Surprised no on has claimed it's a Marvel "Easter Egg" about how Thanos first got his idea to wipe out half the population. I'm too dumb to piece it together, but a smart MCU fan could make the theory work.
This is so ridiculously well-acted. Comedies don't get enough credit for that; dramatic acting is always given the praise but this cast and this scene in particular is a masterclass in comedic acting. Just brilliant.
Also, most comedians can be great dramatic actors. It's been said that a good comedian can be a great dramatist, but a good dramatist won't necessarily be good at comedy.
Exogen Roar Precisely. So many comedians have ventured into dramatic work and knocked it out of the park; Robin Williams, Steve Carrell, Louis CK (despite the allegations), and more.
@@AS-mv7tm this is a myth. Seinfeld has talked about how he'd try to put his comic friends in episodes and they'd suck at acting. Bob odenkirk does a barely passable job in breaking bad/better call saul. Comedians are about as good at acting as anyone else.
@@jhk6558: I disagree. You more often find comedians acting than any other type of person, and acting fairly well. _"Bob odenkirk does a barely passable job in breaking bad/better call saul."_ That's a nice opinion you have there. Most would disagree.
jhk655 Considering Bob has been nominated for numerous awards for his dramatic acting, I'd say he does more than a "passable" job. Sounds like your personal biases are clouding your judgment.
PeacefulJoint Well he cant read anything on the board since hes illiterate maybe just slapping red symbols on a scientists face was enough for him to be shocked lmao
Mark McElroy It's still one of those things that only holds up if you don't put it under any pressure. He did call it a false equivalency, and he's right. You are overwhelmingly more likely to have a mostly accurate picture of the world by accepting the consensus view of the world's experts in their respective fields, views constructed by analyzing the world through the scientific method, than you are by believing just one of the countless creation myths produced more than a thousand years ago. Science isn't about being right, it's about progressively becoming less wrong, and not getting too attached to one view of the world to let it go when it's proven to be wrong. Even scientists need to trust the word of scientists in other fields, because human endevour has become so vast and specialized that it's impossible for anybody to become an expert in everything in less than a lifetime.
Yeah but you can't just believe everything someone says because "science" backs it. Especially psychology and well everything revolving around health. Health studies constantly change, one minute trans fat is okay if not good for you, the next it's bad for you; the same with saturated fat. I read a few psychology studies and their conclusions were almost the exact opposite of what the studies actually found, it's pretty ridiculous. And since no one will read the damn study, news agencies can have headlines like "Men are okay with rape." But in the study itself it says 99% of men aren't okay with rape, but since the study found 100% of women aren't okay with rape, obviously that means men are okay with rape in their mind. There's just a lot political motivations to push bullshit in psychology. So you have to be somewhat skeptical of almost everything that you haven't read about yourself. Or you're just acting like a peasant who believes everything the priest says that god wants, because he's supposedly the voice of god. Also the scientific method is a little broken right now, in a lot universities your study won't be publish unless your conclusion matches your hypothesis, so it's basically forcing people to lie or they wasted their time and possibly their money.
LordClansman there's clickbait in scientific journals too. Also skewed research with highly coincidental outcomes usually in studies funded by special interests
True scientific journals also show bias in who they select to publish, although this bias is probably less so than in other areas. Peer review is far from perfect. Bias still exists, and will continue to exist as long as there is a human element. Bias and junk science is particularly prevalent in courts of law. There is no shortage of medical experts who will advance junk science for a pretty penny. For example, the NFL and NHL, as well as bike helmet manufacturers, have all been sued multiple times, sometimes in class actions suits by people advancing junk science that asserts that football and hockey cause progressive brain diseases (CTE) when in fact the disease is fictional, and the rate of progressive brain diseases in athletes is even less so than the general public.
This scene makes me even more pissed off that this show hasn't won any awards. So well acted, and so much complexity to the concept. The way Dennis sounds as he's being backed into a corner, and how Mac's smug debate voice is so accurate, just blows my mind.
smartest few minutes in the whole series. perfect writing. how this show's depth is not appreciated worldwide is startling. the new seasons aren't even advertised.
This latest season had the highest viewership of any season so far. Still a drop in the bucket compared to the mass-ingested crap on regular tv, but a positive sign!
I love this show just for the fact that in almost every scene that takes place in Paddy's, there are one or two customers drinking off-screen. Imagine being the lucky customer and watching a real live theatre comedy play out.
My wife is a gaffer and I've been there done that... it's tough not to laugh sometimes. Watching these guys work over the years there are few mistakes made and production runs smoothly.
The most painful part of watching this is that there are so many people who really wouldn't know how to respond to this IRL and it does cause science to look stupid. Insanely smart writing and I hate it.
I mean the truth is science has reached a point where you have to conduct ridiculously meticulously planned experiments to come up with an answer to a small question. That's what science students are trained to do for 10 years to get a PhD. The average person couldn't replicate any of the experiments which are published in journals today. The average person is therefore left with no choice but to 'trust' the findings of the scientific community and take their word for it.
Chandan Bhowal Outside of rudimentary science, I couldn’t speak on really anything found in a scientific journal with any confidence because I would have zero idea how to back the information up. I am pro science but it’s extremely hard for those who don’t study that field. Plus both political isles in the USA LOVE to bastardize science in the name of partisanship and in the past 20 years a lot of science has become warped and presented in biased ways to fit a narrative presented by whatever party is presenting. Independent reviewed studies are more important that ever in today’s society.
and then we found out that pluto isn't actually a planet and it made us all look like a "bitch", then a few years later we found out that it turns out that pluto is actually a planet. and we looked like a "bitch" again.
***** I guess I prefer jokes that use logic. I'm not sure how you can tell if I have an attitude or not though. Or is this a tactic to make the opposition in an argument look like the "emotional" one? hmm..
Allison Rose Everything should be taken with skepticism. Anyways you're speaking broadly because you have no actual point. The earth is not flat, btw. (although i would love to see an episode of IASIP where they argue that subject).
Allison Rose also, learn how to properly use the term "ironic". "because there is none."... i guess you've never heard of carbon dating. :/ Stay in school, kiddo.
Nye and Tyson were always nothing more than cringy, uneducated TV scientists. It’s still funny how people took this long to realize it. Would be quite fun to watch Mac debunk them.
Marian Elesha Exactly. Well said. You can never argue with a fool because they will always try to change the subject when they feel they are losing ground.
I know most people won’t read this but I feel compelled to explain why this scene is the most brilliant piece of comedy I’ve ever seen. 1 - Nothing is wasted. Every detail, from scene design to timing, has a purpose and draws the viewer into the world and it’s characters (the death bells... monkeys and buff dudes on posters... like what are those graphs next to Aristotle? 😂😂😂) 2 - The way Mac and Dennis are written here well defines their characters which highlights their conflict of opinion. Honestly can’t think of another scene in the show that draws them out so sharply (Mac is so... Mac, same for Dennis). The climax and resolution effectively uses the entire cast to satirize the views of protagonist/antagonist without overextending into hyperbole and maintaining relatability 3 - Serves as a witty commentary on entrenched positions on politics, science, and religion in modern American culture with historical references adeptly woven in. All while alluding to a deeper age old conflict, always lurking, but never ending. And where does this ancient battle pop up this time? Paddy’s freaking Pub! 5 - In a rare role reversal, Dennis, despite having the crowd with him and Mac’s obvious flaws, is outshone and forced to take a back seat to Mac, flipping their usual dynamic upside down. 4 - Mac and Dennis’s exchange employs logic and rhetoric that is so crisp and digestible but stays complex. Did Mac use shaky emotional appeals in establishing his argument? Of course he did because he’s Mac, and he doubles down because he’s an American 😂! And even though Dennis starts making counter claims that should win out logically, Mac is able take that strength of Dennis’s “leap of faith” argument, pull out the rug from under him, and turn it against him due to his hubris. That dramatic turn is what makes the whole scene so memorable to me. I seriously think it could be used as a jumping off point for a case study in writing, history, logic, rhetoric, psychology, culture, and comedy. I love this scene, and you should too. And don’t go trying to change my mind, because I’m dug in and I’ll never change
I had a similar conversation at a bar in Nashville in 2014. My response to "have you seen these fossils and examined the records yourself?" was "I can see the fossils in the museum, and if I choose to study that side then I can verify the records myself just as thousands around the world do every year as part of their post-graduation studies. Till then, I can choose to go with the global checks and balances in place that help ensure all ideas and claims can be examined internationally". The international nature of science was something my conversation partners acknowledged that they hadn't considered.
hal the greatest that's kind of the point. No matter how logical science may be, 99% of its believers never actually look at the data to confirm its truth. We take what teachers tell us in school and what scientist say on tv or in magazines and accept it. As a result hardly anyone can argue the actual science behind evolution. Not unless you've "poured through the data yourself, the numbers, the figures."
Circular logic... Mac uses the knowledege of modern science to show how old scientists and philosophers were wrong. So he has to pick one. Either he believes in modern science enough to show old old scientists were wrong, in which case he'd have to be knowledgeble himself to discredit evolution, or he doesn't believe modern science. In which case, he'd have to deny all the body of knowledge in the field of physics, quantum mechanics, chemistry, etc, which allow him to drive cars, fly on planes and talk to people on the phone.
Bernardo W. he's not trying to refute science as a whole, just a certain segment of it (evolution). You don't have to either believe or disbelieve every single part of science, which is a very broad disciple.
But ted, isn't he trying to show how aristoles was wrong by believeing the earth was the center of the universe, therefore proving that scientists make mistakes? Which he can then only prove by basing himself in the knowledge provided by modern science, which tells us the earth isn't even the center of our solar system?. :) Therefore, circular logic. He refutes modern science's legitimacy by basing himself in arguments sustained by modern science.
From "scientists make mistakes" to "evolution isn't real" is a big leap. He's using circular logic and ad hominem falacies to discredit science, when he himself doesn't have any concrete argument to disprove the theory of evolution (a scientific theory, therefore based in observed facts). The only thing he MAY have proved, is the lack of knowledge by Dennis. Which, is not the same for everyone. High-school level biology and geology gives you a pretty good grasp as to why Evolution is most likely a real thing (paleonthology, geology, microbiology, embriology, etc). Therefore, he himself, is the person he is criticizing. Therefore, and again, circular logic.
Carothy Well you can’t put all theology classes together haha. I mean, Catholicism, the largest religion in the world, clearly states that evolution is real (I’m Catholic). Some theology classes do teach that everything the Bible says is fact, but those are fundamentalists, those who take every Bible word as fact. These are also the type of people to believe being gay is a sin though so... 😂
I love this show. there are so many shows that have biased political views and just preach them in such an obnoxious manor. but not this show, its always just hilarious.
+Alex F. Yep. Most shows do like what they did in the Emmys. The guy said, Donald Trump is racist. Then to make things even he went after the Democrats as well. And he said Bernie Sanders looks like he's always late for a plane. Calling a guy a racist is so much worse than making fun of a guys appearance. But then they get to say " see we made fun of both parties".
+joe momma Well Donald Trump is the one with records of racism from previous employees and is the one generalizing Mexicans as rapists. If Bernie Sanders did shit like that, they would make fun of it. They resort to his appearance because he isn't acting like a goddamn moron on stage. It's not their fault one candidate is so much more of a baffoon.
The problem is He proved that a normal person can't proof evolution right but neither did he prove evolution wrong nor did he proof that god created man. He exposed the hypocrisy but he never proved evolution wrong.
@@pravinrao3669 He didn't even expose hypocrisy. Trusting the field of biologists with decades of experience studying biology and doing experiments to speak about biology is in no way the same as trusting a group of people with little to no training in biology who oppose a theory that has been solidified by the scientific community for several decades if not centuries. You shouldn't trust your priest about whether your house is safe if the civil engineer inspectors were telling you it was not safe and the priest was telling you it was safe. So we shouldn't do it for any other subject for which there are legitimate experts with data and proof. It was good comedy, though.
@@lambdachi493 Keep thinking people with decades of experience in biology are equivalent to people with no experience, it doesn't seem to be working for you!
I mean, it was pretty interesting that it was based on several true stories, but why did the professor have to die, especially before he apologized to his wife?
The argument from authority is only a fallacy if it's a false authority. Citing scientific consensus is an actual authority, hence the argument is valid.
@@VashTheDamnFiend No, scientific consensus isn't always changing. The theory of natural selection has now been consensus for nearly a 100 years and it takes decades for theories to become scientific consensus. It's the least changing thing in all of science. Also, I don't know what you could mean by "the establishment", this term is meaningless.
The irony of this skit is brilliant, juxtaposed with the gullible comments makes it a masterpiece. The exact reason as to why he doesn't believe the scientist, is the exact reason it works. Lmfao brilliant
I know it's sarcasm, but an inherent property of science is of course that there is no truth :D. Theories can get additional help of new hypotheses, but if there are too many problems a new theoretical framework has to be established. Kind of like a paradigm shift, although I think a paradigm shift is too extreme, since most of the time a new theory also includes parts of the previously accepted theory. Besides that, I think God and evolution theory are compatible if by God is meant everything that there is (not a sole being that influences our decisions or some sh1t). In this Spinozist view on God (even though Spinoza claims God is all material and also everything beyond the material world) you are god, your friend, your mum, I am, your fav pillow, the ice cream you might eat this summer, the rock in the dessert, the sun, the atoms, our emotions, everything. Well ehh, I Kinda got lost typing, have a Nice day y'all!
i love how this show can have some amazing satirical humour. It takes an issue and unlike many shows it doesnt take sides, it just shows how people from both sides of the argument can be stupid sometimes. Same with the gun control episode, it just shows both sides in a stupid funny way without forcing their beleifs on the viewer, Refreshing since most shows on tv usually take the liberal point of view to make satirical humour
Ralph Richter Pretty sure I read somewhere he turned out to be right and there were some weird chemicals that were altering the sex of some species of frog. Better question though would be why are we being so autistic about a humorous anecdote?
ando1135 well, mister smarty pants, would you mind telling us a hole/flaw in the theory? (not that it's a sound theory, it's just you keep commenting all over the place and seem like an ass )
how is reading a bible some guy wrote any different than reading a book some scholar wrote on evolution? how can the latter be a valid reason for religion being true but not for evolution? that is the flaw in his argument if all you based creationism/evolution was in what he said.
Only government mandated scientists are allowed to speak, there are many extremely well qualified scientists with miles of data proving this ridiculous hoax. Don't worry, a filthy piece of cloth on your face and standing away from people will save you. History will not look favourable at how stupid humanity are being right now, thank God many across the world are waking up.
Well, no, he IS making a good point. You can't really have an informed position on the issue unless you look at the data yourself. There are tons of scientific papers that claim things based on their data, but if you look at the data and figures in those same papers closely, those conclusions are often actually not consistent with the data. Scientists often make leaps or false conclusions (not necessarily intentionally). Anyone interested in having an informed position should look at the source data rather than just reading and trusting someone else's conclusion.
Charlie's face when Mac calls Aristotle a bitch is pure gold.
I like his face at 2:14 better
i enjoyed his reaction @0:49
Newton face is better when he found out that Newton died from eating mercury - just like he probably does.
Aaron Rodriguez 1:32
Hey, just thought I'd add another Rodriguez to the mix
I just noticed the look on Charlie's face when Mac said Newton died from eating Mercury. It makes me think Charlie has been eating mercury.
Holy fuck. Genius
2:11 he’s like, you can die from that?!
Charlie is illiterate. Charlie is trying to figure out how Newton ate a planet..not the element
Shit I didn’t even think about mercury the planet haha
Mercury is in most cases fine to eat unless you have a stomach ulcer or something where it can pass into the blood. We pass it just fine
"I won't change my mind on anything, regardless of the facts in front of me."
I'm dug in. Because I'm an American! 😂😂😂😂
Trumpters
@@marcosorduno9203 Most people
*PEER REVIEW*
'Penises cause climate change' cited by Malcolm Roberts (2:08)
ua-cam.com/video/pwsbh0-vHQE/v-deo.html
*PHILOSOPHY*
If There Is No God, Murder Isn't Wrong (5:17) Dennis Prager
ua-cam.com/video/yrcQ_PTkVD4/v-deo.html
113 Real life Zombies, actual Magic Spells, and The Neverending Story (1:59:45)OwenBenjamin
ua-cam.com/video/FwnC2M-2z_o/v-deo.html
In Defense of Masculinity (Nice Try, Gillette...) (19:30) The Asian Capitalists
ua-cam.com/video/SwU45GT_x24/v-deo.html
Dennis Prager's Top 10 Ways Liberalism Makes America Worse (40:39) lhghvideo
Published on Aug 30, 2011.townhall.com/tipsheet/
ua-cam.com/video/Uj9qvBwOeMA/v-deo.html
Fireside Chat Ep. 78 - Save Your Dog or Save a Stranger?(29:03)PragerU - Apr 18, 2019
ua-cam.com/video/buhmMN8ZMrI/v-deo.html
Alex Jones - God Doesn't Know Where He Came From | Joe Rogan (7:48) JRE Clips - Feb 27, 2019
ua-cam.com/video/wsrcYiTTNQU/v-deo.html
What's a Greater Leap of Faith: God or the Multiverse? (4:25) PragerU - Apr 23, 2018
ua-cam.com/video/ymajOjVQPm4/v-deo.html
Eye for an Eye: One of the Greatest Ideas in History (5:22) PragerU - Apr 2, 2018
ua-cam.com/video/UrakW1DjApo/v-deo.html
Is There Life After This Life? (5:17) PragerU - Jan 8, 2018
ua-cam.com/video/covUnyZGVaQ/v-deo.html
"I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist" by Dr. Frank Turek (1:38:31)
Faith and Public Policy - Engage Conference - Jan 15, 2016
Engage California Conference 2015 - Session 3 - Calvary Chapel Chino Hills, CA
ua-cam.com/video/_sgxYiuTJNo/v-deo.html
*EVOLUTION*
The Failure of Darwin's Theory - Dr. Stephen Meyer ON Dr. John Anke
ua-cam.com/video/pZyRgYZe6tM/v-deo.html
Why i believe in a young earth by ex-evolutionist Dr.Grady McMurtry Part 1 (21:42)
ua-cam.com/video/uJGairhrPGc/v-deo.html
Why i believe in a young earth by ex-evolutionist Dr.Grady McMurtry Part 2 (21:24)
ua-cam.com/video/f1Qr9ZZ-Y30/v-deo.html
Why i believe in a young earth by ex-evolutionist Dr.Grady McMurtry Part 3 (21:38)
ua-cam.com/video/xc-qInfV174/v-deo.html
Why i believe in a young earth by ex-evolutionist Dr.Grady McMurtry Part 4 (9:33)
ua-cam.com/video/txEoErEWdaI/v-deo.html
Science Confirms the Bible (58:08) Ken Ham - Answers in Genesis (Dawkins destroyed)
ua-cam.com/video/CFYswvGoaPU/v-deo.html
What is the probability of a functional protein existing by chance? (7:27) Dr Stephen C. Meyer via Lloyd Chin
ua-cam.com/video/JQ3hUlU0vR4/v-deo.html
How the Origin of Life Points to the Existence of God (14:37) Cold-Case Christianity with J. Warner Wallace
ua-cam.com/video/E4uRWk06Wo0/v-deo.html
*ALIENS*
"Evidence for a Spiritual View of the "Alien" Phenomenon:"Why do many Christians think the alien phenomena is demonic?" © 2009 Guy Malone,
www.alienstranger.com/arealiensdemons.htm (article)
A Study of the Nephilim and their Return as Aliens by Chuck Missler (57:29)
ua-cam.com/video/EjcOhOydkoE/v-deo.html
Alex Jones Explains Conciousness | Joe Rogan (9:30) JRE Clips - Feb 28, 2019
ua-cam.com/video/B2HurtTUtXs/v-deo.html
*SUPERNATURAL*
When exorcists need help, they call him -By John Blake, CNN (article)
www.cnn.com/2017/08/04/health/exorcism-doctor/index.html
*THEOLOGY*
The Bible (time varies)
(----------Book----------)
The Case for Christ (1hr 52mins) 2017
(------------MovieDVD--------------)
If There Is No God, Murder Isn't Wrong (5:17) Dennis Prager
ua-cam.com/video/yrcQ_PTkVD4/v-deo.html
✡ Believe in God in 5 Minutes (Scientific Proof) (5:27)
ua-cam.com/video/eQVm8RokoBA/v-deo.html
Mitochondrial DNA Supports the Biblical Timeline (4:26)
ua-cam.com/video/Y1ejXXJfzjk/v-deo.html
The Simple Cell? - Chuck Missler : Koinonia House (12:21)
ua-cam.com/video/OTXvkNmdLDo/v-deo.html
Chuck missler DNA by chance??? - Chuck Missler (11:05)
ua-cam.com/video/QjbenDTAUUg/v-deo.html
What Are The Odds Statistically: Jesus/Prophecy (1 of 3) Chuck Missler (10:00)
ua-cam.com/video/7jY15Y8-_Fk/v-deo.html
What Are The Odds Statistically: Jesus/Prophecy (2 of 3) Chuck Missler (10:10)
ua-cam.com/video/MfpGhqbiBkI/v-deo.html
What Are The Odds Statistically: Jesus/Prophecy (3 of 3) Chuck Missler (10:00)
ua-cam.com/video/mk3HQwcWY-Q/v-deo.html
Science Continues to Reveal God (15:47) CBN, the 700 club -astrophysicist Hugh Ross
ua-cam.com/video/i1oCQ6bZ_Ws/v-deo.html
Noah's Ark - Chuck Missler : Koinonia House (8:27)
ua-cam.com/video/cGVdWHmfiYA/v-deo.html
Were the Pyramids Built Before the Flood? (Masoretic Text vs. Original Hebrew) (31:50) Nathan Hoffman
ua-cam.com/video/VI1yRTC6kGE/v-deo.html
How could an all-powerful, all-loving God allow evil to exist? (5:58) Ravi Z -John Ankerberg Show
ua-cam.com/video/NAm8iK8VhV0/v-deo.html
Who is responsible for evil? (7:38) Ravi Zacharias + Os Guinness
ua-cam.com/video/xUohtd2hP78/v-deo.html
How do you know that Christianity is the one true worldview? (9:30) Ravi Zacharias
ua-cam.com/video/nWY-6xBA0Pk/v-deo.html
Debate 19 Kent Hovind Vs. Three Evolutionists : Kent Hovind (2:21:24)
ua-cam.com/video/T3fmNK3rT8o/v-deo.html
FROM BABYLON TO AMERICA: THE PROPHECY MOVIE | SFP School for Prophets (2:03:06)
ua-cam.com/video/5pQvM9ZY41k/v-deo.html
2017SEP10 - Why We Know Christianity is True - J Warner Wallace (55:23)(Canon)
ua-cam.com/video/DCHJbO-3-jA/v-deo.html
The most likable atheist you will ever meet. (15:06) Wretched Ep 1928
ua-cam.com/video/3IMxb3_pV3A/v-deo.html
Bible-Names Code: From Adam to Jesus (article)
www.bible-codes.org/Names-Bible-Prophecy-Code.htm
Archaeological Evidence that Proves the Bible is True (1:20:52)Planet Zion - Jun 24, 2014
ua-cam.com/video/TPLiKDciPi8/v-deo.html
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you consider yourself intelligent, and have a scientific mind, you will assess all available information, and follow the evidence.
@@marcosorduno9203 yeah, like the leftist retards who have continued spreading Russian collusion propaganda for 3 years...braindead morons
Totally underrated part of this scene is the random dude sitting at the bar the whole time
i would go to their bar just to see stuff like that, free entertainment, well minus the cost of drinks
@@edmasterson4588 that would be pretty amazing
@@edmasterson4588 Which could be zero, if only they stuck with the free Paddy's Dollars...
Surprised no on has claimed it's a Marvel "Easter Egg" about how Thanos first got his idea to wipe out half the population. I'm too dumb to piece it together, but a smart MCU fan could make the theory work.
@@thedancingveganatheist6310 what
I like how Mac chose a buff male model to represent humanity, it's the little touches that really build a character
Never even noticed this
Lmao I'm pretty sure that is the male model "Rex" they always bring on the show.
Well the pen-penis he put in his mouth with the psicologist was pretty much it
nochtczar did you see the Dark Side of the Moon album motif by Newton? Love it
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's Rex who pops up on the show from time to time.
Love the bell tolling with every logic bomb of Mac....
You guys don't have a bombshell!?
Fuckin right
The death knell
The bell is what puts this amazing scene over the top. However I might not refer to Mac’s points as “logic bombs”. Haha
@@peterosesbooky how many times you whack-in off a week?
"They kept being wrong.....sometimes" damn I love this show.
@Shri Shiva Dhasen your a virgin, btw that word is banned on twitch you stupid science bitch!
@Shri Shiva Dhasen its always sunny in Philadelphia you scrub, go watch it!
the bells make it
+HeyTray1 LOL dang I said same exact thing.
Their music/sound effects are always amazing.
HeyTray1 We can all agree that it's the best comedy TV show.
It's like fucking Death Note
I was expecting "Hell's Bells" to start playing eventually.
This is so ridiculously well-acted. Comedies don't get enough credit for that; dramatic acting is always given the praise but this cast and this scene in particular is a masterclass in comedic acting. Just brilliant.
Also, most comedians can be great dramatic actors. It's been said that a good comedian can be a great dramatist, but a good dramatist won't necessarily be good at comedy.
Exogen Roar
Precisely. So many comedians have ventured into dramatic work and knocked it out of the park; Robin Williams, Steve Carrell, Louis CK (despite the allegations), and more.
@@AS-mv7tm this is a myth. Seinfeld has talked about how he'd try to put his comic friends in episodes and they'd suck at acting. Bob odenkirk does a barely passable job in breaking bad/better call saul. Comedians are about as good at acting as anyone else.
@@jhk6558: I disagree. You more often find comedians acting than any other type of person, and acting fairly well.
_"Bob odenkirk does a barely passable job in breaking bad/better call saul."_
That's a nice opinion you have there. Most would disagree.
jhk655
Considering Bob has been nominated for numerous awards for his dramatic acting, I'd say he does more than a "passable" job. Sounds like your personal biases are clouding your judgment.
Mac "evolution is a lie".
Frank"god dam you Mac".
brilliant
Ha ! Nicely spotted but do you think that subtlety was intentional ?
Probably intentional but ,,God dams" is used very often in Sunny and it fit here anyway^^.
God damn you Mac **eats snack**
I don’t get it. Can anyone explain it. I’m dumb as shit 😞
@@kuppdaballsstrokedastaff429 He believes in GOD hence god damn it
Charlie's face after he slaps the first 'bitch' sticker kills me every time, it's so subtle and so hilarious
He's so easily impressed I love it
Pigeon Protector I know, such a simple yet awesome acting choice
Little late here but I think Charlie in that moment discovered that the earth wasn't the center of the Galaxy lol
PeacefulJoint
Well he cant read anything on the board since hes illiterate maybe just slapping red symbols on a scientists face was enough for him to be shocked lmao
PeacefulJoint
Also wouldn't be surprised if Charlie had tried to eat mercury so hearing that someone died from it could have been alarming to him too
"I don't have to change my mind, because I'm an American." LOL XD
@@jhk6558 Lol did you mispell fa ggot because your mom checks the chatlogs?
This is probably the most coherent argument Mac has ever constructed, and it is still so utterly ridiculous.
Mark McElroy It's still one of those things that only holds up if you don't put it under any pressure. He did call it a false equivalency, and he's right. You are overwhelmingly more likely to have a mostly accurate picture of the world by accepting the consensus view of the world's experts in their respective fields, views constructed by analyzing the world through the scientific method, than you are by believing just one of the countless creation myths produced more than a thousand years ago. Science isn't about being right, it's about progressively becoming less wrong, and not getting too attached to one view of the world to let it go when it's proven to be wrong. Even scientists need to trust the word of scientists in other fields, because human endevour has become so vast and specialized that it's impossible for anybody to become an expert in everything in less than a lifetime.
Yeah but you can't just believe everything someone says because "science" backs it. Especially psychology and well everything revolving around health. Health studies constantly change, one minute trans fat is okay if not good for you, the next it's bad for you; the same with saturated fat. I read a few psychology studies and their conclusions were almost the exact opposite of what the studies actually found, it's pretty ridiculous. And since no one will read the damn study, news agencies can have headlines like "Men are okay with rape." But in the study itself it says 99% of men aren't okay with rape, but since the study found 100% of women aren't okay with rape, obviously that means men are okay with rape in their mind. There's just a lot political motivations to push bullshit in psychology. So you have to be somewhat skeptical of almost everything that you haven't read about yourself. Or you're just acting like a peasant who believes everything the priest says that god wants, because he's supposedly the voice of god. Also the scientific method is a little broken right now, in a lot universities your study won't be publish unless your conclusion matches your hypothesis, so it's basically forcing people to lie or they wasted their time and possibly their money.
LordClansman there's clickbait in scientific journals too. Also skewed research with highly coincidental outcomes usually in studies funded by special interests
YouRSmalltime, what is your idea of "scientific journals"? True scientific journals are written for their peers, and not for the mass media.
True scientific journals also show bias in who they select to publish, although this bias is probably less so than in other areas. Peer review is far from perfect. Bias still exists, and will continue to exist as long as there is a human element. Bias and junk science is particularly prevalent in courts of law. There is no shortage of medical experts who will advance junk science for a pretty penny.
For example, the NFL and NHL, as well as bike helmet manufacturers, have all been sued multiple times, sometimes in class actions suits by people advancing junk science that asserts that football and hockey cause progressive brain diseases (CTE) when in fact the disease is fictional, and the rate of progressive brain diseases in athletes is even less so than the general public.
I love Charlie's face when Mac says Newton died eating mercury, lmao.
***** roflmao
Pratama Wirya have you been eating paint?
The best part is he actually died cause of mercury
“Died eating mercury? What, did he choke on it? Stupid science bitch.“
Charlie is the type who would totally eat mercury, just because lol
This scene makes me even more pissed off that this show hasn't won any awards. So well acted, and so much complexity to the concept. The way Dennis sounds as he's being backed into a corner, and how Mac's smug debate voice is so accurate, just blows my mind.
"Rock, flag, & Eagle. Right, Charlie?"
+Andrew fallon "He's got a point"
+Lewis Evans "No he doesn`t"
Gonna kick some ass, in the USA, gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna flyyyyy on an eagle..
Andrew fallon good point
ROCK, FLAG, AND EAGLEEEEE!!!!!
smartest few minutes in the whole series. perfect writing. how this show's depth is not appreciated worldwide is startling. the new seasons aren't even advertised.
Yeah they are. I saw advertisements all over fx for last season. I agree with you though.
This latest season had the highest viewership of any season so far. Still a drop in the bucket compared to the mass-ingested crap on regular tv, but a positive sign!
We Plants Are Happy Plants maybe its because with scenes like these peoples mids start working
+Allison Rose true :)
Kaumak Well I mean this is pretty much FX's best show
I love this show just for the fact that in almost every scene that takes place in Paddy's, there are one or two customers drinking off-screen.
Imagine being the lucky customer and watching a real live theatre comedy play out.
You do realize it takes many retakes to make one scene.
What the hell does that have to do with what I said? I know this, I never said it's actually live or anything, I'm saying hypothetically.
My wife is a gaffer and I've been there done that... it's tough not to laugh sometimes. Watching these guys work over the years there are few mistakes made and production runs smoothly.
Imagine you have a bar in rl where you can go and watch 5 idiots and their weird adventures.
I would be there every day xD
Every goddamn second of this scene is pure gold
Neato Burrito every second of It's Always Sunny is pure fucking gold.
@@TobeyFairre7861 I am not so sure about Frank's brother episode tho
@ Rohan Pansari - SHADYNASTY!!!!!! DON'T LEAVE ME!!!!!! That one was pretty funny too bro.
Like your username
Santa Ana This is the only video I actually appreciated that UA-cam recommended.
lol this is a fantastically written scene.
+HitmanX0X what?0
makes fun of both sides
most scenes are
GOD DAMN YOU, MAC!
Yea. This is the smartest 20 minutes they've ever done.
“Have you seen the fossil records?”
“Seen them? Not physically.”
Underrated comment 😂
@Superstar Worm now prove that they are actual fossils, not fake ones
@@rinkashikachi Well for starters it's illegal for museum to put non factual artifacts on display
@@alski200 Prove that a fossil is from a dinosaur.
@@foodunravelled2836 Where else would a fossil have come from, what kinda of question is that?
“This is insane you fool” lmao dennis
These liberals trying assassinate my character. 😂
I'm just a regular dude, I love my family. Rockflag & Eagle! 🦅
yung drizzle He’s got a point...
Jot that down.
You realize it's ironic, right?
Stupid science bitches
The most painful part of watching this is that there are so many people who really wouldn't know how to respond to this IRL and it does cause science to look stupid. Insanely smart writing and I hate it.
I mean the truth is science has reached a point where you have to conduct ridiculously meticulously planned experiments to come up with an answer to a small question.
That's what science students are trained to do for 10 years to get a PhD.
The average person couldn't replicate any of the experiments which are published in journals today. The average person is therefore left with no choice but to 'trust' the findings of the scientific community and take their word for it.
Chandan Bhowal Outside of rudimentary science, I couldn’t speak on really anything found in a scientific journal with any confidence because I would have zero idea how to back the information up. I am pro science but it’s extremely hard for those who don’t study that field. Plus both political isles in the USA LOVE to bastardize science in the name of partisanship and in the past 20 years a lot of science has become warped and presented in biased ways to fit a narrative presented by whatever party is presenting. Independent reviewed studies are more important that ever in today’s society.
@San Týr 'Lay people' are free to go get themselves a degree in science and repeat an experiment. Literally nobody controls knowledge.
K
We trust science because of its methodologies. Taking it on blind faith isn't part of science, it's part of religion.
Mac is literally just playing Dennis in this scene and it's phenomenal.
And Dennis is playing Charlie.
the funniest part in this whole scene was Danny DeVito's only line : "GOD DAMN YOU MAC!" 😂😂😂
KDonkey4lyf 😂 right?
I came looking for the one who comment that!
@@SuperEw123 same bro! i had to act when i didnt find one loool
He does also say "put me over there" at the end 😏 but jokes aside his delivery is incredible
"Rock, flag, and Eagle. Am i right Charlie"
He’s got a point
@@Abysalss no he doesn't
What's the rock part mean? Land?
@@shmookins rock n roll
@@Abysalss What?!
0:03 Goddamn you Mac. *continues to eat snacks without a care in the world*
Comrade Snake i
@patsap84 you should see him eat pocket sausage on a movie set.
Dare I say it.....faith?
Bongggggggggg
Dare I say it......F.....Faith?
ARTHUR HAVE SOME GODDAMN FAITH !!!!
- Dutch
@@buddyman5838 tahiti?
@@mosesmarlboro5401 Yeah, sure.
This scene and this show should’ve won all the awards.
It does have 'all of the words'
The Gang Tries To Win an Award
and then we found out that pluto isn't actually a planet and it made us all look like a "bitch", then a few years later we found out that it turns out that pluto is actually a planet. and we looked like a "bitch" again.
No. Our definitions of what a planet is changed.
Charnel ya, and it's classification as a planet changed with it
***** No shit. But pluto is pluto. It's not like the words we describe to it change it. "We found out" doesn't make sense.
Charnel hey? whats with the attitude? I'm just trying to make a joke here.
***** I guess I prefer jokes that use logic.
I'm not sure how you can tell if I have an attitude or not though. Or is this a tactic to make the opposition in an argument look like the "emotional" one? hmm..
I love how the foreboding bell tolls every time....
"of course he also thought he could turn metal into gold and died eating mercury"
Charlie's inner-monologue: "he ate the planet?"
Charlie's fuckin' reactions man.
*Heads over to library of congress*
Librarian: "May I help you?"
Me: "Fossil records section please"
*Begins reading*
#IWillNotBeAStupidScienceBitch
Kabba Coulibaly 😂😂😂
and what is the truth?
Allison Rose Everything should be taken with skepticism. Anyways you're speaking broadly because you have no actual point. The earth is not flat, btw. (although i would love to see an episode of IASIP where they argue that subject).
Allison Rose also, learn how to properly use the term "ironic".
"because there is none."... i guess you've never heard of carbon dating. :/ Stay in school, kiddo.
bambi raptor You sound like you lead a miserable life, judging how you care so much about someone's opinion... Good luck
"Sir Isaac Newton got born and blew everyone's nips off with his huge brains"
Everything about this sentence is amazing
All except he was an idiot who ate mercury. Lol what an idiot... oh wait he is the mind behind the theory of gravitation... yep indeed he is an idiot
He said big brains, but I agree.
Course he thought he could turn metal into gold and died eating mercury, making him another stupid *slam* BITCH!!
@@samuraiturtle.2637 lmao 😂 man I about died watching this scene for the first time
I won't have to change my mind on anything. Because I'm an American.
But what about Rock, Flag and Eagle?
:)) GODDAMN I FUCKING LOVE THIS COUNTRY!!!
As an American I have the right to be stupid! Just as God intended.
@@christobanistan8887 You do realize he was mocking us (Americans)?
@@Alextipping5 probably not, he probably has also legitimately made mac's argument in the last 2 weeks.
This is seriously one of the best IASIP episodes ever.
facts. easily in my top 5
My favorite of them all
Oh Diane you dumb bitch
Oh you’re absolutely right. This is such an underrated episode-
Most fans just call it "Sunny."
The bell in the background absolutely makes this scene 😂
love how he takes 3 hours to make a few cutups and drawings
That would have taken me a week lol.
Mac never skimps on production values #projectbadass
Tbh that's actually pretty fast, if those 3 hours were used for everything we see here. Would take most people longer.
Love how he's like "give me fifteen minutes"
*3 hours later*
Even in the new season too with the picture for the bathrooms lol
The best part about always sunny is it makes everyone look like a idiot. Conservatives and liberals, atheists and believers.
+firebat724 I just thought about believing in God for a moment.
+derp durp you dont seem happy though.
Also why I love South Park
I'll admit, I'm pretty stupid... But im not a stupid science bitch.
firebat724 And then it makes other people look stupid when they agree with jokes.
I love how when Dennis is like "sure. Yeah. Okay!" He has three completely different facial expressions. Perfect delivery.
Mac V. Bill Nye. Make it happen.
I second that or Nile Tyson.
Bill Nye has turned full SJW leftist, so it would actually be pretty hilarious to watch
Ken Ham is basically Mac without the humor so go see that 2014 debate of Ken Ham and Bill Nye.
Nye and Tyson were always nothing more than cringy, uneducated TV scientists. It’s still funny how people took this long to realize it.
Would be quite fun to watch Mac debunk them.
Nye is not a scientist and Tyson is a confirmed fraud. Find a real scientist.
A brilliant scene. A fallacy within a fallacy within a fallacy within a fallacy. Simply brilliant.
How the hell did we get from whose at fault for a minor fender bender to what is the origin of the universe?
Bc that's what fools do. Lol. Argue themselves into an oblivion where nothing will ever make sense bc the topic keeps changing before its "resolved."
Marian Elesha Exactly. Well said. You can never argue with a fool because they will always try to change the subject when they feel they are losing ground.
@@jaypee9575 thank you and very true. It just goes on and on until you wear yourself out. Lol. Had to learn that lesson the hard way.
“You made it about evolution when you attacked Mac’s character”
I'd guess alcohol
Charlie totally makes this scene with how he eats up everything Mac says
I know most people won’t read this but I feel compelled to explain why this scene is the most brilliant piece of comedy I’ve ever seen.
1 - Nothing is wasted. Every detail, from scene design to timing, has a purpose and draws the viewer into the world and it’s characters (the death bells... monkeys and buff dudes on posters... like what are those graphs next to Aristotle? 😂😂😂)
2 - The way Mac and Dennis are written here well defines their characters which highlights their conflict of opinion. Honestly can’t think of another scene in the show that draws them out so sharply (Mac is so... Mac, same for Dennis). The climax and resolution effectively uses the entire cast to satirize the views of protagonist/antagonist without overextending into hyperbole and maintaining relatability
3 - Serves as a witty commentary on entrenched positions on politics, science, and religion in modern American culture with historical references adeptly woven in. All while alluding to a deeper age old conflict, always lurking, but never ending. And where does this ancient battle pop up this time? Paddy’s freaking Pub!
5 - In a rare role reversal, Dennis, despite having the crowd with him and Mac’s obvious flaws, is outshone and forced to take a back seat to Mac, flipping their usual dynamic upside down.
4 - Mac and Dennis’s exchange employs logic and rhetoric that is so crisp and digestible but stays complex. Did Mac use shaky emotional appeals in establishing his argument? Of course he did because he’s Mac, and he doubles down because he’s an American 😂! And even though Dennis starts making counter claims that should win out logically, Mac is able take that strength of Dennis’s “leap of faith” argument, pull out the rug from under him, and turn it against him due to his hubris. That dramatic turn is what makes the whole scene so memorable to me.
I seriously think it could be used as a jumping off point for a case study in writing, history, logic, rhetoric, psychology, culture, and comedy. I love this scene, and you should too. And don’t go trying to change my mind, because I’m dug in and I’ll never change
Lol, I like how you put 5 before 4. And yeah, as someone who hasn't watched this show (yet), this is pretty great comedy.
@@thirdcoinedge LOL I never noticed I just wrote, IASIP is AMAZING!
Ah god his expression when he says “I put evolution... oN tHe LeFt” kills me every time
I love how Charlie is impressed by Mac's statements. There's nothing on this scene that I don't like
This is a better argument against evolution than PragerU's video.
That's not saying much
And still shitty nonetheless.
This video is better than any PragerU video, tbh
Prager U’s where the worlds retards come from
Mac's performance is amazing in this scene, but Charlie's facial expressions kill me every time! hahahaha
I had a similar conversation at a bar in Nashville in 2014. My response to "have you seen these fossils and examined the records yourself?" was "I can see the fossils in the museum, and if I choose to study that side then I can verify the records myself just as thousands around the world do every year as part of their post-graduation studies. Till then, I can choose to go with the global checks and balances in place that help ensure all ideas and claims can be examined internationally". The international nature of science was something my conversation partners acknowledged that they hadn't considered.
I love that ominous bell sound in the background, it's perfect.
I die every time Frank says “god damn you Mac” 😂😂
The absolute best scene in the show
Korey Pecha Not with such a fantastic show as this.
Better than "My tools!"? Or D.E.N.N.I.S.? I guess I have a Dennis bias...
the way Mac says "No matter, I'm righteous" sounds like Ron Burgundy to me
"the gang gets into philosophy of science"
The gong is the best part
S U C C
Not a gong. Bells. And listening to it again, sounds like a French Horn too, or trombones.
I hate the fact that I feel like Mac is making good points. I know he's wrong, but I don't know enough about science to dispute him.
hal the greatest that's kind of the point. No matter how logical science may be, 99% of its believers never actually look at the data to confirm its truth. We take what teachers tell us in school and what scientist say on tv or in magazines and accept it. As a result hardly anyone can argue the actual science behind evolution. Not unless you've "poured through the data yourself, the numbers, the figures."
Circular logic... Mac uses the knowledege of modern science to show how old scientists and philosophers were wrong. So he has to pick one. Either he believes in modern science enough to show old old scientists were wrong, in which case he'd have to be knowledgeble himself to discredit evolution, or he doesn't believe modern science. In which case, he'd have to deny all the body of knowledge in the field of physics, quantum mechanics, chemistry, etc, which allow him to drive cars, fly on planes and talk to people on the phone.
Bernardo W. he's not trying to refute science as a whole, just a certain segment of it (evolution). You don't have to either believe or disbelieve every single part of science, which is a very broad disciple.
But ted, isn't he trying to show how aristoles was wrong by believeing the earth was the center of the universe, therefore proving that scientists make mistakes? Which he can then only prove by basing himself in the knowledge provided by modern science, which tells us the earth isn't even the center of our solar system?. :) Therefore, circular logic. He refutes modern science's legitimacy by basing himself in arguments sustained by modern science.
From "scientists make mistakes" to "evolution isn't real" is a big leap. He's using circular logic and ad hominem falacies to discredit science, when he himself doesn't have any concrete argument to disprove the theory of evolution (a scientific theory, therefore based in observed facts). The only thing he MAY have proved, is the lack of knowledge by Dennis. Which, is not the same for everyone. High-school level biology and geology gives you a pretty good grasp as to why Evolution is most likely a real thing (paleonthology, geology, microbiology, embriology, etc). Therefore, he himself, is the person he is criticizing. Therefore, and again, circular logic.
This is honestly one of the best parodies of the American audience yet! lmao
I love this scene.
If I ever became a theology teacher I would show this in my class every semester.
Carothy and you'd be dead wrong 100% of the time, spewing false information ( but that's the point of religion)
lol ando1135 this is a comedy show. no need to get all butt hurtsky.
Carothy "remember kids, don't be a science bitch"
ando1135 I sense a lot of oddly placed hate here.
Carothy Well you can’t put all theology classes together haha. I mean, Catholicism, the largest religion in the world, clearly states that evolution is real (I’m Catholic). Some theology classes do teach that everything the Bible says is fact, but those are fundamentalists, those who take every Bible word as fact. These are also the type of people to believe being gay is a sin though so... 😂
"They kept being wrong... sometimes." gets me every time
Dennis is basically an "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" twitter user.
The clash of two different epistemological standpoints.
I love this show. there are so many shows that have biased political views and just preach them in such an obnoxious manor. but not this show, its always just hilarious.
+Alex F. Yep. Most shows do like what they did in the Emmys. The guy said, Donald Trump is racist. Then to make things even he went after the Democrats as well. And he said Bernie Sanders looks like he's always late for a plane. Calling a guy a racist is so much worse than making fun of a guys appearance. But then they get to say " see we made fun of both parties".
+joe momma Well Donald Trump is the one with records of racism from previous employees and is the one generalizing Mexicans as rapists. If Bernie Sanders did shit like that, they would make fun of it.
They resort to his appearance because he isn't acting like a goddamn moron on stage. It's not their fault one candidate is so much more of a baffoon.
mattyfromcali Bill Clinton has multiple rape allegations. How many times has the media brought those up?
Bill Clinton isn't running for President. And as far as his infidelity goes, it's broughten up constantly.
mattyfromcali I'm talking about rape, not infidelity... Everybody knows about his infidelity. Just like they said about Bill Cosby "google it".
I love the guy sitting at the bar behind Dennis. I can only imagine what's going through that dude's mind.
THIS IS INSANE, YOU FOOL!
A good Bird Lawyer would have shredded Mac's argument!
Nonsense, this has nothing to do with Bird Law.
Actually birds are the last living descendants of dinosaurs... You can find that in the fossil record...birdlaw for the win... You dumb science bish.
I'm actually impressed how much Mac knew about these scientists
Ikr? Either mac has been waiting for this moment his entire life or he is just a genius, sometimes! *Bell Toll!
"Well that got me...frank you want me to..yeah alright" LMAOOO
"...he's got a point."
The problem is He proved that a normal person can't proof evolution right but neither did he prove evolution wrong nor did he proof that god created man. He exposed the hypocrisy but he never proved evolution wrong.
@@pravinrao3669
He didn't even expose hypocrisy. Trusting the field of biologists with decades of experience studying biology and doing experiments to speak about biology is in no way the same as trusting a group of people with little to no training in biology who oppose a theory that has been solidified by the scientific community for several decades if not centuries. You shouldn't trust your priest about whether your house is safe if the civil engineer inspectors were telling you it was not safe and the priest was telling you it was safe. So we shouldn't do it for any other subject for which there are legitimate experts with data and proof.
It was good comedy, though.
@@educatainment1799 Ah yes, the appeal to authority argument. Very big brained of you. LOL!
@@educatainment1799 Keep using that appeal to authority fallacy, it seems to be working for you!
@@lambdachi493
Keep thinking people with decades of experience in biology are equivalent to people with no experience, it doesn't seem to be working for you!
Still better than God's Not Dead
*ding*
Cleo Taylor right?
I mean, it’s not like that’s too hard...
I mean, it was pretty interesting that it was based on several true stories, but why did the professor have to die, especially before he apologized to his wife?
Rock, Flag and Eagle, right Charlie?
No he doesn't!
See Charlie, these liberals are trying to assassinate my character
It's just a bunch of Liberal bullshit..
plnkfloydian Were gonna solve the gas crisis
I remember watching this episode every night before I went to sleep for like two months straight.
A beautiful episode showing how the vast majority of people don’t have have arguments past appealing to authority
The argument from authority is only a fallacy if it's a false authority. Citing scientific consensus is an actual authority, hence the argument is valid.
@@-morrow who determines if an authority is false or true? The establishment. Scientific consensus is always changing
@@VashTheDamnFiend No, scientific consensus isn't always changing. The theory of natural selection has now been consensus for nearly a 100 years and it takes decades for theories to become scientific consensus. It's the least changing thing in all of science.
Also, I don't know what you could mean by "the establishment", this term is meaningless.
The irony of this skit is brilliant, juxtaposed with the gullible comments makes it a masterpiece. The exact reason as to why he doesn't believe the scientist, is the exact reason it works. Lmfao brilliant
This is seriously one of the best moments of this show.
"I'm dug in." Such a perfect distillation.
Checkmate athiests
lol
Ok, this is fucking hilarious :D
I know it's sarcasm, but an inherent property of science is of course that there is no truth :D. Theories can get additional help of new hypotheses, but if there are too many problems a new theoretical framework has to be established. Kind of like a paradigm shift, although I think a paradigm shift is too extreme, since most of the time a new theory also includes parts of the previously accepted theory. Besides that, I think God and evolution theory are compatible if by God is meant everything that there is (not a sole being that influences our decisions or some sh1t). In this Spinozist view on God (even though Spinoza claims God is all material and also everything beyond the material world) you are god, your friend, your mum, I am, your fav pillow, the ice cream you might eat this summer, the rock in the dessert, the sun, the atoms, our emotions, everything. Well ehh, I Kinda got lost typing, have a Nice day y'all!
stephen stewart morons however are not stupid science bitches so checkmate B I T C H.
Your dumb as shit.
I love the sound effects
Okuyasu pretending to be me is hilarious
Frank doesn't own a single shirt without stains
Thurnis Haley it’s for the aesthetic he stains them on purpose
Showed this in my philosophy of religion course, easily one of the best scenes in Always Sunny lmao
ROCK FLAG AND EAGLE
That's a good point
I play this when people say to believe in the covid science. Lol
You realize this bit is making fun of you?
i love how this show can have some amazing satirical humour. It takes an issue and unlike many shows it doesnt take sides, it just shows how people from both sides of the argument can be stupid sometimes. Same with the gun control episode, it just shows both sides in a stupid funny way without forcing their beleifs on the viewer, Refreshing since most shows on tv usually take the liberal point of view to make satirical humour
they use liberal point of view to make fun of conservatives because it's easy, the average views of a conservative are batshit crazy
see you think that because of how they're portrayed on TV. perfect proof of gabriel's point
gabriel lopez this show and south park are the only 2 to do it. South Park might be a little more right wing, but most people can't see it.
Both extremes are crazy. You can see it via their posts on the internet.
Go to tumblr or briebart and watch the insanity unfold.
Lisa the Skeptic and Joy of the Sect from the Simpsons
This is insane, you fool!
well let me ask you just one thing, do you have any such certificate?
Are you a donkey brained man? 🤔
Always sunny is like a great band. Compliment each other. With rythems and leads. All cast is hilarious
"they kept being wrong...sometimes"
"sir Issac Newton gets born"
This is definitely top 3 Mac moments. And I swear to God this just keeps getting funnier every time I see it.
Conspiracy theories
are RIGHT sometimes
Ralph Richter You sure about that?
Ralph Richter Pretty sure I read somewhere he turned out to be right and there were some weird chemicals that were altering the sex of some species of frog. Better question though would be why are we being so autistic about a humorous anecdote?
@Ralph Richter news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/02/160203-feminized-fish-endocrine-disruption-hormones-wildlife-refuges/
Just gonna leave this hear
The gay frog thing was 100 percent true.
@George Henry Imagine not knowing the difference between changing into a female and being gay. Alex Jones is wrong. Frogs were not turning gay.
This is like the best episode ever lol. I loved it. amazing. Mac rekt. Made me even question myself.
Psyxx you can't see the flaw in his argument???
ando1135 well, mister smarty pants, would you mind telling us a hole/flaw in the theory? (not that it's a sound theory, it's just you keep commenting all over the place and seem like an ass )
how is reading a bible some guy wrote any different than reading a book some scholar wrote on evolution? how can the latter be a valid reason for religion being true but not for evolution? that is the flaw in his argument if all you based creationism/evolution was in what he said.
ando1135 Alright, fair enough
Shumeo You’re a fucking idiot
This scene is the Epitome of it's always sunny. Everyone is at their best and most truest point in character history.
People protesting coronavirus: “Science is a liar...sometimes”
That’s what brought me here 😂😂😂
This so relevant right now!
Only government mandated scientists are allowed to speak, there are many extremely well qualified scientists with miles of data proving this ridiculous hoax. Don't worry, a filthy piece of cloth on your face and standing away from people will save you. History will not look favourable at how stupid humanity are being right now, thank God many across the world are waking up.
@@NidgeOSullivan Nice troll
Rock, flag and eagle right Charlie ?
Hes got a point. 👍
The chime really brings the scene together.
He's not making a good point - he's SELLING his point well!
Well, no, he IS making a good point. You can't really have an informed position on the issue unless you look at the data yourself. There are tons of scientific papers that claim things based on their data, but if you look at the data and figures in those same papers closely, those conclusions are often actually not consistent with the data. Scientists often make leaps or false conclusions (not necessarily intentionally). Anyone interested in having an informed position should look at the source data rather than just reading and trusting someone else's conclusion.
this is the funniest and most consistent show made
1:43 Charlie’s face is freakin priceless
Ethan Graham It makes me think he has been eating mercury.
Admittedly, when he brought out the "Evolution v. God Almighty" chart... I didn't expect his argument to be so compelling.
I guess that just affirms the point of the scene: people are easily persuaded by fallacious arguments.