettier, she just needs to be pretty and young. It all just hinges on whether Ambers thinks her own beauty has diminished enough by old age according to her own insecurities, and what about her daughter she values. But hopefully she doesn't show that kind of narcissistic bullying while her child is under her protection.
"I did start a physical fight" and then claims that when you're in an abusive dynamic, that you take the blame for things you shouldn't. Can we play the part just after that where she interrupts him, talks over him and starts yelling "you're a BABY! YOU ARE SUCH A BABY, JOHNNY!"
Abuse victims don't taunt their perpetrators like that. Complete liar.
After watching her testimony and interviews, it’s pretty clear to me that she isn’t a particularly bright person and doesn’t have a realistic theory of mind for other people. I don’t think she’s stupid per se, but I think she doesn’t understand that others can see through her contradictory statements and assertions. Listening to the audio of her taunting, berating, and abusing Depp, and her mealy mouthed insistence that she was “negotiating” with a man she was “scared” of, is nothing short of breathtaking. In all of the audio produced, there simply wasn’t any fear in her voice. She wasn’t afraid of Johnny. Fear doesn’t follow “monsters” room to room to chide and insult them. Bullies do that.
And I’m sorry, but I don’t believe that Ms Heard has ever taken a punch to the face by a man. Ever. I also don’t believe she knows the dangers of broken glass. If she had, she would know that getting your shit rocked by a *single* blow to the jaw, cheek, eye, or nose leaves a serious impression on you, and tends to leave a serious mark that makeup isn’t going to easily cover up. Black eyes take a while to go down too. I’ve had my share of black eyes and have had my nose broken for me twice. And no one was wearing heavy rings when I was busy using my nose to stop their fists! She conjures up a bad movie with her nonsense, where the heroine is pummeled by a flurry of strikes before being dragged across broken glass, yet emerging without a scratch on her. Physics and biology simply doesn’t work like she thinks. And it’s insulting to all of us that she thought that she would be taken seriously.
I’m grateful the jury saw through her blather and hope Mr. Depp is on his way to healing.
Exactly! She doesn’t even realize that she sounds like an Abuser more than anything in these Tapes!
If by “love him” she means creepily obsessed with him than yes.
As someone who fought for 17 years in court against my abuser it was crippling to be there to try and get all the information out. Panic attacks at even the sound of his voice. Trying to not be around them at all. Literally having many times when I was ushered into a safe room where I was enclosed myself and my lawyers would have to come tell me what was going on because I physically couldn’t be in the same room… when she said I’m not a victim was chilling to me because it really showed a true abusers personality!
I am sure I’m not the only one who had flashbacks to their own abuse caused by what amber said or did on stand and in audio
I think those who have been abused, can easily spot the abuse in this situation. Others who haven't experienced abuse, still form opinions, but it's not spotted immediately. It's been helpful to read comments about people who have overcome an abusive situation and can point out the red flags that would otherwise be overlooked.
God bless those who are in abusive relationships, and/or have overcome the situation.
It's really easy to just be silent, and it's easy to see why someone might stay in the situation rather than stand up for themselves.
I know what it's like to be afraid of someone you love. When I heard those recordings where she's taunting him I can't believe she was afraid in anyway of that man. Begging to stay in those hostile moments and fight it out certainly did not tract with my experience at all. I really hope you've found the peace and happiness you deserve 💙
@@shannonEGBOK hoping I have she’s over 18 now so I’m hoping it’s never going to happen again. I hope you have found the same peace you wished me as well 🥰
Same. Not as long (still ongoing), but same reactions. Just THINKING about needing to leave the house in the next 3, 4, 8, hours was enough to drive up my pulse & breathing rate until I actually got home. Exhausting is what that is. She seemed to do just fine doing all those speeches & getting all those awards & acting in movies just fine.
@@skrcmama I totally agree as a survivor
People who haven't followed this case think she is so brave for having testified. Those of us who know the truth cannot believe she keeps telling the same lies!! We're confused, disappointed, and infuriated!
"as I testified on the stand "...🤥🤥🤥, Yes Amber, but none of that counted.
@@annikajohansson9171 Exactly!! Doubling and tripling down doesn't make it so!!
She thought she would win because she’s never been held accountable. She is finally getting just a taste of what Johnny has been dealing with for the past 6 years!!!
The irony is that she will never pay JD a cent & got a TON of publicity from this trial. (Any press is good press.) She basically got away with all of this scott free.
NBC should be embarrassed for cutting this interview to try to soften AH and hoping people that didn't watch the court case will believe her innocence. Especially since Savannah is a lawyer and didn't explain to the audience the freedom of speech is not slandering and harming another person. I hope the audience used common sense and can see through AH smoke screen.
Yes that was just so wrong. They're enabling the lies!
Pretty sure NBC had to cut up this interview to protect themselves, not Amber.
Freedom of speech should be to say whatever U want .
@@Emolga6274 ... as long it's not demonstratively false. That's the key issue of defamation.
@Commando, can I write a story about you saying you killed your family and drank their blood if it's not true?
This could literally be used as a tool to illustrate what gaslighting looks like. She warps reality until you are left scratching your head. The audio recordings between she and Johnny are replete with her tying complex knots out of the reality of the situation, while he- sounding increasingly exhausted- attempts to have a rational conversation with her. It’s no wonder he immersed himself in substances, he was likely white-knuckling lucidity after their very first conflict.
That’s exactly why, contrary to Amber’s claims, I feel so vindicated by this trial. She is so much like my abuser and I still don’t know if either them believe their own BS. I just know that feeling of begging to leave to get some space to calm down only to be treated like that’s a bad thing, those desperate attempts to keep my head on straight while the other person is escalating themselves by deciding everything you do is against them… I know what it’s like to finally break down and lose myself completely and I hate that Johnny and anyone else that’s experienced it is.
And when people say they abused each other it bothers me for the same reason- no one can go through having a partner this abusive with out breakdowns. It’s not abuse at that point, it’s from the abuse. Like live with someone who will decide your breathing is a sigh and that sighing is enough to scream at you for literal hours for YEARS and tell me you never snapped- it’s impossible to meet that standard.
@@sourgreendolly7685 you just triggered a memory for me! The sigh accusations! "I didn't sigh, I was just breathing!" Back and forth until you start questioning if you really did sigh! Maybe I did, I no longer know! A huge argument...over BREATHING!
So immensely disappointed in Dateline and how much they edited. They released clips and then edited the full version removing more damaging information that she said.
Hard to trust anything that comes from them now.
I suspect AH's team had some editorial control over the finished product on dateline and wonder if NBC used the today show clips to get around that.
@@SiblingCreature That was my take also.
Your topnotch analysis is exceptional and unbiased. Thank you for your awesomeness
Social media supported her initially. I supported her initially. As the facts came out and it showed she was lying it made me furious because Im a survivor of domestic abuse and I hate when people lie about it because it make it so hard for true survivors to come out and tell their story.
Alyte, your insightful, knowledgeable and compassionate perspective is WONDERFUL. And your elegant and eloquent use of language is an absolute delight. Thank you for the great value of your observations and the example of your open, honest and loving heart. Your influence is a positive force in our world. We really need the example of your energy. Respect and gratitude!
How can a witness "win" a court case? Didn't she claim that she "prevailed" in the UK case? I believe Elaine said something similar in her interviews as well didn't she? What is with these people? Thanks for setting the record straight Alyte.
AH is desperately trying to get the reports of recording of what she said had happened, rather than the clinician’s diagnostic opinion, into the public arena. My therapist insisted that I have my injuries documented by medical professionals because they are mandated reporters, - she was a therapist but not a Medical Doctor. It forced me to face my reality over time, I needed to remove my children and I from the situation and be safe. It’s amazing just how effective the system is if you allow it to run its course. As someone who faced DV I felt it was my fault and I was alone. By following the advise of my therapist, I not only created an evidentiary trail, it also placed people around me who were trained in breaking into the psyche of the victim, and empowered me to see the truth. 1, I was not alone, 2 I deserved better, 3, there were many who were willing to help, 4, there were people who would keep me safe, 5, there are people who will stand beside me hold me up and ensure I’m heard, 6, the people around me also looked out for my children. Even with all that support, I would never poke the person who was aggressive towards me, as I still fear them. If her therapist believed she was in danger due to DV, would have either reported it by mandate if a MD, or created a medical trail. If she was supportive of AH’s narrative AH would have had her testify.
@@juliehowman3912 Exactly right.
She wasn't even a party in the case and so many people paint the UK case as "hers"!! So much spin going on in MSM!
What's with them? They're pathological gaslighters attempting to control the narrative around all of this.
@@SacredForest347 you miss my point. There is no way on earth, I would testify or write an opinion piece against my abuser. Yes I speak out against family violence, but in no way shape or form do I give any information as to why. I have the support around me to know that he can never hurt me or my kids again but I’m not chancing it. It would be a kick in the face for all those who patiently and diligently worked to teach me I was not to blame, that there were many who would stand with and around me, I just had to take a leap of faith. Why would you once free from your oppressor, goad them to anger without reason. I was terrified when he threatened to take my kids from me, and yes I did risk his ire, as I had been assured by the social workers, the legal team and all those entrusted to keep me safe that he would not win, there was too much violence. You know what they were right, he soon gave up the fight, when he realised that he had to get to me through a lawyer, he quit because he was just a bully, but I still would not goad him without cause.
It cracks me up when she’s say she was “lending” her voice to a bigger cultural conversation… I never asked to borrow her voice. I didn’t even know who the heck she was! Lol ugh 😩
Absolutely
On Spidey’s recent review of this interview, Christine Pykles pointed out that in UK trial, Heard as a witness pushed for and was granted special permission to sit in the court every day, hearing what evidence was given, before she had to speak. I haven’t read the transcript yet to verify this.
I thought Christine said she was denied that? AH originally didn't want to testify, but then when she finally agreed she pushed for that special permission...
@@SilverAlaunt she and Whitney were allowed in, to my knowledge
It is true. I remember that it was not a usual thing. She and Whitney got special permission to be in the court. They had to be told to stop texting each other. They also changed their testimony because of what others said on the stand and evidence given..even then their stories didn't match.
It’s true, I was there!
@@zottelhuehs6375 Got it. I had to go back and relisten to that part of Spidey's stream. The moment where Christina (not Christine) mentioned being granted special permission, she kinda mumbled it so it wasn't very clear. But she also didn't expand further on it, so, in combination with the mumble, I assumed AH wasn't permitted. Thanks!
Alyta, the reason why her response to the instigation question seems vague and confusing is because they cut out significant portions of that response and spliced what was left into a sem-coherent sentence. The teaser clips released in the days leading up to this “full” interview showed very different and potentially embarrassing answers to Savannah’s questions, especially related to this one in particular.
I am shocked that Alyte missed the Frankenstein-splice of AH's "black and white" statement (around 18:00). Granted, it was a masterful cut, and would be nearly impossible to detect if one hadn't seen the uncut versions from the Today Show, but I would have thought Alyte would have seen something about it either on twitter, or from other lawtubers, even if it didn't jump straight out at her here. I was not expecting her to breeze right past it.
@@Coralyn “I’m shocked she missed it but they did do an expert job of covering the cut where it’s almost impossible to tell”
Really?
@@Sageddegas Indeed. #oddlycontradictory
Alyte* :)
Emily D Baker had a recent video outlining the changes and her reaction to them. It’s really good!
The notes were excluded because they are hearsay. The therapist could have testified. Depp did not object. But Bonnie, the therapist, did not testify.
Why? Heard chose not to call her.
Hypothesis: the notes are fake, and Bonnie would have said so.
My hypothesis: They weren't taken "in real time" as she claims. I heard this is what she told to her therapist after 2018. If she did call her, everyone would know that. If she chooses not to call her she can pretend to the public that this corroborates her story better.
Also she wouldn't want her to testify as I bet there will be info in those notes she doesn't want out in public...like notes around BPD maybe 🤔
Dr Hughes referenced the notes repeatedly on the stand so they weren't exactly a secret during the trial. I would like to know how they proved they came from this other therapist.
@@EwokingDeadGirl Correct. The therapist notes and the text messages were commented on in both Curry and Hughes testimony, so it seems they were allowed for review by the experts, just not for the jury.
Exactly. Handwritten notes can be made literally at any time. I wouldn’t be surprised if she spent a day writing in notebooks to make a fake paper trail
To be honest, the thing that infuriates me the most is she claiming that she has no voice anymore. She wants her voice back. They took her voice.
I'm sorry, fucking what?
Imagine being an actual victim, living with an abusive partner. You've been slowly isolated from all of your own friends and family. All the acquaintances you have left are your partners friends, which would 100% take their side were you to tell them about the abuse. And don't even think about going online and telling strangers about the abuse. No, you'll be beaten to death. Or driven to suicide. Either way, you'll pay for that act.
You might not even see it as abuse anymore. You've been slowly suffocated of all your sense of self worth. You think you deserve it. It's your fault. It's not even abuse anymore. It's just... Life.
THAT is not having a voice. And that is a reality for millions of men and women out there.
Now, being able to speak openly and freely about it and being heard by millions, if not billions at this point, without any real danger, except legal, IS having a voice. Amber has an enormous platform. And to think that she, in her twisted world, thinks that she's the same as those truly without a voice is truly disgusting. And even if the abuse was true - even if Johnny 100% abused Amber - She still has a voice. She still has a very dedicated large group of dedicated fans. She still has reach. True victims could only dream of being heard and believed by at least one person.
of cause she still has a voice... and she is making money of it by doing those interviews, or is there anyone believing, she does them for free? AH is just a pathetic human being and a daily waste of oxygen...
Yep. She's the only one flooding us with her lying"voice." Wish she'd silence herself. She's the only one talking, talking...
You speak like one that has experienced abuse at the hands of another with a personality disorder. I'm so sorry you went through whatever it is that has given you such clear insights. Hope you're safe now, and doing ok
What she actually is meaning when she means she "has not voice" is: "Nobody longer believes me"... That is what bothers her.
True. If she didn't have a voice she wouldn't have tweeted post trial and came on this interview (most likely paid to SPEAK) to echo what she claimed happened to her.
LISTENING TO HER SPEAK MAKES ME WANT TO THROW MY PHONE AT THE WALL 😩
“How could they believe me after 3 and a half week of all of this evidence???” Is what she should have said. I can’t do it.
It is so hard to watch the truth be twisted into something so unrecognizable. That is why everyone is so angry about this mess! Myself included!
🤣🤣same
Yes! She’s so cringy! Makes me throw up in my mouth to listen to her. I only saw the teasers not the full (redacted) interview and I couldn’t even stomach the teasers. Her whole presence at the trial was disgusting! And when johnnys lawyer went after her I was like “fist bump… get her!”
I wish JD lawyers brought in a medical expert to prove its physically impossible to hide a broken nose black eyes and split lip with makeup the day after
And to confirm it's impossible to get slap in the face then turn around to face the person who slap you
If anyone has ever had a cast on their arm they know , if they hit someone in the face with it not only once but repeatedly, it WILL cause serious damage to the skin.
Great point !
Actually JD team did have a forensic pathologist expert as a rebuttal witness, but AH team did not call their expert. So JD team could not call their expert for rebuttal. I think they mentioned it via reading the proffers after or before closing arguments?
They didn’t need to, because her explanation was so ridiculous that no one would ever believe that a swollen and purple nose would magically look uninjured with some ice and makeup 😆
I've been re-watching the trial. 💖 Thank you so much for your time spent with this coverage.
Every time she speaks she contradicts something she said before. That kind of behavior leads others to think she's not being honest. It's absolutely fascinating to watch an adult female do this. Plus, she is single highhandedly swinging the ME2Movement back towards reality. AND giving hope to hundred of thousands of men who have been ruined by lies. It's so much fun, and healing, to hear a female lawyer like you with your grounded legal conviction about this. Thank you, thank you thank you!
It's a big part of why people who watch more than 30 minutes of her speaking come to distrust her. Many people who support her just watch clips taken out of context or just read the articles that her PR team are pushing.
@@OceanHedgehog ... 🤔 wondering if most if not all supporters are between the ages of 9 thru 14 ( the ones who believe that Aquaman, Batman & other comic book characters are ALIVE & REAL living in a body of water or town near them 😳! (OR OTHERS that have been & will continue to PROFIT 💰 off the enormous amount of 💰 thrown at these "nonprofit" orgs🤔) My goodness this broad appears to be a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR in SERIOUS NEED of MENTAL HELP! Somebody please 🆘 AH so her CHILD HAS A CHANCE AT A SAFE & HEALTHY LIFE!
AH’s next sentence after “yes, I did start a physical fight” came after her saying “I wasn’t punching you, I was hitting you” and right before she says “you are such a baby, you’re a baby Johnny, grow up”.
I wish Savannah would have read that whole passage to her.
Of AH would have just said there’s some mysterious context we’re missing.
She’s a liar & a gaslighter.
There is no context that could make that look good.
It’s an interview, not a cross examination. Savannah had to make sure AH didn’t shut it down.
Thank you for commenting on and analyzing the interview. Thank you for teaching us about the law and how Amber is misunderstanding the law.
They have edited out all of her smirks as well as the,"victims don't have the ability that you and I have".
I found you as a result of a compilation of lawtube. I’m glad that I did. Your commentary is great. Thank you.
Well done! I particularly appreciate that you encouraged DV survivors to reach out for help and offered resources to do so. AH has done more to undermine MeToo movement and being a voice for people who have been abused/assaulted sexually or who have been victims of domestic abuse. Shame of her! Thank you for your resounding voice to truth and foe your insights and perspective. Love your channel.
Omg! “She’s trying to make fetch happen”. That was a great mean girls reference. I started watching the trial about week 3, and didn’t catch up to the missing two weeks until after the trial was over. I gotta say, as a DV and SA survivor I did not believe more than 1/16 of what she said.
If she really lost her voice she wouldn’t have been able to do the interview. You don’t know or understand what it really means to not have a voice AH. Not to mention that defamation had to be found WITH MALICE, and that was what was found. As for his exes, they came and gave sworn testimonies that he was never abusive. AH AND JD had the same private entrance and the only thing there was a gate. No media or “fans” were allowed beyond the gates or to block the gates. MSM would have made a big deal if there were horrible signs and shouts being made against AH and they didn’t say anything through out the trial. Also there are all kinds of witnesses that were there and can tell you that you were wrong. Not everyone in the gallery were fans. You even had fans of your own at one point. There were lawyers who were simply interested in the trial as that is there job, trials, and to see the lawyers. No one was allowed to talk in the gallery nor could they wear costumes or shirts that indicated who’s side they were on. Those who watched the trial could see this. The public saw her lying and not admitting to any faults throughout the whole trial.
The UK trail was different in so many ways: a) AH wasn’t a party but a witness meaning she didn’t win anything as it wasn’t her case. b) because she was only a witness here level of evidence wasn’t as high. c) the legality is different as it is a different country. d) most of his evidence was denied.
There was no negotiation; that was AH verbally assaulting him and admitting to her doing the physical abuse. She brought in lots of the audio herself and the clips were all longer than 30 seconds. Her lawyers even had the option to bring in longer clips yet they chose not too. She didn’t argue on the stand for anything but DV and SA, so don’t try to twist it or add more now. AH had no evidence to back up her story, and each story got more elaborate each time she told it as well as adding more events. Most, if not all, of her so called abuse would have demanded medical attention as well as days of not weeks of healing. AH had so many other inconsistencies in her stories and so called evidence.
Stop with your twisting of the story about the donation you never made AH. A donation is not the same as a mortgage by any stretch of the imagination. Donation means give them the money then and there, especially when you said “I donated the money”. A mortgage is having a bank pay for the house in full and then you pay the bank back in the form of a loan and if you don’t pay it back you can get into trouble such as loosing the house. No one told her to make the donation. No one told her to announce it publicly that not only did she ALREADY donate the money but that she did it because she wanted nothing in the divorce. AH chose to do both and got caught in doing none of it. That’s all on her. And yes, a large part of a defamation case is all about a person’s credibility so don’t play dumb and act like credibility had nothing to do with it. If it wasn’t a publicity stunt then why wait so long after the divorce was finalized and have the timing of so close to her first major movie role as a superhero to publish it? That seems fishy.
Yes AH, since you said you had pictures then they needed to match with the abuse you described. And not only did they not match the description, but for some events you had the same photos to represent two different dates. She never looked intimidated or scared to talk her supposed SA. AH never had medical records for any of them either and, again, based on her description of those events there would have to be medical records as the the injuries would have been too severe. And it would have taken weeks to recover from. Just because you say something happens doesn’t mean it happens.
Her demeanor and attitude and even the words coming out of her mouth screamed being vindictive. How is AH allowed to give Dateline these so called therapist notes when her current court case hasn’t been closed out and she is appealing it? Therapy notes are more consider medical notes. Also, those so-called notes seem to be in the same handwriting as her handwriting in her’s and JD’s love notebook they shared. Not to mention therapy notes are not long, drawn out words and sentences but rather short, abbreviated notes that are quickly written because they are writing as the patient speaks. They also MUST include dates and times on their notes for their records. AH’s so called notes had none. It is also interesting how this therapist had years of hearing her story yet AH never said her therapist encouraged her to seek help or report it or helped her make a plan. AH had her therapist on her witness list but her team never brought her in. Dr. Hughes also referred to that therapist’s notes during her testify.
Was there a trial by law held in the courtroom? Yes. Was there a trial by the public? Yes. Did the trial by public influence the trial in the courtroom? NO. And there is no evidence to state otherwise. Did the trial in the courtroom influence the trial by public? Yes. We were able to watch the trial from beginning to end and evaluate the witnesses and evidence on our own and make our own conclusion. Then when the public found you in the wrong we the people shared our opinion of you online just as our freedom of speech allows us to do. JD never “promised” any amount of humiliation according the the texts we saw, but simply said it would happen implying it would be because the truth would come out. If you’re going to quote sometime then quote it correctly. She had most of the world on her side for six years simply because she said (with no other evidence) she was the victim and then during the trial it came out she had been lying to us the whole time. Many people had turned their back on JD even though they were fans because of your accusations, they tried to “have your back”. Yes, the world is allowed to feel upset, angry, and hurt for being duped and lied to by you Ms. Heard for so long. And I do believe we the people would look you in the eye/face and tell you what we feel and think of you. Consequences of your actions, dear AH, isn’t always pleasant.
AH, you do care what people think of you or you wouldn’t be doing the interview. You don’t want to keep your private life private as you leaked information, wrote an Op-Ed, and are doing interviews sharing details of your private life. Yes, I would tell you that your are being treated fair as this is exactly what you put JD through for six years. Are the extremists taking it too far, maybe; but it’s not the majority. Being called names is nothing. Being called out on your lies is nothing. AH, you have no evidence that any juror member did anything they weren’t supposed to do. Not everyone is attached to SM like AH seems to be. AH doesn’t even know if they have any or which SM accounts. Do not insult these people who had to give up almost two months of their lives to listen to your trial. AH didn’t take responsibility for anything. She tried to come off as perfect and perfect doesn’t exist. So yes, that attitude will impact how people see you AH. And that viewpoint point won’t be good. Also, there were at least 20 witnesses that weren’t on any one’s pay roll/family/friend list. Offended that AH considers “randos” or “average” people as beneath her. There is nothing about her that makes her better than anyone else!
AH thinks so highly of herself that she assumes she has power over other DV cases. AH, you have no power over other cases or victims. Your case was all about you and JD (not to mention it was defamation case only) and EVERY CASE is different and evaluated as such! AH does not speak for anyone but herself. AH, you say you want to focus on being a mom and I’m sure you want to protect her (and that is admirable), yet you weren’t too concerned how two teenagers were going to have to grow up dealing with the mud you dragged their father in for the last six years while silencing his voice at the same time.
Throughout the interview she kept changing the tense of her stories, rarely referred to herself as a victim but says victims react to or do things in third person (which implies she isn’t one) and even slips and says JD would step away (implying yet again that he is the victim). AH is even looking all over the place at times. She also would flip between first and third person (third person implies the person talking wasn’t there doing what was being talked about but simply an observer) and she flipped between present and past tense (implies lying because you cannot keep the story straight). AH needs real help, not just a therapist or psychiatrist who will simply listen to and placate her. It seems that JD has already been seeking help for his issues and is actually getting better. This was a trial between two people NOT social movements contrary to what AH and her team want to believe. This trial isn’t women v men. This also isn’t about taking the right to speak away from anyone but about giving voice to someone who had been silenced. This trial is about finding the truth. In a small way it was about an abuser and a victim. It was about how the stereotypes of who an abuser and victim is is not always right. Abuse doesn’t know gender. Abuse doesn’t know stereotypes. If people really want to make this ONE CASE about a movement (which it is not), then JD helped the movement as well as broadened it by showing how a (male) victim can come in with the odds stacked against them, stick to and tell the truth, and then be heard and come out the victor.
An excellent summary
absolutely marvelous summary, im saving this
Going by the audio tapes and court, AH believes her voice should speak over all others, on and on, the only voice heard, until listeners agree to get a brief moment of silence. Living proof of nominative determinism.
BEAUTIFULLY WRITTEN ❤
It is so good to listen to your credible knowledgeable responses, Alyte. Like you, I watched the trial and listened to all witness testimony including AH. I started out expecting to find in her favour ( I am a vitim of SA/SV and DV) The words she is spinning in this interview do not make sense and are a contradiction to the facts which came out in the trial. If you say it enough times it doesn't make lies truth AH! It is insulting to the public and especially to victims of SA/SV and DV. I do hope you stop! Alyte, I wish that you and Camille V would get together and speak publicly to rubbish these accounts which are toxic. I feel embarrassed for AH having listened to her on the stand through that court process. ANYONE who watched the WHOLE TRIAL ESPECIALLY AH on the stand, could not feel anything but embarrassment and anger for her! It is wrong that she is allowed to continue. Thank you so much for all your time and skillful deliberations during the whole case and since. Bless you Alyte. Good to tune in again. x
Your video's are wholesome. You break down material in the nicest ways possible. Keep up the great work.
I studied narcissism for two years. There are different types and with each comes (some) differences in behavior. To me and many others watching the trial who have endured narcissistic abuse Amber's behavior from the beginning even before hearing Dr. Curry's diagnosis, of BPD and "Histrionic" BD (aka narcissism) we saw her malignant narcissism and recognized the narcissistic abuse that Johnny endured. It was very triggering, especially for survivors with C-PTSD stemming from the abuse. Amber's behavior is textbook which means if you look at a list of "Grandious Narcissistic" behavior then you will have 90% of your questions answered when asking why Amber reacts the way she does and responds to questions the way she does. She is so obvious she is constantly making a fool out of herself. She is an easy target for Social Media content. She is so predictable that Camille was able to easily bait her into anger with certain questions on the stand in order to make the real Amber shine through, showing who she really is. Amber will never be well or change, narcissists can't change and that's tragic because she was likely raised by an abusive narcissistic parent. Johnny must stay away from her giving her zero contact not taking the bait she's been dishing out since the trial ended. She would love a fight and cause even more chaos in his life so she can control the narrative and gain power over his reputation again by gaslighting the public and creating doubt. Keeping herself relevant and in the news. She has to have all the attention. She wanted him to give an interview after she did because that would give her material to tear apart in the media as I described. She wants to get him back in court so that she may get another chance to win. I wouldn't doubt if she's cheering on this Rocky guy promoting him in this recent lawsuit against JD. If Rocky wins then she will use similar accusations within it to defame Depp's reputation once more, giving validation to her lies. Anytime JD is in the news it will light a match, anytime she hears about an accomplishment it will cause her narcissistic ego to react because she just can't stand to see him happy or have his own power and freedom. Always remember that accusations from a narcissist are most always confessions. She talks about being angry about "men having all the power" men like Johnny. When in fact the real reason she is angry is that, she wants to have all the power, especially power over Johnny. He rejected her so now all she has is her minion Eve who soon she will burn as well and look for new supply.
If she doesn't consider paid witnesses, or experts, or friends or family valid, yet also doesn't consider NON paid everyday "Randos" valid, then who EXACTLY WOULD she consider valid and believelable? She literally excluded all people. So, essentially there is no one that could, or should be believed on JD's side.
Also on the stand she said the headline wasn't about Johnny, it was about something that happened to her after Johnny. Why aren't we talking about that? Why isn't she attacking that person who assaulted her.. Since the headline isn't about Johnny's "SA" Does Amber seem like a woman who would just let that go? No, because another person doesn't exist. She is still attacking Johnny. It's so sad and disturbing.
Herself. And only she is valid witness to everything.
Your first point is exactly the same comment I was going to make. She discounted “paid employees”, “randos”, and that leaves only JD to testify on his own behalf which Of course she would claim was lying. She basically then believes she should have gotten a “gimme” verdict which aligns perfectly with the Me2 position.
She could have waltzed into that courtroom and won if she had just made exactly that point and stayed away from rehashing all the allegations against him. If only she had followed her lawyers' advice, but she couldn't help herself. It was always about destroying his life.
@@SacredForest347 Agree. I think she could have won of she didn't won if she didn't try to claim he BRUTALLY abused her the way she did. Her evidence totally contrary to her account of ALL incidence, including Johnny's.
They aren't really "randos" either. They're people who had valid reasons to be there and were their knowledge backed up by evidence (that they did those jobs). A true rando would be some person who claimed to have walked by and seen an altercations, that person would have not true evidence they were there at the right moment. Jonnhy's "randos" were essentially known witnesses that chose to step forward. Had they come to her defence she would have called them very important unbiased witnesses no doubt.
She is a horrible actress. She makes my skin crawl.
She should go back to being a stripper.I bet she can do that very well!
She makes world's skin crawl....
Exactly! She just makes me sick! Every time I hear her voice now “I just Cringe” and when I see her I actually feel sick to my stomach! She is so vile and evil it’s scary! If she could do that to her husband, someone who she supposedly loves, then the rest of the world better look out!
I feel like she wants that injunction. So she can just be like “i was silenced by a powerful man!”
I really hope Johnny's lawyers get an injunction to stop Scamber. Otherwise she will never stop. We all want to get on with our lives after the case.
Imagine being Johnny and having your abuser given a platform to continue her abuse after all these years. She's disgusting.
dont see why the judge doesnt hold her in contempt
she will run out of resources eventually... either that or we will find some spicy onlyfans leaks :D
It’s sickening to listen to her try to convince people of the same lies AND THEN insult you because you don’t believe HER.
@@paulaross4495 insulting other people is legal. can't do much here.
When she started the accusations media were in her side, defending her and destroying JD, he lose jobs, he stayed quiet. At UK audios released and people start changing their minds. Not because we don’t believe her but we started to looking closely and it’s undeniable who is the abuser in that relationship
Congrats Alyte! I saw pics of your wedding celebration on twitter! It was so sweet of you to invite #Iambobbylondon, and I'm so glad that he was able to make it! Also, wow, leave it up to lawyers to buy plane tickets from all over the world to celebrate with you!
it seems she is being backed by some corp and now they trying to silence youtubers who dare expose her lies. this monster needs to go to prison
“She’s so broke”, I wonder who’s paying for that business that is trying to silence Twitter accounts and UA-cam accounts.
Perhaps News Corp who own the The Sun that defamed Depp with the 'wife-beater' article and also own Talk Radio where the article writer Dan Wootton worked at. Which also employed Robert Palmer, son of Judge Nicol who decided the verdict against Depp in the UK trial. News Corp could certainly afford to fund Amber and they also own the New York Post which was posting pro-Amber articles throughout the trial often cherry picking and twisting facts to fit their false narrative.
More then that, she needs to being stripped of her property till she paid her bills. She’s already lost her credibility so lower as that will not happen but making sure she never hurts other people, that can we all do. Boycott every movie she played or will play in. Boycott the industry that hires her again.
You're onto something because every big media outlet I see is still trying to call up support for her
I agree. There's also something fishy with Elaine who apparently went to the UK trial as an 'observer'. Why and on whose dime?
According to Dr.Curry AH will always have to have the last word, again & again
All the cuts in the final product aired Friday shows Amber must have had final editing rights....imo
I see the edits as a sign that she was so far off her rocker that this was the best NBC could do given what they had to cut to avoid legal repercussions for giving her a platform to defame him further.
This is so wild to me because I can't even exaggerate a funny story for bigger laughs out of fear that I would be exposed as a liar. It just...never occurs to me that other people don't get that same nauseated feeling when being dishonest
Yet More thoughtful analysis! Thank you 🙏
Thank you so much, Louise!!
Amber Heard counter sued Adam Waldman for defamation, so by her own admission she was trying to take away Adam's voice.
I just have to say, I love your honesty in this. You are the kind of lawyer I wanted to be when I was younger. Never made it because I became a single mom, but I think your awesome!!
For people who haven’t been through domestic violence and violent essay feel that they can’t really say they could agree or disagree with Amber saying that she’s still loves Johnny
But I have been through both of those for A year and a half and that was 28 years ago.
To this day I hate my ex and what he did to me and our son.
And there’s no way I would ever say I love him. That is not reality and everyone who’s been in DV and essay absolutely would not still be in love with their abuser!
That’s just bullshit!!!
Thanks, I've seen this interview ad nauseam from many lawtube and psychology channels but wanted to check yours as well! I absolutely crack up when you get to a point 'what.. what...' :-D
Alyte I hope you get back to 250k subscribers and beyond. You deserve it!
You did SUCH a good job of this Alyte. Particularly pointing out the case for REAL DV survivors.
Great work 🙌🏻
Amber: “Don’t believe what you see and hear. Believe what I say only”
What a manipulator. And someone who likes to be in control. These people are only effective on people who can’t think for themselves
Thank you so much for the way you break things down and make it easier to understand how the Judicial System works.
Itś disappointing to see that based on this interview she didn´t learn anything from the case. Would think that having all that dirty laundry out there like that for 6 weeks to face would make a person go "Whoa, I really need to have look at myself, this is not good!" But she seems to have an opposite reaction, she is doubling down. 😞
My comment is months after you made this video and the interview aired… This is an excellent video. You nailed it when saying AH had an expectation to be the MeToo warrior and public opinion to side with her during the Trial. She was listening to the woke narrative of Legacy Media.
My experience with this trial: 1) prior to it, I wasn't a Depp fan, and I thought AH had some reasonable claims; 2) during trial, she started to smell rotten; 3) After trial, I'm a JD fan, and AH disgusts me. I've come to the healthy conclusion that she doesn't suffer from borderline personality disorder, she suffers from over-the-line personality disorder.
NBC proved why we don't trust MSM, the cutting of things they aired in teasers earlier in the week that make what was said look in a better light. In theory both sides are treated the same in court. It appears to me that occured in this trial the same amount of time allowed by both and neither side was allowed to bring everything they wanted in. If AH's team had stopped focusing so much on JD's drug use they would have had more time to work with.
I love how when delivering her performance on the stand she says:
(In an angry tone) 'Johnny, you hit me '
Quickly followed by a dramatic and oh soo sad 'you hit me'
I can't believe she was a paid actress.
My favorite part of these videos is when Alyte says "What?" Makes me giggle every time
Doctors and therapists are MANDATED reporters. If she disclosed the abuse and because Depp had children underage the therapist would have had to report the abuse to proper channels
I am so glad to hear your takes. I love your insight.
In another video on UA-cam they explained the situation around the courthouse. Within a minute the car is on the main road. So 4 to 6 blocks of people with signs ???
They used Google maps and streetview :-)
Ohhhh I saw that one! It was fascinating
I love your reactions throughout the video! I can totally relate!
The only come back story I want to see is a Johnny Depp comeback story. I want to see his next movie hit box office gold.
American judicial system for lawsuits is HORRIBLE . The jury based the entire 15 million dollar payout on “she made be feel awkward when she kept looking at us” I mean shouldn’t it be beyond a reasonable doubt when 15 million dollars is on the line ? How do we know Johnny didn’t bottle Amber . None of us were there in the hotel room that night
1:00:05 VICTIM!! She said during her testimony that she NEVER had said that she was a VICTIM and that Camille absolutely could NOT call her a VICTIM but still, here she is stating it clear as day - I AM A VICTIM!!
How is it gonna be Amber?? You can’t have it both ways!! You can’t ALWAYS BE RIGHT!!!
This interview really makes me boil inside!!! She is despicable and she can’t remember her own lies, she contradict herself all of the time!!
There is now a campaign targeted at UA-cam channels that encourage discussion about the Depp/Heard trial. It was really obvious when a psychology channel is targeted. One doctor consistently urged the viewers to be fair and see both sides, but most time had obvious compassion for Heard which we understood as he treats people with BPD and other similar disorders. The psychologist was more willing to concede that Heard exhibited traits of BPD once he got through Heard’s testimony, however stated AH could still have been abused by Depp to the irritation of some of his followers.
Suddenly, there are commenters on the videos speaking about DARVO and “stonewalling”, mass manipulation of the public etc. Also blatant attempts to twist the interpretation of the audio snippets, even contradicting Heard’s own explanations on the stand. Instead of denying Heard may have abused Depp, him seeking to leave a physical fight is now abuse on Heard (twisted interpretation of “stonewalling”in relationships)
The comments have nothing to do with psychology and introduced an atmosphere I’ve only ever seen on Twitter. If this is all a PR campaign, this is disturbing. People watched the trial and came to their conclusions, so did the jury. So why do I feel as if my mind is being bombarded daily to make me feel I am stupid and need someone else to help me form my opinions?
How is this image rehabilitation for AH? Couldn’t a softer approach to invoke empathy about psychological disorders or discussions about consequences of toxic relationship on the mental state further their cause in a better way?
Narcissists want two things. 1. Attention. Any attention. Positive or negative. Doesn’t matter. 2. Revenge. Narcissistic injury leads to rage and an all out war on the person who rejected them. And the rage is so strong that they can’t see how their actions are hurting them the most. They are hyper focused on destroying the other person at any cost.
I felt Amber was abused. I was born into an abusive family. My father was the abuser and my mom stayed with him for many, many years. I lived the abuse, saw the abuse and that’s why I believe Amber. There are times when the abused will stand up to the abuser. That doesn’t mean they have complete control. My mom hid the abuse and I hate how people question why Amber didn’t report it, that’s part of the abusive relationship…invoking enough fear and having enough manipulation to scare the other from saying or doing anything. She may be a liar and may have done things others don’t understand, but I wholeheartedly believe she was honest about being abused.
@@deliahfigueroa9799 I'm sorry for what you and your mom went through.
Did you watch the trial though or at least all her testimony? I started from AH testimony onward and then went back to the beginning.
I was totally freaked by the abuse she described, but something about the way she described things was just weird. By the time the cross-examination was over, I doubted most of her testimony but I still wanted to believe her. I dug up everything I could find on the case and that was it. No one can be sure she wasn't abused at all, but Depp didn't do all those horrible things she described. You cannot heal that kind of damage in a day, not even one week. It can't be hidden with makeup. A person has to go to a doctor and/or hide away for a long time, theres no bouncing back the next day. The audio submitted into evidence was even more disturbing. You can go to the court web page and listen to the full audios from both sides.
Her voice and her words triggered me, sent me back in time to a relationship when I was much younger. I could not identify with AH, but I can identify with JD even though he is a man. I've been in similar arguments, taken crap from someone who claimed to love, made to believe they acted they way they did because of me. They always wanted to fight. It was always my fault. AH portrayed herself almost like an angel, refused to admit to ever abusing her ex even though her own recordings showed that she did. She was unreal.
Not reporting abuse should never be the issue. I believe she lost because she lied repeatedly. Her pictures of slight bruising or redness didn't match up to the extreme damage she described. If she was punched over and over in the face, how can she look picture perfect the next day?
She may actually have a behavioral disorder but it doesn't excuse her actions. A lawyer can explain better why she lost the case, but Dr. Courtney Tracy and some of the other psychologists on UA-cam helped me empathize with AH at least a little.
I would love for her to acknowledge that she needs legit help and actually get it, but it won't happen.
Alyte I've watched the whole trial, this whole interview, & everybody's rebuttal to it. It can be so incredibly frustrating. Your calmness & knowledge makes me feel sooo much better!!!!
Excellent!
i always enjoy your content, thanks for taking time out of your girls holiday, i look forward to many more videos in the future 💙 💙💙
I feel your exasperation Aleta. You're expecting someone who has no morality who is used to manipulating people by lying and getting away with it. This interview is her putting out to the public who didn't watch the trial her version of the truth without all that pesky evidence.
Many have said the therapist notes are in Amber's writing. Also a therapist can't testify whether what Amber told her is true. Rob Lumber Law clarified this topic really well.
Hopefully in Amber's invisible writing, just like her court notes
I've worked in the medical field and the therapist would have had those notes typed up and put them in a file not a binder. They would have also written a care plan.
And a therapist in California is considered a mandatory reporter. If the notes were believable it would have been the therapist's duty to report the danger to the client.
@@SacredForest347 not true. Mandatory reporting is for children, disabled and dearly. Only medical Dr's need to report. Therapists are totally different
They slipped over the part about DV victims not having the resources "you or I have"... so uh... where did that go?
As someone who took the stand at 16 against my own father for SA, I can say with certainty that as terrifying and grueling as that was, it was NOT more terrifying than the actual ordeal. Can't speak for everyone, of course. Every person is different, but her behavior has never aligned with her narrative to me. I couldn't eat or sleep during the trial. I was weak and pale for days, even after it was over. I was heartbroken, and still am sixteen years later. It's a different kind of grief, and I don't see that in AH.
So sorry you had to go through that. But I’m proud of you for standing you, for being brave.
Your fantastic 🥂🌻 stay beautiful
I wish I found your channel sooner. You make her interview sound like a joke on AH`s part, and I love that, and also when you commented to her statements "lies, lies, lies,lies, lies ,lies.."🤣!!!!!!! One thing I have to address, JD has lived with this person for many tears, and his name ruined for 6 years, its actually almost 10 years with being bullied+++++
Je t’adore, Alyte! Beaucoup Beaucoup Beaucoup!!! I straight up had a authentic and potent case of the giggles for a solid 5-7mins when you said “she’s trying to make fetch happen!” Chef’s kiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiissssss for that one.
You’re 1 of ~3 (of over easily 100 channels) that I subscribe to where I turn on allll alerts for. I have also taken up doing a happy wiggle in my chair while mouthing “Yay! Yay! Yay!” when I see new uploads from you show up 🙃
Can’t wait for the next one - I hope to join a live stream sometime too! But, for now, I shall thank you again for this A1 Content and wish you the most lovely morning, afternoon, evening, or night (Actually, I choose alllllll the above too)!!!
🫶 from Canada 🇨🇦 🍁,
Virginia Ann (a new and cheerful fan!)
Salut, Virginia, et merci! Your comment put a big smile on my face, and I'm so glad to have you as part of the crew. Have a great day :)
@@LegalBytesMedia - well look at that then! Two smiles!
“Listen to the version of me that didn’t think that a jury would ever believe a man could be a victim of abuse”
In my experience, in dealing with the justice system, was being told I'm a liar, and having to talk about what happened to many strangers was very traumatic. But I could never consider that to be a worse experience than the actual ass*ult. He plead guilty the day before trial to receive lesser charges. That sucked. Arguably the worst part of my experience with the justice system was during a recent hearing (since he broke multiple terms of probation) where he threw a pity party for himself because it is difficult to find work or a place to live as a registered s*x offender. Still doesn't even touch the trauma of the actual ass*ult.
❤
I can’t wait to see if you talk about her filing to have the case thrown out so to speak because of the juror who spoke out against her and how they lied about who they were
Amber: "I don't want to relitigate..."
Also Amber: (Alleged) Repeats the defamation.
One thought I had is that it would seem to me a ton of Johnny fans outside the courthouse would give the jury the impression his career was not so harmed. So would this not potentially harm his case more than hers?
“The grumpy left in the bed” I’m dying! I’ve never heard it called that before lol nice break down, thanks for the vid. Subbed!
There was a video of her getting out of a car to do a speech about DV and there happened to be a deaf person there and coincidentally she was able to speak ASL to him. They signed for a few minutes while everyone stared and then they hugged and people were awed. It looked like a PR stunt to me so people can like her even more. It was uncomfortable cause she does these things that make you believe she's a wonderful caring person, but we see how she is behind closed doors.
Love your insight! Thank you for all your hard work!
Also adding that in the weeks of JD's testimony, the panel for this channel were concerned it made HIM look bad. As soon as she started giving her testimony, that opinion shifted.
Then followed by weak "evidence" from her side.
It wasn't Johnny's 3 and a half weeks of testimony that turned everyone against her and supposedly brainwashed the jury... It was her own BS that she spewed.
I really hope she gets the help she needs and sees that one day.
And I pray she doesn't poison her daughter's mind with these lies
She looks completely different than days before. She looked older in court, she even looks thinner now. Oh look, it's Grace Kelly in "Country Girl". She wore a costume every day. American Airlines pilot, Darth Vader meets Princess Leia, Girl Johnny Depp...
The bailiff wouldn’t allow you to even wear a T-shirt about Johnny Depp or Amber they made you turn the T-shirt inside out or leave the court room.
Therefore looking at the galley The jury could not possibly know Who was for Depp or Heard.
As to people lined up to go into court. There were in the line Depp
AND Heard supporters.
So if the jurors saw the long line outside the court room they Likely would have assumed The line had both supporters in the same line.
It’s only Amber trying to convince the public that there were indicators of only Depp supporters because she knows people were not in line and they were not in the court room.
Thank goodness it was on live TV so that at least you tubers can prove she lied though it would be nice if Court TV showed it as well to prove to the world that she’s lying again!
On the first day I actually thought all the women in the courtroom and seated on her side were there for her! It wasn’t until Johnny turned around at the end of the day to wave at them that I realized they were all there for him!
Lies, lies and more lies. If I could cast her in one role, it is Cersei from GoT.
What she says us not republication, because she is now directly calling JD an abuser herself, not indirectly and denying authorship.
Now if she said it started in 2011, it seems to me that she planned to accuse him (now this is the third date change of when the abuse happened?) from when she met him. Calculating.
Just because AH can’t imagine going any amount of time not on social media, or not watching the news, doesn’t mean everyone is like that. Believe it or not, there are people who don’t watch the news, or even cable tv, but rather streaming services. There are people who don’t use Twitter 24/7, aren’t on Tik Tok, and aren’t on Instagram, or even UA-cam. The only reason I was even aware of the case is because I watch UA-cam. I don’t use other social media bc it is terrible for my mental health. I avoid the news for the same reason. Shocking, I know. I can’t imagine how much that concept would totally blow her mind.
Amber has unlimited publicity as long as she continues to make a fool of herself. I think this is fine for someone suffering from NPD. They don't care what people think because they don't know what people think because they have no empathy. She's fine being the villain as long as she gets plenty of attention. I really hope the Virginia courts have the strength to punish her for her perjury and constant defamation, she's used to getting a pass in life because she was previously attractive, but Judge Azcarate or someone has to stand up to her.
You’re the best btw, love your channel, thanks for doing what you do!
I think real honesty needs to come first. Honesty with herself, not with others. At least today, I don't believe she is capable of honesty.
i'm glad you mentioned the tone and the context as for what someone would look for in a statement. It's key to understanding why most of the evidence is in favour of Depp. His behaviour is consistence with his recordings.
I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that those that could be deceived by what she is saying in this interview, are those who did not WATCH her full testimony and cross and all of the trial! She is expert at deception but watching the full trial it is easy to see her ridiculous acting as a 'survivor' completely cringe and UNcredible! It angers me too Alyte!!
The funny thing is, and what is made clear by the juxtaposition between this interview and her testimony, is that she is absolutely not a master of deception. NBC had to do all kinds of editing with the cut of the interview, the emotional music, the voiceovers, the cinematography, and selective questions in order to make any of what she said in the interview at all believable or sympathetic. When left on her own to attempt deceiving without help, she flounders and fails and it’s so obvious, and that’s what was shown by her in her testimony.
But I think that's exactly the audience AH is aiming for. There are people who didn't watch the trial, but want to know a bit of what happened (maybe because it's a hot topic but they don't have the time). If these people only receive information from mainstream media like this interview, they would look things from AH's twisted angle. That worries me more then angering me.
@@chiao-juhung796 yes, I agree, those people need to hear what legitimate and credible 'lawtubers' put out there. Shame on those media outlets that are peddling the AH twisted narrative!
@@Emnms68 yes, you're absolutely right. I would have been more correct to say 'her attempts at deception are an embarrassment.' If she was good at it, those watching her testimony would not be struggling so much with the ridiculous display she put on.